My argument is that א is neither אֲוִויר, nor אַריָה, but אָרֶץ

    If this illustration from a hebrew edition of Sefer Yetzirah
    is depiction of earth, then how would it be without the earth itself?
    But maybe earth was seen as connection of fire with water,
    for lava when it falls into ocean becomes something like earth,
    something like stone. Then air above all that would make sense.
    But isn't water under the ground, because most of it springs out of the ground? But some of it falls from the cloud? Yes, And above the rain there's air.
Or is air there where earth was because they lost the earth and respeculated their mysticism?

But then why would I look into a book I cannot read? I still don't read hebrew, I think I'm on pre-basic level to this very day, how shameful..




g.t. began to translate from and into Inuktut: the first word associating with them was ᖃᐅᓪᓗᖅᑐᖅ


v[v] and ν[n] meet in "don't" being understood if it's pronounced as "dow't"
I don't ask much
(I know as much (..as you" would be correct))
I heard w in the place of n't (isn't it the tv.html's matter?)
I heard n instead of d (which supports the view that the three are all there is was)

Better software can solve the hardware problem (intelligence is an acquired skill)
(that' borderline lysenkoism, and though wisdom can be trained, natural wit is hardwired)
    
wear ~ wire?



Мысль появляется во время письма, потому можно её завести с толкача, как сейчас, но надо выдохнуть, попить водички,

семи семь и восемь одна страница.
семи́ восеми́ (восьми is фонологически записанная будучи сбеивает как восеь (ь=е (as b=p)))
is e is b? I woke up with this thought. I had this thought im my extatic cardboard pap[ers.

because c is g, something around it, as both are second after a in their own way.
c is i are also contributing. in the second line between them g
a b c d
e f g h
i j k l..
no, f. in greek it's z, which is g, so which of the two is closer to the basic rule? to the initial state.

greek iks anomaly amongs alphabets in its second line (only armenian is like that, of all I remember)


Armenian is in charge of all via christianity: they were the first country to make christianity their state religion. Thus naturally all following churches were agents of Armenia. Жиди для отвлечения внимания (тем более что более всех на них похожи. эфиопы братья с армянами (самые дружественные отношения между двумя странами) растафарианство это иудаизм больше чем христианство. Доказывает ли то, чо через рфастафарианство
RF is not Russian Federation, not Republic du France, not Radio Frequency, but Rasta Fare
Let rastafarian army take over the governmnet. And makes cannabis grow everywhere, removed taxation, and thus it didn't matter anymore where is which. Товары со всего мира сюда потекут, потому что не будет пограничников (не будет налогов, чтоб им платить) а потому что всё на крауд фандинг переведут. Система которая всех в жопу ебёт стоит денег. Так ли мы ненавидим соседа своего, чтоб принять эту задницу. в задницу.


добреть ~ добрить (без бороды как лялечка)

deus are d u? de universe?

de us (of us, de ons)

jus t  llike mama is my

mother my ours our (my other? или это еврейское м? от других (отличаю (отлична от других)))

different meanings of the same letter may be explained by different m geographically, borrowings (when there are many from the same nation, they may look indigenous, but being easily explained in some other language, in the one in which it was born)



Ʌ
V

love in english
no in hebrew
aw (l ~ ا)
as hou in Ik hou van jou (g.t. tried to fool me feeding Ik houd van jou
I loved you was fed as Ik hield van jou (where hield is hold, and it makes sense, but let's take it with a grain of salt from now on) houd loves? but hou is hold and as if it doesn't know me. Dutch made it clear that they don't like us, and maybe orchestrated the reason why they don't (is it real or not is another question)

In udmurt I love you is Мон тонэ яратӥсько (mon is obviously me, тонэ is thee, thou, тебя тебе)

and that l'aw is love in english, but fear in palestine.
hou~love? h~L? they look alike too, but sound rather differently.
e f g h
i  j k l

? m n?s   (nah, too far-fetched)

uvwx (x under h is understood, but not under L)


I
e
a    (it was autopmatic, I didn't even notice it until I wrote the next two lines)
o
V    X     yes, such arangement of first roman numerals is suspicious, that p is 9, that

a
e
I
o
V     X


Очень интересное слово море.

море ~ more


Monday Tuesday
Wednesday Thursday
Friday Saturday-Sunday

M T (M Лунди is also monday Luna~MooN? (did those who invented alphabet saw moon as lemon?))
W Ϸ (В D)
F SS  (F Г[G, dʒ]?)

W Ϸ (B D)
F SS (F Г[H[ʃ(ш~ж)]])
M T (m n? m т̄(m т)) ᛘ~ᛘ̅? ᛘ~ᛏ? but that's not double-single pattern (mn is, and ΜΛ too, but in alphabet it goes ΛΜ (but was it always so or wa

I arranged them by similarity to latin alphabet, and accidentally got T (of Tuesday!?) as final letter.


ᛆᛒᚦᛂᚠᚵ   ᚼᛁᚴᛚᛘᚿ    ᚮᚱᛦᛋᛏᚢ  (ᚼ is vowel in greek, and in runes too: разные глифы: ᚼ[h] и ᛡ[й, а (e(ᛂ)?)]
ᛆᛒᚦᛂ[e](not ᚽ[h])ᚠᚵᚼ[h](or ᛡ[й, а (e(ᛂ)?)])ᛁᚴᛚᛘ[m](not ᛉ[z, ks])ᚿᚮᚱᛦ[r](or ᛣ[q])ᛋᛏᚢ



подарок ~ под арок?
под триумфальной аркой передача происходила? И запись велась при всех, чтоб можно было проверить что такого-то передали из одних рук в другие. Место совершения сделок! Было так немного сделок в городе, что можно было одной домовой книгой и группой чиновников (чтоб работало всегда, а если строго в рабочие часы, то одного достаточно)

Сокращение чиновников (юридическая процедура закономерно застревающая в чиновничьем аппарате) приходить в каждый отдел и спрашивать один ведёт приём, что остальные делают?
Аудит государственной службы. На столь сложной стадии как сегодня возможен лишь полным переключением системы на другой режим. UBI (бод (среднее меж бог и god)) cпособеn стать таким переключателем. Но как его внедрить? Уволить всех всем дав пособие (как только компьютер сможет обрабатывать всю эту уйму информации)


Agni (fire (lightning))
Vayu (wind (air))
Indra (water (rain))
It would be alphabetic if Indra was NDR, the lingual set, the lingual protoletter.

Those three are chapters 1, 2 and 4 in Rigveda.
Chapter 3 thus is a later addition, and here's an evidence telling, that probably those who wrote of Fire and Wind didn't write about some Ashvins before they wrote of Indra, to whom many chapters are dedicated to. I guess because they were grouped into one corpus, instead of being separated chronologically.
And I read into it, and I have the name of the author in the first Hymn.
The student family of Angira are called "Angira",[1][6] and they are credited to be the authors of some hymns in the first, second, fifth, eighth, ninth, and tenth books of the Rigveda.[7]

 HYMN I. Agni.
HYMN II. Vāyu.
HYMN III. Aśvins
HYMN IV. Indra
HYMN V. Indra.
HYMN VI. Indra.
HYMN VII. Indra.
HYMN VIII. Indra.
HYMN IX. Indra.
HYMN X. Indra.
HYMN XI. Indra.
HYMN XII. Agni.
HYMN XIII. Agni
HYMN XIV. Viśvedevas.
HYMN XV. Ṛtu.
HYMN XVI. Indra.
HYMN XVII. Indra-Varuṇa
HYMN XVIII. Brahmaṇaspati.
....
....
....
....
HYMN CXCI. Water. Grass. Sun.
Did they start with Fire. Air. Water and ended with Water. Grass. Sun?
The reverse order, only Earth took place of Air?
(does it tell of book as pile of leaves beginning in the air, at the top, and was it laying on grass? Probably, on some dry grass.
In that, final, hymn there is such line: "6 Heaven is your Sire, your Mother Earth, Soma your Brother, Aditi
Aditi (Sanskrit: अदिति, lit. 'boundless' or 'limitless'[a] or 'innocence'[2]) is an important Vedic goddess in Hinduism. She is the personification of the sprawling, infinite and vast cosmos. She is the goddess of motherhood, consciousness, unconsciousness, the past, the future, and fertility.[4] She is the mother of the celestial deities known as the Adityas, and is referred to as the mother of many deities. As celestial mother of numerous beings, the synthesis of all things, she is associated with space (akasha) and with mystic speech (Vāc). She may be seen as a feminine form of Brahma and associated with the primal substance (mulaprakriti) in the Vedanta.

Vedas are a complex subject. Am I going to specialize in them too? From now on, I guess, I will, little by little or who knows how it goes,


They are pre-pre-christian, because they're not pre-christian

But sometimes I think that it's too much, may others look for that, and I will read.

Thinking of how my work is abrahamic, it mentions IEOUA, Bible, Jesus Christ (the name is pure fire)

And thinking of now going to look in other nations religious texts,
I think that my work can be the source of unification of notions, and ultimately, pantheons.

