Here I collect all the instances where T and V are the same

dna thing where T of dna is substituted with U of rna, but it's the most distant argument, it's mostly a curiosity, as if some secret biologists know this abcd thing and play with it in their nomenclature:
A meeting T and C meeting G reflect the k symmetry, only there C met S and G met O, where I am pleased by C~S and G~O, though they have some graphic similarities, make me question this whole k-symmetry as I call it. So those C and G are as if some form of collective K, and it's is weird that dna doesn't have labial letters, but RNA does. A C G U (because U used to be V, notice how nicely does A reflect V, which makes me question this whole thing even more, as if "did they figure it out themselves or did they indeed downloaded this information from some knoosphere?
Here was to be some awesome TV thing from vol.15 or 16 but instead I got distracted by that silly and most probably irrelevant genetics stuff. I will return to that tv example if it's relevant, so I will.


give
get
save
set
v and t being antonymous is not as weird, as g and s being antonyms too.
but then v and t meet as synonyms, what should I do about them?
I should copy it to TV folder. So here it is, greetings from vol.16



tvoyo vashe thy your thee/thou ye/you but then they say that
ye (present participle yeyn)
(obsolete) Address a single person by the use of the pronoun ye instead of thou.
y is a form of v (v is a form of u, they're the same letter in antiquity (atticity?_) and y is greek letter standing in greek where u is in latin, instead of v they have f, they don't have f in the second line anymore. and it's only naturweal, (well) that
well is we'll (people drank dirty water? колодец это от слова ключ, родник, People used to raise the walls to the well to make it a reservoir for pure water. And thus cities around the wells are probably built from the bottom up and the territories around it are some ancient cities laying that deep. (this is sent and worked on further in vol.16)

TV is how the alphabet ends.
It begins with G-d or Б-г
and ends with tv of tvarr, zverr, z is also how it ends, 666 of uvw is how it ends, ъыь,
(and it goes on in vol.16)

No [nou] No[no] Nee [nei] Не [ne] Нет [net]

From Middle English forgon (“to go by, pass up”), from Old English forgān (“to go away, forgo”); equivalent to for- +‎ go.


Are they Asgard Midgard uTgard?
Is this disagreement about which letter is the final one caused this chapter to appear?




commandment ~ comendment ~ comend ~ mend ~ mind ~ m'ing (maying, making, thus ijkl, the same suffix in all the form V~W~N~й~j~y~ч (в руссокм кажется два равнозначных суффикса фамильных: ов и ин (оба работают как суффикс родительного падежа у разных слов, и что интересно, in ~ во (ко украинский вариант to~в)



in = во
at ~ во T~V? to in. to me in me to the book in the book to the supermarket в магазин
to = до
in = n = в (in = no. ni is also a dialectal form of no, slavic no is ni. their no is but, bu is no in chinese)




ты и те. те множестенное число от tu? u=y=ы. I noticed before taht s reminds ij
but why ы is in ты if it's singular? it's also in вы. was U[w] singular form of вы? t~v? ты~вы is the epicicle(?) of it. epicentre it is.
Ты (Thee) probably being a singular form of They and U being a singular form of We, are they the very T and B? But correctly will be to say B and T, as they go in alphabets (but not in runes) and as they are in pronouns: We is first pronoun, They is the last.



witches учат witch, not teach.. T as musculine substitute for feminine V? T instead of F?
are those two strokes tits? then ᚠ are scematic tits, and ᚴ is schematic penis, and that is how they're feminine and musculine, whether it caused this connotated or was caused by it.



from vol.20:
ly is "some suffix? ^ tje Λ the Λ
tje is dutch way to palatalize, it's my subconsciousness tells me that it's чьё, чё, что, that, the~whe? t~v? again? or is it the same)



from vol.23:
fuck can be read as писькъ in russian, and such wicked cognatism told me that F is П (is u J? is ..if f is п, then u is c!? v~t thing? let's copy paste it there, but first it (ᚡ~π  ᚴ~τ) told me of greek stav: π τ
(ᚡ~π  ᚴ~τ)  tells that ᚦ~ᚴ~ᛚ~ᛏ(because ᛏ is ᛐ)
all linguals are the same?
originally, mythologically. What if the fairy-tales are mnemonic tools to remeber some important things. Like what if three goddeses are three abstract concepts, existing only in some parallel realm, the realm of our consciousness, of course, psychic is of psyche, so I saw suych trinity when I thought of the simplest things in music: four strings of violin allow to play two strings at once, and depending on whether you work in one direction or the other, you get descending or ascending accords. Today they call only three strings as an accord, but probably that additional string here relates to the two additional strings they added to Apollo's



T & V are similar in the way that both are two tallies.
And what if letters are combinations of three sticks? is it why many runes look alike? because there are not too many combinations.
But if those tallies are identical to the gestures, then T is time out, stop, deadend; while X is no.
What is V? развилка. Т.е. оба стоп, но с разными смыслами. последняя строка строка остановок?


hebrew, but иврит


wear~tear (w is more continuous, less violent, more continuous than the momentary action of the tear, probably followint the wear, but not necessary, and I would grasp to it if W did follow T in the alphabet. Or does it say it does? like EFГ order is in reverse, thus female as being labial fits it)
(износы и разрывы (стёртое и разорванное))
тёрто(стёрто) is for T, and R of разрыв stands before ST оf стёрто
стар? I am not rigorous enough, too humanitarian so to ssay.
But okay, it's my contribution to this collection for today.
I'm yet to figure out what this collection is all about.
I first fill it up a little, and maybe then I watch it in its complexity.


T and Y may remind each other: ..and I didn't find that image in unicode, I could only find ♈, and it is interesting how that old greek form of Υ, third in the image, reminds both T and V




 Libra
Litera


маляткиUA ~ малявкиRU



𐲦 is hungarian T


Claudius was a scientist, he was the last roman who knew etruscan, he was a legit linguist in my eyes. Was he the first to seaparate U from V with his attempt of introducing Ⅎ, the upside down F? t?
(it is a nonsense notion, and I collect them here, to see if they represent some deeper line, or if they indicate the percentage of nonsense, and maybe some new cathegory of research appears, which I shall explore as objects, when they're filled. I should create such pairs every time I meet something of the kind, not when I "saw it before!" or maybe not, sometimes my journeys bring pure nonsense, why catalogue it if it doesn't persist.)


t in heat typoed up front. as for temperature, but isn't temp time? isn't termperature rotation of time? But no, they typo erm is of warm. termы are roman saunas. term~тёпл(warm (and that's why it's here))
















.