Here I collect all the instances where T and V are the same
dna thing where T of dna is substituted with U of rna, but it's
the most distant argument, it's mostly a curiosity, as if some
secret biologists know this abcd thing and play with it in their
A meeting T and C meeting G reflect the k symmetry, only there C
met S and G met O, where I am pleased by C~S and G~O, though they
have some graphic similarities, make me question this whole
k-symmetry as I call it. So those C and G are as if some form of
collective K, and it's is weird that dna doesn't have labial
letters, but RNA does. A C G U (because U used to be V, notice how
nicely does A reflect V, which makes me question this whole thing
even more, as if "did they figure it out themselves or did they
indeed downloaded this information from some k
Here was to be some awesome TV thing from
vol.15 or 16 but instead I got distracted by that silly and most
probably irrelevant genetics stuff. I will return to that tv
example if it's relevant, so I will.
v and t being antonymous is not as weird, as g and s being
but then v and t meet as synonyms, what should I do about them?
I should copy it to TV folder. So here it
is, greetings from vol.16
tvoyo vashe thy your thee/thou ye/you but then they say that
ye (present participle yeyn)
(obsolete) Address a single person by the use of the pronoun ye
instead of thou.
y is a form of v (v is a form of u, they're the same letter in
antiquity (atticity?_) and y is greek letter standing in greek
where u is in latin, instead of v they have f, they don't have f
in the second line anymore. and it's only naturwe
well is we'll (people drank dirty water?
колодец это от слова ключ, родник, People used to raise the
walls to the well to make it a reservoir for pure water. And
thus cities around the wells are probably built from the bottom
up and the territories around it are some ancient cities laying
that deep. (this is sent and worked on further in vol.16)
TV is how the alphabet ends.
It begins with G-d or Б-г
and ends with tv of tvarr, zverr, z is also how it ends, 666 of
uvw is how it ends, ъыь,
(and it goes on in vol.16)
Nee [nei] Не [ne] Нет [ne
From Middle English forgon (“to go by, pass up”),
from Old English forgān (“to go away, forgo”); equivalent to
for- + go.
Are they Asgard Midgard uTgard?
Is this disagreement about which letter is the final one caused
this chapter to appear?
commandment ~ comendment ~ comend ~ mend ~ mind ~ m'ing (maying,
making, thus ijkl, the same suffix in all the form V~W~N~й~j~y~ч
(в руссокм кажется два равнозначных суффикса фамильных: ов и ин
(оба работают как суффикс родительного падежа у разных слов, и что
интересно, in ~ во (ко украинский вариант to~в)
in = во
at ~ во T~V? to in. to me in me to the book in the book to the
supermarket в магазин
to = до
in = n = в (in = no. ni is also a dialectal form of no, slavic no
is ni. their no is but, bu is no in chinese)
ты и те. те множестенное число от tu? u=y=ы. I noticed before taht
s reminds ij
but why ы is in ты if it's singular? it's also in вы. was U[w]
singular form of вы? t~v? ты~вы is the epicicle(?) of it.
epicentre it is.
witches учат witch, not teach.. T as musculine substitute for
feminine V? T instead of F?
are those two strokes tits? then ᚠ are scematic tits, and ᚴ is
schematic penis, and that is how they're feminine and musculine,
whether it caused this connotated or was caused by it.
ly is "some suffix? ^ tje Λ
tje is dutch way to palatalize, it's my subconsciousness tells me
that it's чьё, чё, что, that, the~whe? t~v? again? or is it the
fuck can be read as писькъ in russian, and such wicked cognatism
told me that F is П (is u J? is ..if f is п, then u is c!? v~t
thing? let's copy paste it there, but first it (ᚡ~π ᚴ~τ)
told me of greek stav: π τ
(ᚡ~π ᚴ~τ) tells that ᚦ~ᚴ~ᛚ~ᛏ(because ᛏ is ᛐ)
all linguals are the same?
originally, mythologically. What if the fairy-tales are mnemonic
tools to remeber some important things. Like what if three
goddeses are three abstract concepts, existing only in some
parallel realm, the realm of our consciousness, of course, psychic
is of psyche, so I saw suych trinity when I thought of the
simplest things in music: four strings of violin allow to play two
strings at once, and depending on whether you work in one
direction or the other, you get descending or ascending accords.
Today they call only three strings as an accord, but probably that
additional string here relates to the two additional strings they
added to Apollo's
T & V are similar in the way that both are two tallies.
And what if letters are combinations of three sticks? is it why
many runes look alike? because there are not too many
But if those tallies are identical to the gestures, then T is time
out, stop, deadend; while X is no.
What is V? развилка. Т.е. оба стоп, но с разными смыслами.
последняя строка строка остановок?
hebrew, but иврит
wear~tear (w is more continuous, less violent, more continuous than the momentary action of
the tear, probably followint the wear, but not necessary, and I
would grasp to it if W did follow T in the alphabet. Or does it
say it does? like EFГ order is in reverse,
as being labial fits it)
(износы и разрывы (стёртое и разорванное))
тёрто(стёрто) is for T, and R of разрыв stands before ST оf
стар? I am not rigorous enough, too humanitarian so to ssay.
But okay, it's my contribution to this collection for today.
I'm yet to figure out what this collection is all about.
I first fill it up a little, and maybe then I watch it in its