Writing direction: left to right or right to left in horizontal lines, or boustropehedon (alternating from left-to-right and right-to-left)
Used to write: Raga, apma, Bislama and English
The letters all join together and words can be written with a single continuous stroke.
Here we have a rare insight into how writing systems may come into being:
Here's their (completely made up) alphabet:

It is not clear how many of other writings systems they knew (they said they did, did they?)
Because I can see ש in their Sa and פ in their Pa.
And I see o and ɔ in their o, and I see u (и(и)RU[i]) in their i.
So would it be enough for me to speculate about it? What made them write them like that? Did that man they met in the cafe taught them some hebrew, when he initiated them to the idea of making their own writing system? Should I contact them for more information? I probably will.. but not today.


I just o.. noticed, that I tend to curse where I lie: I do it in my own fucking little fucking way.
It's just one case study, not very scientific, so we have to find more cases where I curse to see if this pattern persists. My way is not little. O r is it leittle and I don't want to admit it.







Танит (финик. 𐤕𐤍𐤉𐤕‎; Таннита) — богиня-девственница, особенно почитавшаяся в Карфагене наряду с Баал-Хаммоном[1][2].
Танит также называли Тиннит или Танк. Название Тиннит, судя по всему, появилось в Карфагене, хотя им и не называли местных детей[3]. Являлась аналогом богини Луны Астарты, а в римском Карфагене ей поклонялись в качестве Юноны Келестис — локализованной формы римской богини Юноны[4].

Tanit or Tinnit (Punic: 𐤕𐤍𐤕 Tīnnīt[2]) was a Carthaginian Punic goddess, and the chief deity of Ancient Carthage, alongside her consort Baal Hammon.[3][4]
The name appears to have originated in Carthage (modern day Tunisia), though it does not appear in local theophorous names.[5] She was equivalent to the war goddess Astarte, and later worshipped in Roman Carthage in her Romanized form as Dea Caelestis, Juno Caelestis, or simply Caelestis. Before 1955, the only attestations of the goddess's name were in Phoenician, which is written without vowels. It was arbitrarily vocalized as "Tanit". In 1955, Punic inscriptions transliterated in Greek characters found at El-Hofra (near Constantine, Algeria) transliterated the name as Greek: Θινιθ (Thinith) and Greek: Θεννειθ (Thenneith). The inscriptions indicate that the name was likely pronounced as Tinnīt.[2] Still, many scholars and writings continue to use Tanit.
In modern-day Tunisian Arabic, it is customary to invoke Omek Tannou or Oumouk Tangou ('Mother Tannou' or 'Mother Tangou', depending on the region), in years of drought to bring rain.[6] Similarly, Algerian, Tunisian and many other spoken forms of Arabic refer to "Baali farming" to refer to non-irrigated agriculture.[7] Such usage is attested in Hebrew, a Canaanite language sister to Phoenician, already in the 2nd century CE Mishnah.[8]

The word Tunisia is derived from Tunis; a central urban hub and the capital of modern-day Tunisia. The present form of the name, with its Latinate suffix -ia, evolved from French Tunisie,[28][29] in turn generally associated with the Berber root ⵜⵏⵙ, transcribed tns, which means "to lay down" or "encampment".[30] It is sometimes also associated with the Carthage goddess Tanith (or Tunit),[28][31] and the ancient city of Tynes.[32][33]

Baal Hammon, properly Baʿal Ḥamon (Phoenician and Punic: 𐤁𐤏𐤋 𐤇𐤌𐤍, romanized: Baʿl Ḥamōn),[1] meaning "Lord Hammon", was the chief god of Carthage. He was a weather god considered responsible for the fertility of vegetation and esteemed as King of the Gods. He was depicted as a bearded older man with curling ram's horns.[2] Baʿal Ḥammon's female cult partner was Tanit.[3]

Pay attention to how much russian word Бог looks like 𐤁𐤏𐤋, Baal in phoenician



A good illustration to e being dotted i:



Basal ~ basalt.



лепо ~ любо



An interesting glyph, being in between Б and В:




In National Museum of Hakassia were some writings found:


I wrote to the museum for the images in better quality and asked them if they know some linguists who researched it, I shall update this chapter if they send me something.

On the basis of geography I appl.ly old-turkic runes to reading it, and that П-like form can be only 𐰊 (and it is b and v! (in this context, wow)) and I see П in it. What would that П stand fore?
In hebrew pe is mouth, in russian pay (пей) is drink. 𐰊 looks like it could be a depiction of mouth (an opening at the front bottom side of the head? But they write the other way around. But then who said they use the faraonic way to turn face to the beginning of the line? b obviously tells that 𓃀 can be the other way around. And geographically they are 50% chance moved via Europe. Or rather in 50% of all information coming from the Egypt would come through Europe. But then there's ocean or a sea between Europe and Egypt. They crossed that sea alright. But nevertheless, it was some tradition they had to acquire before they dared to establish cross-continent travel.
𐰊 (b¹) A letter of the Old Turkic runic (Yenisei Kyrgyz) script, representing /b/ and /v/, used with back vowels.
Derived from Sogdian 𐼃 (β, “beth”), ultimately from Classical Syriac ܒ (“beth”).
so beth, not peh, 𐰊, избушка к лесу передом, к тебе задом (вход со двора (выход во двор, а не на твой участок))
If they're from Syriac, they're closer to egyptian.



Avestan:

I brought it here to show you that they had quaternal numeral system.


here's an image from vol.1,

and what it shows is that boustrophedon was known even in those prehistoric times of Linear A
and so is the shape of the pawn, which may indicate existence of some primitive lathes, which is not a crazy thing to consider, considering the fact of how simple that technology is, that Адвокат Егоров manages to build them living in the woods, and that potter's wheel is basically it. And other terms for potter's wheel may also indicate this technology being rather basic: throw, throwing, wheel, and jigger is somewhat less impressive, but it doesn't negate the others. And I think it's time for me to be a potter too. and I do.



That right is rule makes left slaved (оставленные, брошенные набигаторы попадали в рабы (строили что разрушили и работали за тех кого убили))

I felt left~sleft before I thought of right and reign (rein is another spelling with somewhat different

I didn't feel left as felt, but it seems I should have. feeling remains.

We leave what we feel, we left what we felt

lef and fel the probably doublet reverses.

лев is feline. кот is ток. does it make sense that cats are in the centre of this story? Cult of cats.

cat take

It seems there's a claster of lexics, which we can cross-link on phonetico-semantic basis.

in pronouns it usually reverses meaning. Or they just speak like that? spoke like that.
we and you?
вы и я?

russians say we, saying you(вы) communism settled there because they wanted other to do their biddings, but then they said ya, but it was not you, but I. it's as if they say we. The pronoun which sounds the most as me is мы and it is we. Both russian and englsih use mi, but russian includes the people in the room, english me excluded them. And it may whether depict the state of events or programs it. Either way, it is such a wild problem, that I should be doing something else. I know how to live forever, but smoke pot and write this shit instead. Is it honey, no hey (I wansted to say honey, but wrote no, ad as if automatic writing kicked in.


Put me in the pot and make me pot. top

pot is top.. I should collect such cases. and I do it in the Lukashevich chapter of freaks.html

pot uis top

is~with? съ (ъ works as immediate russian tamga, and it is incredible that that Гd, or rather dГ reversed is Guard ~ Hard ~ Хозяит ~ Host (now this host thing was not expected (came to me after I wrote Хозяит and it was a typo. Х[h] X[t] X[z] (HTN хотенье? 欲しい)
that 欲 is ho, the word is hoshii, хочу[hochu(wanna)]

Those h t z from few lines above are from h of the host and hozain, t is of hosT and that typeo хозяит, and n of хозяин. back and forth reading of words may indicate synonymgenous gameplays of boustrophedon texts.

Х is H in russian, Н is N in russian, so basically this is how I pulled h~n from above (ang graphically these two play along well)
𐩩 is ancient south arabian T, and thise is how HTN triplet was made, and z became instead of N by accident or for some unmentioned reasons, some vaguely appearing reasons of that thing.

is N 𐩩-like anywhere? it is in runes: ᚾ

And seeing this table in wiki, I can only tell, right on,

That what they call Younger Futhark is Norse Futhark, the tradition are separated by geography much more than by chronology.

And according to that table,
ᚾ is more common than ᚿ
but amongst ᛅ and ᛆ wins ..ᛡ

and bornholm's thing tells that when ᚾ is ᚿ, then ᚼ is not ᛆ, but ᚷ[h]



Is it why H is at the end of line, as if it was some T, because both are ᚷRU[h] (that RU was supposed to stand for runes, but now it looks like russian, and in russian Х is H too) and 𐰓TU[t]
In my book I plased d' as transliteration of 𐰓 so who knows how based it is.

So does it tell that E-line is runic?
and U-line is old-turkic, and it is the first line in it. Is ᚷ in the first aet? probably, it seems to be a form of ᚴ, but it more often than not is placed in the beginning of the second aet. In so called Younger futhark it is so, in older futahrkhw, it is in the first aet.

And it goes like this:
ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚲᚷᚹ    (ᚻ/ᚺ)ᚾᛁᛃᛇᛈᛉᛊ    ᛏᛒᛖᛗᛚ(ᛜ/ᛝ)ᛞᛟ
and it makes me understand that the order of aettir is not urth beldandi skuld, but urth skurd beldandi (but I still have to pull it, and a lot, even though it's fascinating that ᚢᚦᚨᚱ of ᚢᚱᚦ is in the first one, but should it make others verdandi and skuld? All I need is three runes from each other aet, and ᛒᛚᛏ or ᛒᛚᛞ would make lice nice (nice ~ like?) beldandi (bld is blood and блядь, both are different yet powerful words) and thus I'm only left to tailor trigraph of skuld from aet two, but only ᛊ comes handy, others sabotage.



Remember those patterns built out of final digits of the Pascal triangle in different numeral systems?
Here's a work I found today, and in wiki it was, all I had to do is to ctrlF Pascal in the article for Sierpinski triangle. And it began mentioning it in 2002: A Sierpinski triangle can also be constructed by starting with Pascal's triangle and coloring the even numbers white, the odd numbers black.
and link to those guys appeared there in 29 March 2015, and I don't think it is in the article of Pascal triangle even now, in 2024, it isn't.

and as I started wondering if they were influenced by me posting that invention not later than 2002 and they published in 2004, I saw in their references link to this:

It is from an article of Stephen Wolfram, from 1984 (mirror)
and because I knew his both name and face before, I wrote to the guy, and I should manage my antisemitism (whether he answers or not; either way, I already recognize the disdain as a psychosis. Yes, the world is full of jews, yes they're some separate entity, yes deal with it or rather get over it. And especially if he answers, that will prove that they're not as ethnocentric as I imagine them to be. That Mathloger jew could ignore my email not because he saw a goy in me, but because he knew of my "discovery" decades before I shared it with him)


Is french not reading all the endings which keep on piling up (would be clearer if we still wrote from the bottom up. Why would they take this tradition if they borrowed latin or greek?


But lets' dig onto those maths, they fascinate me by how everything comes to one, the dots they use are hexagons which are projection of rhombic dodecahedron, and the idea is so simple, that even a non-mathematician could come to it as long as he new some numeral system, which was like from such ancient past, that we can only guess, and we have written artefacts with mathematical texts (some summation) from 50 ooo years ago or something.

The smallest element of the classic sierpinski triangle is a triangle with side of two.




This pattern is so much trinary, that I cannot help but think how if it was known in the antiquity, and it could be, no heavy math is needed to discover it. So if it was known, it could be the root of the story of three norns around the tree of life.



And this tiniest structural scheme is pythagorean tetractis without the central five, which reminds the hidden sphira.
Could serpinski triangle be the original tree of life? Tetractis has ten sephirot too.



And here you can see mod-5 sierpinski triangle, which repeats such patterns.
And mod-5 pattern has to be doubled, to show what exactly repeats:

And Sierpinski triangle indeed was known in the past:
Wacław Sierpiński described the Sierpiński triangle in 1915. However, similar patterns appear already as a common motif of 13th-century Cosmatesque inlay stonework.[19]











as you can see here, mostly they're the same size of the triangle, which may tell of nine muses, divided into three groups or three muses from the earlier lore. And muses are moirae they are, the norns, the same three muses, and probably other trinary deities.

and there they give another piece of data on even more antique similar forms:
The Apollonian gasket was first described by Apollonius of Perga (3rd century BC) and further analyzed by Gottfried Leibniz (17th century), and is a curved precursor of the 20th-century Sierpiński triangle.[20]

and though 3BC is not that ancient in the context of the source of the belief of Moirae, those are only echoes of the past. The first discoveries of this sierpinski's thing are just not heard, and not because they were not heard.

and looking into this abyss a little more, I found what they call the triangles of the prime numbers, pascal triangles, they're pascal triangles too. And it seems Wolfram researched this thing through and long ago:


and it allowed me to see that mod-3 and even mod-2 are both Pascal triangles, it wasn't simple to see it especially for the mod-2 pascal triangle, the Sierpinski triangle.




A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
az (Iold-RU?)
by (by? be?)
cx (sex? cakes? socks? cocks?)
dw (do? dew?)
ev (eve? её?)
fu (boo? fuck you? buck you was the previous version, thus it's closer to еbutt)
gt (get?)
hs (has)
ir (or? 𓁹?)
jq (jack? jerk? jock?)
kp (cap? cop? cub? keep?)
lo (low? law? lo?)
mn (man)

was it b to y?
by sed do eve fuck you get (hers?) eye jack, keep low, amn man (and that's a nice typo: amn is amen, and man is a palindrome of amn, which is near ams and amt.
buy sex, do eve fuck you good(gut) his ire jaque and though keep low man is nice advice, it is all just an interpretation, and my word is not much better than anybody else's.

as
by
cakes
do
ev (её, их)
f. u.

isn't us plural form of dutch U? it would make perfect sense.

we ~ U (we asp lural U too, only now with more eastern suffix (and to my surprise, the third form, our, has r as the plural suffix, and it is the norsk way to do it: aet(Sg) aettir(Pl)))


кровь дракона может быть от крови крокодила до сока расстения, считавшегося драконом? (подумал про сок или даже отвар расстения поглядев на люголь столь походую на чягермейстер и обе столь похожие на тёмную кровь. мог быть рыцарь победителем дракона (не только мечом - фолрма серпа же - но и огнём, как в сказках) дракон дерётся? дракон дерёт кожу когда через него пролезаешь? колючка? сказщки для детей. Для детей драконы поменьше, колючий куст чем не дракон.


boosty as the opposite of пусти (спусти, отпусти)
b is up, p is down? папа daddy? baba qaqa? oKAsan, haha

papa&dada / baba&qaqa (мама кака? отец мыть ребёнка не будет, мыть от мать (подобно тому как быть и будь, выть и вой, ныть и ной, мыть и мой, брать и бери, красть и кради, класть и клади. класть и красть как противоположны! L ласково, R грубо, is R associated with Right today, because might is right?! (кто смел тот и съел (might не только мощь, но и мог, кто мог ~ кто смел(кто смёл? )))))
дь~ой? дядя ~ ойой? бабай? страншый? старший~страшный (дети нестрашны)
дя ~ ть? когда за ухо хватает?















These I and V I met today.

I is Iodine, that's clear, but what is V? Viride nitens

And these are so much basic (base is ba ce, before a appeared (was placed there) (when bible started with в начале, а не а в начаалеб when ogham began as bln, and that bln~bcd)) 

I V are 1 and 5 or 4 of roman numerals, and etruscan V was ᚢ

and it happens that a) it is mostly russian thing, b) it was invented recently:
In Russia and Ukraine (and much of the rest of the former Soviet Union), the dilute alcoholic solution of brilliant green is sold as a topical antiseptic, also known under a Latin name solutio viridis nitentis spirituosa and the colloquial Russian name of zelyonka (зелёнка, lit. 'green stuff' in Russian),[3][failed verification] which is zelenka (зеленка) in Ukrainian.
Бриллиантовый зелёный впервые был получен в 1879 году в Германии. Об антисептических свойствах этого вещества узнали только в следующем столетии, когда при окрашивании препаратов для микроскопии обнаружилось, что один из красителей — а именно бриллиантовый зелёный — уничтожает микробы.
В середине XX века бриллиантовая зелень, долговечная и дешёвая в производстве, получила широкое распространение в Советском Союзе[6][7].
В русский язык название этого красителя попало из французского языка. В сухом виде бриллиантовый зелёный представляет собой золотисто-зелёные комочки, по лат. viridis nitens, — дословно «зелёный блестящий». Во французском языке было использовано слово фр. brillant — «блестящий», что на русский было переведено буквально как «бриллиантовый»[8][9].
Кроме России и нескольких стран на постсоветском пространстве, бриллиантовый зелёный в медицине нигде больше не используют, хотя, например, в Европе он входит в список разрешённых медицинских препаратов[10]. Можно назвать следующие причины этого: во-первых, до сих пор точно неизвестно, обладает ли бриллиантовый зелёный канцерогенными свойствами; а во-вторых, при использовании лекарственного средства важна и эстетическая сторона, отчего принимаются во внимание и изменения во внешнем виде пациента при применении препарата[9].
But on the deeper level, those I and V are from Io
Iodine is a chemical element; it has symbol I and atomic number 53. The heaviest of the stable halogens, it exists at standard conditions as a semi-lustrous, non-metallic solid that melts to form a deep violet liquid at 114 °C (237 °F), and boils to a violet gas at 184 °C (363 °F). The element was discovered by the French chemist Bernard Courtois in 1811 and was named two years later by Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac, after the Ancient Greek Ιώδης, meaning 'violet'.

Iodhs is violet
Viridis is green
and these may indicate, that vowels were for collouirs, but red in latin is R, sometimes p and b (rubrum is almost redrum)


Let this messy route of the previous chapter stay here to see, that I look everywhere I can, and I also keep it here as a shell of this beauty:


That beauty indicates that runes were taken from people like etruscans,
And etruscans were conquered around the same time Tacitus wrote Germania, telling that germans divinate with runes.
Etruscan culture is dated from 900BC to 27BC:
• Villanovan culture                                              900 BC[1]
• Last Etruscan cities formally absorbed by Rome    27 BC[1]
The Villanovan culture (c. 900–700 BC), regarded as the earliest phase of the Etruscan civilization,[1][2][3][4][5] was the earliest Iron Age culture of Italy.
and I was looking their artefacts to see if they were literate, and some symbols they did know:

And before I even saw all the swastikas, I noticed that concentric circles which I saw in atztek culture.. and atzteks also knew swastikas.
The Swastika is an ancient Indo-European (Aryan) symbol representing luck and prosperity.
Before Hitler's adoption of the symbol made it politically incorrect to use the symbol here in the West, it was found throughout Eurasian cultures as well as Aztec culture.

In short, This symbol was used by the Aztecs to represent the 4 seasons & the 4 ultimate/eternal elements/energies(fire, earth, water & air)
but this is just from a comment of a guy on quora, his word is not better than mine, but the swastikas aztecs knew.
And looking at that shield I can see those concentric circles to be tits, and those tits to be covered fixing of the handle on the other side, it would be something firm as metal to withdraw the battle.

Jewish swastica, can you believe it!
Chinese swastica incorporates christian cross in it.
But then there's also such comment about the Aztec swastica:
There's no "Aztec" swastika like that.
There's a sorta similar arrangement of serpents in a codex, but it's not the same thing.
These four biests do look like four seasons or four elements, but then we should see them in some contexts which would be telling so.
What is also interesting here is that each beast has exactly ten circles, even though only two of four have those circles concentric doubles of which I was speaking telling of those shield.

And here's the counterargument:
In the Americas, it was In Native American cultures it has been found in Mississippian Culture (mound building) sites 800 CE to 1600 CE . Also on objects from the Southeastern Ceremonial Complex (1200 to 1650). It was used by many unrelated peoples in the American Southwest. By people in the Northern Plains in the US and Canada. By the Kuna people of Panama. It is also found in Peru.

For the Navajo (Dine), it is part of a ceremonial ritual and accompanying myth and is called tsil no'oli (whirling logs). A culture hero escapes down a river on logs and is spun in a whirlpool. Before the hero is released, Frog teaches Self Teacher how to cure the illnesses caused by the Water People. When Self Teacher's whirling log finally arrives at the lake (or in some versions, a whirlpool) that was his destination, Talking God, Hastye Hogan, and two Biighaa'ask'idii rescue him. Often his pet turkey is in the image too. It is a symbol of healing or abundance. As with many other cross symbols in Navajo thought there is also the relationship to the important theme of four directions, four sacred mountains, etc. Here is from the Nightway ceremony.

These are Navajo Hataałii (sometimes called “medicine men, they are ritual ceremonial leaders and philosophers, like priests). They are making a sand painting using the whirling logs image.

Before this I only saw it in tibetian monks, but then we should see in literature who taught whom. And if it's not in the literature (the process of the education one way or the other) then those traditions are ancient, prehistoric. And then

For the Hopi the symbol is related to the migration and gathering of the clans at the Hopi mesas.

For the Kuna it is the World Octopus that created the world and points in the Four Directions.

Here is a Pima ( Akimel O'odham) basket using the symbol.



Eve חַוָּה‎ Εὕα
It has been suggested that the Hebrew name Eve (חַוָּה) also bears resemblance[9] to an Aramaic word for "snake"


Old Persian:
  𐎭 [d]     𐎨[c]
𐎢 [u]    𐎥[g]
              𐎤 [ku]    𐎰[θ]
and in the process I felt like these are not phonetically motivated forms, but forms from the previous writing system, like meroitic is of egyptian.


a   k    x   g   c   ç   j   t   θ  d  p 
𐎠 𐎣 𐎧 𐎥 𐎨 𐏂 𐎩 𐎫 𐎰 𐎭 𐎱 𐎳 𐎲 𐎴 𐎶 𐎹 𐎺 𐎼 𐎾 𐎿 𐏀 𐏁 𐏃 𐎡 𐎪 𐎮 𐎷 𐎻 𐎢 𐎤 𐎦 𐎬 𐎯 𐎵 𐎸 𐎽
𐎠a   𐎡i   𐎢 u  𐎣k  𐎤ku   𐎥g   𐎦gu    𐎧x   𐎨c   𐎩j   𐎪ji    𐎫t    𐎬tu   𐎭d    𐎮di   𐎯du   𐎰θ   𐎱p    𐎲b   𐎳f   𐎴n   𐎵nu  𐎶m  𐎷mi  𐎸mu  𐎹y  𐎺v  𐎻vi  𐎼r  𐎽ru  𐎾l  𐎿s  𐏀z  𐏁š  𐏂ç  𐏃h

𐎓 is ugaritic ʿ(this is literally the transcriptionof ayin) the ɔ (and notice how european moon is growing, waning waxing, when ugaritic and semeitic ayin is waxing waning. They are being held accountable, 4
Didn't I know these two words? good thing is I didn't use them in my book (or if I did, I would)

𐎀a 𐎁b 𐎂c 𐎃ḫ 𐎄d
𐎅h(e) 𐎆w 𐎇z 𐎈ḥ 𐎉θ
𐎊и 𐎋k 𐎌 š 𐎍l 𐎎m 𐎏 ḏ 𐎐(𐎃 rotated 90°)n 𐎑 ẓ 𐎒s
𐎓ʿ(ɔ) 𐎔п 𐎕ṣ 𐎖q 𐎗r 𐎘ṯ 𐎙ġ 𐎚t 𐎛ỉ 𐎜 ủ 𐎝s̀  𐎟

𐎂c 𐎃ḫ
    𐎇z are г з ж: г as one wedge, z as two wedges, ж as three wedges.
                                                   z also looks like 2
Now we should only find the language which раз два три сам are some газ заж жигл
but if I didn't know russian, I wouldn't know раз Rah's, only один Odin.




Youtube algoritms decided to initiate me into gnostic stuff:
ΙΑΩ is the name for both Yahweh and Dionysus
Several ancient sources record an apparently widespread belief in the classical world that the god worshiped by the Jewish people, Yahweh, was identifiable as Dionysus or Liber via his identification with Sabazios. Tacitus, Lydus, Cornelius Labeo, and Plutarch all either made this association, or discussed it as an extant belief (though some, like Tacitus, specifically brought it up in order to reject it). According to Plutarch, one of the reasons for the identification is that Jews were reported to hail their god with the words "Euoe" and "Sabi", a cry typically associated with the worship of Sabazius. According to scholar Sean M. McDonough, it is possible that Plutarch's sources had confused the cry of "Iao Sabaoth" (typically used by Greek speakers in reference to Yahweh) with the Sabazian cry of "Euoe Saboe", originating the confusion and conflation of the two deities. The cry of "Sabi" could also have been conflated with the Jewish term "sabbath", adding to the evidence the ancients saw that Yahweh and Dionysus/Sabazius were the same deity. Further bolstering this connection would have been coins used by the Maccabees that included imagery linked to the worship of Dionysus such as grapes, vine leaves, and cups. However the belief that the Jewish god was identical with Dionysus/Sabazius was widespread enough that a coin dated to 55 BC depicting a kneeling king was labelled "Bacchus Judaeus" (BACCHIVS IVDAEVS), and in 139 BC praetor Cornelius Scipio Hispalus deported Jewish people for attempting to "infect the Roman customs with the cult of Jupiter Sabazius".

shouldn't I ignore all this? because it is interesting, but how does it relate to my own research?

ΙΑΩ is descending triad, and that is why I brought it here,



Here are two gods with very similar names, but of course I can only guess if that is not a coincidence:

Attis (/ˈætɪs/; Greek: Ἄττις, also Ἄτυς, Ἄττυς, Ἄττης)[2] was the consort of Cybele, in Phrygian and Greek mythology.[a]

Hades (/ˈheɪdiːz/; Greek: ᾍδης, translit. Hā́idēs, Attic Greek: [háːi̯dεːs], later [háːdεːs]), in the ancient Greek religion and mythology, is the god of the dead and the king of the underworld, with which his name became synonymous.[2] Hades was the eldest son of Cronus and Rhea, although this also made him the last son to be regurgitated by his father.[3] He and his brothers, Zeus and Poseidon, defeated their father's generation of gods, the Titans,[4] and claimed joint rulership over the cosmos. Hades received the underworld, Zeus the sky, and Poseidon the sea, with the solid earth (long the province of Gaia) available to all three concurrently. In artistic depictions, Hades is typically portrayed holding a bident[5] and wearing his helm with Cerberus, the three-headed guard-dog of the underworld, standing at his side.

gnostics are gnasty

According to Ammon Hillman, Ιαω means "to heal", which correlates with the story about vowels pronounced in succession were healing.

He can be right or wrong, but he surely raised the interest to study greek to see those other meanings by myself in the context of understood text to see if any or both translation is valid. Sacred texts could have multiple meanings, that would make them special.

Maybe the same way multiple maenings can exist in the alphabet:

Abe
G-D  (the invisible face in the centre? from C to D the moon goes through the new moon. New moon in the centre. The baby, the one you cannot see.
Eve
?? gh? zh? hθ?
ΘΙ фей
LMN (element (samekh is s? eLeMeNtS?))
опрст? опрсту? ѹпрощю? опрости? прости? прст?
б-г
G-θ
ilmno элементарно elemen-no ilmn-o
прст прости

imln? imnl?

это очень слабое прочтение, если оно о чём-то говорит, так это что ..что вторая строка смущает, непонятна. но Eve же.. а остальное? θεά, Gea (Γαία) ζωή

ах боже dea
еva (eu fea) жиза
и мы alone (элементарно)
о прости

Я гадаю? Я угадываю.

б-г and g-d in the beginning and prays~praise~прошу~прости make abc a prayer.
aFR is toEN, so abc is to бог (they say that old bible is without spaces)

a б-г,
ёж зийк леон? nice guessing but M is lost. ёж зи йк лм мн
all these are poetry, and I asked not to send me poetry, yet I want to write songs, yet I don't know how, so am I to be a musician, if music is not what's t ot play in my mind?

I shouldn't also listen no other scholars, especially when they're openly satanists. He is a catholic priest, surely he could be an angent to poison the well for atheists and such.

б-г, devs (and ev do follow d, so is s z? a б-г devz (да us?) a bog? hey боже?

abe g-d evz?
и коли мы на от он покой рцы .. опору sit?
гада́ю угада́ю
гада́л угада́л
prefix у seems to pull the time of the virb one position forward.
past to the present and present to the future.
suffix l seems to push the time of the virb one position backward.
And it is interesting, that у is U the V, and l is л the Λ
past is above, for texts are written from to top to bottom.
(if it would be the other way around, wouldn't I say that runes wrote from bottom up? But it is not the case, the texts of modern kind are top to bottom)

ab б-г g-d de ev vz zi im mn nl lo op pq qr rs st tv? ends in tu? quelle raise set tu? when all you have is a screwdriver, everything looks like a screw.

It is not serious, to guess across the languages, start as greek in english and russian, to go hebrew, to end latin way, so is it why I cannot see it? бог и god в начале c прости или praise tu tells that it's both russian and english, that it's cross-language.

I would ask that antichrist about what he can read in the alphabets in greek, but then why would I care.
So I only ask my Muse.

Mem and Samekh could be Muse.
Hans would say Mother, father above mother, is child in between?

BD батя (bad (bust? бэд))
MS мася (good (путь? музы (and there was music.. and wonderful roses))))

if it was that primitive, there were no in between of firm male and softer female labial and lingual.

маня-маманя? because if ᛒᚦ is one pair, some ᛘᚿ or rather ᛘᚴ (for better graphic duality) should be the other pair. Or ᛘᛚ? моль is moth, so who knows if there's a link between moth and mother.
moth is мяхка, хрупка, а мама мяхче, дороже?




叫 [cháo] (call) sounds in such a way, that it's hard form me not to suspect it being Ч(ча) and О written right to left (they write in columns from right to left, so why would they not write characters from right to left in the past? How would I know if they did or didn't?




В D
 F Г
M L(Λ)
П Т

and that Г(r?) L thing made me see that T is the final letter. 𐌚 is F, S and Г are both C
(and that is why ᚦ reminds D much more than Г, and ᚦ is half ᛒ (as ᚴ is half ᛓ!)




В D
 F 𐤂
M Λ
П Т

by egyptian tradition, it is fair to say that 𐤂 [Г (r?)] looks to the right and Λ[L] looks to the left.
(by egyptian tradition of hieroglyphs looking at the beginning of their lines, you know me)


armor is armour
and color is colour
but or is not our


spend ~ spanned?


occult is hidden as in fecal occult blood



Devanagari is incredible:

अआइईउऊऋॠऌॡएऐओऔअंअः कखगघङहचछजझञयशटठडढणरषतथधनलसपफबभमव ०१२३४५६७८९
अआइईउऊऋॠऌॡ{एऐ}{ओऔ}अं अः (these two are not in groups, so they're diacritics)
in that the line of vowels is mostly redistributed to the consonantal colours

What an interesting glyph: ॐ॒॑॓॔ॕॖॗ

अं and अः are merely diacritized glyphs, yet they're in the list
are ईऐओऔ not diacritized? yet these are given their own glyphs even.
so hindu philology is a mess, but then I only stepped into the field, I am yet to figure out what is what.
but then they're not changing the nature of the vowel, only prolongate it, such prolongations are ॠ to ऋ and ॡ to ऌ

अं is postfix m  (am)
अः is postfix h  (ah)

labial before lingual otherwise

and there are also ॲ / ऍ (ê [æ])   and   ऑ (ô [ɒ])

It's hard for me to study this field, because whenever I read about it, I read it in hindu accent.
(and their philology does sound all messed up, mostly because of the terminology: aghoṣa is just voiceless, so why wouldn't they call it that? don't they know english to properly translate their terminology? so it doesn't help, but then maybe they wanted us to learn their language? a- is -less, like of which english also has, so ghoṣa should be voiced? but it's saghoṣa, and if sa is with, then russians have a symilar prefix, and then з in звонкие could be that very prefix, then вон would be phone. but russian is dirty in that вонь is stench.

so to wrap it for now, here are some tidbits from wiki:



 ᛒ  Δ
 F  Г
M Λ
 П  Т
 𐌚  𐌔

thinking of Г and L from the previous of such seances being гight and left, I cannot help but go
B Dexter
𐌚 𐌔inister
but 𐌔 goes before 𐌚 in the alphabet


поколение по колено (ped being both leg and kid)


But then there are other writing systems from the region, and some of them are way more systemic:

here's Lampung (some ancient "brahmic" writing system being in use before the muzzos came)



notice how m is double п,
how г and п oppose eachother with its voice-voiceless pairs are being its diacritized form (so that the diacritics stands for neither voice nor for voicelessness, but for the ..invariants, as I used to say)
and then I can see that m is not double п, but it's another invariant of it, so that p is the basis of b and m.
k and s are invarians of g, which is very similar to european C which used to be G, and now is k or s

n is double г!

their t reminds our t, and isn't ng gt? or rather is it tg? because it's right-to-left one, and it makes more sense this way.

But other than being abugida, what is brahmic about it? I guess they grouped them by geographic reasons obeying the preconceptions of whatever. Here's brahmic, and it has nothing in common:
but then some shapes are very similar:
And though they seem reflected, it's no wonder: brahmi goes left-to-right

Brahmi is way more mutated: gha being a double or otherwise modified pa doesn't make sense.
sa reminds ma now, being a modified pa, so it's all so much messed up, so I would study Lampung before going into any other brahmic writing system.


But then trying to make sense of Lampung only brought me this far so far:



יוֹדֵעַ [iodéa] is literally knowing or know or something along those lines. interesting, huh?
יהודה [ihudá] is Judea, but then many nations (such as russians) know Judea as iudéa
In french it is Judée[жудэ́] which sounds very much like жыды.


and here's some more geography:

Rusland (dutch name for Russia) is a village in the heart of GB (an the only nation we all call Great)



wieśPO(country, village) sounds as вещьRU(thing)

Make villages countries!

is poland closer to europe than россия? do they share the po in the initial position of their names, but read it differently? possia пастбище? rus is village, wieś

wieś ~ we-ʃ ~ vi-ʒ ~ village

mieszkaniec [мешка́нец] inhabitant (reminds мещанин, видимо от место(село) или от вмещается, помещается, мешается.. пользский может ещё чудовее русского быть)

English is way better, yeah, so why don't we forget all the other languages? To do what exactly? To speak different languages to be able not to understand the others, to prevent them from imposing their rule.

We should not allow others to dictate their rule over us, if we're not doing anything wrong.
I imagine a perfect society, a state in which I'd like to be, but then I don't know anything about anything. I didn't even imagine the consequences of removing an upper will: that will slows down or moderates wills of other people. How does your village fight crime if criminals cut it out? Those perpetrators should be transmitted to the neighbouring villages, so that those people fight or flight them.

I am an inventor, testings are needed. First let's try several regions to implement that new way of doing things (not to control the regions) and see what happens: other regions will attack that region to prevent such reform in their wotchinas (районы, на которых они смотрящие (watchers watchmen))

I want direct democracy, but as they (((politicians))) say, a conversation with an average voter is the best argument against democracy.

We should take tv out of hands of jews to have educated voters, but I can see the power which is against such reform. I wonder if it ever happens, but then вера города берёт. I need something stronger, to take over the world. Magic is the key.

Magic or science? Science is to understand the world, magic is to change it. Magic is technology.



Be

Do

Five
Four
For oF
iF

Go

He Him His
Here
Hi
High

I

Jack

Kid
Kidding

but at J I began to use words not that basic, I should have skipped J and K and LK

aM Me My

No

aRe

iS

To
There Then Than
    The This That These Those
    They Their Them                  (эти две на одном развороте)
Think Thought
Thin Thick

We
What
Who Whom Whose
Where
When
White (незаполненное? what?)
Wild Word Wind West(on this page west-north-east-south are all given in a compass)

You (bukva V showing at the reader in some spectacular way)
(also refers to we being its inversion, as for and of are (as до и от are in russian))

to ты
от us? ons? -off ~ -us?


Be Go Do

Go~See

Do and Die are antonyms because one is Woo! (бу!) and other is ай (ouch)

aM

aRe

iS

Be c d e f g h i j k l aM n o p q r S t u v w x y z? or Am Be iS aRe or Am Be aГe iC (as R is before S (and that makes c staveless d (Ч(4))))
ЗЧ are great 34
I?ЗЧ would be 1234 (and though ? does look like 2, it was there to tell that I cannot find a good 2, but then.. ɪгзч
and those igzч are somewhat eastern-order (compare to japanese agasatana)

Aз Вы Сии(they, this(сие))



Grammatic structures within alphabet:

1) A B C ~ Aз Вы Сии(they, this(сие))

2) Ʌ  I  V [a i u] a(one) I(me) U(you(Вы(V))
and this tells Ʌ to take a walk: I and V are more fundamental in every conversation. I and V are the first two digits of roman numerals.
(a i u are the only three vowels in old-persian and most of filipino scripts, and I have to compare them to lampung)

3) O eRe eS esT

(whether it is what was actually placed into the alphabets by their creators or is it a poetic interpretation of it, it is remarkable)




г and п reflect each other in both system, even though if lampung.. and wiki doesn't know such script; omniglot does. wiki though returns something very similar, yet different:





So, I compared them:

And I saw directly identical shapes, just written differently, and it made me wonder if that gha I didn't find is that Ngga! (and they messed up by transliterating the samy glyph and Nya and Nja in Rejang)

And this one has its unicode block: ꤰ ꤱ ꤲ ꤳ ꤴ ꤵ ꤶ ꤷ ꤸ ꤹ ꤺ ꤻ ꤼ ꤽ ꤾ ꤿ ꥀ ꥁ ꥂ ꥃ ꥄ ꥅ ꥆ
these look somewhat different in my browser, well, let's compare the order to be sure:



ꤰ ꤱ ꤲ ꤳ ꤴ ꤵ ꤶ ꤷ ꤸ ꤹ ꤺ ꤻ ꤼ ꤽ ꤾ ꤿ ꥀ ꥁ ꥂ ꥃ ꥄ ꥅ ꥆ was tricky, but they go in this order,


so I did it:



So rikung-rijang unicode placing ꥆ at the final position explains that vowels in the eastern-orders are not first, but the last. In hiragana-katakana they're the first. And in iroha too, though it's i there.


ꥃ the funniest glyph. I'm gonna make it a meme


and here's some more on this from an academic paper:



Tifinagh and Brahmic remind each other by those dots:
ⴰⴱⴲⴳⴴⴵⴶⴷⴸⴹⴺⴻⴼⴽⴾⴿⵀⵁⵂⵃⵄⵅⵆⵇⵈⵉⵊⵋⵌⵍⵎⵏⵐⵑⵒⵓⵔⵕⵖⵗⵘⵙⵚⵛⵜⵝⵞⵟⵠⵡⵢⵣⵤⵥⵦⵧ⵰⵿ⵯ
𑀀    𑀁    𑀂𑀃𑀄𑀅𑀆𑀇𑀈𑀉𑀊𑀋𑀌𑀍𑀎𑀏𑀐𑀑𑀒   𑀓𑀔𑀕𑀖𑀗𑀘𑀙𑀚𑀛𑀜𑀝𑀞𑀟𑀠𑀡𑀢𑀣𑀤𑀥𑀦𑀧𑀨𑀩𑀪𑀫𑀬𑀭𑀮𑀯𑀰𑀱𑀲𑀳𑀴𑀵𑀶𑀷
and also by tifinagh ⴻ being ə at the position of e, and brahmic 𑀈 being some i, and in some fonts also looking like a vertical stick with dots at its sides, only in the centre those dots are (and that is how FireFox shows it, SeaMonkey shows it as quadratic ⵆ)

Those are so interesting, but who has time for it?
May be lay out ht e (those are ther) foundations, or maybe my foundation will be left behind and those who come after me do it from scratch.


So here's some brahmi
containing the ī I was speaking of:
(and now I wonder what is the text to the left, like what language, what writing system is that?)

Whether their culture is ancient or not, it seems to be in a dismay. All the visual noise in the background, all the uneven lines, like low culture man, but hey, they have better:
Kannada script:




it reminds tifinagh a lot:

Tifinagh is weird: ⵕ and ⵚ are ṛ and ṣ



I wonder why these tifinaghs don't show vowels other than a (and y isn't vowel)
Because compare them to this:
ⴰⴱⴲⴳⴴⴵⴶⴷⴸⴹⴺⴻⴼⴽⴾⴿⵀⵁⵂⵃⵄⵅⵆⵇⵈⵉⵊⵋⵌⵍⵎⵏⵐⵑⵒⵓⵔⵕⵖⵗⵘⵙⵚⵛⵜⵝⵞⵟⵠⵡⵢⵣⵤⵥⵦⵧ⵰⵿ⵯ
so do tuareg scripts not have vowels or is it a fluke?



The muses are told to be the mothers themselves, nine muse (those we're taught today) used to be three muses, and some said it was even one.

Past Present Future
Math Texts Music
    A       E       U
           Lyrics   Tunes, Grooves, Loops, cuts? sumples? (no, kʌts and sempls)
             ee~i      Tones (oo~u) o~ɪ? o~ו! but u~ו too, but then is v ע ?וו is literally o the 𐎓 (double 𐎂? 𐎂 is gamma, digamma is F. F~V!)          ~beware~of~hebrew~(double~vav~is~before~eyn)~
Г the yang
V the yin?

𐤂 & V!

but why in different alphabets? not to see it, the secret of the Г ~ V duality is probably protected, but I'm sorry, conspirators, science has rediscovered it, and you probably don't mind, because the conspiracy (if one took place) was sugubo in the past.
сугубо has that губо of губить in it. губами губят выпивая, поедая.
and is it because it can be translated as finally (can it?) or what is even the etymology of that word?
сугубо~сильно(сгибает? настаивая?)
Сегодня это слово употребляется в значении «исключительно, совершенно, полностью, всецело», но так было не всегда. Исконное его значение было совсем другим. Сугубоватися — существовать в двух вариантах. Сугубина — двойное количество, парный орган, прибыль, двоедушие, лукавство.

Three mothers being past, present and future and math, lyrics, music at the same time maybe because math humans learnt to write 50 thousand years ago. written texts hardly ever existed before 5 thousand years ago. Between those points in time tens of thousands of years of mathematical texts. What am I talking about? First marks placed for a reason and first actual textual writing systems.
A number of anthropological artefacts have been conjectured to be tally sticks:
    The Lebombo bone, dated between 44,200 and 43,000 years old, is a baboon's fibula with 29 distinct notches, discovered within the Border Cave in the Lebombo Mountains of Eswatini.
    The so-called Wolf bone (cs) is a prehistoric artefact discovered in 1937 in Czechoslovakia during excavations at Dolní Věstonice, Moravia, led by Karl Absolon. Dated to the Aurignacian, approximately 30,000 years ago, the bone is marked with 55 marks which some believe to be tally marks. The head of an ivory Venus figurine was excavated close to the bone.[2][3]
    The Ishango bone is a bone tool, dated to the Upper Palaeolithic era, around 18,000 to 20,000 BC. It is a dark brown length of bone. It has a series of possible tally marks carved in three columns running the length of the tool. It was found in 1950 in Ishango (east Belgian Congo).[4]
I believe I saw a neolythic tally-stick with what was said to be an addition exercise..
Counting in prehistory was first assisted by using body parts, primarily the fingers. This is reflected in the etymology of certain number names, such as in the names of ten and hundred in the Proto-Indo-European numerals, both containing the root *dḱ also seen in the word for "finger" (Latin digitus, cognate to English toe).
Early systems of counting using tally marks appear in the Upper Paleolithic. The first more complex systems develop in the Ancient Near East together with the development of early writing out of proto-writing systems.

I think that Ishango bone is the one which is told to be some arythmetic, and they tell that Lebombo bone is probably a measurement of a month, a primitive caledar, for women, because it has exactly 29 tallies, but then it is broken as the marks went, so who knows if it didn't have more. Or is it was broken, because somebody erroneausly added more (as we have 30 and 31 in our months, totally out of tune)
So math we know from the past, texts we write are current technology. And probably they only wished to have musical notation, and before Pythagoras we probably didn't have any. Or probably we had some. five vowels + B&T could be that musical notation, ba would be different from ta by the instrument maybe. Ba is барабан, Та is string, струна, рука! бит ногой, 𓃀! and other wave is made by hand, thus 𓂧!
B and D

and if we wrote from bottom up, as runes and ogham can, then we'd have them as

and if we wanted to show C for Спина, then
or

Δ
Γ
Β

or, really, when there were only B and D (B&T)

ᚦ    could we draw hands that bad? there were times when we couldn't paint
ᛒ    well, most of humans cannot paint well to this day, but they would draw better hands

so tongue and lips is much better interpretation. And that is why they look differently in different nations: norsk runes show ᛒ & ᚦ as lips and tongue (were they beatboxing what egyptians played and thus showed them as 𓃀 and 𓂧?)


Buddha, what a word!



I wonder if Dispilio Tablet is text,


They say, that it's some random decoration, but I can see some peculiar moments: it is not carved all over, but with some short strokes it's carved, and the strokes are of the same depth, which means systemity. And I can also see the horizontal lines made of those strokes in the very centre, as if they wanted to separate two texts one from the other, so that is a строка. My guess, brand new, I didn't see anything in it before, as many don't. Let's keep on looking into it and study cuneiform and linear B, maybe some ten or twenty years later I can see it for what it is.


Math ~ Path ~ Past ~ Mast

Myth ~ Miss (and Missis) Mist?

Mus ~ Muse (but then are they all three not?) Must! or is orthography disinforming me?

Moth? Meth? (there's no muth, but these two are)
Muth is mouth in Old-Frisian and Old-Saxon [ˈmuːθ]

Muth being mouth makes perfect sense, for music is of mouth, when ᛒ and ᚦ are lips and tongue.
Math is of Marks, Myth is in images? as churches are covered in their myths. I-mages?


Math (mind)
Myth (eyes) Mith, My eyes!
Muth (mouth)

A
I    and this would look more to the point as 一ー [i:] (or was it just 一 the ꟷ? one бров one love?)
U

あ
い
う       looks more to the point,
with あ being hair (with a hair pin at the top (A is the forehead with the hair tied together))
with い being two eyes (the strokes probably show that they (as the eye-lids) open and close up and down, and う is an open mouth with a moustache above it (or is it a nose? m and n are nasals)

We can distinguish tongue's vibration of N from lips' vibration of M, even though all air flow goes through nose in both cases.



what a great way to study japanese:

I didn't catch the second one, but nakanaru like naku of nai (no) and naru (become) is awesome.
also how noEN is naJA the same way soEN is saJA is almost incredible.



Тула and Тверь have so similar names they could be cognates.
(Tvl  and Tvr)
And if you look from moscow to the Europe, tuLa and tvRь are literally L & R.

And this is a good example of what this story gives: the look at the world from some unexpected level. You would never look like this to see the next European Capital.

tvL and tvR (good Left & good Right? only jews would know tov)
Великие Луки (великие руки (длинная рука москвы))



A heAd? the Aid is in the head (the memory of sinful events torturing the sinner?)
 I  eyes are I's
U уста [ustá] is mouth in russian

устье реки = river mouth

and what is even more pardoxical is that исток реки is her head (also springhead, fountain, source)


source has that ur sound which combines u and r, is it some specific phoneme of Ur? could the name of the centre of civilization of a moment be influcening influenting such deep words of other languages?
кроме как бессмысленной пары париж и впарить (как в анекдоте про пизу) может по праге прогуляться, но это лишь поэзия не более того. хотя, стоящие часы дважды в день правы.



B D E F Г I
meat taking off the body so that B is Body, D is eДа? 𓏏 as a loaf of bread.

E is skElEton

F is Forward, Future (even some bone is gone)
Г is Gone
I is итог, исчез, иссох, ice


I wonder how Google's motto (first being "Don't Be Evil" now being "Do The Right Thing" is not
"Be GooD" since they rebranded as Alphabet.
Also check the L looking like S:



I'm watching Marie Cachet's videos on runes, which I wanted her to make, and her approach is unique, she's not retelling the common knowledge, she dares to give her own interpretations, and though they're dubious, it is an encourageable effort, good for her. Let's talk to her now.

so many cognates can be seen:
valda is of will and владеть
róge is of rogue and rude and red and ру́гань, руга́ть
Fehu and Fé.. not so much. Are they of some other language? Of some more ancient language?
The other word for antler is buckhorn, and that is a name of a plant. Could runes be associated with plants the way oghamic alphabet is? And I can google: "Two of the runes are specifically linked to trees. Eiwaz represents the yew tree and Berkana, the birch tree. The yew tree is a symbol for Yggdrasil and is linked to death and the everlasting realm beyond death. The tree is poisonous and its wood was used to make long bows for hunting and war." well, you may know more.
er is of are (and est is closest in russian and latin (rus is village in latin, which is in accord with that word being used in the sense of oblast they call kievan rus and novgorod rus now.
frænda is friend or friends(?)
róg is tears, рвёт, as with a horn
is ok = og (and (nd~ŋ?))
flóð = flood
viti = ? свети? увидь? vision? ведать?
graf = grave
seiðs = sage?
gata is way, from "go" then.
fylkir probably has something to do with fuhrer, and probably with follow and вел (вёл is the opposite of followed, but probably it's the dual process, and where one tells follow, others say вели́ (this word is both "led (the past tense of lead)" and "command")
aurum is latin for gold alright
But why do you translated it as an entity separate from the poem?
In other sources they translate Fé as Wealth, and then the double words by which Fé is described are kennings, gold's leader is a wealthy man. Fire in the flood is a successful guy, who manages to keep his spark up even in disaster, maybe because the castle is on the hill.
But let's criticize others too:
Is there a chance that ᚠ of ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚲ(ᚷᚹᚺᚾ)ᛁ is (ᚨᚩᚪᚫᚬᚭᚮᚰᚯ) of ᚨᛒᚦᛂᚠᚵᚼᛁ (B is V in russian, ᚢ is V, ᚦ is at the same third position, ᚨ and ᛂ are both vowels, and englishmen read a as e, so it seem it didn't matter which way the glyph was turned, letter was a letter, or, it's merely a speculation. but ᚹ is amongsht h's and both ᚺ and ᚼ are h's and ᛁ there follows, and after I's we have ᛃᛇᛈᛉᛊᛏᛒᛖᛗᛚ(ᛜ/ᛝ)ᛞᛟ in futhark and in the alphabetic runestone from Bornholm ᚴᛚᛘᚿᚮᚱᛦ(if R, or ᛣ if Q)ᛋᛏᚢ and both end in ᛟ and ᚢ who are similar letters (oo is u in english) and ᛞ(d) (double ᚦ?) is not that different from ᛏ, and that very ᛏ in "futhark" order goes right after ᛊ, which is another shape of ᛋ and ᛋᛏ in one sequence is ᛊᛏ in the other, and ᛇᛈᛉ looks like OPR, and ᛃ after ᛁ is literally j, so the sequence has very many rudiments of alphabet sequence, but is it possible that they mistransliterated ᚨ as ᚠ (many amateurs confuse the two, or do they copy some other artefacts?) ᛗ and ᛚ being placed past T could tell that they are of later origin, but then this research is only in its infancy, but I felt like sharing it to tell that if you're wrong, you're not the only one who's wrong.  The different order, and it being broken into ættir, thus keeping the connection to Norns, who are known all over the cultures under different names, and in the greek myth about the creation of alphabet they're the creators of it as well, and the way that myth holds in the norsk tradition, and graphic similarity of runes to archaic italic scripts predating latin, and to paleohispanic syllabries, which are structurally more ancient than runes, and could be the source of all european alphabets, and not phoenician, which is in no way different from modern alphabets in its structure, it even fell further from grace by forgetting vowels, even though rudiments of them still can be met in the letters, standing at the position of vowels, when you compare the alphabets.


(two words) and (two words) and (two words) yeah, those are kennings
if Fé is wealth, fee is a great cognate to it. If it's antler, what are the possible cognates to Fe of Feoh? If it's wealth, it is also the root of pay (and being the first letter probably also of buy, and here the short-twig ᛒ the ᛓ come in handy. Are ᚠᚢ actually ᛓᚢ and in direct relation to russian БВ [bv] in their abecedary order ABVGDE.. they started telling to us about abecedaries and their origins long befor they knew something about them. I think only few scholars ever did comparative analysis of the writing systems, and those works are rudimentary and it's fair to say that we humans only started to understand these things. And about the B being the first letter, it probably was the first letter: it is the first letter in ogham; it is the first consonant, and as such it would be the first when it was syllabary, and is it a rudiment of syllabaries, that they to this day teach as as ba bi bu, or was it ba bu bi (in ogham vowels go not in aiu order, but in aui order) and there's a joke about babubi, the joke was presented to me as "how the first language appeared: three ..neanderthals gathered together, one said ba, the other said bu, the third say bi (the joke is that in russian бабу бы is "I would have a woman" or "we would have a woman" it's "woman would be nice" and it's only two words because babu is Accusative case of baba (which is both granny and a rude (probably by being archaic) form of woman (not necessarily rude, some people are that rude at their normal settings) and a cognate of babe (which would be Genetivus of baba) and bi (бы (in ukrainian it would be би, if they didn't reduce it to б, they write ы as и and in russian и is i in aeiou vocalization of аеиоу (now there's vowel ё after е, but it is rather recent addition))) so I got distracted, бы is would


if vowels were endings in different colours of cases, then o would be u, because ending o doesn't mean anythiong, but u does: баба, бабе, бабы, бабу (and и would be read in ukrainian way)
but then comes out ablativus: бабой

and in japanese vowels are endings of the verbs. I think I should compare the two vowel-sets and their semantic symilarities if there are any.


and is it a similarity, that ба́бы of singularis genetivus (there's also plural nomenativus бабы́) is a double of бабий, and that い is directly ий for as russian adjectives end with й, so that い also makes adjectives in japanese, but not directly a similarity, proximity though, affinity.
бабу is no way a simple form, but бабе could be an imperative (hand it to her)
so it's hard to say, but it surely may facilitate memorization of e-form.
and that pdf had the other part:

it is a great educational material, only I'm not going to delve into it right now, let's talk our stuff instead:

 БВ ГД
BV GD
of russian alphabet may tell something.. bo vu gi da? bhagavadgita?
The Bhagavad Gita (IPA: [ˌbʱɐɡɐʋɐd ˈɡiːtɑː], Sanskrit: भगवद्गीता, romanized: bhagavad-gītā, lit. 'God's Song'),[a] often referred to as the Gita (IAST: gītā), is a 700-verse Hindu scripture, which is part of the epic Mahabharata. The Bhagavad Gita is dated to the second half of the first millennium BCE. Even though Hinduism includes several denominations, the Gita holds a unique pan-Hindu influence as the most prominent sacred text. It has been noted that if there is any one text that comes near to embodying the totality of Hindu thought, it is the Bhagavad Gita.
From B to Ta (त is the first letter of the last lingual group)

प and त reflect each other as other b and d pairs, only here it is p and t, similar to f & t.
(you can see it more clearly, if you know that the upper stroke is the stave, and in this sense not a part of the letter.

But if it's called the god's song, then could this word be attributed to something else at first? Because the text of it doesn't even start with b, nor is it very oh-wow, I didn't dig into it, excuse me.

गीता [gita] song
From the root गै (gai, “to sing”). Cognate with Avestan 𐬔𐬁𐬚𐬁 (gāθā, “form of strophe, metre, namely the collections of Zarathustra's songs, the Gathas”).

The Gathas (/ˈɡɑːtəz, -tɑːz/)[1] are 17 Avestan hymns traditionally believed to have been composed by the prophet Zarathushtra (Zoroaster). They form the core of the Zoroastrian liturgy (the Yasna). They are arranged in five different modes or metres.
The Avestan term gāθā (𐬔𐬁𐬚𐬁 "hymn", but also "mode, metre") is cognate with Sanskrit gāthā (गाथा), both from the Proto-Indo-Iranian word *gaHtʰáH, from the root *gaH- "to sing".

and these songs also didn't touch my heart today, maybe later I return to them, it takes many approaches before you can grasp something that big. And the image is important, because Mazda (the Ahura Mazda) asks asha (knowledge) something, and there asha is described as what it is basically, and as some early philosophy it is surely is interesting. I definitely may give it another try. The quote on the title page is also bad-ass.
Ameretat as a cognate of russian Неумерание неумер неумирание неумирает, неумер неумирать is very cool.
So is this double triangle zoroastrian? Solomon's seal is five-pointed, as their grammar of sefer yetzirah separates the alphabet into five groups. And because old-persians had only three vowels, I cannot help but think of two-vowel system of triangles: ABG & EFJ (literally EFI.. and where's Г? is G Г? or is it ABD? the only alphabet, in which the first-line is tirliteral, tells ᛆᛒᚦ)
ᛆᛓᚦ [abd]
ᛅᚠᛄ [efj]  (

why is ᛄ[j] so similar to ᛳ[oo]? not more than


ᛡ and ᛄ are both staved forms of ᛃ
(but then some ᛡ-like runes are actually ᚼ, but that is all J, it behaves this way.

ᛁᛃᛇ in elder futhark is
ᛁᛄᛇ in old-frisian


and after that vowel claster what follows is pi and ti (and with an R betwiin between them)
ᛈᛉᛋᛏO-F and ᛈᛉᛊᛏE-F are literally PRST

are they two different runes? this subject is rather complicated,


ᚠᚢᚦᚩᚱᚳᚷᚹ ᚻᚾᛁᛄᛇᛈᛉᛋ ᛏᛒᛖᛗᛚᛝᛞᛟ ᚪᚫᚣ  ᛠ   ᛡᚸᛣᛢᛥᛤ: Later Anglo-Saxon Futhorc (8c.~12c.) is said to be 33-type Fuþorc, but it has 34 runes

ᚭ and ᛓ reflect each other as a and б

Abe
   Б-г
      G-d
          DEuͣs (and ity under us)
             Eve?
               Fag Gah (thus g is zain (z stands in the place of g in greek and russian merges z & g as as z & ))
                 
z=ass=S (AMS (амиши (они узнали еврейский секрет и живут по старинке (глупый секрет? (не знаю, может дело вкуса и генетически-обусловленных предпочтений (всё смесь генетики и впечатлений))))))

                          Hi
                             Ik
                               call
                                   l-m?
                                     man.. Now let's try to play with IMNL
                            Hi
                              I'm
                                Man   
                                    No   
                                       L? не мир но меч? no love? pray to remove something?
                                       Up
                                         pick
                                             querre (guerre)
                                                                Rasta! (выращивапй (п was some истая autowriting, it felt as if I would hicked inside (hick is a single hiccup!) ))
                                                       
This second part (also L is missed, with L it would play even that) tells that it's quite random, so the magic alphabet goes not further than


Was jay placed to make that call joke call? to sweep dilettants from the line?
I-j(I[ай]) j-k(joke) k-l(call)
K-M (come) would be a good sequence, and was this changed? This sequence is different in differnt nations. Call LaMb?

LaMb = La Mb (m~ا ,𐩣~l (I don't know how your browser shows what's in the previous brackets, but there should be m~ᛒ-like south arabian 𐩣[m] and after comma arabic Aleph the ا[a] being compared to L, just as Ʌ is a, and Λ is l))
is LamB the key to IAWB

(it came from T the L being opposite to B the B, and am being aum the a and the u (W~M, v~ν))


alef is L and F (1  & 2) and they could easily be the T and B (but it's later mindless addition is exposed by the inverted order. The direct order is B and T, and B and C, B and D are just in that order.

BeTa tells B & T. Delta is porbably a later addition. And what about gamma? Г𐤂 and M?

is beta B-D
is gama 𐤂-M ?
a line of normal (including B, V, P, F, D, Z, T, S, G, K, H)
an a line of sonor (including M, L, N, R, molenaar? miller in dutch)
but that 𐤂 is not L, but Г, which I saw as Ŋ, thus some sonor G, and it would explain K amongst sonors (I didn't place it there by the line of reasoning of how g is both д and g, but who knows really) J is also sonor sometimes.



Wanted to explore what is behind 𐌵 𐌷 𐌿 𐍁 symmetries,


𐌰 𐌱 𐌲 𐌳 𐌴 𐌵 𐌶 𐌷 𐌸 𐌹 𐌺 𐌻 𐌼 𐌽 𐌾 𐌿 𐍀 𐍁 𐍂 𐍃 𐍄 𐍅 𐍆 𐍇 𐍈 𐍉 𐍊

𐌵 𐌷 𐌿 𐍁 are q h u ? 𐍁 is also q, for it is told to be From Ancient Greek Ϙ (Q) (koppa), but it is also told to be The eighteenth letter of the Gothic alphabet, with a numerical value of 90 and no phonetic value.
so what is the 𐌿 anomaly? or is it directly from ᚢ? but is the order genuine? for there it is at the valid, pre-labial position, but in Bornholm's alphabet ᚮ is in that position, which makes the union of Ɔ and U in ѹ and ꙋ and Ꙋ and ו! making so much more sense.

𐌿 and 𐍀 look so similar, that it's hard not to think that labiality was presented that way.
and even 𐌷 being h reminds labiality in that ha gives birth to wa, ba, pa in japanese
So 𐌵 and 𐍁 oppose them as q opposes b?
so is 𐌷 a form of b? the gothic way, the way they also don't close loops in 𐌱 and 𐍂
(telling that K~R the way B is b? R is Р, and P is П, gosh it is complicated, and п(п) looks like n(n))



Speaking of signatures, check the funny mess of Bill Hicks's one

s is recognized in the end, unles that loop isn't x, well, those swashes are artistic, you should have seen my signature, you'd think I'm illiterate.




Be Do
Eat Go
Meat God (got is past form of go? no, of get. is get past form of go?)

drink ~ dr?-ing ~ during (drink we should during the day)
milk? (I drink milk, luckily for me I can drink up to two litres a day, and so my belly doesn't hurt, it seems we're in some symbiosis with the cows)


Bharat is a silly-sounding name, but it is an alphabetic name.
(maybe resemblance of Borat gives it that silly vibe)


татарское зур (зур рахмат, зур беляш) is a cognate of deutsche sehr (sehr gut)



Аллах ~ Араб
Jove ~ Jew
jhvh (h is some vowel? silent when do not know the vowel? omitions in texts are to test foreigners and dumb natives? Why is jewish name for god is so much roman? Because romans are their superstrate.
Русь ~ Род (Россия ~ Родина (Едина ~ Eccия(Мессия)))

это к тому, что поскольку бог относится к народу, который в него верит, то и имя бога сродни имени племени. Потому и Я ~ Jah, что народ по местоимениям могли определять (отражения местоимений вроде ya (you in english and dutch and I in russian and such; we is we in english, but you in russian (вы))


Naм & Им have this symmetry, and in russian N used to look like N (now it loos like H: Н) and this lexics is definitely from the period, when russian Н[n] looked like N
n ~ п? n ~ п! then p[p] = р[r] and then n~r (so fire is fine (naturally fire was named by fire-worshippers. Fire is fine. shine shаR (𒊹) and sun is sur, šur (are all sonors the same? probably not, but we'll see, yet l and r is the same in the east, and thus l is n, but I think these oppose m, and j is with them, a form of l probably, the ll, a dot is doubling? ё всегда ударная, но wut)))

ring ning? ring sing. s and r are at the same line, so it's only natural to consider them the same:


demon ~ de moon
(dmitrij is of demetra, de metre? de mother? (whether Demetra id Dea Mythra or ))

so angels were alients (spirits) from other planets? before we thought of venus and mars, we'd think of Sun and the Moon (son and mom? Jesus and Mary, two people to pray to, patriarchal and matriarchal traditions are beaming through the modernity (obsolete for centuries, if it ever was to be, like communism (today there're many more reasons not to try it, but is it obsolete? much less than christianity in that sense, but if it's not worth keeping (thus obsolete) then why is it so popular? people are not very bright, even the most intelligent people are rather dumb)))




Look what I found yesterday, at the collection of the hive-mind's brain-storm's:
https://scan1707.blogspot.com/2019/08/blog-post.html (mirror)



в русско-украинском ещё больше расхождение: год. в русском a year, а в украинском a minute or minutes. year is рiк in ukrainian.
година ~ частина?

не по дням, а по чесам (часы чешут? быстро идут? идут. вибрация передаётся на грубых механизмах. часы считают же, четают чатают часают? час часть дня. один подход, один урок, одна встреча)


для англичан мы сами те ещё хохлы: сравни сын и son
(здесь речь о том, что хохлы часто произносят и там где кацапы произносят о: кот is кіт)
(кацап обидное слово, потому что it's кац up (жиды сверху (и это обидно потому что правда)))
(а хохол вроде с любовью, за чубы казацкие (да, интересно как они это воспринимают, может на их языке это слово имеет иные коннотации, может они и не знают что чуб это хохолок (может для них там слышится ох лол или лол лох, huh-lol (but I'm hardly ukrainian, so I can only guess (thus inventing the mean connotations which хохол probably never had (кацап и есть (скорей всего украинец слышит в этом слове что-нибудь иное, быть может тоже доброе и любящее (hello russian! хуёво окрашено? или  who is it? хуй ссыт (голландцы при встрече говорят хуй, конфликт неизбежен (you gotta keep em separated (fuck, I hate that song, that band)))))))))))
(и даже в этом безобидном случае англичанам может показаться, что мы каверкаем их слова,


Here I figured the way Rimbaud coloured the vowels:
A noir, E blanc, I rouge, U vert, O bleu
сейчас смотрю, и первые две буквы чёрное и белое, остальные три дают основные цвета, где синий и зелёный столь же близки как О и U, зелёный противостоит красному как U противостоит I, в последовательности совпадающей с последовательностю в радуге. Может он что-то знал?
Also a and e make sense in the way I decyphered ☯ as happy e of yeah and some a of ah

U and O is not the alphabetic order. Did Arthur change it to keep it as in the rainbow and to oppose I and U at the same time? Or does he tell, that sea.. blue became more important for us later, for before that we didn't sail, and thus didn't distinguish location by the colour of the sea, and yet we could tell red and green both fruit and leaves. So red and green didn't stand for bad and good, for red fruit is good, red leave is bad; green leave is good, green fruit is not good yet. Bad is bu-yet? not yet?

A noir, E blanc, I rouge, U vert, O bleu : voyelles,   but then taking the whole line didn't help: the word voyelles ..voice-elle? femelle? syllables ending in vowels are considered female.
Were there so many more males than females?
I guess in the realm of gods there are much more male deities than female ones. And it correlates the patriarchal takeover: in the previous stage of the alphabet

When there were female deities, le dies.. la dies! we had five vowels and only two consonants.
Who would those two male entities be? Apollo? I like the name, it's very alphabetic. AOI? if we take the vowels after which those A P L stand. A is the vowl herselv. B and T.. Бог и Toefel! Teufel!
[больше похоже на бу́зе чем на бёзе] Böse ~ abuser? бузатёр?

Rimbaud lists the vowels not in alphabetic, but in the rainbow order.


Wolfram's office sent me this book after I've shown them my triangles:

and 1110 reminds me the multiplication pattern

It looks like the repeating pattern of a man running along the other side.
It looks like it's in 3d. is multiplication a projection of the 3d world?
Actually yes, multiplication is planar
actually, it was more man-like when I at first took a more noisey picture:


but then I checked it, and this was the closest to that:
(somewhat similar, but very different patterns)

there number-bases in which such hair grow and can reach quite a size, and there are number-bases in which the chaos is complete. And they go in groups.
If somebody told me that it reflects in plants on some level, I would say yeah, probably.
and in this particular case the pattern isn't just repeating up there too, it goes growing and changing:

It is as if that blue element is not changing per se, but he fucks with different species of it's kind.
It is like us spending the third of our life in bed.
Pay attention to the blue person when it is shown the first. It is a bably. Instead of two legs гусеничка.
So when the added person is longer are those orgies or the person is pregnant? or the other blue elements of that other person are in it too (but never separated, though who knows where it evolves the everchanging)
The light-blue is also a colour which doesn't repeat anywere else too but in the very beginning look at it, a mistery, a mystery, мистерия, mystery-play
(mistery and misery are they etymologically connected?

the light-blue is five. five doesn't survive in the deep.
those colours are 12345 repeating, at the borders, and they are multiplyin, and only the first number of the result is placed into the colour under them. For such task rhombic monitors would be great. Rotating monitors, rotating round this axis too. round monitors. attached to the lower (also round) part by magnets. Now this invention I lay down here for everyone to see, because I will never do it myself anyway, I have so many projects going on. Even though I know that focus is the key. Well, I don't give them up, that's the spirit!

But I have to reprioritize somewhat, this language book went so far, and it will take some mind-extension for most of people to get it anyway, and when they have such technology, it can do this work for me that's for sure, that's like Wolfram has shown the whole class of those patterns by bruteforcing them all. Not all, even in base three he gave some enormous number, and I research this thing by another axis, yet I don't know may be he found my thing closer to the end of his book, I'm yet at the beginning of it. Should I keep on reading feeding this third passion of mine or should I scroll it through looking for my thing and to answer them so that they don't have to wait? Okay. but not today, I should focus on this second thing, because it's too late in the day to do the first one.



At? Add! Be  See Do
        Eat Find Go Hide Higher?
so guessing works: doing this experiment over and over again, I found the interpretation making more sense than the others, thus I inevitably find the real one by mere перебирание, перебор (о, какое слово (и я не знаю как перевести ни одно из его значений. g.t. gives overkill and plunk, but I'm not sure that is right. wiktionary usually does a better job: search, rundown, exhaustion, exhaustive search was the meaning I had in mind, but the word has some others: the one I had in mind is fingering, arpeggio, running over the strings. And it has another one: excess, surplus, and I also had it in mind, when I said oh what a word: many words have double meaning this one is triple, arpeggio! and there's a meaning I didn't know of: funeral bells in church, but I never knew it, and hardly it is far from the arpeggio thing; but then happy bells are перезвон. бор как забор? вывоз трупов? когда скотину держали, наверное много было мертвяка. В городах-то наверное меньше? Кишки хоронили? Говно из кишок? Кишки кости всё в дело шло, кого вывозить? ох блин, снова бред рандомный протёк, в серое его, если вообще не вырезать))
This азбука-set is interesting in that Find and Hide reflect eachother, and together with Go they make a successive narrative.. what the.. coherent story.
We should have play on instead of jumping to the analysis. So..
I Kan Like More Not
I KiLl My eNeMy?
I Kid My Light Night.. Light and Night  are also a good opposition.
And this line is tricky: every other has labial after vowel, but this one does not, and it is a line, different in italian and irish, both are claimed by catholics if it matters,
I L M N or I M L N or I M N L?
I Love My Nun
I Make Love Not War (not срам, if there was samekh)
I aM Not Lying (this one is eveng more beautiful than the previous one, because IMNL are Immanuel
(is it poetry? yep, poetry as a scientific method. Isn't poet also running down the variants of words until he finds those which make sense and rhyme and rhythm? an ai when it writes poems maybe may perform exhaustive search for each word, which reminds me what they say it is actually doing)
OPen, QeeRS!
Open queers.. AMS tells there was no ת, or is it a form of ש, for without the dot it is rather s.. is ת upsided down ש? but actually it looks like upsided down ע, and thus is it ש~ע the way a~d reflect eachother in different fonts (Д~А (Дмитрий Александрович, наконец-то вы пишите это правильно))
Looking at ש~ע, I cannot help but wonder are the A~Д somehow А~Ѧ? от А до Я is a meme, but come on! A~Ѧ ~ ש~ע, the way a-to-d reflect a-to-t (Ⰰ to T? as above so below?)
Isn't RST rasta? not in this variant.. but what is before rasta?
opq? there's no q in russian and greek.
опрст
о, просто!
о, прости!
это замечательное завершение молитвы!
(but then this reading I saw before, a food one indeed)
and F is diГamma for Food is twice as good as Гood
Eat Food Good Hood!
I aM No Lie is the champion of this line.
but then ох прости doesn't make much sense in the context, unless somebody tells you that you lied somewhere. Is alphabet ligned into not just a coherent story, but a holy scripture with short advice and Go, as they say, was added later, for before Ruga there was Z.. as for Zoeken.
Eat Feed G/Z? Hide (to hide a child you feed after you ate?)



It seems, jewish ritual words, the words not present in other cultures and thus to be preserved word of mouth, they must have preserved the original readings of the hebrew letters, because check this out:
מוֹהֵל‎ read as моэль shows that הֵ is e, and not because the double dot is beneath it (I think single dot is i, which is the opposite of the european tradition, where ee is i.


And returning to the blue figure, it is 3, and just as 5, 3 doesn't survive in the deep, swimming at the surface, yet 4 being the result of 2's are right there. And why don't 5 and 3 survive? because they would have to be carried further but the 1's and that is exactly what happens with the light-blue in the beginning, but then it never gets away, though how would I know it? the first five lines are always the same. And that's exactly where the everlasting creature lives, protected by the 1's:

the triangles of the ones.. but they never seem to grow the overall pattern seems to be perfectly random within the range of 1s, 2s and 4s:

yet in the closer look 1's and 2's are do tend to create their own specific triangular shapes, while 4 has to take whatever is left, but on the other hand 4's creat the same triangles the 2's are having.


Okay, I guess I have two hemispheres, and they can work in turns.


Big Good Dad (that is some beginning of the prayer ending in о прости.. but why would it begin in english to end in russian. So what I'm doing is writing some alphabetic poetry, so I have to write many, at least two, both languages may be hiding something, or I reinterpret it in the way that what.. And it is not such an off-the-wall an idea, so whoever performed reform in the alphabet, they would easily have a similar idea, so let's see what they could have put into this simingly meaningless sequence. Maybe, if the meanings behind letters were obvious to lay them as letters, maybe some poems show the meanings of theirs persistent within the lexicon.
So exhaustive search amongst all the possible poems we should do, and this trick neuronets truly master


Abe Б-г G-d D-e(us, a, um)
Eve? Vogue? Guh!
High I(ik) KL can be only kill, come on, as verb that is, but it is also cool, so keep it cool. No other word is a verb here. See, calm down, amigo (also call is kl: orthography never knows)
AMiGo is an alphabetic word! Good God is a super-amigo!

I am cool

Big Good Daddy is made by other rule, so more than one poem for each language may appear.
B~G for both are BiG? БиГ are similar letters,
b&h are both high letters, but then d is also high. but when abc was the first line, there was no d.
f is a big letter, in some fonts bigger than any other one, but maybe that is one it is tabooed in greek and sorta tabooed in furs russian?
before h, g is the only one going into the deep, and it being a modified c, introduced late, it makes me think that p and q are also of some later genesis, telling that b and d are also b and g, for g is both (I wish you see that g right, as an upside-down Б)


Ik kool lune? Ik come man? this is me trying to find the i-line built by the rule of the abe б-г g-d d-e, which is in hebrew, russian, english, latin saying pretty much the same thing. So shouldn't the rest of the poem be this multilingual synonymy?



Speaking of opposite letters, L and R are perfect example. L лежать and lay, R работать aRbeiten.

So let's see that Left and Right in the context of ..Бог и ТeUfell (te U is to you in dutch, but fell is viel (to fall is vallen, in more russian way: both dutch and rutch are using suffixes instead of prefix to. And it gives a deeper meaning: te vallen is не просто падать, а чтобы упасть. in english both are "to fall" and thus english gets this vagueness making its words multidimensional, allowing to make texts with different reading (as dna can be read in different frames. The same text of our dna literally can be read differently, so I heard and read, I think this is the consensus (but don't trust consensus, yeah, for I felt malfunction in the place on my arms where doctors pierced their needles (sanctity of the body is broken by doctors. they made me sick and sucked my blood for two years, and actually much more, they made us give blood in soviet schools. It was painful, and honestly it was child abuse. It probably was the legacy of Bogdanov. Red because they sucked blood, they bathed in blood. Bogdanov literally was, he was studying bloods and took blood from his son to inject himself, he died at 55, so hardly would the momentum go on after that. Most of them were idealists, but why else would they sticked needles into children to such suck their blood, it's obvious, they're satanists, )))))


I, me, call, noprst? no pqrst не покорюсь тебе?

тебе = Т Б (ты бери, ты будь, ты be)
мене = M N (me own)

бе ~ не? both are not exactly m. and is it why greek n (ν) looks so much as latin v (v)
thus тебе́ is you-in (you own, you take it in, at your place)
and мине́ is me-in (me own)
не=в? as prefix un-? as a the ã (the prefix a-)
в может быть звукоподражанием мычанию с зажатыми губами или что, когда пытают или просто настойчиво просят рот раскрыть, которое в сущности означает нет.

áa = no
aá = yes
(at least in russian it si so, I suspect it to be international, and thus how can one tell that that is not the proof that humans are all culturally related (that we genetically related genetics obviously tell))

áa = ís ɪt?
aá = ɪt ís'!

áa = не́а
aá = ага́

(and it could be a chapter in the "birth of language" movie. before that they would only have natural exclamations, like oh! or ha!



so, the protowords:

serie 1: a/e ~ ah/yeah (yeah ~ не ах?)



á = ахъ? then
áa = á-а (ах(ов)а)
aá = ага́ (не ах)  но у Высоцкого "не ах" значит плох. но либо прав, либо нет
aaá = хорошо́
áa = плохо

áa = ah-o(во)
aá = a ha (and probably that is what a-ha means: ага́ (different spelling of the same word))

ha is ha or hahahá, so why is it usually written as ha-ha?

ах ~ бах ~ бух ~ бох
бах вверк и всюду, бух вниз
ба́хнем = бухнё́м (и надо проверить на эмоциях случайных прошожих, как им кажется, а то для меня очевидно, что ба́хнем звучит гораздо позитивней, чем бухнё́м (хотя, в контексте áa и aá не известно как связана, вполне возможно что это бессвязный бред всё, мозг же тоже устаёт я его сегодня притянул за то что получается по полной. отдыхай!))
(and after that I took a bath where I wrote 12 cardboards on both sides)



т. точка
c. centre (also O (but then how can I know that it's ancient? ))
C is a form of T


ничтожества те кто уничтожают. создающие ничто. превращающие в ничто. ничто действа
ничтожить уменьшать, уничтожить полностью уменьшить.


house is the ours, for in dutch house is huis, at home is thuis[taus~θaus]


В собственно Скандинавии в относительно позднее время двенадцатиконечный крест нередко рассматривался как объединение четырех рун Maðr, развернутых под прямым углом друг к другу. По большому счету, это и есть простейшая форма символов ряда «Шлема Ужаса». В позднесредневековой Исландии этому знаку приписывали самые разные свойства: от «охраняет от всех несчастий» до «завоевать любовь девушки».
Со временем (по большей части – в Исландии) возникли и сложные формы «Шлемов», развившиеся из простых за счет усложнения «ветвления» каждого из лучей, а также – за счет удвоения числа базовых лучей (восемь вместо четырех). Некоторые из таких символов называются в исландских рукописях непосредственно Эгисхъяльм, другие получили собственные имена.
It is from Platov, but he doesn't give his sources, so take it with a grain of salt, if at all.

I thought about it, that just the way Moon has four visible stages, new moon, waxing moon, full moon, waning moon. And the way you separate it is up to you, but both new moon and full moon are dots of the days, all the other month is whether waxing or waning.

And the way they draw cross with four ends, and that each of the four ends is divided into three may explain the 12 months and 12 hours thing, even though there are more like 13 moons. 12.


wtf! I read that a month is not 28, but 29.5 days, and here's the opposite:
here, wiki explains:
The synodic month (Greek: συνοδικός, romanized: synodikós, meaning "pertaining to a synod, i.e., a meeting"; in this case, of the Sun and the Moon), also lunation, is the average period of the Moon's orbit with respect to the line joining the Sun and Earth: 29 (Earth) days, 12 hours, 44 minutes and 2.9 seconds.[5] This is the period of the lunar phases, because the Moon's appearance depends on the position of the Moon with respect to the Sun as seen from Earth. Due to tidal locking, the same hemisphere of the Moon always faces the Earth and thus the length of a lunar day (sunrise to sunrise on the Moon) equals the time that the Moon takes to complete one orbit around Earth, returning to the same lunar phase.
While the Moon is orbiting Earth, Earth is progressing in its orbit around the Sun. After completing its § Sidereal month, the Moon must move a little further to reach the new position having the same angular distance from the Sun, appearing to move with respect to the stars since the previous month. Consequently, at 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11.5 seconds,[5] the sidereal month is about 2.2 days shorter than the synodic month. Thus, about 13.37 sidereal months, but about 12.37 synodic months, occur in a Gregorian year.
Since Earth's orbit around the Sun is elliptical and not circular, the speed of Earth's progression around the Sun varies during the year. Thus, the angular velocity is faster nearer periapsis and slower near apoapsis. The same is true (to an even larger extent) for the Moon's orbit around Earth. Because of these two variations in angular rate, the actual time between lunations may vary from about 29.27 to about 29.83 days.[citation needed][6] The average duration in modern times is 29.53059 days with up to seven hours variation about the mean in any given year.[7] (which gives a mean synodic month as 29.53059 days or 29 d 12 h 44 min 3 s)[a] A more precise figure of the average duration may be derived for a specific date using the lunar theory of Chapront-Touzé and Chapront (1988):
29.5305888531 + 0.00000021621T − 3.64×10−10T2 where T = (JD − 2451545.0)/36525 and JD is the Julian day number (and JD = 2451545 corresponds to 1 January AD 2000).[9][10] The duration of synodic months in ancient and medieval history is itself a topic of scholarly study.[11]
sidereal: of or with respect to the distant stars (i.e. the constellations or fixed stars, not the sun or planets).
A sidereal day on Earth is approximately 86164.0905 seconds (23 h 56 min 4.0905 s or 23.9344696 h).


The etymology of Korea delivers:
Корё — государство на Корейском полуострове, появившееся после падения государства Силла в 935 году и существовавшее до воцарения династии Чосон в 1392 году.
Название «Корё» является сокращением от Когурё, одного из трёх раннефеодальных государств Кореи, объединённых Силлой в 668 году. Современное слово «Корея» происходит от «Корё».
Наиболее известные достижения государства — гончарное искусство Корё и Трипитака Кореана — буддийский канон (Трипитака), вырезанные на десятках тысяч деревянных досок. В Корё в 1234 году была создана первая в мире металлическая печатная матрица (см. Чикчи).
Когурё (кор. 고구려?, 高句麗?,[koɡuɾjʌ] кит. трад. 高句驪, упр. 高句丽, пиньинь gāogōulǐ, палл. Гаогоули, устар. Гао-Гюйли ; 37 до н. э. — 668) — государство народа когурё, говорившего на когурёском языке. Существовало в период Трёх корейских государств.
Современное название «Корея» происходит от названия средневекового государства Корё, которое, в свою очередь, является сокращением от «Когурё».

koryo is ko-ryo of koguryo the 高句麗[Gāojùlì(kaw-kow-li)]
高 [каw] high
句 [Jù(чюй)] sentence (what sentence? no matter this word was later removed)
麗 [li] Korea

li is Li, the dynasty which ruled Joseon, the state existing in Korea many centuries later, but that is only so in the russian wiki, english wiki doesn't tell it, it seems North and South have different history.
But actually, more like different orthography or pronunciation (I only started to learn korean, so take it lightly, or rather skip it)
The House of Yi, also called the Yi dynasty
is
Корейская императорская семья (кор. 대한제국의 황실,황실, кит. 大韓帝國皇室) — общее название для обозначения корейской монаршей династии Ли после провозглашения империи в 1897 году, в роли правящего дома Кореи (он просуществовал от создания государства Чосон в 1392 году до свержения империи японцами в 1910 году).
beware, because in english dynasty Li is something completely different:
To finish the Koguryo thing, their motto is: 천제지자 (천제의 자손) (天帝之子) "Son of God"
But then why finish it? This book is to deliver things you never knew, and here's another one:
and why are both walls told to be 1000 li, when one is shown three times longer than the other?
There's different 里, japanese 里, Ri, which is 3.927 km
In South Korea, the ri currently in use is a unit taken from the Han dynasty (206 BC–220 AD) li. It has a value of approximately 392.72 meters, or one tenth of the ri. The Aegukga, the national anthem of South Korea, and the Aegukka, the national anthem of North Korea, both mention 3,000 ri, which roughly corresponds to 1,200 km, the approximate longitudinal span of the Korean peninsula.


give/hide? a nothing or some basal antonyms?

трын-трава is a bilingua: трын is grass in sanskrit (तृण)



Here, check how ⰀⰁⰂ look like upside-down ᚠᚡᚢ
and how Ⰱ~ᚠ too!
it mandates a comparison of the rest
ⰀⰁⰂⰃⰄⰅⰆⰇⰈⰉⰊⰋⰌⰍⰎⰏⰐⰑⰒⰓⰔⰕⰖⰗⰘⰙⰚⰛⰜⰝⰞⰟⰠⰡⰢⰣⰤⰥⰦⰧⰨⰩⰪⰫⰬⰭⰮⰰⰱⰲⰳⰴⰵⰶⰷⰸⰹⰺⰻⰼⰽⰾⰿⱀⱁⱂⱃⱄⱅⱆⱇⱈⱉⱊⱋⱌⱍⱎⱏⱐⱑⱒⱓⱔⱕⱖⱗⱘⱙⱚⱛⱜⱝⱞ ᚠᚡᚢᚣᚤᚥᚦᚧᚨᚩᚪᚫᚬᚭᚮᚯᚰᚱᚲᚳᚴᚵᚶᚷᚸᚹᚺᚻᚼᚽᚾᚿᛀᛁᛂᛃᛄᛅᛆᛇᛈᛉᛊᛋᛌᛍᛎᛏᛐᛑᛒᛓᛔᛕᛖᛗᛘᛙᛚᛛᛜᛝᛞᛟᛠᛡᛢᛣᛤᛥᛦᛧᛨᛩᛪ᛫᛬᛭ᛮᛯᛰᛱᛲᛳᛴᛵᛶᛷᛸ
here I can see how ⰃⰄ remind ᚦ (and eachother, never saw them this way.
Isn't ᚨ  Ⰵ?
isn't ᚱ  Ⰸ? quite a stretch, and it had to be Ⱃ, upside down like the Ⰰ and Ⰲ (or are they runes upsidedown? what if they were read from the other side, not to obstruct those who watch the picture?


Идёт коза рогатая за малыми козлятами, забодаю-забодаю-забодаю (знаком козы "бодает")
Мишка косолапый по лесу идёт, шишки собирает, песенки поёт,
Ладушки-ладушки, где были - у бабушки, что ели - кашку, что пили - бражку
попили-поели-полетели, на головку сели (делает вид что руки это птички или птичка)
(бражку! такое древнее, что даже незнали что алкоголь детям нельзя? его никому нельзя так-то)
Этнографы полагают, что кашка и бражка в потешке – это поминальная еда, которую относили на могилу умершему родственнику. Бабушка в этом случае могла быть тем самым усопшим предком, к почитанию которого детей приучали с пеленок.
Сейчас поясню. «Кашка» (читай: «кутья») употребляется вместе с «бражкой», как правило, только на одном семейном мероприятии - поминках. Так что ладушки – это, по сути, общение с почившим (шей) (той самой «бабушкой»).
алкоголь это христианская наркотик. это приучение молиться руки совместив, энергентику на саму себя с другой стороны зщаземлив. Ветрувианский человек показывает как надо жить (голым в шаре, с руками и ногами в противоположные стороны (в идеале с восстановленной плацентой, но для начала хоть как-нибудь))
Но обычные русские подобного не знают, не вызывает человече когнитивного диссонанса этот стих лишь когда бабушка его читает, или когда действительно у неё в гостях (сейчас или, ещё лучше, если только-что были)
Обратил внимание, что ИМЛ алфавитно, и что МИЛ будет более приятное прочтение.
И начать с мишки было самое естественно, затем коза (если начать с козы, ребёнок и убежать может, а мишка прикольный, это танец который и ребёнок может исполнить, то всё были три танцевальных движения, Терпсихоровы стихи. Первый стих на ногу, пинаться дети умеют и в утробе, а два последующих на руки: сначала показывает что человек умеет руками вытворять, а затем показывает птичек, которых и ребёнок может изобразить, очень педагогическое. Надо посмотреть, повысится ли интеллект какого-нибудь африканского племени, если им показать эти потешки, чтоб померить у тех, кто согласится снимать то, как детям такое показывают, и затем (лет через десять) измерить интеллект детей и сравнить с общим по племени (и у тех кто согласился снимать тоже, может согласятся лишь наиболее умные, любопытные, интеллектуально смелые, в любом случае, сверить четыре средних iq: родителей, их сверстников, детей, их сверстников (и если интеллект детей будет выше чем у сверстников, то рекомендовать комплекс из этих трёх потешек для повышения интеллекта (русские же не самые тупые? они белые, камон! ну так может и потешки белым интеллектом произведены. Надо найти потешки у других народов, и не нужны никакие эксперименты, раз мета-анализ возможен, начать следует с него)))))
Учат не бояться медведя, но бояться козу, а птичек тоже можно не бояться, даже если на голову сядут.
В козе ещё и ритм ускоряется, вербальные способности демонстрируются, мотивируя развивать.

И если каждой букве соответствует стих, то значение положение стихов имеет значение:
имл гораздо более слабая комбинация, чем мил: мишка и коза пугают, и ребёнок ожидает подобного от третьего стиха, но его в сущности нежно по голове почти погладили.

МИЛ (мишка косолапый, идёт коза рогатая, ладушки-ладушки)
оно же и МКЛ (медведь, коза, ладушки)


азбука раньше называлась абевега (либо, что скорей всего, это креатив Чулкова) abe Vega
 В 1 в. до н. э. Лукреций, используя сравнение атомов с «буквами», впервые передал греч. как elementa, от «эл-эм-эн» — ср. рус. «абевега» и т. д.), а Цицерон первым применил новый термин к «четырём элементам» Эмпедокла.
            Diels H., Elementum, Lpz., 1899; Burkert W., , «Philologus», 1959, Bd 103, ?., 3/4, S. 167— 197 (лит.).
Философский энциклопедический словарь. — М.: Советская энциклопедия. Гл. редакция: Л. Ф. Ильичёв, П. Н. Федосеев, С. М. Ковалёв, В. Г. Панов. 1983.
Чулков интересный тип, сейчас смотрю его "Новое и полное собрание российских песен" и там на А лишь те, что начинаются на Ахъ (только в четвёртом томе одно начинающееся на Ай, ау)


Could prefix ab be both a and b? (Is it cognate to russian об? no)

abd
ab is kinda of, for it is from (f of futhark? same word read differently in diffferent languages? written language, as sign language are not tied up to the spoken language, even though written language follows grammar of the spoken one, technically one is in sound, and the other is in writing, so technically we can translate speech into text, but there's no even firm connection between sounds and letters: г и к могут звучать одинаково, а с может звучать по разному, ugh могут вообще не звучать (про себя сказал ugs (sorta oh) когда это слово произносят? though? thought (thought is literally про себя) and the two words are pronouncing o differently (though sorta reads the u, and thought does not. And I thought of though being like go, and in thought ugh is even more silent))
Though and Thought are so similar, because we say "though" when we had a thought, sorta thought is thoughed. In laugh whole ugh is read as f, so see, sorta different languages spoken and written.
for yes es would suffice, but somebody had that y and that e in suffice (but what if there was no e in es, would s be yes? si? c. is for certainly, cure~sure, совершенно справедливо, согласен,

ab is from, and what a great way to start it.

ab ovo? a bo vo? А Б В?
Good
Efgh  and in the context of ugh, I looked fore words with egh, and there I found only frekay words, such as driegh which is a double of dry. And egh is also silent! And it's a natural thing to say about a well.
And what egh does, it closes the dri syllable, and makes it not drʌɪ, but dri:
ogh isn't silent though, neither is agh, none is the ending, in brogh it's a root or something, like in ring is ing ending? well, duh. well, whatever, brogh is broch (generally ring, whether of stone as a foundation of a castle, or in the sky around the moon to be an omen of bad weather, but that moon broch is not told to be spelled as brogh, that gh is scottish, I guess, because they say those are in Scotland)

in Eight gh is silent. what is gh? ugh and egh (ух и эх)
one two three four five six   seven eight nine ten eleven twelve
wʌn tu    θri     fo   fʌɪv siks seven  eɪt    nʌɪn ten eleven twelv
seven, ten and eleven follow the speech exactly, others - not so much

See how different the writing from the reading: ʌɪv ~ I've (both have v, but what are the vowels?)

though = хотя,  does it mean that thought grows out of wishing? It makes great sense, actually.




vamos [вэ́мос] пойдём (выход-смещение, выметайся, mos is definitely as motion, neh? nah, is't its it's of va, go, and mos is мы, nos)
(one of the tasks of this journal is to demonstrate how the learning is done. But what's the use of it, if I also do not log all the input data? but then nos and мы were placed into my head centuries decades ago, so I only somewhat log the new data, and as for old knowledge, I guess you have to trust me, yet everybody has false knowledge from time to time, so take only what makes sense, and test even that part.
So here I just compared, and м is пойдём is grammatically reflecting the m in vamos.



love before money, brains before force (speaking of ♠️ ♣️ ♥️ ♦️ the ♠️ ♣️ ♥️ ♦️ ♤ ♧ ♡ ♢ being 40 60 100 and 80, I wonder who placed them this way to the unicode, probably somebody understood that love comes before money. Also and maybe that was done so that ctrl shift u2666 is not love, but money
u1666: ᙦ (carrier Cha)
u666: ٦ (The Eastern Arabic numeral representing the number six)
so, surprisingly ٦٦٦ is not 777, but 666
٧٧٧ is 777
٨٨٨ is 888 and that may tell, that russians used to use arabic letters, for in their language seven is semm, and eight is vosemm (but then they would use ᚢ instead of V, duh, complicated)



исповедую (кого-то, как на исповеди) и исповедаю (сам, как веру)
у как U и а как аз (от а до я? a to z? ams and russian alphabet tells that it's likely to be a to s)


отъебись ~ отцепись
отце пись

ебать ~ цепать? ~ цеплять! ~ ципать ~ щипать? Эй, девчонка, пора отдохнуть, настало время тебя за клитор ущипнуть (но в целом синоним вообще не полный, ассоциативно-то можно что угодно притащитьт. )

И поскольку том начинает лагать, и только что там ٦٦٦ упомянали, по доброй традиции имеет смысл завершить здесь, переходим в том 39