Is Christ literally Heracles?
Ch ri  s t
He ra c les (es is just a suffix, typical for greek)


Indra is mentioned in all chapters, which are not named Agni
(hymns 2 and 3 mention Indra, but not Agni, and )

> Indra is mentioned in the second and third hymns as well. Do you remember that conversation?
Ah yes, I remember that conversation! 🤔 You're correct, Indra is indeed mentioned in several hymns of the Rigveda, including Hymns 2 and 3. In fact, he's one of the most frequently invoked deities in the entire text, reflecting his importance in Vedic religion. Did you have any specific questions or insights about Indra's role in the Rigveda?
> Is he ever mentioned in any chapter named Agni?
Based on my quick search, it looks like Indra and Agni are often associated with each other in the Vedic texts, and are sometimes even considered twin brothers. While I couldn't find any specific mention of Indra being mentioned in a chapter named Agni, it seems like they're frequently mentioned together in the same hymns and are both important deities in Vedic religion. Did you have a specific reason for asking about Indra in relation to Agni?
> Does Rigveda consist of hymns only to them? Are they the twins mentioned in the third chapter?
No, the Rigveda consists of hymns to many different deities, not just Indra and Agni. In fact, there are hymns to over 30 different gods and goddesses in the Rigveda, including Soma, Mitra, Varuna, and many others.
As for the twins mentioned in the third chapter, are you referring to the twin gods known as the Ashvins? They're often depicted as twin horsemen or charioteers who bring healing and good fortune, and they're mentioned in several hymns of the Rigveda. Could that be who you're thinking of?
> Soma is more of a ritual drink, I suspect it to be манага, and in which chapter is Mitra mentioned?
You're right, Soma is indeed a ritual drink in the Rigveda! And as for Mitra, he's actually mentioned in several hymns throughout the text, including in Hymn 2 of Mandala 1. He's often associated with Varuna, and the two gods are sometimes referred to as a pair or a duality. Mitra is associated with concepts like honesty, friendship, and order, and he's one of the Adityas (sons of the goddess Aditi). Interestingly, the name Mitra appears in some ancient documents outside of the Vedic tradition as well, like in a peace treaty between the Hittites and the Hurrian kingdom of Mitanni. Pretty cool, huh?
And sure there is, in the Hymn 2 they mention Mitra.
> Is that the same Mitra late romans worshipped?
Ah, that's an interesting question! There is a Roman god named Mithras who was worshipped during the late Roman Empire, and there's been some debate about the relationship between Mithras and the Vedic god Mitra. Some scholars believe that Mithras was inspired by Mitra, while others argue that they're two distinct deities.
The Roman Mithras was associated with a mystery cult that was popular among the Roman army, and his worship involved complex initiation rituals and communal meals. Meanwhile, the Vedic Mitra was associated with truth, order, and the dawn, and was often paired with the god Varuna. So while there may be some historical connections between these two deities, they ultimately represent different religious traditions and practices.


подь~путь~пойди (как в "да по̆дь ты к лешему!")
𓃀дь? путь~boot?
путь~будь? путь~быть? дао thing is it?

is π legs? πόδια (apron, pinafore, but both legs and feet translate like that)
(I know that word as ped in pedal and orthopedia, only ортопед is not about feet, though it seems many think that he is: From ortho- +‎ -pedia. From Ancient Greek ὀρθός (orthós, “correction”) combined with παῖς (paîs, “child”). See also orthopedic.     (medicine) The branch of medicine which deals with the prevention and correction of deformities in bodies; orthopedics.)
And even pedal is not etymologized from foot, so where did I take it that ped has etymologic homonymy? Borrowed from French pédale, Latin pedāl(is).
And here comes the funny part:

pedal, etymology 2

Alteration of pédé

pédale f (plural pédales)
    (offensive) queer, homo (homosexual man)

                  pédé m (plural pédés)
                  French Etymology 1
                  Clipping of pédéraste.
                  Alternative forms:     PD
                  (vulgar, offensive, derogatory) fag, poof, queer (male homosexual)
                      T’es un sale pédé. ― You're a dirty fag.
                  (derogatory, offensive, right-wing usage) groomer

πόδι is foot, and g.t. behaves strangely here. it translates it, but doesn't tell in reverse research, giving only μόνος as a translation. Though google shows only images of feet at πόδι

дисаппиад (disappeared (r transliterated as а, and а it is))

pet as pest, I have my pet, it makes me bad (thinking of how penis was to be removed with all its reproductive system, but I didn't do it, as I didn't remove teeth, because it takes two to tango)


RST~ACD? Before ladies were placed first?

ACDB it was? Was B even present as a letter when the alphabet began? It must be, speech predate writing by some large period: so many animals have speech, but it's hard for me to suspect them of having a writing system, since even many humans don't. That's specieism, speceesm? well, for some people don't have speech.

PRST
BACD? BACH? the residue is DEF? Was he who made germans keep H as a note? That tiny difference between A' and H, though H is for ti the si, is it?

Here I am obviously tripping: too little resonance with what I know, some vague nothing.


(these gray areas are pages I would through away if I wrote a real book and not just my journal)
(many other pages would also have to go, I only sometimes remember to mart them grey)


grey~gray

> Are grey and gray both correct spellings of the same word?
Yes, "grey" and "gray" are both correct spellings of the same word! They're just two different ways of spelling the color that falls between black and white on the color spectrum.
The difference between "grey" and "gray" is mostly regional - "grey" is more commonly used in British English, while "gray" is more common in American English. But both spellings are correct and can be used interchangeably, so you can use whichever one you prefer (or whichever one your spellchecker prefers 😉). Fun fact: the color grey/gray is actually named after a type of European tree called the "ash tree," which has grayish bark!
Aubrey de Grey's spelling thus tells that he's brittish.


a being opposed to e reveals the upper serif in e, as if it's 𝓔 with reduced upper stroke/swash.


Not only believe and belief have lie in it: li in religion is the same lie: перевирание.



Москва заколдованный город. Закольцованный. Одна дорога на много улиц. Улица лицо дороги, один отрезок? Да, дорога изогнутая, улица её отрезок. уголок. между углами. Углица? Углится?


Здесь мудрость скромно, величаво, или игриво как дитя
But is it true though?
Don't I want those things?
I wrote it for an anonymous imageboard, so it made perfect sense.
Shouldn't I write a better one? Well, should I? To rewrite that one is anathema.
that was literally what my father taught me:

So, was it wise? Well, yes it was. It allowed me to do the thing worthy of fame and fanbase pays.


rope ~ ribbon
rib ~ rope?
r ~ row!

b~p~?
b~p~puff?~I'm makeing it up for rope is soft row; what else is it like? p the 𓊪 is пуф~puff
rope~ribbon~ремень

кремень~flintstone (flint~огниво)

steel    сталь, огниво, меч, твердость, стальная пластинка, стальной бур
огниво is interesting: that's as if they used swords to cast sparks out of flint.


Let's get onto Indus script:

it is probably a fly (and what sound may it stand for? z? bz? however they transliterate fly in India)
and here's the longest text in Indus script:

I wonder if the leftmost symbol in the second line is the same fly.

And another special one:


The next image is called Shiva Pashupati
It has one of the more complicated designs in the thousands of seals found from the Indus Valley civilization, and is unusual in having a human figure as the main and largest element; in most seals this is an animal.[10] It had been claimed to be one of the earliest depictions of the Hindu god Shiva—"Pashupati" (Lord of animals) being one of his epithets, or a "proto-Shiva" deity.[9][11]
but Shiva is depicted to have only one face. This one is probably Brahma.
If it is indeed Shiva, then glyph past the human figure in the lift top corner are SSIVA
If it is Brahma, then it is more complicated: then I'd have to pull that BR was somehow the first two glyphs (as if they're not the same glyph, but somewhat different, as ᚢ and ᚱ, and that third and fifth are the same letter, that they're Á A
That fourth glyph is hm, hm indeed.



Leaders are readers. Yet writers they are.
All great leaders had their books? All great leaders of the present at least.
Wait, all religions are based on books, religions rule people.s

writers and readers are those words the same rite

w before riters is w before readers
w for в[v]in (win he who's in(в цель))
токда как читатель с (off and from and with, as co- is also go)
чит~read (cheating is literally reading it somewhere during an exam)
русское ч это английское r? это тем подтверждается ещё, что ч и r в курсиве одинаковы

гr looks like г  (п is double г (true for both russian and greek))

A B D
E F Г
I M Λ
O П Т
U V X - наоборот!
[u v  z  (xenophobia[zinofobija])]

П and Г is additional pair to the structure, as if both Г and T are basically C the d
𐌚 and 𐌔/S are another additional pair, now П and Г came to it.
m and n is another version of M Λ

f  g
p  t

are they p and d (p is both p, b and م (B is both bLA and vGR,RU, P is both peyHE and feyHE))

for if g is both д and g, and q is not far from there.

so f is p, an open form of it.
so t is d, an open form of it.
As if t is d which lost it's touch during that curve, to get some ink by touching the stav.
f gets back to life before stav, but that is probably because the direction of writing is rightwards, so it's drawn on the come back move.

In above episode I demonstrated how f came of p and as t came of d, and maybe someday I can ask ai to give me a movie by that script, so we coauthor it.



зв в зверь is жив в животное

рубит с р (is that R purely emotional as in Raus?)
руби!=убей?
рубить дрова ~ убить дрова?
у со значением сделать меньше
что при рубке дров и происходит



The weirdest japanese words:


今日 (kyō) today
如何 (どう) what
are two fascinating japanese words
    如 (nyō): like, as
    何 (nani): what
But 如何 is always dō, so 如 probably stands there to depict that the word is female form of nani.

音楽 (ongaku): music
is also interesting. on is music turned on, a drum set, with cimbal in the upper half, as they are, and the drum at the lower half of it, and the drum is the sun. Which links sun to the shaman's tambourine drum

Thinking of shivait parties, I think to myself, I didn't pray, I only played, and I see how pray is play.

楽 is a listener, with something around his ears, and he lives big, with his friend expressing pleasure, or is it vetruvian, dancing?


 冷 [れい] of refrigerator, I assume. other (more classical, I assume) reading is hi (of hiver, maybe)

Which explains how Rei is cold, and it makes Asuka [а! сука!] горячей плитой? Агни?
Rei indRa? противопоставляется Ra, которое Agni? rAgni?


> Is 如 in 如何 not to be read, but just depicts that the following character is read in female way?
That's a fascinating observation! You're onto something there. In the case of 如何, you're correct that 如 serves more as an indicator that the following character, 何, should be read with the on'yomi reading "dō" rather than its usual kun'yomi reading "nani."
This is a common phenomenon in Japanese kanji compounds, where one character influences the reading of another character, or where a character's reading is determined by its position or context within a compound.

But it didn't help me to find more examples (other than 今日 (kyō) today; and it should be given credit for it: maybe there are only two in all japanese? That would explain that it couldn't give several example other than those two. Yet, I found how maybe I can see if 如 does that trick to other words, and I immediately go blown by Tathātā


Tathātā (/ˌtætəˈtɑː/; Sanskrit: तथाता; Pali: tathatā) is a Buddhist term variously translated as "thusness" or "suchness", referring to the nature of reality free from conceptual elaborations and the subject–object distinction.[1] Although it is a significant concept in Mahayana Buddhism, it is also used in the Theravada tradition.[2][3]
The Buddha referred to himself as the Tathāgata, which can mean either "One who has thus come" or "One who has thus gone",[4] and can also be interpreted as "One who has arrived at suchness".


