Here, I decided to write in somewhat poetic metre, but then I get carried away all the time, I told me not to bother a decade ago or too:

The alphabet is ABC
the name's its structure:
vowels, labials and linguals (for that C's K and S and Ts and Ч)

The alphabet is ABC
And abc is a b c and d
and follows very similar to this:
e under a, both made with voice,
f ander b, for lips them bring,
and g and h are c and d
(h is softer c the k,
g as ʒ is softer d,
f is softer than b, be it b or v.
and then o p q and t
are like voiceless a b c d
(c was voiced in ancient rome)
or isn't s a form of c?
all q and r and s and t
are under c and d:
if c is g, and g is ʒ,
then s is ʃ, as hebrew shows.
but then what is it doing in this line?
o p and t are definitely voiceless a b d
if c is g, then q should take this place.
But there's no q in greek in russian,
so r or s? I'd say as to place ʃ below it:
in russian after t is ufhc̆čs̆š,
it's like hands down, it's abccccc
c is staveless d, like g and d
are the same g and g is in latin,
being d in the russian cursive.
And h a g are thus also the same?
Was h voiced, and thus a form of g?
is upside down ꙋ and with one more loop
was there before there, as I somewhere saw?
hitler is gitler, so h and g are c on lower level
not g the c and d, but h for c and ʒ as softer d,
and f used to be voiced, for it's in hebrew.
the opposites of abgd and efhz
(the way we see in greek, for f is θ,
because in russian θ the ѳ is f.
Yes, russian is probably more ancient,
than we're told it to be, for armenian
is not made up from scratch,
though who knows that.

It's neither poetry nor prose, bad poetry they'd say, I didn't edit it, would I do betters, will it do?

When we speak poetry
Is it not better than
we speak like everybody
speak of nothing?
What was that line
It's neither rhymed
nor what,
nor full of meaning
either neigh and neither
(that line for musical whatever there is)
(I shouldn't rhyme or rhythm, I should deliver what makes more sense than play of wriming (isn't it russian т the т?)


чирик ~ чижик (ж[ʒ] - китайское прочтение символа R и не во всех, конечно, диалектах, скорей всего в мандаринском, ведь его русским в первую очередь преподают)



was ~ saw (было ~ видел) it can be used as a mellow mnemonic tool
(I collect such pairs in my freaks.html, because it is a chrestomatic quackery in russian linguistics, it is one of the ideas of Lukashevich, who is considered to be a cuckoo)
I also added it to my list of cognates, because of it being such a good mnemonic tool.


Предложил Гайдуку быть моим научным руководителем (он филолог, и ему не надо объяснять значение травы в мыслительных процессах.


A B C D
O P Q T
O P Q S T or O P K S T probably was the previous state of this line,
R was probably moved to this line to creat the L ~ R symmetry in the axial symmetry.

And here we find the axial structure useful: it appeared to explain the position of Y, but it also can explain the position of R. I wish it could explain the position of M. Let's see if it does..


And I surely didn't expect to see Merlin in the I-line
Was Imnl of the Immanuel placed there by christians instead of Merlin? Is Merlin a legendary wizard of the brits, because he was the guy, who invented the "latin" alphabet? Out of some syllabary, my guess is from some paleohispanic syllabary, or rather from some syllabary, which wasn't excavated yet.
So I predict, that some syllabary, very similar to what we know as latin alphabet can appear, and Creco-Iberian alphabet reminds the syllabaries very much. So the same thing should exist for latin alphabet, for if some part of europe was literate, the others inevitably was as well, purely for geographic reasons.

Or, rather it was like this:

(it would be this way by the reason of how messed-up is the U-line, and for hebrew and some archaic alphabets end around T, and because the following few lines:
And if P-line reflects B-line (it does) then M line but be the voiced part of the F-line
Then I can see M as W, R as voiced H, thus what is G doing there? Doubling the C. And were H and such uvular R (uvular R as voiced H, could you imagine it? I never had such hypothesis)

and how would the axial symmetry of such tree of life look?:




What would be the voiceless form of N? probably, nothing, for the way there are more voiceless plosives than voiced plosives, the same way there are more voiced fricatives, than voiceless fricatives.
E F H could be the e-line's A B C
so..
A B G
E  F  H
I  M R
O P  K
could be the 12, but then if it was not G, but D, it would ended with less выебонs, but then what would stand instead of H and R?
A B D
E  F  S
I  W Z
O P  T
well, the W and Z in the I line is uncanny.
A B D
E Θ Σ(σ/ς)
I W N(ν)
O П T
See, what I'm doing here? I lay out my thought process. I wished others did it, now I had to show them how to do it.


So could the mistake in Hyginus be in the word septem (or our understanding of it? could it be sextem?) could ABHITY be all the letters there were? ABHTIY is the sequence in the books, and in the third a cross-sign placed between B and H, as if there's where the O (or whatever the letter) would be.
ABOHTIY? Nah, let's place the 12 with those six..
A B D
H 𐌚  S
 I М Λ
Y П Т
By the principle of labials-doubles have I reconstructed the 12 out of 6,
And a piece about it should be on the next edition. I should start listing those.
(the exploration of the account given in Hyginus actually accurate. if there was O, it would be



B D
P Q

b  d
p  q


kust is coast in dutch.
kunst is arts, so arts are what is beyond some border of reality.

I worked at trying to turn my thing into an academic paper, but I feel like that is some magic to kill the spirits, christians organized academia in that manner for their own retarded reason.

lk
cd
are those four made of the two like l lc c cl?



an unexpected source to decypher ogham:
КИПАРИС, дерево сие принимается за знак смерти, печали и сожаления; ибо древние
народы саживали ево около могил, и нашивали при погребении, чего ради стихотворцы
<Вергилий, Овидий и др. — Е.Ш.> дали ему имя Arbor Feralis, дерево печальное. Борель
Король Цельтов когда лишился своей до-[с. 53:]чери Кипариссы, то приказал посадить на
гробнице ее оное дерево, от чево и назвалось оно кипарисом.
Король Цельтов is what made me think of Celts and their Oghm,
but then I couldn't find these references anywhere, but then I found this:
В Ирландии колдуньи используют для помела палку из бузины, а не из ясеня. Несмотря на то, что цветки и кора бузины славятся лечебными свойствами, считается, что запах бузины вызывает болезни и смерть.
Бузина приносит столько несчастий, что Спенсер сравнивает ее с траурным кипарисом, а Т. Скот пишет в «Philomythie» (1616):
"13 и последняя согласная буква древнего Огама" they said. If that is true, I'd think that BLN is how it was, and after that two aicme by 5 letters would go, but I think I saw 13-letter ogham somewhere..
Somebody is working on putting paleohispanics into unicode,


And it gave me the vision of o being double a
Yet, I was looking for labials being double shapes of the linguals, and I only saw it in few examples, using the paleohispanic tables I used in the booklet, I can only see Be being double Ge,

but de can be seen as double be, so some bi-consonant syllabary has to be looked for.
also da can be seen as double ba, but other lines play this game less and less, until in the U line I can see 𓊪-like shape for bu, which is  very similar to p, as 𓊪 is usually transliterated.
And there's also a 𓏚-like symbol for du, which is not transliterated or translated in my sources, but 𓏙 stands for ḏj, which could be the double 𓏚, and thus 𓏚 could be d for this reason. Wha I can see here is a semi-syllabary reminding me egyptian hieroglyphs more than any other alphabet. Greeks also have Δ, but not a 𓊪-like shape. And also Λ of those paleohispaniards is very greek-like, but at this point I'm rather certain, that it is greeks who were influenced by paleohispaniards, be them pelasgians or some other legendary nation mysterious to historians.

