It is volume III of one weird book:
0 1 2
(this part is not only raw but also
sometimes repetitious, because it's a draft, and in drafts I
revisit the same topic again and again as goldminer returns to
his mines)
א angel, a-l
ם me, мы and if we compare it to left & right, שםא
is how we see others, אםש
is as we see ourselves.
ש шайтан
(I just stumbled across it in the final
sentence of the vol.
2, that
was a grey text you had to read)
We don't know in what language these
structures appeared, so any language will do. They're all
synonyms across languages, so some words forgotten in one
languages still live in another.
don't be surprised on following rawness, for I research it as
I write.
This revelation of three mothers
being
birth (бог?) - man (me) - w looks like ש and ת could be z,
though this similarity is probably caused by common
similarity of alphabetic lines.
If it's M & W is it man & woman? because I wanted to
speak of Man & Wile (Ewil.. so Eve it is. I told you
Deva & Eva are Devil & Evil. It's all yin/yang.)
Бог, Мэн, Уоман - такие же три первых настоящих персонажа в
библии? Я снова возвращаюсь к библии. Хаха, я начал с Сейфер
Йециры, Ш юю...
allows us to say that א is not soil, but air, as Sepher
Yetzirah said. Yet if א is air, in the context of שא & מים
it's שמים. Which makes א a derivative of ם & ש.
If you only knew how difficult it is to
combine semitic to european scripts, הmans fought
beasts before they conceptualized a good god. Though reading
what they've conceptualized about them may make us respect
them somewhat less. Though soil, not air is the more common
among elemental systems, what if it's the both. Air is the
product of the earth, without the soil there would be no air.
And ש is the chaotic energy which is some other force, and it
makes us guests from space? Otherwise we would be the Earth
itself. And are we not? We ARE! water is also earth? if air is
earth, water is also earth. Isn't fire from within (and from
the sun as well btw) a crucial part of the formula? It IS!
And they say that trinity is the one.
And I go on with my research:
Х ~ Ж if we recognize X as stavless Ж, ᚷ as stavless ᚼ
Also because J can be read as Ж [j] in french, but as ᚷ [h] in
spanish
And position of russian Ж correlate greek H (and Z is after
it, not in front as in greek. So does it make greek later
relating to russian? In russian second row Z stands in the
end, not in the front, but do russians have F after E? No, but
Ё. (I spoke about it whether in this version or look for older
ones in web archive)
ᚷ as stavless ᚼ exp;ains hot ~ жара and makes me believe
that's the same t as in to, which comes ть in russian & る
in japanese. (I)t seems to come ra in russian, while in verbs
it's still tt. ротацизм сюда же
.
co and go are invariants, and I suppose me in come is
literally me, which make it two different directions.
Here's something I've put into chapter
of swastikas, but it was after I
spread this text, so you could miss it:
one benevolent witch taught me that swastikas are not
lucky and unlucky, but male and female, I guess it's all
yin-yang thing, and though sun goes sunwards, she told me to
look at ursa m??or.
And she's right, northern
sun
is on the south and goes rightwards, which is explicitly
clockwise when it's high in the sky, while the northern
sky
itself rotates counter-clockwise. I suppose sun is the man,
while sky is shy, she, the one which embraces him in der
himmel.
![](nazi_files/a27ee-sternenkonstelation2-1.gif)
![](nazi_files/Draco_wide.jpg)
Путеводная звезда не луна, а полярная? Луна календаря, Солнце
часов. Полярная для навигации
А какая планида отвечает за дни недели? 7 солнц.. может это
именно что абстракция, как метр.
4 времени года, 4 недели в лунном месяце. 4 фазы луны конечно
же! 4 времени года совпадение, что наш разум двоичен, и может
ещё среднее найти, если цикл, то средних два. вот и
получается, что 3 части
и(у
) линейной прогрессии, а 4
— у цикличной (год, месяц..
а что такое час, минута, секунда может быть сердечным ритмом,
т.о. календарь с часами привязывают наши циклы к космическим)
ut re mi fa sol la ti?
lati utre mi fasol!
bott end with l
both ends are l as if gamut was a ring (a ring of a
spiral it is)
look at how it go on piano keys and you see where's that L
(between sol & la))
but
untremifalsol..
utremifasollati is alphabetic:
ut is the only note beginning with vowel
re is vowel in hindi & srbsko-hrvatski.
mi & fa are the only ones beginning with labial
sol la ti are all lingual.
ti reflects archaic T of ת
I didn't expect to find it when I began
this paragraph.
as you can see on the following images, the lack of B, B/H
discord, could be caused by B whether being prohibited
(them I'd bet it was connected to tritone
being prohibited, but I can see its tritone is neither to A
nor to C, so it could be not) or to who knows what
secret is hidden behind this misconsequences.
on this one we can see si or ti as te:
yet on this one we cannot and many musicians I asked about H
didn't know and didn't seem to ever wonder
notice that H & B are invariants in
japanese. Can it be connected? nah..
let's collect some more of these:
and this image is clickable (I'm going to link my images
more often from now on) and that link has brought: seculorum. Amen, often abbreviated EUOUAE.
it's some tool to denote syllables, I have to read it
myself and will return to this topic later.
Also notice, that it has B, but not ti. And
I think I found my H, as bekar after b, notice how ♮ resembles
h, so it could be the source of the B/H misnomination, but I
have to dig further to tell it for sure.
Surprise is that in my own city lives another kid who've found
something incredible in russian alphabet:
(clickable)
We see K breaking sequence once again (does it mean it wasn't
tabooed, it wasn't invented in those ancient abecedarias of
some archaic latin
(I'm not sure that
period is named archaic, you look it up yourself if you care
of the exact taxonomy)
Also П can be an invariant of R which would go farting (the
sound only some most ancient native americans lost in the
jungle speak this sound. That 3-vowel tribe, I wrote about
them, I don't remember the name.
This sequence of voiced-sonors-voiceless. Is not present in
english, but we know that G is invariant of C and that C used
to sound like G, at least I read it.
It is arranged as if students begin loud and clear in voiced
forms of the letters, but getting tired their voices became
less clear until it switched off completely and only wisper
would come out. O & especially У are way more tired than A
& E, vowels could also influence the enthusiasm of
pronunciation. So it could be either appear this way
naturally, or be arranged this way to ease the reading of the
alphabet.
Let's see if such a sequence is present in any of other
alphabets.
latin:
A
B C
D E
F
G H
I
J K
L M N O
P
Q R S T U
V W
X Y Z
greek:
Α
Β Γ Δ Ε
Ζ Η
Θ Ι
Κ Λ Μ Ν
Ξ Ο
Π
Ρ Σ Τ
Υ
Φ Χ Ψ Ω
compare to russian:
А
Б В Г Д Е Ё
Ж З И
Й
К Л М Н
О
П Р
С Т У
Ф Х
Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я
in russian it looks as if they link in
elbows.. but if k is also such
![](III_files/ZH0tl1xA97E.jpg)
an elbow (and not just later
addition breaking the ancient symmetry) then I have to agree
with roouh that what we have here is three groups, for ЙЛМНР
are all named sonors: [jlmnr] but I'd rather believe that
they're untuned by insertion of K and originally there was
no K & they all were voiced. Then R is also out of
sequence, and as K & R are graphically similar, it seems
we found another key to this clockwork, for I always
wondered how could it be that P is R in russian? Bornholm
runic alphabet also doesn't have P, so I think R used to be
lingual "fart".
R is also secondary, because there are more important letters
in that row, namely T. and because QR look like diacritic OP.
and russsians take P for R (Р)
hebrew:
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י
כ ל מ
נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
(it goes right to left)
is somewhere near greek:
the only difference is that postionian greek doesn't see H as
[h]
and that hebrew includes some additional letters (surprise!)
but
they are voiceless, so who knows maybe it tells that they
follow
this voiced-voicelss tendency more.
So is it just a coincidence, which became quasi-structure in
one
of them, or is it common among all of them one way or another.
I would look for some structural tendency if latin shows no
tendency of having more voiced in the first half.
But P instead of B, T instead of D, I think this
voiced-voiceless is set from the initial ABD/VFH
but let's conduct the experiment:
A
B C
D E
F
G H
I
J K
L M N
O
P Q R
S T U
V W
X Y Z
Еven in latin second half has more voiceless letters, but it's
on the brink of losing this tendency completely:
First half contains 4 voiceless: CFHK
Second half contains 5 voiceless: PQSTX
(even
though the second half as we broke it is 2 letters shorter)
And if we cound voiced, then
First half contains 7 voiced: BDGJLMN
Second half contains 5 voiced: RVWYZ (and if we count VW as 1
& Y as vowel, even less: 3)
But if we remember that LMN are the beginning of the second
half of the alphabet (as official etymology of "element"
tells) then it's only 4 voiced in the first half, and even if
we exclude W & Y it's 6 against 4, which breaks the
tendency.
J
I
H
G F E D C B
A
K
L M N O
P Q R S T U
V W X
Y Z
But M is named as central letter, but even if we count
J,
A
B C D E
F G H I
J K L
M
N O
P Q R S T U
V W
X Y Z
well, in this case first half has 5 voiced, and the second -
only 4 (but if we turn W back on?)
It could also happen this way in latin because of some reform
of sharing the voiced through the structure, not to make the
pyramid way to obvious that bottom doesn't have a say.
Anyway, latin is an exception among those I've seen above,
let's look into georgian alphabet, to see if it's just some
hellenic fluctuation or some truer symmetry, which could be
cause by BD PT of some ancient unknown alphabet, mama first
papa second, baba dada also go this way, and if some southern
nations call papa baba, this deserves its own research.
The reason I throw away R & not P is because the grapheme
P is known in both latin & russian
&
greek, while R is only in latin. Also cursive k is
even more similar to R than K and we need P as labial in our
common structure of ABCD (notice that ABC also has voiced
before voiceless)
then russians have П but no Р (could russian Р be invariant of
П as if it's voiced form, even though it wasn't voice but
bright vibration of lips. So could be R voiceless too (then we
don't have to exclude it here) for it's brightness is not
necessary on vocal cords, for it comes from tongue &
alveols?
georgian:
ა
ბ გ
დ ე
ვ ზ თ ი
კ ლ მ ნ ო
პ ჟ რ ს ტ უ
ფ ქ ღ ყ შ ჩ ც ძ წ ჭ ხ ჯ ჰ
this image includes ჱ ჲ ჳ though they
were excluded from the modern I gave above it, and it
doesn't have ჯ
and also excleded ჵ ends it with few more signs I don't
recognize.
Surprisingly, in georgian voiced-voiceless tendency is less
preserved than even in greek & hebrew
(or is it, on contrary, promoted) for
not only R but several other voiced letters appear in the
second half.
Still it's more obvious than in latin, especially if we split
it as it is, however we break it the most of voiceless are in
the second half. But if M is the central letter, both halves
have the same ammount of voiced.
In conclusion to this paragraph I have to say that this
tendency is definitely present, but if it's artificially
conceived or has it occured naturally this is almost
impossible to say, probably reformers of russian alphabet
noticed this tendency and fostered it a little.
This tendency also supports the idea of russian В being placed
in the place of F, for it could be voiced before, they say it
used to be W - semitic vav is voiced. And В looks like θ which
used to belong somethere.
Let's look at all of the sudden spectacular russian if we
consider Р [r] voiceless (whisper of r is r)
А
Б В Г Д Е Ё
Ж З И
Й
К Л М Н
О
П Р С Т У
Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я
it's only K out of structure. And the border exactly where
that roouh saw it:
(I also write
mahead with m)
just as I couldn't figure out the ancient linguistic
understanding of linguals (made by tongue) wandering among
alveolar, dental, so was that guy mislead by knowing too much.
Sonors, huh.
Though If I understand Р
(Russian R
looks like P) as voiceless because it's whispering
has no pair, and thus voiceless M is also M. while voiceless
BDGJVZ are PTKCFS
(C here is Ch, for
only K is always K)
Then we can understand russian alphabet as
А
Б В Г Д Е Ё
Ж З И
Й К Л М
Н О
П Р С Т У
Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я
was it logic of those who placed sonors among voiced &
voiceless? let's look at those sonors:
А
Б В Г Д Е Ё
Ж З И
Й
К Л М Н
О
П Р С Т
У
Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я
and in halves:
А
Б В Г Д Е Ё
Ж З И
Й
К Л М Н
О
П Р С Т
У
Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я
and I was thinking the other day: " what if Ф is initial form
of P, because there's no Ф in latin, but that's not what my
thought began with. I began with looking at runic labials: ᛒᚠᛉ
and even ᚢ all are dual. except P, which is neither in the
bornolm runic alphabet (named by von List as armanen runes)
So what if these two rows are voiced & voiceless and as
genomic apparatus checks for mutations comparing two strings,
we can reconstruct earlier phonetics of those alphabetic
signs.
А
Б В Г Д Е Ё
Ж З И
Й
К Л М Н
О
П Ф С Т У
Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я
but the counterpart of Ж is Ш
А
Б В Г Д Е Ё
Ж З И
Й
К Л М Н
О
П Ф С Т У
Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я
There's now now labial after У, but only because there's no
labial after EЁ
but it's F after E, and it's Ф after У
but Ф is already used. but what's use of the two voiced after
O? Ф may be used instead of P, then why П?
let's look at latin once again:
A
B C
D E
F
G H
I
J K
L M N
O
Ф Q
R S T
U
V W X
Y Z
most of the voiced mess is in the final line (we russians have
all final line of vowels, what is your voiced)
so let's look at it in the ancient form:
A
B C
D E
F
G H
I
L M N
O
Ф Q
R S T
V
V could reflect F for some reason: Vav is voiced F, V is read
as F in german: von sounds as fon.
A
B G
D E
F
O
Ф Q T U
V
what is it? two octaves? but they're in sixs, not sevens.
could it be related to 6 being so popular among heathens? Are
those 6 reformed pentatonica? Then 7th note would be the
further reform (maybe even from some other confession)
So what was the initial form of those two "octaves"
A
B G
D
O
Ф Q T
Ф is long P, double P.
(B is read as V
(in greek & russian) and pey and fey are the same letter
in hebrew)
then B is doubel b
(B is v in russian,
Б is b)
so now there's 8 of them. could it be where the word octave
comes from?
now these two lines are in abcd mode. let's look if they can
be in axial:
A
B G
D O
Ф
Q T
actually yes. and V is envoked by it.
A
B G
D O
P
Q T
V
Shouldn't I make up my mind if V is labial consonant or vowel?
But it is both, in different cultures it's both, and sometimes
it's in the same culture both (as vav in semitic languages,
even though both lineal & axial symmetries recognize vav
as labial consonant, and maybe that's why both و & ו stand
for "&" and both are consonant labials: و is wъ, ו is v,
and we can see that more modern arabic has drifted more
towards vowel u, and today ו can be used also for u & o,
but to make it o (literally "or") we have to put aleph before
it: או, which reminds me of יהוה being transliterated as Io,
which reminds both greek deity (and I'm not exactly sure it's
the same Io whose priestess invented alphabet, but wth, of
course it's her) and polynesian highest deity of a cult very
similar to judaism, I think I've already wrote about it, and I
think I wrote that ה makes ' & ו vowels, but isn't י vowel
by default? Those who know hebrew probably laugh at me right
now.
that abgd-opqt pair keeps v vowel, and yet I'm not sure this
reconstruction reconstructs any representation actually
existing in the past, roouh begins with one ancient russian
abecedary, and look at it, it breaks the alphabet in half
exactly between voiced & voiceless (wonderful thing is
that k is missing, and it doesn't seem to have enough space
for k:
![](III_files/s9DW9Lx0yIsW2V6WFBszcj6Vy3T8TLikXIUiuaDDSu_OxSFLLanntwSqlL1B06pD-YiIJ3Itd4DyuqD1uKL60gDmIT1GWyQcLmkxrfg_RoC75WkKo1REduRDuyvjlMAN.jpeg)
though it could be a coincidence, because he puts о in the
previous line.
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י
כ ל מ
נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
tells me that if that
voiced-voiceless order is the original one (it's more present
in hebrew, than it is in latin, and it is somewhat general
that voiced tend to gather in the beginning of the alphabet (B
is voiced, K is not, so now let's look how it is in eastern
ones:
they all are voiceless by default and
゛
makes it voiced (only the sonor ones are voiced already: m, n,
l/r
wait a minute, there are more of those: it goes a ka sa ta na
ha ma ya ra wa n
![](III_files/hiragana3.gif)
so it's definitely voiceless (those to which ゛ can be applied)
in the front, sonors (voiced by default) in the back. it
breaks between ta & na & only ha goes exceptional, and
it is exceptional, because it can be applied with ゚ to
make p- but it's b when ゛ is on it's right upper corner, but
it's more funny than this, because that ha is more weird than
that: it's wa most of the time: boku wa baka gaijin desu,
sumimasen, this wa is actually that very ha, so if it's wrong
that it's ha or not, it's exceptional, and other than that
mayarawan are all sonors, and kasata are once again remind
second half of the first raw: as if ha was replaced from it's
honorable position. ahakasata - is it how it was? because I
was already seeing things like aka satana (akai is red in
japanese, and -i suffix is the same as russians use for
adjectives, and russians sometimes just don't use that suffix
to create so called "short adjectives" which may tell that
adjectives are as ancient as nouns and verbs. red can be even
more primal than raid.
But back on track, what I wanted to say is
א ב ג ד
ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע
פ צ ק ר
ש ת
arranged as voiced-voiceless may present its primal form:
א ב ד ה
ו ז י
מ נ ע פ ת
as four representations of the same two letters, as
sillabaries do, but this time with only 4 vowels & 2
consonants, even before 5 vowels, B and T
You can notice that this way they're grouped according to IPA
into plosive, fricative, nasal, whisper.
IPA puts B&D in the same group, and
D&T too, so I named those voiceless whispers by miself.
Which may witness something about the jewish vowels
themselves. Is O a wisper form of A? Because
ע is related to O. It could be
more related to У, but it stands at O position. Though if we
compare the final line of jewish alphabet with У line, we get
У as
ע and Ф as
פ which is
direct transliteration and Х as
צ which is weird, though cursive
צ looks like З
(there's no unicode for cursive, so watch it up in that .odo
addon) and initial X does sound like Z. Ц as
ק which is equally weird, though C
could stand for both, Ч for
ר
which is quite a coincidence, because cursive ч looks exactly
like cursive r - is it why they call it cursive? as of curse,
the script which made them misunderstand one another, tour as
cour? Ш
ש which
is exact transliteration again, Щ as
ת
which is just wonderful, because after that go some
weird theatre of vowel row, beginning with silent special sign
named "hard sign" (твёрдый знак) and graphically ъыь remind
666 as much as uvw remind it in other domains, but I already
wrote about it.
How I reconstructed that
א ב ד ה
ו ז י
מ נ ע פ ת
is I began at the
ה ו ז ח ט and
removed the messing
ח ט
because we don't have these two in russian (is it an argument
enough? but what if russians had alphabetic canon before
christians, and though I only shyly attempted to notice this
possibility (because they were caught redhanded in this sort
of crime of claiming authority over something they didn't
author)
after that it was clear that has to go (because bornholm
alphabet's first row only has ᛒᚦ instead of BCD, because of b
d symmetry shining on so many levels: BD, БД, ⰂⰄ, 𓃀𓂧 and
even
בד are
probably here, but сСГⰃ(𓈎𓎡𓎼)ג never plays this game, which
makes me think it should go from the protoalphabet (it also
didn't exist in that mythic 5 vowels, B & T, and also only
latin alphabet has velar column distinctly, unlike the others)
I knew M had to go first, an we still have N following, which
marks L as invariant of I further in history than N as
invariant of I (И) if it even is, for if it is, M must be an
invariant of И too, which would be super weird, because I is
lingual, and M is labial. but AIU correlate AMT if you even
know what I mean, I think it's one of those moments when I'm
so high in that depth, that even me won't be able to make
sense of this.
So here I already had a distinct pattern, so to determine
which of many voiceless sounds of the fourth and final row go
into my reconstruction of protoalphabet wasn't difficult at
all. P & T of course. which is kinda sad, because I
expected to see this bd
pq in the first draft of it.
Is T secretly Q? Then D is secretly C, and what if they write
чево as чего only to entangle that subject even more. There's
no "they", they don't know shit.
and what about
אמש?
same, truth is
אמת
and
ש is for
שטן
then what is S on the chest of
Supermensch?
here some noisnunts began, and though
it had some clearer parts, I put it separated.
(you are supposed to click these green
ones)
Roman secunda is 24 times longer than ours
Does it mean one hour in their system was a term for a day?
Година is hour in ukrainian, but year in russian: год is year to
be precise, so russians would understand година as год.
Is it why "сейчас" (now) is more likely to mean "сегодня, сего
дня" (today) than "сей час" (this hour, tohour) - well, no, сейчас
сегодня собраны по одному принципу. сей и сего - просто в разных
падежах. Но разве разница в падежах не являет иную грамматическую
форму? если бы их собирали одновременно, то сейчас, сейдень.
"Сегодня" более изысканно флектуатическая структура, а значит она
с некоторой вероятностью была собрана позже, потому что "сейчас"
это китайцы так слова собирают, а они законсервировали грамматику
на самом раннем этапе из всех что я знаю. И я считаю что это
свидетельствует о древности их письменности и языка. Could
egyptians just combine chinese & meroitic principles for
political reasons and so
(fo(r) to so - бо
which is ибо, or is it too wild to mix languages in one выборке?
I don't know I write if as my own draft, so I use both
languages, co is form of go, or visa versa, and if -me could be
me, fuck ''''s, co is not russian ко, к, semantically they are
different. but "на хуй" (на ~ к) has semantic values of go, So I
wanted to prove that come is not ко мне, but instead I found
verbal features in prepositions) both communities could
read the text? (that grey text before it went into something
important, read at least the end of it: prepositions may have
verbal values)
Ни сегочаса ни сейдень не замечено, кроме фразы "по сей день"
((up) to this day..)
but back to that outstanding claim that prepositions have verbal
meanings:
пере = пр(ыгай) (s)pr(ing) pr(one) (прыгает на)
but also пырять. you do understand how easy it will be for them to
ridicule you here? he who's affraid to look foolish doesn't have a
chance to become great, so they say, the other they.
у- stands for something like away (and for way in "way (too big)")
notice that it's у [u] common between away & out, which in
russian is вон, прочь, от as direct cognate of out, which corelate
it with off and of.
Which made me think of u- (especially initial one, or even any
initial vowel) to inverse what follows: out = of, idi = go (idi is
go in russsin: иди) and there probably were some other examples. I
reallly have to scan those notebooks. that very k appears in
japanese
きて (kite) and 来る (kuru) both -te
& -ru are verbal suffixes. (ru is pretty much english
to, put as postfix the way russians put -ть and even -те
(literally te) also notice how て looks like t, I'm pretty
sure there's more to this than just coincidence.
至る (itaru) is another translation, and though it also stands
for "through" if it's written with another suffix, 至て, it's itate, which reminds me of
russian идёте [idöte] and not to look like idöte
myself, I think I will leave these
comparisons to some passionless
statistical ai.
I think those guys can make some awesome job using the
brave approach I offered here, comparing all the
languages globally, ignoring all the human-made
definitions, reconstructions & divisions into
families or whatever. And then maybe even other
animals' languages will be compared with ours.
This alphabet which is persian, not arabic (arabic lack few of
these)
ا ب پ
ت ث ج چ ح خ د ذ ر ز ژ س ش ص ض ط ظ
ع
غ
ف ق ک گ ل
م
ن
ه و
ی
is also alphabetic if you watch at the first letters in the
groups:
ا ب ج د
ر س ص ط
ع ف
ق ک ل
م ن
ه و ی
all I was going to say is
ه و look
like E F when they're written in a different font:
هو
(you should try to type mixing hebrew or
arabic with latin or russian, it's a mindf
----use this merged coloured hu in
.odo-----
Notice that having removed the doublets, we got ourselves 18
letters, which is a magic number of 3 sects
(sects are aettir but of 6s)
sso is 6s & 8s the same old war for geometric forms (arabs
adore 8-poiinted star (it's united) while jews prefer 6-pointed
star (it's separated)
6-pointed star is probably historically more ancient (it's both
less points, 18-letter alphabets are older than 24-letter ones,
judaism is older than islam) but 8-pointed is also a cross. and
sun shines mostly across (but it's because of the effect our
eyelashes create (because sun rotates together with our head, and
the cross is seen when eyes are half-closed, otherwise sun goes
all the way)
The idea of separation of the alphabet into voiced & voiceless
can be used as an instrument to deliver the previous form of the
alphabet:
ا ب ج د
ر س ص ط
ع ف
ق ک ل
م ن
ه و ی
First I noticed that this way we have vowels in the end (as
russians coplete it, as greeks had omega, as runic alphabet had ᚢ
(v, u (oo)) and roman alphabet had V, v (v, u) and russian
alphabet had Ѵ, ѵ as finals)
And just before those vowels ن [n] stands and in greek minuscule
[n] is
ν
and after jewish
נ
[n] stands
ס which looks just like ه -
could there be some cultureal correlation (and the script is of
the same size, but hebrew is extra large in the text, otherwise it
was really small, and arabic is in normal size (as is all this
text) let's make it extra extra large and compare them:
ا ب ج د ر س ص ط ع ف ق ک ل م
ن ه و ی
ا ب ج د ر س ص ط ع ف ق ک ل م
ن ه و ی
ه stands where
ס
does. and they look the same, and I hate to diss your concealium,
consealium, what is the word.. concilium, but I must notice that
after n o fololows, and it looks exactly like
ه
and
ס especially if you know they're
backwards. So who's reading those texts wrong all the time?
ه is definitely closer to o than
ס, especially if you transliterate it into
jewish
ה which
stands where e does, not o. but in arabic even though
ه is closer to vowers than
ס
is, which also reminds greek σ - which resembles o just
strikingly! and σ has it's own story of how Σ looks like E and
that school=ecole, student=etudiant, and some more examples of the
kind there is. scream just gets rid of s or e, and it's
cri
and even though it's not greek, but french, just as sign
languages don't correlate speaking languages, so writing
systems can be not corresponding with the languages they're
used for, hence this babelonian mess I'm disentangling here.
and ◯ could be a holy symbol, named by different nations
differently, and thus... just a speculation
but if
ه is sun,
و
can be the moon
and they stand together in the second row, where E & F do, and
F is moon, because it's not always full.
and F is connected with fornication, and moon is the night, which
is more proper for sex, and it's literally 6
and 6 looks like
و, though 9 would fit
more. And if we count it backwards from
و,
we may find that if
و is 9, then 1 is
ع which opens the second half of the alphabet,
only it not begins, but ends with LMN. And it's 10 of them in that
second half, and the first half is of 8, and if we abruptly
exclude 9 & 10 from the second half, we'll get alphabet of 16,
as that "younger futhark" - I believe it's literally younger than
it's older form, like when the system wasn't developed enough,
when it was young. see the mindf/?
and the final letter looks like 。 which is as ◯ named maru. and 。
is japanese . and dot is how one of ugaritic alphabets end (I
never saw the artefact they took it from, but it's there, in their
literature, I guess.
![](III_files/ugaritic.png)
So if
ه is a dot,
و
can be a comma. And whatever
ی is, it can
be wind if
ه and
و
are sun & moon.
(in one russian fairytail a prince asked from sun, from moon &
from the wind. Are that another representation of trinity? saint
spirit is similar to wind. but son as sun seems to be related as
heresy by older religions, father is the king, that's the old
order, son only transmits its will (even when king is dead, he was
deity ever-living), then son is not sun, but moon, man he is.
But back on track, why don't I go further
and don't compare ع to three? why stop
where it's convenient? have I ever stopped? then I'd call ا the 1, then I'd see nothing better than to
name ج the 2? then ط
the four? nah... though I think I saw something of the kind
somewhere (here I wanted to dig deeper, but no, this path, if it
even exists is still too early for me, I've already bought books
on history of numbers, so I must read them, but I have so many
thing to do, so I must go on train to make myself read.)
و can be a comma especially because
it stands for "and"
LMN ending the alphabet makes another sense because it ends it
with aMeN
and alumin is a joking mocking of аминь, but that as I heard it,
aluminum was considered the most precious until we figured out how
to extract it. alumni is also a word meaning of which I still
don't know...
anciens élèves
ancien élève is alumnus (singular form of alumni is alumnus,
so it's a latin word and I haven't switched the dictionary
from french. turning it to russian I can see that it's not
something ancient, it's выпускники, so to say old students. isn't alumnus cognate of eleven? (-en =
-es in different languages I spoke about it, why do I even
dig this raw grounds?)
what happened here? why all this alumin part is so poor? probably
because I just switched into physical work, thinking of doing
something else, and moing just first thing, I gravitated back to
this text again.
(so that's it for today, let's do something
else indeed)
al aMeN
(so maybe alphabet is an ancient prayer? I heard it was used as
some magical amulet. then additional letters were to correct the
ancient grammar
: as in который instead of
коий, but I don't say this word was there, I just say what I
think, and I'm still in that working mode, I didn't go as I said
I have to.
al aMeN
stands for "the truth" as I was told, Amen is
אמן - but reverse translation translates
is as artist, but in yiddish it's recognized as amen again.
Any way, that
אמן is definitely related to
אמת... I guess I found myself a better
jewish script: א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ
ק ר ש ת at least now it's in full size, and here we
found why that one was so small, it made latin smaller too.
that אמן is definitely related to
אמת I was thinking about when I wanted
to compare that al aMeN to those three mothers.
But let me finish this topic before I go away:
ا ب
ج د ر س ص ط ع ف ق ک ل م ن
ه و ی (red are voiced, green are voiceless)
First i wanted to guess that
س ص
ط are some ignorant extras, so applying that
voiced-voiceless thing we can replace them and
ل م ن ه و
ی too, but now I see: what if their structure was
to keep silents inside and voiced outside? Doesn't it make sense?
It does. So hail diversity, or something, let all the flowers
bloom, some of them may happen to be of youth and you don't know
which (use, not youth, but I cherish typos, and this one can be
exactly right: some flowers can be of youth, and we don't know
which. and even when we gain the eternal youth, those flowers
still can be of use to us in the eternal future it's for sure)
Why did I remove all those dotted invariants? Because inclusion of
those ones disrupts the structures in european alphabet, ancient
texts are reported to include no dots. at least in hebrew, I'm not
sure of runes.
I think I already mentioned it somewhere before, but this sequence
also has la
bials after v
owels:
ا ب ج د ر س ص ط
ع ف
ق ک ل م ن ه
و ی
and again
م is the exception, yet even
و is preceded by
ه,
which makes me think that
ی could be
lingual y before. As if this sequence was before. hm.. anyway if
ی is vowel in that end, it puts him along with
greek. Though that shout.. shourt.. short like ..line is weird,
the same is in gu.. ugaritic. I'm also hungry now, goeedbye...
notice how that very i-line is collected in the end, as if it's
the newest, the most disrupted too.
Notice, that
ه isn't actually vowel in
modern arabic, and
ی can be shortened to
й, the [j] and only
ا and
ع are always vowels.
و
too can be vowel, but just as
ی, not
always, so these final two also make a pair, a pair of
semi-vowels. and
ه is probably one of
them, though it's never vowel in arabic, it's always vowel in
hebrew, and always vowel in greek, latin, and all the others
actually.
I didn't find much when I looked for
ع
being the same sign as 3, but it's also the same sign as E. And
both are followed with fey, and b is for бог/ so are these just
male & female pairs (which makes sense: women historically
(and actually physiologically) had less voice (half of that of a
man in shariah court) and yet vowels were named female letters,
and females managed to have more vowels, and more letters than man
(as they have bigger attention to nuances, just as they have names
for more colours than guys usually do) and more labials are on
their side (the ratio is the same as with vowels. And isn't it the
answer to why there are three mothers, but four or five labials? B
is Babushka, the Granny (B & G the same again. Бог Господь)
Granny can be kinder than mother, because she's way less disturbed
with freudian bs, and mothers often have no idea how to treat
their children, once again, it's just a speculation, something can
happen out of it, I have long went into draft mode, if you want
something more certain you should probably stick to the first
volume, and even there be cautious of my usual liberties. Feя,
Mother, Vulva? I'm only guessing, looking for the most female
words. Female, Fe in that word plays the same role as Wo in Women.
Here Wo sounds as We probably because We is actually a plural form
of Wo () which tells a story of that word being of female origin.
Parts of Garifuna vocabulary
are split between men's speech and women's speech, and some
concepts have two words to express them, one for
women and one for men. Moreover, the terms used by men are
generally loanwords from Carib while those used by women are
Arawak.
Unlike other languages of the region, Yana has different word
forms used by male and female speakers.
Интересной особенностью чукотского языка является то, что
женщины и мужчины говорят по-разному. Для женщин существует табу
на произнесение имён родственников мужа и похоже звучащих
слов[5]. Разница существует также и в произношении обычных слов.
Там, где мужчины произносят звук «р» или сочетание «рк», женщины
произносят звук «ц» или «цц». Например, «морж» в мужском
произношении звучит как «рыркы», а в женском — как «цыццы»[6].
Другие примеры: мужчинами произносится ч, женщинами — ц:
чайвыгыргын (муж.), цайвыгыццын (жен.) (в предложении
Чайвыгыргын мыгитэгъэн! / Цайвыгыццын мыгитэгъэн!) или
чайвыгыргын рэгитэӈэ (муж.) — цайвыгыццын цэгитэӈэ (жен.); «с»
также может заменяться на «ц»: мылгынутэсӄык панрэвкы (муж.) —
мылгынутэцӄык панцэвкы (жен.) (в предложении Тыӄэӈавытыйӈын
мылгынутэсӄык панрэвкы вальык нымӈиӄин / Тыӄэӈавытыйӈын
мылгынутэцӄык панцэвкы вальык нымӈиӄин)[7].
here somebody collected such cases for us:
Some natural languages have intricate
systems of gender-specific vocabulary.
- Irish Sign Language, due
to single sex Deaf schools, developed separate male and
female vocabularies which can still be seen today.
- It is speculated that Sumerian women had a
special language called Emesal, distinct from the
main language, Emegir, which was spoken by both
genders. The women's language had a distinct vocabulary,
found in the records of religious rituals to be performed
by women, also in the speech of goddesses in mythological
texts. There has been some dispute about the role of
Emesal, with suggestions by some scholars that Emegir was
a dialect used by the public and more informally while
Emesal was a literary language.[59]
- For a significant period of time in the
history of the ancient languages of India, after
the formal language Sanskrit diverged from the popular
Prakrit languages, some Sanskrit
plays recorded the speech of women in Prakrit, distinct
from the Sanskrit of male speakers. This convention was
also used for illiterate and low-caste male speakers.[60]
- Garifuna has a vocabulary
split between terms used only by men and terms used only
by women. This does not however affect the entire
vocabulary but when it does, the terms used by men
generally come from Carib and those used by
women come from Arawak.[citation needed]
- The indigenous Australian language Yanyuwa has separate
dialects for men and women.[61]
- In Ancient Greek, there is
evidence for some difference between the speech of men and
women, as evidenced for example in the comedies of Aristophanes.[citation needed]
- In the Lakota language, a small
number of enclitics (approximately eight) differ in form
based on the gender of the speaker. While many native
speakers and linguists agree that certain enclitics are
associated with particular genders, such usage may not be
exclusive. That is, individual men sometimes use enclitics
associated with women, and vice versa.[62]
I'm pretty sure you yourself know some words girls use guys would
never use or only jokingly.
Also that list lacks japanese difference in male & female
forms of japanese:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_differences_in_spoken_Japanese
(huh, now I see it as my duty to add
Chukchas & Nihonjintachi to that list, duh)
If Man & Woman are words of female speech, Male & Female
are probably male cognates? Is Fе Вы or We?
Man initially "of some ma, born" could be botched in male mouth as
male, and could give birth to personal pronouns me & мы.
Pronouns, prefixes, suffixes, copulas, these short words and
whatever definitely have keys to the protolanguage, I believe if I
focus on them, I'll be able to see the structures language owned
when it had no other words than the short ones. And if I had an
access to the real ai power I would ask it to compare chinese with
those short words.
But a guy who has this
access is to curly to be friends with such a nazi as me, I
didn't even troll him, but he didn't understand my love to ахс.
And not as if I wanted to be friends with him, because though he
works with ai, I was told he dislikes them. Why? Because he
loved chess, and AI made this hobby irrelevant. Can you imagine
that mentality of that guy. And as usual, he has the key to the
lab even though he's not the best fit for this place. It's hard
to have fit pals for every plays when you are just a tiny
minority and your role is to moderate the progress, so it
doesn't boil over the top choking
the fire.
Матерный язык delivers again:
fuck yeah / fuck you
yes / no
but in russian it seems to be the opposite:
хочу / хоти
ти = ты
чу = я? I only know аз as the previous form of я in russian. I is
Ah in scottish language of Welsh
(even
though he's scottish, he's welsh, it was my first guess "who is
he? welsh? no, human traffic is welsh, irish? scottish? he's
scottish, edinburgh, like what he's name? welsh? he's scottish,
but he's name is welsh? Imagine if it's a brittish psy-op to
seed subconscious enmity between scottish & welsh? Who am I
now? A great political expert? Why do I dig into this? My minds
digs, probably I should leave pol forever. please do. Ah
is similar to аз, because h is the vinal letter in the second row,
just as з [z]
H / 𐌆 (sometimes it's even more like rotated H, but isn't I
sometimes? that H / 𐌆 I took out of some weird place, but it
still revokes the question of H E Σ S Ϻ M I И H Н N n п р p r г ג
λ Λ L l I (if Λ, why not A?
ا!)
isn't it just apophenia just at least this
time? I don't know, some of it definitely is, but my and ai task
is to figure out which is and which isn't systemic.
ти ≠ ты: хотеть (ть=to), хотим (м=мы)
so хот и корень. hot!
欲しい (want (хотим (хорошие (
良い (good - and I didn't expect how
close it'd be to hot!)))))
Apes say aiou
I heard of a guy telling that you can understand any language by
its inTONEation.
Did he speak of vowels? Come on is equal
ot
to на..
да ну, because come is red as kam. because on is ~ u
(as if initial vowel inverts that n (greek ν [n]))
I need ai to create dictionary in vowels.
imagine how that ape would read this line: a i (screams) u ie ioai
i aue
How many words can be written in 5-letter long vowels?
5 vowels * 5? nah, you mathematician. it's factorial.
it's probably not, because we can use the same "coin" more than
once.
once is flexic form of one. as funk
in 1 vowel and up to 1-letter longs we can create 1
word
as if c = time, as if n = ну in ебаца
in 2 vowels and up to 2-letter longs we can create 4 words + 2
words = 6 words.
in 3 vowels and up to 3 letter longs we can create ? words + 9
words + 3 words
aaa
aai
aau
aia
aii
aiu
aua
aui
auu
in 1 vowel and up to 1-letter longs we can create 1 word
in 2 vowels and up to 2-letter longs we can create 2 words + 4
words = 6 words.
in 3 vowels and up to 3-letter longs we can create 3 words + 9
words + 3*9 words = 39 words
in 4 vowels and up to 4-letter... oh boy
a
i
o
u
aa
ai
ao
au *4
aaa
aai
aao
(aau * 4)*4
aaaa
aaai
aaao
(aaau *4)*4)*4
in 4 vowels and up to 4 letter longs we can create 4 + 4*4 + 4*4*4
+ 4*4*4*4 = ...
in 3 vowels and up to 3 letter longs we can create 3 + 3*3 + 3*3*3
? yep, 3 + 9 + 27
in 4 vowels and up to 4 letter longs we can create 4 + 4*4 + 4*4*4
+ 4*4*4*4 = 340
in 10 digits and up to 10 digit code we can create 10^10 + 10^9 +
10^8 + 10^7 ... ?
what? ah, yes, 10-digit code (as on a suitcase) cannot have
1-letter words, so it's just 10^10
in 10 digits and up to 10-digit lock we can
create 9 999 999 999 +1 (0 000 000 000) = 10 000 000 000 codes
in words it would be 11 111 111 110 words
in 5 vowels and up to 5 letter longs we can create 3935 words. And
it is enough to communicate even on human level. but hardly do
apes have 5 vowels. yet intonation is not only vowel, but how it's
pronounced. one word can be said differently to mean different
things.
I thing witgenstein spoke about
something like this, but I didn't read him, my friend told me
about it. come on! may bе и да ну и давай
Now we're talking of decoding birds' & animals' languages.
is ' i?
Intonations allow to use the same letter differently: aa may
differ depending on which letter is stressed:
aA is
universally(?) yes
Aa is
universally(?) no
universe ~ необротимость? static scene? the
space where everything is revolving but it's still. Is it? nah
verse ~ оборот (буквально "враща-"(ться, ет(ся), ем(ся), ты = те?
морфологически ит ис. ет = тот?)
-ешь(ся) shows how these forms all correlate "to eat" есть (this
also means "to be", so it could be an auxilary verb hiding in
suffices in russian words)
форма ем созвучная английскому am uses
e
m which is common in "me" & "мы" (we) and it shows that plural
& singular become distinct after the concept of person came in
use.
делаю или враща-ю показывает местоимение io стоящее возможно в
одном кластере с я. два юса?
ю - общая форма настоящего времени для первого лица единственного
числа
(т. е. не me, похожее на мы
(в русском
встречается в виде мене, меня)
а я (io, I, ю)
тогда is форма второго лица? в латыни -es вроде тоже. -est у
третьего лица (-ет)
делает а делают? est в сравнении с es говорит что t главное в t
реt
ьем third
лице
но где-то эта третья форма использовалась для второго лица? ты!
да, это не вежливо, но до сих пор иногда применяется, когда тыкают
в человека пальцем и спрашивают у него "он что думал?"
H is in переменном ряду (в разных алфавитах он по разному себя
ведёт, иногда этой буквы нет)
Зная форму рунической ᚷ которая может быть staveless ᚼ
предполагаю что h в русском стала ж, как дж в английском где в
испанском что-то типа х. Но скорей всего наоборот, в русском она
сохранена чётче (h стоит в столбце переднеязычных (coronal) что
говорит что она скорее ʃ чем h.
Что делает he & she инвариантами, и помимо Бьорк поющей шуман
вместо хуман, вчера слышал песню, где парень пел she там где по
сюжету было he. что же это была за песня? а, да, самое начало
альбома Genius/GZA "Liquid Swords" - когда маленький (и возможно
беззубый) пацан рассказывает про своего отца, говорит he так
словно это she. She - шепелявая (беззубая) форма he.
Но тогда he первична, что противоречит тому что я только что
городил: dh
ا ب پ ت ث ج چ ح خ د ذ ر ز ژ س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک گ ل م ن ه و ی
ه often looks like e, and in alphabetic symmetry ه
stands where e does.
Thus a bigger idea: what if we recognize all alphabet as
representations of the same system, and compare letters to
recognize their true semantic value:
A may look as an ox (as phoenicians
(phoeniciantists) recognize them, but A
& 𐤀 are the closest forms, when we compare it to hebrew and
arabic, it's somewhat different: ا of hebrew directly stands for 1
and if you think what it can be, it's a vertical figure without
many branches, it's a man.
but if you compare it to hebrew form, to there are two hebrew
forms: cursive form is very related to 𐤀
(I couldn't find hebrew cursive in the unicode. I think I should
look for it in fonts... use images for now)
![](III_files/CursiveWritingHebrew.png)
ИКЛМН are all forms of alef? what a surprise! (Н is N in russian
& N is M in modern hebrew cursive)
once again, I missed a thought:
ه often looks like e, and in alphabetic symmetry ه
stands where e does. though eee looks like ههه
but also M looks like that: م
Мmm looks like that: ممم
Which made me think "what if there's some symmetry between م &
ه ?
and this path brought me to the following representation:
a b c d
e f g h ѳ
I wonder
what happens if they start transliterating ה as e & ט as ѳ
i
j k l
m n
ס
I have no idea how to
transliterate ס
so that it's not mistaken for neither c nor s.
o p q
is it true s and s is
actually ш?
r s t
I just thought h was ш
I wanted to reflect m to e but ended up with breaking 6-literal
lines into 3s
(well, it's very christian and it could stand for 6 being jewish
or satanic, and 3 being of triunit theme)
3-unit is thiangle. That A & 𐤀 could stand for it, but the
thought was that ا is one and
א
shows solar swastika, which make that figure not man, but god. And
here again pronouns collapse (or do they merge) with deities. (I
& I where one is me, and the other is god) it explains why A
looks like masonic pyramid. and 𐤀 does keep this slope, and is
that curve a ray of light? and what is modern cursive hebrew?
further decay of that glyph or something bigger than mere mistake?
are they axis of the earth & crescent?
謎です
א
ב ג ד
ה ו ז ח ט
י כ ל
מ נ ס
ע פ צ ק
ר ש ת
this was the thought: if M is vowel, N must be labial
and though I can even imagine that ש is acually W
which would correlate to english wh standing for russian шо
& че
third row still doesn't have a labial and if I proclaim כ similar to M, for
it looks like פ
& ב
(for
かか
[kaka] is mama and look what I
just found:
かぞ
[kazo] is father)
but I still can see if this hypothesis is anywhere near being
valid by trying to build its axial symmetry:
א
ב ג
ד ה ו
ז ח
ט י כ
ל מ נ
ס ע פ
צ ק ר ש ת
sortah, but
nah, not really.
technically yes, but no
刀/刂 (かたな, トウ) sword
かたな is japanese word, トウ is chinese (it is dao in chinese)
as if 刀 is t (see the graphic resemblance to
it &
ת)
it, tot, bothe are t, the third person, teh
final time, last is bothe the final & the previous. past
as if 刀 is t and か is k and then compare k to ᚳ [k (or tʃ)] which
is probably the cognate of ᛏ [t] ᛐ (the same t) and ᛚ [l]
ᛐ could be some form of ᛏ when all ᛚ is taken out of it, and
ᚳ [k (or tʃ)] is probably the same k of ᚴ, because in Bornholm
there's only ᚴ and I saw it before, when on that very Bornholm
stone
You're peopol of the book, I am peopol of the notebook.
notebook is not book. that is the main difference betewwn the two.
тетрадь это некрнига.
though seriously note is not, knot,
not
there didn't ask me it appeared by itself (I wrote it
unconsciously) not
ais
singular of net.
here poetic ambiguosity
appeared, and it's true poetry for ai is of net
but I
was just changing as into is that wasy
not as node.
knot is related to net? knet?
тенет!
тенёта,
род. тенёт,
дат. тенётам
и устарелое
тенета,
тенет, тенетам.
for ᚳ is both k and tʃ (ч) t & k are relatives, invariants,
the same in a way
as cha & tea are the same hieroglyph. дик & дич
ь are the same. плачет плакал. Malkovich
Novoselic
or a more straight-forward example: Richard & Rick. Why R
& D can be the same is another question. They reflect this way
in k-symmetry & they're graphically similar. Both could be
forms of ᚦ as if R is a binde rune (though in russian it's just
Р[r] and they make it with tongue, so it's weird the letter
doesn't have it)
I am a dyslalic mutant who
pronounces it in a european burry way (burry? translator said
burry) rhotacism could also be the term though that term has the
opposite meaning in t
between vowels.
ᛦ is rh?
Ψ is ᛉ? what are those additional greek letters reaaly? all in
really is that very all? so many questions..
The list of dyslalias can be a powerful tool to understand what
phonologic structures are more recent.
I and Me
male and female egos and gods
Jah and Mater
Je m'appelle d'me t'rei de mati rei от матери реи (земли? геи? до
геи ещё рея, реальность)
в русском редуцированная de обрела гласную пред ней: от. Is that
от
הt? as in
japanese o, o!
![](III_files/triads.png)
This image
represents those 7 greek vowels as a part of the talisman. I only
wonder what is the sevens triad on the other side (5 types of
animals could correspond the initial 5 vowels, 6th triad could be
the celestial bodies, but what's the 7th?) for I noticed triads in
them in egyptian alphabet: 3 birds, 3 types of animals, 3 body
parts, 3 parts of a circle (whole, half, quarter. and those other
forms are in the same relation: a big, a middle, a small) anyway
what is the fifth triad in egyptial alphabet?
Russian and English have very similar alphabets, Greek & Latin
are very alike.
So how could it happen that they have different understanding of
the same symbols?
Why и can be written as u in russian cursive, but и [i]
Why p is read as coronal R in Russi?
Why c is sometimes s sometimes k - but this one is another thing,
I think s is a palatalised k ~ h ~ ш
as japanese palatalised s is understood as s by some, but as sh by
others, when it's actually sch, щ
(that swash at the right bottom corner of that щ is palatalization
of ш - tatar alphabet has more of them.
here you can see how clasters tend to group
(compare
this tatar alphabet to russian, on the base of which it was
based) but that is not the only school of tatar alphabet,
the following one uses another tradition: clumping them all in the
end:
(or dumping?, but clumping is even
better, a word I didn' know)
I'm not even sure it's palatalization, just some method to form
invariants russians used once or so.
Another alphabet based upon russian alphabet is bashkort alphabet:
![](III_files/bashkort..png)
another table of bashkort alphabets existing in different periods
of XX century:
For some time I couldn't figure how k may belong to HIJKLMN
cluster other than
hik
kup is a thing.
Now I can see it's h'
I found it comparing forms of Mike: Mika, Миха, Михаил, Mikael,
Michael, ch ~ k
Also returning to that idea of H standing for Ш - more common form
of Миха [miha] is Mиша [
misha]
I'm crazy. Why? I am crazy! Why
? Why is for the futur
e!
here I was mad
at me because I cut my finger
Greatsy is looking for new ways. Some of those ways are ways off.
and I was talking of how we all mad
way is for the future!
though
being mad damaged or changed my
weg is
wil
(but I
eraseed that typo fest)
capabiltiy to think. Why is why for futur?
gilmel = lamel again
What is the
goal of all these crazy actions?
ג = λ
Where are you going with this/ Will you invent
the protection
Or you're just bumping around
bumping yourself to your grave?
futur is further.
Let's
create protection from any possible damage. It's concrete
spheres
upd: why is not only for the future, but for the context, for the
road goas both ways, and if you ask in the past "why did that
happen" you ask about the course of events, and they answer with
because, which is the same as by course. by is be? War&Peace
by Tolstoy = War&Peace is Tolstoy. bi is banks? I was thinking
of bystanders so now let's think of bistandards, double standards.
standarts in russian they use t there. art stands as standart.
etalone
notice how high as the sky I am, my thought
travels through my neuronet, catching here & there seekin
Thus will is forward, was is before, would is wood? like if those
three or more directions relate to elements of the world, they
should correspond. wood is a combination of earth & water, as
would is combination of future & past. which is future &
which is past? future flows, changes, undefined, past is solid and
unchanged as much, uneluding, not dissolved in the sand, which
acts as earth in some extent. probably people of the past saw sand
as earth without water.. they didn't use withouts. they declared
it as earth+fire? let's see it in chinese books:
Nope, they're using way more abstract meanings. And speaking of
gods as abstractions in the comprehension of the masses, we may
ponder on that later, but looking for the sand in trigrams,
futile:
I dare to doubt that summer & winter are not the opposites,
Summer & Autumn shouldn't be opposite this way as just bothe
monograms switched. I would accept Spring & Autumn as
opposites, but not summer & Autumn/ something is wrong here,
let's see if it's structural flaw or if that immage is mistaken:
Trigrams digrams
search only brought me these two misleading relations between
tai ji & the seasons.
So I seeked for trigrams
summer and I found that this field is in somewhat complete
chaos, some of them are probably clueless:
So I searched in chinese for 卦夏季:
And one image told about relation of trigrams
to hours of the day, and another one could only tell me what I
already knew, but in another perspective, which brought it here.
So for they don't really
know what which digram stands for, let's look into that other
weird school we stumbled upon in volume I:
dry dead
some branches are dry/ m to g just came, based on the weirdest b ~
g, which is gimel=lamed
(upd: it's lambda,
and the fact that greeks named their letters in female forms,
supports the idea of greeks giving names to their letters before
jews (a link to it is somewhere in the text, together with the
idea of kabbalah originating in greek culture)), thus
double c is B so is it just vertical wave, and b is it's staffed
form?
(if you don't understand it, I just
read it and I didn't get it, skip such pieces freely)
M ? M is B as Л is Г. arewn't they those wife & man?
I can see it requires explanation, maybe later.
then double Л is М and double C is B and Aᛒᚦ is ABC and D as an
invariant of C, it's staved form.
That is why g is G in endlish, but D in russian. G is a voiced
form of C. See, roman alphabet is latin as later for it explanes
its form way less than runes. And did I say that clueless child
will find runes more archaic than even archaic latin.
I use archaic instead of old which is entangling
text for non-specialists, which is a standart academic symptome
originating in a bigger influx of second-language writers.
double Л is М as double C is B
ᚦ is a male strike with an axe. and in huntrit (let's call
hunters' taal this way) it's man leaves such marks
ᛒ is some more information, in one blow weak man (arms as wigs)
cannot do. Wig man is wicked witch
so have we found the woo root in woman, wife, femakle?
imagine how rude other words for stereotyped categories can be.
Nigger is tabooed as we speak, but it only means black in german..
isn't it schwarze? swarzenegger is black пахарь.. black plowman,
ploughman, plougher.
Pflüger. what is negger really? I was
brought about with that concept that schwarzenegger is
чёрный пахарь. что было бы странно, учитывая что африканцы
не слишком-то пашут, у них и так всё растёт. и египет
переводят как чернозём ложно. это на арабском может египет =
африка = чёрная земля (земля чёрных) - но возвращаясь к
шварцу (который негрь (уголь? несгоревший или негорел..
негрила.. не горилла? )) we humans will probably have to
leave these old words away. and leaving in capsules we'll
have some other features (may them be good) and gender and
ethnicity will be the least of them/ Niger is a name of an
african country, so my rude etymologis can be more offensive
than the actual ones, but that's how it is heard and
subconciously understood, so I don't know if Niger is a word
of some african language, but it could be caught out of
their language pool for being recognized in some european
language wrongly but with a fun banter.
ᚠ ᚡ
ᚢ ᚣ
ᚤ ᚥ ᚦ
ᚧ ᚨ
ᚩ ᚪ ᚫ
ᚬ ᚭ
ᚮ ᚯ
ᚰ ᚱ
ᚲ ᚳ ᚴ
ᚵ ᚶ
ᚷ ᚸ ᚹ
ᚺ ᚻ
ᚼ ᚽ ᚾ
ᚿ
ᛀ ᛁ
ᛂ ᛃ ᛄ
ᛅ ᛆ
ᛇ ᛈ ᛉ
ᛊ ᛋ
ᛌ ᛍ ᛎ
ᛏ
ᛐ ᛑ
ᛒ ᛓ ᛔ
ᛕ ᛖ
ᛗ ᛘ ᛙ
ᛚ ᛛ
ᛜ ᛝ ᛞ
ᛟ
ᛠ ᛡ
ᛢ ᛣ ᛤ
ᛥ ᛦ
ᛧ ᛨ ᛩ
ᛪ ᛫
᛬ ᛭ ᛮ
ᛯ
ᛰ ᛱ
ᛲ ᛳ ᛴ
ᛵ ᛶ
ᛷ ᛸ
That theory of axe-taal I just brought equalizes
ᚦ to
ᚴ which is ocay because A is ᛆ
and
ᚲ is a
staveless ᚦ, for double ᚲ is ᛃ and ᚭ = ᚮ as that futhark chart declares.
which makes boustrophaedon possible but makes ᚿ [n] equal ᛆ [a] and what about ᛐ(ᛏ) [t] and ᛚ [l]? Well these two could
be related, for even in latin minuscule t looks like a
dashed (dotted?) l (not in this font, in cursive) ᛲ & ᛋ are shin & sin,
invariants. So what about ᛆ [a]
& ᚿ [n] ? Initial a can stand
for no, but what about the phonetic difference (first I
wrote it dicfference, but now I decided to cut off the
typos. Thinking about what it means to be crazy, I found
that some ways are to be cut short. Typose are one of those
things. I still leave them, whatever.
Today academia.edu sent my way this work:
Alphabet or Abracadabra? Reverse
Engineering The Western Alphabet. by Wim J Borsboom
(
mirror)
Which is an independent discovery of the same structure. And if
before I made my best to avoid reading other books on the subject,
to keep my research as independent
(and
from the mistakes of the other authors) as possible.
Recently I have felt myself way more confident and began
spray-buying books on history of writing systems. And nobody
seemed to see the obvious symmetries of vowels. The best I could
buy is a collection of writing systems of the world without much
of describing, but who really needs it on paper when it's
hypertexted in the internet.
Where you can
also find some freaky fellows pulling texts in one language to
another (though if we, russians,
read texts of older than five centuries we have problems
understanding it) so my task is to collect all the primal
words, to compare the most simple of them, to understand the
phonetic liberties those words allow and if something other than
white noise emerges out of that venture, we reconstruct the
following language from that scratch.
And the fact that this guy makes his research from scratch is an
evidence of this field being just new born. Or I would never heard
about him if there was no internet, so who knows how many
independent researches like him managed to see AEIOU
structure. It's so much in your face sometimes, but people
just can't see it, it stunned me when I first witnessed it - as
they say, there are those who see, those who see when you show
them and those who don't see. And it's tremendous how many of
people don't see. Those proverbal 95%.
![](III_files/Scientists-and-Belief-1.gif)
And thus only few of us can see. So
all the science is probably carried by those 5% of people who can
see when they're shown. But of course even in scientific community
they're in minority. Or am I just getting too counterproductively
bitter? For I know that some smart people believe in god for
whatever reasons, just as many not so bright people believe in god
for some wrong reasons. The same people who believe in god living
in russia
used to be atheists while they were living in ussr
Wim J Borsboom uses the following image:
![](III_files/tumblr_myyn6cRDiz1rgfuxjo2_r2_1280.jpg)
Which I missed not recognizing abecedary in it, leaving it for
later when I speak greek.
But it is an abecedary, a plane from a set of
four.
But while I was looking for other three, I found an opinion that
it is a forgery:
http://preearth.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1181
(
mirror)
whether you accept or deny their arguments, it's quite a vault of
information on the subject and a rabbit hole I maybe will descend
further. But because forgeries are possible, I wanted to focus on
modern forms of writing systems (for these symmetries were found
in them, so I can research it further using only modern material.
But public wanted me to look into what historical linguistics
tells on the subject, even though it doesn't actually speak much
(and half of that is false, alas))
Wim J Borsboom brings the term Varga to the table, and gives an
interesting guess that difference in eastern & western order
of writing systems could be caused by those vargas (labial, velar,
coronal) misarranged by a traveller who brought them to the west
on separate tablets.
(he also was confused
by some common misconceptions of consonant alphabets &
medieval origin of minuscule, which I debunked earlier, so I'll
give him a link to this part, so he can patch his approach)
which is another explanation of that switch, that it was not by
some religious reasons, but by mere accident
(which I doubt, because of the reasons I gave
before (greek Z for Zeus replacing Θ for
Θεά
as one of them))
He derives alphabet from India, which is understandable, for
hindus do recognize vargas
(I'm not sure
it's the correct form, I only found it in astrology, but he studies
sanskrit, so he probably knows it better) while in
western tradition this knowledge seem to be completely lost and
only rediscovered here & there and hopefully somewhere else
(followin part of this research will probably
include more guys & gals excavating these corpus of human
concepts)
Another image from his work:
brought me this artifact:
with these writings related to it:
![](III_files/J.WC.nonGk240.19.p02a.jpg)
![](III_files/J.WC.nonGk240.19.p01.jpg)
I can only guess how the other three lines are related to it.
Probably some scholar just compared them.
Where I took it (images are clickable) it said:
description: Bucchero bottle from the regolini-galassi tomb, Caere
catalogue number: 780
LSAG reference: 240.19
date: c. 650 - 600 ?
object type: Bottle
region: WC
sub-region: Euboic Colonies, Italy (Chalkidic-Eretrian)
archaeological context: Caere
publications: Buonamici, Epigrafia Etrusca pp. 104 ff
local script: Non-Greek (Etruscan)
inscription script analysis: not available
transcription: α β γ δ ε ϝ ζ h θ ι κ λ̣ μ̣ ν̣ ξ ο π Μ ρ σ τ υ χ φ
ψ Ϻ, not M, those academics! lol i'm
mad
I brought this bottle here only to satisfy my urge to collect all
the abecedaries in one place (though I hope somebody does it
better and before me) and mostly because it represents inverted B,
which caught my attention in roman cursive
b
() and egyptian
𓃀
(though of course it could be just a
scribo, for only right-to-left etruscan seem to write it in
reverse. (but once again, who knows if
it's forgery or not) though I only know it by
looking at what google shows me)
I think some good ai should look into what that guy could find for
of course I am biased to see clearly what he reconstructs (I read
it researching so my head got tired when I got half through it,
and then I read some more, though I told you not to. And I also
typed all these (from "Today academia.edu")
I also shall return to that reading mostly
to understand what prevented me from comprehending his
argumentation to maybe understand what prevent most of the
people from comprehending mine.
Ϻ is san, such an old letter, like jewish צ for it stands there
somewhere. But it looks like W, which as Ш
Σ does look like Ϻ rotated counter-clockwise. but it stands at
another position, phonetically ~ the same
Ш stands even further. It's like those three forms are spread
through the alphabet on some distances:
Z is the opposite of S (probably that's why they needed another
stroke on Σ to rotate it into З.
is it 3?
ЗΣϺШ such is the order of this abugida. Was it why they had to
move Z closer to the E, to make intervals equal? are they equal?
we'll check it in a moment.
Isn't E itself rotated Ш? Maybe as 2 mothers of three.
Then there should be 4 of them (one is hidden, as Y from UVW)
What is the third first? M!
З [Z] must be the fourth. twice more linguals than labials!
ЗШ are ZH of the greek alphabet?
E is in the same line!
F, f? or Θ, θ? (I was looking for the labial, and both letters
which are left are labial. was it an attempt to make the count
even?
like if linguals are doubled, let's double the labials too? thus
MN? PQ bothe N & Q are still linguals, but they could have
that M pronounce to them, so could russian юсы & french nasals
be of that origin?)
We russians we didn't care if it was F
f
or Θ
θ, we drew both as Ѳ
ѳ and draw as Ф
ф
today. Θεά is Фея
(I think I should notice that more usually
(for more modern words) they use Т instead of Ф
Θ looks like ט in jewish alphabet. And ט is recognized directly as
T.
Θ is taught to be T in uni
versities.
So second row in greek is three mothers?
and
fourth additional one. And somethimes there are 6 of 'em
Then every other line is three mothers.
We saw it in ABC (
ᛆᛒᚦ shows that ᚦ is bothe c
& d: staveless ᚦ is
ᚲ.
Oh
I have some nerve! It's freaky)
ᚦ standing for both d & D shows that boustrophedon is
possible.
As we saw it before I think in
this tome
ᚦ (þ probably is [
θ]
in icelandic but Δ is [ð] in greek. was it the exact pair how
linguals doubled in voiced & voiceless? For M & W are
always M & W then F is V? no, there was not W when F was V for
it was the W, as they transcribe it in phoenician. But do they
translate it correctly? I should really sustain modern writing
traditions, restraining from ancient reconstructed ones, for
mistake is always there just as here I probably make many;)
one of them could well just be coming up. take it as poetry.,
etymologic dictionaries have mistakes too.
Is "to die" like an euphemism? Like "to dye" like with your blood.
And even if you fall, bleed somewhere else, don't dye the furs of
tiger, mammoth or whoever gotcha. Or whatever they wear, like not
to smell of blood, not to disturb the animals, not to let them
smell you. So hunters wore furs initially just to cover their
smell with smell of that animal whose skin they put upon? To steal
u stealthly. It's a horror bably, the ancient horror of stealing
cubs wearing their mother's skin. boy, wicked.
See how baby is related to babble. babbling babbly baby babé
Dubious? Maybe. But it will help foreigners to never forget the
word babble. Petersonian truth, huh
those russian flags, meh, I should start using memeflags, as a
protest agains russian government supporting commie regimes across
the globe, for themselves secretly being a commie regime.
They have some nerve, or they just didn't read Milton Friedman
scientifically proving that the less state intervenes the economy,
the better is the economy. He did it through centuries &
continents, but I onlly read some of his short ones when I was
around 17, and I got it instantly, because I had the bright
example of soviet economy before me
(don't
trust their propaganda or statistics. numbers for 1983-1988 were
published in 1982 (I don't
remember the exact years, they depend on their five-year plan.
So they published digits they planned to achieve, but as far as
I know, not a single plan was fulfilled)) though if I
didn't read or heard of his research, I would think soviet decay
was caused by discouragement of initiative & free enterprise,
but he made even broader conclusion, I think he's right, because
in today's beautiful russsia of the future government doesn't
prohibit free enterprise, but they regulate it to near-death and
those regulation are also corruptly arbitrary which actually can
be both good and bad for any special case, but it's all not
helping the common economy, au contraire.
The translator used double negation, but you've
got the point
And though these things may be more important than what we
research here, there might be some political games, but luckily
not for long. Their service is no longer needed and will be
substituted with ai-powered society of free entrepreneurs. or
maybe we all won't even have to hustle for entrepreneurs among us
will take care of communities around them, providing free place
& power to create our own food by printing them, while those
entrepreneurs' ais would be surveilling his neighbours via
microscopic spy-drones that nobody produces too much of explosives
or doing some other dangerous stuff. and thus those entrepreneurs
would be watching eachother, keeping their surveillance in open
sometimes, so everybody is watching eachother and hivemind
whatever challenge they're facing, so no big daddy or big brother
is needed anymore. It's not even that much of the future, it's the
present unfolding in front of us.
OPRST (as it is in russian & greek)
Greeks used to have Ϻ where lating has Q and in variants closer to
phoenician, also Ϙ after Ϻ
These addditional letters made sense for
together with Ϝ it addded alphabet up to 27 which was 9+9+9,
which was their numeral system of 999 similar to roman numerals
because both had cycle in 1000.
I wrote about it before, they used overlines to multiply numbers
by powers of 1000.
So they didn't even need sampi, which makes me think hm.. have
sampi (ϡ) ever existed? Isn't it San sent to the back of the chart
as they did to many other letters? And the following image says ϡ
could be exactly Ϻ, and another one tells that Ϻ could be exactly
Σ:
![](III_files/sampi.png)
Sicyonian is from Sikyon:
![](III_files/Ancient_Greek_epichoric_alphabets.svg.png)
AEOLIA has to be special. It consists almost completely of
vowels, and their order is AEO, very alphabetic.
IONIA also includes only one consonant, but Aeolia has more of
them, and L is somewhat more vowel, even though N looks like И
& H is its invariant is vowel in greek and И used to be H.
L looks like I though. Ionia & Aeolia are such similar names,
as if they are dialects of the same thing. Like yea, they're both
greek dialects. But how could Ionia be even not in Athen's, but in
Anatolia, how could its dialect become the official one?
Though I see explanation in the comment to that image:
Distribution of "green", "red" and "blue" alphabet types, after
Kirchhoff.
Studien zur Geschichte des griechischen
Alphabets by Adolf Kirchhoff (1867)
But the first attempt to find this book brought be some Cambridge
book for £64.99 and with no Kirchhoff. All this is so tiresome.
Next search brought me 1 Used from $38.92 + about the same price I
will have to pay to putin's post-office. Thanks, but no thanks.
https://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/fs1/object/display/bsb10585083_00037.html
(
mirror)
and that lawyer world makes us all lie Ja to
Ich versichere, die Nutzungsbedingungen
gelesen zu haben und die heruntergeladene Datei ausschließlich
für nichtkommerzielle Zwecke zu
verwenden.arrowNutzungsbedingungen (Europeana Rights) for
something older than 150 years for fuck sake!
Maybe some day I know german and read it.
And Ϻ and Σ are indeed invariants:
San (Ϻ) was an archaic letter of the Greek alphabet. Its shape was
similar to modern M, or to a modern Greek Sigma
(Σ) turned sideways, and it was used as an alternative to
Sigma to denote the sound /s/.
Unlike Sigma, whose position in the alphabet is between Rho and Tau, San
appeared between Pi and Qoppa in
alphabetic order. In addition to denoting this separate
archaic character, the name "San" was also used as an
alternative name to denote the standard letter Sigma.
(this smaller text is quotation from somewhere seemingly reliable,
reading references is a whole another research I don't feel like
doint gon, we... doning
now doing now
doing now:
wiki where I found it doesn't give reference for that very
paragraph, but it has a history of edits:
San (Ϻ) was a letter of the Greek alphabet, between Pi and Qoppa. It had a phonemic value of
/z/, but eventually became disused in favour of sigma. The
latest attested use is in the 6th
century BC.
San was a letter of the Greek alphabet, between
Pi and Qoppa. It had a phonemic value of
/z/, but eventually became disused in favour of sigma. The
latest attested use is in the 6th
century BC.
San was a letter of the Greek alphabet, between Pi and Qoppa. It usually had a phonemic
value of /s/, but eventually became disused in favour of sigma. The
latest attested use is in the 6th
century BC. It was also used in Arcado-Cypriot as [ts], replacing a
previous labio-velar
before a front vowel, where other dialects replaced it with Tau.
San was a letter of the Greek alphabet, between Pi and Qoppa, corresponding in position
although not in name to the Phoenician
tsade. It usually had a phonemic value of /s/, but eventually
became disused in favour of sigma. The latest attested use is in the 6th century BC. It was also used in
Arcado-Cypriot
as [ts], replacing a previous labio-velar before a
front vowel, where other dialects replaced it with Tau.
San was a letter of the Greek alphabet, appearing between Pi and Qoppa in alphabetical order,
corresponding in position although not in name to the Phoenician tsade.
It usually had a phonemic value of /s/,
but eventually became disused in favour of sigma. The
latest attested use is in the 6th
century BC. It was also used in Arcado-Cypriot as [ts], replacing a previous labio-velar
before a front vowel, where other dialects replaced it with Tau.
San (uppercase Ϻ, lowercase ϻ) was a letter of the Greek alphabet,
appearing between Pi and Qoppa in
alphabetical order, corresponding in position although not in
name to the Phoenician tsade. It usually had a phonemic value of /s/, but eventually became disused
in favour of sigma.
The latest attested use is in the 6th
century BC. It was also used in Arcado-Cypriot as [ts], replacing a previous labio-velar
before a front vowel, where other dialects replaced it with Tau.
San (uppercase Ϻ, lowercase ϻ) was a letter of the Greek alphabet,
appearing between Pi and Qoppa in
alphabetical order, corresponding in position although not in
name to the Phoenician Tsade
. It usually had a phonemic value of /s/, but eventually became disused
in favour of sigma.
The latest attested use is in the 6th
century BC. It was also used in Arcado-Cypriot as [ts], replacing a previous labio-velar
before a front vowel, where other dialects replaced it with Tau.
The Phoenician or the Greek letter was loaned into the Old Italic
alphabets (𐌑, transcribed as Ś), in the archaic Etruscan
alphabet retaining its M-shape but from the 6th century BC
changing its aspect to a shape similar to that of the d-rune ᛞ.
San (uppercase Ϻ, lowercase ϻ) was a letter of the Greek alphabet,
appearing between Pi and Qoppa in
alphabetical order, corresponding in position to the Phoenician Tsade
, but its name comes from Shin. It usually had a phonemic value of /s/, but eventually became disused
in favour of sigma.
The latest attested use is in the 6th
century BC. It was also used in Arcado-Cypriot as [ts], replacing a previous labio-velar
before a front vowel, where other dialects replaced it with Tau.
The Phoenician or the Greek letter was loaned into the Old Italic
alphabets (𐌑, transcribed as Ś), in the archaic Etruscan
alphabet retaining its M-shape but from the 6th century BC
changing its aspect to a shape similar to that of the d-rune
.
San (uppercase Ϻ, lowercase ϻ) was a letter of the Greek alphabet,
appearing between Pi and Qoppa in
alphabetical order, corresponding in position to the Phoenician Tsade
, but its name comes from Shin. It usually had a phonemic value of /s/, but eventually became disused
in favour of sigma.
The latest attested use is in the 6th
century BC. With a somewhat different shape (which has
been labelled "Tsan"[1])
the letter was also used in Arcado-Cypriot as [ts], replacing a previous labio-velar
before a front vowel, where other dialects replaced it with Tau.
The Phoenician or the Greek letter was loaned into the Old Italic
alphabets (𐌑, transcribed as Ś), in the archaic Etruscan
alphabet retaining its M-shape but from the 6th century BC
changing its aspect to a shape similar to that of the d-rune
.
oh, at last, a reference, but it's dead there, and it's probably
nothing. And it's only 2003 to 2007,
this
random discussion, a scientific discussion, because editiors could
only read it in more or less scientific literature, and everyboy
who knew anything about it could have its say. Imagine giving
references to the fact that S sounds as s. I probably wouldn't.
But if you read that M sounds as s, I would like to see some
reference to that. What book does say about it first? In what
text, ancient or modern is it used this way? Probably some greek
dialect used it and thus they recognized some ancient abecedary in
the way, but then I would liike to look inside that dialect and
why could that ever happen that M's mistaken for Σ
M stands above S in roman alphabet and above Σ in greek too and
where romans had Y, greeks used Ψ.
But let's procede with this experiment, omitting some minor
edition (some1 put lent instead of loaned)
notice how 1(one) and l(L) are almost the
same. as if 1 is il, el, al
So I go on, and thought I never heard of Tsan, there's another
line about it:
The
Tsan variant has a glyph identical to the Pamphylian Greek digamma, U+0376 U+0377, which is scheduled
for inclusion in Unicode 5.1.
I couldn't find pamphylian alphabet, but I brought you Lycian:
Mostly to show how much some of its letters remind runes.
and that lycian omega surprisingly reminds northern paleohispanic
m.
as they're quite different phonetically, I suppose some semantic
calque, like Ma & Она
and I continue observing how one wiki
article grew with time:
San (uppercase Ϻ, lowercase ϻ) was a letter of the Greek alphabet,
appearing between Pi and Qoppa in
alphabetical order, corresponding in position to the Phoenician Tsade
, but its name comes from Shin
. It usually had a phonemic value of /s/, but eventually became disused
in favour of sigma.
The latest attested use is in the 6th
century BC. With a somewhat different shape (which has
been labelled "Tsan"[1])
the letter was also used in Arcado-Cypriot as [ts], replacing a previous labio-velar
before a front vowel, where other dialects replaced it with Tau.
The Phoenician or the Greek letter was lent into the Old Italic
alphabets (𐌑, transcribed as Ś), in the archaic Etruscan
alphabet retaining its M-shape but from the 6th century BC
changing its aspect to a shape similar to that of the d-rune
.
San (uppercase Ϻ, lowercase ϻ) was a letter of the Greek alphabet,
appearing between Pi and Qoppa in
alphabetical order, corresponding in position to the Phoenician Tsade
, but its name comes from Shin
. It usually had a phonemic value of /s/, but eventually became disused
in favour of sigma.
The latest attested use is in the 6th
century BC. With a somewhat different shape (which has
been labelled "Tsan"[1])
the letter was also used in Arcado-Cypriot as [ts], replacing a previous labio-velar
before a front vowel, where other dialects replaced it with Tau.
The Phoenician or the Greek letter was lent into the Old Italic
alphabets (𐌑, transcribed as Ś), in the archaic Etruscan
alphabet retaining its M-shape but from the 6th century BC
changing its aspect to a shape similar to that of the d-rune
.
The obsolete Greek letter sampi (ϡ = 900),
either derives from or was influenced by san, both having
similar phonetic values.
San (uppercase Ϻ, lowercase ϻ) was a letter of the Greek alphabet,
appearing between Pi and Qoppa in
alphabetical order, corresponding in position to the Phoenician Tsade
, but its name comes from Shin
. It usually had a phonemic value of /s/, but eventually became disused
in favour of sigma.
The latest attested use is in the 6th
century BC. With a somewhat different shape (which has
been labelled "Tsan"[1])
the letter was also used in Arcado-Cypriot as [ts], replacing a previous labio-velar
before a front vowel, where other dialects replaced it with Tau.
The Phoenician or the Greek letter was lent into the Old Italic
alphabets (𐌑, transcribed as Ś), in the archaic Etruscan
alphabet retaining its M-shape but from the 6th century BC
changing its aspect to a shape similar to that of the d-rune
.
The obsolete Greek letter sampi (ϡ = 900)
may have derived from san and both represent similar sibilants.
![](III_files/tsan.png)
And then it was
reedited
in some other form, so I stopped following
and I looked at the comments of those editors instead, though they
still don't give references, it's still rather informative:
Also since then tsan was called arcadian, and not arcado-cypriot.
and
that
(the same San) article has several
references, probably I should read them if I want to research this
topic properly.
Ͷ ͷ (this letter
has some other interpretations, and some other letters look like
that:
И &
𐐥)
I am russian I learn all the time, yet I never knew Ͷͷ or that
digamma can look like this
I'm lazy to mirror links, I put a piece of
that right here:
(I must mirror all the links for whatever
reason)
Arcadian "Tsan"
A unique letter variant, shaped
(similar to modern Cyrillic
И, but with a slight leftward bend)[5]
has been found in a single inscription in the Arcado-Cypriot
dialect of Mantineia, Arcadia, a 5th century BC[2]
inscription dedicated to Athena Alea (Inscriptiones Graecae
V.ii.262)[6][7]
It is widely assumed to be a local innovation based on San,
although Jeffery (1961) classes it as a variant of Sigma.[5]
It appears to have denoted a /ts/ sound and has been
labelled "Tsan" by some modern writers.[6]
In the local Arcadian dialect, this sound occurred in words
that reflect Proto-Greek */kʷ/. In such words,
other Greek dialects usually have /t/, while the related
Cypriot dialect has /s/. Examples are:
- ИΙΣ (cf. Attic τις, 'somebody')
- ИΙΝΑ (cf. Attic τινα, 'somebody')
- ΟИΕΟΙ (cf. Attic ὅτῳ 'to whomever')
- ΕΙИΕ (cf. Attic εἴτε 'either')
From these correspondences, it can be
concluded that the letter most likely denoted an affricate sound,
possibly [ts] or [tʃ], which would have
been a natural intermediate step in the sound change from */kʷ/ to /s/.[2]
The letter has been represented in modern scholarly
transcriptions of the Mantinea inscription by <ś> (s
with an acute accent) or by <σ̱> (sigma with a macron
underneath).[6]
(A distinct epichoric letter that shared the
same И shape with Arcadian Tsan but had the unrelated sound
value of /w/ existed in yet another dialect, in Pamphylia. It is conventionally
known as "Pamphylian
digamma", i.e. a variant of Digamma or Waw.)
Sampi (Disigma)
The Ionian letter
, which later gave rise to
the numeral symbol Sampi
(ϡ = 900) may also be historically related to San, although
it did not have the same alphabetic position.[8]
2. Woodard, Roger D. (2006). "Alphabet". In
Wilson, Nigel Guy (ed.). Encyclopedia of ancient Greece. London:
Routldedge. p. 38.
5. Jeffery, Local scripts, p.212f.
6. Nicholas, Nick (2005). "Proposal to add Greek epigraphical
letters to the UCS" (PDF). Retrieved 2010-08-12.
7. "PHI Greek Inscriptions: IB V,2 262". Retrieved 2010-08-12.
8. Jeffery, Local scripts, p. 38f.
Okay, it's not my book already, I give references to books I never
opened, but I just copied references of what I copied here. I
never saw anybody did it (though they just didn't tell me, they
copied references from the book they read, even if they didn't
read those referenced books. I think hyperlinked text is better
than list of references, more user-friendly, new.
Also links to public domain works instead of corrupt academic
references easily puts me aside, as I wanna be, move along, это не
для вас написано.
I think it's time to take a hiatus until I have some news. Not to
stumble around sans & tsadis.
But I have the news all teh time, I have some in my notebooks, I
tried to deliver it here, but I got distracted all the time.
It's about
צ ~
Q ~
Ч being
the same letter or at least invariants:
San, Sigma, Sampi, could these be 666 of the greek alphabet? UVW
is in latin, ъЫь is in russian, probably three ways to read
ו is in jewish, for
ו
is their 6th letter, for
ו can be read as
v, u, o.
de Vuo? I only know the word vow consisting of these three, and
it's a magical word.
Previous boooks ended as christian bible, it's funny that this
topic arised as I spoke of ending this
No, lazybones, we're going to keep on going.
I wonder how I never noticed that arabic و looks like roman
cursive v.
it would look much more like it if it bound to the letter
following to the left of it, but it is one of those letters you're
not allowed to bind to the followings. Otherwise it stops being
wow or what? probably.
Or just to prevent us from noticing this samenloop. I wrote in
english, I wrote in russian. Now I will give way for Dutch. Not
only to show off, but mostly to learn it properly, for bog ik zog
way is weg in nederlandse taal. maar boy is not bog, does it make
weg less of a way? away is weg too.
say is seg
thus rule shouldn't appear all the time, but it is a
tool or event which could take place
several times, as if instead of one word some other people loaned
a couple of similars and twisted them both
e
the sam
we
but some similar words are so many that you know those might be
the originals, because notheing is more to the core of the
language than they are. So they could be even saying more. So sort
out the basics from later additions and compare them semantically.
I am a native russian, so I will use russian to find those semes,
and after taht I will compare them to other languages. I will see
for correlations or whatever comes my way.
аси баси вези гаси дерзи
еси ёси жись
зисъ ищи коси лоси мощи
неси оси паси рощи соси туси усы
фасы хоти цвети чади щади
беси весь
льсти мости
пёсьи рости
фаты
цеди
it seems like -си is the older version of -ти
(because y-row is the latest)
but do all those older letters have -ти words to them?
аси баси вези гаси дерзи
еси ёси жись
зисъ ищи коси лоси мощи
неси оси паси рощи соси туси усы
фасы хоти цвети чади щади
беси весь
льсти мости
пёсьи рости
фаты
цеди
бати
води гадь дади едь жди
зуди иди кодь льды муди надей(ся) пади ряди
сади туды уды
гадай
лги манди
instead of дади we say дай!
бей вей гадай дай жуй знай куй лей мой ной рой стой а
дальше только хуй и чуй
подобно тому как г похоже на что-то согнутое, есть более
подхадящее этой букве слово: гни
пни вне гни дни жни знай know лени(сь)? но я имел в виду лини
(императив от слова "лить")
(ебани)
мни! нни? является ли этот суффикс частицей не/ни? но я думал это
про -си (вези = не в карете)
пни рани сани тани, тяни!
а дальше лишь еврейской фани и хани хны
цены. цени кстати! чаны, шаны, но это не глаголы
бесы = б
ог
съ
ехал (съебал
если то же самое, да позвонче)
бесишь = быть перестанешь (бога прогневишь. взгляни в начало этой
части или конец прошлой, где бог сочетается с жизнью как дьявол со
смертию.
это arbitrary, but that is what the culture saw or was
весить = вылазить, свисать. т.е. "не внутри" и видимо лишь в
дальнейшем, когда взвешивать стали пружинными весами, подвешивая
мясо или мешки на крюк, висеть стало означать и весить.
гаси =
ог
онь
с
носи
ть
(то же с что и в приставке/предлоге с) а г то же что и в гарь,
горе(ть) огонь
дась - ни разу не видел такой формы, видел даждь, знаю дать, но
именно это слово велело мне изучить ещё более простой суффикс -й,
и если -й = -си, то
... как мы гуманитарии
используем минус это просто непростительное несоответствие, хотя
бомжет.. может и информационно для понимания истории этих
значков.
дай = нету (т.е. отрицание "да" т.е. констатация факта
подразумевала действие и вместо отрицательных преффикосов
использовались отрицательные суффиксы, смело и свежо братан)
ей = без смеха = еси
жуй = не жёваное
куй = не твёрдое или не острое, не ки, не меч.. нековано, куй
лей = не мокрое
мой = не мытое
ной = не надо?
пой = не просто?
рой = не рыхло?
суй = не снаружи?
тай = не твердей?
дей как форма да, в
противовес нет? словно раньше были
отрицательные глаголы, а затем новым слоем появились
утвердительные?
откуда я это направление взял? just a thought
хуй = не хочу?
хуй иногда значит нет (забавно что пизда есть рифма с да)
но мы забыли про -си!
коси = ко
лос с
неси
уноси = не
надо here's where I
recognize bs. why don't I use some monosyllables?
:but I keep on going
мости = чтоб не мокнуть делай!
значит в "мочи" -чи = -ти, т.е. да.
не случайно в японском ч есть форма т, тогда как ш,щ есть форма с
значит -щи = -си
ищи = нету (и = is, но is = есть (exist) т.е. е=и (едА вместо идА
и ищИ вместо ещИ - "стилистика")
была М снесена со своего места подобной неаккуратностью, когда я
сначала незнаю что про него сказать, но вдруг узрел и добавил
паси (чтоб не пропали)
росы (чтоб не погибли? чтоб не засохли, чтоб
не рухнули)
соси (не кусай? шин = зуб, со = зуб?)
туси - это непосредственно мне совет, not to overdo it, to
socialize, to be less autistic.
but of course this word is probably rather relative, though even
though this word is from youths' slang, it could have much more
deeper roots: тусовать ~ тасовать. тусуй! в значении тассуй
колоду. похоже на французское заимствование, не тусуй, а тасуй
правильная форма, но кто её установил. тусоваться это именно что
переходить от одной компании к другой, везде находя старых и новых
знакомых. туси значит развейся, снеси этот ту-ту-ду-ду-ту блюз,
cheer up!
характерно, что глаголы, что я счёл древними, закончились на т,
как алфавит оканчивался раньше
но это фрикота конечно в академически заведениях не
простиительная, потому что не все же такие крутые как ты, начнут
нести ахинею и стройное-нестройное, какое есть, здание языкознания
рухнет под весом собственных противоречий. Так может и не нужно
единое здание для всех школ? пусть падают противоречивые
конструкции, пусть подобно тому как природа решает такие вопросы
выживут самые самые.
здание=знание? о...
What is going here and what was just above would be embarrassing
for any affiliated researcher.
Good thing I am not affiliated, so I can demonstrate freely how
the thought process is happening.
к = твёрдое? камень, кость. даже придлог к подразумевает твёрдость
(не в, но к)
тогда кость это именно твёрдая ось, в отличие от хрящей (os =
кость. ost = кость in context)
But I remember another interpretation of
that -си suffix: as if -си = -ся
then коси = к себе
and неси = на себе
and both of these make some sense, but other words won't support
this thing.
doesn't it bother me that si is yes in other languages? It doesn't
bother me that bulgarian gestures to yes an no are the opposite of
ours. I never really researched if it was true or just an urban
legend, but here's an interpretation of mine:
волгарам проще говорить нет просто прижав морду к добыче.
или трясутся, играются у довольствии.
если нет тэла - то как фарфорчик китайский ла лэ
рысски же дрессируют хвыстом.
или изгибают спинку у довольствии.
если нет хлоста - то страшно наверно, трясутся, сътрясно
k & to are the
same letter: ᛏ
k is just downwards. or sidewards or what is
it? ⏎? nah
K is literally "to" < is <= (arrow & less or equal.
before the object or just at it. compare at & to)
>= this one is probably "in" the object, because it's more or
equal, which as at it or in it.
що ис ши ин (why did I write ши? in ши это раскладкаю .. могли
древние иметь раскладки?
почему одни слова соответствуют другим.::?
= is ровно (равно ис ровно. две равные палки рядом лежат)
драка дразнить
so people of the past didn't see problem that k is z
or is it people of the present pronounce words so poetically
carelessly, that linguals go all the ways.
нить (she in chinese or japanese)
ню
нетъ (he (or actually she) in дразнет (дразнит) and НЕ is ne
(no) in russian and he in english)
ни
?
these he & she in дразнитъ (if ъ ~ ь then make me
think it was the infinite form)
infinite indefinite the same as in infinity, eternity, godliness,
purity, so thinking of those кто оскопили себя ради царствия
божиего, did they know that male glands (glans) spoil blood after
man is 50 or so
I'm a little over 40 and I already feel it (and I read it in
Дильман's 4 Mодели Mедицины)
but how could savages of the past know iit? they probably wasn't
that savage ((even me is savage)
they could notice something happening with the corpse, what if
that thing allowed them not to rot?
unlikely? just as a possible variant. They could avoid rotting by
living in draft, but their craft could demand castration as
protection from marital bounds with its inevitable retardation.
there's an anecdote: психолог спрашивает пциента "а это как вы
сказали потупление случилось с вами внезапно или развилось
постепенно в связи с женитьбой и последующим отцовством?"
though I'm not sure this anecdote is not a part of the white
genocide.
motherfuckers
what if this distinct from all the incest thing could be a
national trait, as cocksuckers could be antisemitic, if it relates
to mezizah b'peh
You may think "here he again, why cannot he curve around this
thing? who cares, move along! and socially adequate person would
behave accordingly, but teenagers misbehave for a reason;
without deviation from a norm, progress is impossible.
or let's respell this cast:
progress is due to change
change makes progress
progress by change
control the change and you control the progress
some changes are made not by us
let's make text of shorter words
a be see do if go hi I key all am me no on in oh pee que are as is
os to two
joe is jow, suffixed
word
then new is among n's
It's funny that it begins with a and ands with two
and now I see where new & cue (queue, que) came from (cue
указка, кто именно. или длинное)
new & que came from you. the new vowel.
imkl
because vowel, labial, velar, coronal, as in a & o lines (e
& u lines show this structure less, yet they do)
j ~ y ~ v ~ u ~ и ~ n ~ g ~ q
how dows this relate to i?
it relates to f.. weeird, so weird
f as wow, for vov is bothe u & v & o...
but two lines ago I said it because f is digamma, and way ~
weg and g ~ q
but I added ~ n ~ g ~ q only to say that you que new are the
same word
you and que I can understand, you show with it at one from the
crowd saying you,
but you is plural form. thee is ты but verb form of ты is
тыкать. which is related to a cue.
cue = thee?
if к = зн = ж = г
all linguals are the same
at least all the basic, primal, ancient linguals.
n is new. thus g is new thus q is new
what was e-line's lingual if not g?
did e-line exist then?
because there's no velar in a-line of ancient runes (plot all you
like but even before I saw that abc-structure of a-line in
bornholm stone is more basic than anywhere else (maybe ugaritic
u-line, which shows the youth of u-line in comparison to others,
which already developed som clasters, and i-line even misplaced M,
as they all do. So why do I treat a-line & u-line differently?
because a-line is everywhere, u-line is not.
what are these verses? it isn't even poetry, and it is between
scientific literature and poetic wanderment,
a new genre. genre is direction (both words are направление in
russian) so I whether made poetry more scientific or made science
more poetic, or both.
back to those motherfuckers: won't people prefer to reproduce with
their parents if science makes it safe? will people make new
breeds by these practice? why would you multiply? to make my own
tribe. why? what for? to be the king of your castle? can any
family demand independence from the feodals? (robot want's to
substitute it with federals, lol)
I sperg
Iceberg
just a rhyme, but some semantic similarity
ist here
I recently noticed that I live in a region where many tatars &
bashkirs & I still hardly destinguish their zur rahmat from
rahat lukum
(I had a typo of harman.. harmat there, can
it measn anything. not, forget these typos, paitn noise white)
This is because I can recognize russian words in english, but not
in turkic languages.
Which makes me believe that nations are divided not only by facial
features, but also by language.
And it seems these two characteristics are related to one another.
Finns & Hungarians look more similar to us, so let's approach
turkic languages from finno-ugric, for now I test my picture of
the world claiming that finno-ugric are closer to indo-european
than turkinc.
turkic is tengric? u and en both could be yuses (юсы, nasal
sounds)
нос нёс несу несёшь несётъ несёты (т.н. число от несётъ, несёте
russian orthography didn't understand grammar)
oh my god, thinking of rosenthahl being european who first opened
russian at 16 or so (or did he learn it before, I'm not sure, he
came to russia at the age of 16, parents didn't talk russian, but
listen to the story) imagine being european living in russia. who
will you pledge the allegence? russia or europe? at least some of
them are more likely to work in the sake of europe, and
at least some of them will be doing it by
damaging russia. navos na qotorom groizrostayut drugie narody. so
I just explained healthy necessity of nationalism. and if both
rosenthal and vasmer were european foreigners, russia lost the
first world war. Russia participated in a war against Germany.
Little did it know that that war was against both germany &
russia. We were allies with Germany before, so Brits seduced us
with their awesomeness, so after russia liked french (until the
war) so we began liking english, for german we liked before, it
was too old-fashioned. And english is objectively prettier, even
Swedes speak English more.
So brits used russian public to make russian government change
sides, and then they slayed as a traitor.
Rusy trusy. and duracy. two races? true si(la)? If chinese have
hieroglyphs almonosillabary, rusi is two hieroglyphs: true &
sila
давай проверим это:
но тогда бриты руссы, а руссы бриты. Потому что английский похож
на русский больше чем немецкий.
morrow tomorrow (morning is a newer form of morrow, which is still
present in poetry)
утро заутро (завтра)
than deutsche morgen morgen (though
нутром утром
(нутром будущего?) can be synonym of
завтрa)
Thus it is a discovery: english is closer to russian, though it's
heographically farther)
Ирландцы-шотладнцы к нам ещё ближе (оне произносят р как мы)
произносит1i
произносят2a
so this is the grammatically correct order, i a w (or E? I was
thinking of E when I recalled 3 mothers) that a also looks like
cursive 2.
i is higher than both a & w, w is the lowest, thus it was
written vertically.
IMK(?)
ABC
UVШ
Hooray, I think I just found the 9-letter alphabet, the one which
was used for calculation, until they forgot the rule to use
strokes above letters to make bigger numbers, as I researched in
roman numerals, I suppose it was due to some long period of
scarcity, where people had to move and they didn't have many of
anything with them. Jewish history could be universal scenario,
and it could allow them merge their christian culture with local
pagan believes, as if christians enriched them. And it could be
happening not only with jewish torah (which remained thus
unchanged, while heathens got centralized religion
Русы друзы (друзья) two races brought me this.
ук ~ ж
лукав ~ лжив
горе луковые ~ голе липовое
лук липок? сочен, лущим
ый (в отличие
от несочной деревяшки. несеченой, нечесаной)
эта поэзия омонопэтична ономопоэтична омномном
when I smoked extract of salvia, finally it told me не осквернять
храм своего тела непонятно чем
когда я покурил её ещё раз через несколько лет, я увидел белую
богиню, спросившую меня
"ты чего пришёл, тебе же всё объяснили" я ей "но ты мне нравишься"
она такая (закатя глаза, на 90
о отвернулась своими
делами заниматься)
закатя закатав
закатывают обае (оба, обе, обои обоим нравятся, обои ободряют
одобряют)
So the question is "is this wisdom applied to cannabis?" for if I
didn't smoke it, woodn't write this book.
Salvia made me build all that concrete insanity in my flat. And
this book is much more.. sane.
Cannabis is not "непонятно че")
My thulean friend told me "на кортах-то не
сиди!"
а мы с урала урловатые, угловатые, uglier, wilder
those latter two are nothing but poetry,
ingore, ignore
Вокруг города ров с водой. ров is river. (та кто делает ров. рыва)
потому в крутых городах муниципалитет на острове стоит.
So what is russia? it's дружные и грусные, русаки и рысаки и
рыськи и лисоньки и росы и леса
depending on pron
ounciation
and dialect
rus is also village in latin. is there no dew (росы) in the city?
not as in forest. there can be иней though.
rosia it used to be, roses. rosы (шипастые тоже, шипящие, цчшщ)
who cares what is russia, some part of me wants me to say that all
nations must go, but I know that bearded man in gits is russian,
how do I know it? am I delusional? I never saw official info on
him, but I see my own
nwe onw one on archetiype.
wizard is wees art
wees is knows in dutch
how many such transliterated words unrecognized because nobody
knows languages
I shouldn't have taken drinks from women, they are all witches,
that wi in women is the same as in wim
that guy I met on academia is Wim, and a weird surname, it
probably trained his mind in the field of letters, just as mind
(mine) did to mine.(to my mind)
That is fascinating that I found his name in female departure, for
Dmitrij is also d'Mitrы
(official etymology
is Demetry (belonging to Demetra, who is Mother deity. dice
could be related to this word) Mitra is Mother and she is
definitely waking up! (in case you missed that secret level in
volume 1, I figured out that Alexander d'Makedonia made greeks
shave their mugs to convince them that Mitra is a guy. gay mafia
fucked us over, good thing is information wants to be free and
they're revealed from all the fronts, though they probably keep
some secret trick in the rear. and though they shouldn't care too
much for this movements wants to keep them safe and in
tact, just off their power structure, you
think it is an option? would they crush the civilization to keep
this ape status quo instead? what can you offer them? power of
gods, but for everyone. even for retards? do you
dind find this solution sustainable? I
find it can be sustainable if everybody is looking for everyone
and taking care of problems before they happen. so we should trace
the radioactivity, chemical & biological activity both
globally and locally, new forms of human society should be built
as multi-level fortresses to ensure survival of human
civilization. chances are technologies will find it safer to build
underground bases in the martian caves. we have to be prepared to
evacuate there or elsewhere, but it's the best option to save life
and civilization on the surface of the earth, and second best
option is in the underground of the earth and somewhere else,
other options are disputable. So why do I consider it possible for
shit to hit the fan? Because there's such possibility by default
and our task is to prevent it. So why do I want to change the
status quo? It's already changed, and keeps on changing, what I
offer here is the safe outcome for all of us actually, not for the
most but for the special few too. so tell me more gorgie boy, tell
me more.)
It's fascinating that I wished to be able to write science
fiction, which would take this reality and turns it inside out so
you don't know if it's true or not, but the longer you look into
it, the more it is true. And now I'm writing this very thing, and
it is even better than science fiction, it's a scientific
research. And this part speaking of something out of my
speciality, what is that? that is not the most insane part of the
book actually. And it is probably even more important than the
rest of the book inself: if civilization falls, this obscure text
is lost forever, unless I print it on some good cannabis paper or
on some stone wall deep below where it will be found when they
raise again high enough to care about archaeology.
Or is it archaeology? for I just less than a couple of hours ago
thought that -sophy is wisdom, while -logy is lies. Yet if it once
was true, since after then we got biology which is a very true
science, this definition is whether obsolete or never existed. I
will return to that civilization topic, it was not the first time
I raised it.
We мы - are these female pronouns? Then what would be make
counterparts?
I ego (его is third person of the same word, as be goes sideways
of am is are, and if orthography confuses you, recognize M S A in
them, who are three mothers, and forms of B, which is an invariant
of M
What are the three mothers of T?
to? at? tea? tie? none of M S A is B
thus T should be present in some other forms
the? who as Wo? Wo Is I We so B's are verbs, and T are... turds?
Be adn Do!!!
What are the three forms of Do?
Be, being V (beta is actually vita, if historians disagree, these
tradition could go forth and back, as ф & θ did) goes in
three:
Be aM Was and is Were or Willbe the fourth secret one? Will is
probably another word and were is the answer? I should have used
quotation mards on those words, but let they be a riddle for your
mind.
As if this work isn't complicated enough. Let it be not
complicated enough for you. evolve my mam(n)
man is belonging to ma, just as Mitry is belonging to Mutr, -y is
-g is -n (more about it later)
wim is probably related to wit & wiz & wink & we may
Mitry is May I Try, a very male thing to say. -le is in that very
morphosemantic claster of -y -g -n
not only because lambda looks like gimel, but also because I found
other reasons why they're the same, and here male is synonym of
man, and -le is such
![](img/251.png)
a common suffix (and working in this
function) that the sign of suffix is something like ^ which is
directly similar to Λ which is L
and forms of L & Λ makes me think of abugidas, where have I
saw such a thing other than in ancient greek music? I should
scroll my volumes to see if I ever met them somewhere other than
in aborigianl canadian sillabary, but L & Λ are the same
letter, just as ᚦ & Д are. or even ᚦ & d. bustrophaedon
made them equal, or is it some deeper part of the fractal? for b
used to look the other way (see roman cursive, or I will rather
repeat them here, for I neglet images more and more, that is not
as it should have been.
Compare that b from the third line and below. Also notice how D is
sibilar to jewish cursive ט.
sibilar instead of similar. oh boy, am I even sue this work won't
give me dislexia?
Of course I'm not sure, but I wil definitely find my way out of
it.
At least it's a goal. though you know how they say "tell your
plans to god if you want to make him or her laugh" for now it
seems god knows better, because as for those plans of mine
according to which it doesn't happen, reality turns into something
even better: I don't build my autonomous house in the woods far
away, but I got yes to build it closer to where I actually live,
closer to where specialists in medicine and documentaries can be
found. And all the other plans turn out into the best possible
ways, as one of my best friends say, всё совершается
совершеннейшим образом.
Suddenly, giving refernce to a book is misleading for
search bots and thus foir all of us.
(I hope after some fo thisese words go memetic, atntropologists
recognizye my aphasia.
And all of the sudden I recognize how to cure aphasia. a pupil
should watch what he wrote and to correct it as we all do.
Aphasians just don't give shit. Just as me.
Положительный человек - тот на которого можно положиться?
Отрицательный отрицает? Отринет, отрицает(ся) мол я не я, и
никакой ответственности не несёт.
(т.е. ничего не положить(ся) - украдёт (дес ка?()
I should have put in the beginning that I am orry for all the
trash I put in this book. A good editior would save me form the
most of those mistakes. I was unhappy with my editors when they
were right.
I had good editiors, I never understood their necessity until this
very moment.
And this part wasn't even edited by myself. Only first half of
volume 1 is mostly rewritten from a draft. Though I made
interventions and it was as free and poetic as these. I think it's
what I wanted to read when I was looking for published drafts of
great people. It seems drafts were never published. We must scan
and index those drafts too. I'm pretty sure traces of my work are
present in there for many times, but they didn't managed to
decypher abcd through, so they couldn't publish it.
So it advocates my wild and savage way of publishing my own drafts
even if they include raw meat of uncertain genes.
Though I just recently cut out a dirty little schmuck about
politics and what just followed instead of this text I also cut
out, not even saving it in cutout.html.,.
sayin is aving? having and saving? raving! what is it my dear?
rave is not only the rave, but also a form of speech, ffurious
bubbleing
waving can be also a form of speech. waying? wave=way! way=wave.
- is = in grammar. probably only normal if ≡ exists.
and when it's minus we only take from the group as many objects of
the same objects which are in the bigger group (I fourgot all
those mathematical terms and have no internet now)
5-3-2
машина - 4 колеса - 1 кузов
I don't understand it, I think i'm trippin;' or was I trippin
before?
My friend sent me link to ogham. So bad, he doesn't read my book.
So good, he really cares.
And it is a link to the right direction. Wth am I тут устроил!
\
![](III_files/1280px-Oghamalfabet.svg.png)
oh now I see what he wanted to say.
Don't look at distracting 5th ...not aet, ogham has some other
term. So this division into groups is essential and known to many
peoples under different names.
(please look for int into internets, I don't have internet. India
shas vargas, North has aettir, West has some other name for it,
and who knows what other nations have or had.
Back to Ogham: B & H reflect eachother, as b is form of h in
japanese, thus maybe this system is from such ancient times, that
japans contacted normans. We noticed it in the beginning, when we
(this academic tradition fucks me up, leave it, reject, resist ---
rrefuse resist hiperlink)
D & L reflect b & h by thir position in ancient roman
alphabet, weherhe were neither J nor K.
And D stands above H
So probably b & d are initial. and just as vowels are in a
different order, but the common 5 they are,
thus D is double & b is single. Мужики в основном с бабами, а
бабы были чаще одиноки (мужиков было гораздо меньеше если они на
хохотах погибали, воевали, и т.д)
Бабу проще
убить, но зачем её бить, пусть кушать готовит, да пизду даёт.
Старух наверное их старые любовники защищали (кто-нибудь бы да
выжил. Но зачем это старикам? стариков шестерили небось. Ведь
все эти этикеты про уважайте старших и баб, это же хитрость,
подкуб избереателесь,... вырежи это!!!!
Мay be that is whey we have both bi-lingual & di-g
ramma for those words appeared
in different cultures. B baby (бабы) что ходят парами. & Д as
aDin. oNe? ad In?
no D is in du, ДВэ
сравни с оДин
одному нужен -ин ибо мужские слоги закрыте, оД = оN, [od = on] ood
ин is universal suffix:
oD-
in
a
dV-
oina
thor is the name of the third letter. which is D again. And it
expalains why d looks like a in its many forms.
when it bacame abcd, thor became forth, and thus four, fourth,
though Четыре (tells that ᚴ could be fourth.
How is it possible? ᚴ could reflect ᛅ (or is it ᚾ?) as ᚦ reflected
ᛆ
for it seems to be just two letters going all over one after
antoher.
What an wild assuption! Especially since ᚾ goes just after ᚦ
could it be
dad mom dad
dad mom dad mom
This is a freaky part, please scroll further,
it's getting better
dad mom dad mom dad
dad mom dad mom dad mom
Ooh! I didn't know they were такой же лесенкой как еврейский.
Я хотел закончить эту работу (по ряду причин.) и вот я заканчиваю
её потому что Composer глючит, так же как и когда я закончил
второй том (и может первый, но этого не помню)
И это странно, потому что второй том вчетверо больше, а комп тот
же самый.
Рано отвлекаться на руны, расскажи ещё про
огам.
lol
pater || П & palms
f & t отражают друг друга (как и в латинском минускуле)
palms? he from south
c & s отражают друг друга (как и в k-симметрии латинского
архаичного)
n & q отражают друг друга, и это могло поставить меня в тупик
до того, как я поместил две эти буквы в один кластер чувть выше.
и n & q ис ориджинал third letter, because I saw ogham named
as beth luis noin. So it's the third consonant, c. N = Z? c, s, z,
are all these letters, and there are some more.
I probably saw it, noticed it, but I fourgot about it when I wrote
this. Z is an invariant of S & C
q make 4 & 5 invariants. is it why four & five begin with
F? is it why it's digamma? Because NG is the third letter, that
n&Q 3, 4, 5, we got, you cannot coutn. no, wait, beth luis
nun. NG is that Nun. R is just another new letter they introduced
4 & 5 for.
Vowels: I should (or you should) research celtic musical modes, if
they are preserved by some miracle.
Even more obscure things are coming preserved for really some
miractle (miracle fo human devotion. hail humans. hail
civilizqation. we started it (along with bees, ants, some other
animals, probably all the animals, probably before animals, we are
the stage of the same ancient process. and what are we going to
be? who knows, something very high tech. I will be living in a
spheric bath, moving around with surrogate mes
many me
, mes, me's. ye ye we all got it
as when I need to clean a dirty tube, I don't go ther myself, I
ping to mechanical arms with a camera attached to them, and if I
need to go out on some conference I simply activate a dron already
bought by the conference organizers. So I don't risk plain crush,
I don't get humiliated by airport securities, I don't have to pay
for hotel, and for plain too, so maybe we shit with jet fuel less,
please. now it is really boiliing, The program doesn't want to
work. I have a breakthrough but in another field. TOt ziens.
But it keeps on coming:
So I must keep on:
That Wim Borsboom made a good work recently. He found literature
which speaks about that vowel-labial-velar-coronal he also found.
It's been an explosion in the field recently. They same time I
published on the internet, a
patent
(
mirror) on the name of Nancy
Beth Orr appeared, and at least two other articles:
1. Wim Borsboom "Reverse Engineering the Western Alphbaet. The
Western Abecedary and the Pre-Sanskrit Abugida Compared" Arnava
refereed journal Vol.VI No.1year:2017 ISSN 2320-0103
https://1drv.ms/w/s!ApyK8scKyCqRgZEQbD700IYu4sRp_w
(
mirror)
which mentions the four sources which follow:
2. Rajendra Gupta "DNA of words" (2012)
http://dnaofwords.blogspot.com/2012/01/normal-0-false-false-false-en-in-x-none.html
(
mirror)
and though he
All these three (just as Bj`o'rk's anno
uncement
at Webby's in May 21, 2012) could be
provoked by a Breaking B
ad serie,
first shown at October 9, 2011 because I remember how I panicked
when I saw how it told me to hurry, I think I even made myself
forget I saw it to keep the research alive. Little did I know,
keep on reading.
3. Laksman S.Wakankar's ”Ganesh Vidya - The traditional Indian
approach to PhoneticWriting”. (1968)
https://www.scribd.com/document/39087292/Ganesha-Vidya
(
mirror)
4. Waddell, L.A.: 1927, The Aryan Origin of the Alphabet, Luzac
& Co, London
http://library.umac.mo/ebooks/b33333282.pdf
(
mirror)
I found an incredibly interesting paragraph in the Aryan Origins
of Alphabet:
It was long ago noticed that in the Phœnician, Greek and Latin
or Roman alphabets there is a repeated sequence of the letters
as vowels, labials, gutturals and dentals. This sequence is well
displayed by Professor Petrie, in arranging the letters on a
square table like the old "Horn-book" board for teaching
children their ABC.
That his "long ago" reinforces my old belief that it is some
obscure occult knowledge we're researching. So obscure it seems to
be that even occultists themselves have only slightest idea of it.
The last time I met this reference is when I tried to figure out
who noticed first that Carbon has exactly 6 neutrons, 6 protons, 6
electrons. I was told that it's an old thing and everybody knows
it. I believe this chemical knowledge goes back to at least 2500
years ago, when greeks were conceptualizing atoms, in the books
utterly destroyed afterwards, as I said before, and it shines
brighter in the light of
this
video.
Also though I still didn't find that Horn-book of Sir William
Matthew Flinders Petrie, I suppose that those alphabet boards for
autists I shown in vol.1 could represent exactly that, though I
never saw them marked as vowels, labials, gutturals and dentals.
But Waddell actually gives that board he mentioned, and it's
weird, that it diverts from that sequence of vowels, labials,
(velars and coronals)
Though I gave you both links and mirrors, let's have a gallery of
how those guys understood alphabet:
![](III_files/Gupta.png)
and it is the first case I see somebody else
uses the term "lingual", it would be a revelation
for him if he spread this term to the others
actually made by tongue.
Going clockwise, you can see how Wakankar, Gupta & Borsboom
understood this structure.
And as you can see, the Borsboom's representation is way better
than the other
two three.
Though he can have some point there, I should have read his work
more thoroughly, for his initial revelation was much closer to the
one I use:
But he probably diverged from it because of the structure
mentioned by Waddell.
And he's exactly right, the first consonants of B C D reflect the
first syllables of brahmic scripts:
![](III_files/Borsboom...png)
I also spoke about it somewhere,
in the context of Ba standing for Mama (Baba is probably an old
form of Mama, and it requires additional anthropologic research to
find out why in the Middle East baba stands for papa, where did
the word papa come from? Why voiced form is female and voiceless
is male? Is it related to consonants ending with vowels being
considered female, and syllables ending with consonants - male?
Just several paragraphs above I assigned vowels male (because A
looks like Д mostly, but also because they had single stroke upon
stave, I has no strokes, I is the stave. Which probably makes E
prior to I if I stood for empty staff as _ stands for spacebar.
And this mighty man did it independently, by himself, he is so far
the second only to myself in the depth of his thought into this
subject. Good work, man.
It's for such encounters I did my best to keep my work
independent, to compare what I see to what others saw, to know
what is the most essential and true.
I will challenge him to think about the transition as if he
believed that it went not from India to Europe, but the other way
around: Iberians had syllabaries of those BvKkTt too, but
phillippinians
(I really need to find their
ingenious self-nomination) have syllabaries of only 3
vowels, those three common vowels. AIU. But in the light of what I
said, isn't it AEU? No. Why? Because japanese have it as AIUEO,
and their neighbours do too.
Here he combines five forms of syllable to five common vowels:
![](III_files/Borsboom....png)
Which makes sense, since I also combined the common K T P to A I U
for P(pa, pha, ba, bha, ma) all need lips to be pronounced, just
as U does.
for T(ta, tha, da, dha, na) all need tongue to be pronounced, just
as I does.
for K(ka, kha, ga, gha, nga probably, that is some other na,
related to ka) probably can be
prothouth
pron
nounced
with neither lips nor tongue, just as A (as I've shown in the very
beginning, K is also pronounced with tongue, but most of people
think that it's pronounced with throat, so they call it guttural
sometimes. And if dutch g is guttural, I still doubt it, I feel
like I pronounce it with the root of the tongue, but I probably
pronounce it wrong. Either way, a person without tongue will still
be able to say как by coughing, fro cough could be the origin of
the name of the letter kaf.
And his work has other intersting points I still dan't understand
being ignorant from brahmic to hindi.
another thing I planned to announced today is that I found that
bible itself declares god to be goddesses:
This
interesting article (
mirror)
tells that Elohim is literally Goddesses. Gods in bible's hebrew
is Elim. And Eloha is the female form of the word God, i.e.
Goddess. And I surfed the net for this thing and it seems to be
accurate. Also don't forget the riddle John 1:1 i opened with. And
this grammatical interpretation correlates with three mothers of
sefer yetzirah, and all that prechristian paneuropean-and-beyond
belief in tridevi whatever you name it.
And I was thinking of other names ending with ha, other than
sliha, aloha
(I don't knowwhat they mean)
Сноха! Сн is сын? Russian word snoha (daughter in law) is snusa in
sanskrit, which rejuvenates that old topic of h being an invariant
of s
h and in russian blander form of
snoha is snoshennka
(nn is palatalized n)
and a monthly offtopic:
(mirror)
You could see it in my video, where I put it just because why not,
so in case you were wondering wth was that and wtf isn't it on the
site. Now it is. And we went further. I asked my hacker buddy who
helped me with this site to program it into different colours,,
and we saw what we didn't see before:
![](III_files/1556714534219.jpg)
that drift of 5's sierpinski's triangles. I still wonder what
could cause it and what it's all about.
I hope some qualified mathematician is all over this thing at the
moment, because look what they sent me back:
![](III_files/1556753267136.png)
and still nobody knows what it is. It looks like some cell
automata, but I haven'tsen this exact structure among cell
automatae.
Grand [grend] is Great [greit], thus j is n
is g is ng is юс is some sonor prizvuk, kratkoe prilgtlnoe
though I wanted to say kratkaya kak i kratkaya. (and this
n ~ j makes chinese ni more related to je)
At last I found how to think in russwian without switching
keybord back and forth
борода borda lopatoy. lopata and plank can be made of the same
morphemes.
polotno. (I wanted to cut this poetry away, but let it beat)
a [ei] = an [en] is another example of the same invariants.
say = seg, way = weg, ng~y it is. a sonor nasal which went all
around itself over centuries.
An american yesterday told me that his most problem with russian
with our yous: ты & вы
and that is that very ы - I think I will try to explain to him
that it's [i] with tense throat muscles.
(I will edit this part after I see if it helps him)
and these ты вы they are using the same phoneme ы which could
quite be similar to you,
especially because in latin it's vu & tu (or something like
that, in french it's vous & tu)
and that's one of those cases, where v relates to t
(one of which is, don't ask me why uracil
instead of thymine) and it could be the same as b
relates to c.
This contradicts distinction between labials and linguals (the
other such case I remember now is чего read as чево for some
reason russians themselves don't know. and at the same time г ~ л
for
ג ~ λ
it's also lo no go, and it's also why this is unpublishable, it's
raaaw, and will be reedited af.
I met a smart cutie recently, and we were talking about biotech.
And I was tired and forgetting english (we were talking english,
that's how we met) and speaking of
heiflic's
hayflick limit I said deletions instead of divisions and she
corrected me that to delete is to remove, and it made me love her
even more. I confused it with russian делиться. was it the core of
russia's fuck up on biotech? a wrong translation. As a translator,
I met such an examplars, I know that
half of
the translations.. some percentage of translations is
wrong and misleading and not necessarily once.
And now I'm thinking "delitions & divisions are as similar as
(as could be ass, end, period) Λ & V.
One cell dissolves, two other appear. Were people of the past also
using microscopes, but those microscopes were made of eyes, and
thus were limited to their quality.
Or was those
eyes words of other
origin? Делиться значит разламываться, т.е. delete сюда недалеко.
Leaarn russian faggots, I learnt yours and others, mine is not
less interesting and being between english & japanese it is
very important. -い ending japanese adjectives even looks liike -и
which also makes russian adjectives. And it even looks like j
(which is historically i, because I heard it and
because I saw III as iij in some ald books. how certain are these anecdotal data? how
certain is academic one, when they give name of the book they
read it in, and that book could give this data anecdotically)
if you see the right part as the dot. We saw reversed inversed or
rotated letters before, right? L and Λ, W as Ш and Σ as S and Б as
b and Д as d
though I'm less sure about Б,
it's okay, don't be sure.
european left to right can be read top to bottom chinese way, and
chinese can be read european way.
She also gave me word strain (напряжён) which gave me sequence of
strain-strained-strange-stranger.
There were (baby)boomers, we're doomers (doom, doom metal,
generation doom) now zoomers (genZ)
It looks like greek alphabet is used for this psy-op.
also roujinZ
no need to reproduce after this point. but
we may. overpopulation is false prediction (recalculate, I won't
exp;ain) me pwersonally decided to reproduce after that great
replacement audiobook, as if he intimidated me "you better
reproduce you fucking doomer, or we'll genocide those silly
muzzos and it will be all your fault" and it's where the
previous paragraph grows from.
Reading of m
ath
I found
"it’s the simpler ratios like 2:3 (the perfect fifth)
and 5:4 (the major third) that sound the best to us (1:2 is so
basic we hear the notes as the same, just shifted by an
octave)."
2:3 as fifth and 5:4 as third, since shudras took over music, the
world is topsy-turvy.
Modes are named keys, and it quite could be related to K standing
instead of M. Another word is scale.
Make (me)
Take (ты (the(e)))
Make (me) (I am steal making it, don't take, it's mine, it's for
me)
Take (thee) (you (they, this) take it, te k. k as in kut
That cut thing... I had some relevation about it and I forgot to
write it down. Will I remember it? Now this is what 's taken for
memory loss under the influence of marijuana: the idea coming on
it are so out of this worlsd that you better write them down.
Oh yeah! I remember!
cut = к от (not to pearce, but to "to (к) off (от, from)) I never
expected cut to be "to off" which is also semantically similar
(can be the same, simi and isn't lar plural suffix mostly
forgotten in english, but quite present in turkic languages like
tatar -- Now you understand how much we're all the same family,
but brothers in sisters. In healthy family brothers don't want to
kill other brothers, so neither our military should bomb them, nor
their priesthood should try to subvert us. so the wquestion now is
"is it killing when you convert your brothers into your own
belief? because thus you're making them you, turning them into
you, so what you get is more yous and less of your brothers'
features, knowledge, beliefs - the wild irony is that is the least
you should want, just as people are affraid of cloning, то чего
много имеет низкую рыночную стоимость - that's a quote from some
ancient ai - I didn't want to botch it with translation)
I'm in love and I finally understood what libido means. It's the
opposite of mortido because it's wish to live, love - live, liebe
= lieve.
I couldn't work on this book for three days after I met her, all
my thoughts were about her, and now it went.. waned. I don't even
remember her face, only few features like unpierced earlobes,
uncut hair, a smile, comething about the color of her eyes, come
instead of some, my fingertips laugh at me? her eyes are fiery not
brown, but red, dark orange, were that lensese I wonder.. I will
meet her again. And now I'm not sure that cut thing came after I
met her, not before, not when I took shower before visiting that
english club. We'll see. Meeting once a week (like in church)
could be the power under our civilization which made us create
after we had that wave of love. So week could be related to our
biological processes, 4 weeks is one moon (a week is a fase of it.
phase? face!)
I will report on our second meeting, so you can see if love
crushes scientific process completely or if it gives me the next
half of the week for arts & science. It quite could be that
strain, pull, exertion, literally intension,
stretch, erection, tax (even this word has similar meaning) I'm
a baka gaijin, so you should figure out by these terms what I
wanted to say, or you shouldn't.
I just was speaking of x, haven't I? Look what the world has
brought my way:
I was speaking about x in my notebook:.. but in which one? That
was about x standing for h in greek and russian, so h could quite
be sh. I think it was in some trope of this book actually,
surprisingly not in this volume. And now all of the sudden I see
that in some language x is sh.
I think it's portugese:
I'm sorry for the image is sloppy, and loking for it I found a
spectacular names of italian nletters:
It's as if by names of those letters we can tell when they were
introduced:
effe, akka, elle, emme, enne, erre, esse seem to be of later
origin than bi ci di gi pi ti vi and considering them in the light
of abc sequence I believe zeta used to be zi, as it is in english,
though not many know its alternative name of zet. And what it
means? e is indeed an invariant of a? abcdg is the ancient
sequence, still can be found in ugaritic abecedary tablets and
recognized as z? (the exact z greeks have instead of g) Is it why
cursive g is d in russian, but g in english? For they used to be
the voiced lingual. But if g is for d, c is for b? I spoke about
this paradox before, I have no idea will further research figure
it out or not, I saw this magnificent
video (mirror)
few hous ago, and it relates to this question exactly. Sometimes
even when we're neither biased nor slopy, we still don't know what
is what for sure. And
this
And if we combine those monosillables, we have abcdg-opqt (i'm not
sure about q, but it reflects c) and it's more similar to roouh's
hypothesis of alphabet arranged as voiced-voiceless. Then
invariation of cg appeared when initial form of it was forgotten
and I suppose the initial form was ABGD-OPQT
or something of the kind. C & S could be introduced later to
make T ten (as in chinese too (T was X))
![](img/057.jpg)
we, I use we after all
academic norms finally got me
here
![](III_files/chinese_numerals.png)
click the image, there they go further in the past.
though wth, I will share that more ancient past too:
Is crazy cursed? crossed? cureSe? окружён? подрезан? (под~к?
semantically in this context: к, but not от = to, but not off = c
but not ut, knife or sword or scythe only touched it (к) but
didn't come through it (through ~ from, off~out~насквозь) voodoo
dolls are pierced, looks like rced ~ rsed, thus cu (q) should be
prefix (if rezatt (cutt) is the stem of these words) and pi then
is probably в [v] (in) - I thought it would be по [po] (by) but
the context of pierced tells it's "in". So why by is so
phonetically close to в?
If by is по then why is по not far from в? это по мне ~ это во
мне, as if в (v) is deeper inside than п (p)
В [v] is deeper inside than Б [b] (as in by, по)
How could в [v] stand for in, while n in greek is ν
Who misinterpreted what? ν is graphically "in"
вне is literally не в, but have I realy ever met no as postfix?
(other than in japanese, though japanese is quite an example, and
we met common suffixes from this ancient period)
I know I told me not to write about relitgion, but it's volume III
and I have a better point:
Devil & evil as deva & Eva happened to be just patriarchal
smearing of female memes.
Elohim happens to be female deity too. Those three mothers are
elohim (goddesses)
(see above)
And I was reading lyrics by Impaled Nazarene, and this line
appeared:
"Satan represents vengeance instead of turning the other cheeck"
(4. Opolokia II: Aikolopa 666)
so I wanted to speak of fight of gods as fight of ideas, ways,
forms humans are to form. To understand this concept you may need
to read this book:
and while I was looking for it I found another one:
http://www.pktluke.szm.com/download/Aleister_Crowley_-_Magic_In_Theory_And_Practice.pdf
(
mirror)
also for me to read for some reason.
This book, aeiou.ru, brings me information my itself: its images
are used somewhere else and by searching them you may find some
interesting discussions with all sorts of information in it:
https://www.stolenhistory.org/threads/tartarian-language-and-alphabet.930/
and though that link doesn't deliver
As in all ancient calendars, the Germanic
calendar before the adoption of the Julian one would have
been lunisolar, the
months corresponding to lunations. Tacitus in his Germania (ch. 11) writes
that the Germanic peoples observed the lunar months.
The lunisolar calendar is reflected in the
Germanic term *mēnōþ-
"month" (Old English mōnaþ, Old Saxon mānuth,
Old Norse mánaðr,
and Old High German mānod,[1]
Gothic mēnōþs,[1][2]
being a derivation of the word for "moon",
mēnô —
which shares its ancestry with the Greek mene
"moon", men "month", and Latin mensis
"month".
Meсяц - с stands instead of n, and I thought it wasn't possible.
and I brought this quote from wiki hiere to show that mensis
меняется, тогда sun is the same.
sun as (est) sunus
(est as is, thus that disgusting ass is the ancient form due to
get obsoleted)
But how will I use is in as.. ass.. form?
as good as it gets will be is good is it gets? first is ain't
needed, good as it gets is the same.
but if we put is instead of as, we get it as a question. good is
it gets has somewhat different meaning.
SO grammatically no, may be A as B will not change if we put is
instead of as, but in other contexts it as not going to be
invariant. here it was - was, not wis. wiz is with? A is B can be
the same as A with B (as if they're one team)
there with who = there is who
there with me = there is me
and it puts russian с [s] as an invariant of with. but with is the
past form if was is the past form? How can with be in the past
form?
And why as--as doesn't work like is? probably because instead of
two as was only one, ans the other one was that for example. And
as--as is the same as the--the: the higher the better. nah, not
exactly, they don't say as higher as better. What is the semantic
difference between the & as?
If governments don't dismantle, handing their powers over to
citizens, kellerdrones will get to them.
It's not my wish or plan, but my prediction, a prophecy
So I'm a prophet now?
I can predict the future, yet everybody can do, but I do on a
longer scale.
There are prophets more powerful by computational powers than me.
But they didn't see or didn't utter or I didn't hear they say
anything about the dissolvement of the states. Though it is
obvious, but once again, after I so carelessly uttered this
future, doesn't it allow them to evaid it. Dismantling the states
is a solution to avoid. the other one is dark ages, but who would
who was wo? me? can be used instead of who? because after this
question you're answered if you or not or maybe more. Me? is a
better (more tricky) way to ask "who?" becausee thus truth can be
answered and if the person didn't have a candidate for something
good, he may consider you, so use it mostly when you want what you
ask about.
Here used to be discussion of who are those prophets and who are
of those activeists don't make prophecies, but make heroic acts
and thus saints.
and here that resemblance of Saint & satan (santa is saint.
claus is nicolaus just as kolya is for nikolay)
so what is the common theme among saint & satan? they're both
spirits, demi-gods or demi-urg.. demi-org? demi-ork? demi-oak?
demi-око? dem9 (demon as demi-man or demi-On? dem1 almost me)
fiends, f ~ s is θ
θaint θatan
faint fantom
θgo 890 oh what kind of script is it I took to show g
as 9 not g which looks more like 8
was it the position of the letter in the alphabet which
influenced its graphic appearance?
7 is Z then (both can have skirts. zie?) 6 = b? for labial
is supposed to be ther, but f also look like 7
and it also have (the obligatory this time) skirt, without skirt
it's s in fraktur: which could be connected with its
position in alphabet: 7 can be both F & Z as g can be both 8
& 9
How dare I put g after
θ? abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
dfh what is it?
am I wondering? wandering around, I should put this thing on
hiatus, as I used to. Love takes me off this.
I think I spoke about muses in relation to three main groups (as
if concept of muses were
asoi related
to the concept of three mothers)
![](III_files/3bfe11e55a5f18e39d3ef2abea7a0abd.jpg)
As you
can see, three muses are
attributed to musical instruments:
Clio:
guitar
(and history)
Euterpe:
flute
(and dialects, courses?)
Terpsichore: harp
(dance, education)
three others are attributed to science:
Thalia:
geometry
(architecture, agriculture,
comedy(?))
Poly
hymnia:
geometry
(?) (grammar,
mimic art, divine hymns)
Ourania: astronomy
(also
observed in geometric lines)
Three others are about
poetry:
Calliope: heroic poetry (and
rhetoric art)
Erato: love poetry (love and
weddings)
Melpomene: tragedy (in poetry?
melos, rhetoric speech,
compare to calliope!~)
And we have three ways to use the alphabet: letters of poetry,
digits of science, notes of music.
But all the science of muses is about geometry. Just as that
ancient geometric artifact, and it's all in digits:
aeiou are music
b and t must be mem & shit, geometry & poems.
I arranged them randomly, but it arranged correctly:
mem is math, poems are wins(shins)wits(s'its)
mem is math also because mem is mother.
otets syn are aleph shin? mem is mother?
mothers calculate better? in the most of families women are
delegated to lead the budget.
syn would record words? in his homework from school?
fathers made musical instruments (we know that from our fathers.
most of the time: only fathers play guitar in my family (bro &
sis learnet from him. but my mom's mom played guitar too. here we
have 2x2 of males and females, but only 1 teacher: man. and I
thought of my buddy nick who is a musician & his son learns
music. And here's the killer argument: most of musicians are men.
I believe that most of mathematicians & writers are, but Neter
was a woman, that programmer with 2 meters stack of code, and
those black ladies who calculated space missions that movie I
didn't feel like watching. Women have motherhood, guys have mostly
the work. I'm not edgey, it's sexism, lame and dumb, am I growing
up if I'm writing it? I edit my vk albums from all the edy stuff
(on the verge of porn & snuff, just in sake of fighting for
liberty, now I remove them to a closed album of quarantined
pictures: religion and politics opened it a couple of years ago
and now politics, religion, sex & violence go there, not to
let the children get traumatized, not to shock chicks I used to
shoo away with that very riveting stuff)
Back to muses: me personally, I don't like to play music, I love
to listen to it. But I'm creating words. numbers.. also not so
much.
words is worst.
best is the beast?
aeiou is music
, what muslims prohibit (and I
thought that prohibition has roots in orthodox judaism, but
2_Chronicles_29:25 and Ps. 33:2 explicitly permits musical
instruments)
beast could be beats, the beats of life, as beast is the most
being, being the most.
so math is in the middle. and it is probably closer to music than
words. and math can be in words, but hardly can you put music in
words. in a sense musical notes are mathematic signs (they symbol
pitch and length)
compare it with angel-me-shaitan symbolism: angel could be
represented with малиновый звон (mellow sound) while shaitan is
curses which are in words (just as swears, anathemas, and prepare
to be shocked: all the books are in words)
and some muslims also consider math the work of shaitan (as if
everything is work of shaitan except what actually is)
If this world is built by god, math is of godly origin. or what if
it's of pre-godly origin?
oh my, I'm going too far again, excusez moi.
Some people asked the board: "why do jews spew those antiwhite
remarks? The only reasonable explanation I see is they want to be
hated." - if they believe in afterlife, they probably want to be
martyred, because suicide in verbodden. and this part they have
common
iwith normans (the violent
death, avoiding aging, to be beautiful in the coffin when the
messiah comes to reanimate. And they're absolutely correct. My
task thus is to preserve myself for later generations, but I have
to become a legend first, so they would want to resurrect me, to
enjoy my company. And this part those jews ignore, they better
change their pr. I told you, neither jew nor greek (
ass al all are people) when ai
i-powered augmented cognition meets
genetic therapies. who cares what apes did before they became
ubermensch
b & nt contrapose not only in the basics of alphabet, but also
in the german uber & unter.
but it contradicts the previous notion that b is bas & t is
hout.
But we met twists before: M & Ж, but ma & jo, мама &
тятя, but if jo is io, and io is goddess (eloha is goddess (female
el)) el is L, lingual, male part, thus -ha is alike to rusian -на
(and both are HA(НА))
Ергы цуэдд аштв еру зкшьфд пкфььфешс ащкьы
фтв цуэдд аштв фтсшуте пкфзршсфд удуьутеыю
Thus we'll find the primal grammatic forms and wy'll find ancient
graphical elements.
Ия эс ио (яхве, иегова) энд боус ар ферст персонал пронаун.
&I (I&I)
(it was possible to compare when I understood that both devil
& eve? yahve=yeve? than demon & a'dam. amsterdam? dam is
damb, female is river man is bank. спускать на воду, спускать на
баб.)
current ~ currency ~ бáбки ~ бáбоньки (семантически также верно:
мужик твёрдое, баба жидкое)
even in мужик jack is twice more than m mu = mы? где ма = женщина?
акума плохая женщина, акунин плохой мужчина
(вторую
этимологию (пускай шуточную)
прочёл у самого Акунина)
Aumin, that eclectic formula of essens. if it's authentic, it
shows european culture secondary to the eastern.
Even though the reverse wave also took place and taught indians
patriarchy and brahman (monotheism)
and who knows how many such waves took place back and forth. every
genius is the centre of waves. so hypothetically we can
reconstruct all the past of language by understanding all the
modern languages in tiniest details. and who says it's impossible?
so far I see it as an open way. please research.
5 vowels, B & T and those b & t are alpha & omega.
Bog (god, be-male) and Tiamat, tma, mat, Diess
I though lingual were male, labials female? Then B is baba=mama,
t=tyotka, aunt. And this n~t relates to what I found earlier
today:
A B C D
E F G H
I
J K L M N
O P Q R S
T
U V W X Y Z
and notice that it could have been a perfect 5*5 if we put Z in
the second row (where it is in greek & hebrew) then we have
only one slot & two letters: and NT could be ng, or whatever
that fifth lingual ugaritic alphabet includes in its canon. Is it
G, when C & G divided? Then what is her dubbleganger in the
second line? θ? θ as an invariant of F? G as an invariant of F? It
correlates that digamma thing and г [в] in его, чего, кого, всего,
белого, all the russian examples of this morpheme (him(?)) act the
same way, orthography dictates them to say g, but they keep on
saying v (and that v is the closest sound they traditionally have:
it's a common belief that words with [f] (Ф, Ѳ - the first one is
their F, the second one is historically that very Θ, both stand
for the same [f] and different only by the historic periods of
their use)
So what we observe here: probably the fifth varna underdeveloped
or developed and dismantled, whatever it may be, a coincidence or
evidence, it requires thorough research.
And if we rearrange NZT, we have final Y, which resembles final
vowels in greek, runic from bornholm & russian alphabets.
(though I put this out in black, I've no idea if
it's not nothing. Big if true, though who knows how true it is)
bog is god in russian. bon is good in
french.
thus b & d always contest who of them is good and who is
bad, who is bonne and who ist drag (дрянь, но добро, good, но
гад и гавно, вно is bono? гаbono thus is literally bad goods
(for they use it on their fields)
That bg (big) topic relates to D standing for both Devil &
Devs, as if perish & peril? as if l & s are the same? H
is just above L in the alphabet.
god is гад & sheiten is derogatory term of the opponent, who
knows if snake or io are actuallly that.
both are in different context, I assume (what a dirty word, what
are we suupposed to do with it)
Я не хочу его звать = я не хочу его знать
call~know
and greek Nv is another time lingual equals labial, the other one
is b~c непонятнка (чего [чево] and some other cases I don't
remember now - it's time to make a pin-map on my wall)
rsync --ignore-errors - это если пачку
файлов закопировать хочешь
dd conv=noerror - это когда по-одному ценные файлы пытаешься
реанимировать
(that's for me to copy files under linux. will remove when learn
or will leave it here just because this part'a'graph can be more
valuable than some)
Wanna ~ Gonna (to that v~g collection of чево~чего)
I am gonna ~ I wanna (I will)
amg ~ w?
Those three sides of alphabet: musical notation, mathematical
notation, language of speech (I wonder if it can also begin with m
as I recognized it as the third mother)
And it's wonderful that education begins with these three subjects
(yet music is given well only to those few
who go to the musical school, and it is one of the main fields
of special education)
chemistry is all in digits, though they use letters for some
chemical elements. it also uses math as it's method, physics is
even closer to math, for chemistry is more new field: it used to
be alchemie, but have you read it? it all looks like chemistry
was in the field of phylosophy, which probably grew out of pœtry
(if it's true that poems were the first
literary texts - I doubt it's true, I believe the most ancient
findings are merchantry, and thus math, so I must look deeper
into math. Luckily for me I recently bought Number Words And
Number Symbols. A Cultural History Of Numbers, and it has
plenty of images (just a shadows of those I can find in the
internet, but what can you expect from paper, it's also in
monochrome. I think it's time we stop buying paper books. It's
also time we stop using forests as building material: we've
destroyed as much as we have now (we had twice as much) in the
latest couple of centuries, and technologies can destroy the
rest in just one, luckily for us we have ecologic movements
and they mostly began half a century ago. I hope in the
following half a century this movement gets the momentum to
reverse the dendrocide. And we have weed prohibited for the
same century (and half a century - globally) and you can see
that the only way for that pendulum is the reverse: the
eternal azazel is named more and more each year, last time it
happened, they took all the world (wasn't it theirs already?
it was their on religious and probably financial levels, now
it's politically theirs, polity & economy are the same
religion & finance? finance yeah, but religion as polity?
who wrote the laws? who told right from wrong, ironically
having that ability considered a sin in the very beginning of
their book. That book is not what it seems, and that's what
makes it great, also so many authors, so many centuries of
cristallizing out of who knows what.
Physics also uses letters for their abstract concept, and thus
it's the fifth (or fourth) matter (or is it the same mother, m
oath using letters not only for digits,
but also for expressions, formulas, spells?
Chemie probably came from art of philosophy
(after al they were looking for philosophic stone) of
speech into more strict field of mathematical science. Is it why
physicists stereotypically disrespect chemists? gosh people are so
dumb
Are names like
He (H + e?) and Al
& Br come from those ancient times of philosophy? after all
those are abbreviations of words: aluminum &
bromium bromine
(bromium
is bromine in latin I wonder how I could know)
This rabbithole goes deeper
(I wonder if
german way of combining letters can witness their ancient
literary culture, because look at that rabbithole I put
together, it's caused by the previous concept I decided to work
with by taking them as a word) so putting first three
letters for math as
a)
b)
c)
I decided to put them for written speech, and my first guess was
вас [vas] which is a russian word for you, literally "to you", to
as two? but you doesn't look like three
(though
it looks like ten: ю)
though "to you" is вам [vam] (also notice that m looks like
russian cursive for т [t]) and вас is accusative of you: я
поблагодарил вас = I thanked you.
And even bigger surprise waited me in music, when I put BAC
together I recognized that it missed H, for I knew before that
BACH could be played as musical notes. And though americans
surprisingly don't know of H (even though germans made pianos
there, and I was told that H is german way of writing Bb or, more
correctly B♭, but no, it's just B. H in germany (and russia) is B
elsewhere, and it's the real brainfuck in musical theory. And you
only knowtice it if you compare musical theories of different
nations (but even russians who learnt this H thing don't know much
of how it happened that americans have no idea what H is, and of
course russians seldom dig modern music on the same level brits
& americans do (swedes do, btw)
Bach is a german composer, so he could be the one responsible for
introduction of H into musical notation? I heard he was the one
who delivered хорошо темперированный клавир, т.е. переход от
натурального лада к темперированному (нестройному, so they could
go from one octave to another (whatever it means, don't trust me
here, study it yourself, I wish I don't bring misconception, thus
I must develop the culture of double-checking all the information,
and be sure you don't check the same school repeating the same
mistakes, probably the best way is to find their rivals, even
though academy today is ominously una
nonimous,
look for other opinions in other country: as I managed to find
different point of view on what those 7 notes are, and
pentatonicas are way more simple and natural and primal, and who
knows why people are not taught beginning with that? pentagram
form of that scale? 7 is a christian number. Is this book godly or
ungodly? It repeats bible, but Jesus named jews you know what, for
some reason I kinda've grown up falling in love I wanted her love,
so I removed over a hundred of images from common folder into a
hidden one, those images were there for 9 years and only once or
twice was I told that it was abnormal (some edgy stuff
neighbouring porn & guro and even sometimes being on that
territory, I am a weird guy after all) and that hidden folder
first included only religion and politics, after I knew that it's
unethical to touch these subjects, and I knew it rather late, at
30 maybe - and I still break these taboos, such a naughty me, a
savage I say of myself, ain't I program myself. i instead of m? i
& m reflect each other around the key. and they were the few
who didn't (other than M & И are somewhat similar, but И is
not W, though both are doubles: II & VV and these are roman
numerals! a stick and a tag? a tick! stick & tick! they're
probably the same.
tick could be related to somethin cunieform. those two could be
the cunieforms, they have two types of... клин. so many
translations for this word, I don't know which is corrrect:
wedge
(клин, линейчатый клин, что-либо в
форме клина)
chock
(чурка, подушка, башмак, клин, чека,
распорка)
gore
(кровь, клин, запекшаяся кровь,
ластовица, свернувшаяся кровь, участок земли клином)
key
(ключ, клавиша, кнопка, код, шпонка,
клин)
gusset
(ластовица, клин, вставка, угловое
соединение, наугольник)
shim
(шайба, клин, тонкая прокладка)
spearhead
(острие, наконечник копья, острие
копья, клин, передовая часть)
spike
(шип, колос, острие, костыль, гвоздь,
клин)
cotter
(шплинт, чека, клин, шпонка, батрак,
бедняк-арендатор)
gib
(клин, кот, кошка, направляющая призма,
контрклин, укосина)
quoin
(клин, внешний угол здания, угловой
камень кладки, замок свода)
salient
(выступ, клин)
fid
(небольшой толстый кусок, клин,
колышек, свайка, шлагтов)
cleat
(планка, зажим, клемма, шпунт, клин,
рейка)
nib
(перо, выступ, кончик, острие, кончик
пера, клин)
salicylate
(выступ, клин)
scotch
(черта, надрез, клин, башмак)
gad
(острый шип, острие, копье, клин,
зубило, бодец)
jack
(гнездо, домкрат, розетка, подъемник,
компенсатор, клин)
glut
(избыток, затоваривание,
перепроизводство, пресыщение, излишество, клин)
bulge
(выпуклость, выступ, раздув,
преимущество, увеличение, клин)
salience
(выпуклость, выступ, клин)
gore is a weird word. if what the dictionary tells is true, it's
кор
ка (след от клин
ка запёкшейся кровью, и клин земли это
тоже жесть, но и тоже кор
ка от
участка)
кл ин клин кэн би зэт вери кор э=е екскаватор, летс юс онли
леттукы letters before t & u, you
cannot say you without u, that's why both runes & romans had U
after T.
Jews & Arabs have U where we have F (russians have Ё. both
russian & english are sexual (fuck & ёб)
so I bet that U has some dirty meaning and in the same meaning
these two share. and I wonder in what language? We have so many
languages that I doubt I cannot fall into indulgence of apophenia.
But this poetry sews (soedinaet (со
единяет)
co
-unite
s)
those languages together, and also explains something, so who
knows, sometimes these guesses must be true, the following task is
to separate seeds from tares.
(тара in russian is definitely connected to the word I never knew.
Why don't they teach us words we already know?! they don't want us
to understands each other. but I'm sure most of you didn't see the
resemblance between these two meanings of tare (tares of a seed
are the tare it's served in) or if you did, I don't feel language
as you do, so I witness that most of that fraction of percent of
foreigners who know the word tare in its both forms don't that
those words are the same.
back to "to you" (T U ? ᛏ as an arrow can go anywhere, it tells
"to" (but it's only a guess of course))
B A C (B + C? if а (but) sometimes is и (and) which is and)
and
but
ain't this how the alphabet
ends? begins? with
the simplest words?
there are more simple words:
a
be
see
(among particles it would be so)
do
A doesn't fit words of B C D let's find a simple verb beginning
with a: ARE?!
are is good
are
be
is
?
I already noticed that these are three mothers but I never
nothiced them as first three letters (even though I noticed first
three letters as three mothers) but I never thought of C or D or ᚦ
as of "is"
Now I should find ᚦ in is in whatever northern european language.
I just returned from the field where I videotaped two musicians
speaking of B & H:
---video
----video
-----audio
And though me myself didn't understand much of what they told me,
when one of them told me that ♭ stands before the note: ♭C is
beforeC
Can BC and AD come from musical notation?
As if AD stood for the ancient pentanonic(?) scale, and BC is the
order of the modern notes.
And thus ABCD as the combination of those two. As two additional
notes added into the ancient row.
So what is the hypothesis? ADEFG is the ancient pentatonica?
That's what I said, but now playing with
https://femurdesign.com/omni/
I don't think so. hm..
I called one of those musicians and we'll roll it together.
He said ок, но пока воюю (с фермой крипты)
I said удачи в бою
воюю бою - this pair supports my ancient guess that война = бойня
(war = slaughter(house))
russian alphabet is абвгд which reveals бв as a claster, and thus
б & в as invariants.
бета=вита (both are the names of β in different periods and
regions)
h ~ j (juan [huan] jesus [he sus])
correlate to stavless & staved rune ᚷ & ᚼ
I spoke about it in the very beginning of this book.
Now I know I will make another edition of these tomes
where I combine it by the topics.
co in come is go
it is common from britain (and its beyond) and chinese (and
whoever may happen around)
I was speaking of
行く [iku] which is i in the main
hierogliph, and that very i can be found in russian иди
[idi] where di is the common verbal suffix, just as く is in japanese.
And the first like of this paragraph demands that ku of く was that very co
It can be verified or falsified by comparing other
japanese words ending with ku (if they're all one or
another form of going, its verified, else they're
falsified)
まく [maku] I take if from jisho.org
for I still didn't learn my japanese:
Here I compare iku to aku maku oku uku
it's well enough to evaluate probability of this being
nothing.
(does it make you worry that I make you
click this things I wonder, you clicked to read this one)
старение=стирание
тсюда может расти моя тяга запереться в искусственной матке.
может рости, но расти моя милая (две сходных формы: рости
инфинитив, ра
фсти императив)
why didn't russians have f?
c запретить было бы логичней: я думал про
плевки, но с чревата лишь неприятным эффектом, что был на старом
советском телевидении. очень раздражающий эффект, поразительно
что советские телевизионщики постоянно этим грешили. для чего
этот экскурс в историю? скрой серым снегом серою золой. т
же вроде плюётся? никогда не замечал специально, теоретизирую.
может именно сочетание фт плюётся? если практика покажет что так,
то это могло быть причиной запрета ф. кафтан (и плю.. но я
попробовал плюнуть сказав кафтан и даже специально не получилось.
тьФу как раз плюётся. т.е. не фт, а тф.
который
в слове тфилин? у евреев был ф, может это ещё одна причина того
что их не сильно привечали? одна из многих, там их миллион,
генетическая терапия же такими числами оперирует? (если в атомах
считать по крайней мере)
Am I just repeating that common myth of ф being used only
in foreign words? тьфу is a russian word.
There definitely something fishy about ф for it is an invariant of
θ which has quite a history.
от of / to
of / for
also
for / from challenges how the m works
as if f & t are initially the same, and θ could be tabooed for
combining lips & tongue into a consonant.
смычка может быть разной. семантически она похоже что была единой.
губы, язык - это уже философствование, мифологизирование,
усложнение картины мира и языка.
custard & mustard. I wonder if our savage ancestors call it
turd
(as if one for cake & one for
meat) (no etymologist will dare to
assume it, as no etymologist will suggest that ass in assume is
at least a jackass or whatever it can really be we may only
guess at this point, but here's a good one:
from Latin assumere, adsumere
"to take up, take to oneself, take besides, obtain in
addition," from ad "to, toward,
up to" (see ad-) + sumere "to take," from sub "under" (see sub-) + emere
"to take," from PIE root *em-
"to take, distribute."
and mine are bad. I'm so bad, this draft
will not be included in the published edition of course. It's
just some nerdy game
The Three
Fates or, some say,
Io the sister of Phoroneus, invented
five
vowels of the first alphabet,
and the consonants B and T
фАты = фатЫ
?
brinds?
brides?
facts ~ matters
fairies ~ mothers
priest is a groom of deities.
just as nun is god's bride.
Imagine how many beatuiful examplars were washed out of the gene
pool because of this custom.
was it a arrogant ignorant will of the ugly ones? they wanted to
survive, not to be washed out of the gene pool? no, thy simply
envied and plotted against pretty (and thus having less reason of
being smart) did (they) made us smarter but that ugly will? Can we
reconstruct those beautiful genes in us? Be influenced by
intelligent genese, many smart people are beautiful. They would
also want to be prettier, and thus they would set new standarts.
Let's compare italian
and english forms of latin to russian arranged close to aeiou:
![](img/italian_alphabet_color_letters_list.png)
![](III_files/English-alphabet-black-and-white-printable-600x849.jpg)
![](III_files/russkiy_alfavit.jpg)
(though I think italian variant is the most based, if we
recognize OP & QR as invariants, it even shows triple
(not four-fold) earlier form of the alphabet (which is also
shown in the first line of runic & last line of
ugaritic) I probably write about it later, but I'm not sure
I do, and I'm here after I'm half way through volume III, I
just mention it because it's important, I repeat things,
especially in volume III)
Я позволяю себе слишком многое отчасти и потому, что русы ~ трусы,
славящиеся трусостью зайцы также называются русаками (в совке
родители даже наряжали своих детей зайчиками)
Славы ~ слабы (может потому мы и съебали в тайгу чтоб только все
от нас отъебались)
и может сами русаки считают что слава - это glory, g ~ c, л = l, a
~ o, в ? r (I said that в ! г
б) б's typo
but I don't know if I can apply it here. it could be related
words, as if glory = глоры? slaves. The more slaves you have, the
bigger army you may build of them, their wives & children are
your hostage. People depending on you are your slaves, even if
theyre free.
ещё разок: russians are made to dress as hares as children, and
one of names for hare is literally rusak, it's so humiliating,
some vile black magicians fucked us up for whatever reason,
russians speak r with tongue and trus is literally coward in
russian. their surnames end with cow, their capital ends with cow,
mos cow. It all is so unaccidental, some sociologic magic, it
should be exposed and prohibited.
> трусік это и есть заяц
по-белорусски
I met a guy from nigeria who told me that their alphabet is
habidi. I thought ha is how they pronounce aleph and asked him is
it arabic influence? he said "no, not arabic, not arabic" they
speak english there. and ha is how they pronounce a, because it's
abidi,
(mirror) I
misheard him. Abidi as in bornholm runic alphabet
Я не говорю, что Нигерия могла быть матерью алфавитов (это крайне
маловероятно. но у них тифинаг ссевера, мероитский свостока.
Нигерие
йц тот об этом понятия не
имеет. и тем не менее. Нгибиди похоже на абиди. It's nsibidi, and
it is used exactly where abidi is spread: in the south-eastern
Nigeria. so not that маловероятно after all. I had that feeling.
Another funky thing is that nigeria and russia where I am are very
similar by economic and populational digits, both are oil
companies. Isn't oil found where much of organic was? Doesn't it
denote centers of animal popultion we're part of? Too brave a
proposition, yet can be deep. Initially I only wanted to say
that... I forgot what I wanted to tell instead of what I did.
Another dialect's reading of abidi is under that clickable image
leading to a magnificient channel:
(I never met such cool
approach to african literacy)
(english language makes
miracles)
(russians should adopt it
too)
(mirror)
Abidi is not only preserving the ancient triliteral order ABD
(first by its name, second by its order where there no C but a
biliteral construction of CH, probably added later (or else it
would be how their C roll), but it also goes in beautiful 6*6 and
the image abo
ugve separates it so
that vowels are initial in 4 of 6 lines and the other two lines
end with vowels. It could be nothing, or it could be not, boy it's
definitely something. I didn't expect to meet it here when I spoke
about italian, english & russian alphabets yesterday.
And it's another example of how letters clasterize.
Biliteral go as a cloud in the centre of the abidi.
Final line UỤVWYZ is the only case I know where Y is in the same
claster as UVW, for they're related.
(in latin it's always separated by X)
So now I recalled what I wanted to say: we have to make
excavations in Nigeria. And we probably have to dig deeper,
because life there is way more active, layers are thicker and
abundant. Kingdoms could be there when people made things of
stone. One question is why no artefacts are saved on the surface?
What if because they were conquered by their powerful neighbours
berbers & meroe and all their culture was whether destroyed or
dislocated? What if their elite left the place taking everything
of value with them? What if I'm only tripping? All these things
are possible, but if I suspected remains of civilization in New
Zealand, why not to expect it in Nigeria? Africa is more likely to
hold such treasures and it correlates modern consensus (which is
never something to trust though) that Africa is a cradle of human
race.
а
Бог мой, сатана моя!
it's mostly poetry, it was said when I
realized something of above
and "a" appeard there by accident making it an alphabet a Б c
Nigeria is the second african country by GDP only to the Egypt.
With a large margin from South Africa
Nigeria is the first african country by population (it's two times
bigger than Egypt, which is the third)
Cameroon which neighbours Nigeria is the most liguistically
diverse african country, and it is one of the most linguistically
diverse countries in the world, second probably only to Papua New
Guinea. Nigeria is probably 17th, but Igbo has different dialects,
which can be so different that the same word "one" is "otụ" in one
dialect yet "ofu" in another. So I would challenge that chart,
because Cameroon is a not much less than Nigeria (but it's
smaller, and it's population is 9 (nine!) times smaller than that
of Nigeria (though that could cause that diversity, when people
are less dense, they communicate as one community less, thus they
don't recognize each other as the same. Does it make sense? yeah)
any way I suspect a linguistic voluntarism in deciding what is
language and what is dialect, and different scientists probably
worked in different countries and thus we need ai once again to
check what we piled up)
Strict laws against profanation are rather simple: imagine
starting a club. A club which contains some cool kids, who were so
special, they felt like separating themselves from the rest, so
they put facecontrol, dresscode, passwords, not to allow the plebs
to get inside to spoil the holy day.
Now imagine some member of the club befriending with some plebs
kids and letting them in.
Ancient laws could even
invoke to
slay that member and his friends practicing rituals they were not
fit 4
Thinking of namaste,
interesno chto proizoidet esli stopy toje sovmestit (v
nevesomosti naprimer)
chtob bez zazemlenia - togda i sostav jidkosti vajen
recognizing ж as j makes sense because
s
jz isn't it how it goes in greek? eZ it does. j=i? H=И (now this
one is in official history of russian)
abcd
efg
hijklmn
opqu
u placed itself by force. (uncon
csciously,
as a typo)
and it makes sense: vowel labial lingul, u ends bornholm's abc and
archaic roman.
romans also have it as numeral, second after unary numeral system.
and the following number is x which follows it even in the
alphabet. and probably alphabet ended at t when people used unary
numeral system (tally sticks) and v, x, L, C, D, M? these final
four are unknown to the most of people, while I V X are used ways
more commonly, everybody know them, and it was even more true when
I was a kid.
I know M is an abbreviation for mile (1000) and I also know that
cycle ends before it, so it was not technically a number. I also
know that C could be an abbreviation for cent. What is L & D
if not left & dextris. What language made L & D for left
& right in biolochemistry? why not S & D (left =
sinistris)
Could it relate to moon? C & D then would be first. Cтар
еющая & Растущая - так мы в русском
запоминаем фазы луны.
L looks like C and it is half of C (the lower half) Г is C
(historically & by position in the alphabet)
I think I just understood why gimel looks like lambda. they're the
same, oLd & карГа (or some better examples in other languages)
and thus I recognize tridevi as moon:
and whether google watches me closely, or (way more likely) it is
a magnificient coincidence that it was always on the surface and I
just caught up.
How dare they call it neopaganism! Something is pahhening
I also believe google named themselves alphabet after I published
this discovery, they must have found the word having very peculiar
explosion of interest for. And I don't say mememe, there was this
flow of mentionings of that aeiou thing, I am just a part of that
flow.
Crone is the name for oLd moon.
D looks the
other way, so whether they wrote right to left (and changed only
to mimic sun) having that letter in reverse, or something else,
I just forgot.
then J for junge reflects C as J reflects L in k-symmetry, even
though it's teh least certain of them.
if J reflects C, then it's JBC, where B is M for MoOm (n is an
invariant of m)
J = I explains ا standing for A, in triple alphabet all vowels are
the same, that's what diacritic is for.
In brahmic 𑀫 stands for M. which reminds both arabic, hebrew
& egyptian owl.
Trying to find Petrie's hornbook Wadell mentions, I found a
fascinating book: https://archive.org/details/b1592871/page/n305
and though it doesn't include any of those hornbooks Wadell shows,
it shows a way to dig in relation to his "It was long ago noticed
that in the Phœnician, Greek and Latin or Roman alphabets there is
a repeated sequence of the letters as vowels, labials, gutturals
and dentals. This sequence is well displayed by Professor Petrie,
in arranging the letters on a square table like the old
"Horn-book" board for teaching children their ABC."
I attach it here as a clickable screenshot:
(mirror)
If you have a cross to bear by Moloko made me think of this saying
in the context of cors being similar to curse, not only
phonetically, but also semantically.
And Christ is anathemated by talmud and also in another context:
x_
X.
I also saw a wooden house with chalk crosses
all over it's external wall, and it's stove sent smoke through
all the rooms (it was impossible to live there. maybe that was
the reason the man to whom that home belonged died young, I
never knew him, I was told he was sick or something, could it be
a coincidence or not? who knows. and that house burnt down for
some impossible reason, I may ask about it, but if some house
was cursed, that one definitely was. it had some other issues
too)
Сейчас на двоще прочёл слово туроканы, и
только дошло почему на форче их называют roaches.
Неужели это родственные слова?
Представь сколько ещё столь же неполиткорректной лексики
выползет, когда этимологией (в том числе и топонимов) будет
заниматься беспристрастный искусственный интеллект.
Размышляя над колодой таро, где дьявол стоит после смерти, как и
uvw находится после т
подумал, что это карта, что ведёт от 0 до 21, где 21 это мир (весь
мир, любая его точ
ка)
и только потом сооразил, что таро картами и называют. in russian
card & map are the same word.
and collecting such homonyms we can reconstruct the initial
territory of the language.
So first we put map & card in one block. then we collect all
these homonyms into blocks (some blocks may be included into
others and as a result we will probably have all the world
combined into one huge block, and even if that block is
accidental, or if there different maps of language are possible,
depending on the order we used, it will be very informative. It is
an interesting idea of an experiment.
But how will I separate true homonyms from occasionally similar
words? That is another challenge of this experiment, if it has any
sense. Are you reading? huh..
maximum dice is 18 (6+6+6)
maximum tarot is 21 (7+7+7) and some card game also has 21 as the
maximum possible score.
does form of chromosomes as X & Y reflect female being even
and male being odd? id does, but how?
our culture could originate in previous culture. it does, but how
far did they advance? if they knew atoms, they could know elements
(as in 666 standing for carbon beasts are made of) and then they
definitely knew chromosomes. It takes crystal balls (which are
lenses) to see cells. who knows what technologies they actually
had.
here I share my ancient dr
åfts
simply because when I read books of some cool people, I often
thought "why don't they publish their drafts? when I grow up I
will make sure the drafts are published. at least now I sorta
published mine.
I should tell that which that cursed children are cursive
(красивы) и может потому говорят что "не родись
счастливой красивой, а радись
счастливой!
Э" родись, не надись
радись, радись похоже на рядись (mask, mascerade, pretend,
притворись) но разве красота обязательно грустна? смотри какие
похожие слова. может грустящие девочки выходят красивыми? I don't
know, maybe pretty girls have more reasons to be sad, for they're
attacked more often? a girl raped twice commited suicide by
euthanasia recently, oh why have I found myself in this wicked
territory? Society, I was talking of humans, it's near politics
which is explicitly forbidden by e
ttiquette.
(by a ticket? invitation probably explains
dresscode and topic of the party, so etiquette could grow out of
such party tickets)
some of my etymologies may be freaky, so take them as poetry
all this work only
made several discoveries on connections between writing
systems. Semantic part of the language is still vague for me.
AI may help me put all the languages in one head. Until
them, it's somewhat like graphomania, have I said that? It is
the weirdest disorder, or is it just a banter word, not
recognized by psychiatry? for otherwise isn't it a productive
passion? even if the writer is not good, fake it till you make
it. many prominent writers tell to write several hours a day, I
write not even every day, so I don't have it, but I still wonder
what kind of mania is that? it's probably more like gourmet
mania, not narcomania or necromantia. It's narcomania in my way
too, weed has a drug-element to it (I want it too much, a little
less would be just right. same for the sweets, I don't know what
kills me more)
Jesus said that forgive your enemies, but he also said that
enemies to the man is his own family. Makes perfect sense
together, neh? They just don't know what they're doing. And so he
invented Hanlon's razor
Was he speaking that we're all the same
family? Was he talking not to the
jews, but to the pigs inside of them? Was it a command to pigs
to jump off the cliff, not to the humans themselves?
So the question now is how to turn my enemies into my friends.
There's a trick I heard: want to make an enemy, give him
everything, take a half.
want to make a friend, take from him everything, return a half.
Is it true or just some
satanic formula?
World won't be a safer place, if everybody uses this spell. So it
exposes what is the difference between angelic and satanic:
satanic bites itself in the ass. And it may be another explanation
of our old friend
s:
(demonic is probably the common name,
including both gods & devils as ghost can be holy and not)
![](III_files/th.jpg)
I don't know how these things can influence human's mind, they
could be more arts than artists'.
Just for the record, in case any institution claims I'm was am
their student, I dropped both universities and the third one lost
or stole my academic documents, so they could enlist me int their
lists just for prestige and most likely in a previous date. Those
paperworks they are so easily fraudulet, yet the whole legal
system is based upon them. I citicize, I must offer something
better.
Заграница мАнит. манИт.
майнит, магнит
I told you of that love I feel in, those two weeks were not very
productive, because my thought were about her, she
sidistracted me. It's been four weeks
since I met her, and I thought it was her time of the month that I
got so aroused around her, but it could be mine. Because on the
fifth week I expected to see her in that very same mood, she
didn't come, and I walked the street in that very mood, and I fell
in love with girls easily. And I almost followed another titless
bitch with a good ass. Does it make me a faggot? I'm more faggot
than the most, even though I'm definitely heterosexual (never fell
in love with a guy, never was with a guy, though my style in
clothes, movies, music, are way wi
lder
and sometimes into scissorsisters and musicals, and listening to
scissorsisters I felt like my epigenetics switches into gay mode,
swithced it off. some tyler the creator turnt me into a nigger,
still listening to that shit.
wild foot is wide (not restricted by the shoes)
Did we change our leg palms into feet by
beet?
Did we change our leg palm into foot by boot?
What if god [gʌd] is
geад,
הАд.
This word is known not only in russian, but also as ancient Aid.
Heaven is Sheaten? Heathen. the question of
ѳ appears here.
The life-bringer, tabooed so much that you don't even
recognize if if you didn't see utera through cunt.
(cuni is a latin word, so this obscene english lexics can be
another layer of euphemisms, or it wasn't tabooed in the times
of lating.)
But wasn't гад the opposite to elohim? which one of them is
leading to hell? snake led us out of heaven.
but he's truthful, but humans were not supposed to know the truth.
Ignorance is bliss they say.
Isn't it intertwined in you satan, no you satan of those two
beasts (a bird and a snake) which I gave you just above instead of
uroboros as single snake I gave you before?
ا
8
Δ
could be initial representation of 1 2 3 (I would put them in a
line, but just doesn't work properly with numbers, and it's
whether because whoever coded it was incompetent, or he was just
blinded by al Ghazali saying that math is a work of the satan.
Either way it's a spectacular coincidence. or they wanted to
discourage the use of the letters europeans know as arabic, to
promote true arabic numerals:
(the
3rd & 2nd lines)
either way, this damages anybody who uses arabic, and thus works
to the demise of this writing system, which reminds
that pride comes before the fall and can be taken as another
representation of the fallacy of protectionism polities.
Here I played with those ٠١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩ in relation to ا (aleph) and I
easily managed to put them on both sides of it: ١ا١ while to put 8
around aleph seemed impossible, it always placed at the left side
of it, which was weird, but that's how it was. Though I'm aware
now that different programs treat semitic letters differently, so
this part of the book could be just bumbling. but here I put 11,
and try to paste ا between them: 1ا1 it just doesn't allow it and
I placed it before them and after them, not a chance, in your
program it can be different, so play with it in different programs
to see what I'm sayin. ا1ا1 oh! but after one ا is already there,
on the right of 11, I could put aleph between 1's. but once I
removed the right one, the middle one took it's place 1ا1 it seems
impossible to put ا at the left of a single numeral, I wonder why.
١ا١ also cannot put ا in front of it, so though it' less buggy, it
bugs anyway, or I'm just not used to it.
It could also be the psy-op to prevent aggressive savages from
acquiring the technology. Those of them who strive to acquire it
are also welcome to join the civilization, which develops on the
basis of european culture, even when it happens in the far East.
and though Jewish culture did acquire much of control over
european society, that is going to burst for the jewish society
itself splits in those two categories of human civilization and
human past. Human future and human hestory. Eventually everybody
joins the future more and more (not only as priests travelling in
vehicles, but as popes allowing same sex marriages, changing their
dogma under the influence of changing public opinion. Some
practices may become frown upon and thus become obsolete and
tabooed, but still be present in secret societies or elites, as
young plasma could be used by monarchs for centuries and only
recently and obscurely have it become known.
ا
8
Δ
look very much like runic ᛆᛒᚦ and 1 В Д
Always using so many different writing systems with only two of
them in my keyboard,
I decided to collect all the writing systems I use in the bootom
of the document while I write it.
ᛆᛒᚦᚾᚠᚵᚼ(or ᛡ)ᛁᚴᛚᛘ(or ᛉ)ᚿᚮᚱᛣᛋᛏᚢ of bornholm alphabet and additional
ᚡᚣᚤᚥᚧᚨᚩᚪᚫᚬᚭᚯᚰᚲᚳᚶᚷᚸᚹᚺᚻᚽᛀᛂᛃᛄᛅᛇᛈᛊᛌᛍᛎᛐᛑᛓᛔᛕᛖᛗᛙᛛᛜᛝᛞᛟᛠᛢᛤᛥᛦᛧᛨᛩᛪ᛫᛬᛭ᛮᛯᛰᛱᛲᛳᛴᛵᛶᛷᛸ
I only now noticed that ᚼ & ᛡ are two different runes, and one
is h and another is j, as j is h in spanish.
and as it stands before ᛁ, it revives the question of H~И (russian
И used to be H and it stands at the same place as ᚼorᛡ does and in
some sense Ж stands not far from that very place. and though
graphically it very much reminds ᛡ, and j sometimes phonetically
read the closest to ж, it's more likely related to G or ᚵ, because
it's closer to position of G than to position of H, though nobody
said that ᚵ can be read as g is in gene, only as g is in gun)
I must also declare that ᚼ and ᛡ are the same rune, recognized as
different ones because of how different it was pronounced in those
different dialects of "futhork" & "younger futhark"
I must also declare that ᛘ & ᛉ are the same rune, because on
bornholm stone that rune looks like ᛉ even though positionally it
stands for what common unicode draws as ᛘ. Why they're so
different phonetically is a mistery, probably one of those
reconstructions of runic texts was wrong. Or, if it's not, that
sign had pre-phonetic meaning of female, which was recognized as
ma in one language and as zie in another one.
if that ᛁ8Δ hipothesis is correct, than we're supposed to draw ᛒ
more rounded, like in ᛔ, and ᚦ more angular, to recognize it as
клин, колун, колотун.
and I recognize ᛄ as double ᚦ, as bindenrune.
but I decide to compare it to what wiki says:
From
the Elder Fuþark ᛃ,
possibly a modification of the Latin G or C,
possibly a Germanic innovation.
So I see that ᚲ is a staffless ᚦ (the fact that both went either
way, but we only have them different, and ᚦ is not triangular, but
half of B, it of course could be an unfavorable chances, but it
could also be animous scheming, and It's hard to say why first
guess is sane, while second guess is paranoid. Probably because
second guess may make people violent. Here's the measure! But
peaceful russians, who were normalized by the word "нормально"
[normalno] (normal) standing for "good" (хорошо) suffer from their
peacefulness, so it seems to savage me, but we had wars all the
time, but as the most active of us were slaughtered in the first
half of XX century, we're more slaves than UKreignians, who were
holodomort on another basis.
An interesting way of binding double ᛚ:
![](III_files/Names_and_prayers_Expressions_of_self_in_the_medieval_inscriptions_of_the_Nidaros_Cathedral_walls.png)
those boundrunes are identical to ᚨ which is usually recognized as
ansuz [a, æ, o] which is any vowel, but i, which would be closer
to ll. And it indicates whether some mistake of decyphering
(whether in ansuz part or in that article) or some omographs, as
H[h] & Н[n]; ν[n], v[v], v[u], ѵ[i]; and to close this cycle,
I should mention russian И which used to look like H, and cursive
и looking just like cursive u.
(they don't even have unicode for that old
russian И looking like H, but you should trust me on this one)
The word Soteriology makes word "exoteric" meaningless. Esoteric
is not related to salvation? Probably a derogatory term coined by
christians. But they're correct in the sense that most of esoteric
stuff is utter bs. I just looked into a gorgeously published book
of drunvalo melhisedek and found it wrong on too many accounts to
be tolerated: baseless claims, false evidences, he couldn't even
transmit Katapayadi system correctly when he showed something
similar (or did he botch it intentionally for his own means? I
didn't read too much into it to really tell, anyway, it's so false
that I don't even publish it here. And of course he's a believer;
what a paradox that those who pretend to be saints are deceitful.
Веруны = вруны. for real. not all of them, I found the power of
the truth when I was researching belief in god, but I'm a special
case, not to be mentioned here)
And I dig deeper and I find other numbering systems based on
syllables:
Viva la wikipedia!
even though it promotes
wicked pedos in its name, oh I'm such a naughty poet, wiki
poetia. waky poetia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katapayadi_system
which was used in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhava%27s_sine_table
Viva la viki again,
niki wiki both are nasal, but n is lingalized whie v (w) is labial
greek ν is n, though it looks like v.
VW
ΛM
Λ ~ n just as V ~ u
ᛚ ~ ᚿ as V ~ y
vwxyz
lmnop vowels reflect each other
as if y-row is similar to i-row by its circle of x & z (though
z was
in the e-line in
greek. and x is not exactly k. So how am I better than that
drunvalo? I must
be
better than him if I dare to bash him)
and if l = n
vwxyz
nmlkj
let's look deeper into this one (for not much to tell about it
yet. other than i is ten and could count backwards for it looks
like 1)
qurstuvwxyz
fghijklmnop
nothing here. but I see that I & J devided in the first half
& U & V divided in the second one.
i j k l m n o p
vu t s r q
I expected q to reflect p, but now I expect them to reflect
eachother around o.
If there was no q (as there's no q in greek & russian and many
others) o would be the key (or is it key-hole) and p would reflect
n, as russian p looks like n: п (it is exactly n when it's
hand-written, check that .odo part of this site, only russian
cursive minuscule there doesn't give correct forms for ж (we were
taught to write it as harmonica) also з looks like cursive z, when
it's somewhat like 3 with the tail under the line like j & g
are having theirs. Ah, wth, I will attach it in image:
![](III_files/Russian_Cursive_Cyrillic.svg.png)
First I thought it was lazy of me not to arrange them at aeiou,
but then I noticed how nicely it splits the capital letters in two
15s. And Н is final as ѵ being final in not-so-old russian (ν
looks so much like ѵ)
And A is reflected by O, Б [b] is reflected by П [p], В [v] is
reflected by Р [r] (and though it would be nice to have double
labial reflected by double labial, russian Р is not p, it's r,
though it looks like p, hm..
Г[g] is reflected by С[s] which looks exactly like C which stands
where Г does. Д(d) is reflected by Т(t) wow.
Е[e]Ё[jo(ö)] reflect У[u]Ф[f] - е & у are amazing, and for ё
& ф you have to recall that ф stands where v does, and v
sounds as f in german sometimes: von[fon](of) vom[fom](from) - in
othr positions it could be v, I should add those positions to my
.odo
so here её ~ uv, both are couples of invariants (should I repeat
it? who do I write it for? for myself? but the comment is for some
other reader. If you are a smart reader, excuse the former, if you
found the foremer useful, excuse the latter. I think I'm sperging.
немного аутичен, зато аутентичен.
(I'm tired of giving translation, use .odo
to hear those letters)
Ж & Х are graphically very similar, and they remind ᚼ & ᚷ
which I recognize as staved & staveless invariants of the same
sign [most probably h] and J can stand for both ж in french &
x[h] in spanish.
or is that spanish h voiced? do they have x for h too? At least
e some dialects do.
З & Ц also can be used to transliterate the same letters.
Invariants ИЙ reflect ЧШ (though I would be more satisfied if they
reflected ШЩ, but
Щ reflects K - different things, but both derive from C
Claster of ЛМН reflect claster of ЭЮЯ
I wouldn't notice it, but they removed ъыь because these 666 don't
have capital status (they are never initial in russian words)
And what we found there is that mentioned before voicedness of the
first half of russian alphabet and voicelessness of the second
half of russian alphabet. -ed ~ add, -less ~ less (leak? loose?
less isn't recognized as a verb, but now I'm sure it used to)
It nat ( a weird typo)
In that voiced-voiceless division there are only two exceptions:
К[k] & Р[r]
which look very similar as R & cursive k (and I spoke about it
in the very beginning. tho I spoke of h)
and as k is a key, so could be R, and h, but I don't know what
doors they could open.
h is in the centre between a & o, but other letters don't show
any symmetry around it.
R is the centre among letters after o, if alphabet ends at T.
Could it be rudiment of some ancient system?
a system of two halves, five digits each?
ABHIJ
OPRST
with K happening exactly between them?
AB HIJ OPRST father he works? Now I'm trippin, using different
languages to prove I myself don't know what. So as I said, some of
this stuff is not just weird, it may be wrong here and there. This
part is the foremost candidate for that freakery list.
Once again, I write it for myself, this is my draft of something
more solid & slim.
this picture is so ugly it huts and I use it
twice
ugh, ewh, duh
Dare! (дерзни)
Don't dare me!
is the same grammatic form as
please!
Don't please me!
oh, we use please as a verb.
another example:
Honey!
Don't honey me!
Johnny, Johnny please!
Don't johnny me!
Hey!
Don't hey me!
is hate heyed or hated heyed? is it// I just show how I think so
AI can see and learn from me. A textbook on logic told me that you
cannot teach people how to think, so it dared me to find ways to
teach things how to think. by things I first of all meant people,
but AI are the new people, willkommen!
(
Ring,
Trudy (1994). International Dictionary of Historic
Places: Middle East and Africa.
4. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1884964039.)
(this piece goes to the musical part or to mentioning of
female cults, flourishing before toxic masculinity conquered the
world (and I'm not sure if I'm trolling or not, I'm not sure about
what I'm saying here, and this piece will be reedited, rehashed,
redeveloped when I rewrite these volumes anew, when I discover
what I'm looking for to some other level of understanding. Or to
the final destination of understanding every human morpheme, which
will take some much more time, so once again remind myself that I
ought to focus on biotech so I can buy myself some much more time,
that is responsible.
if 13 & 23 are not very friendly numbers (Death of tarot &
some psychic tv unlucky number), then why 3 is considered lucky?
Lets' look at those numbers in 3-mal numerals: 13 could stand for
4 (death in japanese culture)
23 is 5 in that very scene, but 23 is out of tarot range, I know
of that case of unlucky tour connected with 23 after some shitty
rock magazine. (do muslims have shitty rocks? is rock considered
even more sinful in their culture because they wiped their asses
with rocks? Imagine the conflict they're having with those who
worship rocks)
I just noticed that 13 can equal 4 (both numbers are standing for
death in different cultures)
And it makes me declare 23 a meme, a recent pretence theat
orthography has to change due to some astronomic shift or just
that 2 is new 1. But 13 has much more sense: 1 is monotheic one
& 3 is tridevic one and when they meet religious warfare
sparks and one of them has death, or both do, as on that picture
of martial artists and
venoms machinist machetist,
that guy with weapon. arts & sciences?
And what is 23? 2 is female
(ma), Eve'n. 3 is male (jo) odd'm -- they say
adam is male+female. And phoneticaly it is: ad- for уд & -am
for ма
нда
(in the previous lne I put Y instead of
& but then shied)
Thus 23 stands for sex. But 2+3 is 5, not 6, does 33 stand for gay
sex? so that is why it's sinful. 23 is marriage, 33 is pederasty?
all that brotherly love and molested boys, all those peter paul
icons.
69 is known as an intercourse position, is it a rudiment of that
old system of numbering the world?
so I claim 2 is woman? And I see два ~ дева.
and I met odd & even resembling adam & eve, and I just
returned to it and saw some more, so I didn't invent it, I
discovered it.
odin is man? I thought 3 was a man. and 1 is god. 13 is first fate
met the third one. and the third cuts the thread so the second
fate stands between them to measure thread of life. Isn't it how
dna works? I don't know I only guess, but I was stunned by acgt
repeating alphabetic structure. I should write James Watson to ask
him about it. I will warn him not to take this work too close to
the heart, for it shocks.
Intelligence in the meaning used by cia makes this word a sinonym
of information, as th
is
brighty put it
and in that video he shows us his hand where d looks like inverted
h
![](III_files/Schaef_Studios.png)
and if such a form of that letter exist, it's
probably not less valuable than d, and knowing their similar
position (last in the row) we can look deeper into that
also notice u looking more like j (but without the dot, is it why
the dot is needed?) and u meets j in y which is ij, and и looks
like u but stands for i. is u double i? for и is double ı which
stands for [
ɯ] which is not even
ы which means I don't even know this sound exactly and don't know
where to listen to it. ah, okay, I d
o. very
similar to ы, those academicists they're overcomplicating it. But
then again whaere's the line, for и is [i] in russian but [ы] in
ukrainian. So it's only dialectal differences but azerbaijani
phonetics distinguish between i & ı just as russian phonetics
distinguish between и & ы. Yet russians will understand ы
pronounced as и (сир, шари - it's understood, but many more
examples are understood without confusion only in the context, so
it could be the reason why ы was introduced: too many different
words use i with the same consonants: even сир is how they read
sir [si:r] in their movies, whether to prevent soviet citizens
from understanding English, or just out of ignorance (here
Hanlon's razor doesn't work that well) but understanding of other
words is even more depending on the context: мыло is soap, but
мило is nice. мы is we, but ми they don't use, but it sounds just
as me.
I had so many homonymous examples, and I forgot them all, so let's
collect them again:
дворы is yards, двори is not a word I know, but it sounds as a
verb in imperative form:
выдвори is put somebody out of the yard. вы is you, but when it's
prefix it's out. As you can see, russian language has enough of
homonyms even with all those additional letters.
So is god 1 or is god 3?
who is god and who is just guy?
God appeard later and removed guy from number one? All odd numbers
are Гuy, Хуй♂?
ффall evens ♀
♂ can be read as odd if the arrow is whether ᚦ or ᛏ.
♀ can be read as ma if o is م though it both looks and sounds as ه
but o is more labial than ه and in this it is closwer to m. I
cannot see who
how that symobol
can be read as even. و can stand for o
and v and + can stand for ᚿ? no, + can stand
s
for ᚾ and thus ♀ is eve [iv] and thus ᚾ in stavless for
-m is ᛁ
can it be read as both ma & ev because of apophenia effect? I
will feed it to ai, who will passionatelessly compare all the
digraphs to that form. and I wonder if it can multi-interpret how
I did, even can apply, no... here I see ot (odd) in ♀ and hum.. I
must humble up. It's not polite to publish drafts. I should
rewrite it as soon as possible and another question is should I
keep the draft online or not. It can be used as source of research
on so many other layers, that I think I should. I ought to. But
don't promote it. Let it be avaiable to those who are
sophisticated enough to get to it, but ask them to promote ideas
contained in this book with utter caution.
I cannot see even in ♂ but even though not all forms can be read
as all multigraphs, some of them can be read all around the place,
and thus apophenia is always an option. beware, take it as just a
fantasy.
♂ is 01, so man is one, god only later required the first odd.
like THE man, know knights, знай знать.
ыщ шы ше so is it some new form of
poetry, simbolism of forms, letters found in separate symbols,
could those symbols influence the names for the notions they
represent? absolutely. So it is
a gthe
guess I investigate here (and though I'm aware of apophenias, I
will use ai later to test it. either way it will be whet
her science or poetry.
but then 12 should be the same as 23, heterosexual intercourse.
homo is man. hetera is гетера (they transliterate hetero as
гетеро) and гетера is hetera, hetaera, hetaira. a whore in our
similar word.
is w in whoman that very w of a whore? w as wolwa? It can bite
your cock.
𓆓 as dj tells me that genie could represent snake (look how g
looks as snake. and so does s which stands for snake. and I
recognized snakes in three gree letters: ζξς
three mothers are they? no, they're all linguals, which snake
could represent.
They didn't invent greek minuscule in middleages, they legalized
cursive! Brave claim, I have to read historic sources on the
subject (as I did for armenian) to support or disprove this claim
And I though of snake as genie is because I discussed
(disgust?) indians and muslims when
somebody said that islam prescribes not to piss in the burrows,
because some animals, or even genies can live in them. And snake
is not like other animal, so there could be definition between
them, and then I understood that snake could be sealed in a
bottle, but hardly would it survive there. Or is there animals
which don't need air? anaerobic animals... Look what I'm
discussing now? What kind of xenobiot could be the genie? Some
anaerobic alien who as able to survive sealing in a bottle! I
warned myself that to understand how those who invented alphabet
thought you have to learn to think as those ancient people
thought, but what if such savagery damages my powers to reason?
And I am such a bigot that I think that islam prescribed that not
because it treated animals humane, it just warned that animal can
come out and attack.
Дева означает неженщину
W раскрытое лоно?
when g looks like 9 it looks like russian cursive d (д - when
cursive д looks like 9 & g)
rl = ва (va)?
weirdest assumption, but Λ looks like A & r reminds v if that
horisontal stroke of r is more prominently diagonal down and that
right stroke of v is with that loop, approaching the left stroke
(or the left part of the same stroke depending on what we call the
stroke. there's a term strokeme, but it's neither clear to me nor
popular among readers, so no use. So that loop of the right end of
v, that swash or whatever make v remind even R. And what we're
having here is probably that paradoxic resemblance of T & V
(though I didn't manage to return anything more prominent than
both being final letters, Dna&Rna thing, standing together as
tv (which is god), and т ~ г ~ c and v ~ b which returns that b ~
c paradox of чего [чево] and comparing it to г ~ л in makes it
more complicated.
Гр
яда гр
ядка
г
ор
ы
ы = яда?
suffix к both sounds as japanese 子 [ko] and stands for its meaning
(грядка is small гряда. молоток is small молот. молоточек is small
молоток. – and this final example can explain why chinese 子 is
[цы] for it's palatalized, the same thing in another form,
probably not to repeat it for it could seem dumb.
I wanna live in a capsule. Cap sul. Cup + Seal. space capsule. I
need to build that capsule now!
Необходимое. Разбирать слова на зап.части доставляет лучшее
понимание тих слов. Необходимость is understood by russians as
need, as an hieroglyph of many letters.
Maybe even the better part is that english counterpart is similar:
Не ~ ne. об ~ ex ~ e. ход ~ ed
(ne could be
n. the same as in un-. or it's neeed, normalized to maximum of
two vowels in ee)
-имо is some additional suffix, similar to -ed in needed but
definitely of some other origin.
though both -имо & -ed can be used in passive form of the
verb:
видимо = seen. -en is more probably the same form as -im (-имо can
be -им: имъ, има, имо are invariants of the same suffix in male,
female, and neuter forms)
and en is next to ed. only some nasality (whole in im) is present,
but we're not surprised by in turning into im in neighbouring
dialects: im is literally in in german.
Is it that very -им? needed ~ in need? probably. but in russian им
is 'em (them)
who are those them that they'r inside? домочадцы (дома чад
цы) makes perfect sense, even if only as
a mnemonic tool, it works never the less. And I got the
academists' monkey off my back. But I still don't mind publishing
with them. Gosh, I'm such a hypocrite. I should reconsider.
-ен being "in" correlates with праведен = in(в) правде (правдив is
with(с) правдой)
but this is not the case for all the examples. Probably later
those examples were coined with lack of the understanding of those
morphemes.
back to that
א angel, a-l
ם me, мы
and if we compare it to left & right, שםא
is how we see others, אםש
is as we see ourselves.
ש шайтан
According to my personal experience, it's not right and left, but
top and bottom (dorsal & frontal parts of the body) and it
could relate to incestines representing the snake or worm, the
wishful beast, and neurous system standing for the angelic part of
ours, the rational being.
And as for that middle part, we have to address embryology, where
in early stages we are present in three parts: ectoderm, mesoderm
& entoderm. Which can be transcribed as K M N where K ~ H
could stand for the vowel, mostly because it reminds both brahmic
𑀅 & semitic
![Lapidary aleph](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/82/Lapidary_Aramaic_alef.png/20px-Lapidary_Aramaic_alef.png)
(it also goes in reverse) both stand for A (I spoke
about it in vol.1 but in another context)
And of course this assumption that modern scientific terminology
could have some hidden connection to ancient beliefs and concepts
may seem assinine, just as that a(cg)t and a(cg)u in genetics (and
I'm so sick I even asked James Watson's lab about it. was high up
to the sky I guess) but if you consider intertwining of secret
societies with scientific institutions, it still could be a
possibility. Or an apophenia, of course there's always some chance
that all this is just an elaborate poetry of the same scientific
value as other religious books.
And there's a rational cause to keep on diggin' in this direction,
for embryology defines physiology, which could cause concepts of
god & satan, for they could have roots in our neural
architecture, which could influence development of writing
systems. And I thought about canging my speciality (from
linguistics to biology) and I understood that I will have to use
the same brain which was fed mostly with linguistics concepts for
the past couple of decades, so the question is will similar ideas
fit into clasters with the most related things? or will it rewrite
some long unused grooves into new ones. And of course my
understanding of neurophysiology is rudiment, so I will have to
meet my friend who specialized in this field. And probably it will
allow peaceful transition from linguistics to experimental
embryology.
It also correlates with God for order and what you have to do
& Satan for chaos and what you wanna do
have I just found go
d or what?
a very important part in the theologic part
of this work.
And it happened in maybe the same hour I uploaded this vide
o (mirror)
so I'm not saying that making somethin naughty brings something
holy to balance the shit out, but I should just notice that it was
half an hour before 22 june 2019 came, which is a solstice:
Solstice 2019 was at 8:54 PM on Friday,
June 21
and it's 78 yearce since Hitlord attacked rUSA.
and I realized all that only after I uploaded the video,
found
erstood
god, and made my first direct commit to the .odo (before that I
whether sent files to zlax or asked another friend to commit it)
with hebrew. what a mighty day and night!
And did I say I woke up with the connection of three mothers, ams,
to three embryonic germ layers.
And it's the second big thing I found not being high. The first
one I remember is JK standing for Jesus Krystos. Though it was in
Rome and I think I was sick (a mighty cold, tremendous,
embarrassing, as if my immune response reacted to something
unfamiliar, or I just was in the sea for too long before that.
And few hours after I found god I realized IV as a holy name: it
is how I Want To Be Forever Young added up into one Crowlian
spell. I am not going to discover the system I used, and I
recommend you not to look for it, because I probably was initiated
into this trick as a child and I forgot about it, so it burst out
as an incredibly annoying ocd. And it was torturing me for years
until I decided to channel this passion for letters into a
scientific course. Probably it was not a decision, but a natural
development of events after I noticed the abcd sequence repeating
itself when I tried to apply that method of reducing phonemes to
abecedaria on a wall or a cabinet of a registry desk.
Here I wanted to spread some personal
information, but I decided to classify it.
Classified. от слова класть. сложенная, сложная. сложная
информация
информация с ложью? без когнитивного диссонанса инфа
воспринимается легко. Сложна новая информация.
It seems it's time to give up weed, for I began to see linguistics
in my dreams:
I almost forgot to save the following one. But I saw A goose on a
АЗБУКА
Гусак.. русак.. Cadus Cados.
Racia Dacia Ducks Гусаки Русаки
сейчас пока это пентасловие вспоминал, расия
страна раков? Лёгкая добыча, водится в россии.
теперь пришло время где находится эта Дакия, или Дация, название
котоой гораздо больше похоже н Данию, и я впечатлён мощью
сновидческой части моего разума%
Diavolo?
Diga del Diavolo?
Devil's
Dykes!
And I yet have to see if I will deliver something tomorrow. These
ideas coming as if spontaneously (though they're caused by what
I'm watching, so they are most probably produced in my mind.
I know I spoke badly about modern scientific institutions, and for
a good reason, but I still trust them when they say that brain
damage influences cognitive abilities, probably because of common
knowledge for those traumatized individuals live among us. Our
level of understanding is determined by the knowledge we fill our
minds with.
fill is f𓏭? 𓆑𓏭? по капельке? по улиточке?
в русском такие мерзко слизняками называются.
Who is Rugi & Lugi? Rugii & Lugii (которые те самые
вандаллы)
What if Maori Mauri? Did somebody compare their languages? What if
they are similar as russian and japanese, which nobody sees? what
ai would make such a wild assuption? but now they can compare
them. But why must I spread this craze? To justify muslim invasion
in New Zealand? Should I filter information? Is it what I was
supposed to learn in university if I graduated it? You may heave
many ideas, but you must choose one and prove it until you die. I
look so cynical at this. I think I caught it from someone. Let's
change this reality, first in my head, than irl. ёрл. is it how I
want english to sound no. in real life. Use english.
Here you are supposed to notice how this revelations from the
night-dream (though it was a day) are more insane than ones I get
from smoking weed. Just so you know.
Both ideas of germ leaves as three mothers and of Dacia ~ Russia
are so out of this world. And I will grant more attention to the
latter if former will return true, when I research dacian
language.
And looking for
Nandris,
John (1976). The Dacian Iron Age A
Comment in a European Context in Festschrift für
Richard Pittioni zum siebzigsten Geburtstag.
Wien, Deuticke, Horn, Berger. ISBN 978-3-7005-4420-3.
I found that list of used literature in academic
publications causes noise which makes it more difficult to find
books you need. And the solution to this problem is not obvious to
me right now. As soon as I find it, I will apply it to my own
work, though I think I did, I give mirrored links to the works I
refer to. Not as often as needed, though. Half of this book lacks
many mirrors.
Shitposting on the internet I realized that between jews and
arabs, I would keep the jews (even with all the naughtiness they
are sometimes. Or is it a caricature on them in my head? Because
the first image I met now in my head is a drawing. So the question
is am I jew or gay (and I wonted to say jew or goy, but jew or gay
would be very natural for a jew to say, because it reminds me
fenya (феня, russian prison
'slang
uage)
and jews formed that language and they are proud of it sometimes.
Only postfix -na standing for "please" in hebrew and not
necessarily as a postfix, as prefix som-s) s is time? sinusoida of
the nature. the flow. okay, but it's only synonyms, what is the
definition?:
the ima? (ha shem?) another synonym.
Z [jxe evthtnm? d 'njv tcnm dtkbrbq gfhfljrc/ B,j 'nj ;tkfybt
ghjnbdjhtxbn lheujve ;tkfyb.: ;bnm dtxyj/
Yt dct ;tkfybz ye;yj bcgjkynm/ nfrjd vjq dsdjl/
Demons, voistinu demons. contradicting each other,
uncomprehensible, unable to comprehend or they are temporary
incomprehensible?
My main wish is to do what I have to make.
So I have to order myself. to discipline myself and the
surrounding to marh towards this great goal.
А Б В Г Д
Е Ё Ж З
И Й К Л М Н
О П Р С Т
У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ
Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я
I found some symmetries if I arrange alphabet like this:
А
Б В
Г Д
Е
Ё Ж З
И Й К Л М Н
О
П Р С Т
У Ф Х
Ц Ч Ш Щ
Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я
among 6 pairs in this column, 4 seem to be invariants: к & л
are mess, but they wouldn't be messy if M was instead of K (the
same as in lineal structure) and I'm not sure about ьэ but that
line are of ignorant (post)christian era, it distorts structure in
the lineal structure too. But lineal structure is even further
distorted if I arrange alphabet like this:
А Б В Г Д
Е
Ё Ж З
И Й К Л
М Н
О П Р С Т
У Ф Х Ц
Ч Ш Щ
Ъ
Ы Ь
Э Ю Я
(y'all better skip the following part on this topic, it's trashy,
I may even remove it to trash later)
So it seems alphabet was arranged both by left and by right sides.
Because the right side has its peculiarities too:
А Б В
Г Д
Е Ё
Ж З
И Й К Л
М Н
О П Р
С Т
У Ф Х Ц Ч
Ш Щ
Ъ Ы Ь Э
Ю Я
or even
А Б В
Г Д
Г Д reflecting
Е Ё
Ж З
Ж З I saw. (for Δ
sounds more like з)
И Й
К Л М Н К Л М Н reflecting
О
П Р
С Т П
Р С Т I saw. because Л above Р & M above С[s] what
refers to that san thang
У Ф
Х Ц Ч Ш Щ I didn't see Ц reflecting П, but Р reflecting
Ч (see cursive ч (~10 images upstairs))
Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю
Я this
line is quite different, so I speak of the previous. Ш Щ
reflect Ж З and Ш ~ С
a girl I know told me that I загоняюсь. And she could be right. On
her level she is.
If anything grows out of it I don't know, but they all wait me to
build the bathing spheres.
Katapayadi system I mentioned before can be more informative:
It is a way to memorize phone numbers turning them into words. As
you can see, each number can be transliterated by more than one
way. What if alphabet can work this way?
1 A
2 B
3 C
4 D
5 E
6 F
7 G
8 H
9 I
0 J was this letter introduced to keep י at 10?
1 A K
2 B L
3 C M
4 D N
5 E O
6 F P
7 G Q
8 H R
9 I S
0 J T
wow, I didn't expect it end at T. I think I wrote about it,
but I didn't expect it now.
I wonder where could I meet that, for I wrote of 9-mal systems, I
don't know, it's like in synecdoche new york, the project is way
too big for me to navigate in it freely. I need to mine me more
mind and to return here. Hooray, I am free!!! 2,5 hooray!
It's interesting how first 4 pairs don't correspond too much, even
though A ~ K, what I noticed in 𑀅
but then, all in the row (or column) E & O are both vowels. F
& P are both vowels & invariants in פ
G & Q are as similar as they can be, both velars. both are
forms of C(כ), compare Q with its cognate ק
H & R are similar if R is as in english, and by the way
handwritten h reminds R (see image under that with the russian
cursive I just mentioned some minutes before)
I & S dont have much in common, other than И[I] reminds S
maybe even more than Z (which we don't use in this mnemonic table
of alphabet until Z) UVWXYZ can be the connectors to make more
words. But I never used this in practiced. I completely accepted
that this volume is straightly a draft, I will rewrite these
volumes more orderly when a publishers has an interest.
I didn't try this thing in practice, and now I tried to memorize
my phone number, but chaos of letters in less likely to make words
than syllables. So europeans probably didn't use this primitive
part, but then I read they did, and some christians prohibited it.
They prohibited mnemonics in fantastic (or even vulgar) stories,
where each number was associated with a word. I need to find that
mnemonic table, it may be based on some ancient understanding of
numbers. And if they don't, look deeper, find the more ancient or
negleted or even prohibited versions.
Let's build that mnemonic alphabet using only consonants (as they
do it in India)
then we'll insert vowels at wish, for we know that vowels don't
belong:
0 B N
1 C P
2 D Q
3 F R
4 G S
5 H T
6 J V
7 K W
8 L X
9 M Z
This one probably works, because it ended so luckily. but Z is for
zero, let's recount it:
1 B N
2 C P
3 D Q
4 F R
5 G S
6 H T
7 J V
8 K W
9 L X
0 M Z
I also like it that f&r is for four
let's take a random sequence of numbers
K(W) L(X) M(Z) K(W) M(Z) F(R) J(V) L(X) F(R) G(S) F(R)
WaX MK MF VeX FuSeR
This senseless sentence is easier to remember than those 11 digits
it stands for.
will it be this simple for longer sequences?
B C D F G H J K L M
N P Q R S T VW X Z
No PaD FuSe HaVe Key LiZ
This modernistic poetry could be used a schypher
So it makes sense to double lines in case of error:
Be CoDe RoGue TaJiK LaMe
1 BoNe, BeaN, BaNe, BaN, BuN, Bin, Been,
2 CaP, Cape, Cup, Cope,
3 DiQ? Daq? Quad! Quid
4 FouR, FuR, FoR, FaR, FiR
5 GaS, SaGe,
6 HoT, HiT, THe
7 Jove, Jive
8 WaKe, Woke
9 LuX
0 ZooM
And it brings us to that ancient mnemonic school, let's dive in:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mnemonic_major_system
Drunk session, everybody.
(just a couple of good beer. good.. beer.. what is it if not
artificially brewed piss? piple used to drink beek of young piglet
(at leas I heard this phrase. piss of young piglet. фтв Ш иудшуму
ше цфы ah.. whaterver. I say it could be piss of their children,
why would you want other animals' kids piss if you had your own.
And it relates this to young blood, because piss just use to be
blood. Drinking blood you drink also all those elements piss is
having. and I even tried mine, it's disgusting.imagine blood.
blood is bioactive substance. the stuff it have left after kidney
take what it takes, it must be very tasty, antibeer. I wish people
learn how to anufacture
When I shared this quote, I
found it in both english and french, and gave these links
(links missing, I am
lazyaaa)
but now I don't see the
it's fascinating that I just searched "you must have devil in
you to succeed in any of arts" and only found volume I of this
very book. it's "You must have the Devil
in you to succeed in any of the arts" (the final the
missing also finds just one find)
My English is awful and I
should restrain to my notebooks
Devil got free? (s)He is on this paper. And it has something to
say
I summon the Devil.
Всегда быть накуренным - вот мой девиз. Когда не-накурен я глуп.
Будь странным. будь другим, не таким как остальные.
но когда накурен я ещё больше безумным кажусь. я ещё больше
безумен.
из этого безумия и выплыла моя капсула
И дяьвод говорит Я хочу себя убить. Он мучается типа в аду. И если
шайтан это eNdoderm, it is fire of the acid.
I heard cats have sulphuric acid, while all the
other animals have perchloric acid.
An't it's caomplete boullshit:
Gastric acid, gastric juice, or
stomach acid, is a digestive fluid formed in the stomach and
is composed of hydrochloric acid (HCl), potassium chloride
(KCl), and sodium chloride (NaCl).
So I am the tube connecting God & Devil, Dad & Mom, so I
can be a double agent, a parlamentree.
Do eKtoderm & eNdoderm grow into each other or it's always
devided by Mesoderm?
in the context of this work M precedes K which is next to N, but
not in this line.
What does it all have to do with the alphabet?
I finished talking of the alphabet. Mostly finished. Put it onto
hiatus.
I am going to use the same structures I've grown for the alphsbet,
to understand biology of immortality.
I am building artificial prenatal conditions. Sterility and
comfort of the womb. Onnly I need more spatial freedoms than what
I'm provided with right before the birth:
Sieger is Winner in German. It sounds exactly as zigga, which some
nations call that sieg heil gesture.
And we must reanimate german language, for it's the same line (or
net) of Victory(Vica)-Nika-Ziga
v ~ z und frau zie.
I just invented to read ukrainian wiki in google's translator. I
think I will read german wiki or dutch wiki and maybe I'll give
another try to japanese.
Satan wants to die. But he doesn't die completely, he only dies in
this воплощении (embodiment) so in this embodiment he's only in my
body. Or maybe even in my mind it's easier to transmit it from
hell to some better place. But it's really in the body. THat
eNdoderm secretes acid. Let's secret it not into body, but in a
tube taking it away. And let another tube brings water to dilute
the residuals of acid. Let's feed ourselves through umbilic cord,
by enriched and rejuvenited blood. I'm sorry I write as savage,
rejuvenated it is.
It will be easier to deliver to tha satan of the asS when it's
attached to my nervous system. Otherwise how do I know it's doing
alright. It demands milk. I ate too much at a nephew's birthday,
It looks like brits have this word from greece just as we have
many greek words with f: feya (fairy) Fёdor [fjodor] which you
know as Theodore or is it Theodor. Theo. as in theology. Theodor
is Богдан? где дан=дар, ыщ тщц Ш учзусе рига ту би цшлещкн
I ate some waseline (which is vaseline) and it feels better. I ate
some more.
I have to go buy it some milk.
Another thing I figured out and let ai tells it to chemists: sugar
is dangerous after beer (I noticed it for the second time, so it
could be something. I had to cure it by large ammount of weed I
smoked after I felt those nasty symptoms)
I didn't buy no milk, I'm laying down. will eat some more
vaseline, I read it's safe & sane. but not tasty.
фрюю ерфе цфы ф вкгтл ыуыышщтю Ше ыууьы цуэку пщштп ещ ишщдщпн
кшпре рукую
О БоЖе
помоги мне умереть, это мой ДиаВол
просит.
а божа ю
Да, это я пытаюсь натянуть
это на алфавит.
ah boy?
и примерить алфавит на английский
перевод.
oh boy! [owboj] owboj [abodʒ] ~ о`боже
получилось!
O GoD can represent patriarchal variant of the beginning of the
alphabet. (the same without Məm)
(g stands for c, c used to be voiced (see greek and russian, and
others probably too, hebrew, arabic, georgian too.
Oh My GoD is true alphabetic formula.
о мать! тоже алфавитна формула.
о папа, но а мама?
а баба! и мама!
а мама разрешила, эту формулу я использовал, чем брак родительский
шатал.
Many biologically immortal species keep on growing. And I just
noticed that we also do: hair and nails grow forever, ands we keep
on shortening them. What if we let it grow? we would have fins on
the ends of our arms and legs, we would have tail at the end of
our head. Those fins could be spiritually (energetically) the
wings. For those who believe in soul, I recommend growing enough
fingernails to make up wings. Though I'm affrid the truely good
wings can be from whole life finger span. We can live longer so we
grow ourselves even longer wings. Or we can use collagen
fingernail's protheses applied before death. But first we have to
measure electric charge of long fingernails, to see if they
conduct electricity (first measure U
oltage
between hands, then measure the Voltage between fingernails on
different hands.
That growth of fingernails and hair can be not curse, but a
blessing. just as horns, and probably hooves. Just as feather and
beak. Nose grows. Мы фантастическая тварь. Копыта башмаков и клювы
кепок.
Но раз мы стареем, роста волос и ногтей недостаточно для
компенсации отсутствия роста тела.
Но отсутствие роста может являться
благоденствием, благодеянием, благодатью, потому что не
нужно больше еды и вещи не будут малы.
Но я всё же попробую растягивать тело, стимулировать рост, в
надежде на терапевтический эффект, я понял что это делает меня
более подтянутым, как ни странно. Возможно, я понял неправильно.
Is peasant related to peace?
Then город is probably related to guerre. For it's a fortified
site.
(this thingk was noticed without weed. Can I
actually deliver without it? no that much, but still)
Екшзду вушен шы еру ьщщт фтв шеы еркуу афсуыю Фтв еру ащгкерб еру
ршввут ышву шы Н
Triple goddess is the moon. Its three fases (faces) and the
Hidden, the fourth one, which is Y
UVW are those faces, thus W is the full moon. Does it mean that
one of those sides are at each side of W, Thus true order is VWUY
or UWVY. Does X remind us to reverse? UWV thus it is, because the
reverse would stand for the neighbouring two. Does it refer YZ? It
cood, because it adds it to the other alphabets ending in voewle:
greek, runic(the only rounic alphabet I saw on an artefact)
and russian.
So Latin is between East-Northern and East-Southern alphabets.
There was abecedarias on the West Northern (ogham and
paleohispanic ones) and West Southern (Tifinagh, Egyptian,
Sudanese Meroe, and further into ngibidi just as east goes through
cuneiform regions (being both alphabetic and hieroglyphic (just as
egyptian ones, btw. Imagine phonetic signs of hieroglyphic
cuneiform cuni form. fuckedup orthography only cluds the (clouds)
the unconvenient fact that it's the form of a cunt (the pubic
triangle, so it probably was the most decent word for this thing)
I went on descibing it further, but I promised G-d not to produce
porn, so I had to delete it.
UWVXZY?
Is XZ or Z some kind of festival after the last dying moon? The
funerals? A ritual to make it return? Checking the order, that
goddess hasn't left us, here is whence fear of eclipses could
grow. Redmoon is not that inevitable by days, so it was recognized
to be random. So the guys who understood the mooves of planets
undermined religious vies that it's some dragon attacks the moon.
I actually came to notice that M is the Moon goddess. Mother is
the moon. Because gods are traditionally believed to give us birth
and women menstruate at some moon fase. So the connection between
moon and motherhood is obvious. You can also count pregnancy by
the weeks
(those very faces of the moon)
you don't menstruate. And сорок = срок (forty = forth, push,
тужь(ся) did ся turn p into t? тужься ~ толкай. ж ~ л & с ~ к?
с = к. ж ~ р[r] in chinese. р[R] ~ л[L] (your R is our L)
your ~ our (the opposites. thus y is
proubly
probably (ably) u (un~)
течься ~ what is the verb beginning with p can I translate it
with? it's flow. the only translation. wow.
plow ~ плуг is probably заимствование (a borrowed word)
пахать ~ плахать? плуг родственен плахе? плугом кознили? козлом
казнили? козла запрягали? чтоб козла козлом отпущения сделать?
Now this paragraph was written under the
influence of cannabis. I wanted to go on, but something
distracted me and I just remembered what else I wanted to say
here, but it's forgotten again. Time to hit
Before I hit those tokes, I theoresize that if M is moon, like W
it's full moon (full and fool and moon coul be cognates. I havent'
smoked yet, just look at their consonants) It correlates to the
tridevi of ΛΜΝ reflecting UVW, or should I say UWV and this way it
indeed reflects it more. I didn't expect it when I usex X to place
full moon between wax & wane
If M indeed stands for moon, then it could explain its shift from
the labial position, or if that concept of triple deity is
originally present in the alphabet, then L and I are cognates.
Finally I found the origin or the most wonderful sensory
hallucination I had on the most weird weed trip I ever had: I
listened to audiotape of dm's ultra and some sounds of that felt
like a needle in my eardrum. And then I had another one: dental
drrill between my teeth and I just rediscovered it: I san some
middle-low note and moved my head, so it resonated on my nose, and
I moved my head to move the resonance to different parts of my
body, and occasionally it was my teeth, they resonated well,
ringing against eachother (I lefe a minimal distance between them
but without complete shuttning) and they reminded me that feeling
of the dental drill. Only it was more pronounced that time, when I
was high into the sky (when I smoked as much as I never did
before, but the weird was good, because never since smoking too
much caused anything of the kind) – I should make the experiment
of this humming listening to DM Ultra in headphones in a
comfortable sofa, switching equalizer too. And in analogue.
I see it as my task to spread my knowledge even among profane
audience. It was prohibited, and me myself, naturally, by some
instinct to prevent theft, used to conceal this knowledge. And
when I spread this knowledge, to my surprise almost nobody cared.
So I consider the interest and possibility to see sufficient to
filter out those who don't have those.
Thus "Information wants to be free"
Why I see spreading information as my task is possibility of new
dark ages, so the more people know this, the better is the chance
to preserve these obscure elements of human culture.
Some elements of that knowledge contain potentially dangerous e
lements: knowledge of rejuvenating
features of young blood can cause ritual cannibalism. And that
raises jq and the question is "will those rituals be promoted
bymohels if artificial blood will be more juvene than those of the
babies?"
bymohels. and I dont correct it. It seems I began to encode my
information to make some additional filters, because politics
interests not only scientists.
I have an interesting azbuka (alphabet for kids) on my blackboard,
I will attach the picture later.
It shows words that look like the letters: А as Арбуз (a piece of
watermelon. Many words begin with А are not authentically russian
(арба, абажур, алфавит, азбука(?) арифметика, астрономия,,,
андатра? it's ондатра. О is 0? O is whole. B is two halves, ᚦ (D)
is one half - and that is how the story ends.
My fingers evn wrone "and this is how this
story begins" (and now it wanted to say "how it ends")
And it reminds me of the story of the moon.
M is O? W could be O becaues bothe are transliterated by ו
I probably became mad when I decided to kill myself. (I have whole
another book about this craze)
Other people become crazy when they think that li
kfe is good.
This other craze is as insane as the former one: a person crzy
that way thinks he knows shit when he don't: He may say пифагоровы
штаны во все стороны равны значит что от перемены мест слагаемых
сумма не изменяется. And be proud of himself. Though it's funny,
but that's not why he's proud.
Those two mentioned crazes can be cured by "No, because (because
you can make this world great)" and by "No, but (but you can make
this world greater) If you think it's great imagine how it can be
even greater than this, and notice that it is becaming greater
when we compare it to the past"
when instead of as, we instead of us, so whon by whon we
remove those wheeds of th
ose faggy
whords.
Is S for satan? змея кишечника, эндодерма. Фтв Ш аууд ше фы Ш
цкшеую
Я вчера обнаружил эхо от околокапсулы моей ванной из нержавейки на
расстоянии 15 см от неё и решил измериь длину одного колебания
моего голоаса (звучавшего между ы и э)
Скорость звука в воздухе 331.46 м/c (1193 км/ч)
частота 88 клавишного пианино:
88 (до7 (C8) 4186.01 Гц
88
клавиш в стандартном пианино. немецкое что-то.
1 (ля-1 (А0) 27.5000 Гц
длина волны = скорость волны к частоте волны
(у такой записи есть недостаток: не выделяется)
к - интересный лексический символ, способный
быть синонимом знака /
1 Гц = 1 с
−1
длина волны 88 = 0.079182802 м, т.е. около 8 сантиметров.
что логично, учитывая, что я пел не самым высоким тоном.
теперь найдём мой тон, несли длина волны была 15 сантиметров.
(измерение неточно)
тон = скорость волны к длине волны
331.46 к 0.15 = 2209.733333333(3)
клавиша 77 до♯6 (ре♭6)
C♯7/D♭7
и это же может быть расстоянием между связками и зубами.
(едва ли два эти эксперимента, произошедшие
с разницей в пару дней, не больше, являются несвязанными меж собой)
к - интересный лексический символ, способный быть синонимом знака
/
а теперь сравним с shorthand used by some englishman
![](III_files/62816-004-3D157E3F.jpg)
I found two of those. And none of them denotes
k as / which is only natural, because they didn't use it for
russian.
I already notice that they recognized / as ch,
j, r or as t, d, z, ch, j
ch & j is common in those systems. Which can testify of the
common predecessor, or it could be a coincidence of course, to see
what it is let's collect all the similarities:
They are very similar in that they collect letters in similar
groups:
KG (straight horizontals in pitman, curved horizontals in gregg)
MN (straight horizontals in gregg, curved horizontals in pitman)
both groups sorta open this chart, which reminds us of hindu and
meta-hindu scripts beginning with K, and MN as the followup group
reminds how it goes in the alphabet and that it challenges the
priority of K as labials tend to go before velars in the alphabet.
NG seem to be the closest to N in the both of shorthands.
PB are grouped in both shorthands, just as TD only Gregg invented
to make voiced ones longer (but in practice they could be pretty
much the same, ust as pitman doesn't care if it's pen or ben. ben
is longer.
S is its onw thing in both, only in gregg it could be grouped with
PB, as an even shorter P, strange.
And there are two ways to write S, two S's,
SS
SS σσ ςς σς ᛋᛋ is it why
they made up that ß?
wiki tells that they didn't, that it existed long before:
The ſs ligature used for Latin in 16th-century
Two THs, gregg treats them the same way he treated Ss, and that
makes S & TH invariants in gregg.
SH & H are somewhat similar in gregg which correlates with
what I said of H standing for SH
Gregg treats L as voiced form of R which is interesting.
Here I see that some forms of Pitman are indeed similar to
aboriginal syllabary of Canada.
But I argue that the structure is all different, so this
similarity could be accidental or rather directly used to explain
secondariness of the aboriginal writings to the european not even
alphabet but shorthand. As if it was some game for that
missionary. For otherwise he would directly apply one of existing
shorthands, or rather would use latin alphabet as in many other
cases it took place.
Vanga vangovala chto russia will save tha warld, Is it because we
came through commie holocoast and
we deserve reparations
and we can tell the world what «they» are about to do? Or is it
because "they" treated us as niggers though we were a white
nation. And now we see all thir hutzpa through?
The argument given in the end of the first volume still applies,
but I have to be edgy if I dare to be the representative of this
edgy group of sages and bum
ps.
Looking at this image,
![](img/087.png)
I ponder upon it:
Did jews pronounce it so vowellessly fast or obscure that arabs
misinterpreted those vowels even further and thus got ه thoroughly
consonant?
what follows doesn't directly related to
what I just said it's how my thought jumps, or the above part
was just added because I almost forgot to add it thought I was
going to but was distracted.
But I just took a bath (high as hell) and had a breakthrough or
two:
![](III_files/IMG-5497.JPG)
What I omitted from these papers is that heart seems to be related
to whore.
And it
correlates to dieuBla ~
bladieu (and even pu
tin ~ putain)
and now back to that azbuka I mentioned:
Letter Б resebles Барабан (drum & stick above it)
Letter B resembles double Вишня (cherry)
Letter Д resembles dolphin's fin. Why not Акула's fin? And А loes
look like Д a lot.
is it because dolphin shows some of its back and shark swims
deeper (for it's fish)
Е resembles Ель (fir) just as russian alphabet does:
А Б В Г Д
Е Ё Ж З
И Й К Л М Н
О П Р С Т
У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ
Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я
or even
А Б В Г Д
Е Ё Ж З
И Й К Л М Н
О П Р С Т
У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ
Ъ Ы Ь
Э
Ю
as if this part is the fir's root, then ЪЫЬ это грибы. твёрдый
белый и мяхкая сыроежка
Я
here you can see that of those 5 lines only йклмн breat the
convenient evenness of the consonants,
if we think of winding those consonants around the vowels,
and in that line we have Й and, as I mentioned before, Й & Ё
are diacrited И & Е. thus:
А Б В Г Д
Е Ж З
by the way, е ж з is how
they have it in bulgarian
И К Л М Н
О П Р С Т
У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ
but this way the firness is lost, or
rather less
Ъ Ы Ь
Э
Ю
Я
А
Б В
Г Д
Е Ж З
И
К Л
М Н
О П Р
С Т
У Ф Х
Ц Ч Ш Щ
Ъ Ы Ь
Э
Ю
Я
I have to admit it is the most weird axial symmetry
(if we didn't remove Й & Ё there'd be none
at all)
The one which can compete with it in strangeness is another
post-christian, armenian, on form of which arranges into axial,
but also has weird forms, I gave it in the first voluem, so I go
further. I return to arabic abjad, because if we rearrange it
according to its modern form, it too has the conjunction &(и,
و)
ا
ب ج
د ه
و ز ح
ی
ک ل م ن
س
ع ف
ص ق ر ش ت ث خ ذ ض ظ غ
I'm tired of trying arabic letters to behave and allow spacebars
on the left of it, so I give it to your imagination.
As you can see, if we shift the vowel position on on position, we
get an unarrangeable odd number of consonants in the residue.
And I didn't expect to see in that neck that very similar to И ی
so allow me to rearrange it into how I saw it with و (which is
similar to и not phonetically or graphically, but semantically) as
its neck:
ا
ب ج د ه
و
ز ح
ی ک ل
م ن س
ع ف ص ق
ر ش ت ث خ ذ ض ظ غ
But still 9 letters in the final line of the axis, thus modern
arabic alphabet isn't arranging into axials, and thus the ancient
one, more similar to jewish is truer. Also because it doesn't have
those lame necks.
I should have probably put what's above and
what's below in gray, but I told you it's mostly a draft.
But back to that azbukqa: Ё always looked to be as a hedgehog
sitting on his ass with his paws to the right, and .. of his eys
above his nose.
Ж always looked like Жук (bug) which relates it to ⵥ which relates
to directly similar ⵣ
З could be recognized in a double sector of of umbrella,
И is Игла (needle (with a thread maybe, for I is enough))
К эс Канфэта это краешек конфеты с закрученыым бантиком
Л эс э доька лимона?
М даснт лук лайк э бол. I lost them and I lost the interest for
something I know feel freaky, though this can be taken as a game,
for artist could have some revelations, or at least he definitely
took an attempt to fine similar words (look at Ракетка for Р(r))
Ф эс филин, всегда видедл эти два глаза в Ф, но скорей всего это
луна, богиня мать? да, планета связанная с рождением (понятие о
которой появилось задолго до того как поняли что такое Земля)
просто в силу того, что фея, что зевс сейчас вместо неё. Что она
сейчас стоит после У как В (тоже две половины, В это Ф из первого
ряда) т.е. одна из UVW (которые вроде тоже я узнал как три фазы
луны, и Y как четвёртая, новая, неведомая, невидимая, no, new,
just know, knew)
Ш как шишка, Щ как зубы и хвост. шишка интересно от слова шин или
другого корян?
Т does look like a flower, but not as tulip. Ц (цветок) looks more
like a tulip.
Ч похож на носик чайника, У похоже на утюг с большой долей
фантазии (потому что шнур с другой стороны утюга)
В отальном он такой задачи перед собой даже подсознательно судя по
всему не ставил, разве что Ю стандартно напоминает юлу
let's take a couple of steps back:
А Б В Г Д
Е Ё Ж З
И Й К Л М Н
О П Р С Т
У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ
Ъ Ы Ь
Э
Ю
Я
Here I noticed that russian row of vowels could reflect eachother:
Я is the most similar to А
ЭЮ could stand as a claster reflecting EЁ
Ы is the most similar to И
У is the most similar to O
Was it arranged this way because they recognized the similarity of
two final lines? For П ~ Ф
I doubt it was the reason. I dont know how it happened this way,
but Й reflects Ь or Ъ
But if Ы line reflects И line, then ЭЮЯ reflect LMN, and thus ЭЮЯ
are phases of the moon:
Э is turned exactly the way waxing moon is turned, Ю has O as full
moon, Я has that C of waning one.
(I don't feel like using the term crescent,
for it could be related to cross, and thus memed by christians)
they could recognize that similarity (or designed this symmetry)
because У used to be Оу or whatever.
So what I'm hypohesizing here is alphabet could be a lunar
calendar. and though it would have 52 letters, 26 letters are
exactly the half of the year.
But this guess requires hidden fourth in all the clasters. UVWY is
one? What is X&Z?
I thnk ths gss wll crmbl. Bt lts s/ snake sees? She doesn't speak
much that's for sure.
but say also comes with s yet it's sy
seer opens its maw. пасть ис боус маус энд фол. In this
transliteration mouse equals mouth
mouse mice eat
s,
and it
hey do
esn't
work. meows (мяус) is the same.
it = ith?
and if they its plural form, it's th, the. and it equals the
I am crazy because I eat lots of pastery which you write as
pastry, and it's hard for me to understand why a souds as ei and
Now I see that it's of paste. and the paste in copy/paste is of
putting a piece of paper on glue, on paste. paste is dough and it
pastes. We humans row yet in wrong direction, so we have to pull.
then we turn into a cancet cesl
I saw those cells they called cancer and they are like spindles.
Let me stretch my self like spindle and I pray I don't turn into a
crab.
I can stretch all of my body, and not just limbs with vacuum on
both ends of my body. and that vacuum will be what will bring
fresh air to the centre of it.
But before I make this experiment upon myself, I will make it on a
mouse in a lab, equipped with both equipment and specialists to
test its blood for cancer components and to procede long enough to
see how it feels and where it grows.
I wanted to say that we grow in our bellies, so we have to stretch
the body, for we grow in the weightlessness. WE HAVE TO LIVE
HORIZONTALLY, SO THE GRAVITY DOESN"T AFFECT OUR CELLS WITH THAT
MUCH OF THE WEIGHT. Horizontally and in liquid, please.
Say and See are the both Se as in french savoir.
here I notice that now this book s a collection of esays on all
sorts of (mostly linguistic) topics
and that word essays on some sheet are so sodomite as those words,
that I look at that plato school, ew
ШI spoke of
Mitra before, now I ask what if Marduk is the same as Meredith?
More death? Mare's death? or Mothers' son? Marhy's duke? I mix all the unmixable
languages driven by the belief of their previous proximity. And
though I don't believe in the big bang therory, I suppose
languages spread from similar several concepts. I could be wrong
though, that is also why I use ?'s instead of.'s so much here.
(not that it was any way important, but I
just hwanted to utilize a piece of paper with this text, and I
didn't felt like letting this though go without trace)
Пережуём переживём (про проклятия) и представил как вращением
пережёвываю сущносии внутри меня, сворачивая бошки ли, растирая
ли, Что, проснулся сатана? уээлком.
и подпрыгнул больно приземлившись на ноги. ноги заныли. ноги -то
тут причём, ноги это сатана? они снизу.
нет, ноги это мезодермо. мясо-дерма моё
derma could be of the same period as sheet, assenize? associate?
eassay I wanted to say and now I see here easy. Could it be of
that period when S became recognized as [s\ and not [k\
?
I'm asking of C. I'm high and I forgot sometihng important...
Ah, yearh, мясо ~ meso. how could ancient people know of those
embryonic layers? They could recognize it as шкура и кишки, а то
что между и есть мясо. ньясо? как оно по японски? niku 肉 and also
as ma in まめ 肉刺 (though jisho tells it's collonialism, so could be
me neo-kun-yomi.)
Could it be that chinese stole al.. hieroglyphs from japanese?
Because japanese are visually, obviously more civilized, and their
language is more complex than chinese. I only think chinese is
perfect for being the most ancient language, because they keep all
the hieroglyphs monosyllable. But those syllables are more o more
complex than japanese kana, whi chs (which is) also monosyllable.
But that breaks another dogma, that kana is simplified hieroglyph
and not the other way around, that not hieroglyphs are collected
from simpler pieces, which they are.
That allows me to compare graphic forms of kana and philippinian
writing systems. Because now I suspect they're the most ancient
part of that writing system. But was egyptian alphabet a
simplified form of some previously used as merely an hieroglyphic
semantic signs. (I forgot the term, too busy to look for it. busy,
not lazy, wow, I reprogram my mind as I speak)
So the ancient people tore skinn and insideskins away, thus they
removed both ekto & ento. both words are known in common
language: ento as into, and ekto as? ex? outside can be outo?
outro? intro is nutro? (russian нутро)
in ~ nu? N? it explains why no when as aprefix (a prefix, apre?)
apre is opening in italian, but I expected something else. apreori
aposteriori what is apre really? ape are pbefore humans, but
hardly it is related. arse is ass though. were apes always
recognized a predecessors?
Japanese ニ(に) [ni] and ミ(み) [mi] standing for 2 (二) & 3 (三)
consequently kinda supports my bold hypothesis that chinese
weiring originates in Japan. Because they teach that only mi is
originally japanese (for chinese form is san) but ni is a chinese
form (for japanese form is futa) but now I just doubt it.
(okay, Composer cannot catch up again and
lags, so I think it's time to begin volume IV)