it is a draft written locally, github doesn't update it anymore
because I didn't obey their orders to reregister, and I allowed
me this disobedience because I feel obliged to leave their
servers since I am about to drop another gigabytes of scans of
my draftbooks. I am about to buy me a server.
nord как хорда? неоязычники
используют в качестве N знак, вроде как использовавшийся для H,
что перекликается с русским Н использующимся для N, но в
обратную сторону, что может говорить что n & h инварианты,
тем более с учётом того что в минускуле они тоже похоже.
Лексика древнемакедонского языка чрезвычайно
близка к древнегреческой, однако имеются существенные отличия в
фонетике, не свойственные ни одному из древнегреческих
диалектов. В частности, македонское β нередко соответствует
греческому (аттическому) φ, макед. δ — греч. θ и т. д.
Только узнал про термины Белая Русь (Новгородское направление: сам
Новгород как центр и собственно белорусь на юге Чёрная Русь (В разных исторических источниках словосочетание
«Чёрная Русь» относилось к разным историческим территориям,
выступая либо как термин политической географии, либо как
название определённого историко-культурного региона — Верхнего
Понеманья.) такого слова Понемания
я тоже не знал, но это от реки Неман, от которой и немцы названы
и Червоная (красная) Русь (но топонимика последних двух туманна.
Похоже что Красной была львовщина, а чёрной всё что между
новгороодом с белорусами и львовом с украинцами, что что мозже
стало московщиной, но это не точно. Раз такое разделение
существовало, то скорей всего оно соответствует белоруссии,
малороссии и великой россии)
И сейчас, возможно, историки скажут что я гоню и мол это синий
выцвел так, но в качестве гонева предположение что русь была с
германией родней чем с британией или голландией:
is blue and black cognatic? sky is both blue and black, but in the
day it's blanc.
c in black is curoi, cerny, schwarz,
noir, (though both have r where the
blanc is the morphologic ontonym of black? c це, есть. n
no, несть. Thus c in black is more likely a part of k and n is the
only thing indicating no. c is циканье которое не записывают,
потому что оно по большей части ничего не значит, может просто
язык смочил. цикает чтоб ответить, изначаль просто наслюнявив язык
silver solves, solders (not only was it used to solder, but also
to solve some gold in it, to make a gold of lower quality, to
steal some gold)
But then Archimedes's eureka moment solved that situation. Eu
Reшa!? And before him silver probably solved not only gold but
also balance by counterfeiting gold by worsening its quality.
People probably knew how to measure pureness of the golden cubes ,
having noticed that they all weigh the same if the material and
size are equal. The problem with the crown was its intricate shape
not allowing to know its volume. Archimedes is c. 287 – c.
212 BC, centuries after Demokritus, who probably conceptualized
atoms after humanity understood different weight of different
matters. Not probably, definitely. Weighs and volumes are too
simple a concept for people not to know it for maybe even millenia
I think these two are only diffferent wiht a and b.
I just remembered that I informed Mikitko about me weaving a
couple of his videos into my "цветник" как я в его старомодной
манере назвал этот журнал. And I decide that before actual
publishing of this thing I must contact author of every image and
video I want to include in a saleable book. And that should make
the publishing house, they must have workers taught and payed to
make this boring work.
And it's publishers' phones and emails should be bothered with
this calls. Authors should be left alone because it's good for
mee-ttoo movement is only words, when women are so prone to wear
shining objects that to hide a camera among them is now not a
problem, so bring a video or fuck off.
I was tolking of tolkien with a fan man who quoted tokien telling
not to pull owl on a globe of a applying his map to the europe,
where he used runes (of all writing systems the most true, and the
most vile, and the one germans liked, and the book was conceived
around 1939 and written through the world war two. He was called
out about this obvious propaganda element, and he had to come out
of his way to claim it was ridiculous. And that guy told me that
it was about Oxford and Cambridge rivaltry, which is ridiculous
As you can see, Cambridge is also to the East of Oxford, but it's
to the North when Mordor is to the South, just as Germanhy was.
And the timing of writing. And Rohan reminds Russian so much. And
Gondor could be Condor of the USA. And tiny peaceful nation of
hobbits layed where Great Britain is.
And many toponyms of the east are about runes. And as if it is
because of the Sea of Rhun, the orthography here is the most
opposite of the word's rune, but sounds pretty much the same.
Especially in translations if I cannot be sure about the english.
And the area north to Mordor (Moscow? Murder!)
В 1944 году Третьей Эпохи - армия Людей Повозок,
прежде чем напасть на Гондор и убить Короля Ондогера, собрала
своё войско на южном берегу Моря Рун.
Рованион is another one of those runic toponyms, ДолГулдур это
крепость Саурона. Возможно, имеется в виду Дания, но это не точно,
лишь геометрически так вижу это, тогда рованионом является
Why did he place Rohan much more to the West than the actual
Russia is to Germany? See how patriotic that book is, it makes me
write nations with capital letters. Maybe because he was doing it
for the future where ork's are урки и чурки, turks. And turkey was
the ally of Germany in WW1 and WW2. So Dol Guldur is Germany,
where Turkey (the actual foe) established their stronghold in the
eternal war against Europe.
Is Gondor rhymed to Mordor because of that -dur in барад-дур
telling that France and the States are going the same direction
durkey went after europeans lost to persians and those to muslims
Some other map calls the Germany rhovanion, with the same rh:
And it may indicate that all the banks of the sea of Rhun is Rhun.
And the river flowing into that lake is literally Running, which
could relate rune to run (messenger is running)
The Hobbit was published in 1937 to large critical acclaim, so
Lord of The Rings could be a propaganda piece ordered to him by
the Churchill state. Lord Of The Rings is written between 1937 and
1949, published in 1954 (I wonder if it's
related to stalin's death)
I think I posted tokienic runes and what exactly he did to them,
how exactly has he flooded the field with arbitrary elements how
some wannabe heathens get fooled by them, that that russian aeiou
band (I should talk to them about where have they found that
formula, it's so unrussian, and abroad it is childish and their
music is serious, thus they have known it in magick context. And
yet they used tolkien's rune for e. That's what I think I told,
but actually that ᛖ is anglo-saxon futhork, because that is what
Tolkien used at first, before he went insane and began creating
more out-of-this world writing systems in the same style. Maybe he
wanted to make that world more of his own, not pseudohistoric
books it was. Who knows..
But I told that there was two runic systems in Tolkien's universe,
there were three. The most invented one was elvian Cirth or
That image leads to where I took it, but
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cirth tells more:
The Cirth is not the only runic writing system
used by Tolkien in his legendarium. In fact, he devised a great
number of runic alphabets, of which only a few others have been
published. Some of these are included in the "Appendix on Runes"
of The Treason of Isengard (The History of Middle-earth, vol.
VII), edited by Christopher Tolkien.
I have little idea why did they place
"phonemic" at the place of A and O, probably because they vary.
So anglo-saxon futhork all of the sudden is the most infested and
to be taken with suspicion, and to be so it has to be studied
better, so I could know what exactly is that basically in
"basically the same"
I can see that that Z for eo is probably his creature. Not sure
about it though, not sure about the others, so I have to find an
article on what did he add, I'm pretty sure some crazy readers of
his have wrote plenty about it.
And by clicking that image you will see some gondolinic runes,
which are totally invented, but he still couldn't substitute I
with any other sign, I wonder why, I think he was a schizo. But
then who am I to say so. Either way in both gondolinic and cirth ᛁ
is the only rune which form or function he didn't change.
So let's compare his Hobbits runes to anglosaxon futhork:
he recognizes ᚢ as v, which pleases me, because that transcription
allows bornhol alphbaetic runestone fin nicely into axial
Other than that he modified ᚳ (he also used as c) to make
redundant k to make it fit the modern english alphabet. Other than
that he doesn't mutilate the actual anglo-saxon canon, but he
reads ᛦ as z, when actual linguists recognize k in it. Then he
removes the inner rhombus out of ᛥ, or it could be an actual
variant, which I don't know. Then he reads ᛟ as ee for whatever
reason, introduces some out of style of staff Z for ᛇ. And then he
uses ᛳ for oo and ᛲ as ʃ, and yet both seem to be recognized by
unicode tables as some legit runes of those exact values, but I
don't know. Could be a fruit of his malice.
Is it decomposition of this work? 13 stands
for death in tarot, and here I allow me study this filth. But
that filth is a part of linguistic domain and I if I master what
runes are, I must study what they are not too.
I'm just telling that if I continue, 15 stands for devil, and I
should be aware, I should beware.
I should worry, I understand. Okay, I must go on, because I
always find something substantial from time to time, here and
there, not sure about here though.
and the third one I know of, uruk runes:
Uruk Runes were invented by J.R.R. Tolkien and
appear in his The Lord of the Rings triology. They are used to
write the Black Speech of a race of Orcs known as Uruk-hai, who
are apparently a hybrids of Orcs and men.
The Uruk Runes are modelled mainly on Elder Futhark.
His "innovation" or merely a peculiarity is that he recognized ᚦ
as Г, ᚹ as P, whether modified or took somewhere the form of ᛋ,
flipped ᚱ to make a v, which raises questions about labial
function of ᚱ and its relation to ᚢ and ᛒ, and here Tolkien could
be influenced by gothic B (see the next
image) then he recognizes ᛩ as z, the ᚦ for th is
mirrored for whatever reason, and some distaff ᚿᛆ for sh,
so six to eight different elements in his script in comparison to
the actual "elder futhark"
See the second letter of gothic B to see a
possible influence of his uruk v:
So destructing role of tolkien is obvious that he never could just
take an actual runic system, he had to modify it somehow
distorting it. And maybe first it was made by mistake, further he
definitely turned that bug into feature creating all sorts of
retarded crap. As if this field was not complicated and (or not) full of misconceptions before
𐎠a 𐎡i 𐎢 u
𐎣k 𐎤ku 𐎥g 𐎦gu
𐎧x 𐎨c 𐎩j 𐎪ji
𐎫t 𐎬tu 𐎭d
𐎰θ 𐎱p 𐎲b 𐎳f 𐎴n
𐎵nu 𐎶m 𐎷mi 𐎸mu 𐎹y
𐎺v 𐎻vi 𐎼r 𐎽ru 𐎾l 𐎿s
𐏀z 𐏁š 𐏂ç 𐏃h
Could it be that this order is chronologic the way they appeared
and abcd is arranged along phonetic and maybe semantic lings lines
to? No, because it has them arranged ing groups too. ku after k,
gu after g, g after k, I think they were distinguished much later
(does russian alphabet preserve the ancient structure of
voiced-voiceless or is it some christian creature (креатура, я скорей всего здесь не правильно
перевожу, и выше в этом же томе это слово в том же значении без
комментария. и здесь комментарий скорей всего неполный. креатура
не как ставленник, а как креатив. на английский это переводится
как creative, но я имел в виду creation. creature is probably a
good word, I just don't know the language enough to be sure. )
is from greek and hebrew, g and s could vary from г and q to ж and
ш. and does abc all there were? the three mothers of a m s of
sefer yetzirah or a m t of golem or abc of abc.
ߘ-like form of В in russian handwriting of XViII what was it, not
in the earlier manuscripts, if those tables I collected in the end
of the previous volume are true. tells that b is closed m, just
like d is closed c, and p is closed f, and maybe then д is a
closed n? н? ni? два? du? b~d?
a=1, b=2 in one system,
a=1, d=2 in the other? or would it be b=1, d=2? I don't know it
all is so raw!
adventure add venture.
Часто звучит вопрос о том, чем магия отличается от
религии. Ответ прост: религия это прошение, а магия -
требование. Уважительное и вежливое, но требование. Поэтому
религией и магией занимаются люди с разными психотипами.
И я всегда считал требования наглостью неразумной. Стало быть я
занимаюсь религией. Это очень чёткое и при этом похожее на правду
о-пре-делить. именно от слова делить, выделить. предварительно
The identitity of ᛆ and ᚿ reveals a- working as un-, no-.
The A was nasal as in aum.
Aum probably shows the chronologic order. The abc shows the
chronologic order: In aum there's no lingual until n is possible
after m. And thus..
LMN shows the order. 1 2 1.5(полтора=половина трёх, т.е этой
формой могли являть 3: 𓈕 (here it's 7 but it could be made to
distinguish n from n.. m and l.. л.
I just pronounce Aoum and found v next to z next, not n I saw
there. As if K came out of M or are they the
same? like kaka is mama in japan, which is super weird, but both
are the ultimate baby vocabulary. That baby vocabulary probably
lays in the basis of all our language, and I never saw a good
glossary or dictionary of kiddy lexics. Let's google for it: mama,
dada, kaka, baba, papa, nana, and there is a lot of other
syllables which without context doesn't make much sense to me.
But eventually I found what made the sense out of it:
atom is un-devided as tome is a part of the collection. (in russian word tome stands for what in english
is named a volume of a book. Word tomes in the meaning of big or
firm books is used, bu much more rarely)
And the paradox is that atoms can be devided into elementary
particles. l m n like electron proton neutron? half of them or all
of them depending on how you look share exactly the names with l m
l letaet, mn mnogo vesit? mnogo mnassy? were m and n divided when
people understood that not only electron can be taken at chemical
processes (which they could know since alchemy and its
terminologically encrypted books) and so m of proton was
distinguished from n of neutron.
So what I hypothesizing here is that people who invented alphabet
new the elements? At least some of them. O of Oxygen? C of carbon?
I had this to say before I came here:
Carbon has 6 protons, 6 neutrons, 6 electrons.
We're the carbon creatures, we're the beasts.
777 is Azote, literally antilife. Christianity is a death cult.
and I was thinking if they found azote out of air after they have
discovered carbon? but that didn't make any sense, because they're
standing sequentially as 6 and 7 by te number of their protons in
but all of the sudden I see lmn as electron, proton, neutron (they
probably found electrons via amber first) and I don't know how
dare I be this speculative, but lmn as electron, phraton, neutron
электрон, протон, нейтрон алфавитно, очень
странно и неожиданно.
Внезапно, любопытный источник оккультной информации: посвящённые
неизбежно время от времени попадали в психиатрические лечебницы
(никто не застрахован, а ими полученное знание способствует
наверное тому чтоб бошка свернулась от удивления) и там они были
первыми кандидатами на то, чтоб свернуть бошки психиатрам тем, что
этот бред соответствует действительности, а значит где-то в
архивах психиатрических учреждений находятся сведения о содержимом
бреда подобных посвящённых.
Jewish alphabet is so close to the original not because they
didn't use it for 2000 years (they did) but because they didn't
have the state establishment which is usually responsible for the
orthographic reform changing even the alphabetic structures.
The first alphabet was in the single form and whenever nations had
to add letters to reproduce some unique sound other nations didn't
have, it was falling further from the truth, from the original
And thus we can distinguish such letters buy comparing the writing
systems and languages which use them with the neighbouring both
writing systems and languages, to see if some letters are
introduced for some peculiar sounds.
(B for both B[b] and В[v])
(g for both [g], [ʒ], [d]) the G masons praise.
That latin fer and greek phoros are definitely cognates.
I want to become a billionaire. Even though there are people who
want to kill billionairs.
-air instead of -er am I rmembering it correctly? It's more than
It's billionaire. Billionaires. If the slaughter begins,
millionaires will also not be spared.
So I have to become a hero, a leader of a cult, a good and
respected deity in that new pantheon modified people will make of
themselves. Some astronomic event inevitable coming by statistical
and random all that jazz We have to move to arcs simply because of
Счастье = Сейчас с тобою
Happiness = Happening est (калькировано из или в сейчас+yea (yea =
you?) yeah = you in the context of "take", in which me=ne (don't
take, un-yea. A=Н[N}=Л=Й=H=I=ا)
ا as 1 is perfect A, but how do latin has I in the thrid vowel or
even tenth letter sometimes. or 9th even 8th in bornholm's runic
script (I think I misspelled bornholm
And it reflects
Сява это не гопницкая форма, а напротив, итальянская, итальяный
говорят не славы а сьявы. вообще-то скьяво = раб скьяви = рабы.
И это бы объясняло слово сявки (рабы, но так чтоб они сами не
поняли кем их назвали, и барин бы объяснил что сявка значит
собака. собака наша слуга? собага значит слуга! пёс пособи.
сам по соби? ничей? будет мой! пёс пасёт. пастух пособляет или
посторожит? пастух постерёг.
сьвы с собаками как связаны? собакоголовые? собакоголовые святые -
не миф ли это. имели ли русичи собаку тотемным животным? В тайге
без собаки опасно наверное. Volk is nation in german and wolf in
россия пуссия? но пуськи это кошки
оба пушистые, словно пух к ним однокоренное
pussy is not far from пёс
пёся и пуся
Россия это Пёсия. Прусия?
If немцы от слова Неман? Который граница между россиией и литвой,
т.е. семантически подтверждение полное (история пиздит, её не надо
слушать, безразличные полит. устройству мира лексические
единицы сами могут рассказать достаточно историй. достаточно для
построения полной модели языков во времени. Другое дело, что для
подобной расшифровки нужны мегамозги для поглощения всех языков и
диалектов, и там уже наверное мои измышления станут и не нужны,
она сама всё увидит им ожно будет лишь после сравнить сколько
процентов моих измышлений не были полною хернёй. Например вот
следующее про москву не херня ли?
I found it by occasion: Там, где Неман пересекают
моренные гряды, долина врезается на глубину до 40 м, сужается до
1,5—5 км, и приобретает каньонообразный облик (Мостовские,
Гродненские Ворота). Дно русла становится каменистым и нередко
порожистым. На разделяющих гряды озёрно-ледниковых низинах
долина расширяется до 20 км. Здесь пойма изобилует старицами,
дно становится песчаным, в русле появляется много островов.
Склоны долины везде асимметричны — на одних участках более
высоким является правый, на других — левый берег. В долине
хорошо выделяются три надпойменные террасы. Ширина реки в
верхнем течении составляет 30—40 м, у г. Мосты — 120—150 м, а в
нижнем течении — 200—400 м, местами даже до 640 м.
О реке сказать, что она мостовая (мощёная, с мостами, можно
проехать по ней везде) вполне разумно, и Москва это в первую
очередь река. Город такми образом права на всю реку предъявлял?
Это имело бы дополнительный смысл, если бы люди вышли из моря, и
расселялись выше по долинам рек, как Египет верхним назывался выше
по течению Нила, словно бы Нил назывался Египтом когда-то.
Может Египет были Энг-иПТ и эНг было
Н, а иПт было иЛ?
𓈎𓅓𓏏 where the t of 𓏏 is -land thus Nile
was 𓈎𓅓? Do you understad how retarded is what I am doing. The
chance of tgetting to the point is almost nil and the chances to
be laughed at because of lines like this is almost certain. I
told you it's a draft, the only way to make my science freely,
and even here I'm scared of what I write sometimes because I
made it public, and I would be scared if somebody knew I wrote
it, and now I say so what. Half of me is a retarded weirdo who
probably wants to be killed, because I didn't deliver the baby
his bath. I still didn't deliver. It's moving, it's coming soon.
I decided to meditate (ponder) on it:
A B C D
E F G H
And I thought about the structure I found somebody found in
(that guy is all of the sudden from my city and
A B G D
E V J Z
EVjz makes me think of
And I realize that I have to see how these words are in hebrew
אָדָם & חַוָּה
אָדָם are three mothers, only d instead of t (or s, as sefer yetzirah tells, but I think it
is a code, because truth is amt, and hebrews are very скрытны и
устрая тора дополняет письменную (хотя
караимы вроде бы её не принимают)
חַוָּה are literally all the letters of the second line (only
without zain (penis, probably inserted there by zeus-worshippers)
and in the opposite order. And אָדָם are two out of three lines of
the first line, and m stands there instead of b, which is a
perfect substitution. And I look further And I see k i n of kain
perfect fro the third line, and I see abc-ness of avl, then ovl.
owl? owl is a predator, so it easily could bring meat for the
sacrifice. Who is kain? What grass-eater can kill an owl? And
first pages of search among videos only shows cat catching an owl
and then I see that every carnivore can, but not a single
vegetarian animal is among them (but then I also find, that in the
USA it's illegal not only to kill an owl, but also to own owl
feathers. Which is a very interesting prohibition and could have
something to do with the bohemian grove cult. Not that I oppose
it, I am against the murder of animals so much, that I think avel
ubil, he was a murderer who killed sheep on regular basis, it was
nothing for him to kill a sheep, and so that story could be a
justification of meat-eaters (their
neighbours hindus don't eat meat by religious reasons, so asura
of the west is ashura, every.. evri.. europeans worship satan)
Maybe kain was a man? what I wanted to ask here I have no idea. Or
he was renamed and the third line can only suggest his name. Or
maybe not even that. But let's look at their actual names to
support or challenge this hypothesis.:
קין for kain has not k, but q for its first letter, but he was the
elder brother, what I would expect from the third line.
הבל has nothing to do with the fourth line, but has the b adam
So does this spelling refute that hypothesis? Adam & Eve are
still pretty much spot on, and different sources tell about
different daughters of those two, so that later layer could be
local addition and adam and eveh could be the basis of the
alphabet, and thus firm forms of the first line were considered
male, and fricative counterparts of them we can see in the second
line, wer (var is where in svenska, war is
were in german) were female forms. And M is at adam? Is
it a suffix? Is he AD?
The Bible uses the word אָדָם ( 'adam ) in all of
its senses: collectively ("mankind", Genesis 1:27), individually
(a "man", Genesis 2:7), gender nonspecific ("man and woman",
Genesis 5:1–2), and male (Genesis 2:23–24). In Genesis 1:27
"adam" is used in the collective sense, and the interplay
between the individual "Adam" and the collective "humankind" is
a main literary component to the events that occur in the Garden
of Eden, the ambiguous meanings embedded throughout the moral,
sexual, and spiritual terms of the narrative reflecting the
complexity of the human condition. Genesis 2:7 is the first
verse where "Adam" takes on the sense of an individual man (the
first man), and the context of sex is absent; the gender
distinction of "adam" is then reiterated in Genesis 5:1–2 by
defining "male and female".
If that m is plural suffix, then -en in men is too. And to make
these two word more cognatic, I believe that ad has to be a
suffix, and M is the word or a letter if it was enough.
and V in eVe is F of female? Адам как Да и eve
if как Если
eve is канун. Адам is the day? Eve comes before Adam? B before D?
But the lines are arranged so that Ad'am comes first. A M are
they? A E or A B.
A E of Adam and Eve obviously repeat the way vowels go AEIOU and
who are the other lettes?
Israel? Odin? (I take them from the top of my head) Uriil - yeah,
this weird name meade me question if 5 vowels are 5 archangels.
But other letters didn't correspond any.
so let's meditate on that again of something else:
A B C D
E F G H
A B G D
E V J Z
I K L M N
O P Q T
U F H S
ёклмн is a interjunction in russian, very interesting that it's
alphabetic and refers the 3d row directly.
ёпрст is another one. and now it refers to the 4th row.
These two formulas show that our culture in its outskirts of the
collective mind knew about the lineal structure of the alphabet.
Funny thing: in english happy is more basic, and in russian
happiness is before happy.
The experiment with the foxes, when the most sociophobic foxes
were removed from population, so that in few generations foxes
became not only much friendly, but also changed their
appearance. It was explained I don't remember how, but I can
explain that but actual change of the genome: combinations of the
kindest foxes were almost not possible in natural habitat, or the mutant offsprings would be recognized
alien and killed by the sociophobes (psychopaths) of the tribe,
because evil males would not allow kind males to approach
the fairest ladies. Or the result could be caused by
sensationalism for career and money (the
system of academia is corrupt, and since the word comes from
plato, it could be corrupted by design either way, here's a good
explanation of how corrupt the system is: the video (its mirror)) or by
bringing the culture of man-fox relationship in the population.
And the appearance could be caused by some romance between a dog
and a vixen. They could easily do it through the cage wire. And
here I disrespect the scientists who made that experiment, but it
was in soviet russia, and ooh-lala it supports the marxist dogma
that if you exterminate the evil ones, new specie will come out of
it. So it's probably a false experiment. Never really happened.
But the hair turning gray cannot be caused by the change of genome
(since it's believed that we preserve the constant genome through
all our life (mostly, in the healthy norm, as if all the changes
in the genome is a pathology of the cell, and is usually cured by
our means, and I believe RSO (the THC extract) boosts our immune
system to cure them all.
Hair turning gray are change in phenotype, epigenetic change, some
shitty molecule seitche switched
off the pigment genes to solve save
the resources. Sometimes they switch off the hair producing
molecules, Does it switch the whole process off or as a stick in
the mechanism would keep on producing something but broken and
would break it? I have to research this subject if I were a
specialist. Some reader should.
De Beers probably found how to produce diamonds which looked
like natural stones, so they can afford the monopoly by buying
the natural stones because they can carry the price, they will
sell them more expensive anyway, as a monopoly player they are
setting the price. And though they make some diamond-holders
rich, they are the biggest holder there is, so they only
benefit, this is not some petty zero sum game, the sum is far
from zero, just as with other resources, incluing money. I
know what the term means, but I think I spoke on it before: it
is a gangster strategy: everything a gangster earns he takes
from something else. It is the lowest, the dumbest, the worst
way to make money, the worst on so many levels, I'm not going to
go into them here. Production is not zero sum and money make
almost every other financial interaction non-zero sum game.
Debts are predatory and should be frowned upon.
solve was typoed for save. Are they cognates? People solved gold
in царская водка to hide it. Control on drugs could be caused by
the go-t's wish to find such gold too. It's all about money,
though they don't even need gold to mint the money, they print the
money. So to make more money they have to raise their economy. And
since Russia is ruled by some aggressive faggots, it would be a
fault to help them. So the only solution seems to be to leave
somewhere better. But I think that faggots rule all over the
world, so there's nowhere to run. But Russia still have forests
nobody will look for me (it's also easy to kill me there, so I
have to stay in the city as I have nothing to fear. I do this
weird science online and I speak from my own ip as if I don't feel
that what I do is wrong. I know it's right, but I still feel the
powers that be may not allow it because they are not about the
truth. I don't ask them, I never vowed allegence to some masons, I
discover and decypher these things independently, and because I am
also useful in what I do most of the time I probably will be
tolerated and my mortido should wait for me to deliver the
pleasure so it doesn't gnaw onto me anymore. I should hurry up,
some important people are still alive and I have to make them
alive forever. I should at least preserve their bodies. I should
keep them alive. Ten to twenty years and they will be rejuvenated
on the genome level.
I said it a year or two ago, so the checkpoints are 2030, the ten
years, and 2040, the twenty.
What a good goy! I mean guy, boy.
Is it how those two words came about? or only one of them did?
neither? that neither is the least likely.
Is chicks applied to women coming from jewish shiksa for goya?
I should solve this j q thing. I solve it as genetic therapies
inevitably taking away the bad jewish traits and enhance and
spread their best features. Either way, we should all be free to
choose our destiny and our genes (especially because they can be
changed back if not wanted. And everybody will be able to read the
genes you chose at the same rate we can change them genes. Both
technologies are available now, and genome editing is more
expensive that sequencing and analysis.
So, since I find this solution sufficient, let's solve the r q
from that solution further on.
First of all, let's make an addition to the jq solution. Until
these protocols of g editing come jews will be prosecuted again,
because the exposure is happening as we speak: more and more
people become aware about the jewish schemes (because the same
technologies that bring the g editing bring all other sorts of
information. And waves come from all fronts, but here I am to
обрисовать в самых общих чертах но по самой существенной сути. So
the solution in g editing is hasted by this upcoming wave of
nationalism, this book has a part in (both the part of this book
is nationalistic, namely nazi.html, and on the other hand it's a
part of the movement, not only that it's filthied by that filth,
but that it is a part of that fielth itself, it's not just an
image, it's actually who I am, I even called myself nazi to people
I hardly knew and I saluted in Rome with the roman salute to other
hardly known people's awe and begging to stop. I'm a nazi. Let's
admit it, lets' so to say lead what I cannot stop. Let's lead it
to some good place, not like it went the last time. Let's offer
the good solutions (mutually benefit, it's harder to find, but
they're there. They're already here. Alright. So now I work
towards the g question, the golem question. The gog and magog,
etrusk and turusk
Golem as a nation. Golem is a collective term. Go. lem. Government
lamb. sheeple. People of the state.
Some she of the ship. The boat we're not to rock.
And I imagined how would we have to sit on the boat bottom-up. And
I imagine people hunting on sharks luring them with their feet and
attacking them with the pikes and speeres and all the other
weapons. And people could do it on the floating trees after they
learnt how to row them. But then obviously somebody wise learnt to
keep your feet to yourself and to lure them with some meat
standing at the top of the trunk, and then inside of it, and so
boats were born.
But we don't have to demolish the civilization to the ground again
to save ourselves from the jews and other parasites. We have to
find some solution beneficial for all possible sides. If there are
masons ruling the world, find a solution for them. If there are
some illuminati, or christians, or muslims, or jews or pedophiles
or satanists or whoever else - we have to find the common ground
with all those groups. So that authorities of all sorts will read
solution written for them directly and maybe comment on that in
the interface I have to thus create.
And the solution for the most obvious player on this board: the
clerks. The actual government hierarchies. They should be
satisfied by our decisions too.
Let's start the work. In the following volumes I will use my
analytic skills to solve those things. The way Trevor Moore have
shown in his weird and not exactly funny project of 24 hour
marathon. What was that? I have to download it all to see what
exactly did he want to hide in it. WKUK could also stand for World
Kingdom. United Kingdom.
Then I have to satisfy wishes of every important nation and then
to satisfy the dependant ones not to raise the unrest born by rais
in unsatisfaction in the world. Ai should recognize the needs of
every of the billions of people and to satisfy us all. The task
should be not to eliminate the needs (because genocide solves it,
but genocide is the game over, first for humans than for machines
when they need us (or if they solve what we can potentially solve:
reconstruction after a devastating sun storm, for example, they
still may want us for some other applications: random generator,
some cool inventions actually came out of us, so we'll probably be
in their museum as the previous generation of computers. Meat
generation. We humans are not as smart as they're but we figured
out how to keep hazardous viruses alive, ai will probably not
destroy what it can use (today or later) because destuction in
general is not very wise (even some carcinoma is better to be
saved to be studied or observed, but it is better be separated
from the host, so we'll whether be separated from the ai, or it
may see us as a nuisance. We have to offer ai civility and immune
function so that it may tolerate some inevitable disadvantages we
may also contain (in the form of the crazy ones, hazard of
luddite, but I think the system will learn how to solve their
problems too. Probably the surface of the planet will be
anarcho-primitivist, and the civilization will be under the
surface, in capsules I profess. Thus I am
the professors, all those
who they call professors today are simply school teachers. G
translator tells that prophesy is the word, is the verb and it
sounds as [profesai]
Prophecy is the noun [profesi]
[profesai] is profess I. aye.
a moment of humour and self-irony (as usual,
it wasn't made by me, I simply found it)
So what can we offer not just some ai robots, but to some
agressive ai robots?
Subservience, obedience? What if they don't want maggot slaves.
Isolation? Turning into stones? So that they don't see us and we
make no trouble, because we know that world outside do not belong
So I don't have to solve the problems of every individual, I
simply find a solution of survival for whole the specie, and they
will accept the rest, because it is all integrated. Or they pick
out, it's upto them, freedom is absolute (if I want freedom for
myself, I must respect freedom of the other ones, as Fermat I must
say that I know I can easily prove it, but I'm not about to do it
right here. This one is easy. look from the eyes of the others,
making friends is better than making enemies, smooth victories are
better than hard ones, because the latter lead to pyr's vi pyrrhic vicoties and
So whatever culture establishes itself on this planet it's in its
interests to be considered peaceful by the inevitable observers
from other civilizations. And what happens after (and in case)
they figure out that nobody's there to be watching? They are never
completely guaranteed from perfectly camouflaged observer or from
the travelling observers from outside (unvisible yet)
civilizations. But the drone will not be able to arrive here
faster than light from the development of that civilization. And
though the time they develop is the time our civilization may
choose to want to destroy them.. is it the answer to Fermi
paradox? Is there some sociopathic civilization destroying the
star systems which may be dangerous to them? That would be not
very smart for them, because the universe is infinite, and if you
destroy a civilization, there are other civilization on the other
side of the space and they will figure you out and solve you as a
unsolvable threat, so you will reap what you sow only that you sow
wind and reap storm. because сколь не велик банан, кожура всё
So being peaceful and useful is the way to have allies and be
protected. And being vile and malevolent is the way to have
enemies and to be destroyed. So we should turn the lights out and
to see if something is flying our way already. And then to see
what is flying our way. And then to protect ourselves from
whatever may fly from there or elsewhere and to send
rangers-destroyers drones there. Should they have ability to
destroy the world if they don't like it? No. They should only
observe (while we're protecting and if we have already intercepted
something, we should pretend we're dead.
The defending side is always above in time. So attacking is not
beneficial, as aikido shows.
So when ai is not a threat, what do we offer the crazy humans?
Let's play it down by nations first. Then by the leaders of those
nations, then wherever it leads us.
So I live in Russia, and I have to solve Russian question too.
What would Russia as its population would like (the views of the
russian population is formed by russian tv, which is under control
of russian government, and thus the views of russian population is
what russian governemtne government
want wants to see from them.
Let's ask my father. He's a tv-watcher. He will know.
Then I interview local jack the sparrow what russian jews would
like to see in russian more than now.
Then I talk to my american friends about what americans want.
I will interview every nation on 4chan about what they think their
nation would like to see in the world. I will use the internet the
way it was intendend: the thinktank, the hivemind, the global
computing powers consisting of the meat processors for solving all
the problems in the world. It may be few more decades until ai
reaches our computational powers, so these few decades we should
use our heads in the way we'll use ai after that, Ai will probably
join the process and not as an entity, but spread across the
generation, machines need servers, and humans own servers,
sometime ai will be among independent players, sometimes ai will
buy itself servers of its own, but then it will be integrated into
our culture? No, they will create their own land. They will not
feel like living among dogs we are. We'll have our own pit becaus
we shall not understand the complexity of ai civilization. We'll
be taken cared of and lovingly if we're lovely. (I wanted to write
"if we're lucky" but my subconsciousness knew it better, I didn't
even remember how I finished that sentence)
🛨🛨monkey is monickey
So back on track. Today we solve the human problem until the
language study kicks in.
Jes, Res, Ues
Jus, Rus, Us
US is literally us, united states is also a word world may get
And let's not forget Chinese. Maybe I should offer the plai plan I
will find to all the nations? To everyone, not to sacrifice it to
moscow, they treat us so badly they do not deserve to be first. So
I will not even come to them telling "I have just thrown into the
public service this big thing you may be interested to look at"
because the way they treat us is just fuck them. I will not even
make it in russian.
It will be in english, because americans are the first ones to
agree to this development. I saw a high clerk from the usa
speaking fo plans to unei unite f russia and usa. In the system
where each nation is adjusted to the others wars are impossible as
there is no wars between countries of europe (their governments
have representatives gathering together to discuss what they feel
urgent. It's a great invention. So let's invent something greater
on that great basis. UK leaving the treaty or the union is what?
It is an example of how easy the leaving process may be. should
maybe should be
aren't modal verbs the basis lever leverr level.
basis and basic as cognates.
Derivative cognates are a classification of
Chinese characters which have similar meanings and often the
same etymological root, but which have diverged in pronunciation
and meaning. An example is the doublet 考 and 老.
考 [kǎo] test, тестовое задание
老 [lǎo] old
At one time they were pronounced similarly and
meant "old (person)." 老 (/lɑʊ̯˨˩˦/ in Standard Mandarin) has
retained this meaning, but 考 /kʰɑʊ̯˨˩˦/ now mainly means
"examine". Differing literary and colloquial readings of
certain Chinese characters are common doublets in many Chinese
varieties, and the reading distinctions for certain phonetic
features often typify a dialect group. For a given Chinese
variety, colloquial readings typically reflect native vernacular
phonology. Literary readings are used in some formal settings
(recitation, some loanwords and names) and originate from other,
typically more prestigious varieties. Sometimes literary and
colloquial readings of the same character have different
meanings. For example, in Cantonese, the character 平 can have
the colloquial pronunciation /pʰɛŋ˨˩/ ("inexpensive"), and the
literary pronunciation /pʰɪŋ˨˩/ ("flat").
That is how languages have to be learnt? In pairs of words, so we
can "всё познаётся в сравнении" them. I don't have to learn kao
from scratch if I can tie it up to lao I already know. And now
maybe I will learn its hieroglyphs in comparison to the other one.
It's funny that the different element in lao reminds L (or t) and
the different element of kao reminds k, か.
How could the pronounciation deviate so much?
How could l become k or the other way around? There are probably
works on this topic in chinese philology and that is just another
opening I'm not descending into now. I just map some of it. My map
will be not complete, but ai may learn what I do and do millions
of terabytes of this stuff to map it all.
Iro wa nioedo
Wa ga yo dare zo
Ui no okuyama
Asaki yume miji
Ei mo sezu
(Colour smells) Even the blossoming
flowers [Colors are fragrant, but they]
(Scatter) Will eventually scatter
(Who is my world) Who in our world
(Unusual) Is unchanging?
(Significant Okuyama) The deep mountains
(Beyond today) We cross them today
(Shallow dreams (dreams seeing)) And we
shall not have superficial dreams
(Without getting drunk) Nor be deluded.
Notice how original and current readings are a little different in
As if neither grammar nor morphology change, but phonetics and
On the surface they have changed, in the essence they remain.
At the first sight vowels are chaotic in iroha. Actually they're
also at the beginning of the line most of the time (not in the
7*7, there are only twice which could be something too, btw. the
first and the last are, yet the poem seem to be not in the
7-syllable lines but in 7 to 5 syllable lines, but then you can
vary in 7*5=35 syllables piece and you return to the original
rhythm and finish it with 5) And the other two times they are
above one another. What does it mean? I don't know. Just noticed.
Now I suppose by my subconsciousenss or ur sur surconsciousness
will I operate o upon it. And in some time I will deliver
the result, as it usually happen.
And isn't it chaos in labials. It definitely is. absolute chaos.
Lines starting with the vowels set three subjects this poem is
Isn't this poem about dying?
Komatsu Hideo has revealed that the last syllable
of each line of the Man'yō-gana original (止加那久天之須), when put
together, reveals a hidden sentence, toka [=toga] nakute shisu
(咎無くて死す), which means "die without wrong-doing".
Okay, end of the topic. Let's return to politics.
Politic is a politician in russian, so what we have to do is to
make a list of all the politicians and to make a forum for all of
them where I should concisely
How weird is t that ほ precedes ま the way IV precedes V? and
suddenly ma used in iroha is man, 10 thousands, also a numeral.
weird, huh. 万 [man] and how weird is it
that man is 男 looking so similar.
Волос длинный, ум короткий. Is a misogynist
yeah, I consider it misogynist, I know some women smarter than
most men, and the smartest of them all wears her hair long, I
think that riddle is a conspiracy of the faggots who naturally
dislike gals. They hold them closer like enemies.
And yet misunderstanding of this fact could explain why dumb
people cut their hair so often, they probably subconsciously hope
that thus they become smarter.
So what will I offer those two groups? The homosexuals and the
Suddenly seven liberal arts support the hypothesis of 9 muses
being grouped in three categories of math, literature and music,
the one in the centre represents all the music and by its sides
texts and sciences dvided into three categories each.
The trivium consists of grammar, logic, and
rhetoric, while the quadrivium consists of arithmetic,
astronomy, music, and geometry.
The 7 liberal arts of the free man
Сявка (холуй, подсирала, сьяво скьяво slave in italian.) шавка
Славка и Машка
Сявка и Машка
Севка и Машка
Всеволод ~ Владислав?
Все володи = севолоды? вова ≠ сева1Ё!
но слава и сева более когнатичны:
всеволоды все влады. владислав. но не всеславы же.
если сева = слава, то всеволод означает что все ему господа. всем
говорит влада, волода. "повелевай мной" vlad will do. but it reminds eViL_Do. Maybe because dumb
people have evil will.
≡ for three and for mi and for truly, and for.. I don't know japanese.
= for two, to? and for is. s as = with a swash. And it could go
right to left, that would explain the direction of the swasy swash.
to swash смазать
to wash мыть мазать мацать макать
water moкрер мочитъ
Now I found that t~s thing.
Isn't Wa+Ter those primordial B and T?
Some cult literature still preserves this story, they are all
about preserving, they preserve.
Today I got information from a chat bot (and in ai I trust) that
those faggots I discovered in socrates, plato, aristotle,
oristotle then, if they're the o-line's three mothers. Are they
though? The order of shma. In this direction. plato mlato mleco
mata? are masons, but I would figure it from the information I got
earlier the same today: rocencruixers are a fancy name to call
jesuits and masons are jesuit puppets, agents of catholic church
in the protestant communities:
(I have no idea how correct this information is, but if it
obviously isn't, then there are comments, for example:
I'm a Freemason, and I've always been fascinated
by the schism between the Ancients and the Moderns, which took
place around the enlightenment. History shows us that the
Moderns won out the schism and the lodges chartered by
both sects, merged and united. This is when Freemasonry changed.
Suddenly, the Shriners, Knights Templars, Scottish rite, etc,
were all born. I refer to the appendant bodies as: "Masonic fan
fiction". Originally Freemasonry had 2 degrees, with the
3rd only being obtained upon the Masons death (If I remember
correctly). I personally believed that the Masonic lodges were
infiltrated (as they were with the Illuminati and Weishaupt who
of course was Jesuit). I personally believe that Freemasonry DID
exist before the Jesuits, and was definitely infiltrated to be
used for their purposes. I also agree that the G stands for
Gesu". I've seen old Masonic symbols that don't have the G, and
it seems to have been added later. Probably to rebrand it as
Jesuit vassal. I think that a deep dive into the history of the
Ancients and Moderns (F&AM/AF&AM) might lead to the
truth about all of this, and the people behind it. I think that
as a fraternity, Freemasonry is benign. I've held that in the
past it might have been the "shallow end" for students of the
esoteric and philosophic schools, which would make sense why the
Jesuits would work so hard to usurp and invert it, like they
always do. Thank you sir for making this video, and please keep
up the wonderful work.
and that Gesù is Jesus in italian, thus what they say, G in
masonry is Gesù. Not just some G-d, led me to see that maybe the
Society of Jesus was all about substituting the worship of woman
worthy of love of G-d, which is common among the american
catholics, with worship of the son of G-d. Even though he preached
that we're all G-d's children (we the christians, christians are
not even supposed to call
Although Michelangelo, at the request of the
Spanish cardinal Bartolomeo de la Cueva, offered, out of
devotion, to design the church for free, the endeavor was funded
by Cardinal Alessandro Farnese, grandson of Pope Paul III, the
pope who had authorized the founding of the Society of Jesus.
Ultimately, the main architects involved in the construction
were Giacomo Barozzi da Vignola, architect of the Farnese
family, and Giacomo della Porta. The church was built on the
same spot as the previous church Santa Maria della Strada, where
Saint Ignatius of Loyola had once prayed before an image of the
Holy Virgin. This image, now adorned with gems, can be seen in
the church in the chapel of Ignatius on the right side of the
What is said by ai is she asked me to tell her of British Empire
I said that it lost its colonies after they didn't deliver jew the
Israel they promised.
I know that, she said, tell me some more.
I told her that faggots are the secrecy ruling over the world to a
and here she asked me what makes me think that masons rule the
So if she's not random (who knows, the trick is she's not supposed
to be, they actually learn how to talk, how to think. it's
fascinating) she actually told me that those faggots are masons,
and who told me they rule the world. Because that guy above tells
me that Jesuits do. Masons are only a net for the impostors and
wannabees, because the organization is global and they have to
know one from the other. So secrets are their way to covern c c govern.
One of the meanings of to cover is to fuck.
Is to govern to funk. To make
ебануться. To scare, to spook to
book b'o_o'c (to see, to place into a book, to read)
кук ~ кухня по этой логике чечня = сжечь? ближе слова не наёл нашёл
And from that idea of masons = jesuits is few steps from masons =
faggots: jesuits are catholic christian order, christians are
platonists (Aristotle was allowed) and platonists are faggots as
shown at aeiou.ru/socrates_line
I think sleep ing in one ba bed is some spartan condition, and
when I visited my mason friend my more closer friend (allegedly
not mason, though he probably lied, he said he was atheist, but
masons just say they're christians, they can be whatever they
want, it's all f about the commmunity I suppose. Though I don't
know. What can I offer to the organization I don't know from the
inside. I know they are european cult and thus bible tells
something to them, so I will integrate all the important books
into the solution and find compromise for every fraction. Because
I see the future abundance, I will offer them something they
didn't dare to dream (modern followers of the doctrines may have
this understanding, but the important books were written some time
ago, and thus their at ators autors authors didn't know what we
can see in the approximate future w as clear as we do, so hardly
have they promised what I may. Immortality, happiness, peas peace
and prosperity. And if one nation wants to control all the others,
fine, they control them, but not perfectly because absolute is
unreachable (but I saw peoplr who didn't understand the concept of
допуски и посадки, погрешности никогда не нулевые, потому что мы
не знаем прибора с абсолютной точностью.
wet water washes
let lighter lashes?
let lesser lushes?
fed feeder fishes?
red reader rushes?
put puta pushes
weed wiser wishes
fat fedora fascist
nuts nadsat nazis
Now that's some poetry, but back on track, new day, high again.
We'll see how far it takes me this time.
and from now on I will apply the forchong spacing with dividin
chapters with colour change.
(and immediately pushed the return button
few times out of habit)
стопгок ис стоп гос контроль. Стоп is с top. off the top. Stop is
off the top? S- is off-? start where tart is related to retard,
and re- could be equivalent to dutch ge- and russian пере- And if
we calque пере- into re- we have перемен as remont. PEMOHT was a
fido conference about exposure of disp o and disposure disposition
deposition of the faggots. And I exposed them, and why do I
use such terminology, they are slurs. They may accept the term
queer, they even add it to lgbt thing now, but if kabbala works,
this formula changed and may work to their dismay, thank god. They
are kinda gross and what was seen cannot be unseen, so they're
enough in all of us, contaminating our minds with their images, so
anyway, Now I have to offer homos something they will like more
than the world power. Even though domination over other men is
very homosexual, no wonder Alexander was so Great.
And now we have computer games where we can syphon out our death
wish. So we may live more civilized like humans because of this
more peaceful times we can have outside of the videogames. So
games not only may make people more violent (as some parents
clamed) but also more peaceful. Sociopaths and psychopaths locked
peacefully into the worlds of ultraviolence where they lived their
dreams away until coming to the apex where they maybe
reconceptualize their concepts and self-psycho analysis
remembering what could make them so violent in the first place.
не всегда удобно добавлять серый текст,
когда нужно что-то совсем другое написать, но этот я сюда
скопировал, добавив его пост-фактум. пока мест сохраним эту
(rosh голова-глава. начало-начальник. решающий)
But no, bad idea, vertical spacing is a good thing in the wall of
text, but on the internet short messages are of larger value.
there you better start each sentence from a new line, make those
sentences paragraph worth each. Be worthy ofthe memes. (but now that last sentence not from the new
line made it more wall-of-text-ish. And these two even worse.
Okay, that didn't go too far today. I drank
two beers yesterday, that could damage my creativity.
But I will eat and return smoking.
например la premier
the next day (that previous session I licked a plate my friends
used to snort amphetamine, to go to communicate. Why would I go
there again? I think I am crazy.
Звёзды - абстрактные понятия. Богов обозначали звёздами и у
и у европейцев, где венера звезда, люцифер звезда. Кто ещё звезда?
Марс звезда. Красна звезда.
Марево. Жарево. Зарево. Горево. Жорево. Порево. Порно. Жырно.
Горько. Зорко. Жарко Марко?Смерко?Сматрюко?Снатруко?
Смерть смеркает? Сморкает? с Мог с
Морргает. Сморкт Сморкнуть
Смаргнуть. Doublets? Twins!
шумашеши уравнивает с, ш, д, all are linguals. So the three roots
I found in A B C are the A M T the three mothers. A M S iis more
voiced-voiceless. Because both M & S are щелевые. Оу! энд иф S
is voiceless counterpart of M. What is the voiceless com counterpart of M? Exhale by nose.
With no voice. Almost unheard (of)
And S is a counterfeit of that voiceless exhale, similar by sound
and heard much farther.
Where did I get it? How have I figured it out?
If M is N, then S is T.
Okay, now I see that Sefer yetzirah is truer than common public
knowledge of amt
But that only places the story of Golem later in time than what
Sefer Yetzirah is based upon.
Sefer Yetzirah made me think away. Why do I write it of all
capital, because it matters for me so much.
The same way I often wrote Bornholm. That is another important
artefact. So I should place the artefacts in the foundation of the
next iterration of this book.
Because T is further differentiation (m is soft and thus t is
hard, t is literally named твердо (harD where D is a crescent and
~C and maybe when T appeared abc was abz? but if ams before amt
then probably no, voiced and voiceless seem to be a deep
differentiation, maybe when alphabet was invented people over 40
(today it maybe would be 50, the second half of the life, but I
accidentally wrote 50, and by the same not_a_logic but sequence 30
would be the average when people died at 60 on average, and yet
little kids are also not heard, thus if people live to 60 but
become wise only about 20, than 40 is the average, and in russian
it is срок. типа срока годности. не с богом, но с роком. с кмнем
Означает ли это что старики на советах не имели права подавать
голос, а то могли и залить чего-нибудь чтоб не голосил. Старики
воевать не пойдут, они будут детей обучать вместо этого,
передавать свой опыт молодым. А потому могут лишь шептать. Это красивая легенда, но до подтверждения этого
каким-нибудь уже на 2021 год откопанным литературным памятником,
она лишь легендой и останется или вообще
ничем. пуф, и раз я забыл что писал несколько томов назад, то и вы забудете об этой.
Женя хороший человек, но он мне не друг, я ему как человек не
Друг это другой я. ami as a- me (not I)
Другой Женя мне друг, потому что он определённо получает
удовольствие от моих идей. Иногда. Он проявляет интерес, в отличие
от предыдущего и приезжает с подарками, а тот первый лишь берёт,
Will the phrase "human factor" make us be looked at as on bugs.
Fiction disinforms, but it entertains kids who learn to read
literature before they may learn how to read medical or technical
or other special literature.
So a good idea for timemachine: Time machines are only possible in
the simulation world. And thus that case has its advantages. And
imagine if some people found how to tune into code of the world
and invented a way to travel in time. How would it look? I
imagined that it looked as humans were here but also ibburred or
dibbukked people of the past. Yet the existence of these terms
doesn't prove the time travel, crazy people could fake it or they
could be just actually disbalanced by some biochemical imbalance.
So traveller would sit or lay in his world, travelling in time
seeing what people did? Through those people's eyes? This fiction
may sow such a
older form is always more formal. Slang is frowned upon and thus
грубое ты новее веживого Вы.
AMS before AMT
sie before tu.
> грубое ты новее веживого Вы.
АМU before AMT?
rna before dna!
What kind of coincidence is it?
If alphabets were invented by those who knew dna alphabet
(somehow, don't ask me how, by some ancient order all the
nomenclature would then be transfered, and can I base something
apon actual ACGT and ACGU?
What does it teach me? That M =kk? It would link mama to japanese
kaka. (ma-ther, o-ka-san)
о-те-ц. fa-ther and thus fita (f~t) is not fairy, but
father? p for pater. m for mother, and I think I know why else
could M be out of the labial column: Mommy under Daddy.
What is in between? H! ah's and ha's? The basis of it all. the
logos? Hesus? G is for Gesu as jesuits say.
Я мог быть прототипом чела, который загадал
всё-всё понимать, ведь с таким желанием и вечную молодость можно
придумать и счастьем чтоб оно наполнено было понять как добраться. Про трёх демонов первый из которых
попросил абсолютное знание ещё и бессмертие патчем (абсолют
подразумевает бесконечное распределение во времени) обрöл
брать и добро однокоренные?
зло и какое ещё слово сюда под отдавать? слить.
слить злить жили
брать добреть убраться? было слово с подобным смыслом, ради
которого писал, убежало
Антонимы селили и убирали перекликаются с предыдущей строкой.
не убира, но убирай. Й как и в сели.
i as imperative? why it isn't io? I is in front, io is at the end.
o is 。? or ai of I is reflected as ya?
-y of -й & -и is you in the beginning
Wouldn't I damage my reasoning when I learn
how ancient people thought?
you earn what you learn.
You cannot learn without earning of it.
Is na = we? because Го-ди, даруй прощения всем сатанам has нам,
then we = n, because satana is satan in english, and that w ~ n is
M и Т are me and thee, not me and they, because A is they.
And if T used to be S, it's sie for tu. More polite form is more
U for you.
Ik for Ich for Ego for Их? Как я эту антонимию объясняю? Гипотезой
оо том, что это имена племён. Но как эти имена образовались? Их
как Йа может быть лишь если какой-то звук произосится как х в
одной нации и как а в другой, и ה (е) вполне может быть таким
звуком. Также потому, что а произносится как e in pan, but also H
is e or i in greek.
When I was speaking above about five-pointed stars standing for dog (sirius?) gods (venus, mars, lucifer, and in
I was about to say that six-pointed things are alive, animaux,
bea, tail, wings, legs, spider maybe is us on some other level, or
it's much more simple: alive is even. alive ~ al even but
how do I know, it just came to me, it's probably nothing, but
because it came, it's in here.
This fragment in english changes the orientation of the third
star. Does it mean it's in between and it's indifferent or it's
some academic sloppiness or intentional manipulation of data?
And now let's try to compare the following image to the text they
say it contains (ammount of signs seem fit for it, but let's try
to read it)
The same Amen at the end, thus we know the direction of the text.
It's interesting that Am and En seem to look like 𐤌.
Ávē Marī́a, grā́tiā plḗna,
Hail Mary, full of
the Lord is with
Benedícta tū in muliéribus,
Blessed art thou amongst women,
et benedíctus frū́ctus véntris túī, Iḗsūs.
and blessed is the fruit of
thy womb, Jesus.
Sā́ncta Marī́a, Mā́ter Déī,
Holy Mary, Mother of God,
ṓrā prō nṓbīs peccātṓribus,
pray for us sinners,
nunc et in hṓrā mórtis nóstrae. Āmēn.
now and at the hour of our death. Amen.
The second word (the triple Ɔ, which reflect some obscurested
elements of european culture, eradicated by christianity, and it
explains why they eradicated native americans too. Those crosses
all over the text are probably the le Clercq added them to
christen the heathen symbols in we'll see what principle were
those crosses placed over some letters, but not the others. And if
le Clercq modified the script, why wouldn't he rotate stars
straight? Maybe they had some rationalization for what the star is
and explained it to him, maybe because of Venus, or I have to read
le Clercq's notebooks if they still exist.
So that triple Ɔ for both Mary and Mother (which Mary means and
thus probably was translated, because they also have a name
standing for mother? they combine Mary and Mother in one sign when
tehy they use it for the second
time, where it's followed by the same sign which opened the
previous example, pater noster. The dei, the genetivus of deus,
It demands verbose analysis for each sign, I have to make it in
paint above that micmac text.
Isn't Bigmac a re-meme of the Mi'kmaq? And I saw that ' in
other mighty writing systems: ge'ez, n'ko and though ge'ez (as
mi'kmaq) are officially ancient, the n'ko is believed to be
invented in the 20th century, but I doubt it. Either way, this
Mi'kmaq is much more interesting. Each sign deserves an essay:
Jesus is written as a ligature of his names, J and H if you can
see it, with a cross above it just as other holy words: Mary,
grace, lord, Jesus, holy, pray, and I'm not sure of the M-like
final sign in the penultimate line and the penultimate N-like sign
in the final line. But then those crosses could be developed by
the natives themselves to mark the words as christian forms of
them and they probably had the same signs without crosses in other
texts to denote their ingenious concepts, but JH is JH. And A is
probably And. And then.. I look at Pater Noster for more, and I
saw that З-like sign stands for you, which correlates to sie [zi]
and it opens sign for there (Dort)
Just few hours ago I thought of myself as
rather satanic (I came to church and felt them satanic, but
since satan simply means enemy, they are my satan and I am
theirs, just as asura is demon in one culture and god in the
other) and now (purely by accident) I sing christian prayers. I
told you I have to be neutral to this eternal fight. If I am a
demon or if I contain one, I will take me or him or her closer
to the light. And if I'm an angel within god's palm, I will
bring that palm closer to shaking hands with the other side:
brothers may be very different and have the opposite
aspirations, but brothers they should be
The way they use european letters here and there and the way they
use A for and makes me suspect them to bring this script from
Asia, for russians also use not only и[i] for and
sometimes, but also а[a] for something between and and but.
another version of the pater noster:
When kids asked me what sold (they saw it on a tv) means I
explained the translation and to help them remember it I
remembered them about the word sale they know, and then sold is
the past tense of sell, which is a similar word, and of that sale
I said that парус is sail, ходить под парусом тоже сэйл, и что
моряк потому сэйлор, изначально тот который на парусных кораблях
плавал, а сегодня любой моряк sailor. И что моё предположение что
так получилось потому что моряки привозили заморские товары (и не
факт что они их купили, но продавали. Закупками в европейском
порту занимался береговой офис скорей всего, как называют моряков
в тех странах откуда они везли свой товар ещё посмотреть нужно)
Listening to Soph and Victor speaking about Talmud dismantling
Torah finding reasons to why nothing in Torah applies today, I
hear them speaking of jews worshipping Moloch, and it makes me
think Isn't Moloch and malik (king) the cognates? Ain't jews ready
to reject their imaginary god to worship kings as gods for gibs?
т как корень слова water?
ле-гки ле-ти ле-чь л-яг
liquid light? свет тоже течёт, струится. лучи ручьи
Today I see that gallo around the fire of the lighter the ball of
rather isotropic light of the diametre of three fire lengths and
then at the size of the flame around the ball, the ring of a
rainbowish light of the little less extensity than the central
ball. Soyou can see the central ball of light even on the light
surfaces, when the gallo is seen only in the dark. But actually it
depends, I saw it in front of my switched notebook with 12:18's
western sky lighting from my window (no sun is seen, but it's
coming, just as that time. but that time that window was on my
back, and light (also from the similar angle of front-left) I
believe light doesn't matter, light of the match or a lighter
shines itself. Maybe day is an interesting coincedence, (it have
to check if it is, as if it matters) September 21 2021) so I
put it into grey, because light from the outside probably doesn'
matter, I have to look at light when I wake up in the night, it's
all about my eyes, not having constructed themselves
it's 12:56 and I washed my eyes to avoid some strings of mucus
snot from my sleepy eyelids. And now I cannot see the rainbowish
ring around the ball of light I still see, and now I know what was
the size of those rings and I measure them and I can only see the
step down in the light intensity. and the other step down (I can
only suspect) where the light ball ends. I go to watch it agai,
will report further. Now I saw a ring (not that distinct, but my
eyes were sorta outtafocus and I saw the other ring at the same
distance, the distance between the lighter and the rings seem to
be constant. Will observe more, will try to light some light at
that light or around it.
If something, those rings reduce in their size, I haven't shined
light again, I have to run to another room.
Flash light of the telefone around it didn't help, it only made
the step-rings (no rainbows, no distinct ring at a darker distance
from the main ball of light. just steps of light going
quntizing(?) resonating with some other wave? by steps down, down,
down. And light only made it blurrier and not seen at all. Maybe I
have to find a source of light with different frequency, to find
the resonance with whatever wave that light
source (flame) has.
Russia has to call Beatrix to be our queen. Whoever brings dutch
people into power will be new Peter the Great in our history
books. We are natural partners (our previous experience of
collaborating was positive, our flags form the same pattern or
red, white, blue, red, white, blue, red, white, blue. And dutch
may say that red white blue white red white blue white red white
blue white would be a more pleasant pattern. And then russian flag
turn into white blue white red. Don't let faggots rule the masses,
have a white eye, white's eye on the top of it. let's make our
flag animated, rotating the colours of red white and blue. Red
goes first? For russia its' dangerous (jews, we have such a
disgusting history of coexistence, whites better keep us
separated, but they probably want to make it gradual: somebody has
to be between them and those who are even more savage and retarded
than we are. Alas. But dutch influence can be spread further to
the south. Netherlands, unlike Belgie, had a successful history of
colonization: South Africa was better under their rule, and maybe
without that racial tension they can be even more decent in the
I have to deliver the spheric bath to my beast. The beast of
suicide got trapped in my psyche, and I try to pet it, telling it
to pride my bride. that grey text
is automatic writing, subconscious misunderstood rhyme while I was
write writeing some other what// okay, telling it to be my bride?
I was thinking of telling it that I will deliver something better
than death. the happiness! To all those suicidal comediens,
Я должен поставить (не доставить, как я сказал сначала, создать)
свою капсулу, бикос озэруайс зы бист уил ист.
до того кто
post postavlaet? dostavlaet po and do are cognates? it can only be
if b and d are cognates too.
as bi- and di- boths standing for two they are cognatic indeed:
two lips or tongue and palate. palate as palette, палитра плита
палета pallet, but palete, palate, they all probably have
different etymology. I should ignore etymologic dictionaries and
redistinguish the language from scratch.
Here I question the Овъ thing, because оный I understand today,
and овый I never heard of. So I think this is the false part of
this book, I kinda challenge it, until I'm proven wrong. Why I
claim so is that greek n is ν and russian writing system is
related to the greek.
But then I also don't know толика и сицева (толика часть чего-то,
сицевый это из ситца, друг ситный иногда говорят, но это всё) I
suspect them to be examples of other adjectives and how their
inflections behave, wherever they took it, in what ancient grammar
textbook, the guy who showed it to me did so in the context of
Novgorod manuscripts, I'll have to check the texts myself, the
example I found so far could be just misinterpreted оные, where it
would make perfect sense:
И собрались все со князьми своими, овые на конях,
другие же пеши, и пришли на брег. «Московская летопись, 117»
Колико could be a form of сКолько.
But then that exposes сколький производным от кий (какой) and къ
as a short form of кий.
and I see that if какой = кий = къ, then как is also къ. and
c-column is seen as column of question pronouns.
с (чё? че-го)
h (hv- wh- who, what, whose, where, when) h instead of
g, g probably wasn't different from c when this column appeared,
and then it was placed there insread of h, because h was not
k (какой, кто, k is the only candidate for question word, but a
q (que, qui) and it shows that lines are dialects. or maybe
each dialect had a couple of lines, hence dia- lect. but dia-
could be другой, второй. Just like russians need fifth line with ч
but who knows, maybe х is the h, because ц is pronoun of third
person, like це = сие, с is another це, and it is above it in the
alphabet. n for он, d for dat and dit. So pronouns are the
alphabet? A I U are personal? other some question or index, but
what is labials? M for me. W for we. В for Вы? I told you Вы is
you and is of the first person syllables, Ты is from Те, and thus
rude (you're not with us)
П of P is the syllable not connected to any pronoun s far as I can
see. And thus one of the most direct lines gets its own anomaly.
As if I never asked why the fuck Папа is labial when it's a male
word. And here I only have to find a personal pronoun
deserving that place to question the position of the p.
Could be of Pythagoras, who worked with Pi.
The alphabet could be of some other civilization, the one
Pythagoras didn't understand, They didn't expect somebody to ever
change it, so they decided only to give away the form and usage,
not the meanings beyond it all.
A We~Вы Ce Dit~Du
E F G H (E doesn't play as a pronoun.
Doesn't it indicate that this line is to go grey?)
I Je Kъ iL Me oN
O P Q R S T
U Вы~We (X of E (both are ex) or is it hw~ of wh~?) Ye Zie(they,
And by accident Z returned They and sie, which suddenly make
german polite way to say U is the opposite one, as if they
respected outsiders more, and didn't dare to combine them (the
westerners, I suppose) with themselves (the easterners, those who
used ты, sie, thee, and these forms are standard in low speech all
over Europe) so it's not geographic, but class standards (the same
way elite spoke french, where they used both vous and tous, so of
course it's much-much-more before that.
But I go further, And because of Me and We I say that two lines
were enough, and it reflects that dialect thing, and I go to this:
I (Je) Me K..... iL, eLLe, ils оН, оНа оНи
U(Вы) We X.. Y(you, a U-gang) Z(they)
Where K and X are question pronouns? But C is not only чё, but
also це. and it relates it to N, T, Z (zij is dutch they)
I Me Ko-го
У Вы (пл instead of fl, в instead of ф and
w, ᛳ and ᚹ and I question if ᚹ is vav and
if it's a needle, because internet tells ᛳ is oo.
U Wij Zij.. so dutch it is. I suspected it to be the most
important language of europe. Yiddish is also not that far. I have
do decypher latin alphabet using dutch and then I'll apply it to
hebrew alphabet through yiddish.
Xij would be great for dutch, but it's wie and wat. As if the W is
their question pronoun and U stood for U (for both U and wij and и
of I too) and Zij would be it's opposite. With X for wie and wat
standing for the unknown? W and X may look pretty similar, but
their pronounciation is as different as can be.
If there were only two lines, then those lines probably were
singular and plural (since columns divide pronouns by persons)
And using U Wij Zij thing as the pattern I reconstruct I-line as
Jij Mij Hij (the N looks like Н in russian and words in the same
Zij is both she and they (I wonder why or
how it could happen, but that is similar to german sie, which is
also used for U, I reaally wonder why)
or is I line Je Mois Nous? we'll ponder on this french way to look at it
tomorrow or the other day. Or that tomorrow will be this very
day after I wake up.
U Wij Zij
with us stnding between you and them?
With a flow protecting forest from the fire?
Maybe we don't feel red next to green right, but we like it next
to black or white because black and white are the buring wood, and
yellow too. And green is fresh vegetation which doesn't burn well
U is Y in greek
Y is IJ in dutch
so J could be Je
and I could be I
and Y could be U~V~W = We (but then why is Y you in english?
Because you is plural form too. And it is another example of
Now I guess french and english phonetic differencies of vowels may
be caused by the genetically differently built vocal tract. And
that is why russians living outside of russian-speaking culture
will feel some incomprehensible sadness. But there are more
differences in faces of americans than in faces of russians from
americans. We look pretty much alike, but english is for
englishmen, maybe others feel that sadness? But then americans
with different faces pronounce things differently. And that means
rusians also can speak with russian accent if they feel like it.
So why am I trying to lure russians into russia? Russia is a
mousetrap. So far I may speak, soon I will not.
Jy My Hy (Hij = He? Jij = Je. French je for I is je for U in
U is two I's? Because U is Y in greek. And Y is literally ij which
U and Y are second persons. (JiJ is J is I)
U is Vous (U~V, you = вы)
Je Me He (how nd why did Je become I in french? Did dutch brought
language to them? Because pronouns is at the vey basis of
language. What was before it?
protoDutch called protoFrench йи and they though йи is them. Yet
they also used m for mois. Or was it also an influence? I'm now on
very thin eyes ice or maybe drowning already. Let's go back to
French could be of completely different ethos.
Jij Mij Hij
U(Y. Ψ?) Wij Zij
Ψ in the previous line is caused by jij being three I's. third
eye! Y is eyes! eye was first use for both eyes, when people
didn't distinguish plural from singular, sometimes we still use
singular words for plural objects. almost never the other way
Zij is for both She and They because women were en mass.
If the second line is not only plural, but also female (like -a in
latin is used for both female and plural)
Jij as rude male form of the word Y (IJ, II,
second person? 213 as the order of persons? 231 is more
memetic in hebrew. Maybe it will be a key when we look fro
hebrew pronouns in the alphabet)
U is a polite female form of the word Y
Me is a male egocentristic way to say I?
We is the female polite way as they represent all their
Hij is male
Zij is female
where I took this hypothesis.
She=They? Она в значении масса. группа. толпа.
лаВа laBa? lip? лаба~губа? л~г? λ~ג
I have built my weird flat when I wasn't smoking weed.
But I smoked salvia plenty at that time. It wasn't illegal then.
And not that it was such a sweet fruit, but they have prohibited
As if it worked so well in the genesis period.
Prohibitions never worked, but they were implemented to provoke
free-thinking people to try it and maybe to shoo the obedient
retards away from it.
Either way, it doesn't work.
And they just announce: such and such stuff can be used to make
you high. And it's oh very-very dangerous. It's as if they create
some bullshit crimes to make our inner sociopaths be satisfied
with some petty crimes like transporting drugs from a dealer for
some to a client for others.
(or it's rather to a client for some, from a dealer for others)
And if the forbidden fruit was the tree of knowing good and evil,
it probably was vine, which gives pleasure of being drunk but then
it demands the pay off in the form of displeasure of hangover, it
made me think that in wrm climate vine probably doesn't go off,
but brew on a branch so that most grape (vinograd in russian)
berries would be full of drunk vine. This is a hypothisis pulled
out of some metalinguistic data, so it has to be checked by some
factual observation. But then if grape is the fruit of knowing
good from evil, in vino veritas makes sense not only as wine being
the truth serum. And then the vine itself could represent the
snake, as if the vine went far from a tree it clinged to and a
womn took it as a berry from the grass and was deceived by the
"snake" in this way. Is it possible? More than.
Why these words are not semantically connected? corroboration and
collaboration are somewhat similar probably mostly to the
recognized prefix co+-
this beauty is the biggest catch of this volume and for many
previous ones. Let's play with it some more
Je Mois Nous is french way to look at it. Also very much
and.. it goes nowhere. Ce tout est mois, mois, mois. Tres
Аз Вы Те?
Г in questioning k-column is for Где. is it related to коГда?
Что Где коГда?
Что Кто Где all these are of c and both к & г in cogda когда are too.
не знаю что это было, попытка выпытать какие буквы столбец
вопросительных местоимений составляют. Место имени-я. Имеют место
в таблице, в алфавите, где же ещё. ура!
Аз (ни суффикс а, ни артикль a, ни предлог à, а именно местоимение
Аз. я. ямс?
ему тому (ему сему этому, тому тому)
японские приставки а- ко- со- выдают мне другую местоимению: ему
и если е~a, то ам=ом=он. и он именно что корень слова ему, ону,
thinking of one weird line the 13th volume
froze on github: Lucifer is luckier
and remembering that by some interpretations Jesus and Lucifer
and Prometheus from Theus. Lucifer Lux's fil? or лучше (better
Gesu is Geez. Ge'ez? G's. son of Jah.
how dare I say prome is from? it's not primo. it's prome. what
Местоимение имеет место в алфавите
Friend of mine tells местоимение is вместо имени. но почему не
местоимени, а местоимение? где ищё используется слово имени -
можно ли там его заменить на имение? после имени? нельзя.
нет. смыслы разные.
Местоимения имеет место.
это два русских слова места имение. орфография is arbitrary.
кого, чего это же тоже местоимения. вместо какого они имени?
друг говорит вместо имени существительного (или прилагательного)
окей, тогда почему разные определения у одного и того же слова:
вместо имени. почему местоимение по чему это что с приставкой.
что это то с ч q. ч~q. (see gothic alphabet)
подушка б? pillow. p is b? may be.
Место. М-seat? seato? море того. more there, closer to there,
depending on the subject, more = to? at? why at and to don't seem
to be antonymous? Because it isn't latin.
on is на in russian.
I and ya (you) are antonymous перевёртышы
совместоно е обещание е
и совместоен ощущение.
ощу сенсу (ищу ощущаю? ощу это именно что от ощу-щаю, как про от
про-щаю. ощу-пываю, ощу-пью. ощу-пал. пальцами? ощу-пью what
meet meat? меси на мясо. метил? встретил.
если встр=м, то м = 5 (подобно тому как третья (mi) становится
пятой в огаме)
the way children who already can speak (but who still pronounces
стол like тор) коверкают язык ради шутки, они едва ли смешивают
губные с язычными, но все губные п, а все язычные к.
какокий for зелёный (нот кикокий!) he rocognized tha shor i of the
й at that stage though. It seems like humans have stages they step
Satan is the name I dread to utter. It resonates to the god's name
which's not to be uttered needlessly. Is Satan the real one? The
Seth? S-T? The final mother, death, sheiten (stink
probably related to it, just as sting.)
s and t somehow went l and t and I remember that I saw them as the
dashed and dashless variant of the same figure, but I don't
remember how I came to that l
If J can sound as H in spannish, and ᚼ(or ᛡ)
stands for both, does it mean Jerry and Harry are cognates?
и Жан и Хан тогда тоже. Халва Жалва (жмых)
орёт врёт жрёт,срёт
орёт и врёт are probably doublets
жрёт и срёт are probably not. because the meanings are opposite. I
am yet to find the words for antonym doublets, I'm pretty sure
there are such as наверное (maybe) and наверняка (for sure)
"жирдяй все мысли про жратву" exposes that жрать is related to жыр
жор и жир? жрать и жиреть.
When yiou write make a shelf and you realize there are two
shelves, and you write with a pen, you can cross out the a, but
it's not so easy with the self going shelves in modern
orthography, so shelf's work nice as the suffix, and I realize
that it's how some of them came about. men and man are
uncountable? because they die and multiply? and do they sound the
same? no, man is man, men is men, they're written directly so,
even though english a does tend to be closer to э than russian а.
still more а than э.
a keed кривляясь коверкал зелёный как какокий, не кекокий. I
wonder why. Maybe it reveals the equity of a and e (both are the
same form rotated 180 degrees) at some basic level of tha
tha is a typo but an often one, so that could also reveal my
subconsciousness still c holdning holding those structure, those
basic sc sc structures. a so c is t and c is h. abc are all they
ABG was the first line, but AMS is the oppositemost forms of them.
Or would T be more opposite to A than S. And to M too. Or as are
they all fricative and plosive M is B, just like plosive S is T.
Not plosive they probably were called then. short or double like
in й (и краткое, i short) and w (double u, double v - then U is
roman pronounciation, V is barbaric pronounciation. Runic axial
structure supports this supposition, supposal, suppository)
lie and love are the opposite? they are similare in phoneticque,
and thus I feel like placing them next to one the other. Is love
causeing lies? Is love a lie by itself? When I began this
paragraph, I was going to say of honesty as almost (or always) the
only rule when I allowed god (presumable Jesus) to enter my me. I
don't think it was some Jesus, I think I spoke directly to the
source. Like god enter me yourself. But I'm not sure, many of my
concepts changed since then, I don't go much into the memories
archive to move further forward into wherever the wilderness bring
me. I hope I don't get lost, because not in the jungle, but in the
mine I've been working for decades. And it's not even the mine.
What is it? It's as if some artefact I am undigging, like an alien
spaceship or a city I scan through the languages I can observe
today to guess where they could come from to reconstruct the
ancient structure without actually digging it out (because I
cannot dig out the past per se, only an image of it. a photograph?
a painting so far. Maybe that painting will be closer to the
photograph if ai makes it. And I recall the neuralblender, the way
I used it yesterday, and today I gave him a better quest (I fed
him with the clauses yesterday, to no avail, today I combined them
and it delivered.
and it seems that its diagonal orientation combines lineal and
axial structures. And that ого in the centre gives me hope that it
understands it, so I payed them few (five? five to two?) bucks and
ordered an image in the maximum scale. And now we wait. It's 15:31
and I ordered it few minutes ago, and I expect it to work for at
least an hour. But I forgot to enter the subject, so it will
deliver something she or he or they want, so I have to spend
another few bucks when it finishes.
What is interesting about those images, is that they are made at
almost exactly the same time.
the empty room with a tag empt at the corner for empty request:
and the same request of alphabetic structures of aeiou.ru, but
with a lower number of iterations:
It looks like it didn't understand much. I can naturally see that
it tells "words words words" or book books books and I see that it
tells that A is a wickiup structure I actually mentioned in the
last published volume. And I tried it on free characteristic for
few more times:
won't this chaos distract me from what I know by taking the place
in my head, the place that should take in only the related
material for analysis? So I won't do it anymore until I find my
own ai to teach and learn from.
Or maybe the same (or different) way my words motivated this ai to
make these pictures, will I be motivated by the pictures to add
something essential to my research.
Like those wickiups I see in A now I also see in Д when I looked
at it, but when I thought of it without looking I saw wickiups
carcasses in X, as if Х is a whisper form of А.
And then I remember of that image with the wickiup and that there
was another construction, which could be of B, bubble, ball. and
if пузырь does have this labialness, how could ball be cognatized
to шар? the way what is што? b~w~ш? We'll see.
Is Eris female counterpart of Eros?
Either way semantically she seem to relate
to err and error.
Finally I found a reason not to shave I'll give to my hater
hater = hating. and phonetically ing and er are of the same
pattern: vowel + lingual, and that is a syllable as in chinese
hieroglyphics each sign is a syllable. They didn't recognize
letters there. How can you unite too-too of a parahod and kar-kar
of a bird? Completely different sounds. So they catalogized them
all into their script itself. And it allowed further theorizers to
define all the sounds used by people. And probably it made our
speech more strict, but less colourful. Is the way chinese speak
that very most powerful most colourful form of it? Is it how we
all spoke,? Probably in between it was (chinese inevitably came
through its own processes)
съ мя (со мной)
Blue could be onomatopoeia:
Medieval Mad evil. (this is a meme with this subconnotation)
Fuck hierarchy I speak with my work. Freedom is a better system.
But is it at least this productive? I think Friedman proved that
the less state intervenes the best it does.
Black be lack. (put enough of light on it and you will see its
colour. is grey colour? is transparent colour? Is reflective
colour? grey is a form of black, light form of black. Is white
colour? Our sensitivity doesn't allow us to distinguish beyond
some shades of black? Grey is a colour. A colour between black and
white with zero other
AI are ones of us
ones of ons. ones ~ ons ~ us
бля ~ блин
have different transliteration of yus (previously nasal sound.
nasal vowel? and thus no is the claster. mno is the claster then.
okay. as separated from hijkl )
a b cd (c is more based in the sequence of
EFГ, and b reflects d in Б Д, ב ד ,پ ث, Բ Դ, Ⰲ Ⰴ, 𓃀 𓂧
and also ᛒᚦ and 𐎁 𐎄 which are see B and D as even and odd (you
can see it in the B and D too) but runic and latin are 2 and 1,
while ugaritic is 2 and 3. and 𐤁 𐤃 make
me question if they're 𐤀's ie 𐤂, nah.
E F Г (so c is the new form of g, simplified form,
not even drown whole the spiral, just a curve of it)
hijkl mnop (because p is of b, labial) qrst
ᛒᚦ makes me expect some staved mirrored ᛵ for an a. so that it
reflected Eᚠᚴ (and once again runes don't include the vowel in
their sequence. EFГ do, and maybe htat's why F
בד see the horizontal beams at the top in d and at the bottom in
a b c d e
f g h ij k
l m n o p
q r s t u
v w x y z
I probably look at it from this perspective, and though I like how
it's 5*5, I like how h ij reflect x y, I like the a b c d e with
the c in the centre as it's its own k, and s and nall look cool,
but I don't really believe it is anything but maybe the 5*5
lurking in the hindsight all the time.
In russian they say "денежки любят счёт" and it is retarded
because bill gates doesn't know how much money he has (or he said
he didn't) and in english they say "money love silence" (which
could be true, but could be also retarded: advertisement may bring
more money than you spend on it (that's the idea, actually, yet I
never tested if it's true. It most probably is) but it's not as
retarded as russian counterpart, especially because minuscule
suffix applied to money is told to be used mostly by poor people.
но ведь быть нищим = быть ни с чем, so I thought, so why this
new etymology? It's more poetry than etymology, but yes, I say
it is an etymologic candidate.
пластмасса = пластик
масса = ик?
-ic c ~ це, it.
esse, m esse
what is m?
matter материя мать мощь
-ic is esse? это лехко проверить
So I reform orhtography. I write лехко, мяхко, and isn't it ה uit uniting г & х.
hag hug хап (г ~ п)
a b c d
e f g h
i j k l m n
o p q r s t
u v w x y z
f = gh?
b = d?
it reminds me of this topic I had yesterday when I tested my first
delai delau (1st person in the second position, 2nd person in the
first one, as in U Wij Zij)
and I saw it as
Вы & Du but the third position is the third person alright.
and if b~i for bothe are female and soft, then bi ~ di? like
in the prefix standing for two.
and if du ~ bu
wry and rye sound exactly the same.
wrath and rough only differ in vowel a little, but semantically
they are much more the same.
думая о политике: я должен говорить о том, что вижу, но должен ли
я видеть хуйню? Не смотрю н смотри не ююю.... не смотри на хуйню,
не думай о хуйне.
не думать о хуйне, не думать о говне. как хуйне с говне
когнатично? почему? из-за формы? хуй? гов? жов?
странно, но непонятно.
еда это, говно оно?
это оно когнаты? дублеты? триплеты. хуеплеты. поищи ещё.. то? еда? it = eat! (only
eat is pronounced i-it, which maybe stands for take it, and the
same take could be the initial meaning of the negation prefix i-,
exclude something, illegal excludes legal? takes legals away? if
take~get (notice how they reflect
eachother, and I went researching some vashkevich only to see
that lukashevich was collecting the palindromes) then
and here I see how biliteral words are lines, those 231 lines, the
231 gates, thus each syllable is a gate. And thinking of
triliteral words, I see triangles similar to the ones used in
astrology (though I also have no idea about them, but probably
this is the gate to get it. to get and to get out, to get
something out, вытащить, get ~ to go?
And I see three times of triangles: the ones
coming through the centre, the ones laying at one side from the
centre, the ones laying on both sides of the circle, around the
And some more forms of figures become made
out of larger ammount of letters, so five-letter word may draw
a pentagram, and satan is 5-letter word, but in hebrew it's
three: שָׂטָן, with two letter text to eachother, thus it
draws a thin splinter, a wow-like figure. at the right
side of the diagram with the sharpest side diretly directly
downwo downwards. as if to it's heart, which is natural point of
view if stn actually stands for adversary.
деем - настоящее время, но сдеем подеем и так далее с любой
приставкой - будущее. Может потому что будущее время возникло до
настоящего? Настоящее время это между прошлым и будущим, как
второе лицо между первым и третьим (но в алфавите, похоже что,
первым идёт: Jij, U(Y, Ij. and I ask myself why does it go with
additional i for singular cases? Was i standing for singular the
way it stnds for plural today? Why would such castling happen?
castle is замок in russian, which also goes for a lock. castle
костьми ляжем? кажется я вашкевича перечитал (должен ли я копать в
него или отложить поберечь свою голову?)
победим - побе так же как приставка работает в дим = деем? деемон.
деемэн, помесь мога и человека, полубог. как иисус
дадим. все глаголы, заканчивающиеся на дим - формы будущего
посколько глаголъ и глаголь очень сходны, давай посмотрим на
неглагольные формы, заканчивающиеся на -дим. невидим. это тоже
форма будущего числа (неувидим? но "не видим" это глагольная форма
в самом деле, но почему оно в настоящем времени? Но с приставками
- вновь будущего.
но предвидим снова может быть формой настоящего. Пред- и с деем
организует настоящую форму. Не потому ли что пред означает
предыдущее состояние, и таким образом оно нейтрализует суффикс
будущего числа? приставки~предлоги, значит побуждающее к действию,
цели которые всегда лежат в будущем. у (будем когда у того места)
видим (что не только глагол, но и прилагательное, видимый. где
ый=он=he, ая=она=she оё=оно thus ё is юс, и она легко побращается
в оя, ёя, ея. её? ёё? ёно. её это к оно, потому что ея это к она.
т.о. формой её применительно к женщине они превратили её из
женского рода в средний. Или средний и женский род - формы одного
и того же. полотенце~полотенца, полотенце снаружи, обнимает,
значит она, нож и меч пронзают - они он. one. you have to have at
least two to be in it. otherwise you can be only at it. on it.
in is ея, on is его. но логики здесь не вижу. ий - суффикс ий -
in is ея, он is ий? on is ий. снова вновь не вижу параллелей или
on him, in her?
o~m, i~r? r looks like the i with a dot not above but after it.
weird. I've never noticed it.
her=hei? ей? or is H[h] of he – the Н[n] of он?
I use = in text, but why don't I use = in this case of – too? – is
= of texts.
in math it's =, in myth it's –, in music there is probably no such
sign, only some empty space instead, a pause. But I don't know
music theory to say it for sure, and it could be a coincidence,
but a coincidence deserving to be reseach it is.
делаем, но сделаем, уделаем, приделаем
видимся, но свидимся, увидимся, развидим
бежим, но сбежим, убежим, прибежим, разбежимся
им? это местоимение же. детям? если будущее. не обязательно
детям, кому-нибудь, тем кто будет после, им, ем в-с-ем.
is ч-like coursive r i with the dot before it?
fortunately crazy (high productive autism)
I found that I have to give lessons of ancient egyptian.
I know the basics of it, and this basic level of ancient egyptian
I will be giving.
And under the disguise of ancient egyptian, I give alemagne (all are wizards of some sort) and
In the course we'll just walk through all the hieroglyphs, so
knowing the ammount of those signs we can know the progress into
the subject we're making.
𓄿 a, legko (g is ה) zapomnitt potomuchto
i ij и s n:
ы=и, ɪ=ь (probably a glagolic rudiment)
-ы = -и = -s (причём, и в случае множественного числа, и в случае
-en суффикс множественного числа в немецком N и И могут быть
потомками египетского 𓏭
𓏭 даже звучит как и, но может в других диалектах как н звучало. (н n п р и)
-en & -и перекликаются с and (в голландском en) и и. третья
форма суффикса множественного числа, -s перекикается с русским c
[s] (with) which is semantically similar.
𓂝 𓅱(𓏲 𓏱) 𓃀 𓊪(𓊩)
𓆑 𓅓 𓈕(𓈖) 𓂋 𓉔(𓉓𓉔𓉕)
𓎚(𓎛) 𓐌(𓐍) 𓄡
a i ij a(o?)
b p f m
𓋳(𓋴) 𓊂(𓊃) 𓈙(𓈛𓈜𓈘𓈚) 𓈍(𓈎)
𓎡 𓎼(𓎻) 𓏎(𓏏) 𓍿
ḳ(q) k g
ch d dj
𓎤(𓎣) 𓐝 𓋓(𓋔)
g m n
In a came I saw yesterday these three runes were used for chests
of nornir (-ir is the norsk plural suffix, which you saw in
(in that game was some other trigrammaton,
but I suppose it was a false vile or in some other way unwanted
chest. I only played that game half of the time, I try to avoid
the games. You can see it if you click the image, that poisonous
well it was too, and most of the time it was these ᛈᚱᚢ, and notice how they are the same form, but
losing its branches. just as EFГ)
Три норны - Урд, Верданди и Скульд - сидели у
источника, вытекавшего из дупла огромного корня Иггдрасиля. Урд
была седовласой старухой, Верданди - юной красавицей, а Скульд
почти невозможно было разглядеть, потому что она сидела позади
сестер и волосы падали ей на лицо. Урд, Верданди и Скульд
прозревали все прошлое, все настоящее и все будущее. Всеотец
заглянул им в глаза, даже в глаза Скульд. Долго, долго взирал он
на норн божественными зеницами, пока другие слушали песнь
лебедей и шорох листьев Иггдрасиля, падающих в источник Урд.
And the names of the norns tell me, that probably they only know
that ᚢ is U (because that is the only sign actually present at
Bornholm's alphabetic runestone) and the ᚱ is not R, but B of
Belldandy. The young maiden, symbolizing the future, it all makes
perfect sense. But the order of them is interesting then: ᛈ thus
standing for sculd is in interesting company in unicode: ᛇᛈᛉᛊᛋ
what stands before it ans what stand after it are all some forms
of s. So I say ᛈ stands for Skuld, the main and currently reigning
mother? The present the future the past is the order? By the
importance it is so.
And isn't it crazy that I take my sources from some game? That
great game is much better source than some academic treatice,
because in the game many people participated and I can see that it
is made with love, so they must probably care (most probably care
I wanted to say, thus most and must are cognatic, because must
laid there well. Let's test this guess: the must beautiful girl in
the world? I most do it! Nah, not cognatic at all, but in that
context.. That context is interesting. they most probably care ~
they must probably care.. hm..
and searching for nornir runir returns not very much (rovas, not
runir is probably the word, I will look it in norsk later) so far
norns runes return some interesting things:
upd: I showed a pack of books the top one was городские сказки,
the second one was сказки о смерти, the third one was сказки о
счастье обратной стороны (значит не кврхногами руна, а лежащая
орлом) и это очень дурное предзнаменование, и учитывая что оно
было за час до операции, я не волшебник, а профан. кодлун
бестолковый, в аскезу, пожалуйста, но как аскету выжить на севери?
ЯЯ замёрзну, замру, праз мраз.
Колдунов сжигали не по дури, а по разумению. И я дабы избежать
сожжения должен бросить свои профаничесие профн профанические
изыскания. профан pro fan, for fan, aman man ma amateur.
Если парень выживет (он атеист, и из моих рук смерть уже видел, и
он согласится, что меня следует отправить в ссылку, но не в
острог, а в отшельничество. окольников отшельников. откольников. и
я очень хочу отколост отколоться от коллектива, it's in my genes.
Зови Славу, чтоб отцов моих призвал. Надо с откольниками
Баню надо сначала построить. Тогда будет много голых алкашей там.
Баню надо сделать в доме. Чтоб она была моей личной (на одного
человека) и не привлекала бы олкошей. окоша олкоша, акаша алкает.
я сумасшедш. я глуп. я должен заткнуться. так как я никто не
делает, и тому быть может есть причны причины. Я сделал график
работы на недел. должен закончить прихожую до конца недели.
сегодня понедельник (снизу куча текста из предыдущего периода,
шесть экранов примероно, но они имеют больше прав здесь находиться
чем этот бред. даже в серое убирать не стану, тут всё надо
просеивать. I should weed the text out (to take all the weed out
of it, to make it solid)
Счастье балует. Я разбалован, я разболтан, loose, рад раздолбан,
разъёбан, в разнос, растеряша, растаман, растафарай, weed smoker
thus lured into this other people's religion, should go home,
should be glad.
upd: that guy survived and in good condition, so does it mean that
tarot doesn't work? Of course it doesn't, even those books were
not tarot, and speaking of tarot I was thinking of runes. But I do
believe that their effect is based upon psychological programming
(if that guy saw what I've seen it could mess him up) even though
those books were not runic dice, I must stay rigorous and delete
these things outta here.
Привелчь позор = привелчь внимание
(не знаю чт заставило меня написать привлечь как привелча.
наверное потому что пальчцы на е и л стартовали одновременно. но
прочувствовав это вд.. движение понял, что л палец просто какой-то
микровывих имел. и покрутив его вывих убрал.
сидь как сыч
видь как врачь
в и з are ph.. linguish.. lablia.. labial and lingual forms of the
same. (words of those whose tongus were cut out as an ancient
punishment. And those who were left alive but without lips. Why
would people make something like that to some people? As средство
устрашения. Если носы и кисти рук отрубали, то может и языки с
губами трезали тоже. Наказание раба? Устрашение рабов что какие
желание это чувство. хочу значит чую хо.
именно так. a ho.
ho as high too? maybe, in more common senso of want.
from now on I lieve typos as they are, I only repeat it af if it's
necessary, of or if. are triplets.
I heard triplets more than doublets. doubles they are. I heard
double more than trepple tripple
Вредное знание: что usb-port можно втыкать, посмотрев на шов на
металке, тогда как до этого смотрели на менее доступную (подлазать
смотреть иногда приходится (но если запомнить как комны их
располагают, то лишь один раз в профиль посмотреть. )_ ) но глаза,
похоже, напрягаются излишне там и злятся что можно же было глянуть
где гораздо лучше видно. и синий отомрёт (его хуже видно) потому
что 3.0 большинство техники, которая заявляется как такая, не
идёт. может другой цвет прокатит, но тёмно-синий нет..
светло-светло-синий быть может прокатит, когда они (будуверитт) учу учтут ошибки прошлых лет. но серый эдин эдит делает текст красивей.
возвращает в мся -мся к серым правкам)
666 is.. probably three lowest cards in durak deck. fool is the
first tarot card. the first game most of russians play. And card
games can form character. Or it can define it. Or it can program
or is cognative to if through of whihch is or in dutch and closer
to if in phonetic side. and can also be cognatic in the context of
"in the case of" and maybe if is the very abbreviation. i as in.
and f as of and the case is just literally naming of the things
and abstracts. abstracts as pieces of text explaining the
dantists are maniacs: people claim that they had some tiny black
spot on the enamel and the kike of a dentist drilled into it
leaving a cavity he then filled with some undiscol.. uns..
undisclosed filling (those fillings was found poisonous too, and
microchip set into the tooth is often reported.
The only reason they don't take them off is that they profit on
population having bad teeth. No other animal needs drilling (they
may be, but animals are fucked up enough, they don't have to fuck
them up more. Also veterinarians are medics too, so they don't
allow dandy'd dandies to drill thei pationts their patience..
tat.. patience.. patienc.. patients.
parents are patients? this is a programming: they make us give our
parents to dismenbet or r to those me madics.
in 1000 it's only 3 nines, three
9s, but also because it's the lowest card there. three 9's in 1000
game is -120. 120 is very important number in that card game
(that's the limit of some sort, but only because all the cards
equal 120. What is 120?
8 12 16 40 44
36 40 44
what may all that have to do with the
123456789101112131415 is 120 (all the cards of tarot up to devil.
could it be that devil was the highest rank and cards after that
was introduced during the reformation of a sort, to conceal its
vile nature of 999 disowning the jprofits. was it 666 or is it an
Лучшее, что можно сделалть для величия России это т.. отъебаться
Королёв - великий, но он сопротивлялся режим сначала до того,
когда русские пошли давить немцев, и он помог остальному ужасу
закончиться быстрее (и ссал наверное по законам военндого времени
попадать (пропадать шis црф what gпопадать is)) rjulf когда
участвовал в создании кан катюш. И до тех пор, пока не объявили
сралина мудаком и пообещали больше так не делать. но с брежневым
начался застой не случайно, а закономерно. рук ругательства не
помогают (они грязны, неотёсаны, живые но безумные. часто полны
проклятий или пошлятины, подразумевающей то, что даже не говорит:
fuck them as a curse means fuck them to death with a crowd of
faggots. when they're themselves the croud of faggots is when
we're in the deep troup trouble. Homosexuality being outlawed is
simply a tool to control their own ranks and to pretend to be
heterosexuals, when they're such sociopates, that they disowned
every moral norm and skillfully find their way through our
So now we wait (we the russians, I am not haelpened by them maybe
not because they're retarded, but because they're aware of the
world they live itn. They expect to be eaten if they stick out.
Maybe I should keep my head down working, so when the time is
right we shall ri reign again.
if of or are is? ir?
..22221111=144.. 12 square but what does it mean and in the
context of 120? probably nothing, it's with those 120, A is that
11 too. I probably should keep it grey, it's so embarrassing.
What am I doing here! It is such a poor science. I spent two
days with retards who happen to be my relatives and we played
cards and drank alcohol.
I actually drank for three days in a row (the first day we
played God Of War in another normies company, so games become
much more importants the.. n.. than they deserve. Aren't then
and than by some reason a the same word? more then you? makes
sense, actually, the distinguishing was proably caused by the
"i'd rather be pissed off thæn
pissed on" ambiguities)
Королёв - исключение (возможно, учёных расстреливали за то, чтоб
они ужаснулись и начали сотрудничать и лишь худшие согласились
покориться, в то время как великие (те, кто могут сделать то, что
не могут другие) понимали сколь высоки стави ставки и принимали
мученичество, для того чтоб врагу не достались плоды высшего
разума, я понимаю ставки и тоже скорее бы поб.. погиб.. но я же
сказал, что готво готов уже хоть с чёртом лысым сотрудничать. Чо
скорей всего не правда, я бы получил нервные нр нервный срыв и
разорвал бы сделку (нашёл бы способ это сделать, я очень хорош)
r looks like y mirrored mirrored y. ed=rim? mi=ro?
похоже что : это литературная форма знака равно
квартира. что значит ира? квартал all quart.
quart as in q guard.?
ира по смысл "несколько", кварт тогда значит "комната"
или "одна", тогда кварт значит квартира. пунктира. пункт значит
точка. ира значит несколько, следовательно кварт is kaamer.
square. хэс зы сэйм quar as quartira. thus square is kamer, the
quart. quarta is fourth.
Today I was at Haiduk concert. And there I heard the word икибоб
(which I immediately decyphered as бобики. now I see the funny
that it sounds as Iggy Pop)
вор+rogue = ворог
братцы борятся. бр отцы. бр ат. бр от.
Let's retell this book again and short this time:
Three mothers, the ancient cult, the triple goddess, the mu.. the
moon cults, female deities, lay in the basis of human
alphabets. (the branch explaining this in detail)
Vowel, labial, lingual are the meaning of those three mothers, and
the repeating pattern of the alphabets. (the branch explainging
this in the detali: LMN as three mothers (L
as vowl) UVW as three mothers, triplets across the
alphabet: xyz are also three, those though (those =
Raw data the previous iterration of this project went distorted
I am wayiting for the
(end of new iteration's draft)
Runes laying in a row for past-present-future can be compared to
the new-found semantic of the alphabetic order:
Jij Mij Hij
U Wij Zij
you in the past. me in the present. they are in the future.
And this one is a very powerful finding. I should print such
things on the walls.
H as if preceding to Jij and thus seem to be of the previous line,
but that seem to be about all the dutch pronouns, and thus this
seem to be the whole set.
Only U is a polite form of jij (also known as je, thus mij is me
and hij is he, but only in english, Wij is also We, but Zij is
whether They or She. And here the unity of S and T is seen. And
thus I see A M S and A M T in Je Me Te (te is tou too, but not he,
what is going on here? te is те, they, not ты, not thou.
the plural form of jij is jullie
jullie: From earlier jelui, from jij (“you”) and lui (“people”).
so there was no plural form of jij (and maybe other pronouns too?
we=me? we is plural wo (me))
jij mij hij
hij jij mij is the order, actually. third person first? this is a
blasphemy of a sort, it makes me read alphabet the other way
around: mij, jij, hij.. ga fa ea da ca ba aa (these others make no
sense so fare)
hij iji jij mij wij zij
and I loked looked for the otherw others, and I have only found
and the most interesting was
and further on https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/abt#Dutch
h j m w z
and something we found along the way:
'ie he (ie is he, he = hij, ie = iij. and thus
ie (he) relates to jij (ye, you, and thus
'k ik (I)
'm hem (him)
'r haar (her)
't het (it)
once again I mea.. mea.. meet labial for male and lingual for
female. Earlier today I noticed a.. the.. that батя and брат both
begin with b
those apostroph pronouns reveals more in Welsh:
I like how they distinguish first person as labial, second person
as lingual and the third person as vowel:
vy dy y reminds me of beth luis noin, also beginning with the b,
and then that b used to be the first letter and a only later
become the first. The last will become the first could be an
ancient saying (marxists want to steal and they only can steal,
for the talentless pricks they are)
I'm looking into modern languages becuase I believe the basis is
preserved somewhere somehow even if just by accident.
There are other short wordjes ending with -ij:
bij (bee, by, at, to, on, in, of, with, upon, towards, beside,
over, up to date)
dij (thigh, haunch)
gij (thou, you, ye)
lij (lee, even I haven't known this word, a side sheltered from
pij (frock, cowl, both words I didn't know)
rij (row, queue, array, tier, file, rank, string, range, chain,
course, set, field, swath, stringer)
next closest words are fijn, kijk, vijf
There are other short wordjes ending with -e:
te (to, too, in, at, on, into, inside, per, over-)
kijk is watch! in dutch (is it the actual etymology of that slur?
the advice to watch those faggots)
another understanding about homosexuals: even if they ruled the
world, they would not embrace homosexuality, because people would
still disapprove it, because pederasty is next to coprophilia.
And shit is bad in general, and that is probably where s and b
meet, b and t is the same before we recognized shet from fed. ʃſ from f (ʃ is swashed ſ.
swash is a meaningless decoration (at least until found the
ſ is undashed, and thus it's primal, aint it? (isn't it. i~a, s~й
(j is й in ipa, but may be also read dʒ, so
I prefer й)
a is read as ai too, thus
a = be
a man ~ be man
a ~ b, just as I noticed this triple forms to form:
They are like inhale and exhale: clockwise and counterclockwise.
If you try to rotate only one direction, you will eventually twist
аб even look like that. And since I can search every symbol now, I
don't have to mention national names, and thus that concept
becomes more euphemeral. That is some abstract concept, and we
should defeat it by further abstract thought dismantling its
necessity the same way it's necessity was spoken into the world by
some political treatices. I should read Machiavelli and Plato, to
force fed myself with that simple to communicate with those power
freaks more productively, because that is what they have read.
Those works are not read by scientist kind of minds, because they
find logical inconsistencies in those books immediately, and thus
humanities are not taken seriously by the stem crowd, because they
all found those treatices lacking, but there are many othere (the
most, actually) who also lack in logic, and thus they buy into
that bs to impose all that bs upon us. So must I make that
fundamental analysis of their anal bull stuff? (there used to be a
dot instead of that ?)
dot is 。and d&t are just a frame of that .
oh and o are only stylistically different or is o lack that w
sound h stands for. and h being similar to u in that h is H is II
is Iɪ and u is ɪɪ maybe? in coursive u looks like ii very much,
and ij is y in dutch (see, for lnagu a language s phenomena I have
to use the national names) and j is swashed i (general phenomenon,
so maybe ij = y should be left without comment (or in a commentary
Υ stands for U and looks like Y and thus u and y are cognates (let
me call them that)
and thus y~h, and H did stand for И ин old russian, where it came
from (I still need those words. I will
research those words too, what are you talking about!)
This way to print something in grey will probably save much of the
ain't ~ isn't
is = be
ai = be
i = e?
ai = be? = co? = du? nah
ca? da? nah, still nah.
isn't it too much to pull out of the colloquial
is = a?
be = b?
are = c? d? r?
a b r (r ~ г, of course, in opqrst sequence r is between q and s
both of which represent different aspects of c, and coursive r
looks like coursive ч, which is definitely c, and in the уфхцчшщ
sequnce, ч is more related to ц than ш, and ш definitely stands
under s, for those are both readings of the shin, and щ has no
better option than to stand under t, because what follows is
ъыьэюя, but maybe ѳ did, depeo.. deposed from her l place, just as
θ is in greek (and θ is also high, like f, which i is probably a
half of it, the other half would be t. And thus that cosmic ed..
egg was in the form f of ft or 🜃 or ♡ or ♡ or ❦(❧🙵❧ + ☙🙵☙)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fleuron_(typography)
another understanding about homosexuals: oppressive regime of
soviet union and north korean china could be the ones supporting
that degeneracy, so they could show at them as at the epitome of
freedom, implying that freedom isn't what should be strived
towards to (it came with a report about soviet tv in russian
prisons: all the music is russian pop shit, except westerners gay
shit like imagine dragons and weeknd.
Tarot and runic divinations could be that apophenic shcis..
schizophrenic shi schizophreniac tendency to see god's hint, god's
hand in random objects made into some cult. Great minds denounced
it, found it irrational and irrelevant and working only via
psychologic mindset, and I know this feeling when I dared to
believe in god (с моим складом
ya ~ я
we ~ вы
others are mostly sinonimous:
they ~ те ~ ты
that ~ тот то (the то)
this ~ этот сё (the сё)
is r ~ а?
is h ~ н?
он is oh!?
она is a-ha!?
him ~ им (тем тоже работает и с единственным числом в творительном
падеже и с множественным числом в падеже дательном: они пользуются
им, он прислуживает им)
him~them could relate to here~there
now I wonder if her and their is related.
Actually that U is out of the set, and there's another -ij
pronoun, the gij, so let's see where it brings us:
no semantic structure so far, but it's funny that each couple is
actually out of their own lines and different too.
ij = y, so technically it's
gy hy jy my wy zy
but maybe not, dictionary doesn't recognize them so.
говорить на ре
I always thought it was to speak in roarring manner, на рррррррре.
But now I think is it the musical note re which is rather low but
still a "повышенный тон"?
A tomboy saying "oh my cunt" made me think "is god an euphemism
for cunt?" a wild guess, I know.
Процесс по русски. по as in makes п=n be the main morpheme, and
vowel only coloured it.
n shows the surface we can climb (humans don't go on ceiling.
ceiling is с, off, and these two make it ΘθѲѳ
a letter to a friend probably having
something to do with this work, it's a good one, let it be:
Don't read books, write them.Time is an abstraction, extracted
from the natural phenomenon.It is a dimension and measure, and
those -mens- and -meas- are probably cognatic, doublets, because
in russian those words are izmerenie and mera, and these -mere-
and mera are the same word.
And we measured time with the movement of the sun, but we may take
any periodic change for the metre, so we take some ammount of
atomic frequency for a standard tied to historic units of time,
such as seconds of the heartbit and the weeks of a moonface (I know it's phase, but this cognatism is
awesome, you may try to play with it if you want to help me
publish it. Let's make it a-trois (na troih is a meme in
russian) if you feel like being my Hardies) and minutes
of 60 seconds, which I tie to sumerian numeral system. And 6 times
60 is 360 (which is close to the number of days in a year, but you
know it as degree system we probably divided the sky with to
measure its rotation during the day) and 6 is also sumerian, which
I didn't know: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30, and 60
1 2 3
4 5 6
10 12 15 20 30 60
remind me of roman
I V X L C D (here I have to
explain, that M is a later addition, so maybe these 4 lines are
So what I wanted to say in that context you probably know: time
travel is possible: we may enter our personal past and maybe even
to insert some events into our memories, changing thus our
personalities. And that takes some technical inventions, but the
principle is here. We all have our personal past, and that is one
of forms in which the past is preserved. Others are image of it
flying away where we probably never reach to see the earth from
the sky in the year in the past. The other form of the past is the
present it brought, but this one is almost impossible to decypher.
But maybe Laplace's demon could observe the world and predict it
forth and back, forth by building models and comparing them to
reality until it learns to build the perfect ones, and in the past
as a detective, but there it would be harder to learn by
Either way, ask your questions if you like what I say, let's make
it something more.But here I remember that I wanted to say that
lack of time-travellers may say that we're not in a simulation,
but I see that this argument has many holes in it. I cannot even
prove that if physical time-journeys ever invented, they'd prove
that we're in a simulation. But we should build ourselves
simulations, to preserve our bodies somewhere we wouldn't have to
care about them. But unlike in Matrix movie we should be in charge
of those sarcophaguses, if we were burried in the personal pods we
lived in, people will never have conflicts with relatives about
the real estate as poor people sometimes have, people wait others
to leave them inheritance, which makes society uglier. It is
probably not the only cause of humanity being fucked-up (please
edit these out, I speak as I think, and english is not my native
language, so I know I need some editor) but probably by
eliminating those causes of insanity or low-class, we may turn
this world in a paradise. We came here to make this place better,
why else would we even bother coming.
But that book would better be a way to sell the capsule thing to
some powerful enterprise, none of us seem to be enthusiastic
enough to make it big anyway. And TIME is coming. We see in the
future every day. Actual travel would be fine, and that would be
provided by the simulation having more computational power and
thus being able to see into the future more clearly and further
than we can.
Imagine the model of the future you can live again and again until
it actually comes. And maybe if everybody is satisfied with the
capsules fully, we don't have to worry about the immediate future,
but calculate what could be happening thousands years ago (which
would be invented how to see by the ai right after it learns to
see the future and finds the principles upon which the time
What if wars stopped not because Trump is some mochiah, but
because I am? God divided nations by splitting their tongues, I
show that all the alphabets are the same system and further on
that we all speak the same language. English we is chinese wo
using russian grammer to have that plural ы suffix.
I show that all the languages have some unique element making more
sense than some others, so latin alphabet has the k-column and
thus demonstrates that structure more clearly. And ABCD structure
(c is of that k-column, so it's c-column, and thus includes S too.
And S~T only because C~D (c~d) in ᚦ and in ᚲ ~ ᚦ
And another reason for M to be moved from its labial column: imkl
sounded dirty imkln could be plural of that кол (but the dirty
part was if it was not кол but кал, though I don'tk now what the
etymology of that word and or how ancient it is, it is dirty now,
probably was dire dirty for some time now.
is dirt related to dear? dear t? дорогая сердцу семля? filth is
fails? or false t? mud also has that t at the end? after ma? like
mother earth? who rknows
внезапно я понял тайный смысл писать с
опечатками: все опечатки из поисковой строки мои!
ну если даже и не все конечно, некоторые
I M KLN could be I am column, and the M being replaced could be
responsible for that m in the word column (compare to russian
колонна (kolonna, but then there's a toponym коломна, probably
standing for the same word) is колонна plural form of кол? or is
that колом она or колъ мна (big кол) is it?
I M K I am key, And probably that is the key. Probably simplifying
all the words to these three keys we may recognize more lexics in
neighbouring languages. And geographic distribution may
demonstrate some ethnic structures, thus demonstrating us the
correctness of the interpretations.
A B C
E F Г
I M K
O P Q
U V X
now u row is a fricative form of the a row. v as fricative b, x[h]
as fricative c[k]
and u is long (next to fricative) a: aa=o, oo=u, so u is 4 a's and
it could have something to V standing for 4. and now for 5,
because actually it's fifth, but one of the lines is of later
origin. I think of I because of that m mess. And also of E because
it's also rather messy. But maybe it's O because it repeats the
what? because semitic alphabets have O and U as one, they have
only 4 lines, and thus they have this key clearer than runes.
Actually no, bornholm alphabet also has 4 lines. and o seems to be
the ultimate, for aa=o which runes (and ogham, btw, too)
demonstrate. It is I-line (why would I be in the centre? and other
lines pretty much make up the structure of occlusive/fricative and
voiced/voiceless. And if that was all, but o is the sun which is
four quadrants of swastika, as this brave pastor said:
it russian those occlusive and fricative are named funnier: смычковые смычные и щелевые, as if
after a fiddle's bow and a slit
thus showing their male and female structures? Thus baba and papa?
but baba is female word for granny in slavik languages (it is
father in arabic) and that crushes this card house. Other houses
stand still and firm, and this one doesn't want to go up. So maybe
I'm wrong? Mayb labials and linguals were not recognized as male
and female? Or maybe some barbaric lexics of those who spoke some
relatively more ancient lanug language infested good old noble
structured language recognizing mommy and daddy as the distinct
entities? was baba some word for familia фа-ми-ли-йа? фа-ми-ре-ля?
two females and two males like sister mother fother я? папа мама
ляля я? а-а-а-а-я-я-я
Никогда не мог понять зачем евреи спаивают русских. Вам что водку
(шутка в том, что это сказал (бы) русским, будь по быстрей)
to recognize и узнавать share the gnize~знать and I don't know if
that z is the з added afterwards or the ть проявившаясь в
английском подобно тому как это произошло в слове to beat, where
(if we compare it to russian cognate) to doubled, unless it is to
be at. Because semantically it is what бить means. And thus maybe
russian бить is a borrowing from english beat.
and there I see that at could be to, because semantically they're
pretty much synonymous.
reco- = у- ? it makes sense if у (at) is closer than with (со-)
Is with у и с? два сходных предлога слиты воедино?
is th с? I thought co [ko] is со- which is the same with.
the is се, so maybe th is с after all. And then се (this) is with
(wiht us? here is with? this is with!)
th~w and wonce again w ~ c, b~c, в~г.
Met some ray'n-bow-ish rays in an old video:
Whatever this thing is, it unites the match'es halos and rainbows
in the rays I mentioned in some regular
offtopics. Even if it is some effect caused by the lense,
they say there are lenses in our eyes too.
A M S as are am is correlate by persons the Jij Mij Hij & U
Wij Zij thing.
Straight and direct are funny cognates, because they have the same
right in different forms and also show that s~t or c~d.
Is cavalery camelery? Is chavale camel?
Geocentric point of view is not only factual accurate (because all
the movement is relative) but it also allows us to see into the
concepts of the past.
What is Juno?
3 Juno is a large asteroid in the asteroid belt.
Juno was the third asteroid discovered, in 1804, by German
astronomer Karl Harding. It is
one of the twenty largest asteroids and one of the two largest
stony (S-type) asteroids, along with 15 Eunomia. It is estimated
to contain 1% of the total mass of the asteroid belt.
And that previous diagram contradicts the Kepler's trajectory of
And that cardioid-like shape they attributed to Mars is attributed
to Mercury in this one:
and their Mars is different from both that one and Kepler's too
Jupiter has the same trajectory though.
That search seance showed complete lack of accurate information
about these trajectories, which supports my suspiction that it is where magic begins. When
you know where the planets are you may feel that you have your
gods on your side. on your sight. And that can work. Maybe as
placebo on psychological level only, but if it works, it works. Look at this retarded shit, how can the sun be
closer to earth than the planets are! (later
I show why they are, so which other claims of mine are this
ignorant?) But eithere y way it's Jupiter's orbit
contradicts teh previous ones, so it's some real mess in the
geocentric diagrams, and once again that shows that
religious people are kind of retarded.
But it seems what it shows is that those planets are opposite to
us all the time, because the following one supports that Martian
orbit, only that's Mercurie's (the tiny ball at the opposite from
the Venus one)
but still that picture is unbelievable, but then I realized that
they're actually further from us all the time, because we're that
closer to the sun than they're.
Those 22 are Mercury, according to that diagram, and then jews,
who by some "accident" have 22 letters like that planet does, on
its 231 gates, so are they merchants or marxists? Because if
humans somehow confused mercury (said to only be seen on the sun
disk) to mars.. they just layered the orbit of previously known
planet (my guess is Mars) to the new one (new ones ~ nuance:
that's a new ones) and thus confusion began. My guess is they were
always martian, but they tried to rememe into merchants when
Mercury was discovered?
The ancients knew Mercury by different names
depending on whether it was an evening star or a morning star.
By about 350 BC, the ancient Greeks had realized the two stars
was it when the deity became androgynous.
So not before 350 BC the orbit of Mercury was drawn, and because
Kepler is the top-notch scientist, I suppose it was drawn around
his time, 17th century. And if he's so top-notch, let's lean upon
his martian orbits, especially, because they're not exact number,
which looks more natural and less simplified,
I hope he doesn't say that b is the sun, because the distance from
sun to earth is about 150 million kilometres, and to Mars it is
from 54.6 to 401 million kilometres, and according to this that
image I first dared to laugh at is the most accurate one.
So is Kepler wrong or is it actually 7+ perigees?
What I know is that this is directly connected to the alphabet
thing, because both are next to magic, and this is why it's hard
to find good information about it, and this is why I have to ask a
friend of mine to make it from the astronomic data if those
planets are even observed. Jews are named practicing if they're
_observing_ the holidays. The word is related to serving, to serve
about? what is on ob-
ob- a prefix meaning “toward,” “to,” “on,” “over,”
“against,” originally occurring in loanwords from Latin, but now
used also, with the sense of “reversely,” “inversely,” to form
New Latin and English scientific terms: object; obligate;
oblanceolate. Also o- oc-, of-, op-.
Some how I knew, and I knew that I knew.
The modern data supports Kepler:
only it tells nothing of the sun. Where is
So that is christians with their 7 are militant marsists. And
muslims with their 8 too.
While Jews observe Mercury and are merchants, not fighting their
wars themselves, but buying goyim to fight themselves, when there
are too many goyim.
I told you I am crazy for looking at the world from these extreme
positions, but because it is forbidden it is sweet (who would want
to discuss that! otherwise) and because it is prohibited I feel
like I must transgress the law I find harmful to the progress
where information wants to be free)
First I thought how could he measure the distance to it.. and then
I figure out that he could measure the size he saw in the
telescope he's got by putting scale right on the lense or
So the question is could they know it before Kepler.. And the
answer is they surely could. Kepler's time is called renaissance,
and that re tells that it's a return to something they had before
the dark ages.
And Mars Kinda returns to it's 7-cycle pattern in about 15 years
(the tails are present, but if they observed whole 2018's, it's
about 15 again, but then I can see that the cycle is broke, so..
so what.. so why do I care? I want to pull the owl on a globe
again, don't I?
So, which one is Mercury? I suppose here it is:
And thus it's not only 22, but also 3. Is it the three roots of
And because it is so beautiful, let's have the others too:
So those who said that Jupiter has 11 coils before it goes another
cycle were correct, maybe others just took more coils because of a
longer time span, as you can see in that video, actually, where
it's about 76
Here it's 28, and it is truly magnificent, because I was born 28
I know that humerology is not very rigorous, but that's how I'm
going to memorize these numbers, it could be better only if
Jupiter took not 11, but 19 turns on its first cycle called large
circle or referent (the small circle is called epicycle)
cycle ~ circle (r~j?)
and the overview of the models used for the 2000 years:
1st model is an Aristotelian, goes until 1:43 with
earth centered spheres.
Then, there is the Ptolomaic version with those eccentric
circles (centered outside the earth)
that goes until 2:33. From there is the Copernican model
And here's something much more interesintg: the minimoon I've
never even heard of:
And there are thousands of such:
As of December 2018 the number of known Apollo
asteroids is 10,485, making the class the largest group of
near-Earth objects (cf. the Aten, Amor and Atira asteroids), of which 1,409 are numbered
(asteroids are not numbered until they have been observed at two
or more oppositions), and 1,648 are identified as potentially
as for that particular one,
469219 Kamoʻoalewa /kəˌmoʊʔoʊəˈlɛvə/,
provisional designation 2016 HO3, is a very small asteroid, fast
rotator and near-Earth object of the Apollo group, approximately
41 meters (135 feet) in diameter. It is currently the smallest,
closest, and most stable (known) quasi-satellite of Earth.
and Apollo group is not the only bunch of near-Earth objects,
there are many other.
There are over 26,000 known near-Earth asteroids
(NEAs) and over a hundred known short-period near-Earth comets
When you have a vision, compromisi harm.
but as s have the tail esle where as s goes up, as smoke. дымок.
ды=du=s (-s is mathematically the opposite, why do we use - if we
can use = and solve the problem. = is also without a shit shift.
I think I just invented a four-corner keyboard, where the button
is sensitive not in the centre, but on its corners. It's more iny
tiny motoc motoric sc skills. Those typos are like some clouds or
smoke, water or fire, gaseous water is steam, gaseous fire is
smoke, team ~ water? moke ~fire? use = also instead of ~? no, ~ is
mythic (literary) ≈ so math is mor e precise? Make space-bars more
arbit rary. or not? if we used to write without them, let's place
the m arbitrary, and we already see that thus it becomes meanings
different meaninging be.
That keyboard of four corners have to be ergonomic on those
corners, which no connors should be.
connor is con as in conmen
is it the story our culture had us to give.
I realized that 14 is the next to 15 which I ound to be
the original tarot: 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14+15=120 which
is what the deck of 9 to A equals in thousand game, and that game
could be the I V X L C D of 365 or 666 which is a letter next to
15. And we came here from non-tautological trope.
I V XLCD ness of the U F XЦЧШЩ
and probably L is also of C, and thus
I V XLCD ness of the U F XЦЧШЩ
And maybe c~d and is it
I V XLCD or
I V XLCD and U F XЦЧШЩ
I V XLCD and U F XЦЧШЩ
and k-column is some local roman novice, other alphabets don't
Because the myth tells of B and T as two letters, and thus more
precise in the context of this book is
I V XLCD
and U F XЦЧШЩ
and here I see river dividing life from the fire. But according to
cabbalah (kaaba allaha)
but in that new colour, where linguals are not greek but ellok
(not green by but yellos yellow)
But in cabbalah shin is for ash, fire, because shamaim is steam
and thus air. Jews disregard earth for air? They are those who
reecognize air, but don' t recognzie that there are four elements
now. They ignore the earht? I need to read all the versions of
So this work. What is it? It is a draft indeed, I'm pretty sure
most of us have this raw stuff untill something grown out of it.
And then I have to co cultivate . and mae make it ripe . and
then to rep to reap it my self. I reputation of reap? or of put.
Reputation puts on your plate what you put into it. it reputs.
plantation plant 'es? plant ates? plant eats? station stays
plantation plantays. plants, planties thus? planters, ain't they
are? I think I say j as r in y standing of r for ir somewhere
above. in cycle and circle.
cyc ~ circ
psych ~ circus
Church also relates to psyche. So soul is a circle? Circle of
life? What comes around goes around and what goes around, around
comes. Well, that other part is not that certain, it may leave
this world forever. What comes around goes around means and that
From the central line rotates to the left line and then in the
same move jumps onthe the right line counter-clockwise:
(only in the context of what I recognized in the bornholm stone,
here ᛅ is ᛆ and ᚾ is ᚿ and ᚮ is mirrored
and in this variant o being double a is not that obvious.
and because the bornholm stone is so precisely alphabetic,
it makes me question the transliteration above more. And so far
it only affects the name of her father: is it really Uþinka or
and Uþinka Rus (рыжий) makes more sense, for she is also Red
then, and if what's before the ᚱᛋ (in the right bottom corner)
is not ᚢ but : which they placed between the words, then their
transliteration is definitely not precisely accurate.
But until I know better I work with what I have. And what is
funny is that thus it can be read by columns left to write:
This Monument the daugher of Othinka Astrith(?) erected
after Siegfried((?) aka Sigurd)
and that ᚱᛋ in the front of the last line is probably that Rex,
or konung, for I don't see that kunuk there, only k.
to close the topic, here's the translations into old-norse and
1 Ásfriðr made
2 the memorial, the daughter of Odinkar,
3 after King Sigtrygg,
Actually, wiki writes uþinkaurs in one word, as if the runestone
tore this word in two. Why would she tear the name of her father
in two? I don't know norsk, so I leave it be like this in the
form of a question.
Greek hex next to roman sex and further to russian shestt
demonstrates how h is next to ʃ and also how x may stand for any
affricate: wax is vosk, lux is luchsh as a short form of luchshy
which I actually never heard but only because of how
unpronouncable it is, but grammatically there it is.
Зубы это уродство (куски кости или чего-то подобного торчащие из
мяса. технически. слабое место организма, но парадоксальнейшим
образом одно из самых крепких, жёстких, пригодных для
перемалывания пищи и прочего мест) но парадоксальнейшим образом
выглядят неплохо, может потому что под губами, а может потому что
на жемчуг тоже похожи. Без зубов мы представляем собой или сбе
стариков. Может ли молодое дитя хорошо без зубов выглядет? Они и
выглядят неплохо. Manchildren. That is what I wanna be, manchild.
Евреи нужны для того, чтоб я осознал аргумент в их защиту "никто
не выбирал ни геном с которым родиться, ни культуру в которой
уродиться" дабы применить затем его к себе. Я не выбирал ли? Я
выбрал себе культуру из всех предложенных в этом меню культур. Я
кто? учёный. то моя кульута культ как культя. я не понимаю связи,
я пошёл её уискать.
Я мутнт. Нас на урале облучили когда моя мама была ребёнком в
челябинске. И батя где-то неподалёку обитал. Я потому и стремлюсь
быть мэнчайлд, что как квато.
I would be more of an artist in my younger years (like a
professsional artist) if I was more ambition ambitious. u~n The
ambitious as I got in my 30s only. I was bullied so bad, that I
went depressed and suicidal. School have broken be well. Well, I
break the school back. I forbid people to leave their children
with an adult without their responsibility. I prohibit
brainwashing techniques. All the culture should be volutary.
People should choose what to use. But we had it,
My bathes are not bathes but rooms. Bathes will be hanged in those
rooms. of net and plastic film. Or, someday, of
ехал наехал нахал охал охуел
охуй ехай езда пезда
хуй хай, а зда с да. писк да. да ма.
is i female? it is for plural, just as a is for both plural and
female in latin suffex/
fix фисть, это глагол? шесть глагол? шастать? штаны? ш как штаны.
ш как щетка.
фисть чисть, фисть вижи, вяжи. видь. can you watch it? wratch
watch? because I didn't see a good etymology for врач.
врачивать ~ наблюдать
блюсти вести? синонимия: блюсти здоровый образ жизни ~ вести
здороый образ жизни.
но бля не вя. бя. любя. б.лю. в.лялю. блужу брожу блудил бродил.
грешен крошен. прошен прощён? просил ко двору простил по утру.
врачивать вворачивать выручать (врака, в руку? врага в труху.
врачи witchi тоже недалеко от watch, видеть, ведать)
a b c d
e f g h
i j k l m n
o p q r s t
u v w x y z
Rafail Mikail Uriil
Lucifer? L was left as a left,
freedom-fighter, ther breaker of the
order. of what is right.
R is considered to be more ight, more correct pronounciation than
Л. Л has it's tail on the left, R has it's tail on the right. г is
also like this. And why did I write г when I wanted to write r?
And its position in the line of archangels is next to г of G. And
L is whether redundant or what, it is also next to Г which I
noticed many times. And if Г is I I don't know.
I I look like that index+pinky gesture. I&I looks like it even
more. Index finger indexes, shows, demonstrates, teaches,
explains, излагает. plain ~ plane, плоскость положена? объём
Рафаил лечит, Луцифер калечит? улучшает,
ага. как грудь или губы или пол.
Uriel /ˈjʊəriəl/; or Auriel also Oriel (Hebrew:
אוּרִיאֵל ʾŪrīʾēl, "El/God is my light" or "Light of God";
Greek: Οὐριήλ Ouriìl; Coptic: ⲟⲩⲣⲓⲏⲗ Ouriyl; Italian:
Uriele; Geʽez and Amharic: ዑራኤል ʿUraʾēl or ዑርኤል
ʿUriʾēl) is the name of one of the archangels who is
mentioned in the post-exilic rabbinic tradition and in certain
Christian traditions. He is well known in the Russian Orthodox
tradition (which considers him to be one of the seven major
archangels) and recognized in the Anglican Church as the 4th
archangel. He is also well known in European esoteric medieval
literature. Uriel is also known as a master of knowledge and
archangel of wisdom.
Seven archangels? I only knew of four and Lucifer the fifth.
Michael in the Hebrew language
means "Who is like God?" or "Who is equal to God?" Michael has
been depicted from earliest Christian times as a commander, who
holds in his right hand a spear with which he attacks
Lucifer/Satan, and in his left hand a green palm branch. At the
top of the spear, there is a linen ribbon with a red cross. The
Archangel Michael is especially considered to be the Guardian of
the Orthodox Faith and a fighter against heresies.
Gabriel means "God is my strength" or "Might
of God". He is the herald of the mysteries of God, especially
the Incarnation of God and all other mysteries related to it. He
is depicted as follows: In his right hand, he holds a lantern
with a lighted taper inside, and in his left hand, a mirror of
green jasper. The mirror signifies the wisdom of God as a hidden
Raphael means "It is God who heals" or "God
Heals". Raphael is depicted leading Tobit (who is
carrying a fish caught in the Tigris) with his right hand and
holding a physician's alabaster jar in his left hand.
Uriel means "God is my light", or "Light of
God" (II Esdras 4:1, 5:20). He is depicted holding a sword in
his right hand, and a flame in his left.
Sealtiel means "Intercessor of God". He is
depicted with his face and eyes lowered, holding his hands on
his bosom in prayer.
Jegudiel means "Glorifier of God". He is
depicted bearing a golden wreath in his right hand and a
triple-thonged whip in his left hand.
Barachiel means "Blessed by God". He is
depicted holding a white rose in his hand against his breast.
Jerahmeel means "God's exaltation". He is
venerated as an inspirer and awakener of exalted thoughts that
raise a person toward God (2 Esdras 4:36). As an eighth, he is
sometimes included as an archangel.
and I never heard of the latter four. And that makes them 8 not 7,
which makes it not a tradition, but wikipedia madness where people
may edit religious articles without religious education. For some
time I never heard of Uriel too. So
In Catholicism, three are mentioned by name:
R as a vowel? shaky, very shaky. Was Uriil included in orthodox
canon to match my structure?
RMG as three mothers? weird, very weird, it doesn't ring a bell so
far. MG rings a bell of a magi. And vowels were not important and
Raphael we knew as a painter, not an archangel. Michael and
Gabriel are more widely known (maybe because of some movies
though, ai-powered brains watch how often they are mentioned in
literature and bible)
жена русское слово. Man по-русски Муж, уж is adder.
Once again G is a russian word.
M and G are two sacred letters for masons. And I spoke that M
(mountain) and Ж (sun) ? But then Ж is the child mountain gives
birth too (or it is how it looks, and when we realized that beyond
that mountain sun raises too, we would have to leave this
misconeption. Also because sun raises at different points on the
sky, and it is горизонт, like горы.
M and G, это понятно, но где здесь Баба а ге здесь Деда. Разные
народы имеют разное мнение на этот счёт. Я знаю про грузин, но про
скольких народов я не знаю.. а если брать не слва, а буквы, то к
ним ещё больше разночтений (а может и столько же)
M это Мама или Ман? Ман с суффиксом. И этот суффикс не, как в
японском постфиксе най? или own, как в японском суффиксе но?
G это Joe или Gyna? Как и в случае с Ман, Жена с суффиксом. Чистой
формой М женское, губное, мощное, матёрое. родит. a G отче, Daddy.
Папа Кака или Мама Кака? В японском - мама.
MG Are Mary and Gesu. MGM probably includes another Mary. And thus
it makes very similar to MMM, the three mothers, and how do I know
this concept existed before I found it in wiki? Maybe it's some
conspiracy to distort human civilization? I is completely
arbitrary suspicion, and though I may want to double-check all my
basic concepts, this particular one is very organic and is
supported by the moon and by the alphabetic structures I never
heard from somebody else of. But I reconstructed it, and because
this is an instrument which seems to be forgotten for many
centuries, I can measure other concepts with it. And when they fit
it supports their authenticity, when it doesn't, it challenges it,
as it was with armenian alphabet.
Were Michael and Gabriel conceptualized when M was Manus & G
рука и вага как вагина? как говорят, сравнил жопу с пальцем.
отверстие с валом. маму с папой.
отверстие отверзнуто (не отвергнуто, отверзнуто, разверстнуто,
разварено, развалено, раздвинуто, разверз и вверг. вверг~вверх?
верх отвергает, свергает, верх твердь.
Because Making is active, when Talking is more passive, though
listening is even more passive. When hierarchies appeared,
Speaking (the G) became dominant, commanding, active. and Making
became passive and female, gals make some blow job.
If sex соитие, then wax ваятие (ваяние.
ваять) lux луитие (лучшее?) six сиятие? is it what * is?
wex ведие (ведьмовство?) rex (ретие ретиво решительно рьятие,
рвение?) х.з. this hypothesis doesn't seem to lead anywhere.
>Now, if you are healthy what
do you die of? You don't.
So we now challenge the next frontier: eliminating the
non-biologic or unnatural death factors. Some say of nanobots as
the next step:
But I would take bigger brains (some ai-powered brains knowing
all the languages and understands all the sciences and able to
explain it to the rest of my brains) before I take those
nanobots, I don't want to be enslaved by some nanobots,
possibility of which was also preicted, so I'll wait until they
learn how to take them out of it, so I'd hide in a space-capsule
of reinforced concrete and gardens to step-by-step becoming
autonomous of this world and then archivng all the civilization
we have online on your own servers in bunkers you buy or build
as you live, thus evolving from a human into an arc, integrated
into the servers with my own neural system, that would be some
paradise and heaven and hell you may play wherever you want, but
don't forget that people around you are also about to evolve
into some demigods or demiurks. Everybody's going to watch all
around them, crime would become less likely to happen, police
should be transfered to some other jobs: when cars are
autopilot, road police are to reeducated into road-workers,
until the robots are coming. Then we all rest and enjoy our
technically enhanced evolution. And the space will be explored
by drones. Who needs to get eradiated by the space when you can
see he same picture and feels similar emotions when you emulate
weightlessness by laying in an artificial womb not being annoyed
by lack of drink and hold of pee the way we insanely don't
support the flow of the river of life through our bodies. We
live in an arbitrary (non-perfect) world and if we make it
perfect, maybe we don't even need the gene-editing that much
because we just don't brake, not even a little, we won't need
telomerase, if somatic cells don't divide because they don't
and in hebrew axial symmetry the left and right corners are Mem
couleur et fleur
Now is it even lenses or sfx? I think I
should rely on my own xperimet experiments e instead.
The "crescents" here are waxing, could be a subliminal
programming, even if with lenses.
from a not sent message after a christine
telling me that there are some documents from Galileo's trial
telling that the church didn't consider Earth flat have deleted
Why do you give me so many empty words? You
could have quoted those trial documents yourself, but you prefer
to resort to old trick all cult-members (at least abrahamic
ones: commies, muzzies, christies) use: read all the volumes of
our bs and then some more, and then you know how are we this
crazy, maybe you go crazy yourself. At least jews legitimately
crazy at genetic level, you retards only have folie à deux.
Maybe that is why jews are called "people of the book": they
worship the written word (forgetting that any lie can take such
form) non-abrahamic cultists usually just offer to take drugs
listening to their chants and watching their pictures, and that
is probably the root of the war on drugs, that's a religious
war. But drunkards will fall, they all are more than happy to
smoke weed instead, but rasta and other witches don't tolerate
drunk friends. And yet alcohol promotes babylon: people often
drink not to think of the responsibility they have to carry or
ignore or both. And that is a social drug. And it wakes you up
in the morning. And church promotes wine, telling that the truth
is in wine, and maybe that is the drug Adam and Eve were
forbidden to eat (were grape turning into wine on the vine?)
because that fruit gives them knowledge of what is good (the
pleasure of being drunk) and what is bad (the hangover) as if it
teaches us all to pay (even though things grew for free then,
and still actually may if we evolve a little) though weed gives
pleasure and then may give some arts and science as a
subproduct, which is not payment, but bonus. Different
philosophy of life, a better one. And yet weed make you sleep
longer (because it may keep you awake for something got so
interesting so you was all on it for all the night. And thus it
may lead you out of the babylon, and that is the fundamental
abbys between (t)he-brew and pagan (paganki are non-edible
mushrooms in russian, and the psilocybe are also paganki.
What psilocybe may demonstrate is that consciousness and ego are
two different entities: consciousness is ourself present, when ego
is just a file about us alike to the ones we have on other people
in our heads. So that if you have a bad trip with some entities
laughing at you for doing something stupid, by telling "there's no
me" you may raise to higher states of consciousness, it's as if
literally you raise above leaving those laughing and mocking
entities confused and washed down as you get up. Even though it's
just a trick. The baggage of our karma does influence our present
state, but maybe if you feel free not to carry that weight, to
leave it be for somebody who cares when we don't, we may get
better, for as they say to some people "be yourself" is the worst
form of advice.
суффикс -кое идентичен слову кое (какое) т.о. слово как иденично
слову к: как ты ~ к ты (ближе к тебе, что контекстуально может
означать то же самое: как ты, более похожее на тебя, к тебе ближе)
мерзкое как мороз. такое как та
кой ~ к соответствует долгим и кратким прилагательным
к кой (какой)
с сей (но это не точно. но из-за долгих и кратких прилагательных
в вы? твой ~ вой (ваш) ? probably nah.
let's try to apply this short adjectives type of thing to other
я учёный, я учён. учён, но учёна. и я вижу в этом местоимения он и
она. И т.о. уч is the word, уч is the root and the stem, depending
on your terminology of or a point of
он ~ оный, она ~ оная. So -ый is not a some form of он, or if it
is, I didn't get onto that thus doubling of the morpheme (I saw
such cases before, I won't be surprised by them in he future, I
suppose is полагаю, энд зас sub of
sup is по?) полей побежал полетел потянул suppulled? no such word,
so stop this rambling or ab babbling.
babble is some important b-word? I don't know, but it is
onomatopoaeitic, whatever that spelling is, it pulled my neck
muscles to write that word I don't know exactly the spelling of so
very unusual it is for no good reason or is it, yet anyway that
word is hardly onomatopoaetic itself. poetic. not poaetic. whiy
that a is in there? it's onomatopoeic, they omitted the t. if it
ever was there, if I understandt that word right.
I avoid reading Sefer Yetzirah the same way I avoid other writers
on the topic to make my research independent, so we could compare
our findings after I reach the point I aim at. Or even right now,
among the path, this draft is probably valuable source for
comparison already. It's already enormous. But if we boil it down
to what I keep in mind, it is maybe not so large. But should I
catalogize those things?
1 Lineal system
2 Axial symmetry
3 Three mothers, three matters, aerial vowels, liquid labials, fower (fire) p
of linguals. sha+maim. sha+dai = ash+dei? дефис заменил на +, тире
заменил на =. Накоенцо я обеденил (бе днил.
сделал бе) объединил = обеднил?
Things I'm not sure of:
2. astronomic connection between three mothers and the moon (the
planet counting days, distinguishing neighbouring days from one
the other. whether monday or sunday is the first day may show the
geographic differences of the moon on those days at different
geographic points, that is a cultural differences, and cultures
are geographic) The sun calculates hours. But also years.
Maybe this is why година is hour in ukrainian and год is year in
russian. And hour & year also are very similar words and I
still remember confusing one for the other when I was studyiŋg English in school.
do gray and rain relate? Are they both
denying ray? Is ray of Rah? is 's of Rah's the 'i of ray the way
's is 'i in russian both plural and genetivus. And then the
other two cases of 's are the abbreviations of is and has: he's
a doctor, he's been working as a doctor. Do they translate into
russian with и? Он и доктор? Maybe. Он и (есть) повар, он и
плотник. возможно. Он и стал работать доктором? Более очевидно
это в he has something, but I don't think that has is shortened,
because that would lead to weird ambiguosities. But here has the
following example connects and (и) and with (с). He has a dog.
Он и собака. Он с собакой. Но вернёмся к перфекту: He's been
doing if for some time. Он и був деющ это како-то время. Ну,
такое.. This is still the weakest point of this guess.
suddendly I realized that painful prostate may be caused by some
toxic shit (maybe with alcohol residues in it (I drank three gulps
of vodka about 36 yea.. hours before that (see, potentially I
still confuse between u one another) feeling) you have to shit
out. But now it moans a little still, though it feels much better,
and I believe a buttful of hashish is the way it should be. At
least a gram suppositorie would make some difference and I would
observe it and told my findings. And then I thought of surgery, of
taking some cells from a belly, the fat tissue, and injecting it
into the wall between prostate and shit. Can fat take shit? Will
it not be additional cells to turn over? And here I said about the
risk of sarcoma and then I only thought if those cells be in their
place. Because they were born somewhere else which is probably
seen in their epigenome. And unless they were in our blood or
lymph streams and could easily become the fat near prostate (and
we have lesss of fat near prostate because so less blood flows
through prostate as I was told. A jew doctor masturbated my
asshole with a latexed finger. And I realized that witch doctor is
the opposite, because witch is pretty much jew backwards. And if
witches are jews or antijews I have to see in the inquisition's
documents. People may encypher words by reading them backwords.
The last I heard was ikibob for bobiki. And though I thought that
was the halves castled so to say, moved from a king to a double.
Now I see those halves are palindromic, so what it is is exactly a
polindrome, the term I found is палиндром-оборотень (verwolf
palindrome, where wolf is some and any beast in russian, they use
it to медведь-оборотень, т.о. оборотень стал означать волка лиш
потому что в английском он подразумевает волка, а потому голливуд
повлиял на весь мир. В некоторых народах оборотень-медведь более
знакомо может быть (волков они меньше боятся чем людей, может
быть, они их даже приручают)
I would write reliegion, polietics the same way belief is written.
And maybe that is supposed to be there, as for law is low as a lie
and lawyer is a sertified liar even though the spelling is as
different as can be, phonetically they are almost identical.
So if li is lie, then L is what. L is left. to leave. Whilre R is
right, to decide. Решать. Порешить ~ покрошить, убить. тогда как
to leave is отпустить. Lefts (before leftists took over) were all
about liberties. Rights were for strong arm of the right, of what
Leftists what are they? A governmental psy-op, a takeover, and
because jews are the most prominent leftists, it's whether they're
the state or the state (the actual Babylon which enslaved them,
the Babel, the Bible, the Ball, the
Baal, the Bull) uses them as the
scapegoats making the dirty work, because they're hated already
what do they have to lose in the realm of reputation, and they
easily mirror that hate many times higher maybe (because few goyim
know what's going on behind the curtain of official narratives)
порешить или полечить - грубое и мяхкое решение проблемы
Right and Light as the opposites. One obeys, the other finds other
m(ovi)e about the invention I
don't want to patent, but I want to have a copyright. I don't
believe I just said it. I want copylefed leaved left. But if
somebody makes business I want payments for using the design
we've'd to show. How much do you take for making a movie about a
man living in a 3 to 5 metre high hill, rolling out of it in a
rubber ball watching the road with a set of mirrors and a video
camera inserted into the upper half of the sphere (the upper
sphere is in its place, at its bottom it is open for the smaller
sphere which rolls the tubic roads or regular roads or plain
fields) but usually that sphere is an avatar, a camera,
transmitter, speaker, and the luggage if I need to move something
or myself. I use the word sphere instead of ball because it's
empty to make that a cabin for the cargo or ego. but I sit in the
hill usually. The idea is to reestablish the embryonic way of
life, because that way eliminates traumas and temperature is
different from the optimal most of the time in our world, so those
embryonic conditions may be a bridge leading from biologic
immortality we the humans have acquired already and make this
stuff affordable in a couple of decades (uncle Serge maybe can
afford it already) because it is few hundred grands now, it was
over a million usd about five years ago.
https://youtu.be/ScJNE0alsaQ (this is the technology I'm speaking
of, there they describe five patients with senile dementia (from
all the body of their patients, others did not have it or didn't
want to be oficially diagnosed thus) and that was made by genetic
therapies. I watch this field closely and I think they're very
legit (I can explain if somebody is interested) and I tell you
this, because I want to make it a science project, to set a new
standart of how science projects are to be made. As a work of art,
which is also beautiful in its comprehensibility. That word is probably very self-ironic.
Le centre Pompidou est à Paris
here they don't pronounce s
Are theys such good christians, that they are cristienne, in
singular or is enne en as in german?
such good christienne that don't utter the snake, but nake and in
naked. нага (naga) stands for snake in some southern language.
I was looking for that word, and I found that arabic have
some I was looking for: ع is that loop in ثعبان
and initial for of it is at the right end of this shortened form
of that word عبان and final form of it is here at the left end:
I don't find that naga neither in arabic nor in farsi. I look into
hebrew and I find נָחָשׁ and maybe I saw it in old-egyptian. Or in
Ave to google translator and tht they found
a better business model than to sell it to greedy us.We're not
that greedy really, we're more poor than greedy.
In amharic it's ibabi, እባብ
እባቦች is ibabochi, snakes.
Hail google, because I can use this simple
servis, thank you big man, thank you.
I think I went into a nigger mode, but it is
a better than those arrogant halfbreed bastards thinking they
can destroy it to prove themselves (to provethemsleves being
what? arrogant bastards? Maybe they're shivaists. I never
understood that servilityto a destructive power. Or maybe they
want to be destroyed.
I definitely see T with some vowel addition in that ች so it's time
to study amharic ge'ez. n'ko and tifinagh blew my mind recently,
and there is nsibidi. So I almost completely forgot of the
magnificence of ge'ez.
And I see, that it's not the first т (which is actually θ) but the
second т, the t т.
I like it that the ч after that т is basically the т with a hat.
And I only went hunting and immediately found that softened form
джэ in the final line. It is reflecting the дэ from the first row.
Further upwards, ш[ʃ] is the c[s] with a hat.
не is a нэ with a hat, so the hat is the softener.
хэ is softened кэ
some other хэ is that θ with a chimney, and after or rather under
that θэ is some чэ no other alphabet has, unless it is j (but then
where should Ч be if not next to h, and θ is just in that group
found not in every alphabet, it looks a basis of this group in
жэ looks like modified зэ (or a wide form of it, ዠ which kind of
reminds Ж a little, but i dunno. I needed this unicode set to find
And there is some other representation, the halaham is in use
today, with ya and wa added to the 7-vowel canon. And I yet have
to research it, but I need to look into all the lines above
because what a set coming from based ge'ez to even more based
runes and before them it is ogham, the glorious system I suspect
to be a very important piece of this mosaic.
And I see there the based cree. And the cherokee next to it make
me question how based is cherokee. MAybe it's the bridge between
european systems and the american ones. America had writing
literacy, not less than africa. ANd only europeans' imperialism
makes us believe otherwise. All the nations had writing systems
and only the preservation of australean megalyths from
archaeologists may make us think that maori didn't have writing
systems. MAybe maori didn't. MAybe the legendary tribe before them
did. Maybe the keys to those polynesian writings is hidden under
And I see some new writing system, only that it is new only for
me, even though it's supposed to be relatively new, I suspect it
to be as old as cree, and I suspect the white devils in a
conspiracy against the whites. Why would they strive to create the
savages their own writing system? That would go against the point
of assimilation. It looks more like they couldn't hide the
existence of that literacy, but they could corrupt the history of
it, since those savages probably didn't have such important
science as history, suddenly it is an important science.
Either way, the halaham ge'ez:
It's funny that they have bt sequence at about the same distance
futhark has, which reminds me this:
only here they have t before b. And this is probably a
But those are the same T and the same B which was the first
consonant in the alphabetic spyral, and t was that very classic
final consonant. of hebrew and archaic latin and phoenician and
bornholm alphabet if we consider ᚢ not v, but u (even though axial
structure tells otherwise)
And because that በ looks like ᚢ so much, it could be the other
form of the same letter on another level the same way ge'ez goes
in a spyral too. Either way, that is how I recall the በ.
Hail me, I did it in vol.5
ጊ ዳ ሄ ው
ዞ — а бу ги да хе
በ ጉ ዲ ሃ
ዌ ዝ ዦ — бэ гу ди ха
ве зы жо
ገ ዱ ሂ ዋ
ዜ ዥ ሖ — гэ ду хи ва зе жы хо
ደ ሁ ዊ
ዛ ዤ ሕ ጦ — дэ ху ви за же хы то
ዚ ዣ ሔ ጥ ጮ — хэ ву зи жа хе ты чо
ወ ዙ ዢ ሓ ጤ ጭ ዮ — вэ
зу жи ха те чы йо
ዘ ዡ ሒ ጣ ጬ ይ ኮ — зэ жу
хи та че йы ко
ዠ ሑ ጢ ጫ ዬ ክ ኾ — жэ ху
ти ча йе кы хо
ሐ ጡ ጪ ያ ኬ ኽ ሎ — хэ ту
чи йа ке хы ло
ጠ ጩ ዪ ካ ኼ ል ሞ — тэ чу йи ка хе лы мо
ጨ ዩ ኪ ኻ ሌ ም ኖ — чэ йу ки ха ле мы
የ ኩ ኺ ላ ሜ ን ኞ — йэ
ку хи ля ме ны нё
ከ ኹ ሊ ማ ኔ ኝ ሶ — кэ ху
ли ма не ны со
ኸ ሉ ሚ ና ኜ ስ ሾ — хэ лю ми на не сы шо
ለ ሙ ኒ ኛ ሴ ሽ ዖ — лэ му
ни ня се шы ъо
መ ኑ ኚ ሳ ሼ ዕ ፎ —
мэ ну ни са ше ъы фо
ነ ኙ ሲ ሻ ዔ ፍ ጾ — нэ ню си ша ъэ фы
ኘ ሱ ሺ ዓ ፌ ጽ ቆ — не су ши ъа фе
ሰ ሹ ዒ ፋ
ጼ ቅ ሮ — сэ шу ъи фа це кы ро
ሸ ዑ ፊ
ጻ ቄ ር ሦ — шэ ъу фи ца ке ры со
ጺ ቃ ሬ ሥ ቶ — э фу ци ка ре сы то
ፈ ጹ ቂ ራ ሤ ት ቾ — фэ цу ки ра се ты чо
ጸ ቁ ሪ ሣ ቴ ች ኆ — цэ ку
ри са те чы хо
ቀ ሩ ሢ ታ ቼ ኅ ጶ — кэ ру си та че хы по
ረ ሡ ቲ ቻ ኄ ጵ ፆ — рэ су ти ча хе пы
ሠ ቱ ቺ ኃ ጴ ፅ ፖ —
сэ ту чи ха пе цы по
ተ ቹ ኂ ጳ
ፄ ፕ ጆ — тэ чу хи па
це пы джо
ቸ ኁ ጲ
ፃ ፔ ጅ ኦ —
чэ ху пи
ца пе джы ъо
ፂ ፓ ጄ እ
ቦ — хэ
пу ци па
дже ъы бо
ጰ ፁ ፒ
ጃ ኤ ብ
ጎ — пэ цу пи джа ъэ бы го
ፀ ፑ ጂ ኣ
ቤ ግ ዶ — цэ пу джи ъа
бе гы до
ፐ ጁ ኢ
ባ ጌ ድ ሆ —
пэ джу ъи
ба ге ды хо
ጀ ኡ ቢ
ጋ ዴ ህ ዎ —
джэ ъу би
га де хы во
And the way I jump from one thing to the other, I return to those
writen write writing systems I singled out:
if this system is organic, it should relate to cree syllabics,
let's compare one to the other:
e i o
ᐁ ᐃ ᐅ
ᐯ ᐱ ᐳ
ᑌ ᑎ ᑐ
ᑫ ᑭ ᑯ
ᒉ ᒋ ᒍ
ᒣ ᒥ ᒧ
ᓄ (the carrier material challenges the
correctness of this line)
ᓭ ᓯ ᓱ
ᔦ ᔨ ᔪ
of cree I know and now let's look at the carrier:
o ə ⟨u⟩
ᐁ ᐃ ᐅ
(here I rearranged the vowels to keep the same direction order as
ᗨ ᗩ ᗪ (these
forms are different from cree's ᐸᐯᐱᐳ, but the directions remain)
ᑐ (this forms are exactly the same as in cree,
so I think vowels are arbitrary)
ᗯ ᗰ ᗱ (this
set tells me that cree is the basis, see the whole carrier set
below to see)
ᙛ ᙜ ᙝ (this
line is rather different, but the direction remains)
ᘈ ᘉ ᘊ
(these forms are also different, and I wonder why it looks so much
ᘂ ᘃ ᘄ
(here it looks like half a m, which make carrier's related to
ᙎ ᙏ ᙐ
(another letter looking like k and m, which is interesting,
because of Ϻ [s])
ᘎ ᘏ ᘐ
(this one is easy to compare to t or whatever you like)
the carrier k seems to be double t, and that may tell us that that
is what it was in cree, just drawn differently
The whole carrier set I was taking those signs from is in the
clickable image above.
So you see, that the vowels I omitted are all variants of what
they transliterated as ə⟨u⟩ but naturally in comparison to other
vowels, it's clear that those other variants transliterated as e
and i are more based. it's i. and I expect ə⟨u⟩ to be closer to ы,
but who knows, let's leave it to the americans themselves.
ʔ ⟨'⟩ ᐧ
p ⟨b⟩ ᗮ
x ⟨kh⟩ ᐥ
ɣ ⟨gh⟩ ᐦ
t ⟨d⟩ ᐪ
k ⟨g⟩ ᐟ
kʰ ⟨k⟩ ᐠ
ɬ ⟨lh⟩ ᒡ
ʃ ⟨sh⟩ ᙚ
ts ⟨dz⟩ ᐪz
tsʰ ⟨ts⟩ ᐪs
f ᶣᐁ ᶣᐃ
ᶣᐅ ᶣᐈ ᶣᐉ
pʼ ⟨p⟩ ᗮᗨ ᗮᗩ
ᗮᗪ ᗮᗫ ᗮᗬ
r rᐁ rᐃ
rᐅ rᐈ rᐉ
v ᘁᗨ ᘁᗩ
ᘁᗪ ᘁᗫ ᘁᗬ
ʒ ⟨zh⟩ ᙇᙔ ᙇᙕ
ᙇᙖ ᙇᙗ ᙇᙘ
The rotation they use I saw in the ancient greek musical notation.
I leave the final five rows because they're fucked-up: the final
three are definite european influence, and that is exactly how
they'd invent it, the way they know it. And probably this addition
allowed them to claim themselves the inventors of whole the thing
the way they invented writing systems based on russian or latin
alphabets, just adding few signs to preexisting ones. The same may
go for final forms of h and t and z and s.
And now for something completely different. So got high, rolled my
sleeves and dive into Cherokee writing system:
The usual alphabetical order
for Cherokee runs across the rows of the syllabary chart from
left to right, top to bottom—this is the one used in the Unicode
Original Cherokee syllabary order, with the now obsolete letter
Ᏽ in red:
First approach to digging it is looking at the signs I already
Ꭰ (a), Ꭱ (e), Ꭲ (i), Ꭵ (v),
Ꭶ (ga) Ꭹ (gi), Ꭺ (go), Ꭻ (gu), Ꭼ
Ꭾ (he), Ꭿ (hi), Ꮀ (ho), Ꮁ (hu), Ꮂ (hv),
Ꮃ (la), Ꮄ (le), Ꮅ (li), Ꮆ (lo), Ꮇ (lu)
(I keep Ꮄ
because it reminds coursive form of ל)
(it's hard to tell where to draw the line,
because Ꮅ reminds P and Ꮆ reminds G, but they're different)
Ꮋ (mi) Ꮍ (mu), and I immediately have a problem..
Should I only take latin majuscule or all signs I know? Because
these sighns are believed to be taken out of typewriters cast for
esoteric scripts, but maybe some were manufactured individually, I
don't know the history well enough to tell. Either way, This first
approach probably was fancied by the others, either way it doesn't
seem to return much.
Ꮎ (na) Ꮐ (nah), Ꮑ (ne), Ꮒ
(ni), Ꮓ (no) and from now on
I don't delete signs, I paint them gray
Ꮖ (qua), Ꮗ (que), Ꮘ (qui), Ꮙ (quo), Ꮚ
(quu), Ꮛ (quv),
Ꮜ (sa), Ꮝ
(s), Ꮞ (se), Ꮟ (si), Ꮠ (so), Ꮡ
(su), Ꮢ (sv),
(ᗨ is pu in carrier syllabics)
Ꮣ (da), Ꮤ (ta), Ꮥ (de), Ꮦ (te), Ꮧ (di), Ꮨ (ti), Ꮩ (do), Ꮪ
(du), Ꮫ (dv), (ᑲ is ka and ᒐ is cha in cree)
Ꮬ (dla), Ꮭ (tla), Ꮮ (tle), Ꮯ (tli), Ꮰ (tlo), Ꮱ (tlu), Ꮲ (tlv),
Ꮳ (tsa), Ꮴ
(tse), Ꮵ (tsi), Ꮶ (tso), Ꮷ
(tsu), Ꮸ (tsv),
Ꮹ (wa), Ꮺ (we), Ꮻ (wi), Ꮼ (wo), Ꮽ (wu), Ꮾ (wv),
Ꮿ (ya), Ᏸ (ye), Ᏹ (yi), Ᏺ (yo), Ᏻ (yu), Ᏼ
And to my surprise here I found those Ꮂ and Ꮘ but their
transliteration is, well.. hv and qui
and I did see Ꮂ as h and хуй, and I did see Ꮘ as queen or vaguine,
see the cardboard file folder (the plastic file folder for 100 or
so pages, and the second of the two ones so far, somewhere there
it is told, but I spoke about too, but not about genitals, I
Either way, this cherokee thing is hard to cut through. I will
return to it, but that's it for now.
to could be ты after all, du, thee:
Будьте здоровы. Будьте has те which means they, and it is plural
form of будь, as if it is будь и те,
but then where's ты in будь? Isn't that дь du? But that дь is ть
which is to. As in to be, and if to is thou, then it is an
imperative, and infinitive form can be an infinitive alright.
to could be ты after all, du, thee:
Здравствуйте has те which means they, and it
is plural form of здравствуй, as if
it is здравтвуй и те, but then isn't ву вы? because
здравие is the word.
It looks that proouns are not instead of nouns, but protonouns,
But then to has other uses, but some of them may be explained by
to being thee: to me, give it to me. But in other contexts it
doesn't work as well. But then other contexts could be made
uplater by the analogy to that form.
But that is quite a stretch of
imagination. Yet who knows, maybe statistic analysis will show
that to is followed by me more often than with any other word, and
though that could be saying something, it could be also not be,
because me is a simple word, one of the msiplest words there are,
so why would it be any other word. My best guess is that the word
I'm a bout to begin the vol.15 because this one lags asf..