literally the spannish greek, texts in this script were found in Spain, but in Greece, according to what I know.
The B is the same as in norsk runes (ᛒ), so is S (ᛊ), so is I (ᛁ) and those are in three distinct groups, thus could be the three mothers. But then that is greco-iberian I'm speaking of.
but ᛁ-like shape is A in the syllabary, let's post it again
The guy who works on putting it into unicode also compares them to phoenician (probably to raise his or her chances) and the comparison is fair, but in my estimation it only tells that phoenicians took it from paleo-hispaniards, because syllabary is more archaic, used before we forgot what each syllable in the words meant. Here's the comparison:

Some of the comparisons are rather shaky: phoenician b doesn't resemble the syllable bi, which reminds pi the archaic П way more. But the most of the letters indeed have some resemblance, but what are the M-shapes, they're not what my table tells. Let's see how does he transliterates the M's:
so he puts L as if it's Г, then he recognizes h as e (but here he's correct)
but what does he compare to z? O!!!
ffs! that is quite a pull, so beware of that table: the latin letters only correspond to the phoenician line and usually have nothing to do with the paleohispanic counterparts.
But some comparisons are legit, Ta for T, very similar R's

Enough of this obscure subject for today. The link from paleo-hispanic to egyptian, stronger than in phoenician or greek, may also indicate that the path of further research is showing: to demonstrate in what relations are ancient letters of the european nations prior to roman domination, and to demonstrate which egyptian shapes correlate with the others. Egypt is known as a centre of knowledge, so suspecting them to be a major influence through millenia is a natural assumption. May further observations confirm or reject this hypothesis. It will take me some time unentangling this part of the story.



𓏙 is also told to stand for dl, which is fascinating, since Δ is d, and Λ is l, greek they're. Was it a joke, or do greek shapes form egyptian forms? They're the same forms. I told you, that single glyphs predate the alphabets which consist of them by millenia, and here's the obvious example: both Δ and Λ are the simplest form, which can be found in some neolythic graphic, one of those symbols singled out by Genevieve von Petzinger in her book called "The First Signs: Unlocking the Mysteries of the World's Oldest Symbols" and she calls them triangle and open angle.



Some reports that armenian alphabet existed before Mashtots:
Emperor Alexander Severus (reigned 208-235 CE), mentions that the Armenians are amongst those nations who have their own distinct alphabet.


I in voir is ا, and o is u, as both are ו, but then it raises the question:
Is AEIOU it EIA(OU or УЮ? ow and you, o~u and ju? isn't U Υ?)
(for a is ej, e is ji, i is aj (hands down, o and u are o and u, for they are ow(oh? oj? oi?) and ju))
(or jo and ju, but is o ö and what am I even doing here?)



Ɔ W C D
E Ж З
Ɔ M C  (here I speak of C being in the C position in latin and in the S position in russian)
 ᛆ  W ᚴ
Е Ж З
У M ᚿ
I am definitely a master to find misteries, similarities, build symmetries was the word,

is every symmetry a mystery? симетри и мистери являются фонетическими палиндромами (сокрытыми полиндромами)
simmetry ~ similarity (both words are with something, but one is with metrey and the other is of some ilarity or larity.. is it clarity?

so many runic shapes in the previous attempt to line letters around Ж (but Ж should be whether 6 or 3, not 5) that  I decided to play around with the runic sequences directly:

ᛆᛒᚦᛂ(ᚽ)ᚠᚵᚼ(not ᛡ)ᛁᚴᛚᛘ(even though it looks like ᛉ)ᚿᚮᚱᛦ(if R, or ᛣ if Q)ᛋᛏᚢ



B T × A E I O U = A E I O U BA BE BI BO BU TA TE TI TO TU these are 15, which is a legendary number in this account.  The alphabet of Carmenta had 15 letters.
And if we add the inversions of those syllables, we'll get 25 letters, which is very close to 24 to 26 of the latin alphabet. I only consider irish-italian and english-german-french, and who knows if it is some catholics vs protestants difference (catholic Ireland and Italy don't have JK placed into the body of the alphabet, thus M (for Mary) is closer to the I. is L I? l looks just like I, almost like I, it can't be a coincidence, especially in the context of ll being short I, what a weird story, what had happened here? How can Λ be И?

The way italians and irish just do without J and K:

Ирландия, Испания, Италия all start with I and the second letters are R S T, which is rather alphabetic, just in the order those nations come for shipmen who sail from the Great Britain?
Q for queenland? P for Prussia? O for what?

Some of the ideas are pretty off, but then only by trying them all on can we tell, so I shouldn't sweat it.


rationalizing a typo:
wear ~ weak? You're weaker, if you carry somebody, than if you weren't.


I aM all
I aM aΛ
Я всё? Но также "я мал", вроде как молитва от слова умолять~умалять(ся)
уMOREлять? to pour more?

уморять? умоляют "умри" когда ранили зверя? чтоб съесть его. прикармливали чтоб подло замочить? Тех зверей, кого замочить проще, те и вкуснее (откуда бы я знал другое, но кошку есть не хочу, только травоядных едим. но корейцы едят собак. в тех краях и не такое ядят))



I M L In My Life
I M N L - they placed N to say I'm not lying, when L began to interpreted not only as life, but also as lie (f is for facts? f is for всё?[фсё])
I have no idea if L was for life or love, I'm only guessing here, thus learning to write alphabetic poems.

abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
And BeCause
I aM Not Lying or I je keine lie, me – no.
minus ~ mini

What am I even doing here? and why. Should refocus.



whispering syllable pi feels as if it is ᛈ because corners of the lips silently click at palatalized p.
But then I can only guess that ᛈ is rotated π, thus ᚲ is 𐤂
and ᛆ is rotated into something ᛸ-like, which is..


Speaking of the inverted syllables, norsk unicode ends with ᛶ[eh], ᛷ[ac] and ᛸ[aesc]
and before them stands ᛵ[is] and that is the shape I saw in that pdf of paleohispanic I gave earlier in this volume (just ctrlF mirror and you see that glyph)
is is the name of the rune ᛁ, which is ba in paleohispanics, and compared to 𐤌
 in the both ᛵ-like and more ᛁ-like glyphs, you should click that mirror to figure out more, they're way more specialists on that question than I am, so I leave you at taht that.


право права


A      B      C      D
E      F        G      H

 I       J        K       L      M      N      
 
O      P       Q      R       S       T

U     V       W     X       Y       Z

That G is Ж (for it is in this line) I didn't think before this moment. See, digging into it again and again works, new views appear.
If ABC is the mold, then IMN is good if I the ʌɪ is some A, as in Amen.
Amen and Omen are like Alpha and Omega, good and bad meanings, ах и ох (от о лицо куксится, так что когда лицо скуксенное, получается не а, а о.