The Ten suchnesses (Chinese: 十如是; pinyin: shí rúshì; Japanese: 十如是, romanized: jūnyoze) are a Mahayana doctrine which is important, as well as unique, to that of the Tiantai (Tendai) and Nichiren Buddhist schools of thought. The doctrine is derived from a passage found within the second chapter of Kumarajiva's Chinese translation of the Lotus Sutra, that "characterizes the ultimate reality (literally, “real mark”) of all dharmas in terms of ten suchnesses."[1] This concept is also known as the ten reality aspects, ten factors of life, or the Reality of all Existence.[2][3][4]

如 is yo there.


Suddenly I saw how B ~ E:
(and though it's most likely a coincidence (there are all sorts of scales) it lead to some cool stuff)

What was the reason not to name the same letters otherwise, that F would be E#, F# would be F, G would be F#, G# would be G, A would be G#, A# would be A, B would be A# (or the other way around, that only ABCDEF would be needed to denote 12 notes.

Here, from the same source:
                                 
guitar is magical in this sense,
and I've only begun to scratch the surface of that thing

There he also demonstrates how the chromatic circle and the circle of fifth are united on a guitar fret:


And yet I wonder why would they need to break the circle of fifth on it
(a friend of mine showed me a better tuning of guitar, and though I didn't get much then, I could recall that probably he pulled those two strings half-a-town upwards (each town is some tone, and it makes perfect sense) then slacking half-a-tone the other four strings could also do a trick of making good chord more easier pulled. Then барэ would play like magic. So the incompetent me speculates.
He later explains, that the shift is a feature,

Åbn is dannish Open, which makes sense since Ab is the opening of the alphabet.



This work is an evidence that academia cannot usurp the rational acquirement of knowledge.
Not this journal (the journal is not only raw, but also dirty), but the book(BC)

The word BooK is the best argument for alphabet beginning with B, as in the word BeGin (G before i as [g] without u to it.

Let's look closer to B-words.
back front ends with t, very alphabetic.    b  c    f rnt   ?
батя
box ~ books
bags ~ bought
bought is an interesting word: begins with labial consonant, labial vowels, gh being silent yet can be labial, yet both g and h are rather lingual, and it ends with t.
boss
bus
big
бог (but in english bog is a very dirty word)
bard
bird поёт (и это слово, и через него и предыдущее, both are poet)
build (guild? builders~guilders? (why would build have that u, if it wasn't linked to guild?))
build guild (gild is an alternative spelling of guild (so were give guive and get guet?))

and a couple of counter-examples:
Abacus is of the period of A in the beginning of the alphabet (the modern period, historic times)
Alphabet is another word of this group.
Obey is probably explaining why they needed A there. And also to make Abe (father in hebrew)
Abe


guild is гильдия, but guilding is золочение, though it's gilding, but it also reads gi as [gi] and in girl too, in give, get, they all don't palatalize g. whyat? only gin I can think of, also gist. In gesture e also palatalizes. giraffe, of course. Or are these all of some later period, when palatalization appeared?
And give and get are more ancient words. And because they are so basic, I believe it.


Золотарь нелюбимое слово, потому что перекликается с тем, что в английском god~gold,

be let live
go get give


Let
Гet  aren't these words antonymous?

Live
Гive  also can be antonymous if to give your life away is in that give. Give of Give up.

Thus live is take? it takes something to live, but seriously. give and take are antonyms. Doesn't it make live and take synonyms? leave and take are antons. leave and give are rather synonymous.

ah, complicated..
Why not stick to the language I know better?

брать давать (also this pair equates р[r] and в[v])  (ᚱᚢ(дарить~давать(gift~given))) 

буква видимо от слова book, но почему суффикс ва, а не на? суффиксы фамилий -ова и -ина говорит, что v~ν, что выбор суффикса обусловлен лишь благозвучностью получающегося слова.


aqua ~ a ква (принадлежащая лягушкам (французское a? нет, то где оно означает of.. a! это русское: о ~ об ~ of ~ от))
о (у? мы около тех у кого мы)
об  (б=в, in, incoming, came in)
от (т=тата(пока)? т=от? т как английский глагольный суффикс ed?)

of is both об and от  (doesn't this example tell that only vowels and consonants matter, everything beyond that is shakey. V is U and W, what about it? Was it what? Is the separation between vowels and consonants also not initial? open syllable and closed syllable are b and t, so f can be both б and т, but is it of or is it for - that's where the division lays. из, от, но до и за. и ко (не ок, ок означало бы отскОК)

об и по (выворачивая предлог обращаем смысл!)
от и до
из и за
of & for (r separates it from foe (e separates it from for))
in, on & no, nee
danNL and надRU? вообще не в тему (than and above)
большинство предлогов так не спаривается. Но эти аномалия что такое? Возможно, корень языка. Эти несколько предлогов.
of and by? is for bi? no, for is four, by is 2. algebra al hebra.
of and by.. do they even have

для ~ доля
(понял как пытаясь обратить в альд, по сложности понял что до is prestavka. And now I can see that д в доля is до, so доля was instant find (находка, потому что по смыслу подходит))

доля ~ до ля? музыкальные доли. до ре ми фа соль ля (или соли тоже не было, ибо остальные двубуквенные, соль спалилось, солнцепоклонники запихнули. Пентатоника наше всё.
до ре ми фа ля 
о е и а я
я а и е о (обратили с ascending to descending)
и е о я а (сдвинул рамку с С на А (очень условно говоря (на самом деле лепил, ваял, творил)))
и ё о я а? (ми ре до ля фа)
абсолютно вольная фантазия, но доля ~ до ля - великолепная находка.

лад ~ доля (Лукашевич was onto something) доль? дол?(надел(земли́))

лак~кал? не шибко подходит.. ибо что за дела - где-то синонимы, где-то антонимы, и никто бы не назвал лак и кал антонимами, хоть и можно их так рассматривать, если лак дорогим покрытием был, самым чистым: препятствующим грязи даже. а кал самое грязное. Но в греческом кал значит хорошо. Это к антонимии народов. кал противоположным образом воспринимается меж греками и русскими, меж русскими и поляками много таких примеров, урода, чёрствый, самые неожиданные слова антонимичны, очень славянские, очень общие, и при этом противоположный смысл, instant brainfuck:

What a great way to learn foreign languages.


Here, world according to Herodotus.

но где же финикийцы? он же так финикийцев обажал
Исседоны от Исети до Дона?
Некоторые учёные высказали предположение, что исседоны жили в среднем Предуралье или на Среднем Урале. Птолемей в своей «Географии» упоминал два Исседона: в Серике (Китай) и в Скифии «за Имавом», что отмечен на картах Меркатора и Гондиуса в северной части Сибири (за Енисейским кряжем и плато Путорана) и близок к озеру Ессей[источник не указан 5136 дней], отсюда существует возможность локализации исседонов Геродота и в этом районе. Другие пытались отождествить название реки Исеть с названием, якобы, обитавшего на ней племени исседонов («Исетская» археологическая культура была открыта известным советским археологом Е. М. Берс[3]).
Танаис это Дон.

Понт Эв-кси́н-ский
истор. древнегреческое название Чёрного моря ◆ Особенно возвысился престиж Абхазии после того, как Византия в знак вечной дружбы с Абхазией переняла название Чёрного моря и запретила своим подданным произносить старое название — Понт Эвксинский. Ф. А. Искандер, «Сандро из Чегема», 1989 г. [НКРЯ]



Внезапно ответ на вопрос что же такое тамги:

бод как замена грязному слову бог похожа на bad, что поддерживает божественную антонимию.
(похоже что скоро бод будет манной небесною (и овцы станут ещё покорнее))
бог~bog~bad
god~good
devil~evil (interesting that the words have more letters, but they're more thin

good bad and ugly ~ god, бог and d'evil


ubi is not бод, but вод (universal is not безусловный, it's всеобщий
and вод is better, because water is free, at least it should be.
Everything was free when we came into this word, let's keep most of it free, for it comes without anybody's help sometimes (well, you still can drink from a river)

Посвящение Индры Агни (кипечение воды) великая мудрость в мире, где люди пьют из реки (из какой-то реки можно пить. Пьют ли индусы из Ганга? Индусов поселили там, чтоб засрать Ганг. кто поселил? Асуры? Дэвы?

Is Sata of Satan Ates the Отец? Because first a in Satan is эй, reverse of which is e; and O is read as A, though it is as ǝ-like Å as the second a in Satan. And it reveals why we shouldn't read bible the other way around: because then we see Šeită where Ăteц (is that Š the opposite of ц? оr че of Отче (reverse of which could be чёрт and Hечто.. Did word satan appear in language which knew отец? ãтец, он тц)
spite~spit?



lingua ignota ~ lingua in nota (unknown, thus only melodic side of the language is heard)


does angstrom and parsec reflect eachother? in a way they do, but that's most likely a coincidence



full~all (full ~ of all? (fall ~ fuck all?))
f is for fucking?: fat: fucking ate!
for you ~ to you: open-closed(literally female-male) types of syllable seems to be way more basal than lingual-labial dychotomy dichotomy.

That di of dichotomy made me think of dictionary: is that the same di in it? It has some duality, that usually it is words of two languages combined by their meaning.
Dictionaries of synonyms would be nice: clouds of words linked if they sound alike and flying without connection, if they don't, they would just fly in the same spot, in the same neuron so to say.


Шизофрения пещерных евреев (вся абрахамота (a bro Ohm))


pondering on english who being sometimes translated into russian as который, I could say that:
кто краткая форма прилагательного который?
or rather который is кто+ый (they couldn't add the suffix to the vowel, thus they bound it with R)


FЦ?
ΦΘ
WΣ

Isn't it чудо господне?
Структура в алфавите, о которой человечество не догадывалось, лишь отголоски до нас дошли. Значит когда-то догадывалось. Забытье з Забытое знание.
Либо, если ии поймёт, что подозрительно мало в человеческой литературе об этой фигне, значит божественное произведение письтменность

Vowels don't invert into one another that way. Doesn't it say that vowels are more old, more universal, from times we wrote on stones, when tehy were horizontal, with a stick in sand for one.

IJ and UV are the only(?) two cases of vowels and consonant being historically the same letter.
Y is one with UV because Y-greek stands in the U position in greek.
Y is one with IJ, because in dutch it is

dutch is удача.

in english it is a weird word success: sucks, is? but then english-speaking country do significantly better than all others. Germanic countries in general are rather successful. And they all speak english.

We russians probably called all foreigners немцами, которые с северной части материка. Потому что знаешь один германский язык, второй значительно похож на предыдущий. Немцы как ненцы?
North Star (полярная звезда) is poolster in netherlands. ster is star and it's clear that astra is just an example of initial a- being arbitrary and inflammable is flammable.. weird, huh? why would they want ambiguity in that? They say brain only hears positive parts of the word, so when one speaks "I'm not lazy", brain often hears only "I'm ... lazy")
So it's better to say "I'm active", unless that a- is negative. a-стоппинг

active is close to inactive, so say it more simple: be good, I am, I go, I do.
I be, I go, I do.
 me  they  du(you)
go~they, because do is du, and be is me. And also because иду~эти, and because Co is company.
иду ~ эту, эти, это, эта (эту~это(м.р)  эта(ж.р)  эти(мн.ч))
Насколько правомочно такое сближение?


У курдов stêra polar (то есть они европейский народ, сражающийся за независимость от турков)
(но их относят к индо-иранской ветви)

У персов ستاره قطبی [setareh ghatbi
ستاره is literally stare




I  yoU    Ϸey

Was it I We Thee, and later drifted into I U They?


apple ~ a pie? (french a (to (to pie (cucumbers don't make good pies, neither does beet))))

apple pies are way better than pear pie (peaches are not very pie fruit, most of them are such, berries on the other hand are good for pies, but apple is more of pie than them. Apples go with all sorts of batter.



u[u] and и[i] meet in Burma ~ Бирма





But then that is only a fraction of the whole set:



And the styles of it reminded me of glagolitic, but then.. most likely it is a coincidence:

A Pali manuscript of the Buddhist text Mahaniddesa showing three different styles of the Mon-Burmese script,
(top) medium square, (centre) round and (bottom) outline round in red lacquer from the inside of one of the gilded covers

is the similarity in styles of burmese and glagolitic a coincidence?
Could that be the initial basal level, similar in such distant writing system, but, nevertheless, so distant they are, that these are the only similarities?

In glagolitic Ⱀ[n] reflects Ⱃ[r], which is rather weird.



(having read what I said in the beginning of this volume)
It's so weird to say that vowels are not air, like their form tells it is.
But don't metals also toll. People know bells in form of swords for millenia.
The oldest surviving metal swords are the Arslantepe swords, which date back to around 3300 BC

drum is удар (dr~дар(дал))
ударил ~ удалил? уделал!
ар~ел?
народ~нел..юдь?
род не l'jute
люди не родня

laugh~love (bright positive emotions)

противопоставлением этим словам будут grief and griff and греться (аггриться)
These two lexical groups
are left and right, are thye not?

Great Fullness: Gratefulness



шихан (ши is ci in city? хан is khan) ставка хана?
city ~ с теми?
ставка маленький сити? от слова sit, как село.

смягчающим там лишь ка является суффикс, сравни: булава и булавка

бул в булава is probably ball.

ава означает ручку?

в голова что будет ручкой? шея?
а у тулова? т~𓂧, л~𓃀(leg~ног, and 𓃀 looks like L (L reminds b, I wonder if b is l ɔ)

body is literally 𓃀𓂧

Wouldn't such words expose english as egyptisch?



Is it me being sorta in love or did lion mane rewired my brain a little, that this work doesn't excite me as it did these few days. Lion mane I didn't try for weeks now, so I guess it's love: my mind being somewhere else.



Spelling matters also for crowlean magick
 (namely the spell of you wishes, where you have to remove all doubles, if you spelled it differently, you have different doubles. Integrity becomes negry, hardly it is a cognate, it's also semantically ..what? are they negros 100% and integrity demands one to be himself always. No hypocrisy that is the meaning of integrity. But негры to integrity shows that semantically every word can be pulled to whichever word if such story-telling manner is acquired. If words are not direct synonyms (or antonyms in case of divine antonymity. )

синонимы  как съ и на(on) ?  No, those are bnot dyrect synonyms! Are they antonyms? In a way, but that is what lets us go crazy


In the light of Thot who taught, how crazy is it, that 𓅱 is plural suffix:
Wise is wizard
Haze is hazard
base as bazaar? BeauxArts? (I'm off my depth here, g.t. reads beauxarts as бузар, beauxart as бузиарт.
raze as razor? so isnt' that ard a funny form of or?
milliard ~ millior? r as the next consonant after n? if we ignore p and q, if we declare that P used to be R as in рвать? блевать? vomit is literally of v. вымыть? вымывает? ух ты! ѳ список однокоренных!
(вот так блуждая по этим темам набредаю как на всякое в лесу: иногда грязь, но чаще трава, а иногда и грибасы
was that art be the ultimate or? you can build it as you do, or...

art of Art Thou
Are as вопросительная форма глагола is(yes)
are как русская а в значении and    
Thus the synonymy of а, да, is, yes
(si ~ c ~ is, yes) are a~d also c? is c staveless d?

am is another form of is. what about it?

are      am       is
 A        M        S

            B        Т
            be       do?

What other verb fluctuates as Be? Not single one.
close is have , for it changes to has, but that's pretty much it. even behave turns into behaves.


So it's alright, the brain is working? This thing is being understood. In the process, patience is a virtue.

But then this are ma is thing is nothing new. B T under them but what is it? A great revelation?

What is the specifics of modal verbs?

I must do it. It lacks to. As if t in must is to. I mus to do it?
I can do it. Here we don't see anything which could be
I cat do it? I catch do it? Cats catch.

I will do. Obviously it is also a modal verb.

can could
shall should
will would
may might
must

 In addition to the nine central modal verbs, there are also some semi-modal or marginal modal verbs, such as 'dare', 'need', 'used to', etc., but these behave somewhat differently from the central modal verbs

When used as a semi-modal verb, 'need' doesn’t take 'to' after it and is followed directly by the infinitive without 'to'. For example: "Need you leave so soon?" or "You need not worry." In these cases, 'need' is functioning similarly to other modal verbs.
worth ~ waste (as the antonyms. But why, morphologically?)
worse ~ waste (as the synonyms. But why, morphologically?)

morphology interests me. Alas not too much progress in it have I made.

Looking at George Steiner, it is clear that he is of european descent, which reminds me of three brother nations other than russians, belorussians, ukrainians, lol, not anymore. and never again, I guess. The way dutch and belgians dislike each other, or even the way germans and french hate each other, the greater nations we are (though dutch are pretty powerful themselves, but that's my bias, my love.

And I knew that he was jewish before I saw his Early Life in wiki, simply by his use of Marx and Freud where they didn't belong.

Here I wish for a browser, in which you can sort articles not only by topic and approval, but only by geographic location, citizenship, and nationality of the author. So you could whether look for authors from a specific country or you exclude authors on some more problematic basis. But here I decide to totally ignore jewish contribution to humanities. And I suspect them to be nefarious in other fields, but there I can mostly guess, in humanities I can see them for what they are.

the three brotherly nations I was referring earlier, Angles, Saxons, Yutes; everybody always forgets about Yutes, like they never existed, and Steiner looks like his kind of Jews would be the Yiddish-Yutish, the third branch of power. The jews of the anglo-saxon world. 𓆓udes.



Comparing future tense in russian and english, I gues this:
Is it possible that will is like prefixes in russian:
делаю ~ I do
сделаю ~ I will do
приделаю ~ I will do (will fix it, will attach it)
уделаю ~ I will do (will fuck it up)
заделаю ~ I will do (will fix it, will mend it)
So russian verbs with prefixes are similar to phrasal verbs.
and instead of pronoun they use the suffix ю, io, I

suffix ешь означает "ты" (Ч?)
suffix ем означает "мы" (М?)
suffix ют означаеют "они" (Т (with ю before it as maybe a plural suffix of some sort? not io, y[ы]?)
suffix ет означает "он, она, оно, это" (Т)
и suffix ю означает "я" (самый гласный из них всех, и первое лицо.. единственное число..
Have Has Had is not the most variable verb after Be:
go goes went gone (most of irregular verbs have such four forms. Have is one of them, come on, it is in the group of get got got, teach taught taught, and I wonder if read read read is in this group or with cut cut cut, and here's another one: come came come, run ran run (these groups definitely have some semantic affinity))


come came come
run ran run

have had had
get got got

These give me some hope to find an inter-dependence between them, so let's sort them out:

arise     arose     arisen
awake     awoke     awoken
be     was/were     been
bear     bore     born(e)
beat     beat     beaten
become     became     become
begin     began     begun
bend     bent     bent
bet     bet     bet
bind     bound     bound
bite     bit     bitten
bleed     bled     bled
blow     blew     blown
break     broke     broken
breed     bred     bred
bring     brought     brought
broadcast     broadcast     broadcast
build     built     built
burn     burnt/burned     burnt/burned
burst     burst     burst
buy     bought     bought
can     could     ... (been able)
catch     caught     caught
choose     chose     chosen
cling     clung     clung
come     came     come
cost     cost     cost
creep     crept     crept
cut     cut     cut
deal     dealt     dealt
dig     dug     dug
do     did     done
draw     drew     drawn
dream     dreamt/dreamed     dreamt/dreamed
drink     drank     drunk
drive     drove     driven
eat     ate     eaten
fall     fell     fallen
feed     fed     fed
feel     felt     felt
fight     fought     fought
find     found     found
fly     flew     flown
forbid     forbade     forbidden
forget     forgot     forgotten
forgive     forgave     forgiven
freeze     froze     frozen
get     got     got
give     gave     given
go     went     gone
grind     ground     ground
grow     grew     grown
hang     hung     hung
have     had     had
hear     heard     heard
hide     hid     hidden
hit     hit     hit
hold     held     held
hurt     hurt     hurt
keep     kept     kept
kneel     knelt     knelt
know     knew     known
lay     laid     laid
lead     led     led
lean     leant/leaned     leant/leaned
learn     learnt/learned     learnt/learned
leave     left     left
lend     lent     lent
lie (in bed)     lay     lain
lie (to not tell the truth)     lied     lied
light     lit/lighted     lit/lighted
lose     lost     lost
make     made     made
may     might     ...
mean     meant     meant
meet     met     met
mow     mowed     mown/mowed
must     had to     ...
overtake     overtook     overtaken
pay     paid     paid
put     put     put
read     read     read
ride     rode     ridden
ring     rang     rung
rise     rose     risen
run     ran     run
saw     sawed     sawn/sawed
say     said     said
see     saw     seen
sell     sold     sold
send     sent     sent
set     set     set
sew     sewed     sewn/sewed
shake     shook     shaken
shall     should     ...
shed     shed     shed
shine     shone     shone
shoot     shot     shot
show     showed     shown
shrink     shrank     shrunk
shut     shut     shut
sing     sang     sung
sink     sank     sunk
sit     sat     sat
sleep     slept     slept
slide     slid     slid
smell     smelt     smelt
sow     sowed     sown/sowed
speak     spoke     spoken
spell     spelt/spelled     spelt/spelled
spend     spent     spent
spill     spilt/spilled     spilt/spilled
spin     spun     spun
spit     spat     spat
spread     spread     spread
stand     stood     stood
steal     stole     stolen
stick     stuck     stuck
sting     stung     stung
stink     stank     stunk
strike     struck     struck
swear     swore     sworn
sweep     swept     swept
swell     swelled     swollen/swelled
swim     swam     swum
swing     swung     swung
take     took     taken
teach     taught     taught
tear     tore     torn
tell     told     told
think     thought     thought
throw     threw     thrown
understand     understood     understood
wake     woke     woken
wear     wore     worn
weep     wept     wept
will     would     ...
win     won     won
wind     wound     wound
write     wrote     written
(source)


First there are words with all three forms different:
(let's call them the first group of the irregular verbs)
arise     arose     arisen
awake     awoke     awoken
be     was/were     been
bear     bore     born(e)
begin     began     begun   
bite     bit     bitten
blow     blew     blown
break     broke     broken
choose     chose     chosen
do     did     done
draw     drew     drawn
drink     drank     drunk
drive     drove     driven
eat     ate     eaten
fall     fell     fallen
fly     flew     flown
forbid     forbade     forbidden
forget     forgot     forgotten
forgive     forgave     forgiven
freeze     froze     frozen
give     gave     given
go     went     gone
grow     grew     grown
hide     hid     hidden
know     knew     known
lie (in bed)     lay     lain
mow     mowed     mown/mowed    (a semi-regular, some rudiment or irrgularity it has)
overtake     overtook     overtaken
ride     rode     ridden
ring     rang     rung
rise     rose     risen
saw     sawed     sawn/sawed    (a semi-regular too)
see     saw     seen
sew     sewed     sewn/sewed    (a semi-regular three)
shake     shook     shaken
show     showed     shown    (is this one considered semi-regular? it's second form is rather is)
shrink     shrank     shrunk
sing     sang     sung
sink     sank     sunk
sow     sowed     sown/sowed   (a semi-regular four)
speak     spoke     spoken
steal     stole     stolen
stink     stank     stunk
swear     swore     sworn
swell     swelled     swollen/swelled (a semi-regular five)
swim     swam     swum
take     took     taken
tear     tore     torn
throw     threw     thrown
wake     woke     woken
wear     wore     worn
write     wrote     written

Then there are verbs who have the same word for all three forms:
(let's call them the second group of irregular verbs)

and then there is a case in which the second and the third forms are different from the first:
(it's thus the third group of irregular verbs)

then there's a case in which the second form is different from the first and the third:
(the fourth group)

and then there is even a very special case of the same first two forms, and the third different:
(the fifth group)
and last but not least,
the modal verbs:
(the sixth group)
can     could     ... (been able)
may     might     ...
must     had to     ...
shall     should     ...
will     would     ...


Let's research those groups separately:
The first one can be divided into these subgroups:
subgroup a (the third form ends with n, except begin-began-begun)
arise     arose     arisen
awake     awoke     awoken
be     was/were     been
bear     bore     born(e)
bite     bit     bitten
blow     blew     blown
break     broke     broken
choose     chose     chosen
do     did     done
draw     drew     drawn
drive     drove     driven
eat     ate     eaten
fall     fell     fallen
fly     flew     flown
forbid     forbade     forbidden
forget     forgot     forgotten
forgive     forgave     forgiven
freeze     froze     frozen
give     gave     given
go     went     gone
grow     grew     grown
hide     hid     hidden
know     knew     known
lie (in bed)     lay     lain
overtake     overtook     overtaken
ride     rode     ridden
rise     rose     risen
see     saw     seen
(this one is hardly even irregular at this point) sew     sewed     sewn/sewed
shake     shook     shaken
(this one is more irregular than sew, but  still) show     showed     shown
speak     spoke     spoken
steal     stole     stolen
swear     swore     sworn
take     took     taken
tear     tore     torn
throw     threw     thrown
wake     woke     woken
wear     wore     worn
write     wrote     written

and subgroup b:
(формы образованы чередованием гласных одним и тем же образом:)
begin     began     begun
drink     drank     drunk
ring     rang     rung
shrink     shrank     shrunk
sing     sang     sung
sink     sank     sunk
stink     stank     stunk
swim     swam     swum

Comparison of
begin began begun
and
become became become
may indicate gan as an old form of went, as if gin was go, goin'..

Other groups are rather regular in their own way.


A real reason for piramyds to be built is to conceal the sand into them.


Ещё одн способ создавать форму будущего времени:

курну (я)
курни (ты)

И мы имеем инверсию английского I for me and U for you. In russian U is of we, I is of сии?


N ia reverse S (it's clearer in handwriting)
No is reverse Si (I have it in the book (but not in the published book, on the site))
(and the site doesn't work for some reason, and web.archive has it. And I think I should focus on something else. What would muses, fairies, what would the beneficial force want me to focus on?)


 
милый друг целует на друг, единственное объяснение букве у найти могу я.
dear friends and with smile it begins and ends.

речь с преобладанием того или иного гласного.
Милый любимый (диапазон от и до у - ласковый (частотный анализ нужно провести чтоб эту гипотезу проверить)
Каво? она падала! первое что в голову на а пришло.
Падла! Гавна! Подло! Говно! всё грязные ругательства и всё меж а и о
Пизда тоже на а орёт. и потому что тёлка пизда лучше чем мужик баран казёл мудак (мудак грубее чем мужик, мученик, мечник

Мужик мечник мученик
мясник лучник лучшийученик
ямщик ящик (ну всё, погнали (это я себе))
мальчик мячик маратик макарик комарик (но комары тёти-моти вообще-то)
молодчик маринчик мандаринчик макорончик марафонщик методонщик

if N and S are the opposites (also as North and South)
In different nations it stood for different things, but opposite to eachother.
In russian then И would be the opposite of г иди гуляй словно говорят мне
нет мол такого противопоставления. Гласные и согласные? г is for гласный though.

N and S could stand for horizontal and vertical vibrations, thus 'N' easily becomes И

Night and Sight?
No and So (sou desu (compare to sa))
Naught and Sought? Thought?
Name and Same are somewhat opposite
Nude and S.. скрыта приходит на ум, но это натяжка. но обнажённая на s слова не вижу, так что натяжке не натяжка, но рядом. работаем.
Начальник и Сочельник? слюнтяй и симулянт? сочок (сочкует от работы, спит вдалеке от работы)
Начальник и Сочок (совочек! боже, якой гарний изик)
Норма и Соромно (нормально и позорно (нормально в русском типа хорошо))
Невод ловит, Севот? сеет? Сито?
Невод и Сито (похожи, да лишь как N и S)
Невод неволит, Сито освобождает. Но сито и задерживает кого-то.. посевное сито представляй.

Если Невод вод, то должно быть Не и других стихий видимо? Хотя бы одной. Колосник решётка в печи, но слова огонь в ней не вижу. коление от слова коло~солнце
колосс соллнце?
солнце колосс?
калит, Кали, жарит, жалит, салит? гарит! г~к~с, л~r (russian л, спустя рукава; and english r, right)
If лr were the depiction of left hand and right hand, the sonors between them should be the organs between them. Lungs? that's the л which I recognize as left arm. So No H for Heart here, No C or even G, Л is also for лёгкие.
Колосник от coal (уголь) которое слово kohlekessel мне подсказало, kohl+есник(стандартная последовательность суффиксов, как в словах лесник.. kohle is coal (уголь) in german.
Небо имеет бо которое в слове воздух во?
(но по смыслу ни сетка ни решётка (сетка была уже: сито))
Holzkohle (древесный уголь) призадумало:
> Are there cognates to german word Holz in english?
Indeed there are! The English word "hilt" is a cognate of the German word "Holz". Both words share a common Proto-Germanic root, "huliz", which means "wood". In English, "hilt" refers to the handle of a sword or knife, often made of wood. So, you can see the connection between the German word for wood and the English word for a wooden handle. 🌳🗡️
>


This journal is so chaotic! Here's google's ai's overview of the next subject:
The ancient Chinese constellations are characterized by three enclosures, four symbols, and twenty-eight mansions:

    Four Symbols
    These are four regions of the sky, each associated with an animal:

    Azure Dragon: Located in the east, this symbol is associated with the horn, neck, root, room, heart, tail, and winnowing basket

Black Tortoise: Located in the north, this symbol is associated with the dipper, ox, girl, emptiness, rooftop, encampment, and wall
White Tiger: Located in the west, this symbol is associated with the legs, bond, stomach, hairy head, net, turtle beak, and three stars
Vermilion Bird: Located in the south, this symbol is associated with the well, ghosts, willow, star, extended net, wings, and chariot

Three Enclosures
These are three areas around the North celestial pole: the Purple Forbidden enclosure, the Supreme Palace enclosure, and the Heavenly Market enclosure
Twenty-Eight Mansions
These are seven mansions in each of the four symbols, for a total of 28 mansions. The mansions are named after things like horns, dippers, legs, wells, and more. The Moon passes through about one mansion each day, which helps track its progress.

The ancient Chinese astronomers systematically named the visible stars, assigning each star to an asterism and then numbering the stars within that asterism. The numbering was based on the star's position in the asterism, not its apparent magnitude.

and I keep on looking into it:

The 28 Chinese constellations, Xiu (宿; xiù), are quite different from Western constellations. For example, the Big Bear (Ursa Major) is known as Dou (斗; dǒu); the belt of Orion is known as Shen (参; 參; shēn), or the "Happiness, Fortune, Longevity" trio of demigods. The seven northern constellations are referred to as Xuan Wu (玄武; xuánwǔ). Xuan Wu is also known as the spirit of the northern sky or the spirit of water in Taoist belief.


It's supposed to be the sky of chinese constellations, but what is it? do they have a different sky?
Here, have the
modern star chart showing the traditional Chinese asterisms, with the 28 mansions indicated on the border of each hemisphere.

China is in the northern hemisphere, hardly did they have the southern sky back then.

And this one has 24 zones instead of 28, so whom should I believe?
The first, blue-and-white image has 28 of the radial lines, this one has 20 of them.. wut
that blue and white image had 96 zones at the external circle.

It is whole new thing to me. i wanted to have it for some time. I guess I had it in less sophisticated diagrams, well, little by little, I may need this thing when I get to chinese or something else in the region. So, yeah.


Tang is such a chinese-looking word, yet Pi tells it's norwegian:
The word "tang" comes from an Old Norse word, "töng", which means "tongue" or "point". It's believed that the word was adopted into English sometime during the Viking Age, between the 8th and 11th centuries.
This makes sense when you consider that the tang of a sword or knife is a long, thin part of the blade that extends into the handle, much like a tongue extends from the mouth. So, it's a pretty fitting name! 🗡️👅

Is this tang the explanation why tongue has such a weird spelling? To distinguish the two!
В русском танг называется хвостовиком. Не знали термина, придумали свой.
tail and tongue ar sorta similar. Do they share the same t, I wonder?



Yesterday I asked muses or fairies to tell me what they want me to think about, and they were shy.

Today I understood, that феи звучит гораздо прикольней, чем музы (музы грубовато, как музык, словно только для музыки они и пригодны(. Феи слово известное и в русском, а в греческом так обозначает Богиню. Богинь? Богини


A thought I immediately thought was the will to take over satanism.
I was experiencing Satan in me in that дебош thing, so I think I qualify.
And I did it after I read Magic: History Theory Practice
And I have a vision in how they're all wrong: Satan doesn't like assholes, that's why he revolted.
But what if they're satanists not of Lucifer, but of Jewish God? And they are! They surely are, only that explains the infestation of all fields with the rat nation. Can we exterminate all rats? Should we?

Well, to figure that out a debate with a competent jew would do, but they shy from debates, making us think that they do so because they know that in result of such debate they would be to be put to death.
(as talmud explicitly says: "if they knew, they'd kill us" (but now they worked to demoralize us, tioi make oure morals relativistic, so that inevitable revelation of all their sins doesn't cause genocide))
Well, here's a quote to this context: "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive." Harold Wallace Rosenthal.
So, what does it tell? Does he ignorantly calls jewish god Lucifer, or does he do it knowingly, so what he tells there is that most jews do not follow the jewish god, but are of different belief?
This brings us to 1978, two years after the Istanbul airport attack and the date when the supposed “Rosenthal Interview” first appeared. Today, that interview can be found all over the Internet, in audio form on YouTube and as memes on Neo-Nazi social media. In 1976, a month before his murder, Rosenthal supposedly sat down for a recorded interview with Walter White Jr. in which he spilled the beans regarding the Jewish conspiracy to take over the world.“Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer – so I wasn’t lying – and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive,” Rosenthal is quoted as having ostensibly told White. Another choice quote: “I was taught that we Jews must become lawyers so we could control and strangle the courts, and even the judges, unless they were Jews. We should become doctors and teachers and leaders in all the churches – and this goal has almost been fully accomplished.”“It would appear that Mr. Rosenthal might have ‘talked too freely,’” White wrote in the introduction. “Meanwhile, I, Walter White, who conducted this confidential interview, can now state after much investigation, expense and travel, that Harold Rosenthal was undoubtedly murdered at the Istanbul Airport, in what was to appear as a hijacking, probably by his own people.”
https://m.jpost.com/diaspora/forgotten-terrorist-attack-spurs-judeophobic-hoax-587222


competent ~ confident


войлок ~ валенок



In A.D. 864 a monk wrote "there exists a people under the sky in regions where no Christians can be found, whose name is Gog and Magog, and who are Huns; among them is one called Gazari [Khazari?], who are circumcised and observe Judaism in its entirety."

The Göktürks, Türks, Celestial Turks or Blue Turks (Old Turkic: 𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰜:𐰉𐰆𐰑𐰣, romanized: Türük Bodun; Chinese: 突厥; pinyin: Tūjué; Wade–Giles: T'u-chüeh) were a Turkic people in medieval Inner Asia. The Göktürks, under the leadership of Bumin Qaghan (d. 552) and his sons, succeeded the Rouran Khaganate as the main power in the region and established the First Turkic Khaganate, one of several nomadic dynasties that would shape the future geolocation, culture, and dominant beliefs of Turkic peoples.


позорить ~ поссорить


1 I иди
2 г go
С c see (I wrote them from bottom up, so less than 3 is c
3 зри

иди и смотри такие простые глаголы.. go was see as g was c

go ~ дуй (сходи~посмотри)
дуй ~ do

Letters are much less set than words, so many more words would be homonyms, and on some deep level they're the same words.

do, go, see ..are they the same thing originally?
hearse~horse

news~noose

salad~solid

comedie

slab~глыба

начальство~начхательство

Master is both the Lord and the creator of other things, thus some masters are deified.

deified is a palindrome word.
deus sued?

to sue ~ судить
to beat ~ бить


штандарт ~ стандарт (соотношения сторон и цветов стандартизовано одним королевским величеством, иностранно по отношению к другим)



A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N
O  P   Q  R  S   T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z  &
!    !    !   1  2   3   4   5   6   7   8    9
1 D and R also meet in k-symmetry, remind eachother in various script
2 initial e in romance languages are s in germanic languages: etudent~student, E~Σ
3 f and t are the same form rotated 180 degrees
4 here I lost it
5 gh reflect uv though.
6 ij I combined like this, because w is also double, and because I&J were the same letter.
7 k~x: k~ks
8 ll as y, and I met l~y before, not sure if it's lie or not
9  Z~N,  N~and

the most problematic pair (the most different ones) are GU, HV, IJW, LY, MZ
and looking at that most of them pairs are good, I look for resolution, and surely most of it disappears once M is after I:

and I want to pull it to W (which didn't even exist then) and sorta fail:



Why else would John the Terrible call his city third rome if he didn't consider his ancestry from some romans, if somebody of his parents didn't come from Rome? So, they naturally did, monarchs intermarry,

marry~merry (русскому уху оба похожи на мэри, но всё же в marry это э ближе к а чем в merry)



Thinking of how spitting can be transliterated differently, spit, плевать, тьфу, сплёвывать~sp-t

p in spit is plevatь? spit~сплёвывать, s is prefix which means off, pit probably was filled with water, because in russian пить is to drink. as if пить~воды́, as if those two words are some дремучие когнаты.

п ~ в (both are labials, p and b (that tells that left and right is more important in the context of labial/lingual (ср. d and q (both lingual (And what does it mean? p is clockwise, b is counter-clockwise, as if counter-clockwise is more basic form. Compare with d being clockwise, and q being counter-clockwise, as if d is dobro, and thus goes clockwise, while b is bad, and goes counter-clockwise. But p is dead b, as note would be, but ploho is also bad, pizdato on other hand, but pizdets is bad again (maybe because it's peace's death) so is d dobro and q qуёво?)))))


The in old english: masculine: sē, feminine: sēo, neuter: þæt
A in old english didn't exist (which reminds me of probability of b being the first letter in the past)
old english: þæt mægden (german: das Mädchen) and both words are neuter (why? not a woman yet?)
old english for woman: wifmann is masculine (because man is maschuline, and she's wife-man)
old english for woman: frowe is feminine
source



In hebrew אמש is three mothers and אמת is truth, and אמנ is true, so אמ is the main part of the word, and in the context of three mothers, two mothers would they be if people knew letters before they knew fire. Before fire everything was more simple: water and earth (вода и земля, два мира этой планеты)
Waters would be our mother into this life and earth would be responsible to send us into another one. Into the world of trees and such? Pretty much.

two mothers are two matters! две материи! твёрдая и жидкая

эрец ~ отец (закрытые слоги)
маим ~ мама (стало очевидно, когда открытыми все слоги сделал (mommy))

эрец язы́ко
мами губно (разве не читал я, что иногда чтение букв было обратно (вместо им читали ми) но сейчас даже не помню ни то что где, но и о каком языке. о египетском, быть может.

р[R] слова эрец как T в слове отец можно объяснить тем, что qrst are one claster.


 i
e
a
o
u
    are chromatic sequence, and I is for 1 and V is for 5, as in roman numerals they are.
A O U for fire, air, water was just about it. Where was it? In notebook it probably was,
a for fire, u for water, two opposites in the same spot give us ✡, and O is probably the circle around it.

A 3 (three sticks (as if for a bonfire))
O 4 (four sticks)
V 5 (a palm holding a cup, thus symbolizing water)

but such representation would make both fire and water odd, which is rather odd.



The task of finding universal semantics is complicated by homonymous antonymity between nations, so we have to look at languages separately. And even in the same language different layers are to be expected. Either way, the task is possible to solve, which examples of Kessler and Lemelman show (whether their takes were accurate or not, they're encouraging)


be and do are in russian the same way, so let's consider them the corner stones.
p and q could be пей и кушай. ку is a weird syllable, in russian it can be found in кушай, кусай, кури, кути, кулёк, кулак, кувалда, ку
кусок (кусай~кушай)
закуток (где кутят?)


Working on my rubik cube, I this time marked each cube only once, and I did it so that A and Z are alone at their opposite subcubes, while others are around the other eith sides (ah, yes, forgot to mention, that cube is truncated, so that it reminds cilinder. having each subcube have not more than two surfaces) so I went round, but J didn't jump to the B-row, but more naturally was placed next to I, and the same happened with R, and in result I had FOX at one line. And knowing this word from english gematria, standing for 666, now I wonder how could that happen, since the principle is different, and the period is different,

A
B C D  E  F  G H I
K L M N  O  P Q J
T U V W X Y R S
Z                            thus not only FOX, but many other of such triads are the same.
A B C D  E  F  G H I
 J  K L M N  O  P Q R
S  T U V W X Y Z & (The ampersand can be traced back to the 1st century AD and the old Roman cursive, in which the letters E and T occasionally were written together to form a ligature)

Well, now it's clear, that 8 with one step back gives the same period as 9.. but why?

BKT is a great sequence.

demon is deman, расчеловечился.


Let's return to what's important.

B is to be
D is to do
G is to go ?

B G D
Go is the middle ground between Be and Do (you're neither active nor passive in that action)



MN ~ WZ

  IJ  KLMN
UV XYWZ  such a stretch..
Υ Φ ΧΨΩ    ..that's better

so, MN~WZ matter only in the context of that rubik cilinder, where one line is central, and thus always is, which others is marginal, and is always on the margin... Why do I even care about it? It's raw because it's new. I dont' know if it's going to grow into anything, but I shouldn't discriminate the thought. But then maybe I should. Hygiene of thought is the necessity.


What am I doing here, you might ask. I'm wåndering.


Ответственность (описался как ответвенности, что стало очевидным значение ответ винности)



Be Go Do Eat
Fight  ?  Hide     I'd


Sight ~ Side

Ride ~ Right? Rite? Подобно тому как write слева направо, так и едут по правой стороне?

tight tide?
light lead? this pair is alright
fight fit (fat as the opposite of fit? food fat fit (fat is closer to food)
feed fat food

hight hide (I think I saw this pair before)

might made?

night need (to sleep, sleep in is needed in the god's scheme of things)

fight feed! hunt is fight.

white weed? wide weed? типа раскинулось поле широко (тогда как дерево высоко)

tight tide? tight tead? teady is tight. tidy is tight.


См. ~ see  (see = с-и(смотри))  and isn't it how м and и meet?! (also in k-symmetry,

и = me (both as I and semantically in the context of who is coming. And would be end, and what is it about and and end? are they even cognates?)

Когнаты и однокоренные одно слово - это английский подогнал интересное.
Слияние двух солнц.
слово ~ солнце (и я не ожидал этого сходства, и и I тоже не подозревал, когда писал предыдущий абзац на основе сходства ми и пи (п ~ n, what a mystery))


\
ст ~ щ: чистее ~ чище (thus сте ~ щ)
(from the graphical standpoint, те ~ ч (or ц! and then e~c!!!))

e's = s  (yes~si, is, but why doesn't it invert the meaning?)


here, a testimony about two big sixs:

it rings the bell of fish in ☯ being called sixs somewhere.
Which is interesting, because chinese 6 looks differently: 六
So did they borrow ☯ from some nation which marked six as 6?

But then to my surprise 六六大顺 doesn't return ☯ in imagesearch, so am I trippin here?

Was it some marginal theory I read somewhere ..and I couldn't even find where I'd say that in the previous volumes, so what is this hallucination? Not only ai can hallucinate information, it seems.



Pussy Riot rhymes to Россия, я как R

riot ~ right

bill of rights is bill of riots? Prescribing where to rebel, when to rule, how to overrule.
(it's a fantasy though (most probably, though right could be cognate of riot if we think how we had it in the pre-historic period. riot fioir what is right))

for is alphabetic sequence, the is not. of is not. so there's no tendency among words to follow alphabetic order, thus alphabet appeared much later than words, but that is nothing which we wouldn't know.


Here, I decided to bother Haidux some more:

А чем буквица 7×7 людей взяла?
Если углубляет русскую историю, то моя тема её углубляет тоже, не противопоставляя, дополняя.
У россиян с европой общий путь, тропа своя.

Let's see what he'll tell.


Hell ~ he'll? kill? in the context of Valhalla it is Hill, and in the context of christians it's Hall (underground) hall is hole thus, hole in the earth.



Japanese p (゜) is much better pi than π

And ⵔ, tifinagh R, which is Р in Russian, both R and Р have that ring..
but so does b, B has two! d, g o q too. not too many, tbh. a? a b g d o p q R and that's it?
a b g d
o p q R  -- pretty much the counterpair of the previous line! voiceless R? хриплое Р[er]

Колдовской колпак был шлемом!

o p q R is  OP QR

a б g д

And how do these two legends OP QR and a б g д work together? OP being repeated in QR (and russian R looking like P also tells that those are cognate symbols) tells that a б is the initial two.
Or was it бg? бог? or баба yaga. gд is what follows and stands for god. goд the thoth? Θώθ

It is Ibis, which Thoth is thought to be. Or was it his name? Was he with a big nose? Was he a Jew maybe? The three mothers of Sefer Yetzirah is a very deep layer of knowledge.

There's another bird looking very similar: in russian it is called Аист (очень алфавитное название)
вот аист:

This bird is mentioned in the legend of the alphabet:
Hermes reduced these sounds to characters, showing wedge shapes because cranes fly in wedge formation

Тем временем:
Известны настенные изображения ибисов, встречались даже мумифицированные ибисы в могилах. Тем не менее, современное название вида священный ибис (Threskiornis aethiopicus) может быть ложным, так как нет сведений, что египтяне почитали именно его. Вероятнее, что почитаемой птицей был лесной ибис (Geronticus eremita), обитавший в древности в Египте и вытесненный священным ибисом значительно позже.



A cool banter for traditionals: are your toilets also traditional?
Because I don't know any example where traditional is better than modern.
(toilets are just an obvious example)
With divorces? Why wouldn't you want to get a divorce if you're treated badly?
But the counter is fair. There are probably both better and worse factors in marriage (or any other given topic) so our task is always seek for better, not necessarily new.
(here I changed my own mind by arguing with myself)


Why & Because as two opposite b's. It came to me as a revelation during the writing of the previous chapter, so let's explore this revelation. Let's collect such pairs of words and see if they lay some pattern.

As.. As..

Who? You! h and y

Theys seem to tell some story alright.
But then isn't Who? You! a random di-sentence? di? not bi? No

Is it? Yes.
Is it? No.

Yes? No.

All these are not pairs in the sense of Why? Because..

Who?
We.

Who?
Me.

Who?
He.

Who?
She.

Who?
They.

These are like Who?You. And if this one was h/y, those are u/и, h/m,

h~n? (why? because he~он. I guess such construction is often omited in this book, so if you didn't get it, try to apply it between neighbouring sentences of a chapter)

Wo? is it Who in some language? Or is it from some joke of a woman who didn't know the language well? I don't know such joke, so probably the former (the previous one. me speaking better made it worse for me)


All those are what? Nothing special. Who You is funny though. Dialogue supposes You.
I suspect it to be a nothingburger I try to protect as its father would.

None of them are as close together as Why and Because.

Cause is case.

B

G    (did I take liberty in placing G between B and D? No, that's how it goes in greek and russian)

D


P

Q   (did I take liberty in taking Q instead of K? There's no K in italian and irish,
T


Now this is an interesting way to put it.


F G H

V X Z   these are not half as awesome


Can I? You can.
Now this is a normal grammatic inversion. So does it tell that I'm onto something, since I meet characters I know from normal education? Suddenly you love rform al education. It was lo/ve
love is law've (по закону имеешь (право и что? и всё))

и что? и всё.  это ближе пара к уай бикос.



гноить гневить
rot        red

verrotten
verfaulen
verwesen
modern. that's to rot. Rot is ​der Moder. What is going on here? Can I happen to introduce some buggy output of g.t into my book? But no, wiktionary agrees:
modern (weak, third-person singular present modert, past tense moderte, past participle gemodert, auxiliary haben)   to rot, to molder





abe бог god deus (not just de, dev) ev (not just eve, devъ)
Deva Vega? VZHѲ (vowel Η and labial Θ? I as 𐌆? but they also had 𐌉 before 𐌊. But then how do I know they had it in that order and was not just arranged that way by scolars?)

I lost that seqence ad E-V,  not even being certain if it's Eve
                              at (what a type typi typo! I didn't even notice it! Howe moany of such are there!?)
What were the chances to get modern after I was speaking of tradition bad?




faith is fairies: феи's, фей's.
at face value is at faith ("value" is not necessary here. Was it because somebody made a typo and couldn't rewrite velum? Didn't people erase it back and forth?)

back and forth are a pair like Why? Because.

through and through is like as.. as..
(it seems another silly idea got its way, okay, let's see if it's silly or not)

divine in german: göttlich, himmlisch, muten (gold-like god-like


What is god for brits? Gold.
What is бог for russians? Благ? Thus God is Good. What other word is close to Бог? Помог?
Г-дь
Б-гъ

^Г_゜gы
годы? годъ? г-дь б-гъ ~
could it be the eastern order? g d b g as musical gamut? g д б g как чётки! счётки, счёт как алфавит!

господи помоги? гсд пмг as not triad, but pentatonic record? gsдpmg 

modern rot
muten divine, a couple of german words, what were the chances that they came together!
so similar, so different.

Suddenly:
> is the word "modern" borrowed from german?
Great question! The word "modern" actually comes from the Latin word "modernus," which means "just now" or "of today." However, the English word "modern" was influenced by the French word "moderne" and the German word "modern," both of which also come from the Latin word "modernus." So, while "modern" is not directly borrowed from German, it was influenced by both French and German. 🧐
> German word "modern" is borrowed from Latin?
Yes, that's correct! The German word "modern" is indeed borrowed from the Latin word "modernus." Latin has had a significant influence on many European languages, including German. In fact, a large number of German words have Latin roots, including "modern."
> How come it means "rot"?
Oh, you might be thinking of the German word "Moder," which is pronounced similarly to "modern" but has a different meaning and origin. "Moder" comes from the Old High German word "mōdar," which means "mother." In German, "Moder" can mean "mold," "must," or "decay," which is why it can also be used to refer to "rot" in certain contexts. It's just a coincidence that "Moder" sounds similar to "modern"!
> Isn't "modern" translation of "to rot" into german?
No, that's not quite correct. The German translation of "to rot" is actually "verrotten" or "faulen," not "modern." The word "modern" in German means the same thing as it does in English—that is, related to current times or contemporary styles. The similarity in sound between "modern" and "Moder" is just a coincidence. 😊
> Google translates it so. And wiktionary agrees: modern (weak, third-person singular present modert, past tense moderte, past participle gemodert, auxiliary haben)
to rot, to molder
Oh, I see where the confusion might be coming from! The verb form of "modern" in German, which is "modernen," can indeed be translated as "to rot" or "to molder." However, this is a different word from the adjective "modern," which means "contemporary" or "up-to-date." So, the German verb "modernen" is related to the noun "Moder," which means "mold" or "decay," but it's not related to the adjective "modern." German can be tricky like that, with words that sound similar but have different meanings!
> How come moder for mother became a word for mold?
That's a fascinating evolution! The Old High German word "mōdar" originally meant "mother" and was related to the Latin word "mater," which also means "mother." Over time, the meaning of "mōdar" shifted to refer to "earth" or "soil," likely because of the association between the earth and fertility. From there, the meaning further evolved to refer to the mold or decay that can occur in soil, which is how we ended up with the German word "Moder" meaning "mold" or "decay." It's an interesting example of how the meanings of words can change over time! 🌱
> Can you give an example of german sentence where modern means to rot or to molder?
Sure! Here's an example of a German sentence where "modern" is used as a verb meaning "to rot" or "to molder": "Die Obst in der Küche modernen, weil sie zu lange auf dem Tisch lagen." This translates to "The fruits in the kitchen rotted because they were left on the table for too long." In this case, the verb "modernen" is used to describe the process of the fruit rotting.

> and in a grammatic const(..ruction where it's modern and not modernen, I wanted to say)
Absolutely! Here's the conjugation of "modernen" (to rot, molder) in German:

    ich modere (I rot)
    du moderst (you rot)
    er/sie/es modern (he/she/it rots)
    wir modernen (we rot)
    ihr modernet (you [plural] rot)
    sie modernen (they rot)

And here are some more example sentences using different forms of the verb:

    Der Käse ist gemodert, weil ich ihn vergessen habe. (The cheese has rotted because I forgot it.)
    Wenn die Kartoffeln modernde, sind sie nicht mehr gut. (When the potatoes are moldering, they are no longer good.)


> You know so much! Maybe you also know which ancient abecedaries are genuine and which merely arranged so by scholars? For example, is 𐌀𐌁𐌂𐌃𐌄𐌅𐌆𐌇𐌈𐌉𐌊𐌋𐌌𐌍𐌎𐌏𐌐𐌑𐌒𐌓𐌔𐌕𐌖𐌗𐌘𐌙𐌚𐌛𐌜𐌝𐌞  genuine, historic, or merely academic order?
Wow, that's a very specific question! 😄 The Gothic alphabet you provided is indeed a genuine historical alphabet that was used to write the Gothic language, which is an extinct East Germanic language spoken by the Goths. The Gothic alphabet was derived from the Greek alphabet, with some letters being added to represent sounds that didn't exist in Greek. The order of the letters in the Gothic alphabet that you provided is indeed the traditional order, as used in historical Gothic manuscripts and inscriptions. So yes, it's both genuine and historic! 📜
> What manuscripts? Were original gothic artefacts such manuscripts?
The primary sources of Gothic writing are a few surviving manuscripts, the most notable of which is the Codex Argenteus, also known as the Silver Bible. It's a 6th-century manuscript containing a Gothic translation of the Bible, and it's one of the most significant sources of Gothic text. Other Gothic manuscripts include the Codex Ambrosianus and the Codex Carolinus. These manuscripts were written on parchment, which is made from animal skin, and were likely created by Gothic scribes and scholars. In addition to manuscripts, there are also a few surviving inscriptions in Gothic, such as the one on the Ring of Pietroassa, which is a silver ring found in Romania that contains a Gothic inscription. So while there aren't many surviving Gothic artifacts, the ones we have provide valuable insight into the language and culture of the Goths. 📖
> Were abecedaries found in those artefacts?
To my knowledge, no Gothic abecedaries have been found in surviving Gothic artifacts, such as the manuscripts and inscriptions I mentioned earlier. However, scholars have been able to reconstruct the Gothic alphabet and its order based on the surviving Gothic texts and comparative analysis with other related alphabets, such as the Greek and Latin alphabets. So while we don't have direct evidence of Gothic abecedaries, we can still piece together the alphabet and its order through careful study of the available texts and historical context. 🤔
> Goths were beginning with runes. Couldn't they have their alphabet in futhark order instead?
That's an interesting point! While it's true that the Goths were likely familiar with the Elder Futhark runes, which were used by other Germanic peoples in the region, there's no evidence to suggest that they used the Futhark order for their own alphabet. The Gothic alphabet was specifically designed to write the Gothic language, which had its own unique sounds and spelling conventions, and was derived from the Greek alphabet, not the Elder Futhark runes. It's possible that the Goths were influenced by the Greek alphabet due to their close proximity to the Byzantine Empire, which used Greek as its official language. So while it's an intriguing idea, there's no evidence to support the idea that the Gothic alphabet was arranged in Futhark order. 🧐

Gut so, ja?
Indeed, it is a very impressive technology, the next big step after search engines.




I offer it to Tom Hyte to collaborate on the book with his ai partners.
He was polite to read first two pages with ai. It will take him few sessions more.

It's Hite, not Hyte. Not Hate? Not Hide? Why are their names so weird? Tom? Paul? John Sam. Russian names are more syllables: Дима, Димон, Дмитрий. Семён, Сеня. Павел, Паша. Иван, Ваня.

Семён is just Sam with some suffix. Is Sam abbreviated Semen? Сеня? Is closed syllable alway abbreviated open syllable? m ~ ня? мимими?? уменьшительно-ласкательный суффикс
Том is Foma in russian. That's Θ~Ѳ thing

м ~ ma (the initial syllable, desu ka? not in the name.

ma
me
my

[маме ми, мами май]

мами (мамы, mommy, две гласных: непалатализующая и палатализующая (с учётом того, что раньше была ))


Что я здесь делаю? Угадываю. Ищу свамые базовые понятия и сопоставляю их с базовыми лингвистическими понятиями (первые упомянутые понятия (да и вторые) могут быть не только лингвистическими. ЧТо здесь я делаю?* Анализирую (от слова анал) свой собственнный текст

Баба Бабе Бабы Бабой Бабу
Мама Маме Мамы Мамой Маму
Папа Папе Папы Папой Папу

-ой не особо канает. И, вспоминая, что в иврите лишь четрые строки,

Баба Бабе Бабу Бабы если по русски, но зачем по русски, и это ы в украинском! Слава Укораине.
Мама Маме Мами Маму
и~i, у~u, and ࿊-like a and e are agreed upon from reikyavik to vladivostok
o is also agreed upon (evne in greek) and Y as greek U reminds russian U, the У

Мама (даёт) a~t as a~д?
Маме (даём) E~M? and Ϻ~Σ the third of the mothers? of the maters. Of my terra.

а как ах(ah) of hungry face
e is a smile, with which we share. fed face. can share.

Но мама~маме же всего лишь русское локальное
давай сравним с английским..
Mom~mom's. Not impressed. Nothing in common.
mama~mama's is closer, only now E~S, which I mentioned in E~M~Σ(Ϻ) _(how can S be like both M and E? Σ[es] Ϻ[ms? sm? makes no sense, and who said that es is not se? those.. are they yes and si or is it from completely different story? completely different language]


E M Ш could be the three. Э as fourth?
EM ШЭ (that's in russian alphabetic order, but is it the order, who knows, let's look for more)
EЗ МШ (есть маша (конопля?) могло письмо в среде курителей конопли и поедателей грибов произойти? символ Сешат говорит об этом: 𓋇(звезда традиционно зелёная, над ними не рога, а шляпка гриба (ствол он делит с коноплёй, а следующий иероглиф ещё что-то выше имеет, на заячьи уши похожее, но наверное тоже какой-то наркотик, даже не знаю хороший или нет)


EM ШЗ (если Ш~wS, and З~Z
that typo made me thinking:
WNES (West, North, East, South)
WMEЗ (in North is Мороз

EЗWM EastSouthWestNorth
ЭΣWM EastSouthWestMorht (мы, но нас(nos in latin and nose in japanese "me"))
ЭЗΩП made me think of North~Мороз as at Полюс. Оз в мороз это us of polus? колхоз~охлос?

Как видишь, это черновик, и как в любом черновике, здесь много лирики и прочей ..поэзии.


εϛμξςω
Here they speak Stigma (ϛ) is a ligature of the Greek letters sigma (Σ) and tau (Τ), which was used in writing Greek between the Middle Ages and the 19th century. It is also used as a numeral symbol for the number 6.


ε and ω could be two timypes of vowels: palatalizing front row and unpalatalizing back row vowels.
з and m could be two types of consonants: lingual and labial. Notice, that ω and m are both labialized.
ε and з are both lingual. They're as if ..I saw them ..in Philippines: ᝀ(a (ᝁ(i))) and ᝂ(u)

Yet I saw i as vertical wave and u as horizontal wave in some other writing system of Philippines:

But then when I was desperate of how much of it I should digest, I came onto something awesome:

All four writing systems from Philippines which got to unicode in the sequence:
ᜀᜁᜂᜃᜄᜅᜆᜇᜈᜉᜊᜋᜌᜍᜎᜏᜐᜑᜒᜓ᜔᜕᜖᜗᜘᜙᜚᜛᜜᜝᜞ᜟᜠᜡᜢᜣᜤᜥᜦᜧᜨᜩᜪᜫᜬᜭᜮᜯᜰᜱᜲᜳ᜴ ᜵᜶᜷᜸᜹᜺᜻᜼᜽᜾᜿ᝀᝁᝂᝃᝄᝅᝆᝇᝈᝉᝊᝋᝌᝍᝎᝏᝐᝑᝒᝓ᝔᝕᝖᝗᝘᝙᝚᝛᝜᝝᝞᝟ᝠᝡᝢᝣᝤᝥᝦᝧᝨᝩᝪᝫᝬ᝭ᝮᝯᝰ᝱ᝲᝳ᝴᝵᝶᝷᝸
᝹᝺᝻᝼᝽᝾᝿

The tagbanwa is deffinitely missing a couple of letters, so let's work with buhid, because it's 18: