It is volume 52 (51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0)
This is a part of a raw and uneven journal of discovering the origins of the writing systems,
could it be that B follows A because only when the emptiness can be measured between its two states can we tell that something has appeared, but who knows which half matters, so B shows two of them, even though b leaves the emptier half undepicted.
B is for Buddha, right? Here's him in paradise, I didn't think about B when it caught my eye:
Amitayus Buddha in his
buddhafield, a Saṃbhogakāya manifestation for the
benefit of others
suche laborated work is definitely worth being preserved
The Saṃbhogakāya (Ch: 報身, 受用身; Tib. longs sku) refers to the divine magical bodies of the Buddhas which manifest for the benefit of noble bodhisattvas.[2][28] It can be rendered as "co-enjoyment body", and "communal bliss body" (when reading the prefix saṃ- to refer to ‘together with’ or ‘mutual’) or as "complete reward body", "total enjoyment body" (reading saṃ- as "complete", "thoroughness").[34] The Saṃbhogakāya is described by the Mahāyāna-sūtrālamkāra as that which "brings enjoyment of dharma to the circles of assembly."[35] The term is usually associated with more supramundane, cosmic or otherworldly Buddhas.[18][36] For example, Sthiramati names Vairocana, Amitabha and Samantabhadra as Saṃbhogakāya Buddhas.[37]
Amitabha
Vairocana
Samantabhadra
Amitābha (Sanskrit pronunciation: [ɐmɪˈtaːbʱɐ], "Measureless" or "Limitless" Light), also known as Amituofo in Chinese, Amida Butsu in Japanese, Amita-bul in Korean, Avid in Mongolian, A Di Đà Phật in Vietnamese, and Öpakmé in Tibetan, is one of the main Buddhas of Mahayana Buddhism and the most widely venerated Buddhist figure in East Asian Buddhism.[2][3][4] Amitābha is also known by the name Amitāyus ("Measureless Life").[5]
Amitābha is the main figure in two influential Indian Buddhist Mahayana Scriptures: the Sutra of Measureless Life and the Amitābha Sūtra.[6] According to the Sutra of Measureless Life, Amitābha established a pure land of perfect peace and happiness, called Sukhāvatī ("Blissful"), where beings who mindfully remember him with faith may be reborn and then quickly attain enlightenment. The pure land is the result of a set of vows Amitābha made long ago. As his name means Limitless Light, Amitābha's light is said to radiate throughout the cosmos and shine on all beings. Because of this, Amitābha is often depicted radiating light, a symbol for his wisdom.[5] As per the name Amitāyus, this Buddha is also associated with infinite life, since his lifespan is said to be immeasurable. Amitābha's measureless life is seen as being related to his infinite compassion.[5]
Amitābha devotion is particularly prominent in East Asian Buddhism, where the practice of mindfulness of Amitābha Buddha (known as nianfo in Chinese, nembutsu in Japanese) is seen as a path to liberation open to everyone. Amitābha is also the principal Buddha in Pure Land Buddhism, which is a tradition focused on attaining birth in the pure land by relying on the power of Amitābha (also known as "Other Power") and faithfully reciting Amitabha's name. Amitābha is also a major Buddha in Tibetan Buddhism, where he is associated with pure land practices, as well as phowa (the transference of consciousness at the time of death).
Vairocana ("The Sun", "Solar" or "Shining" in Sanskrit[1]), also known as Mahāvairocana (Great Sun), is a major Buddha from Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism. He is often compared to the Sun, because both bestow their light impartially upon all beings. However, unlike the Sun, whose light can be blocked, and which disappears at night, Vairocana's light is omnipresent, impossible to block, and shines eternally. Hence, he is called the "Great Sun".[2] In East Asian Buddhism, Vairocana is called 大日如來 (lit. 'Great Sun Thus Come One') or 毘盧遮那佛 (lit. 'Vairocana Buddha').
Samantabhadra links me to this:
The Ādi-Buddha (Tibetan: དང་པོའི་སངས་རྒྱས།, Wylie: dang po'i sangs rgyas, THL: Dangpö Sanggyé, Ch: 本佛, Jp: honbutsu, First Buddha, Original Buddha, or Primordial Buddha) is a Mahayana Buddhist concept referring to the most fundamental, supreme, or ancient Buddha in the cosmos.[1][2] Another common term for this figure is Dharmakāya Buddha.[3]
The term emerges in tantric Buddhist literature, most prominently in the Kalachakra. "Ādi" means "first", such that the Ādibuddha was the first to attain Buddhahood. "Ādi" can also mean "primordial", not referring to a person but to an innate wisdom that is present in all sentient beings.[4]
and Samantabhadra being the first one refers it to the oldest of the mothers,
which is often depicted as a crone,
and maybe she is depicted between the left shoulder, but I feel it behind my right, but maybe it is because I am used to seeing them in front of me, not behind my back.
And the difference of whether we see them from one point of view or the other could influence the direction in which we write.
And is it why 𐤁 became Б?
Because the writer was sitting facing us and we read what he wrote upside down?
And doesn't it make Б a more basic form of B?
Russians somehow managed to get a form of B closer to the phoenician shape, explain that.
red and orange are so close yet so opposite:suche laborated work is definitely worth being preserved
The Saṃbhogakāya (Ch: 報身, 受用身; Tib. longs sku) refers to the divine magical bodies of the Buddhas which manifest for the benefit of noble bodhisattvas.[2][28] It can be rendered as "co-enjoyment body", and "communal bliss body" (when reading the prefix saṃ- to refer to ‘together with’ or ‘mutual’) or as "complete reward body", "total enjoyment body" (reading saṃ- as "complete", "thoroughness").[34] The Saṃbhogakāya is described by the Mahāyāna-sūtrālamkāra as that which "brings enjoyment of dharma to the circles of assembly."[35] The term is usually associated with more supramundane, cosmic or otherworldly Buddhas.[18][36] For example, Sthiramati names Vairocana, Amitabha and Samantabhadra as Saṃbhogakāya Buddhas.[37]
Amitabha
Vairocana
Samantabhadra
Amitābha (Sanskrit pronunciation: [ɐmɪˈtaːbʱɐ], "Measureless" or "Limitless" Light), also known as Amituofo in Chinese, Amida Butsu in Japanese, Amita-bul in Korean, Avid in Mongolian, A Di Đà Phật in Vietnamese, and Öpakmé in Tibetan, is one of the main Buddhas of Mahayana Buddhism and the most widely venerated Buddhist figure in East Asian Buddhism.[2][3][4] Amitābha is also known by the name Amitāyus ("Measureless Life").[5]
Amitābha is the main figure in two influential Indian Buddhist Mahayana Scriptures: the Sutra of Measureless Life and the Amitābha Sūtra.[6] According to the Sutra of Measureless Life, Amitābha established a pure land of perfect peace and happiness, called Sukhāvatī ("Blissful"), where beings who mindfully remember him with faith may be reborn and then quickly attain enlightenment. The pure land is the result of a set of vows Amitābha made long ago. As his name means Limitless Light, Amitābha's light is said to radiate throughout the cosmos and shine on all beings. Because of this, Amitābha is often depicted radiating light, a symbol for his wisdom.[5] As per the name Amitāyus, this Buddha is also associated with infinite life, since his lifespan is said to be immeasurable. Amitābha's measureless life is seen as being related to his infinite compassion.[5]
Amitābha devotion is particularly prominent in East Asian Buddhism, where the practice of mindfulness of Amitābha Buddha (known as nianfo in Chinese, nembutsu in Japanese) is seen as a path to liberation open to everyone. Amitābha is also the principal Buddha in Pure Land Buddhism, which is a tradition focused on attaining birth in the pure land by relying on the power of Amitābha (also known as "Other Power") and faithfully reciting Amitabha's name. Amitābha is also a major Buddha in Tibetan Buddhism, where he is associated with pure land practices, as well as phowa (the transference of consciousness at the time of death).
Vairocana ("The Sun", "Solar" or "Shining" in Sanskrit[1]), also known as Mahāvairocana (Great Sun), is a major Buddha from Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism. He is often compared to the Sun, because both bestow their light impartially upon all beings. However, unlike the Sun, whose light can be blocked, and which disappears at night, Vairocana's light is omnipresent, impossible to block, and shines eternally. Hence, he is called the "Great Sun".[2] In East Asian Buddhism, Vairocana is called 大日如來 (lit. 'Great Sun Thus Come One') or 毘盧遮那佛 (lit. 'Vairocana Buddha').
Samantabhadra links me to this:
The Ādi-Buddha (Tibetan: དང་པོའི་སངས་རྒྱས།, Wylie: dang po'i sangs rgyas, THL: Dangpö Sanggyé, Ch: 本佛, Jp: honbutsu, First Buddha, Original Buddha, or Primordial Buddha) is a Mahayana Buddhist concept referring to the most fundamental, supreme, or ancient Buddha in the cosmos.[1][2] Another common term for this figure is Dharmakāya Buddha.[3]
The term emerges in tantric Buddhist literature, most prominently in the Kalachakra. "Ādi" means "first", such that the Ādibuddha was the first to attain Buddhahood. "Ādi" can also mean "primordial", not referring to a person but to an innate wisdom that is present in all sentient beings.[4]
and Samantabhadra being the first one refers it to the oldest of the mothers,
which is often depicted as a crone,
and maybe she is depicted between the left shoulder, but I feel it behind my right, but maybe it is because I am used to seeing them in front of me, not behind my back.
And the difference of whether we see them from one point of view or the other could influence the direction in which we write.
And is it why 𐤁 became Б?
Because the writer was sitting facing us and we read what he wrote upside down?
And doesn't it make Б a more basic form of B?
Russians somehow managed to get a form of B closer to the phoenician shape, explain that.
orange revolution is red fleg being peeed on.
(it does correspond the chakra thing in that red is the lowest of the low, and orange pisses on it)
(but maybe we shouldn't delve into the depth of all those esoteric teachings, for truth is more likely to be hidden in the plain sight. Here it makes sense to seek where there's lighter in that I didn't lose it, so I cannot know where it can be found. I start from the simple and move further into obscure. But I have already looked into many obscure places, and can say that it is EVERYWHERE)
Аз как Язык
Bible as Book, Буки, Буквы.
Веди отлично вписывается в этот ряд. Говори, Читай, Знай
И предполагаю что подобно тому как те две чакры добавлены после, так и А пришла с ними.
B как шея? или Butt?
Г guts
D груДь? It looks like breast. B looks like butt.
E (the way rosh is in the end of the alphabet,
this one also goes from the bottom up. from the root, from b to u? from b to h (h is for head and hair. 8 letters there were? Maybe even 7. Hyginus reports on 7. h is definitely ♄, Saturn, the Set's day. Seth's)
And I measured how much my spine can rotate when the neck doesnt' turn. Around 60° each side.
one third of the room it can. And head is rotating 30° each side. It gives us 180° of direct view, and when we add to it how eyes can see 90° to each direction, we get about 360° in which we can look without moving the lower part of the body. In standing position legs also roll and it gives us even wider scope. We thus can look backwards in both directions.
Standing we can watch 360° without moving our eyes.
Now let's check if the petal theory holds.
(petal (лепесток) и lepel (лацкан, т.е. в сущности одна петля, как в двух петель) messes me so much, as if they used to be the same thing named differently, and then they normalized it differently)
then 16 may equal 60°
thus 12 may equal 45°
then 10 may equal 37.5°
and 6 equals 22.5°
and 5 equals 18.75° (4 equals 15°)
45 + 37.5 + 22.5 + 18.75 = 123.75
So the base chakra has 4 petals:
45 + 37.5 + 22.5 + 15 = 120°
and the movement of the neck was seen as 60°
120° + 60° = 180°
Higher chakra is naturally the eyes, they can roll, but that "96 or 2 large petals of 48 each" is too much, eyes do not roll like that (rolled his eyes)
96 is 6 times 16, which is 6 times 60°,
which is 360°, and it is surprisingly accurate, for when
we add the rotation of the eyes we can see 360°.
But the 1000 of the crown chakra is whether insane, or it must come from many other people reporting to the crown. If it equals some equal number of people, I can take it seriously, otherwise it is as silly as M in the roman numerals, ignorant patch not even allowing to count to Millions.
Is it why million is mille²
while milliard is mille
♄ as h is also S, Of the seven IU-Pitar? But the 1000 of the crown chakra is whether insane, or it must come from many other people reporting to the crown. If it equals some equal number of people, I can take it seriously, otherwise it is as silly as M in the roman numerals, ignorant patch not even allowing to count to Millions.
Is it why million is mille²
while milliard is mille
I thought of Mercury, but Ю-Питер идеальное начало, единственная планета начинающаяся с гласной. И самая большая. Юпитер самая большая, но могли ли мы об этом раньше знать?
I was surprised by volume given in negatives, now measuring darkness instead of light is insane.
I asked it what was 0, here's what it said:
* Ancient Origins: Around 150 BC, the Greek astronomer Hipparchus ranked stars into six classes of "magnitudes". The brightest stars were "1st class," and the faintest visible to the naked eye were "6th class".
* The Logarithmic Scale: In 1856, astronomer Norman Pogson regularized this system. He realized human vision is logarithmic, not linear. He defined a difference of 5 magnitudes to equal exactly a 100-fold change in brightness.
* The Math: Because 2.512⁵ ≈ 100, each step on the scale represents a brightness change of roughly 2.512 times. A magnitude 1 star is 2.512⁵ times brighter than a magnitude 2 star. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
## What is 0?
Historically, a magnitude of 0 was defined by the brightness of the star Vega. [5, 7]
* The Anchor: Astronomers chose Vega (the brightest star in the constellation Lyra) as the universal "zero point" baseline. Anything brighter than Vega drops into negative numbers; anything dimmer goes into positive numbers.
* Modern Physics: Because Vega varies slightly in brightness, modern astronomers no longer use the physical star. Instead, a magnitude of 0 is mathematically defined by a specific, standardized amount of light energy (photon flux) hitting a detector. However, it remains calibrated to match Vega's historical brightness. [2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]
------------------------------
If you are planning to observe the night sky, tell me your city and which planet you want to see. I can tell you if it is currently visible in your sky!
[1] [https://astronomy.stackexchange.com](https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/14516/how-can-apparent-magnitude-be-negative)
[2] [https://pages.astro.umd.edu](https://pages.astro.umd.edu/~richard/ASTRO421/Stars_Bender_chapter2.pdf)
[3] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apparent_magnitude)
[4] [https://lco.global](https://lco.global/spacebook/distance/what-apparent-magnitude/)
[5] [https://www.astro.sunysb.edu](https://www.astro.sunysb.edu/fwalter/AST101/magnitudes.html)
[6] [https://astro4edu.org](https://astro4edu.org/ko/resources/glossary/term/15/)
[7] [https://study.com](https://study.com/academy/lesson/apparent-magnitude-definition-formula.html)
[8] [https://www.reddit.com](https://www.reddit.com/r/astrophysics/comments/qhz3ic/what_does_an_absolute_magnitude_of_0_mean/)
[9] [https://globeatnight.org](https://globeatnight.org/magnitudes/)
[10] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vega)
[11] [https://encyclopedia.pub](https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/27780)
The bitch gives its sources, how very academic of her. Not exactly the sources academia approves of, but it was their own fault that they're all behing paywalls.
This astronomy thing is crazy, and though it naturally may hold some secrets, maybe I shouln't go deep into all those magnitudes (and that one magnitude brighter is 2.216 times brighter) but one thing we may look into:
and I asked if it was the same in the ancient times, and it said
Yes, the ranking was exactly the same in antiquity, but the way humans described and understood it was very different.
If an ancient Greek, Babylonian, or Egyptian astronomer looked at the sky 2,000 to 5,000 years ago, they would see the exact same order of brightness. However, three fascinating details differed back then:
1. The Word "Planet" Meant Something Else: In antiquity, the Sun and the Moon were classified in the exact same category as Venus, Jupiter, Mars, Mercury, and Saturn. The Greeks called them all asteres planetai (wandering stars) because they crawled across the background sky, while the distant deep-space stars remained fixed in place.
2. The Scale Numbers Were Inverted: When Hipparchus created the first catalog around 130 BC, he didn't have decimals, telescopes, or negative numbers.He lumped the brightest stars (like Sirius and Canopus) together with the planets into "1st Magnitude" (meaning first-class brightness).The faintest stars were "6th Magnitude".The Sun, Moon, and Venus were recognized as far more brilliant than any 1st-magnitude star, but they simply lacked a mathematical way to calculate how much brighter they were.
3. Star Positions and Values Shift over Millennia On a human historical timeline (a few thousand years), the positions and brightness of the stars are nearly identical. However, over millions of years, stars move closer or further from our solar system, causing their apparent magnitudes to change completely:Sirius is currently rushing toward our solar system at 5.5 km/s and gets slightly brighter every century. Around 100,000 years ago, it wasn't even the brightest star in the night sky—Canopus was!
Well, the ptolemean list has no alphabetic sequence visible in it,
but after we set aside the Sun, the Moon and the Venus (the three brightest objects considered special)
we get this sequence of brightnesses: Jupiter, Mars, Mercury, Sirius, Canopus, Saturn, which is pretty alphabetic. IU of Jupiter is the vowel part, M&M of Mars&Mercury is the labial part, SCS are lingual.
One vowel, Two labial, Three lingual. Which reminds how they often are: VW and БВ make labial double, and russians didn't have Ё after Е in the past.
vowel ~ value (we give our оценку, evaluation to the thing by colouring it differently with vowels:
радастна всё на А
веселье всё на Е
острожно осторожно всё на О
грустую тупую скучную всё на У (винительный падеж, здесь этот термин подходит)
винить белую ~ винить белу "you!", "ooh, you!"
тихие всё на и, и словно зарезервировано можественным числом, союзом &, родительным падежом. белой - й это и есть и, руки - в этом слове она явно. Я и... значит я и моя семья, особенно мои родители.
дать на? дать Е, веселье, дательный потому что даёт.
А тоже окончание винительного падежа: козла
О тоже окончание винительного падежа: кого? его!
У таже окончание винительного падежа: сатану
мужик когда его обвиняют орёт? радуется? ржёт? АТАК, атакует. а баба сразу у..
У окончание дательного падежа в мужском роде: козлу
У окончание дательного падежа и на имена заканчивающиеся на о, типа кто: кому? ему.
Е окончание дательного падежа в женском роде: сатане (но и диме, не только маше, женщине, мужчине тоже, но они все оканчиваются на А в именительном.
потому ли что бабе весело когда ей дают, удовольствие ей доставляют, радуют, одаривают. А мужик сразу расстраивается что ему либа работу дали либо заплатить придётся? Если бабе дали, то бабе yeah, мужику ooh.
.