If R was at the K-position, then it was before L (unless I and L is the same letter)  so then it would say, that they invented it from right to left. Yet today if we lay it in line, R is in the right half of the alphabet if the alphabet is written left to right.



         A      B      C      D
 
E      F        G      H

         I       J        K       L      M      N      
 
        O      P       Q      R       S       T

U     V       W     X       Y       Z


                            A      B      C      D

                            E      F        G      H

 I       J        K       L      M      N      
 
                            O      P       Q      R       S       T

                       U     V       W     X       Y       Z


 A      B      C      D

         E      F        G      H

 I       J        K       L      M      N      
 
O      P       Q      R       S       T

U     V       W     X       Y       Z

I coloured Y green for J is green, I coloured them green for I separated tehm from the velars, but then Y is not that far from h the

These other alignments look like a broken tv, distorted picture of whatever the structure aligned by vowels is. Yet I had to ignore the semi-vowel status of Y

A      B      C      D

E      F        G      H

 I       J        K       L      M      N      
 
O      P       Q      R       S       T

U     V       W     X       Y       Z





c~t?
i~ċ?
e~n~t?
h looks more like s than s, and sometimes as g
k~h~f? how do they even read that thing! german orthography is a rabbithole per se
d is so much ט!
l~e is nothing new,
o~v is also something I saw before, and not just in ו, see the image below.
r is more s than s sometimes
s~p? like what s~b? what!?
sz is what I always considered to be ss, the ß, but it seems I was wrong: though it looks like ſs, it is called eszet for a reason. for it is ſʒ or something. But then here they say ß is ss, as I thought.
one of t's lacks the dash, and thus looks like l, I wonder if it is correct.
u~n̆ and even u~n sometimes
v is what a mess, it even looks more like h sometimes
w~b sometimes, now that is interesting
some crazy x,
y like ij is nice,
z like Σ is also supercool.
And here the v-like o

I love how they're basically two forms reflecting one the other and corresponding to their articulatory side: l~e for both are lingual, they as if д-fish-Yang and both o~v are labial, and look like Б-fish-Yin
Is it this much true that LOVE IS ALL YOU NEED

дббд (что-то будет, бабу? даму!) love is даму буду?
evolution is дббдбддб?(the last symbol is arbitrary, because in russian it's эволюция, дббдбдд?(now evolutio doesn't let me place я to e's, for it's reversed e on stave. Rreverse, thus ᚢ? ᚱreversed, thus ᛋ)
I think I went at some wild territory. She.

shemale makes female lingual, male. she is he? Herr, herGE, herEN, хер

her ~ husband (house-bend, house-bond)




more l'eau
[mo lö]
(молю(?))
but then of course normal people may say how is it one word is english and the other is french, but who knows, maybe some flemmish or what not can have lexics containing both those words? Either way, it's poetry and nothing else.


ready-made ~ 'ready made ~ already made


measure twice, cut once: in russian there's a mind fuck, the saying goes 7 раз отмерь, 1 отрежь.


boat~board~port


LE
OV        these four are so obvious, others I should pull to them: c to l (see Г/L dychotomy) and b to v, for В is russin V, for graphically it has the bubble at the right side. for l and e start with bubble, and are followed with a stick, while o and v and b for that matter start with stick, which then ends in bubble.

abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
a~d were added for they start with bubble, and are opposites of b and u.

as B/D, F/Г, M/Λ, П/Т, 𐌚/S, so U/I (is u~a? bus[bas]) a may look like ee (more e than e) but actually e looks like i without dot in cursive, and cursive is archaic.

A/Е? A as double E? æ?




A B C D
E F G H
I J K L M N
O P Q R S T
U V W X Y Z


should be made standard of tabling the alphabet.

A      B      C      D
E      F        G      H

 I       J        K       L      M      N      
 
O      P       Q      R       S       T

U     V       W     X       Y       Z



A      B      C      D
E      F        G      H

 I       J        K       L      M      N      
 
O      P       Q      R       S       T

U     V       W     X       Y       Z

is another standard. all three or more should be present on the board.

I LoVe MaMa

But I love mama and papa sounds like I love mama, end papa, which pretty much what in my case came to be.



Looking at it like this became obvious, that some name of god for example was in the I-line.
I M K L N or I M K N L? L N, there would be no need to overcomplicate it, besides L~Г, so that position is fit. K~L? Both are C in a way. Isn't n~Ŋ~D~G I wanted to say. C~D? as the opposite of B (is B and З connected? isn't it why we say в where it is written г in его. he used to be evo, the male gender of eve, thus the ultimate god, the eye.



в кенинге говно is мухин мёд (слишком graphic, and thus negleted obsolete (are ed and ete not cognatic morphemes? ed and te))
глупый glue-пей (пьющий клей)
умный умён Ом~он (М before N, and maybe that's how we kept this order, though other forms of N: K J L were before M, and here compare J and L to cursive נ (having no upper dash and the lower dash larger, as if it was L (naturally, reversed, because they write the other way around)) and the actual נ to כ, as if the two are invariants of the same letter)
УмНый? имеющий Ум. Ум-own (была лексика разведена меж языками дабы сокрыть смысл слов? это не является невообразимым, т.е. подобные реформы могли иметь место быть, тёмные века не сами по себе такие, там злая воля целенаправленная работу согласованную проводило на протяжении тысячелетия быть может даже (никто на самом деле не знает сколько мы здесь, это полнейший BLAME!))



позволить в каждом пространстве (будь то помещение или природа) видеонаблюдение, архивируемое, чтоб можно было воссоздать 3д-изображение любого события, таким образом позволив нам же в будущем заглянуть в каждый уголок (не закрытый желанием владельцев собственности) в каждую минуту записываемого времени. Фотография это начало, видео продолжило, архив мира - по направлению к машине времени, которая не запрещена необратимостью физических явлений, и следующим этапом будет запись состояния сознания во все эти моменты у всех, тогда можно будет и в персонажей вселяться, чтоб их мысли прочитать. И подобно тому как живопись предвосхитила фотографию, художественные произведения предвосхищают ту самую технологию, и в видео-формате, снятый ии по промтам и документальным кадрам, с воссозданием мыслей окружающих по воспоминаниям, чувства тревожным или весёлым фоном поверх всех остальных звуков из того человека (и помимо разного настроения, у каждого своя пара ушей, у каждого своя музыка)


Musical notes, letters and digits seem to be the same symbols: A is letter and musical note, a is letter and number, 1.
So are B and b, 2, so are C and c, 3, so are D and d, 4, so are E and e, 5, so are F and f, 6,
so are G and g, 7 (yet there's H, h 8 (check how silmilar H~Х and 8! compare it to gothic B and R, compare it to roman M numeral) yet if ABCDEF ~ IVXLCD.. are they? the first five can be pulled, but D obviously looks the other way from F.. digamma? well, what a pull is that?
And in such context, alphabet of 21 letters would be nice, and it's italian, no less:
but let's cut it right:

Maybe because it only hides the way it actually was?
A B  C D
E  F  G H
 I  L M N
O P  Q  R S T
U V  Z                    it's rather impressive as it is, I should memorize it, it's weird I still didn't.

This demands rectangular more than any of them.
and naturally I would make S = Z to get 20 instead of 21 (21 could be of some perfectionists, claiming to be 110% or something, so that could be memed to mean lucky, if 20 was the 100)
A B  C D
E  F  G H
 I  L M N
O P  Q  R
U V  S  T
Italian doesn't have the Y-bs, it goes almost directly in the structure, having only two reforms, so it seems: the M-reform and the S T reform. Or is hebrew correct? Was T the final letter? then they would have it 4×4, which is supercool, and maybe how I have to try rearranging the younger futhark.

ᚠᚢᚦᚬᚱᚴ᛬ᚼᚾᛁᛅᛋ᛬ᛏᛒᛘᛚᛦ
ᚠᚢᚦᚭᚱᚴ ᛬ᚽ ᚿᛁᛆ ᛌ ᛬ ᛐᛓ ᛙ ᛚ ᛧ
and here it comes to me᛬
ᚠᚢᚦᚭᚱᚲ ᛬ᚽ ᚿᛁᛆ ᛌ ᛬ ᛐᛓ ᛙ ᛚ ᛧ
symmetry of the centre, of the ᚿᛁᛆ, and similar ᛐ ᛓ ᛙ ᛚ in the other aet, makes me look for such symmetry in the first aet, but to no avail, unless ᚢ and ᚴ reflect each other that way (the other pairs were inside, outside, and this one is up and down. Were the six the initial group? Were there six notes? did composers conquer new notes (knew, key-new (or didn't know, if k is not, as one cardboard suggests) notes-nots-knots,forget-me-knots)
And then I look at ᚽ and ᛙ, but there is no reverse ᛙ for the third aet.
ᚠᚢᚦᚭᚱᚲ ᛬ᚽ ᚿᛁᛆ ᛌ ᛬ ᛐᛓ ᛙ ᛚ ᛧ and standard interpretation doesn't shine through such sequence

I thought that structure may allow me know alphabets better, so can I learn alphabets of all european countries? Of all countries who ever used them? No, only those who use them now, only that account cannot be messed-up by the scribe.


Let's build not in 360, but in 365¼ for 10²+11²+12² = 13²+14² = 365, а 8²+9²+10²+11² = 366
it could be important to acquire, 360 could be a simplification and as a result loss of magic.
if
A B  C D
E  F  G H
 I  L M N
O P  Q  R S T
U V  Z
was
A B  C D
E  F  G H
 I  L M N
O P  Q  R
U V  S  T,
it would also end with T, but would be better than hebrew in that it has five lines and only 20 letters.
if Z is צ, what are the others?
A B  C D ~ א ב כ ד
E  F  G H ~ ה ו ג ח
 I  L M N ~  י ל מ נ
O P  Q  R ~ ע פ ק ר
U V  S  T ~ ט ס ש ת (everything they have left, and a) for the first time have I noticed the graphic symilarity of ט and ס, b) ט does look like v, ס looks like o, which, as u and v are ו the F which is פ)
and ס stands right after n, so who knows maybe עס ~ Ѹ, and ס was transliterated from o to σ the way M is Ϻ.

ᚼ the ᛡ could be h~r~ʒ~ʃ as if the readings echo хорошо, as if it is Horus+Jah
Horus, in ancient Egyptian religion, a god in the form of a falcon whose right eye was the sun or morning star, representing power and quintessence, and whose left eye was the moon or evening star, representing healing.
search for Horus Cronos returned
Chronos, Hours, and Kairos
Crucified Horus
search for Horus Kronos returned
Kronos "Hammer of Horus" [serdjek art] : r/Warhammer40k
Naturally the similarity of the names intrigued poets before me, so what is reliable? Only structures built on similarities, while some of them are inevitably accidental, but further analysis, synthesis, whatever these words stand for, thinking on and on and on is the way onwards, and scientific inquiry bring fruit.
KHRONOS (Chronos) was the primordial god of time. In the Orphic cosmogony he emerged self-formed at the dawn of creation. Khronos was envisaged as an incorporeal god, serpentine in form, with three heads--that of a man, a bull, and a lion. He and his consort, the serpentine goddess Ananke (Inevitability), enveloped the primordial world-egg in their coils and split it apart to form the ordered universe of earth, sea and sky. After this act of creation the couple circled the cosmos driving the rotation of heaven and the eternal passage of time.
These data are like those coincidences can be accidental, a fluke flume of someone's imagination.
The figure of Khronos was essentially a cosmological double of the Titan Kronos (Cronus) ("Father Time"). The Orphics sometimes merged Khronos with the creator-god Phanes, and also equated him with the Titan Ophion. His equivalent in the Phoenician cosmogony was probably Olam (Eternal Time) whose name is written Oulomos in Greek transcripts.
Khronos was depicted in Greco-Roman mosaic as Aion (Aeon), eternity personified. He holds a wheel inscribed with the signs of the zodiac and Gaia (Mother Earth) usually reclines at his feet. The poet Nonnus describes Aion as an old man with long, white hair and a beard but mosaic-art presents a youthful figure.
LM order could be dictated by Olam.
And it is not some flume, it's more of a fluke, they (mirror) give sources I never heard of:
heritage ~ heresy?



Двоеперстие говорит "инь и ян" (ты и я)
троеперстие знает и их, про него не забывает
isn't there somebody you forgot to ask situation, go-ts and such.

government is go-to? goto? иди на? идина? идина раисия
В современной грамматике три времени и три рода и три числа (сегодня обычно используется два, и это может быть паттерном для остальных категорий (видимо, сначала их было две, а третья потребовала и в остальном троичности, гипотеза, но перед трёми идёт два, а сначала их вообще нет, потому что всё едино, и видимо первое представление о грамматике было двоичным, а потому форма букв принесла противопоставление инь-ян, но разве V Г L не
V L Г is rotating them clock-wise, and ВоЛГа is essentially ВЛаГа, WaTeR.
it it interesting because речь is related to река
is г in овраг tells ов+р(наоборот)? г как согни, не вертикально, а горизонтально (тоже двоичность)
and indeed it is enough to invert the order of letters by turning it 90° (be it counter-clockwise, when it's written horizontally, or clockwise if they're write/read right-to-left  (left~read? somebody left we read?)
we read what is left, what was leaved ливает пи́сать-писа́ть?) the same way vertical lines invert direction being rotated left or right.


L  R were D and V? П~ᚱ~R~Р~P~П? musical notation went in a ring, because what? Because numerals are. Are letters ringed too? does some 0 comes after 9?
0 is a, if it is ⴰ
ⵏ then n is surprisingly good one, but two? it is two, as japanese ni, but then that is not an easy pull.
ⵜ is t in tifinagh, which is both for two and three. ⵜ as T! I told you they're related, by the order of theirs I saw it.
ⵜ- • (t-) f
    she (third person feminine singular verb subject affix)
        ⵓⵔ ⵜⵙⵙⵏ
            ur tssn
            She doesn't know
    feminine prefix
    second person prefix
From Proto-Berber *t-, from Proto-Afroasiatic *-t. Doublet of -ⵜ (-t). 
IPA(key): /t-/
IPA(key): [θ-] (Ayt Ndhir)

ⵜ- -ⴷ • (t- -d) m or f
    thou (second person singular verb subject affix)
        ⵓⵔ ⵜⵙⵙⵏⴷ
            ur tssnd
            You don't know

ⵜ- -ⵎ • (t- -m) m
    ye (second person masculine plural verb subject affix)
        ⵓⵔ ⵜⵙⵙⵏⵎ
            ur tssnm
            You don't know

ⵜ- -ⵜ • (t- -t)
    feminine circumfix
    diminutive circumfix
    ⵜⴰⵡⵡⵓⵔⵜ (tawwurt)    ⵜⴰⴳⴳⵓⵔⵜ • (taggurt) f    door
tawwurt напоминает английское door и русское дверь настолько, что нет смысла разделять эти языки по разным ветвям. Многие берберы белые (видимо, как у индусов по кастам отличаются)
and because they have that t- grammatically explained, if the words are related, northerners borrowed this technology from africa, so in this sense coming out of africa is a good tradition.
    ⵜⴰⴳⴷⴰⵣⴰⵍⵜ • (tagdazalt) f    equivalence
as if its так сказал, но без циркумфикса агдазал, словно отгадал, что в equivalence может быть заложено for similar is familiar, or something of the kind. Yet, I'm not sure it's more than mnemonics.
    ⵜⴰⴷⴷⴰⵔⵜ • (taddart) f    house         Synonym: ⵜⵉⴳⵎⵎⵉ (tigmmi)
    ⵜⴰⵃⴱⵓⴱⵜ • (taḥbubt) f    unit of any fruit, grain, pimple, etc    berry
    ⵜ & ⴱ are so obviously the T and B, that I must compare these writing systems to see the most common, thus most ancient letters.
    ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ • (tamaziɣt) f (construct state ⵜⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ)    Tamazight language
     ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ • (tamaziɣt) f (construct state ⵜⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ, plural ⵜⵉⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵉⵏ, plural construct state ⵜⵉⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵉⵏ, masculine ⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖ)    free woman    female Amazigh, Berber
     ⵜⴰⵎⵓⵔⵜ • (tamurt) f (construct state ⵜⵎⵓⵔⵜ, plural ⵜⵉⵎⵓⵔⴰ, plural construct state ⵜⵎⵓⵔⴰ)
                    country, region, countryside, the ground
     ⵜⴰⵔⴱⴰⵜⵜ • (tarbatt) f    girl (child)    See also:     ⵍⵄⵉⵍ (lɛil)    ⴰⵔⴱⴰ (arba)    ⵉⵛⵉⵔⵔⵉ (icirri)
     ⵜⵉⴳⴷⵉⵜ • (tigdit) f (masculine ⵉⴳⴷⵉ)    bitch (female dog)
     ⵜⵉⵏⴰⵡⵜ • (tinawt) f    conference
     ⵜⵉⵏⴳⴻⵍⵉⵣⵜ • (tingelizt) f    English language    Englishwoman
                  why do they call language woman? because not английский, английская, бо мова)))
    ⵜⴰⴳⴷⵓⴷⴰ • (tagduda) f    republic
     ⵜ- -ⵏⵜ • (t- -nt) f    ye (second person feminine plural verb subject affix)
        ⵓⵔ ⵜⵙⵙⵏⵏⵜ
            ur tssnnt
            You don't know
     ⵜ- -ⴷ • (t- -d) m or f    thou (second person singular verb subject affix)
        ⵓⵔ ⵜⵙⵙⵏⴷ
            ur tssnd
            You don't know
     ⵜ- -ⵎ • (t- -m) m    ye (second person masculine plural verb subject affix)
        ⵓⵔ ⵜⵙⵙⵏⵎ
            ur tssnm
            You don't know
     ⴽⵏⵉⵏⵜⵉ • (kninti) f    ye (second person feminine plural independent pronoun)
     ⴽⵓⵏⵏⵉ • (kunni) m    ye (second person masculine plural independent pronoun)
     ⵏⵉⵀⵏⵜⵉ • (nihnti) f    they (third person feminine plural independent pronoun)
     ⵏⵉⵀⵏⵉ • (nihni) m    they (third person masculine plural independent pronoun)
        this one is interesting in that the letters could be easily mistaken for greek,
     -ⵏⵜ • (-nt) f    ye (second person feminine plural verb subject affix)
        ⵓⵔ ⵙⵙⵏⵏⵜ
            ur ssnnt
            They don't know
     ⵏⵜⵜⴰⵜ • (nttat) f    she (third person feminine singular independent pronoun)
        what rationale can I bring to this one? та!
     ⵏⵓⴽⴽⵏⵉ • (nukkni) m or f    we (first person plural inclusive independent pronoun)
         what rationale can I bring to this one? нас, мы?
     ⵜⴰⴳⵔⵙⵜ • (tagrst) f    cold season (equivalent to winter)
     ⴰⴳⴰⵎⴰⵏ • (agaman) (masculine plural ⵉⴳⴰⵎⴰⵏⵏ)    natural
Maybe my recognition of these languages related was a little hasty though.

ⴰ a, but looks like o
ⵓ u, but looks like aa, which is o, and I think it stands at the o's position, and indeed:
ⴰⴱⴲⴳⴴⴵⴶⴷⴸⴹⴺ
ⴻⴼⴽⴾⴿⵀⵁⵂⵃⵄⵅⵆⵇⵈ
ⵉⵊⵋⵌⵍⵎⵏⵐⵑⵒ
ⵓⵔⵕⵖⵗⵘⵙⵚⵛⵜⵝⵞⵟⵠⵡⵢⵣⵤⵥⵦⵧ⵰⵿ⵯtifingah
it definitely shows vowels at the all right places,


Russian word хорошо maybe exposes Horus, or Гор-Ра-Джа?


if
A B  C D
E  F  G H
 I  L M N
O P  Q  R S T
U V  Z
was
A B  C D
E  F  G H
 I  L M N
O P  Q  R
U V  S  T, then it wouldn't lay into the axial symmetry, into which modern italian lays into as if it was a rhombus on a platform keeping it upstraight:
A B  C D
E  F  G H
 I  L M N
O P  R S V (ars ~ artis, so probably S/T, any of the two would work, or rather I'm too early in it to say)
such augmented square lays into the axial symmetry. and to my surprise 4×4 would do too, but it would be circumcised in a way, as if a piece chipped by a tricky kike to make it stand, and he would rationalize the stealth, the breaking of the artefact could happen by such imaginary cause.


that is interesting, that we have 16 letters of younger futhark, 15 letters of Carmenta, 18 letters of Bornholm's alphabetic runestone, but not 17 letters, pi.ai doesn't know such writing system neither in present nor in the past.



I wonder what silent letters do they mention, because the link leads where they also have 18:
for here they have as many dotted letters as there are in each exact half of the main set.
Which makes me wonder if those two halves are the aicme or aettir, for L and A meet as Λ~Ʌ,
To compare similar lines to non-similar lines, try to pull the third (the dotted) line to any of the two.



подстригся (себя)
подстригли (les (ли~они?))

I Ik Me оН?
Je Ik Me?
Je Me Ik?

Ñ~Й? (thinking of not Ŋ, but Ñ being the velar sonor:

Э Ю Я   how old is this sequence? isn't it a, you, я? e u a they'are i u a then. I U a would be first, second and third grammatic person. BF CG DH IJ KL(суффиксы?) МN(moon? man? money? many?) OP(up?) QR(queer?) ST(set? Seth? Seth? as the signature of the creator of the writing sistem? are IU Io? it is.
I and O are the two vowels, and a became later, first they knew me and you. I and U.
o and you? o and you are both ו, and obviously there's inconsistency about what is ring and what is stick.

ЭЮЯ is the rudiment of vowels. IUA they're IV is how IVXLCD begin (most people know only IVX)
IVX are I(I) U(you) X(something)
X as E? X as А: Ⰰ, ᛅ, ᛂ, E~Ⰰ. Their common and complete form is Æ. and what could it be? some scientific instrument of the path maybe. I think of секcтант sextant.

сексот сектант секстант sect~sex_там?there!тут! s~t, so sect is secs, literally sex.


So this shape only proves that A was new. Some structure, not just hole under it.

is eye of that E? aй! I! A~E~I? Æ when in working position, I when it's folded?

Æ~I

Æ is like a swiss knife. They both are like swiss knife. How old is such shape of a knife? How old can be knives of such kind? Probably half as old as knives (they could appear almost anywhere during their history: nothing more than wish to disguise a knife is needed to bother)
I is likely to be knife, doesn't i look more like ז than ו?
зв as in звон? зван? зови is all it takes.

Of what syllables does

i is in knife, but not in нож. but isn't it малоросское ниж ніж?



ніж knife
ж and f only meet in gh (isn't it Θ)

k is what not or cut? isn't k~n as Г~L? c~n (rotated the same way.. no, differently. unless n is u, ν (which is only showing that Ν~Λ. isn't Μ~Ν? then Μ~Λ? ł, but come on!))

are M N L not Me Ni Les? (the li from earlier session, in постригли (but postrigli is not exclusively they (thow when used separately, that is exactly what it means. We did would be podstriglis (postrigless? less like без (without (isn't it the fundamental difference between лей и less? they are from different languages, eaven though лить is cognate of leak, but what is the cognate of less? без! L~Б? because B~C and L~Г (c~г, naturally, yet it's hard for me to say that с[s] is г[g] ж is in between, but it doesn't prove anything)))))))

Me Ni Les are english, japanese, french. The way I combine those languages as some poles of the same language is bold and isn't approved by academia for a good reason. But then I recognize what they don't, let's play this game my way to see if it proves to be a fruitful path, whether in this particular case it delivers or not.

L ~ l ~ I (ł (we))
M ~ Me
N ~ Нас

k is of ik
אֲנִיHE[ani]



остойчивость - морской теримн означающий устойчивость судна
означает ли это что о и у один и тот же предлог? у меня ~ о(около) меня, а приставка?


Ulcinj (today Uncinj)




Writing on my white board for who knows what time. DON'T CUT (about my hair)
I write it so large, that 'T doesn't come up, and I almost immediately see that Kadyrov's DON is

not

(he tells что есть шутка с нет)
Ш утка ~ Ш алость? is it what Ш is? Tooth. Штука. Што-та. Што?

W is in english Што, What, but is Шутка in those W's? Wonders are the closest I could find. So W is not Ш

J is Ш? Joke, but not WHat. Jak in ukrainian though, and so on, to look what is joke in ukrainian, then to go from there comparing it to words in other languages, jumping from letter to letter to show if there's some structure or not.

Ж is Ш, yeah, sorta. even though Ж looks like double Ш and thus would make a great labial, but the double Ш labial is.. Ф!


Отправил очередное письмо к Будейко:



O      P               S            T
Old: Пожилой Старый Труп


Jack of all Arts,
Master of One. None is even closer that O, but ..this is inyrtrd interesting
(ah, I recalled why I was inserting typoes into my book: they invite the other taboers tapoers)


One None Para Quinta R(100?) Sто Тhousand.
ʃ: H ~ S in Hundred ~ Southand.. Сто I was to say.
Thousand is The sand? so many sand in one hand? "The southern" I was to say, but "the sand" is the thought which came to me before I had chance to write down the previous thought)

Some brackets are broken, figure them out by the simplest form of them when typoed ( or ) appear.

brakets brake the text to add something.

text ~ takes сюда
text ~ takes то
text ~ takes to
takes two to text, not only tango
Is tango take?
Is tango text?
Tango is touch!

Is touch teach tease тычок
ок is okay, not too much, не сильно, не больно, маленько
And I found a new way to form sentences: a sentence per line.
maybe even like that,
to split the text in clauses.
This way I don't mess with the neighbour (as the guy above died)
And here I may use just one extra space between chapters,
for they come from different sides of the screen now.
(but I tried and it looks ugly, this way is the canon)

canon = gun

ano = u?  no, Can = G? Yin? Kin? Tin?

If that J in g is not j but נ[n]
if we rotate hebrew line into a column, it will come in the n-like orientation.
and it actually reflects פ into п

но כ is just C, which may tell that such pairs (and is ז the ʒ in that newer category, category of the new column, the one between fire and water, the steel. Whihc uesd to be air, the gap, which naturally has to be in fire and water, or both fall.

ב reflects into п. Too many coincidences, thus I declare that:
ㄇ the me (П ~ M in a loose hand) they have the unicode for htat that beauty.

This chart is originally from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. I've made it easier to read, corrected the original spelling of "Wade-Gilos" to Wade-Giles, and done things to considerably reduce the file size, which was originally 500 KB. The Chinese text notes that the Ministry of Education promulgated MPS2 on Jan. 28, 1986, making it Taiwan's official romanization system.










































(what the chapaigne-drinkers say (is it female language, like good penis for them is good luck))
chin-chin is probably chinese STAR: 星星[Xīngxīng] chin-chin in japanese is penis


In the context of ㄖ[r] how cool would it be if ⵙ was r, but it's only s. ⵔ is r.
ⵙ[s] is synonymous to ⵖⵔ[ɣr] and both stand for "with" and "to" and russian "with" is с[s]
ⵙ[s] is synonymous to ⵖⵔ[ɣr] as if ⵖ is the central dot. And here behold how much ⵖ~ɣ
Tifinagh is an interesting field, ⴰⵍ [al] is like он=the(he, ال[al])
but ⴰⵍ [al] is "until, up to" and also a synonym to ⵖⵔ(to)


Did Ekaterina rename Yaik to Ural to make it Oral? Was Aral Sea renamed with the same pun (сасать!)
yaiki are balls (like those balls (and also eggs (something to lose? (as in case of a woman))))



Ɔ B З D
E F Г I

Ɔ B D E
E F Г I
ΙΚΛΜΝ
(but then isn't K double Λ?)
and isn't O has to be at the end of it?
I and O opposing each other
O П Т U? U opposing П?
Ɔ П Т U would go better, with one T among Ɔ П U (or would they be Ɔ П С U )

Ɔ П С Џ ?  now that's a good one, though a stretch, but Џ even has the _т in it.

Ɔ П С ϒ ?
was ϒ confused with T?
ϒ the Y looks pretty much like ㄚ, which reminds me of Ⰰ and ᚐ looking like t.
are Ⰰ and ᚐ literally the same glyph? (swashed and not)

там (terra ate[ам (russian т is т in cursive)])
тут (terra от (отдаёт, представляет, исторгает, раскрывает))

ты то та те ту (любопытно, что при переборе гласных лишь та имеет флексию (ту) а ты имело тя, вроде бы (но это не точно))

сии(си) сиё(сё) сия(ся) сие(се) сию(сю?)

и это почти повторяет ты то та те ту, только тогда не сии, а thee? но и сие в единственном числе, а те во множественном. сии во множественном, но в т- с подобной гласной ты.
Ты = те во множественном?
You smile (trying your best to be friendly) when you talk to a crowd.
You smile even wider when you want to be really sweet (and maybe to show your teeth too)



интересный кусочек попался:

and now to something completely different,
Meitei script
What made me bring it here is its canonic indian order is rationalized by the words for the parts of the body going consistently from brain to.. well, it started well, but then it broke so that butthole is up the eye, which reminds me russian meme "глаз на жопу натянуть" (but then is it a genuine meme, or given to us by some modern author, by someone who could see this in meitei?)


The Meitei script (Meitei: ꯃꯩꯇꯩ ꯃꯌꯦꯛ, romanized: Meitei mayek), also known as the Kanglei script (Meitei: ꯀꯪꯂꯩ ꯃꯌꯦꯛ, romanized: Kanglei mayek)[5] or the Kok Sam Lai script (Meitei: ꯀꯣꯛ ꯁꯝ ꯂꯥꯏ ꯃꯌꯦꯛ, romanized: Kok Sam Lai mayek), after its first three letters[6][7] is an abugida in the Brahmic scripts family used to write the Meitei language, the official language of Manipur, Assam and one of the 22 official languages of India. It is first known from engravings on 6th century CE coins and copper plate inscriptions.[8] as verified by the various publications of the National Sahitya Akademi.[1] It was used until the 18th century, when it was replaced by the Bengali alphabet. A few manuscripts survive. In the 20th century, the script was revived and is again being used.[9] Beginning in 2021, the Government of Manipur began to use the Meitei alongside the Bengali-Assamese script, per the Manipur Official Language (Amendment) Act, 2021.[10]
ꯀ ꯁ ꯂ ꯃ ꯄ ꯅ ꯆ ꯇ ꯈ ꯉ ꯊ ꯋ ꯌ ꯍ ꯎ ꯏ ꯐ ꯑ ꯒ ꯓ ꯔ ꯕ ꯖ ꯗ ꯘ ꯙ ꯚ ꯛ ꯜ ꯝ ꯞ ꯟ ꯠ ꯡ ꯢ

ꯑ, the immortality, may become my favourite letter.
[ɐ] as in words ꯑꯇꯤꯡꯉꯥ[atinga] and ꯑꯇꯤꯌꯥ[atiya]

And to close this subject, let's have another representation of meitei, just in case:



  Be     Go     Do

aM
          aRe     iS
  Went

was it why M was removed there? To be above aRe and iS?

Be c Do
 f   Go h
 j k l aM n
p q aRe iS t  Mars?

are rappers wrappers? в смысле могут завернуть
(в другом значении, но очень близким по смыслу "закрывает тему" (and now I checked, and indeed it is the final track, even the bonus track it is on their second album) Бутси доставил в Love is Everything, и как я умудрился узнать это слово, у меня и сомнений не было, что это wrap, а не rap, was it some elusive nature of the vowel or was it some other nature of the R? some special wR?)
But then urbandictionary doesn't understand this term that way. I'm pretty sure it's a wrapper is what Bootsy says.


плот-ней
плот-нее

плот~прот~протекает?

т.о. я разобрал слово плотнее на пло т нее

неё ~ на её? what else could it be? Even on has that n. So do not and не.
So it's too early to tell whether languages come from one centre or many (if there is or isn't centre)
So sefer yetzirah tells that first chapter of bible is not about the creation of the world, but about the creation of the alphabet. And it seems it does, for they used the history of the alphabet as the history of the world, probably believing that how above so below.

что неё (на неё? в неё? с неё? но к ней! о ней, при ней, под ней, над ней (вот она великая разница меж на и над. на неё, но над ней! is д до? но до неё. не её вообще без н пред ней, т.е. это что? не её, на неё! that н[n] is both не и но, but~不Bù[Bu[pu (and it reveals in п being exactly the n in russian)]])) 
and no & pu meet in no! boo! ну! фу! ну(well..) is thus но(but) and не(no)
ну и фу return ν (which might be toe-down, NO U (наше и ваше? для одних это n(nos) для других это v(vos))
Для греков это ν [n(nos)]
Для римлян это v [v(vos)]
Т.е. римляне дали v как n грекам? или греки естественным образом имели v-форму в своей лекции лексике для "down with us" and here I need help from somebody who speaks greek..

v is vs the us

δεν [ðen] not (sounds exactly as then, and it has n, it's the n)
μη [mi] not (and it seems to be the closest cognate to no, before I saw n in the previous one)

English then and greek δεν, I asume such cognates are the most important one. the short one.
then as no? после. post-ne? t and n became л? is t that swash on the left hand of the л? is n the п of other half of it? so N is indeed ן different from ו in that very sense of its coming down.


v~1?
✓~ |, which ν/v and ן/ו show
both shapes go down, but in different sense: for | we draw a straight line down. for ✓ is the arrow down.

but at first I sa so thought (what a gothic cathedral of words) that ו is верх and ן is низ

Something is going on here, and now I need knowers of hebrew to know it.


cat is the ultimate C in russian form of kitty-kitty: кис-кис, and in those cognates t~S
The quesion is should I list simple terms such as alphabet in there. And in the alphabetic order of terms, I should not forget to list them as many times as they're in the text (thus it should be made the last, when I can ctrlF the words of the contents to see where they're met)

I'm the other form of tree, I should cut my leaves to fit the standard of those oaks.
Ash shouldn't cut his leaves to look like Oak

Ash for A?
Oak for O?
                        Ель for Е? F for fir?


be am are is (notice that bmrs is the alphabetic order, and it correlates the grammatic order)
grammar and grammatic are literally letter and letter's (ic = is (both C))

ce [tse] of(or) ce[ke(que)]

Be

              aM
        aRe iS

looking for the basic words of English I may find the basis of alphabet, if it was in English.
My hope is this level is so basal, that it is reflected in every language, especially in such powerful as E.

And the question here is "was there Q or is r enough г per se?".

Then I can see that aM aRe iS are laBial velaR coroNal
Because two of three end with al, I naturally want to reverse velar into veRal
la Bi'al (Vial is a word, and because B~M is of water(вода~море) vial makes great sense)
ve R'al (is ve before ra showing the order? or is ith the R'al? al = all? al = of?
le Ngu'al

French grammar oozes through labial and lingual (for labials are indeed symbolically female, and lingual – male)

velar (whether it was veral and rolled to keep R to the right.. both R and L are in this column!
 I  J K L M N
O P Q R S  T
exactly one under the other. Isn't velar column KQ? it is, but what is LR if not the addition to it.

Have and Will are definitely in the same category of be's, for they're also auxilary verbs.

Be      Do
          Have
   ł→('ll) aM
        aRe iS
Will


were

A    Are
E    Em (am)
 I     Is, will
O    Was Were        Analyzing this thing I noticed that Rimbaud's approach is meddling with it.
U    Would                                                                            like his approach is based upon what?

But then is it not correct in the sense of colours? Red is ready, thus he is and will; O is yellow as oh, U is Blue for should have done it, and only if he would, that is an epitome of a sad thought.

But U is green in his poem, just as U is the opposite to I, so the opposite to Red (Jed? Iodine!) is green, V for бриллиантовый зелёный, which makes not too much sense, but may say that even broken clock show right time from time to time.
O is blue? so they show me, the image.

Why would I right them to be in the rainbow order? They're not in the rainbow order.

My order, which made sense were
I red  (this one linked to Iodine is good find)
O yellow (but this one doesn't make sense, oh is sad, and yellow is a cheerful colour)
U blue (for the word blue, but Rimbaud had it green, for the opposite to red is green)

red yellow green would make sense in both rainbow and red/green ~ i/u sense,
but o is breaking the pattern.
Rimbaud didn't care for the rainbow order, which is bold, but why?

    I O U is me  (this was a piece of automatic writing, and YOU is indeed could be me)

AE   IOU
ME YOU?

a is both M and W in that

is it АЗ? аз is I in old-russian.
is Æ I in some language?

Is Æ a word in some language?
I don't know of any language where Æ is a word, but it is a letter in some languages. For example, it is used in Danish and Norwegian. The closest equivalent to it in English is the letter A. Do you have a reason to ask about it?
I do, but here's a better one: Is ae a word in some language?
Yes, ae is a word in several languages. For example, in Latin, ae is a diphthong that represents the sound "eye" (as in the word "my"). It is also a word in Scots, where it means "always" or "ever," and in Scottish Gaelic, where it can mean "one" or "someone." In English, ae is not used as a word, but it is a common abbreviation for "age" (ae.
æ is a word (or maybe even two words ("ah" and "always") in Icelandic. Isn't it so?
I'm not aware of any Icelandic words that use æ as a standalone word, or of it being used to represent "ah" or "always". I am aware that the Icelandic language uses the letter æ to represent a particular sound, but it's not used as a standalone word in Icelandic, as far as I know. Perhaps there are some local dialects or slang words where it is used that way?
Wasn't æ a separate word in old-english?
You're right that æ did exist as a separate letter in Old English. It was actually a diphthong—a combination of two vowel sounds—that was represented by the letter ash (Æ, æ). In Old English, the letter ash was used in words such as "dæg" (day) and "bær" (bear). So while æ wasn't a standalone word in Old English, it was an important part of the language and represented a specific sound that is not found in modern English.
Wiktionary tells that æ was a stand-alone word for law, marriage, rite. Isn't it true?
Interesting, I haven't come across any information that suggests æ was a standalone word meaning "law", "marriage" or "rite" in Old English. However, I'm aware that Wiktionary is a collaborative project and may not always have accurate information. So I can't confirm or deny this information, but if you have a specific source that you trust, it might be worth looking into further. Either way, it's clear that æ was an important part of the Old English language and had a unique role in the written and spoken form of the language.

 æ is always in Icelandic
 ǣ is law, marriage, rite in Old-english (and as prefix it is also always(?))
 æ is ever, eternally, at all time in Old-norse (and also "eat" in "I eat" and "eat!" (or feed))
 æ is "be!" in old-swedish (second-person present imperative of vara(to be, ot occupy place))
 æ is the in dannish

 æ is I in jutish!


But since we're at it, let's comb through other languages too:
 æ is have in "you have" in ligurian
 æ is yes in middle english (I wonder how "law" of old english could become "yes" in middle english, but then it could be something like "word" is used today to say "of course")

and another one:
                            æ is I in norwegian nynorsk!

but we continue,
 æ is river, running water, stream in Old English.
it is interesting that it has complete cognate in an austranesian language:
 ae is water in Aore (was it somehow borrowed from the next line's sailors?)
but then ea is eau in modern english too: (UK dialect or archaic) A river or watercourse.

 ae is mother in Abinomn
 ae is eye in Bislama
 ae is to stroke, pat, caress in Danish (interestingly enough, the past tense is aet)
 ae is water in Eastern Ngad'a, and in Aore, which I mentioned before, and in Ende, and in Li'o
 ae is liver (not river) in Irish
 ae is tree in Kala and in Lote
 ae is chicken in Khumi Chin
 ae is go up in Lavukaleve
 ae is current, pool, coolect, gather in Marshallese
 ae is emphatic particle in Mbyá Guaraní
 ae … ae is either … or in Middle Welsh
 ae is hey and oh in Niuean
 ae is wasp in Pará Arára
 ae is oh yeah in Portuguese
 ae is bird in Sardinian
 ae is one, only, about in Scots
 ae is to dig, to hollow up in Teanu
 ae is father(and such) in Touo
 ae is to laugh in West Makian
 ae is foot, leg in Wolio
 ae is to caugh in Zhuang

But then what was it all about?
 iou is I (not you) in Aromanian (that's in Europe) and Macanese (that is not, but sorta, it's Creole)
and nothing in any other language, according to wiktionary, so what is it all about? Is it an example of pronouns' antonymy? it definitely is, but then ae is I and iou is I? I&I?



Just wrote a feed-back to RobWords:

Also what were the chances that in ten days we have Парад планет с участием Меркурия, Марса, Юпитера, Урана, Нептуна и Сатурна 28 августа 2024

and here we have their prediction of what it's going to look like in ten days. Mercury is naturally much further from the Sun than on those diagrams it is. The distances are way larger relative to the size of the planets. So it looks very probably, the closest to the sun too. And what we have here? Isn't it the order
of the days in a week? Is it the origin of that order? Because I think I just read that they're standartized:
Бывают малые и большие парады планет.При малом параде Венера,Марс,Сатурн,Меркурий выстраиваются в одну линию,то есть четыре планеты.
При большом же параде шесть планет выстраиваются в линию - Земля,Венера,Юпитер,Марс,Сатурн,Уран.

But then I should double-check this info, because they predict six planets to align, and the next piece tells that it was two years ago, though it happens once per 10 and 20 years.

Малые парады планет наблюдаются довольно часто,почти каждый год,а вот большие происходят обычно раз в 10-20 лет.
    в октябре 2009 года и в мае 2011 наблюдались мини-парады
    самый масштабный парад планет был в декабре 2012 года
    следующий большой парад планет ожидается в июне 2022 года

Also they list Mercury only in the four-planet parade,

If you end up missing out completely, planetary alignment is not as rare as it sounds, and there will be chances to witness the parade again. From Space.com's perspective, it is quite common to see planets lined up along the ecliptic from our perspective on Earth, and it occurs a few times a year

So that was just a coincidence, or what? They probably go all the possible way, or the internets mess with me, that is also possible. I have mistakes in my books, do you think you don't have them in yours?

but I had to rearrange the order of that alphabet. Φ Ρ just substitute 𐌚𐌔

Thus I may compare them in the light of lexics, to see which words can be synonyms in those languages, such that they would reflect the different in pronounciation of those shapes, and then they also should represent objects looking like those glyphs.

having less, only 11: