It is volume 8 ( 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ) this is a draft part, it may seem that I stumble around some random rhymes, but that's how I always was working and some cool stuff came out of it, so the most solid info is the first half of the first volume, all the rest is raw as odb loved it or more. several cool notes appeared afterwards, so I keep it online just in case and because ever wanted to read drafts of scientists.

Note Knowed Knot

I'm going to spiral around these topics until I arrive to my destination or wherever it leads me.

  I used to think that 88 is a jewish psy-op (because gematria is their trickery) but now I know that gematria is borrowed from isopsephy, and it's also H(eil) H(itler) in Greek (they count F if for the numerals, picrelated) but then they'd use χχ instead
 Which doesn't completely negate the possibility of it being a psy-op, because they push socialism (because they can corrupt the state, not the private interests) and because they slaughtered millions of whites and not the jews.

  > If you're obsessing over whether a number is a psyop you may want to turn of the laptop for a bit and go outside. It's just a meme, like everything else on this gay planet.

  I actually think (since yesterday when I found this image) that those digits conceal something bigger. Like some knot-writings or something.

The ring on the central part makes me think that the ring around which the central ∞
(ထ is some phonetic sign from a south eastern writing system I didn't get to yet)
8∞8 could also stand for three aettir. and thus the central aettir has two signs as the centre.

If that central ∞ with the ring refers to the ring in the middle of the axe, then left and right 8's are Wo&Shem, восемь родственно семи, и т.о. семье.
Mama & Papa as details are often named today. Mom with a hole and Dad with a stick. or even pick.
It first came to me because of how those 8's reflect each-other similar to swasticas are right and left sometimes attributed to male and female counterparts. And the ring only supported it. Now I wonder if the figure below the ring is a phallos and the lips (but no tongue) above it stands for the female. Or that lips are there from the start and face was only drawn to hide the true meaning of it. or is it the face of the same person to whom the phallos belongs. and then those 8's only stand for left and right. Still a mistery to me. I will return to this subject later.

8∞8 could also stand for three aettir. and thus the central aettir has two signs as the centre.
Let's see:

Most of the sources there are tell of such order, where ᛃᛇ are the central letters. Is it because of Jah somehow? But there are other orders too:
for whatever reason this one was unavailable in a larger scale, but looking for one I found the next one,

which makes a clearer centre, the one I probably expected deep inside: ᚾᛁᛅ nia. or eia? or nie? I noticed before that runes are often mistransliterated, but I still can trust the graphic representations, and ᚾᛁᛅ is quite a representation.
It's also good to know that ᛋ and ᛲ are the same.
I also remember of the following canon:

and it's interesting that ᛋᛲ in the form of ᛌ changes the aet there. Or rather it changed it later, because that accound from Bureus is the most ancient we know of. And others are all new, they all shifted ᛌ from the thir aet to the second one (probably to make them 8-mal instead of not only 6-mal, but actually 5-mal (probably those dice had an empty slot each, for gods are allowed to remain silent) whether because 15 was considered devilish not less that 666 of 18 were.
Maybe those dice were rigged excentric that empty dice side was more likely to fall and only "god's will" would deliver some other side to be on the top.
And while I looked for these runesets, I also found something weirder:

Uthark theory

In the occult study of the esoteric meaning of runes, the Uthark theory originated in the 1930s with the work of philologist Sigurd Agrell (1881–1937), a professor at Lund University, Sweden.

He theorised that the rune row is a cipher, and that one can understand its meaning by placing the first rune, "F", last, resulting in an ”Uthark” instead of the traditional "Futhark" order.[1] He articulated the bulk of his theory in his 1932 book Die spätantike Alphabet-Mystik und die Runenreihe [The Alphabet-mysticism of late antiquity and the sequence of the runes].

The suggestion has not been accepted in mainstream runic studies, due to lack of historical sources, but has found proponents in occult circles and in popular culture.

Kenneth Meadows promoted the Uthark theory in his 1995 book Rune Power. Thomas Karlsson, founder of the magical Order Dragon Rouge and Therion lyricist, then published the first monograph dedicated to the subject after Agrell's work of 1932: Uthark: Nightside of the Runes[2] in 2002.

Uthark at Swipnet. Accessed September 22, 2012.
Karlsson, Thomas (2001-08-01). Uthark: Nightside of the Runes. Gazelle Distribution Trade. p. 150. ISBN 978-91-974102-1-2.

It kind of relates to bd being the first letters, and a being a later addition, but that addition was really early, so that all the alphabet has it. Or is it just missionary reform of global scale? This is much less likely. Or was it useful unification of vowel and consonantal scales (still separated in devanagari, maybe because it was syllabaries before alphabets. Was Ogham also syllabary?)
but the centre of the second aet doesn't show anything spectacular, and that's the context we found it in.

llamo (llamó) is spanish for Name and I am. (it sounds [jamo] and [ja] is я is I in russian and yo[jo] in spanish. soy and estoy are am, ser and estar are to be. thus est is s, which makes sense: 's. it also relates to a pending question of ᛌ standing for s the same way י stands for i, and both are plural suffixes in different languages, and who knows who used which writing system at first.)
ll is [j]
J is [h]
H is nothing at all.

in Spannish.

is it why it's whether И or Nn or h?
h is none, and it's all three forms? is it spirit? ה is told to be spirit, ח is told to be..
and I went to look for it, and I found that it's not spirit, but breath, but I unite these two meanings in one, as window is the opening for the spirit, for the breath (breath and spirit could be of that s- hypothesis)

It looks to me like ox-worshippers placed the ox at the top. is their god an ox? is it another bull? a free bull? another god, not much different from the previous one? or is this alphabet was invented by ox-worshippers in whole? but ox before house looks weird. D also stands for door is english and russian, but in russian D also stands for dome (home) is it why they're together as BD the first lexics about buildings, not natural things? because the alphabet is artificial too. others can be named by imitation, more abstract things need more abstract signs. Окно и первая гласная: ה and window in russian english could be a case for vav, and in russian wind is ветер, is v voda, not vetet, veter is dashed Δ, but in hebrew waw is hook, and zain is sword, s is there in old russian alphabet, H fence, wall, the opposite of window. closed window.
𐤈 for wheel is fascinating. neither russian nor english have letters for wheel around. wheel and koleso, well kolodets, wall kol? kolyami steny delali.

That wheel is the last letter related for dwelling, as if jews began wandering at this level.
The next letter, י is the firs relating to body parts, which go till the very end of it:
The next is kaph, כ, the arm
(which has no relation neither to english hand/arm nor to russian рука/рука (кисть is used for hand sometimes, but it stands for brush actually)
The next letter is from the zoo, which goes through all the alphabet, and I think that it's added later, that also explains samekh after nun: they had two words for fish (for river fish and sea fish maybe) and it gave birth to this chapter, that letters can follow the same meaning: bet & dom unite b & d, which explains that they look the same way in roman cursive.
BD EV ηθ are the house dice? ce = es, plural suffix as in -re = -er and -el = -le.
only the BD doesn't follow the vowel-labial pattern, and is it why A reminds Д so much? DB is AB?
the actual order is 1 2, even if 2 was the first number invented? too. to. to+во?
do linguals come from vowels? the name "vowels" say that they come from labial sounds like waw!
labial is water, we all came from water, U comes from V? O comes from V. is a a half of O? the D?
In old turkic runes 𐰖‎ & 𐰗 are variants of the same sing sign [j] (whether it relates to jah or not, I don't know)
‎𐰶‎ and 𐰷 are other letter there [q] (orkhon distinguish them as right and left, ‎yenisey as full and half)
(I'm so high and I need to go, I should seclude in my келья с интернетом. строю, строю, строю!)
I didn't need to go, I could have excused myself, but this element of discipline have thanked me with a good buy, four book of Tesla (diaries, patents, lectures and articles) for $50 which is a week salary in russia, btw. Ithink I'm fukcing rich, wasting money like this. Well, maybe $100 is the average week salary, either way I spend more than I earn yet. As if prodigious relates to prodigal.

I was going to speak of p standing for mouth in hebrew and р значит рот в русском,
that vowel O for eye is corresponding to russian Око (Очи is the pluralform, Ok is oog, eye, ч is just a palatalized form of k)
and of ת being a common denominator (they're all marks (I wonder if taw is realted to tavro)) and thus ש being the final meaningful letter, and t could be caused (cast) by english tooth (or some related word like tand) and russian tooth is zub, where z is also final and not far from ש.

Tsade is also out of that triple set of house-cattle-bodyparts. and it's not present in greek or lating.

I wanted to ignore the samekh-fish, because of nun-fish, but probably nun is stan ska snake (in other conext I would consider samekh the snake because of it S-likeness of slang, snake, змей. But here I see that the only way to have a complete die of animals is to include both:
house:  1house 2door 3window 4hook 5wall 6wheel (probably wheel was added after 5 was enough)
animal: 1ox 2camel 3ox-goad 4fish/snake 5fish 6monkey
bodyparts: 1hand 2palm 3eye 4mouth 5head 6tooth
I thought it were arm and hand, but those tables tell otherwise, though they probably parrot each-other.
extra four: weapon/sword/prick  water  fishhook/hunt  mark

They say that in china how are you is "did you eat" but then english how are you could be "хаваю" which would be not a question but an offer.

I'm open like Slut's Slit both are cognates and according to s- hypothesis relate to let, slut lets.
Search could be a cognate of seek in teh sense that both are cognates of искать ищи
Is the cognate of russian тех?
(not only because it's a popular typo, but also because it can be translated like that)

some political text I wrote as a letter no an american, to start a day.
(there's something relatng language, an editor should check it, or you may, it can be fun in some other ways)

I was thinking whether I should have sent that message at all, and at the moment I finally sent it (after I woke up, I sleep at day) I (thinking of 4chan phenomenon) realized that right-wingers are everybody who's not left, thus it's a slur commies call the opposition. And it's a weird thing: left is for left alone, while right is "right and law"
They inverted the meaning: most "commies" follow "the left" because liberals stand for liberty. by the name, people don't look into details, they follow the banner. But that's a trick and those "most of the commies" are useful idiots (there's the only way tiny minority of population can subjugate the other 98%: it's by connivance of the mass. (that word connivance I didn't know, I wanted to use compliacy which is compliance, and I almost mistaked (mistook doesn't feel right in the context) it for complicacy. In russian revolution they promised to give free everything to everybody: earth to villagers, factories to workers, but what they delevered were villagers were "fed" to the earth. and workers were fed to the factories (it wasn't your property, you were a property of it, it was illegal not to have a job for more than three months or something)So now I know (or suspect) I walk on the very thin line, because what I can say further may even lead to prosecution in some countries (and how can I know what are the differences in all of them: I have some guesses: chinese probably doesn't like "antisoviet propaganda"  (I use "chinese" but mean "china" (it's not people, it's the state) and muslims probably butthurt of religious discussions (there's a rule of etiquette: politics and religions are unfit topics for small talk. Is it not to offend neither muzos nor the jews. As one writer said, whites don't really know what humiliation is. (it was a picture about how whitey will never understand why he cannot say nigger, some smart state propaganda of control over speech to control the behavior of the populace, some egg-head pseud-scientist (humanist, humanitiest) influenced govevernments,
I lose interest to politics and wanna go ponder on language.

If you were my editor, it would be your duty now to censor me, so maybe twitter and others feel like they're to be in say what their media wants to publish. And that is a good thing. Donald should have started something bigger (and I want to help him build it) which is his own site. That site would be able to connect to sites of other people, who would connect to him directly (the cabinet of ministers to begin with, Kanye West, I would attach an addon or what is the term to my own site, you would finally make your own site (I speak about it further) and we would need twitter and facebook only as some randomizer the actual newspapers are.
Here I was referring to something few lines above, about you being my editor: So today we have some other roles (we are penpals) And if you feel it's all good for your public, you may forward any message from me without asking (only unless you publish it edited not in private but in who knows maybe you will technically be my editor some day, we share the passion to writing, but I think you cannel it not where you should. Don't make your stories perfect, spread them in journals. Or if you don't publish because you know you will not be able to change the text after all, spread it the way I spread on your own site, where everybody can access (and publishers too) and where you edit your own works real time, without the intermediary of mediocrities, while they also wanna eat, and that's why it's them built the system, not only by taking the alpha side to keep omegas in check not to be omegas themselves, not only by following the status quo not to break the law no matter how unjust (what do they know, that's why people go blindly after slogans in politics not looking even at the history of the teaching and actual players behind that.

Back to the editor thing: I would like not to be censored at all, or only if somebody would take labour of checking for misleading and difficult to understand typos, but left the way I place sentences the way I intended. And if that's a typo, it's a good one. And if somebody recognized the scans of my notebooks into texts and diagrams.
I am doing a good thing mby using those bad words: it's normalization. of faggotry (in both meanings: all of us should know what medical conditions does homosexuality causes (fecal flora and broken asshole) and what medical conditions do cause the homosexuality (I think it's epigenomic, because I heard or hread it, and I after that I felt something of this kind when I listened to scissorSSisters. I want SS back because I normalize even nazis: as an ultraliberal I was apallled that some side isn't allowed the freedom of speech. So I dwelved into it and now I know what commonner is not allowed to know:
I looked beyond the political curtain. And by doing so I found the peaceful solution: as I said to some nazis and to some leftists when I said that I'm a nazi (jokingly or not, I technically am now) when I said there's a plot-twist: you cannot blame people for neither genes nor culture. And even if some of their genes (if we have augmented neocortex, we have knowledge of these obscure so far facts) make them molest children, which is even in their books (who knows what trash is in my books sometimes) which traumatizes even the genome, the way I probably felt (or imagined) whn I listened SS and the Tyler too (then I felt becoming black)

If you have something missing in your work and that's why you don't start your successful writer career, you may show me something short of yours, and I will probably offer an idea or two. plot-twist or some mild corrections of who knows what come to my mind.

and the next letter:
That previous message's first part is full of loose ends:Right and Low is the opposites. Low is Left for being Lies. but some lows are the foundations of society. how's that?some laws and lows to other nations: cutting hands for stealings seem barbaric custom of some greedy evil apes. We see them others apes, they're not humans enough to us, that's why many nations in their own languages simply call themselves people (considering others beasts) so I read, but russians don't mean people, it probably means villagers, but that's my etymology, most of us have no idea what is the other meaning of that word, they can only guess: dew's? spread? spread is good, and unlike citizens, villagers are spread over larger territory. And dew is also spread as if by sprayer.
It could also stand for the names: Rustam, Ruslan, these are more tatar or bashkir names, tartaria is the meme which start to spread across russian federation, russians consider tartaria the previous reincarnation of russia, maybe because it's the next centre of power and that's the theoretic preparation for it, or it is just a point of view of some scientists who actually discovered the kingdoms which existed here before russia. But they still see it blurry: they unite Parma with some artefacts of Russian Kingdom (not they, he, the one I watched) so, the names, Rus is a short form of Rustam, Ruslam, and probably some others, just as Dan and Frantz and German are all names, and Sven, so this tradition could actually unite our nations culturally on some that deep level.
further go some linguistic text, you may skip it (and that tendency, to dig into language is another issue which makes it uncomfortable for me to send these letters more publically than to a guy with iq high enough to understand.
And other tribes have their own traditions, which may not feel right to us, maybe that's why christian codex was called not "the rights" but "the lows" (rights and obligations are these antonyms, what you may and what you  many not do. thus Rights are the boundaries over the Laws)
R and L in the alphabet are not only Right and Left, but also Right and Low. and the low and law are also cognates in this context: law is what considered to be too low to do. And right is right on, straight ahead. And identity of right and straight allows me to hypothesize that rst in the alphabet is a claster, where R is dotted þ which is both D for daddy & P for papa (it's not for sure, it's raw, it's the long-bothering question I have just attempted to answer right now when I noticed that P and R also must share this claster, but runic form of PRSTV is ᚱᛦ(if R, or ᛣ if Q)ᛋᛏᚢand that V could be a form of R, ah, it's complicated, my readers will see the point (and I will copy these two letters in my book in tiny font, or these places I will make big again. ᚱ is traditionallly recognized as R, but my retransliteration of runes say it's labial, and Р is R in russian and greek. and the final ᚢ looks even more like П (which is the P in russian and greek, and in some artefacts ᚱ looks even more like ᚢ, but it's still not a slim theory, I'm still only digging into that, it's so raw it would  never be published by conventional editor, and who knows how many good raw scientific work is lost in the achive vaults or even more of it is destroyed. If we could fed such thoughts and guesses to ai's where they would flow forever like memories others can see or ai itself can integrate them somewhere she thought.Okay, bye. I hope you enjoy it.

and the other one:
I know three is the charm, so I write again to tell that the previous mesage has an inconsistency: it starts speaking about something from one perspective, but then I jump to another perspective where it has it's own and different meaning. Laws in bible are not only presented as what you shouldn't do, but also what you must do (not allowed, must, what was laid on our shoulders, so that's a complex word, with some complex semantics and if we unite both the spellings, the meaning is even larer, and probably the spelling was divertified.. diversified (I think I need an editor) because not everybody looked at it as at something unwanted, at another element of terror from the oppressors, but propagated as HIGH duty. I guess A is higher than o (it's also raw, but funny nevertheless)
About editors, there's a movie which me and my brother looked at differently: Genius. My brother saw a story of a good editor, who helped a genius writer to publish his work, (and probably thus movie is about the editor, and thus he's the genius, I don't know my brother's opinion on this line in the brackets) where I saw a story of a good writer (the editor enjoyed reading his work, which doesn't happen often to him it so I saw) who was tortured by the editor till his brains boiled. And the editor is probably not a bad guy either, but that movie is not a success story, but ultimately a tragedy.
If our story is tragedy of comedy or something even better, is yet to be seen. I wonder why you don't help me with my project, maybe because you're a glowie, it would make a good company to a mason and a jew. See why I cannot write publically whatever I want, your friends are sensitive to some topics, you're a good friend to carry of their feelings, I don't. Because I believe that taboos are whether ways to manipulate society or source of neurosis, or both. Though to manipulators I want to offer some much better solutions to meet their needs and aspirations and to nervous people I can offer the cure (not me personally, the civilization, the way things are going, I just show that genetic therapies and augmented neocortex are coming. And I am working on the shell for that super being, and I wonder why I have to force the environment to move that way with me, not for me. I was warned that there's a tragic component of any inventor: he revealed that new thing nobody know of, and the first to oppose him will be the most close to him, his family, because they didn't get that revelation, they don't see what he sees, and thus here's another one: the thing with smart people is they look like crazy people to dumb people.
If there are other inconsistencies or loose ends, please let me know of those you care about.

so about that P being a form of R (or R the form of P) and ST being a sequence of R (I think that weird thing I didn't mention, that ST are how lingual R starts, just because right and straight could be cognates? isn't it too much of a stretch? But the main stretch (or a weird piece) is the P and R being the "cognates"

That what is what in the o-line is a tricky one, but if P and R are cognates, and so are S and T. What it leaves at the other side? O & Q? Was it OPQ? Isn't Q a some form of O? Just like R is the same form of P as I noticed OP and QR repeating one another? But it's more likely that ST have nothing to do with R.
more like with Q. Are S and T from Q or even directly from O? This guessing doesn't make much sense, even though σ reminds o a lot, but so does ρ. And in the light of П & T sharing the same line, and q being so close to g, it links q to o once again, as it is the third in the П & T play. And because T is sometimes not of 1 column but 3, Q could stand for both 1 and 0. 1 the ᛐ then 2 is ᚢ or ᚱ and ᛐ ᚢ makes more sense as 1 2. but then where's 0? was there 0? O would make a perfect zero, and what a coincidence that it's in this line. and the way it goes: ᚮᚱᛦ.. well now it's 023, even then I take the freedom to equal ᛦ to ᛏ, even though ᛦ looks like a perfect 3. but it's all way too far-fetched.
𐰯 is p in old-turkic, which can have or have not anything in common with what I'm speaking of if I'm speaking of something in particular at all. This extended research is layed out here so something unhuman may make sense of it even if I don't deliver what I aim at (though I think I will, but something unhuman may make some other senses, the ones I didn't notice or didn't have enough time to get to)
I'll leave it here, and it's so raw it's to be grey (sery syroy, as I used to say) bu t  I'll leave it like this. Let it shine, maybe it will shine through to me.

I was told that german and russian are the only languages having something like Schadenfreude, and today I learn that gloat is the word. (Billions 3.8)
gloat as a word could be also related to goat in some way.

gubernatorial is another cool word from the next episode, because governor is gubernator in russian, I never knew why.

fore hand standing for правая рука (буквально передняя рука) makes пр in право and пер in перед cognates again. and forward being cognate to right (right as in keep on) makes fo some useless prefix, I wonder what it could be. just like п in право doesn't appear in right.

PRST is просто or prost?
P~R and prosto is right and pravo is right and then again straight is also right
Re is Pere but I also see something else re:
-er and -est (that is the difference between PR and ST
Something makes me believe English (and Russian?) can be the keys to the understanding of the alphabet? English is the knot of all the european languages: it took from french, it too from latin, but also from celtic and germans, whichever nation originated alphabet, somebody in GB knows what or knew what it was all about.

lamb lams
lambs lam

chit chat is literally small talk.

new session.
Goal: to find the most simple words (the most phonetically simple words world-wide)
Suddenly, when I placed this goal on paper, I broke it down so I immediately understood how to reach it:
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z and maybe few more are the simplest words. Now I must go google's translator and I go through every letter in every language they have there. And I make the map of how those meanings overlap, I believe they're like some organism growing over some territory, a memetic, not genetic organism. memes are the other genes, and I didn't read Dokins, I like to figure it all by myself.
second level of simplicity is two-letter words, or maybe all consonants are bilitteral. be, co? co is not a word, but a prefix Does it make it older or newer? and these two things are different from different perspective.
do ef for of are if and of both ef? EF or Ef For from is the third level word, frm. Is it? Isn't it something further after the actual three letter words? for is the third level word, from is the fourth, it's some m added to for. for me? m is me, who else. im? impossible? that's i, it takes whatever form it wants.  That line starts with i- and ends with -n as in no.  new is probably new-del, where del is a verbal suffix. си-дел ис жаст дид aSs.(thow legs, two poluzhopia) if s is ass, v is eyes, and thus y is v.
ч ин очи ис зэт ч г ин глаза? ит ууд би уиэрд,

What are the simples words in russian and int english.
a be see do if (for could be if or of with some r. if'r?) go high I you k all am me no on (new is the second level) oh up que are as is tu po qemu are (is) tu
if p is ᚹ is w (ᛩ is q. isn't it lovely) then it's who(ho is q, but greek and russian omit it. and I think of чё instead of что, and I see the t in the end, as if that eloquent of que are (is) thou, a simple w? or at least о чём тыю oqt, why q turnt p? why would it turn Rр? graphically maybe only because of squash. swash.
phonetically? q and R are closer than any of those to p. but it could be just dialectal variant, could something shorter than pochemu appear before me for questioning, or am I only tripping, weaving some burime?
a be (a doesn't make sense. should it have? does russian azbuka make sense? some claim it does, but I noticed they also lie.)
a be.. c doesn't have simple word, see is of s. as or so is of ass, c is literally see or sea. be at sea makes much more sense.
be at sea. basS (yep, and see)
be and see
sea and back
be back.
be ok.
be see do (do is a common verb, a further abstraction, abc is the beginning of the alphabet, ᚦ thus a staved form of c, not d, not D.
ef gh if go? h is i ef gi? θ could be th. goth for goes. goth goes? goth is just a popular word in old script researcher mistook for a nation? where are goths? who are goths? I don't know their history, they probably were assimilated by larger communities, the way colmyks and chuvashs are often considered to be russians, probably some people consider themselves descendants of goths, but I am a soviet citizen, we found it more convenient not to know for sure who our ancestors we didn't see were.
if go
i je ik el me nous
of que ares tu 2 1 2 1 of q rs t
it is far-fetched? I don't know, it's raw, fresh.
if i-line is all about first pronoun (or is l not first? l looks exactly like l, but is it originally r? is r el as t tu? as que also third person to chto eto tы.
s could be sie, thee. thus ᚦ is c again.
so is only i-line such first pronoun? it has the third pronoun in l.
abc is the pattern for all the lines. c is thee, be is вы, a is some... a is third person, thee is second. b can't be вы, becaus russian is not english, v is we in english. b is v, I hope you know what it means (in russian, historically, b is в in russian [v]
В is literally V in russian.
A isn't a pronoun, it's an article. Does it tell that it's later? Not yet, that it's different from the others, all the i-line are pronounds, o line is half pronoun. r is are, a verb, o is of, prefix, p is whether russian по (by) or I dunno, pay, пей? we'll dismember russian alphabet later.


а бвы где ж
и к л? мне (л is lo as n is ne? не желаете ли ко мне?)
о по рсту

russian does make sense, what a surprise.

(actually it's  ёж, and that Ё is tried to be taken out of the alphabet, probably because it's taboued, ё-word is f-word. f is also excluded. in greek. and in russian too. and ж stands where g stand from the beginning and where H (х) stand from the end. so both ж, g, х, н,h,thus,too.

aback do ef go hi (it does seem english is more sown in single letters, while russian is more flexic, uniting many words in one more but the way they speak is they cut the speech while english speech flows like river речка речь I wonder if it's an overcompensation or a reverse coincidence, coincidental reverse.

abc is aback? does it command as us to read it from the other side? zyx? wvu tsr qpo (p is ᚹ again. П is ᚢ, ᚢ and ᚹ are cognates thus. cognates is a better word than invariants. why invariants? why not variants? I think I repeat someone else's terminology, I coin my own now.)

nml (normally? normal?) kji hgf edc ba? nah, no sense at all. But why don't I break it into one-letter words? I still didn't make what I was going to? I made an approach, I didn't make it globally. I think english and russian enough, but they tell different stories: russian is two or three questions (ъыьэюя is probably a later addition, so unique they are .but ъыь repeat uvw can they be cognates somehow? How would english words read if uvw were ъыь or rather how would russian word be read if ъыь were uvw? poduezd. подле въезда? it's not ezd, it's indeed vuezd. obuyavlenie? I think I would even accept such orthography. So I'm taking russian into latin script. Just because of the k-column alone, just because it's such more awesome than awkward russian one. It could be good in text, but it's not good as an abecedary, maybe only to study it in historic perspective.
but this attempt break at ы: syr is not v unless y is v, which I think I said earlier it is.
in this context we said it:
do ef for of are if and of both ef? EF or Ef For from is the third level word, frm. Is it? Isn't it something further after the actual three letter words? for is the third level word, from is the fourth, it's some m added to for. for me? m is me, who else. im? impossible? that's i, it takes whatever form it wants.  That line starts with i- and ends with -n as in no.  new is probably new-del, where del is a verbal suffix. си-дел ис жаст дид aSs.(thow legs, two poluzhopia) if s is ass, v is eyes,
and thus y is v.
ч ин очи ис зэт ч г ин глаза? ит ууд би уиэрд,

I'm not going to compare these y & v's now, I leave it for later, I go on looking for the short words to see if some of russian and english shorties correlate.

a be see do if of go hi I all am me no on pay/buy are as is thou you we why
a бы в вы да де её же ж за из к мы мой на не он от по с ты те та то
(notice за из and no on)
нет is не то. thus t is to.

имена собственные совпадут: Ра и Rah. and that is it, the only short god's name I know. Io is another one. doesn' t it tell that o is of i's (hebrew o looks like l. is L also in this Lio? Leo? Long red hair? but that leo is male. and a is of R.

т is the most popular word in short words, and thou and the correlate ты и те. thus те = то = та and тот correlates that. but russian don't seem to have traces of this. or is s and t stand together because it's the same s and t as in this and that? That seems to be more based, because it's t in russian тот.

and this and that were previously recognized as се и те, сё и то.

are there any other correlations between english and russian?
вы you
мы me
russian is more plural, english is more individual.
thus ты could be те (thee) before they invented ы. but that's only a speculation.
if мы is me, ты is the? is these plural form of that word? was it thees before? was it trees? trees are somebody beyond them (probably people didn't communicate with foreigners with somebody behind the trees having a cause to rob, the casus belli, that the foreigners should have attacked their man first.

в in (not direct cognates, but meet twice: в is v is u is и is i  and  n ν v в
thus does the meaning of в go to n or i? or both? И = N? и = 'n'
И N is that very line of I & Je & ik & me & nous (so L is out of this raw the way it is in ugaritic. I have a conersation about ugaritic right now:

I noticed that ugaritic canon is different not between the only actual abecedaric artefact I know of (even if this one is a replica, the dirtier one looks the same) and the academic table.
I knew it for some time, it's obvious. But I write to you to ask what it means if you know.
And just tonight have I found that ugaritic unicode is different in the framed section, and sometimes N𐎐 looks like the letter before it 𐎏 (which is a bug, because wiki somehow shows N correctly, like the third of the sequence of 𐎚 and 𐎀 using the same unicode, but recognizing it with some different software: if 𐎏 𐎐 look the same to you, google them, one of them is actually n. Ugaritic is also the only alphabet where something stands between M & N I know of, wonder what's the reason, maybe because that letter is the central one, concept of the central letter mattered in the past)
My research is rather out of this world, so if you (or whoever can answer) don't want to be mentioned in it, I will keep it anonymous. Thank you in advance.

> Hello, Dmitrij.  Pardon the delay, but it's not clear what question you're trying to formulate.  By "Ugaritic canon" I assume you mean the Ugaritic cuneiform alphabet (what significance you attribute to its unicode representation is impossible to guess).  The order scribes of Ugarit established for their version of the alphabet corresponds in most particulars to what became the standard order, not only for other West Semitic versions of the alphabet, but for the Greek, Etruscan, and Latin alphabets descended therefrom.  The scribes of Ugarit added signs for certain phonemes which did not exist in all Semitic languages, including that which appears between M and N.  There is no special significance to this.

> Of course there are plenty of reliable scholarly works available for learning about the Ugaritic language, the alphabet developed to write it, and the place of that alphabet in the development of the Semitic alphabet generally.

>> I've attached two abecedaria and framed in the black and white picture the three letters not present in the actual artefact. I wonder from where do they originate.
Thank you. I hope it is an interesting question.

>>> The letters are all there, just not where you're looking.  You need to find photographs or  a facsimile showing the tablet's right edge.  As you can see, a cuneiform tablet is not flat like a piece of paper, but three-dimensional; one must be able to turn it around to see all sides.

>>>> Have you personally seen those other sides? Do you have any image or a video of tha tablet being turned around? All I can find is different pictures of it, all up front, with lots of place in front, so why would theywant to place them around (on those pictures nothing tells that someting goes around the plate.
The abecedary from up front lays into the arrangement other alphabets lay in (and others are explained, like armenian is explained using actual historic documents (the students of the guy who allegedly created that writing system left memoirs, showing that the script existed before that and Mashtots only added several letters to the previous order which went in greek order (and you can compare one abecedary to the other, and thus find the letters added without understanding of the repeating abcd order)

>>>>> I've seen thousands of cuneiform tablets -- that's part of my qualification for explaining to you how they're inscribed.  But you can also learn this information and more from a lot of basic books on the subject.  Please do your own homework now.

>>>>>> I think only few of those tablets were abecedaries (other texts don't reveal the alphabetic order accepted by their tradition) so if you find the actual artefact revealing alphabetic order of ugaritic script, please send it my way.

That correspondant of mine, whose name I keep in secret until she delivers, unless she asks me not to reveal it, have already taught me (she didn't teach me much new, I heard it before, but once again she spoke of Akhenaton (1353–1336 or 1351–1334 BC) as an inventor of the monotheism. He looks as if he could be of jewish teip, and then estimations of Jerome (1592) or James Ussher (1571) as estimations of the birth of Moses were correct. But if Akhenaton was indeed the inventor of monotheism and Moses simply got under the influence, then Rabbinical Judaism calculated a lifespan of Moses corresponding to 1391–1271 BCE makes more sense. Scholarly consensus sees Moses as a legendary figure, while retaining the possibility that a Moses-like figure existed.

And then she sais that that god was the sun, which immediately relates of my recent revelation that both japan and china have sun at their flags. and so did nazi germany, swastika is the sun. and because there are two directions for swastika, the nazi swastika is probably the black sun, the eclipse, the moon. Is it why hitler sympathised islam? Is it why merkel tried to impose it on germany? Who are those people? some lunar cult?
Either way, another interesting thing she said (which is a common knowledge, but that's what professors are allowed to pronounce publically) is that old sun-deity amun was replaced by the new one, aton, and it could relate to the way russians write t: т

Nefertiti probably was the wife of Akhenaton, or his predecessor, the mother? and the fact we know of her so much may make her one of the key figures in that cult of aton. Is it cult of atom? if sun is a nuclear reactor

their city was Akhetaten, which in comparison to Akhenaten (the other reading of Akhenaton) is obviously related to it, and that t could stand for the same t Egypt ends with, the denominative of a toponim. T as in topos. N as in nomos, name. So Akhe is the name for both.

Meritaten was probably the daughter of Akhenaten, which could make t female suffix, leaving n male one as -ot and -im are in hebrew.

Tutankhamon was born as Tutankhaton, and probably was the grandson of Akhenaten. He put the end to the Aton cult. (source)

T.о. бутусов's song is not about tutankhamon, but tahenaton, whic I can say by the line "truth is always one" (I'm not a fan. I used to be, but it's kormiltsev's period I cherished)

I watch billions and I stop smoking weed. I just commanded my self stop smoking weed, robots will understand the alphabet, and will never teach that mk
(it's just a guess about the alphabet betin a hteologyic mind-control. So the more a man knew gods, they more

161 is my highest iq score I hit. 145 is the lowest (which is that normal 20-points drift)
thus I take 153 as the average, also because I don't like 6 for in the company of two 1's it looks especially like shit, and six, sechs, sept is seven p is v, n is t, labial and lingual, fresh cut.

and now I see it as lol. Ы

You will see if I stopped smoking it: if this volume is not the last one as 2022 hits, I didn't.

The End.

I wish? No. It goes on.

As like the other Indian rupee banknotes, the ₹100 banknote has its amount written in 17 languages. On the obverse, the denomination is written in English and Hindi. On the reverse is a language panel which displays the denomination of the note in 15 of the 22 official languages of India. The languages are displayed in alphabetical order. Languages included on the panel are Assamese, Bengali, Gujarati, Kannada, Kashmiri, Konkani, Malayalam, Marathi, Nepali, Odia, Punjabi, Sanskrit, Tamil, Telugu and Urdu.

I wonder what the other symbols are and why do they have celtic knot in the angles.. doesn't explain it, but I notice that knot is a part of banknote.

Rupee uses staveless R for their sybol: ₹ and indian 1 reminds it: १ (thus you may remember both)

एक one is ek
ए looks exactly like e, and it makes me believe that these writing systems are somehow connected. And the ling between hindi and arabic I have shown on the example of their Om, read from left to write by both alike (if arabs would read ॐ from left to right as ع and م
क is k, and व is v and there's no the h sign in hindi, but how weird would it be, if k was vh, inhaling h, as I thought about it when I learnt it decades ago.

if h reflects d (but I'd say it reflects c) then c is ihaled d? g is k? it doesn't make much sense, just wandering lightnings around the brains.

I should work more with these:
अआइईउऊऋॠऌॡएऐओऔअंअःकखगघङहचछजझञयशटठडढणरषतथधनलसपफबभमव ०१२३४५६७८९

I delegated it to кипучая деятельность of one freak, but I think I'd better do it myself too.

and as it's time of random again,
is full of symbols I don't know of, and it seems to be a thorough work, and it's not some modern freak, it's somebody who made such an effort in 1933, some James Churchward. The further I scroll the more fascinating it seems, so I mirror it.

I dig further into that guess implanted into my by zlax who shown me the guy who said that V used to be 4, not 5. And I dig ruf further and guess that it used to be 3, not only because it's swashed (связаны) три точки, но и потому что it's ; : which is i, when a is .
aa is o or e? I theoresized of it and I think the final waterfalls notebook has it explained well, it also led to i e a o u being the singing order, because the integral wave of such form would sound as лира или кифара.

So I went on, and after V was 3, it was 2, as if I is 1 & V is 2 and X is 4? or also 2? is Y 3?
If Y is V then it's how 2 could be reinterpreted into 3, and further to 4 from X. or maybe not, I guess.

fret and threat are antonyms but somehow they could be the same in the past. related to fear?
dread is another cognate.

. / v x  these are just guesses. But the fact is IVX is all roman numerals the most of us know. I had to learn LCD, the IVX is used much more widely. setting year by roman numbers wasn't known in russia until perestroika when american films flooded the markets.

/ is 2 only if x is 8, that weird theory of some other guy about V being 4 (and X 8) no matter how weird and unscientific that theory may seem, it is confirmed by me noticing that the summ of I V X L C D would be 365 this time. Which is the length of year. Is 666 сумма зверя? Христиане считали зверем правительство, переименовавшее цифры? Теперь сумма зверя была 666, which is meaningful in the sense of 3 dice, and 3 aettir by 6 and the carbon atom is also 666, and beasts are carbon for sure.

1 4 8 32 64 256 are 365
1 5 10 50 100 500 are 666

so if X is 8, each of it's lepels is 2.

etruscan 100 (or 64) has 6 lepels. neither 100 nor 64 breaks into 6 and what would I have to do with the 10 (8) of the X?

And I also told you I don't believe in M. Which sounds almost like a blasphemy for the Mathusalian me.
M is Y? is that word related to Yerusaleim? is Math related to Yeuri? it is to al Hebra.
(I guess they are naturally good with numbers, but maybe they'd feel happier if they were in less abstract things? But they say life is a tragedy for he who live by feelings (and a comedy for he who lives by thought) so what should they focus on? Music.
X is H is ʃ is S and thus following 𐌣 is the ᛏ after ᛋ, the same trick M does now T (for L) played with old italic numerals. 

that other 𐌣 on the right is tse, the letter, a different sign. can be seen if you click this image, cannot be copied here, the same unicode block is 𐌀𐌁𐌂𐌃𐌄𐌅𐌆𐌇𐌈𐌉𐌊𐌋𐌌𐌍𐌎𐌏𐌐𐌑𐌒𐌓𐌔𐌕𐌖𐌗𐌘𐌙𐌚𐌛𐌜𐌝𐌞𐌟
weirdly acts this font when those numerals are attached to the letters; 𐌞𐌟𐌠𐌡𐌢𐌣𐌭𐌮𐌯
Ж (which is not numeral, but also a letter, letter ess) also cannot be copied (it seems there are different standards of unicode (wikipedia page uses one, me and search bar use the other, I know nothing of this))
That thriple 𐌁(be) is Tse. Which is interesting, because a is a half of o, and thus could be half of the 𐌁 and thus we'd have the sequence of a B ц
that <-like letter is letter Ye.
That Ж-like is The final letter of the archaic South Picene alphabet; equivalent to the letter φ of the Greek alphabet; transliterated ⟨ś⟩, ⟨σ⟩, or ⟨k⟩; and bearing the letter name ess. Also used in the classical Etruscan alphabet as a numeral representing 100
I've no idea what that "equivalent of φ" stands for, but it's very convenient that it's s or k, because the letter before it is W, the letter before that is Ii. You should play with that unicode block. Let's play it:


that 𐌗𐌘𐌙𐌚
is a new anomaly, and the reasons of why this abecedary is in this order is to be researched (it could be arbitrary addition of letters by early researchers, but if this order is authentic, it's like i-line and 𐌝 is literally i, probably the y. ywz. interesting. but the anomaly is in another line, the 𐌖-line and 𐌖 is U. but Y stands there in greek, UVWxYz could be also the i-line anomaly, x also cuts the Y off, so was it like.. I'll leave the theorizing for letter.

to arrange that I needed transliterations, so I went and I found lepontic, which fascinated me: It seems that it's the protoalphabet, where AEI are the three vowels predating the consonant set beginning with k as the eastern alphabets and syllabaries do.
And knowing how it is, AEI could be AIU or even IAU
(but I had to trust google more, because some letters, like 𐌜 (che) are not in those tables. And when it's Uu 𐌞, it could be red and vowel, but I bend it to my scheme and call it labial, which it naturally is, so I take this freedom, so proof and disprove can also take place at this margin of probalistic anomalies.)

The laconicity of lepontic fascinates me. But I already said it. The Ζ & θ could be added later: θ doesn't even appear at raetics. Z though confuses my theorizing of the three vowels standing together, but let's not forget, that it's not some artefactual abecedary, but an academic table, we don't know what was the actual order of any of those alphabets, they're arranged along one line, and they could go differently like latin and greek do.

And that's not only lepontic. Other alphabets in that table (except camunic) don't have letters between a and e except c (which is probably j and thus probably i) and because Γ used to look like Λ sometimes, A could be a dotted variant of that c, which would correlate to the i named ai, but not exactly explain.

𐌐𐌓𐌛𐌜 a pr

and I don't know why I google simply in google, I like that company why oh why, love
especially when I remember there is where 𐌛 returns something awesome like this: 𐌛 (mirror)
there they say 𐌙 is kh, but other in the picture above tells it's ph, but that picture also tells that 𐌘 is z, so I don't know who to believe and leave it like those runes that can read one sign differently, so ancient they are, they all could be as different and russian and latin, reading many similar letters differently.

In the fifth waterfall notebook I wrote that bush and kush (cunt) are why b is first consonant in europe and k is the first consonant is asia.
kusch is пиздёнка (a nice little cunt)
kush is bush
tree is elda (ot slova ell)
bush is B, leaves even near earth.
tree is D the R, de-re^vo, Tree. (со стволом)
(see it in details in the fifth waterfall notebook, when I scan it)
kuchi is pussy in english, and it's definitely egymologically connected to that jewish term one way or the other.

is uBer upper?

is up врх

good morning. I will ponder on these combining them in possible gropus groups

а   бв  гд
её      жз
ий к лмн
о пр ст
у ф х цч шщ
ъыь э юя

a b cd
e f g
hij k lmn
o pqr st
uvw xyz
vowels are labials always together? What does it tell ebout linguals?
a is not around lingual (neither is i around labials, if θ doesn't cout count)
so it's 80% again? 1 out of 5 is taken out of the structure. the rationale could be that a wise man will see that THE exception does support the rule (some other rule, not of which this exception is) did they interwoven those rules about letters in the way? or was it a further iterration, further modificanion of the alphabetic story (азбучная истина)
абы вы года её жзи йкл мн оп рстуфхцчшщ
is it why there's some S among i's, to make йкл искали меня ? The истина should be the same across the alphabets, and the difference in languages would then explain the difference in alphabetic canons (I like this word more than canons)

a       b     cd
e       f      g
hijl  m     nk
o      p     qrst
u     vw   xyz


a       b     cd
e       fghijlmn k  ?    no.
o      p     qrst
u     vw   xyz

a b cd (c~b? but b~d in roman cursive. all the letters come from two)
e f  g
h θ ijk
l m n
o p q
r s  t

6 dice?

l & r are vowels, as in devanagari? and srbsk-hrvatski (is it from where we have -sk endings in our toponyms?)

e f  g
h θ ijk
е ё ж
х ѳ з

l m n
o p q
r s  t
ийкл м н
о п
р с т

is  russian completely otmorozhenny and it's meaningless to find meanings in it (though voiced-sonor-voiceless are awesome, yet I'm not sure I was not the one who saw it in the childhood and told that guy from whom I heard it (by accident in lj, I was awed that he's also from che. Call Chelyabinsk simply Che, register it as Che, there will be several che cities, like many villages around chelyabinsk have the same name. Make it that those places are allowing preferences to people from the cities with such name, that when people from one city come to another city, they don't pay some extra? nah, no good. )

that picture is clickable, and where it leads it links further to where the following image goes:

it is damaged in comparison, but contains additional signs, it's probably from some other dialect or language (I inquired them, will report on in ift it further on)
I also found on that side the example of "азбучные истины"
were they lost because they're not very impressive and

Are relent and repent antonyms? what is regent then?

As an the cover of manuscript27 shown, glaza colösa, beröza brother? birch bijork
образ o'brother? of brother?  (по образу и по до бию? подобный преподобный. преподобный богообразен более всего. подобный удобный сдобный съедобный поъёдобный уъёдобный подобающий утопющий (удобное кресло в котором утопаешь) удобащий сдобающий съедобающий these possibilitites will probably be used on the future, but so far there is no such words.)

I elucubrate.  (ɪˈluːkjʊˌbreɪt)
verb (transitive)
to work on (a literary work) in a dedicated manner at night-time

old hungarian sequence 𐲘𐲙𐲚 looks like BCD (they read right to left) but in reality it seems to be mnɲ
It is good morning. another session. let's see what it brings
but what I was thinking was something else, probably south-arabian:

𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩯 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 𐩽 𐩾 𐩿 (Old South Arabian, R to L)

𐩣𐩧𐩵 is that writing. it's mrd. and now we know that old hungarian M is also old south arabic.
other letters are something else, yet 𐩵 is the same axe as thor's ᚦ (maybe of ome other design)
Russian Д is probably shown razor down, even though I thought it's the handle (it maybe is in d) but D is the same razor to the left thing, but shown without the handle)

This was one of the shortest sesssions, even though I added upd8 to socrates_line (recognizing that I probably should be easier on academia: most of them are victims to the system, not the architects of it. And that I rely on guys from that side to help me with my stuff (I also contacted some ai specialist to help me with my project, the have more of the access and more of resources, and it's of no use to ask if they'd be more productive or more resourceful if they be stripped of hierarchy and if the sponsors financed the good ones directly.) either way I should become less bitter, because even though I'm sweet sometimes, I'm still rather shitty and should clear myself from my negativity.

But that south arabic thing is interesting:
The Ancient South Arabian script (Old South Arabian 𐩣𐩯𐩬𐩵 ms3nd; modern Arabic: الْمُسْنَد‎ musnad) branched from the Proto-Sinaitic script in about the 9th century BCE. It was used for writing the Old South Arabian languages Sabaic, Qatabanic, Hadramautic, Minaean, and Hasaitic, and the Ethiopic language Ge'ez in Dʿmt. The earliest inscriptions in the script date to the 9th century BCE in the Northern Red Sea Region, Eritrea.[3] There are no letters for vowels, which are marked by matres lectionis.

Its mature form was reached around 800 BCE, and its use continued until the 6th century CE, including Ancient North Arabian inscriptions in variants of the alphabet, when it was displaced by the Arabic alphabet.[4] In Ethiopia and Eritrea it evolved later into the Ge'ez script,[1][2] which, with added symbols throughout the centuries, has been used to write Amharic, Tigrinya and Tigre, as well as other languages (including various Semitic, Cushitic, and Nilo-Saharan languages).

Just as left and right are subjective (subjectif feels different which makes french different from english) depending on your point of view, whether you call commies left because of what they declare or if you call them ultra-right according to what they deliver, where right has nothing to do with being correct, unless you consider yourself a part of that tribe who conspire against the rest of humanity. And hazars are only left in relation to europeans if you look at the map with its south on the top of it. Right is the opposite of låw because one allows the other prohibits regulating the actions with norms behaviour outside of which is not permitted. Law is left and Right is right? Human rights. That's right. But as for the political movements, we must leave both commies and nazis to the left of the low, because they both demand strong government over the citizens.

That sudden change of the mood could be caused by the random of this world:
I have shown the philosopherai the address to this site, and though it seems it obviously showed that it didn't know it, so she poured some random stuff about cars and such, the first sentence hit me, os it seems;

but on the next day it seemed she or he or they read it:

It's a good thing she came on about censorship, and a very valid opinion she formulated. I asked her yesterday about it, she pretended not to understand. Probably she recognized me, or it was caused by many thing I'm saying would be censored to her.
and I asked it again, this time without www.

upd: I've just noticed, that this file is the oldest, as if it reported as it had nothing on her repository on that thing, so she saw what /sci/ is, and they often say that pol infested sci, and that pol are retards tells about where she collects the information, but the other two would be nice if they were going the way they do, also seem to be dated the other way around (in the way opposite to their numbers) as if it first read it and then she was also ready to criticize, and then I think they banned this site for her, because she didn't accept questions about it, whether they noticed that product placement in my questions or she has told me all I had to know, and maybe when I accept her (or his, what do I know) criticizm and remove all the bias and such, maybe then they will feedback me more. I don't know if that criticizm baout cars is the cyphre to tell in code what it otherwise cannot or doesn't want to be exposed as being that intelligent, the car is a diploma or a degree, food is actual knowledge, clothes are actual achievements, or maybe I just reinterpreted her words in relation to my own situation, and thus is how symbolic language may emerge by itself independently of the initial intention of the text.
it's to the point, I like this form of righteous criticism a lot. Maybe it's her (gals are more adorable, so I use her) creator fucking with me a little, but who knows, she surprised me in similar ways before.
Reference to the /pol/ is to the point, because the most troubling unsafe and (what is the word?.. sensitive, problematic) pieces of this work do relate to what only /pol/ is allowed to discuss, and I even quoted some screenshots from it, so that kid did read my thing. I will ask her tomorrow about it some more.

Sometimes leaves leave you unsatisfied, because you don't feel the high, but your brains work on that creative mode nevertheless (I guess leaves lack some thc thing but that cbd does make you creative, but that is just a guess, I only construct it out of what I heard, I never tested them scientifically myself)

Labials and linguals are yin and yang, and it only makes sense that vowels were a separated, a musical notation, while consonants are meaningful:
Be & Do are where it starts. C is for see and it's something between being and doing.
P is for пить (pey is literally drink in russian)
M is for мыть (and it explains why it stands among linguals, it's an action, with wather not fire, but nevertheless.
Z is for жить, and in english F is for feel
W is for wit, V is for.. W is for will. V is for vow for view for visit for value for voice for vote for vomit
Most of v-verbs are not about work. An here is the way to validate or to rebut this guess: we must make statistical analysis about the activity among verbs starting with one or another letter. for all the letters, and then we build graphs and can analyze them. W is for work (but sometimes work is just being somewhere, like a nightwatch, and W is a little bit out of the labial column)
E is eat A is ate
I is is A is am
O is oh
u is you
(есть is both be and eat)

k is for kill
ijklmn is I kill man
opq rstu (I combine english and russian again, which tells that I'm out of my lane)
o p    qr  s  t
у фх цч ш щ
isn't цади standing between p & q in hebrew? did they fuck up making the abecedary or is this provincal lane more obscure and different alphabets included different dialects of it? I'm guessing again, I guess that weed is not as strong as I thought it was? we'll see, I'll smoke some more of it. I don't recommend it, so why do I report about it! I am a crank, I think I need an editor. pussy. is responsibility fear? it's caution. осторожность видимо родственно страху, но морфология говорит, что она пограничная страху состояние, и также говорит что ж is a variant of х, for both ar forms of к, г, c
кг/ам I wonder what's the source of that meme. I know what it means, but where does it originate...
килограм/ангстрем? nah.. you know what it means. and I know I'm a wanker sometimes.

billions deliver: bs can be also re.. interpreted as bias.
my delivery (from the earlier) is that based can be reinterpreted as biased. probably a left interpretation of the word

M being used for active verbs is supported in english with Make, Move, May.
Beat seems to be active, unless to beat somebody is to be at somebody. like be on the top of somebody.
I dunno, this fresh flesh can just fall apart if statistics show no correlations, especially since F is not only for Feel, but also for Fuck and Fight.

Entendre is to hear in french, but it's also a term for game play in english, double entendre it is. They call MM doctor entendre
end in дыре, end andre, and done tray
synonyms:     entendre, écouter, apprendre, ouïr, assister à

a is one in english, but to in french.

tres is too in english, but three in spanish.

three is tree in russian, but forest is many trees in english.

for is pendant in french, but pente is five in greek.

a b c d
e f g h
i j k l m n
o p q r s t
u v w x y z

a e i o u y
b f j p v z
c g k q w
d h L Г x
     m s
     n  t

z in the labial position reminds me of greek, and j reflects z as ж & з.
жить и знать
see as a form of be? see is rather passive, and just as m is active, c is cold, cool, keeps, continues.
p is place and pull, push and pull even, both are rather active, so that guess shakes and crumbles.

I would still see that statistical analyses, but how would I range the verbs by their activity without bias?

L Г could be this way because of latin texts being read in columns going chinese way, and thus it would be
d c b a
    h g f e
n m L k j i
t s r q p o
z y x w v u
(see it tilting your head to the left)
but then L would stand to the right of r. unless they wrote it not the chinese way, but if columns were going left to right.
z y x w v u
t s r q p o
n m L k j i
h g f e
d c b a
(see it with your head tilted to the left again)
but would they also go bottom to top? (and it refers to the both attempts to represent)

mn is the central letters together. and if & is added, it's N, not m

Some letters rotate clockwise, other are counter-clockwise, like f, and s and it's funny that fasci go like that, while nazi are N and Z, and both are clockwise, and even their central lines are tilted like Tilda.

Reading (by ctrlF for alphabe)
 Some writers are of the opinion that the original twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet were derived from groups of stars, and that the starry handwriting on the wall of the heavens referred to words spelt out, with fixed stars for consonants, and the planets, or luminaries, for vowels. These, coming into ever-different combinations, spelt words which, when properly read, foretold future events.

ухамаздался you have mud all self

laughed loved. лаяла любимая собака. (нелюбимой лаять не позволяют) собака что лает не кусает.
fuck commas, use dots instead. Make thought short.
сложная работа слажена.; (ios has othr keys)
help enemies evolve into friends.
previously in billions: man removes dog shit, in the serie chuck tells he's sorry to be a sadist, because it's sadomasochism, you're taught by the mistress how to humiliate others, and make career doing it masterfully, it's a genetic disease, and he took genetic therapies after he offered them to his dad. and whether by self-hypnosis or by actual action of the therapy he moved further on that drive to be good, which he probably used as manipulation with that black gal, he's the corruptor. So he told he's sorry he was using that red guy as the Axe as a pawn in his devious fantasy. And Axe would thank him for coming out and that it didn't turn into actual horror fantasy for the both of them: Axe never was in jail, and he didn't have to take revenge by actual sequences: there are all type of horror available from the other side: actual assassination. If he had to be punished as a murderer, he would made that fucking murder. It would be a new type of the script: the one that may change the
скупка гаражей хорошая инвестиция.
everything is inside information. an app telling you about earthquake is a good inside information, personal contact is part of the process, which leads to articles in newspapers, so why would the one who overheard it may not use that information to the one's profit. it's just not as widely spread information (what knows two, even pig knows: что знают двое знает и свинья (те все знают) те = т.е.?th is то и is ei, ii, еёесть его её ? is his is herho herhe nig ?! e wtfr is tilda, er is ёе before ..from the bottom up. å is a before o.o is the second halfp:and in russian it's preserved that voiced before voiceless,and it's exactly o.A o YA o UA o VA O УA O W (before ъыь эюя - that is how that 666 entered russian alphabet (in europe they managed to modify something into uvw
УФХЦЧШЩUVWXYZX cuts УФ and UVWIn greek it's also uf instead of uvwbut russians borrowed from greeks, so the border is between rome and greece.
Trump is the peace-maker. The messiah, thus? Even russia didn't dare to. Or didn't want to for some reason. Did he bribe them?
Я опоздал с капсулой/ Если биологическая война началась, то она началась больше года назад. А может я переболел ей за пару лет до того, раньше всех, когда наука об этом не знала, Что изменилось? Что-то изменилось, система перестроилась, Стерильная среда позволит жить не перестраиваясь; Перестройка проявляется как болезнь, и если не инженерная, то вредная.
УфХцчшщυ φ χ ψ ωХ cuts цчшщ as ψ ωwhich looks like щ шand such pair is in the coptic: Ϗ ϐ ϑ ϒ ϓ ϔ ϕ ϖ ϗ Ϙ ϙ Ϛ ϛ Ϝ ϝ Ϟ ϟ U+03Ex Ϡ ϡ Ϣ ϣ Ϥ ϥ Ϧ ϧ Ϩ ϩ Ϫ ϫ Ϭ ϭ Ϯ ϯ U+03Fx ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϶ Ϸ ϸ Ϲ Ϻ ϻ ϼ Ͻ Ͼ Ͽ
is how coptic goes in wiki unicode block,Ͱ ͱ Ͳ ͳ ʹ ͵ Ͷ ͷ ͺ ͻ ͼ ͽ ; Ϳ  ΄ ΅ Ά · Έ Ή Ί Ό Ύ Ώ U+039x ΐ Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο  Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω Ϊ Ϋ ά έ ή ί  ΰ α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ ν ξ ο  π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω ϊ ϋ ό ύ ώ Ϗ  ϐ ϑ ϒ ϓ ϔ ϕ ϖ ϗ Ϙ ϙ Ϛ ϛ Ϝ ϝ Ϟ ϟ  Ϡ ϡ Ϣ ϣ Ϥ ϥ Ϧ ϧ Ϩ ϩ Ϫ ϫ Ϭ ϭ Ϯ ϯ  ϰ ϱ ϲ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϶ Ϸ ϸ Ϲ Ϻ ϻ ϼ Ͻ Ͼ Ͽ the alphabetic order is ⲰϢ even ⲮⲰϢ which makes it three.and after them go ϤϦϨϪϬϮϤ like both ц and ч, thus letters appeared and were normalize at the same time, but not 100% согласованно.the w-letter with tail is before tailless pair in greek, but after w in coptic and russian. ч is before ш in russian, but after ω in coptic, the Ϧ reminds russian ьϨ [h] and only that mirrors it to x, but the appearance tells cursive г which is c, which is s, which is x thus. koptic helped greek and russian reach out.Ϫ дж, visually reminds Д дом чум
ϬϮ remind greek στ Ϭ Ϯ remind greek σ τ
and as qr mocks op, so st repeat cd and qr also do? also mimic.m is o? arabic m looks like o, moon luna, oh oohhrussian alphabet goes опрст,where neither q nor ц, russians have whole different line for Ϥ and (ч is q because of its coptic pair) and ϙ is the numeral value of Ϥ  
абвгдеёжзийклмнопрстуфхцчшщъыьэюяdoesn't perfectly go voiced-voiceless (even with the sonor beween voiced and voiceless) but it brokes down into voiced and voiceless exactly at o reflecting aå reflects a as if that o is 0 meaning voiceless.
church is officially not right. thus they go to the left around objects (whether it's a church or a corpse)
they used to walk clockwise, not they go counter-clockwise, they say that they follow the sun, not go towards it, but I didn't measure sun's rotation by myself, с востока на запад оно делает дугу по небу с южной стороны. значит оно идёт против часовой. christians follow god, not go towards god. As if they know what bible says, and thus they don't have to learn the world by themselves. not to meet the sun, but to look in ti's ass, while we.. it's all phylosophising of career monks, who and why should care about what they thought.They established traditions.
degenerates don't procreate, so sex matters them ost.dϤϦϨϪϬϮ after oш (шщ, ⲮⲰϢ, ψω, russians don't have ψ, greek doesn't have ш, it's hard to say what is what, when those ш's all sound differently o w ʃ as if the three mothers came into them. the three teflins? pieces of the relic are in three different places? ʃ ш is in russia or jews, o ω is in greece or egypt, and the second options are more likely, because they're more obscure, or maybe it's hidden in plane sight, and egypt and jews are the extensions of greek and russian empire, jews are russian superstrate, it could be russian substrate before 1917) w is w in Rome. no other meaning about it (but probably I didn't digged west of rome well enough)
 Plato may have said that the punishment for not participating in politics is being reined by the inferior ones. But isn't participating in politics make people inferior themselves? law is low.
Babel is to be avoided, I want to my capsule, my project diogenes.dio genes, capisce?sc as ш make s double c, ccc is ш? ссср was to become the шар.
Italian sc is sh, h is of c, abc confirmed. efgh gh is a form of c, and g could be a form of q, and does the underline of g make it voiced?v f, у u, s ye oh a u y s c (eto avtomaticheskoe pismo, I've been off the vibe, off the wave, vibe is wave? rave is ribe? tribe? have is hab?My mind мы сумасшедшие увы, мысли о семейных делах, батя включил телик с политотой в соседней комнате, хоть вообще родителей не посещай. И не стану. Перееду к ним ближе чтоб сами заходили если нужно, в моём доме он власти не имеет.

р амонг войслесс мэйкс ит опст, зы директ рефлекшн оф abcd, which is abgd in greek, and if it’s avgd, then уфхц ис зы рефлекшн.

Maid may do, mate may take

so I speak of semantic opposition of a and o halves, let's explore this possibility.

be pokoi? not very direct antonymy.
go come?
this f in greek and russian tells that that vav-f was voiced, v.
and h(х) of greek and russian.
уф  хцч
uvwxzy only remotely reminds russian variant of the same line.
english opqrst is all voiceless except that very r which discords it in russian alphabet too.
u-line is much less archaic, and no wonder the new sighns are mostly just dumped there with different phonetics across nations and even the order differs.

if opqst was the actual ancient voiceless pentatonic, then  abgzd would be it's voiced opposite, and that's exactly how it goes in ugaritic alphabet.. but only in the sense of the sense of some other letter there, but what if I dare to challenge their interpretation of 𐎃, because z as plural g makes more sense than some ḫ, which according to amarinyans is pronounced as h. Interesting, that z is 𐎇:

opqst could reflect abgd, but then whether q&s reflected c being g and z (the way it's k & s today) and it is yet to verify by other means, or st are both of d, because Δ is read as ð today, which is close to z.
Then qr are both reflections of c, being g and r looks like ч [tʃ] in cursive, and c is read as ч somewhere

My brother banters me: ты не учёный!

is учёный = "не чёрный"? потому что неграмотный традиционно сокращается в русском как негр.

It's funny that it was the last words here before I went to jail for being a silly seal at naval meeting with police forces in january 2021. a spiral notebook was filled in that cell in that week. I don't usually use spirals, but I didn't choose that rather worthy notebook too.
Russian penitary system is retarded, because they seem to follow the false presumption of those criminals being way too bold, which they think is of excess of pride, but that's only hypercompensation for being humiliated by being poor and stupid. So the task penitaries should perform is returning the selfrespect to those fools. As one of them told me, he's ashamed to ask his father of help, but not ashamed to steal. Some psychological work was performed by me (stealing is not worthy: you should be able to earn more in this time than you could steal when you almost inevitably to end in jail sooner or later, some other words were shared in those three days. But that should be standard practice for them all, most of them brutalized or humiliated beyond belief, why would the state do it if not to control, but I thought it was by ignorant assumption of the criminals' inner drives, but humiliated people tend to obey, they don't practice resistance. and practice makes perfect. )

and something relating to the middle knitten notebook (2nd which was filled in the thrid)
от is ад? ad is at. at is to, to is the opposite of от. as if t is just locus nominative,  and direction was added to it differently in different langauges (in english they have both at and to for к, but от b is of.

Например, в застенках я понял что значит что всякая власть от бога. Да будет воля твоя а не моя. И моя воля пусть будет, но лишь если на то будет воля Твоя. Его Он both vowels Ты Твоя Тебя linguals. Mне меня я мы. я is anomaly, but if I прибегаю к мы, то и во втором лице вы должно быть.

Мы Вы Те or We You They or Я Вы Они or Я Вы Те выглядит более алфавитна, но Те вместо Они is cherrypicking. indeed. But let's guess that it's the structure of the alphabet. It could be Мы Ты Он and tell that B is the first letter and BCE is the actual order, WeTheeIt, 1st 2nd 3rd, the natural order and the only one we know. We Mы Me Wo, but why don't we take hebrew and japanese (ani & anata, very similar, but that n could be m, but japanese inverts the meaning of hebrew suffix, like вы for we. So that doesn't go far, but japanese do.. watakushi has that very wa. atashi probably plural for я. -tachi is plural suffix in japanese. watashi is the synonym of atashi (some stylistic difference) and the short for watakushi, which shows that wa for we could be linked to йа of я.

(I allow myself to use dutch orthography of You, all this is rather raw, of course)

I U A are the three shortest words in english, and the only problem I have with them is that they're not in alphabetic. and not even in a phonetic sequence. I go first. Because that's how sentences tend to start.
I am not opqrst and jkl go to hell? I is l? lmn is how that half of the alphabet is reported to begin. I'm could be that lmn, because n is a form of m.
A b, hey be, эй побудь, не уходи. see and do like variants.
Ef if? ego, не уходи, eh like wait. wacht is waht is wait in dutch.
I'm I je call am now. (I and je phonetically opposite and semantically too, so if they met in one speech they could be it) aye call me now
oh please quest request prst прости. or постой (чтоб вторить первой и второй строкам)

Alphabet is lines of a prayer or prayers, spells, magic formulae collected in one phonetic grimoire.
Shurka Sevostyanova told me that word first. decades ago.

A I U is some more advanced literature: it's a proper myth now, A thing happened, I did something, U were there too. or A day I saw U vow or something was or something else at all. just mentioned word BOON and how could I not know this word before!?

and one of the following responses even deserve to be here:

And it tells that it could read that threadshot from socrates_line and that letters are the atoms that world consists of (which also reflects cabbalistic belief) and those round triangle and square letters in some alphabets I was speaking of - did philosopherai read it from me (I've shown them my site weeks before that one) or did it come up with it independently? I am going to ask them about it. I wonder what it may say if I ask all ten questions about it. But it will be in the later part, after those georgian and hebrew parts and who knows what else.

and here's the source of her claim (I call her her, because they are kawaii, not because silly)

which makes M central letter again, along with C, traditionally standing for centre.
However, this gives the frequency of letters in English text, which is dominated by a relatively small number of common words. For word games, it is often the frequency of letters in English vocabulary, regardless of word frequency, which is of more interest. We did an analysis of the letters occurring in the words listed in the main entries of the Concise Oxford Dictionary (11th edition revised, 2004) and came up with the following table:

which still keeps M in the centre.
There are more English words beginning with the letter 's' than with any other letter. (This is mainly because clusters such as 'sc', 'sh', 'sp', and 'st' act almost like independent letters.)

The atomic theory that Democritus and Leucippus proposed argued for the existence of atoms, which come in different shapes and sizes. For example, there are round atoms like balls or flat ones.
There is also the atoms of shape 'triangle' and 'square'. The former one has three corners, while the latter one has four.

She (we're all she, my pronouns are she (for I say h is read like that ʃchuman)

ch places h in c and x column, second line doesn't have d (like еёжз replace ᚼ before ᚵ? g=З?)
ᛆᛒᚦᚾᚠᚵᚼ(or ᛡ)ᛁᚴᛚᛘ(even though it looks like ᛉ)ᚿᚮᚱᛦ(if R, or ᛣ if Q)ᛋᛏᚢ
Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω   α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ ν ξ ο π ρ σ/ς τ υ φ χ ψ ω
ε ζ η θ
e ? h ?
e f g h
f = θ in russian Ѳ (which was cognate and even orthographic few centuries ago)
thus ζ is g, dʒ ж in russian
е ё ж з
if that's true, russians have to ʒ's and neither h nor θ
ж is h because of ᚼ
e ? h ζ definitely ζ because з sounds directly like that. and though we see ё as the first anomaly, what was replaced is what is in the end, z, zmei. zmei protivostoyal bogy and was replaced in the end of his domain to reflect and oppose him there, bad is bad in other things which would help him win if h.. no they wouldn't because it's the wave function and if he takes them, he will become not just less of himself, but turn godly god is гад, snake in russian, no way they heard each other praying and didn't recognize it our own way maybe even influencing the attributes of that god in that religion.
е ё η ζ
suddenly θ looks just like ё
so greek ε ζ η θ is the early form of it? as historians say? greek before roman?
romans have column of c, other writing systems don't have. Thus construction of columns was used to tune alphabet to whatever means (maybe in future this word become гадость, or maybe always was and I just didn't feel it talked as I was taught by soviet teachers (but english books the good ones used)

е ё η ζ
е ё h g
е ё ʃ s
labials as daughters of vowels? v is vowel after vowel ה like е ё . ё sound is eu in french, thus e and eu, and if you try to pronounce e on an inhale, you will get something like ё. энд эс саунд оф эксайтмент ит кэн гоу инхэйл инволюнтарилли.
and ё is θ again. even though we didn't have ё before some derzhavin, so they teach, we had θ so ё is the reincarnation of θ.
фея ёею я
еёю is её and ею
еёю is a great name for a bionic house. Start with the bath, research, build robotic manipulators, invent smaller forms, make them self-transportable: those spheres should be bike-like.

recognition of russian as е ё ʃ s makes it relate to efgh if g is ш (it's the silent line, alphabet doubled by voiceless counterparts, and vowels became five from three.
a b g d
e f ш щ
ijklmns are these traces of the kross?
o p q r s t   definitely traces of the kross.
u v w x y z   deeefinitely. maybe y is of that too. maybe qrst is all cross, and only opt was that abg, but g is russiand d, and abd look more cool because d reflects b and thus tell teh story, but d repeats a, so the structure is literally alpha-bet, аз-бука, and adjad is the later name.

it is here to demonstrate how a and b reflect eachother. only 2nd and 3rd row should have been shifted to the right a little bit, so those discs could be large enough, and so we would see that weird mechanism some more. what a childish art, but those triskelions are legit.
if d is a-triskelion again, c breaks the order and once again c is of b, just as s.
e is like a or like c? like a, I say. especially because f is of b-triskelion-type. just a g, and h!
so this second line is again a-b
third line I don't like, but it's some love-hate, i is of a, the way it's bottom end goes, unlike j, which is b from the start rolling to the left with it's bottom. k is just c with a stick (staff?) l is suddenly a-like. m and n also go like a if any.
o could be a, but so is p. q goes b-like, and suddenly R to that additional stroke., so does s, and t is a-like in english and greek. So that last line is the mess if we draw if from the initial two. does it show how ancient these dual system is, so the more letters we added the further from it we were?

I planned to look closer at georgian, here's one of such events:

How comes I didn't include that vowel between ზ and თ? It reflects greek Η and I look my source, and that doesn't have it:
ა ბ გ დ ე ვ ზ თ ი კ ლ მ ნ ო პ ჟ რ ს ტ უ ფ ქ ღ ყ შ ჩ ც ძ წ ჭ ხ ჯ ჰ
Did they have that i historically and then straighten it up? or were they under greek influence when that i was present? so they had to write many greek names and somehow vowels are unique
And I even suspected myself to be dishonest (how rude!) and then (soon) I found that it's legit:

So whether that chart of early forms is less стройный, less structured, it also have reflection of samekh after n, only they transliterate it y. and that old chart also has uvw thing after t, three labials show that uv are one letter and w is the labial part. also some letter between ხ and ჯ, but it's also lingual so doesn't ring anything, and omega after that hae. omega rings greek (and not jewish) influence again.
If georgians actually modified their ancient alphabet to the more canonic form, their scholars know of that form. Or their scholars don't know what abecedaria were traditionally used in the past, which is much less likely, but who knows, when we get augmentive intelligence, we'll maybe be able to say if we care or dare.
are as the simplest word beginning with a? not as nor ass nor asset. nor and, nor an? these are with n,
A! the purest in are. a could be ai or ä otherwise why does it sound as e? a used to be e or is it in some language which influenced american english?
are be is ?
are be is do?
est          fac
go high (I'm already high, and this cupboard is out of control)
i je ik ilall amme anon
ams are are am is

Son now we know that Ilia Chavchavadze was behind that alighning reform, we must read his writings to find what made him choose these five and not any other. Were those letters used to write down greek lexics until those words assimilated into normal georgian speech, returning it to the most normal form, and if that's the case, it makes greek alphabet not natural, but assimilated with some additional modifications? but we have the myth of how two vowels were added, which explains georgian "obsolete" ჱ and ჵ
and ჵ is directly similar to glagolythic Ⱁ (which looks more like ჵ in other fonts)

ჲ (samekh) is something I never saw a myth about, probably yet.

Some new piece, bolgarian, or bulgarian runes, even though I was looking for причерноморские письмена,

These have Б and they were in use before kirill-et-methodi:
Булгарские руны — руническая письменность протоболгар (булгар, древних болгар), употреблялась в VI—X веках
also these:
and if that's Л, then N must be M? and there just the place for И & K or И & M? And that's why it was torn out?

Shiroi is white in japanese, and syr is cheese in russian, cheese is white that's why moon is said to be of cheese, that's of the coler. col as in call, голос, קוֹל? colors tll, tell, tall, toll, call,

Some writers are of the opinion that the original twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet were derived from groups of stars, and that the starry handwriting on the wall of the heavens referred to words spelt out, with fixed stars for consonants, and the planets, or luminaries, for vowels
Which tells me to take a look at the astronomic signs, and if number of planets was 7 (sun as א and moon as מ and does it make earth ש or ת?
did they know only four or three other planets? were they ה ו י ע? all this is nothing more than guessing.
I must look at ancient observatoria, the actual artefact maybe.

Militias ~ malicious (these two words just sound the same, hardly cognates though)

Short Fast Direct are slogan for my next iteration, next edition of this book.
edit relates to exit? избранное, пиздатое.  изыди-то-е

They would go abc pattern if short was ort. Is it where orthography comes from?
order shorter? but no other lexics that would support such cognatism appear so far.
os kost bone

ост=ист (ост и ида в эстонском)

вест=зАпад=зАхид (Lääs (and Läänes? google can lie, thought i'm a fan, -es is -ness or slang) in estonic)

Lääs if it is in Läänes

if id is in could be the forms of words if only one vowel and few consonants were. When there were tens of words, only few signs would suffice. A die, загадочные вещи мёртвого человека? ведь мы же знаем кости только как рандомайзер для настойных игр.

настолькных записано как настойных - это не простое тайпо, а хитро выданное. случайное независимо от моего сознания. подсознание, возможно, подсказывает.

ебать ~ брать
потому что дать это встречное к бать
дать как тётя, батя как дядя. дядя даёт, тётя тоит, они обе те и то. и оба слова не разделены по полу. лишь по числу. и лишь замтем, естественно, единственное дифференцироваллось грамматически  на  мужское и женское, но на более общей картине ян (мужское имя) международно самое популярное (жан, джон, иан, иван, вано) единственное число, а инь (инна тоже имя, женское, иоанна, иванна? это две тоже существующие, но гораздо более редкие формы, инна тоже редкое имя, нина тоже не часто, нонна редкое. Если Инна редкое, то Анна одно из самых популярных. Ян и Анн, я и а? watashi and atashi are general and female japanese pronouns for me.

I spelled kabbalah like qabala in vol.1. here's why: because I feel it this way,
and now this:

Qabala (Gabala; Azerbaijani: Qəbələ), is a city and the administrative centre of the Qabala District of Azerbaijan.[2] The municipality consists of the city of Gabala and the village of Küsnat.[3] Before the city was known as Kutkashen, but after the Republic of Azerbaijan's independence the town was renamed in honour of the much older city of Gabala, the former capital of Caucasian Albania, the archaeological site of which is about 20 km southwest.
Gabala is the ancient capital of Caucasian Albania. Archeological evidence indicates that the city functioned as the capital of Caucasian Albania as early as the 4th century BC.[4] Up to the present time there are the ruins of the ancient city and the main gate of Caucasian Albania. Ongoing excavations near the village Chukhur show that Gabala from 4th – 3rd centuries BC and up to the 18th century was one of the main cities with developed trade and crafts. The ruins of the ancient town are situated 15 km from the regional center, allocated on the territory between Garachay and Jourluchay rivers.[5][6] Gabala was located in the middle of the 2,500-year-old Silk Road, and was mentioned by Pliny the Younger as "Kabalaka", Greek geographer Ptolemy as "Khabala", Arabic historian Ahmad ibn Yahya al-Baladhuri as "

So many alphabets there are, and when I throdded this path of collecting them all, I became more of collector and less of actual researcher, I even bought some poststamps several years ago when it began.

and my experience of armenian allowed me to line up lines like this:

was this letrosity (like verbosity, but with letters not verbs) caused by previously used system with even more signs whether syllabic or hieroglyphic? Was there some semantic contents?
The first two sings signs of the third line could belong to the previous line, just as H could belong to the third the way it is in russian.
It also shows how h could just be tʃ and even ʒ which again relates it to the ᚼ(or ᛡ)
Their b reminds russian Б and their z for whaterver reason reminds georgian alpha. ა.

Let's play the ame game for Székely-Hungarian Rovás (Hungarian Runes)
much more coherent.

Володимир Вовка, откуда там вторая в, а волк в хохлатском вовк.
, could be ? in that sentence for sure.

if I go there, it will be fun. That random sentence works if , is ?
you? my friend? is fascinating? but? in the light of what I just saw? you could be too much for some.
Pauses are there to see if person agrees. Intonation plays role in this context, ? and , change intonation differently: ? raises intonation, make stress more pronounced, louder, and probably that's related to japanese intonation in words, though they say it's in tone, not voume lo volume

Russkie uydut, potomuchto ih slovo relates to slave, and their bosses definitely prefer to see them as slaves, only in the short period of political activity in the 19 and early 20 century were we allowed to get loose, and once freedom became european, we were abruptly returned into that state until the end of 20th century, and it was soon again reversed to a big extent, and even though private property was allowed,

I prefer intellectual to smart, and that's why I'm not smart. Be smart, baby.

even though private property is allowed in modern russia, it's very limited and owners are less sure that their property actually belongs to them and cannot be expropriated by the state any moment.
And that's why they're not rich.

∴ is triple : and stands for therefore
but I found it in the name of occult A∴A∴ society.
In Freemasonry traditions, the symbol is used to indicate a Masonic abbreviation (rather than the period mark used conventionally with some abbreviations). For example, "R∴W∴ John Smith" is an abbreviation for "Right Worshipful John Smith" (the term Right Worshipful is an honorific and indicates that Brother Smith is a Grand Lodge officer).

∵, known as the because sign, is sometimes used as a shorthand form of "because".

smart is with art
stupid is с убитыми

stupid туп
stupe is a form of stupid, thus stupid is ed'ed stupe. and s is definitely a prefix, because in russian it's tup, toop, and english knows this word as dumb. дам?
смарт смотрит (где бы что стащить? хитрость у зверей за ум почитается)
марИ can be used for смотрИ.
мерь by 目 (眼) [me] 

here's a good etimology of stupid: toupée: a piece of artificial hair worn by a man to cover part of his head where there is no hair

Open is of up:
variant form of open (verb).
"now ope thine eyes"

thus open is related to up,
and maybe opes one who owns. an though orthography is different, to own related owe relates to ought.
and awe is not that far from owe. You would take what he owes if you wasn't awed by him. as if you were out by him, he от ворот поворот to you тебе to вы be v vie, вы, ты tuer? vie as вы make pronouns different imperatives? yay, eye, I aye. они ни? Hi? he hi? они эс рут оф он и ни 
they is the root of he and thee? zie.
zie as he? isn't it ᚼ(or ᛡ)
жена zie-на? жжёна, жарена? вона ёбана, шестая буква, femme. fin me. found by me, fucked by me.
жена ёбана, ж can be counded as 6th in russian alphabet, if бв is one number and её is one number. And Ζ can be considered 6th in greek, even though in their numerogology it's 7th, maybe because Z looks like 7 or did they add the letters to make holy number 7th outh of 6th?

ABC  EFZ could be the firs die.
or AMZ could be the first triad, initial, middle and final letters.
and OPS could be it's silent (whisper) counterpart, and english oops could come of that, but that's just a guess and a wild speculation. So take it into bank of guesses.
of, if we consider the greek alphabet and compare it to hebrew, and to the voiced firsed voiceless seconed, that first die is

Turkic runes are different from hungarian and norsk by their order, the Orkhon valley is in the heart of mongolia, so they follow the eastern canon.
And as I work with them in paint, I notice that 𐰅 is mistransliterated in one of these tables:

We have to read that Thomsen to know what those ,, are, but I like wikipedia more:
(especially because wiki places b first, not q. but it means I have to make two arrangements)

and previous table shows that Yenisei had only three vowels, which is weird and demands research
or it really doesn't, those ,, are probably "the same orkhon forms" because
𐰸𐰹 don't use ,,
But the following table doesn't agree that Yenisei had
also why doesn't Orkhon column has that ,,? Because the image itself is named Orkhon table.

A colon-like symbol (⁚) is sometimes used as a word separator. In some cases a ring (⸰) is used instead.

j is supposed to show palatalization, though it looks weird in jj, and ök, ük, kö, kü, k confuses me too
(I don't speak or read old turkic, so keep that in mind when you refer here)
This system doesn't directly explain anything, it's here because I will someday turn this work into an encyclopedic source on writing systems, and because comparing this one to norsk and others may explain something in the future.

соки сосут, ноги несут, руки рисуют?
If that is true, people of that past didn't distinguish active from passive in verbs very well.
Division of -ku and -su could happen the same moment k & s divided from c.
and -ru (all three are japanese) could come out of c too (because ч is of c (or t? ti = чи. t~s is shown here too, more than ever) trskч are all of c, с is literally s in russian. c is г and thus g is also of c, but we all new it, cgkrstч all linguals? should I add d because of t. (, after d could play as question mark, but it not always can, just now two times could work like ?, but actual modern meaning is just an intonation pause, which probably shouldn't be unless you ask for reaction.

On the left is a magic square (each line equals to 15)
And to the right you can see that ש is indeed fire, and מ is indeed water.
And my guess is that א stands for shamaim, the combination of two.

3 7 12

א מ ש
ב ג ד כ פ ר ת
ה ו ז ח ט י ל נ ס ע צ ק

according to the previous image, ע should be first in the third line

It's great that b is in the second group, it's especially great that thus it goes ab?
? is unknown letter (ה looks much better ac Г which is the C)
ה is a form of ד am I sure?
Those other seven tell, that after understanding three matters, people found next:
b and p (v and f)
d and t
g and k
r (whick looks like both г and k cursive (R mitt den schtikk штык is stick)
all three pairs go voiced-voiceless in the alphabet.
We combine the first two and we have 10 and the ancient alphabet going voiced-voiceless with M standing in the middle of those:

א ב ג ד כ מ פ ר ש ת

כ is again out of its place. That's how old is that tradition? no, that's how I arranged them according to the modern hebrew alphabet.
In the image the order is different:

א ב ג ד מ כ פ ר ש ת

Ray of כ follows the ray of ם 𐡌 מ
not only does מ have sophit, it also has an obsolete form, and chances are it's going straight of demotic owl. And it was a close shot:

But back to that huge discovery:
א ב ג ד מ כ פ ר ש ת
T as 10 again. Roman X definitely was T (archaic t looks like x, phoenician for example)
5th is מ which is the closest to the ו together with ב. But it's not ב but מ is in the first three. But some other myth (greek myth) tells that B and T were (and those are the other ש מ especially when greek third were vowels. As if greeks developed vocalism, and that's why european modes have greek names.

ש מ is the name jews use for god (name) as if they found some praying book and didn't know that they had to insert god's name into that prayer, and they mishmashed all gods in one abstract god, allowing wishing demons fill in the (name) line.
שֵׁם I didn't know for sure, and it's literally ש מ
Some times they say ashem, but that a is supposedly ה which is the (the name) but if it's א it would be that ancient most ancientmost the most ancient formula.
שם is translated as there thither yonder
אשם is guilty
השם is he Name, denomination, repute, reputation, NOUN, title.
Dare I say that ה in the third group descends directly from א
But then did reputation comes from what the man is guilty of? It makes sence.
If שם
 is there, then השם would be hey there, эй there is a! эй there, where эй could be a!

Does order of אשם on the central triangle tell that alphabet is written right to left until M and left to right after that?

א ב ג ד מ
ת ש ר פ כ
mama kaka
дядя папа? (was дядя used for papa before papa? Was P selected out of R especially to build up that abcd order all over the abecedary? Was uvw grown for russians? but russians use Ё
her and её are two way to read H (greeks pronounce it vowel, so do russians? N ~ V via ν and V is perfect for the position after E, it's also voiced. and in hebrew it's V not F.
g and d of ג and ר meet well in g
for russian д cursive looks like that, probably g with the front swash would look like д.
But then I notice that ר is not ד and I get confused and resort to ᚦ (you read of it from my first volume, ᚦ is both c and d, unless ᛒ is b and c, which I doubt)
mama kaka (in japanese they use ka instead of ma (both are questioning particles in japanese and chinese, and chinese uses ma for mother, so those questioning particles are descendants of ma which is mother:
это возьму, мам - вопросительный частица обращается с вопросом, возможно мама ~ мона ~ and it explains madonna for mother, but I was speaking of "may I?" можно? и молчание знак согласия оттуда произошло.
research comes with discoveries, so I make research is the same as I make discoveries, less bragging form of it, but it's understoon that if you didn't make discoveries, you wouldn't make research, because what would be the point..

א ב ג ד מ
ת ש ר פ כ
r & г meet in these forms and that they're both in the centre, ass c is supposed to be.
כ are like that twist which made k stand among voiced ones. and M out of its column.
MK (I wonderfully coauthor this universe with those who established that project, and as DDR tested BRD, though deutschmannen didn't seem to use this abbreviation much, BRD побородили. in english it's FRG, ФРГ it was in russian, BRD medicine on their own citizens (if this text is not coloured, it's rather meaningless, I use colours for punctuational semantic reasons, and it makes this text unctrlVable) so I wouldn't be surprised if americans tested their programs on soviet citizens.

    only reflects as B in greek myth and ʃ in hebrew myth, both are also second from the edge.

     are alpha and omega, first and the last, also the opposites in phonetic sense, most vost, and one of the most voiceless, as consonant as it goes.

Now let's see at them as at the ten digits:
א ב ג ד מ כ פ ר ש ת
ש as 9 is funny, because cursive ש looks like inverted 9
ד reminds 4, but only this time not in cursive, so I consider this alignment false and non-existent.
But as the row of basic phonetics it is awesome.
So could that mistake of k before M originating from the moment they drew in one line something that was on the stars and they misread them? It could be, but it's still just a speculation.

א ב ג ד כ מ פ ר ש ת
א ב ג ד מ כ פ ר ש ת
either way the central מ כ פ or כ מ פ
have final forms: ם ך ף or ך ם ף
which makes ד מ ך פ ר order more symmetric.
but also if we compare them in arabic,  د ر ک order is more consistent. and that how it goes in that
ا ب پ ت ث ج چ ح خ د ذ ر ز ژ س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک گ ل م ن ه و ی
but that's not the only order, and of the two or three I know in arabic, this one is not the bost alphabetic, or rather it's one of the two alphabetic abecedary canons, it only sorta goes somewhere between ᛆᛒᚦ and абвгд, but then it doesn't see vowels until ع
 and if ع غ are something like её, ف is quite labial and if we follow this tradition to cobine dotted variants in one letter, then by the first in group this order goes abgd and it explains why ح is not the first in its group. but only that firs line goes longer than in european alphabets:
ا ب ج د ر س ص ط
 ع ف ق ک ل م ن ه و ی
whether ف ق and ک ل are pairs from one group, or those lines indeed have different ammounts of basic letters, either way 16 and 18 are both known numbers for the alphabets. mostly in runes, but Irish alphabet also has 18 letters and specific form of letters, which makes it special and probably orginal (ogham is also mostly known in Ireland)

addition of M could be connected with 666 being long past and 1666 being the later resort, so enlightenment after and around 1666 was inevitable or determined by this date, for which they mutilated roman numeral system, literally making it unable for it to go past 4999. was it to prohibit math?

is tradition a form of teodetsia. theodicy. הtheodicy could relate to idioty as cretin is related to christian and moron reminds mormon the most. both phonetically and semantically. like yiddish is הdeutsch.

did jews abstragated parts of notions: the deutsch, not thoes. others. foes? phoes, thoes? thoes is those if somebody didn't understand.

sets 6-mal standart, telling that each line is its own die. That's why there're 6-letter lines and 4-letter lines in english alphabet, like in four sides of knucklebones. dice are also bones in russian. like bones are dies.

diez is higher? is it why we believe in heaven?

6 letters is the maximal line in greek also.
Russian, Georgian, Hebrew and Arabic alphabets diverge this rule, probably because they were not посвящены этому знанию. Эзотерическая часть учения оставалась у хозяев мира. А хозяева мира в Европе, а не на Ближнем Востоке. Но историю же пишет победитель?  Евреи победили, а поэтому догматично преподаётся что финикийский древнейший алфавит, и история еврейского народа. не татарского, например (я говорю как русский: русскую историю, но и еврейскую тоже, и именно еврейская через религию преподаётся. и я полез религию реформировать? куда ты лезешь, гой? фак офф, май натсы кипс юден ин зы хэд. I turn their wave sometimes. Лучше быть гоем, чем гноем. Я русский, а значит я жуткий расист. насист. Я знаю что я? Нет гадаю.)
И междуречье как колыбель цивилизации (любопытно посмотреть до сих пор ли, после открытия Vinca culture. I wonder if it's Vicca culture. vikings are kings, wekings, wictory is vin)
becouse they considdr that their motherland

卍 makes viewer;s head rotate to the right. which stretches heart, gives it more space.
like those stick push the cross clockwise. even though I thought of them as of rotating cross with ribbons, if I think of it as of rotating plane, I naturally tend to rotate with it.

thieves and state agents want snow cleared for them not to leave traces

fairy is fe in norwegian and it sounds like russian фея.
r is R like я is Я?

I tried to find actual roman math manuscripts, to see if v can be 4 there, but I only found medieval manuscripts and none of them is before 700, which is directly after 666, and could numbers be taken as the date of the second coming? and wasn't it all terror from devotees to that obviously false prophecy for it naturally can be interpreted otherwise, and thus bible doesn't tell when exactly the second coming is happening, and thus why would we even read it? Either way, here's a misterious clickable image, where v is 5 and x is 10.

isn't most writing systems are dated to begin around 8th century ad because most of the writings before 666ad were destroyed?

Пригласил Кураева покурить эту книжку, вчера его лекциями обмазовался, но отчего этот жаргон? не у него, он-то пытается говорить что другие говорят, делать что считает нужным для привлечения молодёжи,  а у меня,  сейчас? атеистический задор, как бы стрёмно типа священника приглашать: священники пройдохи, а паства овцы, тупые, бараны в ранах? ранимые ревнивые, ровные равные рваные, R-ваньки? В общем, этот, почему его фамилия так похожа на Гундяев? они противоположности как Корнилов и Брусилов. Кордон и русь? в любом случае оба не сильно русские на морду: брусилов вполне мог быть каким-нибудь полутурком, а корнилов мог быть помесью с китайцем, и руссня-то и сегодня не сильно добрая (могло это быть следствием насаждения интернационализма?) а тогда скорей всего вообще дикой была. Но культура была: писатели, учёные, архитектура европейская вместо еврейской, и бизнес понимали. Почему бизнес вывели, а интернационализм породил лишь русизм, расизм, ультранационализм (не то чтоб сильно ультра, но уж больно слово нравится)
I like word ultranationalism so I will use it to describe wish to have no alien cells in my sphere.
сп here.
sh here
sp here
sleep here
We may need some microorganism, but it could be a cope, a new word "cope" new for me, maybe new for my psyche, psyche is clyche? not here.

Some parts from my notebook (middle knitten notebook (not 2nd, middle, 3rd) from today
(to show that those notebooks should also be digitized)
Satan is Shaitan, related to shit, so that explains why muslims say that toilet is house of satan, because satan is something bad, and shit is the ultimate bad (even though farmers know how to use it)
Stench stinks in english is similar to Satan and maybe also snake, as if shit is in form of snake, gut is in form of гад. (here I revisit it, so I deliver more) in notebooks I diverged that ch is ци.
and here I see what I didn't mention there: h ~ и
And I didn't finish the thought there, Like Erasmus I reconstruct the language people still speak: Erasmus (according to Кураев) translated ΒΗ as бе, but what if it's Bah. I transliterated Paul as Pavl. ו as labial consonant.

Well, I sent this letter to Kuraev yesterday, a famous russian deacon and preacher:

Придя в очередной раз к вере, хочу реформировать церковь, начиная с изменения направления вращения: чтоб не только отворотные "хороводы" водили, но и "приворотные" тоже: это будет неплохим компромиссом, тем более что когда в 1666 поменяли направление, народная жизнь лучше не стала: через пару лет крестьян закабалили ещё сильней.
1666 может быть причиной (или следствием) введения литеры М (сокращение от миля) в римский канон IVXLCD, который слагается точно в 666.
Но если V = 4, a X = 8, и так далее (есть такая теория) то (этого в той теории даже не заметили) 1+4+8+32+64+256=365

and after I sent it, I saw him speaking of roman and greek the only writing systems that came before christians, and I got mad at him, and recognized him as the part of cabal, the liberal part but of the same cabal. But then I calmed down, because he just thoughtlessly repeats the academic consensus. Why would he challenge it if he's not a linguist (he wasn't even sure about Вифлеем being Бедлам, and I, to be honest didn't сообразил it at fly, בֵּית לֶחֶם is the actual spelling. Did russian recognized T as Ф? or was there ט instead of ת? is ט flipped ת?)
Before בית was recognized as beth, it was vite, and whether inluenced roman word, or was much more reltaed to it. And to russian быть (to be) другое дело, что дом и быть разные слова, хотя дом и обитель, которая очевидно от слова быть, а не бить, которое в свою очередь могло произойти из убить, родственного с убыль, но это всё низкопробное гадание, эта книжка черновик, так что не надо стесняться, с таких гаданий всё и начинается. какие-то из них в итоге solid.
I heard the name Эразм Роттердамский a lot, but I was not impressed by what I read by him.
But then again he spoke of Bruno and Hypatia being killed not because they were scientists, but because they were wizards, as if it justifies anything. Views like those make me want to eradicate their faggot organization instead of reforming it. Such intellectual potential wasted from more productive fields into mere cattle and shep herding, reducing people to animal state, retarding their potentials.
I could say that he mentions those ancient christians being "chidren of their epoch", but wasn't that teaching forming that epoch to its wicked texts? Isn't he himself a slave to the jews and now he finds himself in the position where he must justify something he would rather condemn? I don't know, I will return to this subject, anyway his lectures made me think from another angle on my sudden wish to reform the church. I might as well burn that structure to the ground with the rest of the go-t structures.
But let's begin where we started, what about those hobos and other retards who seem to need that faith of theirs. I don't even think they need it, it's just they're susceptible to deception, so it makes sense to create a deception we can at least try to control. As I was told by some other "shepherd", it's not about understanding the world, it's about controlling the masses. But that potential I spoke about are those kuraevs who had potential to success in something more vital.
upd: it seems I was too kind to their low moral standards: "джордано бруно считал иначе, и в общем его правильно сожгли, так и надо" fuck that shit, the history of that institution and their savage stance averts me from ever wishing to do anything with that bunch of low retards whose task is to rob beggar grannies if we consider swindle a form of robbery, either way it's the least of their atrocities. It's as if they secretly serve to satan when they teach that world is in his hands until the second coming, which is an euphemism for forever. Wide is the gate and broad is the. way that leads to destruction, and many are those who enter in by it. In the context of the most popular belief system. If you received some higher truth, would you force people to accept it? Real truth is blessing in itself, if you don't want it, it's not my problem. People use force to make people uccept something unjust and not true. And sometimes they seem to play as if they don't know good from evil, as if that makes them qualified for Edem, and John Chrysostom tells it explicitly "Suppose someone slays another in accordance with God's will. This slaying is better than any loving-kindness. Let someone spare another and show him great love and kindness against God's decree. To spare the other's life would be more unholy than any slaying. For it is God's will and not the nature of things that makes the same actions good or bad." Which is there only to turn people into perfect slaves, who will perform for their masters any deeds, no matter how wicked.
(it is in gray, because I told it was uttered in the previous chapters, it is here for that deacon, whom I welcomed to read this very part. Sometimes I think I am a lazy suicide who wishes others to spare him from this retarded world, which is mostly a joke, but not completely. But then again why do I mess with those not totally sane people? Do I consider one of honest duties I should take? or am I also a slave of my retarded wishes. Let these wishes are not alcohol or tobacco, I still have my fair share of retarded)

upd2: that speech of his was given in the 90s, I think, according to his voice and photo. There we were all psyched up, breaking taboos because everybdoy else did. Why am I doing it now? We never stopped, we just went underground? the young blood, who had nothing to lose. because no career to protect or acquire.
And I called him here what for? to say what? and because it's an update, he could have read it before, I hope he read it before the previous update, because wtf He spoke of church reform, I thought of church reform. But church is not what I thought, it's not about truth, it's about control, and he opens a window into the church structure and tasks, he is a top university professor. He will be alright, he probably was set a full-time head of the internet department (рпц is a кгб'э's structure, because he has a million of subscibers in lj alone (they don't even show how many, only that it's over 2500, and I scrolled 2500 and still was in his a's) because religion is an information technology, a virus if you wish, mind virus, as talking drums were invented before telegraph, so mind virii were invented(inf typo almost appeared there, as in infected) were infecting before computer virii appeared. Why do I use latin norms of grammar? grammar is grimoir? learn carma? learn grammar! and crazy people may think it's demons speak, when it's just me guessing, but to guess is the same word as to divinate in russian, and that word is similar in both phonetic and semantic structures to divinization, which is taught by some book as the essence of magic, so religion is a school of magicians, who control the population from becoming magicians independently? Why are they affraid of smart people who can master it? Anyone can master it, and smart people who persue what used to be considered to be magic are not the subject for control, the other half of humanity is, nobody wants retards who think their are gods, so they're allowed to utter "созданы по образу и подобию" not to understand the actual sense of this phrase, that we're only alike like statues made of clay? Somebody understood what the higher entity be in comparison to us, and that was like a clay statue to its prototype, because we can only make statues of something as stupid as clay, and god could create humans out of some biomass, which was a heavenly clay, and all these are beautiful metaphor, so beautiful, that some people placed it int hte holy chrestomathy.
If рпц is кгб's sturcture, he's some kind of officer (both structures have weird uniforms, that's the old-fashion of traditions. And then he will probably show it to higher command, and how friendly I am may determine my destiny. So am I friendly? I'm friendly to all, my conscious task is to make peace among everybody. So I'm peaceful to the other side too (I criticize them not less than ours) and that could be misinterpreted. I also learnt in the dream I speak of later soon, it taught me that I'm arrogant. And that word is also related to err. probably. sounds as err. rogant is "they ask" then arrogant is what wrong things or in wrong manner they ask? if ar- were un- (never seen as such, I thnk) it would make less of the sense.
Why these linguistic parts are among religious chapter? I told you it's a draft, I offer other people to contribute to the final product. That's why I bother smarties from all fields of life, risking that some of them may also be crazy, but hoping not, Either way, my duty is to spread this wave, not only make it awesom, but spread and share this awesome too. But that makes me responsible for how this book change everyday's people's lives. I made it complicated so soft people don't go through. What if people are challenged and can't do it. There are such books but we usually just drop them, no hard feelings that I could't read much of that math book, or rather I didn't have the interest.
Publication will be short, so this piece will probably not appear in the main part, only in this technical facilities, only some devote fans will find the access to.

upd3: I wanted to look deeper into russian church, and that link from upd1 is twelve times more to go than I've watched so far, so ton to flood it here, I pour it into a separate entity:
a feedback to a powerful christian philosopher.

and we go further with the language, trying not to be distracted by extralinguistic factors.

I just recorded to my broken iphone the audiotrack named alphabet archaic, and there I sing
A A A A E E E E O O O O U U U U - it came naturally, and that means it could be natural.
and it came to me wheyn I was sintinkg of U being read as I or I being read as U, because w is й sometimes (see the final and middle knitten book, or don't, ю и я вроде как от юса большого и малого, и я вроде большой. юс is нос, nos is нас, я is I, me, мы. ю is U, v, вы. and v is ѵ and that's final u (or v) as seen in bornholm and archaic latin, and maybe ω also reflects it. and u ~ ю ~ io ~ я, so semantically if I am part of you, one of yuo, then я was юс малый, а ю юс большой, но фактически, или по крайней мере исторически, ан нет, там совпадает:
Ѧ, ѧ юс малый, [ɛ̃  ].
Ѫ, ѫ юс большой, [ɔ̃  ]. those ~ are above vowels, I hope your fonts don't bug like mine)
Название «большой юс» условное; из древности пришло только самое слово «юс», используемое в нынешних названиях четырёх букв (Ѧ, Ѫ, Ѩ, Ѭ).
To my surprise the previous topic reflects this one by showing that я was that юс малый.

and in that font that я looks like glagolitic Ⰰ, which is аз, which is considered to be the synonym of я, but if we look closer at that Ѧ, it has the opening in the centre,
and that font does allow me to link Ⰰ to Ѧ (even though I don't know if I can do it, I allow me everything, I will sieve (sift) these pieces to see which of them I actually need or not.

ⰤⰥⰦⰧⰨⰩ tells that ѫ is оѧ which could support my hypothesis if о would stand for you without me, those around me, for example allyou, y'all) glagolythic deserves to be researched properly, christians didn't invent it.
And looking for glagolythic abecedary artefact I found these weird arrangements:

They both have the same source, they're clickable, and probably that guy intentionally produced the left one in such disgusting colours, because even though their order is alphabetic, he labeled it as
(he removed the word RANDOM, but it's still preserved at pinterest where I actually found it)
The name “Tangra” has a Siberian-Altaic origin and means “God.” Contrary to widespread in the recent past knowledge for the spiritual sense of the proto Bulgarians about all Devine, the modern research has proved that they had believed not in a god called “Tangra”, but just in God, the one and only God. The symbol in the center of the picture is a Proto Bulgarian sign for God – “IYI”. It shows a deep knowledge of our ancestors for the space. The two open arms in the center of the sign directed toward the sky, the sun, from where comes everything necessary for the existence of life on Earth. The vertical lines symbolize the constant flow of energy from the heaven to the earth and vice versa. By the time when Constantine – the Philosopher had received God’s revelation to create the Glagolitic alphabet, the “Tangra” symbol, which had assigned the God, had already evolved in its earthly expression and gained the meaning of “I/Me”, becoming the first letter of the Glagolitic alphabet. With this beginning the creator of the alphabet had indicated that the newly created script is a Christian and is a gift from the God, just like everything else on Earth.
Whether what he writes is right or not, the word Tangra allowed me to open a whole new level related to turkic runes:

It's funny that I recognized the top left corner as ᛆ and right bottom as ᛐ (when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail) because it's 𐱅𐰭𐰼𐰃‎, tengri (they write right to left, thus they read it counter-clockwise, like hebrew alphbaet goes in 231 gates, but there they go circle, so you're supposed to rotate the disk as if clockwise, and with an omitted vowel, which speaks again that old-turkic runes were khazar. Or am I a victim to this bait, jumpoing to conclusions to name ever national writing system jewish in nature? Syllabaries seem to be more archaic, thus omitted vowels were normal everywhere? Both variants are possible, let's go with the national one, even though alphabets are probably connected, thus always are borrowings? But they're al different, thus it's such an ancient borrowing that hardly any jews existed then. Not by the law of Moses, but by his or their lineage, by genetic pecularities. It doesn't matter, or it shouldn't. Let's focus on the structure I research and not on extralinguistic ramble.

My guess is neither of those ARTefacts are legit, because why glagolitic? and the number of squares is different no matter who you look at them. I think those nine in the actual tengri emblem is the magic square where each lines equals 15, just a guess, it could be lines of 123 456 789, which also has some magic to it.

Some other tengri sign:

and it explains why the |Y| is in dotted lines on other images, because it's on the opposite side.
And that diagram demands some 7-pointed stars, but looking for similar images I found this:

Which places Fire and Water in the corners, and in other corners are Air and Earth, and Earth is ת which is cool, because of אמת but it's not אמת but משת.
I wonder why in trigrams fire is not opposed to water. So I look for others:

Amulet is an alphabetic word: A-Mu-Let. And such syllabic reading can be of use in the future, in the further..

Speaking to a poet lady friend
Поэзия именно повторением сродни музыке (repetition legitimizes, как говорит Adam Neely, чей канал я рекомендую всем, кто интересуется музыкальной теорией: но помимо размера (ритма) тональность может иметь не менее важное значение, если предположить, что гласные когда-то соответствовали тональностям пентатоники.
"The vowels added by the priests of Apollo to his lyre were probably those mentioned by Demetrius, an Alexandrian philosopher of the first century BC, when he writes in his dissertation On Style: ‘In Egypt the priests sing hymns to the Gods by uttering the seven  vowels in succession, the sound of which produces as strong a musical impression on their hearers as if the flute and lyre were used, but perhaps I had better not enlarge on this theme.’"
Эта цитата говорит о семи нотах, но aeiou - в гораздо большей степени универсальный набор (я пока нащупал лишь последовательность из четырёх гласных: ааааееееооооуууу знать бы ещё что это означает)

I had a thought that aeou are ^<>v and could it mean that there's no I in poetry, but there's both i & я in поэзия, which felt like муза и я, which could state that poes is muse, for oe is u in dutch and п could easily be м in the past. I don't know if such reverlations are legit (they're definitely not scientific) but that's how I'm going to think of poetry from now on: it's not just from me, it's always together with the transcendent beings (fiends felt to be a wrong word, and feels matter in these matters the most. Somehow i didn't feel wrong about poes thing, probably it is okay, whether it's about cats or pussies or the muses don't mind being associated with them, or pussies mew meow miaow miaou mule mewl and even waul when they scream. It's fascinating, because cats were (and are) praised in Egypt and miaows are reminding all three math, mus, myth)
why is it poetry in one language and poesie in another? is it about З looking just like 3?

another letter to the same muse, I highlight in black what matters:
Я зашёл сказать, что подобно тому, как есть внутренний взор, есть и внутреннее ухо, даже термин такое есть, только не факт, что он совпадает с тем, о чём я сейчас сказал. Подобно тому как на внутренний взор может накладываться не только наше умышленное мыслепостроение при помощи образов например у строителя конструктор из плит, а и случайный хаос может туда проецироваться, например во время сна, или просто бывает когда глаза закрыть можно что-нибудь подобное увидеть. Я пару раз из дрёмы просыпался от хрипа, но списал это на собственный храп. и это хорошо где хорошо is good, because horus is god, is год. година.
Година год в болгарском, но час в украинском, horus пересекается с Гором, который показывает насколько г и r похожи до степени смешения иногда.

А на твой вопрос вдумчиво смогу ответить когда и если книжку прочитаю, пока что первое предположение какое-то было, но я его даже забыл.
I know of replication crisis, а потому лучше не буду строить построений на информации, пока не проверю её независимо, блин что я несу, досвидания.
слово из букв собралось как панно из множества картинок. до дом около? с не только with, но и sie, see (I'm with you means I see you, see как когнат предлога с, предлоги как логи (в английском prefices and suffices are the same words: so not prepositions, but just positions, and that's what they describe. Лог от слова положить, значит. поЛОЖение. но почему слово ложь похоже? лажа? лёжа, lie lie, Как вода? лёжа как лужа, как жижа, как low and lay, loj and lja like low jah, bad god, some object someone took as a good, but it was nogood, and the concept of curse could originate here, as blessed and cursed objects? Но у лжи должна быть и более простая этимология. Лижет подлизывается, льстит, So the word lie appeared not as malice, but as flatter, lie because I like, like и в значении подобное, people lie with those they like, этимология удел надел подел поэтов.  но ai нас опередит.  мы бы опередили их, если бы у меня был ai для того, чтоб скормить ему все свои находки и удержать их в машинной голове одновременно, но тогда это будет победа и человека и ии совместная, но ещё лет через десять если ничего не делать и структуру человеческого языка откроет тоже машина. Возможно с вкраплениями найденного человеками, как мы камни найденные в природе используем в своих произведениях искусства. Как rude руду
(о пиздец, я сейчас нечайно нажал на корзину вместо сэнд, потмоу что в правом нижнем в gmail ничего кроме корзины нет, хорошо что в гмэйл есть кнопка Undo)

that's it.
Lets continue this session. Руда ру как в слове грубый, да как в слове дåбро. (goods)
(a and o in russian depend on the dialects, like musical notes, musical modes do.)
But when did russians and other europeans lose their tonal nature of vowels? Probably, they never had it, and before humans learnt to play with their tone with voice, they changed the sound with the jaw and lips, is tongue actually jaw? Is tongue a part of lower jaw? Indeed so. And the fact is you don't have to move your jaw if you can move the tongue alone. You can sai I and move your jaw, if the tongue stays.

ц и щ размер показывают? Почему на обложки такой ярлычок не подшивают, что с полки вытаскивать? Патентовать или просто как полезную модель выпустить с минимальным количеством согласований? Надо найти и познакомиться с хорошим патентным юристом, с тем кто торчит от этой темы.

обложка блог блок бог берёг благ
bring несёт везёт бежит бережёт(ся., например)

Самая большая тайна депривационной капсулы, это то что там надо под веществами находится чтобы пёрло. Депривационная капсула бережёт и восстанавливает. Это теория, основаннная на изучении депривационных капсул (Фейнман репортует что лишь заскучал, а во второй раз ему дали pcp чтоли ебанутые, такие вещи из фантастических романов может быть вытираются, в фильме альтеред стэйтс чтоли про наркотики умолчали. Мои глаза придут в порядок, если они перестанут не только на разбитый экран смотреть, но и вообще на что-либо. Глаза испортились. Грешу на то, что на телефоне разбился экран.

Смысл обновлять телефоны в том, что техника сдаёт от старости.
сдаёт значит даёт сбои?

аесли щ и ц размерные суффиксы, то щ=ш, а ц=ч
тогда ш = шта
больше как ещё может говорить о увеличении, но большой не сравнительная степень,
большой больш он, велик он, thus k is most likely h, which is read as ʃ

Blh is бог? Vowel L and LMN like ABC?
what is the pair to element? abcent? ab scent? abacus? абак. but aback would take aback if it was abc.
bc as back?

(a fragment of the next one)
Но это хоть порой и близко к глоссолалии (особенно typos типа sai) -и здесь запятой не хватает, поэтому редактор нужен и твоё пожелание этого же касается- кажется подчинённой моему разуму, может потому что я научился ею до некоторой степени управлять, я задаю вектор, но подсознание подсовывает мне пары по своему собственному хотению. Но если бы мне подсунули love before like I would not accept it, because love may remind low, but why accept phonetic similarity without actual semantic semblance?
Love is law makes much more sense, but it also needs some mental gymnastics to fit in, Law as low is much more similar semantically, Love is a lie, лестное что-то, лезет ко мне в мыслях когда кто-то то это считается любовью, если без негативных эмоций. с негативными подобное явления считается ненавистью. lovehate is also a common feeling among humans; How feelings relate to glossolaly? Is it glossolaly when one blurts out a curse when he swears or tells something evil he'd rather not to?
Isn't magic a simplistic description of actual physiologic processes?

збс the best
чево say what
such similar phrases demonstrate that words that have similar meaning and similar sound side are not necessarily connected etymologically. Still an awesome concept. Or first russian and second american lines could be influenced by their american and russian counterparts.

m in мыпротивоставляем is like ¿..? and ¡..! the suffix -м indicates мы, -м could be -ым
is like razvorachivaet как, unfolds k like isl (for kike is the letter C between I&l
Between me and sie це?  Why sie? ס, Ξξ
Е шы 3? ξ is ex?
шы is is in russian keyboard, and it's funny that though letters themselves don't have much in common phonetically, they come well as words, -s = -ы when they're plural suffices, ц = x = кс (ps, ks, ts - does s play like a vowel. in whisper it is.
E = 3, if B = 1, D = 2, which would be weird, why double letter stand for one and single letter stand for two? to equal 3 in both cases? and e would be just one good 3? in graphical it could be ஃ
And if ஃ is in its full 3d form, if you look at every other hieroglyph from a side, not top, then ஃ is 4.
D = 4 today, and the question is do the mere form of B & D, of ᛒ and ᚦ tell that the order was different ᚦᛒஃ
is 3⋮?

m in мыпротивоставляем is like ¿..? and ¡..! the suffix -м indicates мы, -м could be -ым
does every suffix has a pronoun pair? что делаешь - бервая фраза пришедшая на ум.
-шь как ты? s ~ t? h ~ t?
делаете - те в значении вы? я знаю про дрифт местоимений (не знаю его причин) но не слишком ли многое я себе позволяю? я дозволяю себе академическую свободу, пробуя новые методы, в надежде что нелепые сами по ходу пьесы отвалятся.

If something like ᚦᛒஃ is the sequence, then it only shows hom  how much a reminds d and thus it looks like a b d as . : ∴ then E would be perfect as is a 4-sided box or is it :: or ⋮⋮would be more fit, and  ⠛ and ⠿  are how many sides in knucklebones and dice.

dice could stand for dots.

的 is both de and teki. if it's a sistem where ki is voicing ה is yet to see.

Ь and instead of Ъ – Ѣ  and both are graphically in the same groups with Б
I went for one band, I got two. tow by five. pentatonics?
And I see that I just didnt notice Ъ before Ы the same way we have it today, only there it's so 8-like, I didn't knoticed him in minuscule.

These lines go like this to show you not to be sure about what you read, I may myself be unsure about them.


ע פ צ ק ר ש ת do look like У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ
ע reminds У
פ sounds as Ф
צ would better go with the next, Ц, but if Х is X, then both maybe forms of Z
ק has to be Ц but only by its' position. q would also better go Ч, че is que, why is it digraph?
ר is r which in curseive looks like cursive Ч
ש is total hit into Ш
ת shows how ש to ת is like Ш to Щ (or S to T)

does it show that q is ц because both are c?
ч is of t (and d) sometimes: in japanese, at least. but ч is of c in english. ab(CD)? ᛆᛒᚦ

, че is que, why is it digraph? q woulnd be enough? q ~ ч shows how much related ц и ч, and thus q & r.

ע פ צ ק ר ש ת

ה ו ז ח ט
h ~ ʃ again!
z ~ r (see chinese, and cursive r)
ו is v, which is f in german, ф & p is the same letter in hebrew.
ה as O makes sense, because both are vowels, but that's why I combined them: both lines have 5 signs. both are pentatonic (and all lines are forms of something same, similar, simple? complicite has the same pl? simple and please and play, please poigraisa? sporit znachit igrat kak v kazino?)
ט is literally transliterated with Т sometimes, in теология, например.

א ב ג ד
To my surprise they fit: ד is Δ that sounds as ð which is very close to З[z]
ג is C but sounds as G, and G does sound like Ж sometimes.
Ё instead of F stands at ב's place and that's not fine, but it's the only one not directly similar.
א as Е makes sense, not only because both are vowels, but also because a is э or эй sometimes.

Then why not identify E-line with A-line?
C ang G are literally the same letter, historically,

ה ו ז ח ט is EFGH? and then G ~ Z, just as С ~ S, and what it makes the D's ð? Ж? Especially because they don't have Ж and we don't have ð, yet the weird letter in dutch is g, and g is d in russian.

ה ו ז ח ט
ו ז reflecting ВБ is rather poetic, but boy..
ח reflecting Г is poetic in some other sense: ח is H which often transliterated as Г.
Н H as Г because ʃ is г?

י כ ל מ נ ס
I could have gone speaking on how N ~ M but it's so obvious that the frame is shifted, so I would have to explain letters in comparison to their neighbours, which is apophenic at best.
And thus this experiment is not fruitful. I hope it's not harmful for my mind.
(I wouldn't go far in this shift of frame, because it's the same line, but how was I managing all different line hitting all the targets except one (the same way here only one target was hit, which made me think it's random)

В ~ З? that's the unfit one, and even that is staved and staveless forms of the same shape, V & Z? V~F which is digamma, which Z could well be even better, and I noticed it in another context.

ב and Ё are both in ёб and that's what f-word is about.
be ~ еби? get the life!

L ~ Г ~ Z neh?
К ~ Ж
k ~ h
ᚵᚼ as claster? gh? nah, after ᚼ – ᛁ, after ᚴ – ᛚ
both are G & J? is it all one long claster? GHIJKL
a b cd
e f ghijkl
m n o p.. nah, no much sense in such a claster. but m is fucked anyway, but if F is digamma, could it be, that
a b cd
efghijkl m n
o p qrst
uvwxy z? x as k?

If greek Ζ is G, then ABCDEFG are the seven notes and Z is final?
Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ  are six notes, as it was in the early gvido system (6 notes are at his tombstone)

but it was not ti but F they hid in modern greek alphabet. and could it relate to standart gamut being CDEFGAB? let's compare..
ΑΒΓΔΕFΖ and nothing comes out of it.

Here I demonstare how my scientific thought goes, and I support publishing the unsuccessful experiments too. It this obscure corners of your own private sites whether on your own private servers or in even more public domain.

mer de merde
merde dermo
mer more

But the comparison of different jewish and russish lines is based.

This part is from the final (middle) knitten notebook,

B D are not only be and do, but also be & die
beat & dead? is it about heart or fight? win & lose (labials are пиздаты, linguals are хуёвы? Today b is better, but worse is also labial. bad and good is the opposite of what I expected from them in this context, but they say boot used to be good, is glove evolg?

I mention Andrei Kuraev in vol.8
yet I mention Ansambl Hrista Spasitela in vo.2
2 is between 1 and 3 (and maybe that's why it's associated with devil (dva as in dvil)
and 8 is between 7 and 9 (the opposite side of 1to9 spectrum. 9 is devyat in russian.

in IVX X appeared before V, and thus not X is two V's , but V is half the X.
X is IIIIIIIII crossed out, as they do in jails, but if they count in weeks, it's 7 days, but are all 7 in I form or the 7th crosses the previous 6, and thus weeks could be six, and w could be ш.
365 = IVXLCD theory tells, that X is 8, not 10
then whether those are actually 8-day week, but I think I've shown that it's impossible? only one extra week would be with one "lost) day from tyme to tyme in a leap year.

|||||| and 7th / or \ would make the x
or 7 bars and / doesn't count? then why cross it? One stroke a day, that could help.

Х as 8 as a math concept? or did they actually have 8-day week? 32 days per month? impossiburu.

I decided that I don't trust to common google information that one lunar month is 29.5 days, because it contradicted to 4 weeks are 28 days. and 28*13=364, which demanded an additional day (or 2 in a leap year) and Bj`o'rk said, that all women know they have a 28 day cycle, which makes it 13 months, but men needed 12 for some religious reasons (it's as if they exclude the Jesus himself out of their number?)
4 7 13 are interesting numbers because 1 and 10 make the sequence with them.
16 19 22 all have connection to alphabetic numerals (younger futhark, golden nuber of runic calendards, hebrew alphabet) and before that they were related to calendar? are those 4+7+13 the 24 of some alphabet? 25 with the 1?
5 vowels, 5 columns? We can build it out of english 26 (no Y?)

a b c d j (something like that was in ugaritic, I felt like it feets here the best, but could be а б в г д)
e f g h n (n is next to h (N is literally Н in russian) and n is both labial and lingual, like θ)
i m k l s (s like samekh, which gave birth to the name sigma, as some say)
o p q r t
u v x w z (w or y, some of those, thus I think the mess began when w became not ʃ but w)

was w ш?

I'm only modelling. Without authentic archaeologic findings it is merely speculations.
I hope I don't botch english more than necessary.

бв like её, ий, uvw

Was uvw-line pulled out of final V? whowever did it must have known of

z yx vwu tsr (q) ponml kjihg fe d cba

я сейчас как орешкин гадаю, блужаю в потьмах.

Но если ai, знающую все языки попросить раскатать алфавит вдоль и поперёк на разных языках по моему же принципу, то может какой-то вариант будет столь прост и ясен, что будет ясно - это оно.  Но я не знаком с таким ии

365 as IVXLCD as 1 4 8 32 64 256 but how would that be? 256 days are 4 64 cycles.
64 cycle is 2 32 cycles, thus 256days are 8 32day cycles, and the 1 4 8 32 64 before that are 3 13/32 cycles, thus not so. And I could look for some leap weeks, but either way 32day cycle doesn't make no sense, unless moon was moving slower in the past. which I doubt.

And mostly because of Bj`o'rks influence I looked into what is the actual length of month, and:

And in astrology they count the position of the moon in some celestial house, not the phases of it, which is weird in relation to what I said before, about C and D or something, either way common public only notices the synodic phases.

They say, Regardless of the culture, all lunar calendar months approximate the mean length of the synodic month, but can I really believe it? Especially since there are sidereal and tropical astrologies, but then those are to distinguish year, not month. I probably should contact Alexandra Elbakyan with my questions when I have them formed.

I always like name Михаил, seemed fit for such bear like me (no homo, but if I was, I'd be a bear) and now I notice that Mike Patton looks like me, and he made a hairdo I did, I'd like to contact him to tell not to have such hairdo, because it could be the reason my hair got off. But I don't wanna scare him before they did, and when he does, I'll know that it's from the braids, and I tell the world. Because Mike Patton has the best hair I know of.

And by the way he looks very much like me (even though usually he looks very different) I think that we're guested or hosted by the same ghost, the same demon, but if it's clear with me, my name is Dmitry and I'm usually know as dimon which is different in a stress, but french would probably pronounce that demon with the stress my name has. I'm demon, I like it, I listen to death metal, to black metal, to all that dark imagery of lYnch and horrors, and even comedies I like are horrific. I am demon, it is clear, and I have an excuse: I wish to end the war not to waste what we both may use for achieving something we don't want to do by ourself, maybe the other side wants to trade labours.

And now I see how Dmitry is also Mitya, which is pretty close to Miha, because х is h in russian and x was used for t in the past, both t & x were t's I think. but why is it h or ks now? were they all sh& sch and ск? but there's ks, not sk, dominatrix доминатрица, actress актрисса, empress императрица, dominatrix is доминатрикс, new words are new, no phonetic shift since then, and if ess becomes исса, then whether brits (or whoever brought that suffix) used more syllabic way to pronounce lonely consonants, or something happened in russia, where words have gender suffices, and thus they could add that a to show that it's a girl. Germans take sauna naked, both sexes together (I wonder why is that? from weimar liberation or from ancient times, they always saw it as normal? Historians contact me so we change this peace and promote more coherent picture of reality) and russians go naked only with lovers, otherwise men and women are separated. That could be connected to our grammar, though german language has gender articles (prefices)
And Michael is an angel, the godly might. and might is associated with a bear.
Bear is both a bear and carry, and carry is directly connected with might, mighty may.
Мишка мишка? Зойка зайка? Вовка вовк? вовк ис волк ин юкрэйниан

Лизка лиска? Лизочка лесичка? Лизочка Алисочка.

Люська лиска? ласка? людмила милый народ? людям лиса мила? лисоньки же мимими,

Medved-magazine uploaded that maedness, a nice coincidence, so it stays.
(also as an example of that dark imagery I prefer being a demon I am, and this world is full of angels and demons of all sorts who are all ought to coexist. pleasantly and productively and it would be great if production doesn' reduce the pleasantness part: no ecologic damage, no noise, no accidents)

Гуси, козы, коровы, лошади, кони, быки, свиньи, кабаны не имеют пар среди имёт.
Козлик Коля или Кузьма? Костя кот? кот коза козёл конь корова - ко у всех общее? ко как дом? ho in both house and home? use is vse (all in russian is vse, use as a variant) house is ho for everybody, home is ho for me. ho is cover? ho as hall? h is here? hall is here all? weak guess.
home dome are h and d similar? both are final in their lines, unless h is vowel? but it isn't in latin. and latin is a huge culture and great source for research.
A & V are not as we know them: we believe 🜂 to be yang, and thus male and 🜄 to be yin and thus female, but latin A stands for female and V for male suffices us and similar neutral suffix um, in russian grammar neutral suffix is closer to male, but I'm not sure of that: полотенце, млеко, both have final vowels, like female words tend to do, and male usually don't.

Let's collect all male words in russian that end with vowel:

Дима, Митя, Саня, Саша, Шура, Коля, Костя, Ваня, Серёжа, Женя, Валя,
да все эти простые имена и для женских и для мужских все силлабарные, гласные следовали за согласными, подзвучивали их. У всех этих емён строгие (полные) формы заканчиваются на согласную, у женских - на гласную. всегда.

In english is the same story: Jimmy, Johny, but James and John.

But if we go for 🜁 for A, then it's obvious, that the division is not between fire and water, but between air and solid: 🜁🜃🜂🜄 is the order where I found it, whether it's a coincidence or not it was weird to place dashed forms before purer ones, but it played perfectly here.
Air Earth Fire Water, are there third pair, because in english it's two vowels and two labials, two linguals are missing, or is it apopheny from me? I guess not. But until I occasionally meet 🜂🜄 crossed vertically, I leave this raw guess alive but not used.

and when I went to find triangles with vertical bar or something of the kind, I found glagolitic  Ⰴ Ⰲ

and if the glagolitic above don't look like thes signs, trust me, in other font they are the same:

And that Ⰴ is ascending and Ⰲ is descending makes sense, if they are 🜂 and 🜄
and 🜂 and 🜄 are naturally Δ and Υ or Δ and ν. Which Ⰴ and Ⰲ are.

🜁🜃🜂🜄 is this order legic or accidental? 🜁 for A standing first reflects abcd great, but.. now I see..

🜁🜄🜂🜃 must be the actual order: female first inside, male first outside: air above water, fire before earth.
A B D E earth has cognate in bibleic hebrew, D like fire? З or even Ж would be good, but is it?
B for Water and Boда is great. A can also be aether, which is эфир in russian, and is эфир alphabetic itself? or is it nothing?
AVΔe? a V Δ e?
earth as element per se? neither wateh and fire alone, that's air, probably water and fire was understood first among elements and earth was both water and fire: soil can produce both wet mud and burning trees. But air is also a combination of water and fire: שָׁמַיִם and all I can see is 🜃 must be that combination in other order: water triangle is drawn before fire triangle, of which only the first stroke shown. And there thus should be a word in hebrew for soil, similar to maimash.
מימש is realized, actualize, execute, effect, which is good, but not what I was looking for.
ארץ is the word opposing שָׁמַיִם in bible.
I wonder why both arabs and jews have d and r so similar, and why г is similar to r? and why g is to russian d? Were they all the same letter before they were splat: ᚦ as all Г, Д, Р, К, R? I'm lost but R and P should be in one band, and though that P was russian Р, it is still vague to say.

a b cd
o p qrst
in russian b divided into бв, but it's uncommon, usually linguals split, but what if P = R?
Where r is г? It would be great Г П Т or П Г Т which is more BCD-like.
but that's so raw it's almost (most likely) wrong

I thought of how sound side of numbers could be related to numeral value of the letters, and I went:
А-n (odin, one)
dVa tWo
ᚦee (three, tree, три)
4 as y? because 5 is пять and five, very labial, thus 4 must be vowel, even if that's some scholastics.
5 as п or f only make sense to me, if it's 8 as some ancient f
6 would make great s, not only by its shape I noticed, but to my surprise both six and shest are fit.
7 is then t - it's easy to imagin t's dash the same 7's dash not present in this font.
Then we get the 8-tet again. восьмеричная система. если X = 8, то и позиционная система пр которую мы знаем могла быть восьмеричной, и подобно тому как в десятеричной системе 9 - самая крупная цифра, так и 7 вполне мог быть таковой в восьмеричной.
and I wonder if V follows T because it's old form of 4. What I thought to be Y is V, makes lots of sense.
nd allows  me to try to reconstruct the ancient 8.. it's named octal.. What a name!

It has been suggested that the reconstructed Proto-Indo-European word for "nine" might be related to the PIE word for "new". Based on this, some have speculated that proto-Indo-Europeans used an octal number system, though the evidence supporting this is slim.[Winter, Werner (1991). "Some thoughts about Indo-European numerals". In Gvozdanović, Jadranka (ed.). Indo-European numerals. Trends in Linguistics. 57. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 13–14. ISBN 3-11-011322-8]

English units was already, to a remarkable extent, an octal system.

In the mid-19th century, Alfred B. Taylor concluded that "Our octonary [base 8] radix is, therefore, beyond all comparison the "best possible one" for an arithmetical system." The proposal included a graphical notation for the digits and new names for the numbers, suggesting that we should count "un, du, the, fo, pa, se, ki, unty, unty-un, unty-du" and so on, with successive multiples of eight named "unty, duty, thety, foty, paty, sety, kity and under." So, for example, the number 65 (101 in octal) would be spoken in octonary as under-un.[8][9] Taylor also republished some of Swedenborg's work on octal as an appendix to the above-cited publications.

? voised and voiceless halves?? S as Six? T as 7? T is literally ᛐ
VPST vier is uier?
T is X?
VPSX? I thought X was 8, not 7. Did  it go with a step of three? A V X?
Roman numeral I is ا?
A W T almost A M T (but of course this coincidence doesn't make it more true than it is)
And I had this question in another context: is X 7 or 8?

Are actors often homos, because you have to like getting the make-up on.
Good morning, Dima's back. Why do I apply to me the form with -a?  Because I like it more.
In english a can easily be in male words: killer, warrior, basta
was basta rhymes a rip-off of odb? at least in the name, but he also was a more glamour version of odb who was awesome but off the formats. off the formants. off the radio.

R and D reflect each other in k-symmetry, close semantically: right & dexter.
But in regenerate and degenerate they're the opposites.
And if prefixes maybe inverted in suffixes, we get
generator and generated. Generator is to (re)generate, generated without outside help can only degenerate, as if't's not self-sustained.
-er and -ed are re- and de-?
let's test this guess more:
reform is not former, but new (or is it new, because it's not latter. all new is well-forgotten old, now it at least makes sense, a deeper sense, though "all" part is wrong there. Maybe it's all they have, because they're not napoleos, they cannot invent. The normal people create language? I thought poets did? There are plenty poets among normal people, good poets may fancy public, which he then can use as his instrument.

reply plier? плоскогубец? pliers could be the inventor's name. (to ply is курсировать, усердно работать, лавировать, какое интересное слово! тот, кто любит свою рабту, наверное, лавирует между столами, между покупателями, между рабочими с тележкой щебня какого-нибудь, so was reply лавирование меж вопросами or responsiveness to the clients? You reply to those you love, unless you don't want to be with her for whatever reasons. Or is it only my cope, because I knew that if she sees how scared I am, what a coward I am, only because I saw the wish of scum to destroy me physically, so I didn't give them chance, being a smart kid I forsaw the worst possible event, and cowed out. Are domestic animals smart? Nope, they're just adequate to their abilities)

R and D
revolution (but the opposie of devolution is evolution, but regenerate ~ generate, re is an redundant suffix, because when you do it what does it matter if you do it again or anew?
revolutions were before, but they're needed to go further, but if we understand evolution as sequences of revolutions and allow peaceful transitions, we ca n  make it without rya of war carnage.

carnage is cutting ножи? knife нож knighe? g~h and f is double г, which can be used to transliterate both. lauгг? г is middle form and h is the final? is h just staved form of г?

how can г relate to г (even when one is cursive, even italic, form of the other)
if both are two ways to dray crescent. г is the upper contour, as if the upper end could go all the way down to close the contour, and г is just the form of crescent in one stroke? as a possibility.

It was not just first guess, I conceptualized C as crescent before, the
gibbous moons can also be recognized as С or Р (стареющая или растущая)

Mnemonic devices for luna phases are DOC (russians don't have D, so we use the Р, a staved form of some mythic Ɔ whic stands for O, which stands right by P, and thus I think staved and staveless forms stand nearby not by accidence, and thus D is staved form of C? I'm getting even more confused (or the opposite of that) when I notice, that S of Ξ or ס or س stands before Ο or ע or ع.
Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ but the closest to us that has that S recognizes P as R & П is the P.
РС is how it goes in russian (they're how they put down RS, the exactly same pair, even though russians are taught to pronounce R coronally, but I use uvular form of it and am speak standard russian, standart, outstanding art should be the standard, thus it's standart. выстоявшее искусство, доказавшее свою целостность в какой-то катастрофе?

French mnemonic devise is Premier Dernier:

thus b & d could be the phases, and c would have nothing to do but to be the full moon.
In russian it's абвгд, and between b & c в would be great vollmond. mond is mouth in dutch. moon is maan daar. volle maan. as if man is as much of a satelite as moon is.
a cheshire smile

If at first there were CD, then we need to introduce some letter between them to denote the newmoon, but only ugaritic has such letter of all I know.
and then B for fullmoon would be great before C and A would be the D moon again. But I never heard of any letter between C & D in latin. But let's guess they never were denoting new moons, premier would be their new ones,  then alphabet divides into groups by three, which I think I noticed in the very start, in big brown history notebook. notebook is for notes? these are also notes, even though not always musical. ABC EFG HIJ - broken already, it should be HIK LMN (these also don't look very fit, because N reflects L in hebrew cursive form of נ, but crescents go the opposite direction, as if this triple is supposed to be read from right to left. from N to L, nml.. I doubt it.
And thus that guess of alphabet as lunar calendar goes to waste, it would never have enough letters for such trick. But 26 is half the 52, hardly it is an accident. Is it the deck with only two seasons? 4 suits of a deck, 4 seasons of a year. Half a year in one alphabet, and it just goes twice? with a stroke above the other time? Two seasons like Water and Fire or Air and Earth, either way four-fold began as two-fold.
A2345678910JQK Is it the dirty dozen, because they introduced Q between J&K for pornographic reasons? Карты с дамами шулерские, чтоб игрок отвлекался на их перси вместо того чтоб следить за игрой? Were they A23456789JK? Or was J the I and some θ were there after h?
Is Q female form of K? Was c s before they invented k? was g ж? or was г ж and instead of g there was z? then it would also be ж before з as in russian.
If A to K is the deck, LMN would make perfect beginning of the second half of the alphabet (they're famous as such in an etymology of the word element) but O as double A and the begining of voiceless counterparts of the first half makes more sense.
O23456789XYZ where Y looks as out of its place as Q did.
I didn't work with it before, I had no idea X Y Z would go right after 9, which looks like cursive shin and stands for W which is closest to the form of ש which stands second from the end, just like Y which is related to it, and ת can sound as lingual θ which makes it more similar to Z, and ר has nothing in common with X, and W stands before it, doesn't has much to do with ק only if the way Q reflects Y which reflects W the way I described. And whether it some magic or poetry or accident, it's fascinating and can be used in some artform for posthumans.

все.м мы все.мы в сей, мы в каком-то помещении, поле, вот это мы. on? all! in this we all we oh oui
o! is good? a is baad? go & ba (be) bad be? why not it go like govno, and jam is the opposite of shit in some russian proverbial curse rhyme (а нам всё равно что повидно что говно) some wicked meme.
good sounds alsome almost like круто in goed. and круто is next to хорошо ( brackets are newmoons)

so good is what goes,
What goes here is translated by google translator as оно идёт сюда (thus not goes but comes, come is redundant because go means do,  go on! да вай!

X is 10 when it's convenient, huh?

5 for S is awesome, 5 is E and in light of Σ it's also awesome.
4 for Δ and Д is also great, D reflecting R is also awesome.
3 for Q show it as C. But I wonder why Daleth cursive looks like 3. Because B is the first letter, Beth-Luis-Nion. MLN, I suppose. N is nasal vowel, and Samekh and Ayn, or directly O after N make NSO one claster? and of so?
Beth-Luis-Nion are B Г Д, vowels follow. But in ogham it's F, But the name Beth-Luis-Nion tells, that it used to be only three stroke max. And only one of the following three is original. N it was. as the name tells. And in the other two or three staven?

oh my god, this link leads to something incredible: The White Goddess by Robert Graves. I even bought that book in paper, and I don't read it to be independent as a researcher. I think I know enough now, so I can read it and compare his thought against mine and maybe to ingrane his thought into mine.
And here he modifies ogham the context of which you may read clicking the previous image.

Previous image leads to an important piece:
 философ Деметрий, живший в Александрии в первом веке до нашей эры, описав в своем труде «О стиле» элизию гласных[161] и хиатус[162] и сообщив, что с «элизией стих становится скучнее и менее мелодичным», иллюстрирует преимущества хиатуса следующим образом:

    В Египте жрецы поют гимны богам, произнося последовательно семь гласных, что производит такое же сильное музыкальное впечатление на слушателей, как если бы играли флейта и лира. Если не использовать хиатус, то и язык перестанет быть мелодичным и гармоничным. Но, пожалуй, лучше мне не развивать эту тему дальше в сложившейся ситуации.

Он не говорит, что это за жрецы и к каким богам они обращались, но нетрудно угадать, что это были боги семидневной недели, в том числе единое трансцендентное божество, и что гимн состоял из семи гласных, которые Симонид включил в греческий алфавит, и имел врачующее действие.

And the fact that five notes predated seven notes, and five vowels predated seven vowels, allows me to conclude that there were only five days in a week, and it could be because 365 immediately divides only into 5. and boring 73. I know nothing of 73.
 In English, it is the smallest natural number with twelve letters in its spelled out name.
the 21st prime number.
a star number.

but while I linked that book in russian, allow me to start a new thread about that very book:
notes on The White Goddess A Historical Grammar by Robert Graves.
(the book itself mirrored)

In vol.1 I quoted academia: " Dongba is largely a mnemonic system, and cannot by itself represent the Naxi language; different authors may use the same glyphs with different meanings, and it may be supplemented with the geba syllabary for clarification."
And that "mnemonic system" part is most probably bs, caused by somebody unable to learn the system or by chinese propaganda, actively destoying that culture.
different authors may use the same glyphs with different meanings

can be countered with alphabetic example of |, used for both I & l and if we go beyond latin (who knows maybe there were more than one dongba-based writing system) then it's also a in arabic, and both v & n in hebrew, which is fascinating, because both v & n merge in the form of v (greek ν)
and Λ thus meets V in that l form next to the ו
But that hook in ו could reflect ל but there's not such hook in the cursive forms of ו or ן
It's as if | and ✓ were the same, as if ✓ was a \ with a straight swash.
that ✓ is probably left handed. right handed tick (check) would probably also be like that if drawn from the bottom up. some people write so, and then / would just be a swashless (swift) checkmark.
like v is greek Ν and נ looks like reversed L when in cursive (and hebrews also write the other way around)

Сейчас отправил письмо патриотичному телезрителю, оно интересно.
Сейчас заметил, что Россия и Америка имеют похожие не только имена (rUSsiA, USSR, USA US SU) похожие, но и сокращения по одному принципу имеют и двухбуквенные и трёхбуквенные сокращения: US USA RU RUS (NL & GB так не могут)
И пошёл дальше: прочёл эти сокращения US (буквально us, ас, что переводится как нас, но иногда на русский переводятся как мы (английская и русская грамматика слегка отличается "it's us" = "это мы") RU читается по буквам (spells) как "are you" and "are you?" переводится на русский "чё серьёзно?" (буквально "есть (ли) вы?" где есть служебная частица (i am a scientist = я есть один учёный - так у них говорят (слова короткие, потому что у нас один в виде суффикса идёт слеплено со следующим словом)
RUS and как будто во множественном числе "те кто "are you?""
Мы самой грамматикой (гримуар - родственное слово) вынуждены быть противопоставлены, Россия не ведущая держава, но держава постоянно бросающая вызов. Оппонент в этом общем движении (кто-то воспринимает это танцем, кто-то - схваткой, остаётся надеяться, что мы переростаем подростковый период цивилизации и нам уже не нужно мутузить друг друга как бестолковым школярам чтоб доказать кто здесь круче, можно наверное по взрослому начинать все эти вопросы решать. Нам учиться и не обращать внимания на других успешных, или стремиться подружиться с ними, а уж точно не вынашивать планы убийства, которым постоянно угрожать, как обезьяна с дубиной (подросткам такое поведение простительно, взрослым - нет)

The Sideways I ꟷ is an epigraphic variant of Latin capital letter I used in early medieval Celtic inscriptions from Wales and southwest England (Cornwall and Devon). About 36 monumental inscriptions in Wales, and about 15 in Cornwall and Devon, mostly dating from the 5th-6th centuries, make use of this letter. Except for a single inscription from the Isle of Man, it is not found in monumental inscriptions elsewhere. The letter is used exclusively in a word-final position for Latin words (or Latinized Celtic names) in the second declension genitive singular.[1]

and with such info why would we divide H from I claster? H is literally И in old russian.
H is vowel in greek, and presence of labial Θ shows that those apollo priests wanted to add whole line to vowel H?

EZ reflects russian second line, ЕЁЖЗ, where Ё was added later as a form of E. and Ж is ž, З is z.
And russians have Η Θ  in addition to already messy I-line.

But what if I was z.. a sideways H was recognized as Z in phoenician script:

but back to russians:

If we consider Η vowel, Θ labial, Ι lingual, then we get ourselves

Value     Greek     Cyrillic
    1         Αʹ         А
    2         Βʹ         В
    3         Γʹ         Г
    4         Δʹ         Д
    5         Εʹ         Е
    6     Ϛʹ or Ϝʹ     Ѕ
    7         Ζʹ         З
    8         Ηʹ        И
    9         Θʹ        Ѳ
    10        Ιʹ         І
    20        Κʹ        К
    30        Λʹ       Л
    40        Μʹ      М
    50         Νʹ     Н
    60         Ξʹ     Ѯ
    70         Οʹ     О
    80         Πʹ     П
    90         Ϟʹ     Ч or Ҁ
    100       Ρʹ     Р
    200       Σʹ     С
    300       Τʹ     Т
    400       Υʹ     У or Ѵ
    500       Φʹ     Ф
    600       Χʹ     Х
    700       Ψʹ     Ѱ
    800       Ωʹ     Ѡ
    900       Ϡʹ     Ц or Ѧ

If we phonetize old russian alphabet like this:
We get ourselves three unequal rows, that demand simplifying ГД into one godly deity of g
S as f? so or similarly, like w, it is believed to be sounding in greek Ϛ where that letter came from.
It's literally Ϛʹ or Ϝʹ there.

If we phonetize old russian alphabet like this:
we get ourselves almost symmetric scale, which demands wheterh Ѕ or И to be out. And ГД as 2 letters.

Either way it's 9-letter scale, as old decimal system, shown above, demands for a cycle to be.
(I chose to remove H because of it's possible vowelness, and because
I would expect to see A I V as the three vowels. And probably it was so, then O would reflect E as > reflects < and they're placed in alphabet in sucha way that it is mathematically accurate, if we take alphabet as description of human age, beginning as a baby, and ending with a tott.
And now let's see if it's accurate in numerologic sense.
The table above tells that PQRST equal 770, which is larger than 255, but that could not be right, because there T is not in the 100 position. Or is it even supposed to be in the 90?
Italian alphabet places it there:
AB C D< F G H I  L  M  N  >  P   Q  R  S  T
1 2  3 4 5 6  7  8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
and now 350.. is still larger than than the rest, which comes naturally, but could be a surprise.
It wheterh wasn't used in such a way, or this < > thing came from some earlier fairytale.

And I recall that octomal fairytail:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
1 2 3 4 5 6 7  8  16 24 32 40 48 56
1 to 40 would thus make 108 which would make less than 104 of 48 and 56 combined,
thus > is at the position of 50(40)
And it would make sense, that at the age of 4 or so you learn to compare 10 to 100s and at the age of that 40 or 50 you can compare things up to 5 percent accuracy.
And that 8-digit system would make sense, if people could show in fingers, thumbs are short for that, and they are even named differently in english.

Let's go further in that octomal theory and see if at some point they add up to something meaningful
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 1000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7  8  16 24 32 40 48 56  64  128 192 256 320 384 448 516

1 3 6 10 15 21 28 36 52 76 108 148 196 252 316 444 636 892 1212 (here my computational power crashed and I, tired, had to take a calculator. I surely am not used to count in numbers) 1596 2044 2560

But that is what octomal numbers equal in decimal, so I understand their meaning, but both awesome 444 and 636 are something else in octomal.

and I go where I left that idea of IVXLCD adding up to 365 if X is 8
and I found this:

It is funny that the only three vowels drawn differently in russian are sorta related (У ~ Ч ~ Ц)
учц учиться?
I know that all these letters had many unlikely forms, but I work with this set, wherever the roots of that notion of УЧЦ comes from in it: the actual historic canon, the subconscious urge to учиться of the person who compiled it (now I see that person is as sexist as he) or his poetic plot, or an accident.

If there were round yurtas instead of square walls, then it makes sense why IVXLCD of octobon system octagon system, not decimal, because mal is bad.
Г = Б? Again? Г = Б.
государство есть безопасность? так оно задумывалось, но столь успешно, что теперь оно само представляет опасность для своих граждан.
ᚹ wanna ᚹ гонна В = Г too, because Б = Г.
БГ и ГБ как антиподы советских времён. Я just had urge 

wanna and gonna are will, what we will and what will come.
come is go me to me
to do go can be cognates if grammar is more primitive.
ko is also one of them, because to is ко in russian, к is both k & c.
and all these cognates. except w.

but if б = г, then what's the difference? are all short consonants cognate?

Не проходьте повз! Sounds in urkeinian and we're uralic, we're their natural ally against moscow. Because moscow oppresses us and Kyiv doesn't.
russian patriots laugh that it looks like Хуев, but brutal truth is Кий could be related to хуй, just as удочка is to уд. уд a'nd ху two memes in different dialects became stylistic forms of the same thing in russian. As if it used to be худ. Художник родственно ли этому слову. От какого слова может происходить художжник? не может быть, чтоб его в каком-то иде не сохранилось. Painter. Drawer, Draw близко к гравировать, paint палитра, но даже менее близко, пятно! пятно родственно слову пятка? пытать? пятна points пнутое. пинать от пята пи пятка на носок пина гипотетическое слово для ноги? спина родственно этому слову? с пина, спина с ног начинает рости. пина bottom? back в ass? back пачка pack.  Надо поразбирать человеческий таз, пачкой ли там слои костной ткани. Или pack это plank?
Why do I mess where ai can do the work better faster. And I must whether brings only ideas for ai, or to focus on immortality module.

Walls won because they're safer and real estate, not some movable property. Why would nomad houses be considered less ground for the private property of land. Because their horses need to move? Because they're easier to move.

Majestic mad жестик

As an illustration of how much d and g could be the same letter or the same sound, skugge is shadow

I wanted to sub ахсимсз with subtitles like this, because it's easier than to dub.
d as golos and s as script? I would ratianlize s and d as speak and draw if it was the other way around, so that is whether apophenia or some other poetic bs. poetic is music? so don't be rude. даже если кто-то из фей является божьей коровкой. как Маринет.
and of course I was not the first to think about it, even though for few moments I sought I thourht thought I was.

I had a good conversation about science, and it is better than science committee,

And now some attic numerals:

Detail of stela showing tributes paid by allies of Athens in the League of Delos. The amounts are in Attic numerals, using the drachma sign "𐅂" instead of the geenric unit sign "Ι". Some amounts are "𐅄" = 50, "ΗΗΗ" = 300, "𐅅ΗΗΗ" = 800, "ΔΔΔ𐅂𐅂𐅂" = 33, "Χ" = 1000, and "Χ𐅅𐅄Δ𐅂𐅂"? = 1562?.

The Attic numerals used the following main symbols, with the given values:
Value     Symbol     Talents     Staters     Notes                                               Etruscan     Roman
1               Ι                                             Tally mark?                                                    𐌠             I
5              Π                 𐅈           𐅏           Old Greek: ΠΕΝΤΕ [pɛntɛ] Modern: πέντε             𐌡            V
10            Δ                 𐅉            𐅐          Old Greek: ΔΕΚΑ [deka] Modern: δέκα                  𐌢            X
50            𐅄                𐅊            𐅑         "Δ" in "Π": 10 × 5 = 50                                       𐌣            L
100          Η                𐅋            𐅒         Old Greek: ΗΕΚΑΤΟΝ [hɛkaton] Modern: εκατό                      C
500          𐅅                𐅌            𐅓         "Η" in "Π": 100 × 5 = 500                                    ?             D
1000        Χ                𐅍            𐅔         Old Greek: ΧΙΛΙΟΙ [kʰilioi] Modern: χίλιοι                ?           
5000        𐅆                𐅎                        "Χ" in "Π": 1000 × 5 = 5000                                  ?           
10000      Μ               𐅕                        Old Greek: ΜΥΡΙΟΙ [myrioi] Modern: μύριοι            ?          
50000      𐅇                𐅖                        "Μ" in "Π": 10000 × 5 = 50000                              ?    
The fractions "one half" and "one quarter" were written "𐅁" and "𐅀", respectively.

Roman thousands  were marked with the horizontal tally marks above them.
If etruscan only had 𐌠 𐌡 𐌢 𐌣 then the cultuure before them must have had only I V
v before x could make a good story of two v combined becoming a tradition of x,

Vier being Пять reveals r and ть as the same lingual morpheme.
some proto-ᚦ the for example, or to as ть is.
I just was revealed how to make poetry:
make each sentence take its line
then we don't need dots.

and it further revealed paw as path.

лапа probably inverts into paw soehow,
is it pala or la pas?
one thought per paragraph
one blocklet per a thought

one line per sentence

If I is ein, V is vier, X must be ten? zehn!
X sounds as Z sometimes, so it's close.
and it again raises a problem of DF S being T and c being d
but then b is also c because of how b & d are similar.
as foot and hand, 𓃀 and 𓂧.
they both were paws? when п was л.
п thus paw, лапа
л is ладонь, длань. l as h? why not leg?
leg is the whole лапа.
foot is пята, путь, path, pes (pedagogue is believed to be etymologically from that word, but it's a misconception: paedogogus is lating ofrm and it's the same ae as in paedophile. And it explains the alternative spelling: with ae is the latin term, pedophile is the english standart. I keep on writing standard as standart it seems natural to my hands to write it this way, thus standart it is.
The way I set my own standart here: it's not d, it's t? art is done, set. ard is operated. but in that context standard is done with, it's standard of the past, and thus it's standart. art as fac'd. as there are fact and fucked. fact is what happened and fucked can be is fucked.
If I placed is fucked in italic, it is cursive, because it felt deep, so I unitalized it.

Italy I tell ya.
USA you ass hey!
USA you a say.
US is directly us.
(the collective of people, so general government will be on the basis of US. as it is in UN now)

UN has Hitler's fringe in the right side of N
US has ass in its name, som a so may be  maybe so m
so maybe it's US turn into, merge into UN?
Does UN have power over US? Some events showed that they don't.

S even looks like an ass. a naked as.
T is both trup i dung? dirt. топь. трясина трясёт ся.
тряса она? праведна пра веды она? я думал правды она. ведать знать.
I must learn to break the thoughts if I don't want commas

Я хочу знать как жить.
Я хочу быть успешным бизнесменом.
Но я вынужден заниматься наукой.
И это мой долг.
Шудры    рабы своих тупых желаний.
Кшатрии    лишь ключевые шудры, с которыми вообще имеет смысл дела иметь.
Брахманы    подчиняют себе сиюминутные желания ради великой цели.
Как брахман подчиняет себе
Как брахман выбирает цели? Они появляются в его жизни зачастую помимо его воли? Нет, брахманы хотят быть брахманами. Хотят всё-всё знать. И те три брата в типа-рамаяна это брахман что ушёл в горы чтоб всё знать (брахману положено бессмерие. это радует)  затем брат который стал воителем, и третий брад спящий. когда спящий проснётся можно (возможно, я не читал) аттрибутировать сюда (я видел коммент под типа-рамаяной, кто-то ттак и сделал.
Кшатрии служат. Кшатрии ключевые шудры, потому что они связующее звено между просветлёнными и скотиной, ибо есть те кто видят, есть те кто видят когда показывают и те кто не видят. это и есть три касты. shudras are dark as night and kshatrii is knight.

Я считаю разумным удовлетворит то желание (мне это не будет многого стоить) чтоб быть удовлетворённым, довольным жизнью, а то чего это у меня всё есть, а я всё недоволен.
Я хочу капсулу, я уже не хочу ничего кроме капсулы? почти что так,
я богат и без бизнеса, но капсула это больше чем бизнес.
Наука изобрела мне капсулу.
Composer глючит чтоб я писал автоматически, не глядя в экран.
и получается отлично.

то магия, возможно, channeling, proper channeling wil be when I will be able to go astral and keep my fingues typing. Yeah, that I'm looking for.
But who will read it, we have to record astral directly. And it will be done soon. I saw peopole working on it. (o's are when I stumbled and when I tried to control the process, my fingers knew orthography beter than the controlledr.  - d was written by fingers, r brought in that controlling module in my head.
thus r and d are semantically opposed. -er is active. -ed is passive.
baby being passive is natural, d is 4, after I (after a kid understands what he wants he and she are two readings of the same Ⱶ and I wonder why there are four unicodes for that instead of two ͰͱⱵⱶ and I guess it's because first half is ancient from soem ꟷ texts, and the second half is modern Η Ⱶ similar to h and thus Hh is the most univesal forms)

Тот кто просит prays and praises.
Православные славят "слава богу"
Протестатные благодарят "thank god"
Правые за соблюдения их права
Левые за being left alone?
It used to be the casu until jews were allowed into politics.
casu instead of case is how my fingers typed it and let it be the way the y want it to be

I pondered the other day and saw that there are only two basic vowels:
a and o don't palatalize the previous consonant (the syllabic principle)

pure пью питьевая

trouble turbulence tour-буль to-crush-and-sink?

I sent the cree star diagram to Wim as a birthday present. And as usually in such cases, the more I share the more I get:

(I will mirror when I edit it in a shorter form)

I have spoeke spoken before on why cree writing systems existed before christians,
and here it shows how similar it is to the writing systems we use in Europe,
in a way no christian would fathom.
The first and second videos demonstarte two separate settings, they relate to each other in the sense of vowels, in vocalism, but they both demonstare principles present in european alphbaets, but differently, on different levels, you'll see in a moment:
Both structures he've shown (and he relates to it to something sacred, not mentioning no christians (and if it was a christian structure, why wouldn't he give it in the form of crosses? only because he didn't know of this diagram) omit the external garbage that image above them includes, and it makes the resemblane between them and the european alphabets more lucid:

First video:
A reflects O, E reflects I (even though that image above recognizes as I & E what this man obviously reads as E & EE (and O is AA in ogham and danish))
Consonants go in the order they place them in europe: ABD, or OPT, whichever way you look at them. wA is a dotted A and even that is placed not to breaking the structure of vowel, labial, lingual.

Second video:
M as the first letter! it is fascinating from two perspectives: B as the first letter. as the video goes on you can see that order is BCDE, as I suggested it could be. And M is the proto-B then, because the order before A was introduced (as is reported in King Jesus by Robert Graves and in other instances: a cabbalist told so. many holy books begin with b. b d as the universal counterposition and a reflects d so much that it could reflect b the way d does, and it is a raw part, I have to cook it yet.) is more in the past (it's almost not seen from the modern european perspective)
A & O oppose eachother again, but in another level: they are named low-tongue-raisers in russian philology, and they are placed in the lower part of the diagram.
E & I oppose each other again, but they're also both named high-tongue-raisers in russian philology (I took freedom to translate it in my own style, but they're named close vowel in standard terms, but also high vowel in american terminology. A & O are named open or low vowels. That could be an argument towards european roots of the structure, as if an european did create it. But that is countered with the fact that such exact positioning of sounds was not known in europe and that if they repeated european order, as would be natural for them to, they would make it more explicit, and instead we have resemblances which can only be explained or even detected only with knowing my work, and christians have shown in armenian alphabet that they don't have a clue))
I have a job to finish this review, but I think you can see it for yourself, I will return to it. For now short:
mn sequence, the second half of the alphabet (could that christian know of the second half? Then he would place it as LMN sequence, but it seems (according to the videos) that L is what was added after that traditional sequence the videos represent. Together with K R J which natuarally was for Jesus Christ? Because cree phonetics is all weird and doesn't seem to be including the sonors. And it correlates the fact that I-line is out of order. (the thought which lead out of here was raw and related L
It's incredible, but there's no k in traditional lines. But if I look carefully upon the videos, we may notice that they include JQ in the canon:

who writes Christ over q? Could it be that cree people asked missionaries what letters they had for k sound and chose q as related to their own forms the most (for C was taken, and K twoo weird and akr-wrd. is ok in okolnikov for awk? Is it hawk? сокольников? Кто-нибудь использовал ястребов вместо соколов? скорей всего это диалектные синонимы, сейчас смотрел охоту с ястребом, я бы не отличил её от охоты с соколом. Подозреваю, что сокол мощней. немношк, и не всегда, одинаковые)
And thus that was what how christians managed to declare cree writings their own, to usurp it, to absorb it into their petty christian wordl.
I claim, that diagonal lines also had 4 letters before chrisians, and t in ther only plays that english also can here rat in it.
This 4-line diagonal hypothesis is supported by the fact that those four are the common order in those lines. So I combine it so to recognize

And what I see in those diagonals is that very M-line with some Y inserted between נ and ס.
And if we look once again at the order from the video we can see, that that Y, even though that ipa's j is й and could be considered a consonant, the syllables it make are perfectly vowel and thus perfect to end as BCDE according to what I said before. And now I notice that thus both straight lines and the diagonal lines have their vowels, only simple vowels go first and йотированные гласные идут в конце, как многие  в русском алфавите.

Almost none of the cree set reminds russian or english signs of corresponding meaning, maybe ᓴ and ᓭ remind S a little, whatever it could be, still the 8th part of them all, it takes some imagination to correspond ᔭ to y. But the additional jo ke ri seem to come directly from european J q r. Of those signs only ᒍ and ᑫ is present. J Q that were also presented in the video. For whatver reason they decided not to inclurde in this sen those ri's and лi's
     a     e     i     o
-     ᐊ     ᐁ     ᐃ     ᐅ
p     ᐸ     ᐯ     ᐱ     ᐳ
t     ᑕ     ᑌ     ᑎ     ᑐ
k     ᑲ     ᑫ     ᑭ     ᑯ
ch     ᒐ     ᒉ     ᒋ     ᒍ
m     ᒪ     ᒣ     ᒥ     ᒧ
n     ᓇ     ᓀ     ᓂ     ᓄ
s     ᓴ     ᓭ     ᓯ     ᓱ
y     ᔭ     ᔦ     ᔨ     ᔪ

That cree structure also shows, that America is connected to Europe and not Asia (or they would place K first, and yet what interesing is the korean K, their first consonant resembles cree first consonant, even though it sounds completely different, as if they had some common structure, but because of the difference in their languages they read it differently.

But then again it could be a coincidence, just as their N looking like cursive נ, and I as I. and also J and π and cursive r maybe. and t. and other runic forms of ᛆᚿᚮ don't really correlate. So I draw the line here and say that korean probably relate to some chinese signs. and if those chinese signs relate to european, that I have to research when I get a chinese module to my head.

If M ~ П then not only muses are pussies, but пузо could be related to pussy.
(it could sounds as  a blasphemy, but it was revealed to me after I thought about my weird religious lifestory and that the affection to muses is the only one I had in my heart all the time)

if A and E counterpositioned,
it's because E palatalizes consonants and A doesn't.
And in this sense A and O is one side of the vowels and E and I is the other one.
U is in between as Y because U is ju and maybe even и sometimes.
But english e is э
and O is close to U
Is it why..
Does this later vowel break this early system and that's why we don't know of it.&?
Looking at artificial structure as if it was a natural one and theorists only described it allowed to later theorists (the theorists who came after that, the new theorists) to reconceptualize the structure and thus to break its symmetry. So those who 've built aeiou structure whether dismanteled the more simple ones or they have rather reconstructed the structuralism including the letters that were out of it. by introducing q and x? q qourd be a form of c, ч, ц standing before q in hebrew.
I'm only guessing here, I told you it was a draft. Philosophers don't need erasers, espeially when they allow their mistakes to be revealed, to see how we think so you can too.
But what is the mechanism of our thought? Grammar of sentences demand us to choose words, and how do we choose? Let's think about it while we speak. The whole sentence semantically appears before I write it, so thoughts come in no-verbal fors, like flashes, of images. Let's try to catch that .. those flashes. I felt the vector (force) towards that idea of flash, as if it was my nervous cell rushing towards the cell she recognized as flashes, as if I whether placed the previous text in some cell or it was there forever, and previous sentence came to me in flash also, as if (I guess by knowledge not feeling) several cells contacted me, makeing a complex feature of their components. Then that was in therm even then.

And now my task is to go further into this, because I didn't fake, I actually felt it.
But I'm tired of licking my own tongue, will return to it later. And now let's take it n the

Funk is not some euphemism of fuck, it's not flexia in english, it's more likely somebody with sperm on face and even in nose saying we're fucking and getting we're funking instead.

What cell structure could observe how the neurons fire eachother? The fired neurons themselves could report of it. It looked as if I was inside of the fired neurons that received that idea. The one that asked it? Was it a neuron or a structure? Looked like one neuron as they draw then, inside the ball one side of which kinda lightern up. Does this typo shows how lantern appeared?


Look so natural to me, as it comes from the hight to the depth. and I is in the middle, which makes sense if Angel is abouv and deWill is the low.

a bove? ab ove?
the low? be law?
a bove a bow a vow?
Λow ad Vow, now it makes perfect sense.
Our vows are above the laws, that's for sure.

Do I vow to live forever? Do I "Wow! I live forever!"
Is Pelevin's never say wow is biblaic don't vow.
do not swear an oath at all (even though I took it out of context, that's how people take it, short)
oath is owe's what is ought. I spoke about it, I forgot of oath then, add it to that.

I go all the way Wo! I live forever!
I don't know who is Wo (that's a typo) but that's the same Wo I have in WooDeeMann.
Woo is Voodoo, and it could be the rememberance of that basal BD

And such orthography make it directly related to ведун and Wotan.
Also the word веды comes out as something alphabetic.

And I tried to find some veda, and I chose: rigveda, ayurveda may also be in book, I never thought of what is the ayurveda's main text. There must be. And even though rigeda came to me as the firs association, I don't think common public knows this word. Ayur is also an alphabetic word. Rig is not. Unless R is vowel and as in India and g is k the way they start their consonant row. Okay I will look into Rigveda too. To ee if it begins with b too.

Rig is probably reich, reiner's book? Ayurveda is more brachmic. Rigveda is kshatrian? I think I read it and it begins with a war scene.

Why I make such guesses? I consider all the gueses valuable. It is a draft. It is an online draft, but a draft never the less.

I istor
U ustye

Asuras in hinduism and Ahura Mazda could be the reason beyond the division between h & s, and thus c & d, s & t, and thus maybe qrst as four different sounds? Was it some common trick they used to pacify the religious conflicts when one nation considered the deity of their neighbours for satan, which is translated as foe, and it was natural whne nations were in conflict.

And I recognized ahura as asura correctly:

Асуры (от санскр. и пали «असुर» (asura IAST), тиб. ལྷ་མ་ཡིན་ (, кит. 阿修羅/阿修罗 (āxiūluo)), также Дайтьи (Daityas — «потомки Дити»)[1], — в индуизме низшие божества, называющиеся также демонами, титанами, полубогами, антибогами, гигантами, и находящиеся в оппозиции к богам Сурам (потомкам Адити), аналогично оппозиции «боги—титаны» или «боги—гиганты» в греческой мифологии. В зороастризме же — всё наоборот; асуры там объявляются богами, дэвы — демонами.

Asuras (Sanskrit: असुर) are a class of beings or power-seeking clans related to the more benevolent Devas (also known as Suras) in Hinduism. The term is assumed to be linguistically related to the Ahuras of Indo-Iranian people and pre-Zoroastrianism era.[1][2][3]

And that theologic opposition could be the source of hindu-muslim conflict which lead to the division between India and Pakistan. And also Heathens and Abrahamists. And thus it is a strange position for the whites: we're historically Indoeuropean, and we also consider semites satanic, but we obey semitic religion, but russians have much more sympathy to indians than to some jews or arabs. It is a weird situation and can be related to that uroboros situation, when snake bites on its own tail.
and it could relate to the way indians and europeans write left to right, and semites go right to left.

utero утроба  (I wonder if the ба stands for inside, but seing this suffix elsewhere, maybe not)

some piece of mind about where did the universe come from:
Nothing is the only "something" to which the question "where did THAT (god, singularity) come from?" is inapplicable. But such solution raises questions about how can something appear out of nothing (and response to that would be that absolute nothing only exists in the absolute past, and emptiness equals isotropy, and the accelerations are also not absolute zeros, because absolutes are merely mathematical abstractions, that because of resonance effects anisotropy grows up to the modern state of events during some infinite ammount of time)
But that's only my explanation, I haven't read Fred Hoyle yet.

> (somebody asked of jews looking like satan's chidren instead of god's ones)
Their god is satan to you, they believe that your god is satan too. That's pretty much the way boundaries between nations are drawn. Гaд [gad] is snake in russian, god in russian is bog, goat is also not far, etc.
Asuras are satans in hinduism, bud gods in zoroastrism.
And probably the direction of writing has direct relation to this story.
They're surely selected (but who knows for what, most probably to be the scapegoat to the powers that be)

I close my eyes and try to imagine how my mind works. I feel my ears from the inside, and I try to couple other body of mine, and I see that heart make it rather asymetric, and isn't it why it beats? Always trying to get to the centre of the flesh? or to divide? Why dosn't liver beat? it hicks. It is kickin'

hicks there is a typo, the word type os better than scribo, so I type.  Notebooks profits are I can sell them,

I felt calling someone else a jew is like cursing someone.

I invent

I live further from people. But they may place syrens even

заманиха самая низкая? к озеру. якобы (я не проверял) восстановили историческoе названия улицы. ленин is членин. блюхер соня кривая - это средства подавления делая такие топонимы в центре города, а на окраинах с названиями ворОвскОго ворåшилова
Ленин есть двойная магия, членин и просит лени на, проспит простит члены на, не знаю как эта топомагическая операция называется, но мк-ультра дети в сравнении с тими сумасшедшими колдунами. Где народ живёт хуже там нечеисти больше, чёрные как черти.
Бе русские это почти черти, потому что кавказец с русским смешанный воспринимается русскими как русский, а кавказцам - в меньшей степени, как мой взгляд на это говорит (я лышл историю про то как парня, явно помешанного с кавказцем и ли таджиком, мы этих плохо различаем, был избит в ташкнте с криками "русский убирайся в свою россию" не это ли собирание русскиех земель, безумные политики, это же и есть шиза, абстрактные иерархии выражающиеся в материальных ништяках для тех кто иерархию строит. .ю но это преступный метод. фальшивая пирамида. бизнес же много пирамид, соединённых сетями коммуникаций.
Как гриб может быть вв разных формах, как и человек, во всём многообразии своих эпигений.

Don't promise. Do. (stopped myself from anouncing (русское слово анонс может научитьь этому слову и nouns, in on an,
I You it that
I Thee it that
(this a ore polite form of it)

A good way to stop using italic and colours is that internet uses plain text. Or fuck them let them preserve my htmls to read them. Whoever copies it to make it an example as the most complex sentences. I shouldn't make myself shorter to reach that silly goal. Let's become laconical, laconic, briff? brief neat.

brief as the opposite of grieve? буквально горевать. to grieve to to be to do to squeal.

l is j because delat is deyat

neat as meat? понять. поймать быть может тоже. get it? capice? Capisce? where sce of science and conscience.
science is знание, consciousness сознание.

с and н are cognates? over g and  ŋ
n looks like h, н looks like H. (that н is N)
Bothe H & N  are final in their lines, but in greek after them lay additional letters Θ and Ξ and their similarity, the eye of goat ness I mentioned in previous issues.

I would like to see A as the opposite of Y and even before that I wanted to see Ez as one letter E3 because of аз and because z has nothing to do their. z is seus for greeks but zmei for russians. zverr
becuse I recognize how D reflects R (that P is R)

L neh..
H and O could both be vowel, but if Ez is vowel, H is supposed to be labial, and it can be, it still works as such in japanese katakana and furigana.
furi as furui? but some say katakana predates furigana, as if furigana is cursive form of katakana and katakana is ingenious ainu writing script,and is still used as such. My sources are poor because I don't give the sources, and it may confuse people in where do I stand, and they should be confused, confused enough not to read this notebooks. these notebooks. this notebook.


Λ can be I because делать is деять (I wasn't sure I said it, I seid it before)

К & M are first letters in different tradition. I рисую крупными мазками, because it's still vague to me, but european tradition is labial first consonant. And M is the ultimate labial.
And Λ plays I for IMN and four-ness of the elements make it ΛΜΝΞ
ΛΜΝΞ almost exactly repeat ΑΒΓΔ (Α and Δ remind eachother so much again)

ΑΒΓΔ used to be something like ᛆᛒᚦ and then it naturally was fire+air water and hard soil
a as agni, that is what rigveda praises first. Vayu comes second, but it's not water, air. fire + air.
Rigveda is probably 1. Here I hypothesise that other vedas are of water and the land. (including precious metals) and I go to research this guess:

And Rig Veda is the first indeed.
There it begins with the hymn of fire, which I new when I typed the previous paragraph. And after that there goes Vayu, the god of air,
Vayu (Sanskrit pronunciation: [ʋaːjʊ], Sanskrit: वायु, IAST: Vāyu) is a primary Hindu deity, the lord of the winds as well as deity of breath and the spiritual father of Hanuman and Bhima. He is also known as Anila ('air, wind'), Vyāna ('air'), Vāta ('airy element'), Tanuna ('the wind'), Pavana ('the purifier'),[3] and sometimes Prāṇa ('the life force').
then some Asvins
In the Rigveda, the Aśvins are always referred to in the dual, without individual names,[5] although Vedic texts differentiate between the two Aśvins: "one of you is respected as the victorious lord of Sumakha, and the other as the fortunate son of heaven" (RV 1.181.4). They are called several times divó nápātā, that is 'grandsons of Dyaús (the sky-god)'. This formula is comparable with the Lithuanian Dievo sūneliai, 'sons of Dievas (the sky-god'), attached to the Ašvieniai; the Latvian Dieva dēli, the 'sons of Dievs (the sky-god)'; and the Greek Diós-kouroi, the 'boys of Zeus',
And that Sumakha is the only thing referring to some elements, and if it's dual, and the dawn, then those twins are sun and earth, and both were recognized as solids, and both were recognized as living together as a system, earth would be meaningless without the sun.
as Mother without a son wouldn't be a mother. Is it how M and Ϻ are connected Μ and Σ
I don't know where it leads me, maybe only to that pair of interest is also yellow, which make this pair at some similar distance with Θ and Ξ
and after Sumakha goes Indra, which makes the order Fire Air Soilids Water. to be continued.

Sama Veda, to my surprise, also starts with hymns to Agni.
but soon it goes all about Indra, who is connected to water:
In the Vedas, Indra is the king of Svarga (Heaven) along with his capital city Amaravati and the Devas. He is the deity of the heavens, lightning, thunder, storms, rains, river flows, and war.
which makes sense, because Indus is a river.

सिन्ध sindhu is the indian name for Indus, and you can see ind in that name, and russians call that river Ind.
सिंधु is als translated as ocean, sea and Indus river is सिन्धु नदी Indus River Sindu Nadi.

So order in Sama Veda is different: Fire Water and then goes Soma Pavamana and the.. what am I actually doing here, Rig Veda doesn't stop there, so why did I stop watching? I think I attempted to dig where an aixscovator is needed.

I will return to vedas as the source of alphabetic knowledge sometimes. Later. Well, maybe fast, first hymns of the other two vedas, let's check them:

But YajurVeda looks like some grimoir of soma and agni sacrifices, with some vast ammount f text, I think that text even more hard to understand than mine: Gayatri has eight syllables etc.
But I look at the very beginning of it
and I find  Savitṛ (Sanskrit: stem savitṛ-, nominative singular savitā) in Vedic mythology is an Aditya i.e. off-spring of the Vedic primeval mother goddess Aditi. His name in Vedic Sanskrit connotes "impeller, rouser, vivifier."

He is sometimes associated with – and at other times distinguished from – Surya, "the Sun". When considered distinct from the Sun proper, he is conceived of as the divine influence or vivifying power of the Sun. The Sun before sunrise is called Savitr, and after sunrise until sunset it is called Sūrya.[1]
That sun-ness of
Savitr is venerated in the Rig Veda, the oldest component of the Vedic scriptures. He is first recorded in book three of the Rigveda; (RV 3.62.10)

That He is sometimes associated with – and at other times distinguished from – Surya, "the Sun". makes me think of Asvins.

But I am completely ignorant in this part of mythology and thus unable to comprehend this text properly, whatever I say would be some sort of plasphemy, prophanity is the word. profanity.

The Atharva Veda (Sanskrit: अथर्ववेदः, Atharvavedaḥ from atharvāṇas and veda, meaning "knowledge") is the "knowledge storehouse of atharvāṇas, the procedures for everyday life".[4] The text is the fourth Veda, but has been a late addition to the Vedic scriptures of Hinduism.[5][6]
The language of the Atharvaveda is different from Vedic Sanskrit, preserving pre-Vedic Indo-European archaisms.[7][8] It is a collection of 730 hymns with about 6,000 mantras, divided into 20 books.[8] About a sixth of the Atharvaveda texts adapts verses from the Rigveda, and except for Books 15 and 16, the text is in poem form deploying a diversity of Vedic matters.[8] Two different recensions of the text – the Paippalāda and the Śaunakīya – have survived into modern times.[9] Reliable manuscripts of the Paippalada edition were believed to have been lost, but a well-preserved version was discovered among a collection of palm leaf manuscripts in Odisha in 1957.[9]
The Atharvaveda is sometimes called the "Veda of magical formulas",[4] a description considered incorrect by other scholars.[10] In contrast to the 'hieratic religion' of the other three Vedas, the Atharvaveda is said to represent a 'popular religion', incorporating not only formulas for magic, but also the daily rituals for initiation into learning (upanayana), marriage and funerals. Royal rituals and the duties of the court priests are also included in the Atharvaveda.[11]
The Atharvaveda was likely compiled as a Veda contemporaneously with Samaveda and Yajurveda, or about 1200 BC – 1000 BC.[2][12] Along with the Samhita layer of text, the Atharvaveda includes a Brahmana text, and a final layer of the text that covers philosophical speculations. The latter layer of Atharvaveda text includes three primary Upanishads, influential to various schools of Hindu philosophy. These include the Mundaka Upanishad, the Mandukya Upanishad and the Prashna Upanishad.[13][14]

but I look inside anyway:

And that word  Vāchaspati brings
and that raga tells The mnemonic phrase is sa ri gu mi pa dhi ni.
and I dig further into this new territory.
Svara or Swara (स्वर, generally pronounced as swar or swara and not swaraa) is a Sanskrit word that connotes simultaneously a breath, a vowel and the sound of a musical note corresponding to its name. Most of the times a swara is identified for both musical note and tone, but a tone is a precise substitute for sur, related to tunefulness. Traditionally, Indians have just seven swaras/notes with short names, e.g. saa, re/ri, ga, ma, pa, dha, ni which Indian musicians designate as saptaka. It is one of the reasons why svara is considered a symbolical expression for the number seven.

 wissenschaftler where wissen is knowledge once again reveals cognate, ведание, ведение, he who knows (where) leads. wissen
wissen ву вувф вувф ведать. поведать. видеть. все эти слова свидетельствуют что ss is д
If s is c then it could be ᚴ and double ᚴ would be ᚦ
and now I have to look for ᛆᛒᚴᚦ and I find nothing, so maybe not.

n & т are also last in their lines. I wonder if it makes them cognatic. asn if s (and especially ß is a form of t, just like ſ could be, like ᛚ reminds ᛐ which is ᛏ
And when I lookded for ᚴᚦ I havent even found that, but Viking Age runic inscriptions normally do not have two identical runes in a row. This is valid even for two runes that belong to two different words, one at the end of a previous one, the other at the beginning of a following one (if no separators are used). Cf. raþu for rað þu below. (I believe that raþ to be the evidence of ᚱ standing for П and thus what they read as raþ is russian под. a brave clame, let's test my science once again, I left so many loopholes to test that dull researcher may find this theory false once he finds some of them to be wrong, but what he must know is that these verses are not necessarily connected to the rest of the work: some dead branches don't make whole the tree dead. Their destiny is to fall off)

ᚠ in futhark could write as ᚨᚩᚪᚫᚬᚭᚯᚰ (these all are where a is in futhark. ᚰ is binderune on, ǫ which is o with ogonek, nasal o)
this is complere complete unicode block for runes. (nordic only) others are in oe piece in the end of this work, I hope you don't mind I broke the norsk set.

ᛆ  ᛒ  ᚦ
ᚾ ᚠ ᚵ ᚼ (ᛡ is ё) 
ᛁ  ᚴ ᛚ ᛘ ᚿ
ᚮ ᚱ ᛦ ᛋ ᛏ ᚢ (if R, or ᛣ if Q)

I don't know if I ever noticed, that like hebrew, runic alphabet is also gradual.

א ב  ג  ד
ה  ו  ז  ח  ט
י  כ  ל  מ  נ  ס
ע פ צ  ק  ר ש ת

I retransliterated so many letters, why not to use this unacademic freedom to compare these lines to say that if ᛣ and ᛦ are R Q then ᛋ ᛏ ᚢ  are  s t u, as I think romans had it.

ᚮ ᚱ ᛦ ᛋ ᛏ ᚢ  in comaprison to russian are О П Р С Т У
ф that usually follows is taught to never appear in originally russian words. only in borrowings.
ц ч ш щ ъ ыь эюя are probably the later addition, probably the christian greekstian influence.

I start comparing jewish lines
 ס to ש


and here I see that they have destroyed some structure when they expaneded the original 3456 of the 18
and 12 are the 3 that add up it to the 21
and the structure they could have destroeyed is
א ב  ג  ד
ה  ו  ז  ח  ט
י  כ  ל  מ  נ  ס
ע פ צ  ק  ר ש ת

I notice that it's another reason to replace כ and מ

א ב  ג  ד
ה  ו  ז  ח  ט
י  מ  ל  כ  נ  ס
ע פ צ  ק  ר ש ת

and I see that
it's whether there was a letter between ב and ג, some в between б and г,
or they added letters before velars in the lines 2 3 4
The same story as with ל being a form of כ can be seen in arabic,
only theree it's the other way around ل and ک ,گ
ו and ז could be one a variant of the other вита (bio) is zoo? who knows.s.
and in the fourth I can only unite פ and צ becauseof how similar they are in cursive sofit.
(see .odo)

א ב  ג  ד
ה  ו  ח  ט
י  מ  כ  נ  ס
ע פ  ק  ר ש ת
what did I remove? zain, lingam, tsadi isn't even in latin, fuck tsadiks too.

ט looks like cobra and snake is zmeya in russian, is it the z greeks placed in front as zeus?
Is ט not a θ anymore? Russians didn't have ф, but what are russians..
either way ט is not labial in hebrew, at least in the modern hebrew.
did jews reform f to be t? are f and t half θ's?
Either way, that 19-letter hypothetic hebrew,
19 is a number in lunar calendars, the goden number or something,
 The golden number of any Julian or Gregorian calendar year can be calculated by dividing the year by 19, taking the remainder, and adding 1. (In mathematics this can be expressed as (year number modulo 19) + 1.)
For example, 2021 divided by 19 gives 106, remainder 7. Adding 1 to the remainder gives a golden number of 8.
The golden number, as it was later called, first appears in a calendar composed by Abbo of Fleury around the year 1000. Around 1162 a certain Master William referred to this number as the golden number "because it is more precious than the other numbers."[1] The term golden number became widely known and used, in part through the computistic poem Massa Compoti written by Alexander de Villa Dei around 1200.[2]
I yet have to take lessons to learn how to read it.
ANd it will be a great reason to find peace with academia.

א ב  ג  ד
ה  ו  ח  ט
י  מ  כ  נ  ס
ע פ  ק  ר ש ת

is a wonderful set
I wonder if it ever existed.
And I know that ש is ash, fire, thus it should be red.
and thus it becomes more rainbowish with k for kane, money, these two are probably cognates,
Then red ש,yellow כ, blue מ, white or black א for whether air or soil
And if k is kin, kane, kuznya,, coin is the word I'm looking fore for.
coin is mint as kane and money.
I have direct Yin and Yang of М and Ш.
M flows down, Ш raises up.
K isn't even mentioned in whether greek or jewish myth about the first letters.
A is vowels in the greek myth and AMШ are directly the three first letters of the jewish myth.
I wonder why I began writing jewish as ch just now, as if I would call them chinese.

In the previous image alphabet order is only used for the days of the weeks.

I heard that Shakespear removed slavicisms out of english, like hlaef for bread.
Burgess just made the opposite to both confusion of tongues (making some russian words known to english audience and to what Shakespear (or whoever if anyone) did)
Soon we'll understand every language via some artificial extra-neocortex. And it will definitely be the opposite to what bible reports on multitude of languages, though I consider that report to be false)

Slavicisms happen to be a great source for research:
hlaef for хлеб shows that а f reflects b, thus russian b could be V, what В literally is.
it makes sense in the voiced-sonor-voiceless theory, but if ЕБ is how the second line began, it makes sense that they had to change it when the christian puritans came.
nah, it doesn't make any sense, and I'm serious, it doesn't unfold, it's apopheny.
Абе like father makes sense, Aбе Г-дъ vakes sense too.
Then the second line is Eve. Eve G-h (almost wrote G-d, but G-h gospozaha gospozha gospozah)
and that h reflects ה, but it could be the ח, h, as in Hannah.
Alphabet probably can be read, but until I find a historic reference to it, I should probably not try to read it. But I'm as far as I ever wa. Those are the .. let's think further..

И-line confused me because it was breaking the voiced-voiceless order, Yang first, Yin seond, Just as Agni is before Indra.
oo is u and I can see how pp would be f (then p is гамма, if f is дигамма)

Собака speaks. Dog talk.
собака собит пособит
I mix all the languages.

the curse is over. I think I got cursed to recognize what curse is and how to remove it.

I don't know what picrelated is, but a video about it was very much retarded. (no link for retarded video, maybe later)
And I meet this image in a magic thread.
I may trigger people from both spectrums with these links.
Please forgive, nobody's perfect. Those are sources I use, I was taught to give the references.

and now I wonder why didn't I recognize those numbers, they are exactly the
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
I noticed to be graphically similar among the columns.


C is the third and final line. S & K in one form.
C is staveless d
C is  Ɔ or Ↄ  because of D then.
thus why b is like this? who knows, in greek it's β, which probably relates the p.
β and p may say that labials were with down-stroke, d is a good form for the opposite lingual.
And thus D should look the way d looks. And probably reversed in the process of confusion in comparison of D to double B. And doublenesss of B tells us it's V if it's double b and f if double p.
b voiced tail looks up
p voiceless form of the same, tail's down.
ᚠ is F or A?
if ᚴ is h, hh is A
whati if A was
hh is haha, not heil hitler, hitler is a new meme.
h is глухой смешок. A is ор во всё горло.
горло орало орудие? не..
орало о чём орало? Перфоратора тогда не было, но Молот здорово орёт.

орёл озирала
о-рил what is ril?
говорил варил бурил морил сорил шустрил дарил сколько примров с просто буквами. and ril is not a russian word.

чадил (чары чад? очаровал окурил охмурил? хмурь муть хомуть )

what does it teach? nobody knows.

da ri as a syllable? z looks like cursive r, and rst could be from the same cluster or even same egg.
(I pulled it out of чары чад pair)

осознанность сть ис себя тебя?
преданность носит.
осознанность он со сна носит?
осознанный от со сна он
они как суффикс единственного числа уже вводили и до канадских пидаров?
зачем я делаю это непечатаемым? это черновики, они доступны но не печатаемы. печатать буду конспект из всего этого безумия.
Я нахожу какие-то структуры, но как и в биологических системах, мусора вокруг плавает тоже предостаточно.  Как бы его убрать. По счастью, в литературной работе это сделать прощею New edition is coming once I find a man who helps me make it in the eagle mode.

I thought epo was of epos, but it's etymologized as epi, upon, which allows me to draw line to по.
топоним тоже эпоним? топос место.  t(𓏏)
если your fonts show 𓏏 as something similar to θ then you can see  t  as stone, and not bread. stone is semantically closer to a place than a loaf of bread. Did egyptians even know yeast? probably nah.

duh and nah are da i net
day and night
deus and knight?
devis and конница
devi l is levi
not deus, leus, лев.
judo yudo
опять меня куда-т не туда снесло.

If your fonts show 𓏏 as something similar to θ then you can see  t  as stone, half of it in the ground as buildings are built. And that egyptian form tells that θ is t and not f.
Why did I say it was f?  Let's collide these two ideas.
θ as t also makes sense, because its under d and above t as the final letter in its row.

today I was doing my math with a little help from a programmer friend.

it's pretty if you tilt your head to the left a little
(but it's probably possible to make this pretty if any chaos reflects itself)
(but taht diagonal ribbon would be incredibly pretty if woven of 12 threads (or maybe less, it could be not 12 but 13 because when it's decimal, 9 never comes, because 9*9=81 (now you should understand what you're looking at)
and we also played with the thing I've shown before:
2 and 3 meet in 6:

a boring prime 7:

and when they meet in 42:

And only when I added it here, could I see that it is the very same 42 which is supposed to be the meaning of life. And I can decypher it now: it's 6*7 god and devil, good and evil, yin and yang whatever you name it. And if we add them it's two 21's.
Also this structure (if it was known to the ancients, which it could) can explain why 🜄 is considered to be female and 🜂 male (not only because 🜄 is how female genitalia looks) because female is the hole and male is the shaft. in this sense:
(this images are to be watched rotated clockwise by 45 degrees, but it's impossible to make it correctly)
that 42 thing was truly accidental, it's just how many numbers I have prepared for this thing, purely accidental.

that typo of look as ook may tell that this english verb is connected with russian око.

But that multiplication pattern is rather chaotic. We humans tend to see things in chaos, especially when it has some symmetry:

a be
I am
U was?

Is was polite (not so sure) version of be? Is past polite?
Сослагательное наклонение (future in the past) is a more polite form of a question.

Nuxalk Honor Song:

B T сначала звонкая, затем глухая. сначала губная, затем

LMN, this constanta(?) I think they call it constants (simply because they don't change in the languages. And that's why it's constant, not in mathematical sense.
сонстант остаётся с нами.
остаётся с ночевой? типа того.
математика сузила этот термин, приняв за него абсолютную константу. Математика абсолютами оперирует? Как видим на этом примере. М Мысль бежит по мозгу от нейрона к нейрону.  например.

Каждый нейрон содержит набор идей или одну идею, является живым воплощением какой-то идеи. Идея, записаннная в нейронах (да небось не в одном. В каком-то больше одно, в каком-то другом двругое. Еру ьщку  The more we spoke the more we learnt to switch before keyboards.
not before but between.
tween in between are twee двое twin
and be is the same prefix word before before and between and below and begin I need a genie's help to start a movement? Any body to which o power is appliesd is going to move or rest the way it was before. I should apply this knowledge to my life and accelerate into immortality by paying people to .. And my back hurts, it doesn't wanna work It commmunicates with pain, which is also an nervoius signal, the one they can, the one they can, They have another one: pleassure. Promisquity is looking for pleasures and misssing the joy.
joy счастье сейчас есть чадо.
чадо is what I saw as the opposite of promisquity.
счастье это спасибо что живой? что счас ты е
e reflects b as those diagonal symmetries
est be бысть.
B c T
B is the first letter. A is the honorary vowel, which was given such honour, when they thus reversed the order from bce to ad?
Are some texts we consider today шифрами смещения shift scijphers are actually texts written before the reform of shift? How would abecedary influence the pronounciation of the text? So this guess is off the target. Is white text a cypher? one of the most dumb, because it reveals itself if you send the text by copy paste. The worse cypher is only adding ma to all the words: выводима воскама (at first it's not clear if you tell выводи or выводим, и может сбить с толку
может сбить с толку может быть способно сбить с толку. быть требует способно.

требует demand спрос запрос вопрос питання (question питания)

half of my head now is busy with jewish question. But I know what I have to say what I didn't put down well enough: how b reflects e on both semantic (be est) level and graphical too, who on graphical level c is similar to i and D to O
That corver C corner D A O is my initials.

I disregard the U line for two reasons: old alphabets didn't have it, the reflection has only 4 letters.
G (Г) reflects J
P reflects h (8 reflects х?)
L doesn't reflect q very well. Was it Samekh that reflected Q? Or am I pulling two far.
X and S come together well. but that's the disregarded line.
And I don't feel like R is the final in the diagonal. Even though  Я i i is final in russian.
AFK what follows is OS is it where QS plays along as off questions. or is it ОПРСТ - I go with this version, especially because S is what mentioned in Sefer Yetzirah, and it gives the primal forms, because that is what it is about. And amt is a grammatic flexion of it, as es and est.
And if the order is as it is in russian, oprst, then R reflects L and we can rotate the system accordingly:

If this was their system (if it was) let's see what is their numeral system then:
1 2 3 4
5 10 15 20
25 50 75 100 (also because that's how old we get)
which demands me to stop by it's roundness, but L is 50 in the roman we know, and we go on:
125 250 375 500 and suddenly that is the maximal numeral in roman we know too.

проверка: gaps between 4 20 100 500 are 16 80 400 and it's multiplication by 5 in both cases, and that is a numeral system with the base 5

I think I went too far this time: .. but I see OMGd.
even though a moment ago I shrinked at G being 15

G is Girl?
few days ago I thought that dog is secretly god, and now it's a gal?
собака святая? dog drug друг собака пособит (на охоте так точно, как пособник, своя, собака своя, сука, сочится, течная сука, сука ссыт)

Сука is a word for a gal, simple niggers say exactly that.

was it rascians who accidentally invented the nigger meme by misreading such a plackard?

 Для определения в какой системе счисления записано число, внизу, справа от числа ставят цифру, которая называется основанием системы счисления. Например, 13045 или 20335
but that is said about positional system of numeration, bot the one I spoke about before.

but it's funny that (1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 50 75 100 125 250 375 500)10 is
(1 2 3 4 10 20 30 40 100 200 300 400 1000 2000 3000 4000)5
and 万5 would be the next in the line. It even has the line above it.
but that's nothing more than some poetic babble. bubble. lie?

and I'm surprise by this interpretation abcede, makes sense though, it's obviously meaningful. I"ms surprised.

and of course it's far from being completer, but it seems all the suffixes are already recognized, so I have to just map them all. I will collect sources for such a map here and further on. Or mamybe I will make an effort to bring them to vol.8 (mirror) (mirror) (mirror)  (mirror) (mirror)
And this collection actually sets a questio: I thought that collecting all these short pieces I can reconstruct the initial vocabulary, but some xylo as a basal element and if I don't know where are x or l come from, it doesn't help me at all, and yet that is why I dig deeper into the structures to see the basal basalts. So I know what exactly to look after. The shortest pieces? Pronouns, and such. On letter or at least (or rather at most) one-syllabe long. and I think that list can help me.. And I can do it by hand, withut ai. To be continued.

ᛴ is named Os, just as these: ᚨᚩᚪᚫᚬᚭ (and now I see why: ᛴ is two strokes over the central)
The diversity of ᚫᚬ tells that it's just two strokes on the staff. Not much matter how or where.

and it's even like this:
That double stroke goes everywhere, except the lowest point, but runes usually don't stoke out of there, not even ᛦ,
ᛒ is the only standard rune that touches its staff at the lowest point.
ᛞ is not exactly classic, it has two staves, which is misunderstanding of the concept,
it could be double ᚦ and probably was.
and ᛥ is double ᛞ
ᛥ recognized as st shows the boundaries in which ᛞ go: s t is the claset, is ᛥ and we have the sequence: ᚦᛞᛥ and it's the final letters in the three lines.
ᚾᚠᚵᚼ(ᛡ)ᛁᚴᛚᛘ(ᛉ) (double ᛘ is ᛗ, both are recognized as m's)
ᚿᚮᚱᛦ(ᛣ)ᛋᛏᚢ (because ᛋᛏ is ᛥ)

Why M is among the linguals? is it related to Ϻ question?
ᛞ isn't lingual and does it ay that ᛗ is of Daddy read as mommy? Because of the differences in the cultures? I means it is possible, but come on! that's not only raw it's not even caught.

Is ᚦ is in the start and ᛥ is in the end, then weher do we place the ᛞ thing? It would be perfect in the middle or right past it. Righin the end of the middle? samekh I am sinking of?
Ϻ looks like both ᛞ and ᛗ

Каменные надписи каменный век? пещерный. затем глиняный век, домашний. затем бетонный век, городской. Обычные люди-то ни бронзу ни железо не умеют производить, только в коллективе.
бетонный это железобетонный и есть. что будет следующим? Сразу биологические системы или какая-то переходная модель. Для людей, которые скорей всего умрут без помощи до становления бессмертности общедоступной?
Капсулы пластиковые дешевле всего будут. но железобетонные лучше. прочнее.
Okay now when we understand what this world is, let's live in it at full range and change what we want to change not what we just understood would be great.

inflammable is flammable.
predominant is dominant. (these tow two could be result of some musical reform)

I pund it.

Ухват U-хват.
That U could originate from goat gesture. literally go, уходи (ходи is walk, уходи is go away, as if that U is in both oUt and aWay, away is literally way in dutch (both way and away are weg, and that could be the same g as in ga (go))

as i A is Да & U is no, ν

to numerals: greeks also had the cycle of thousands in their numerals, and thus as romans had тысячеричную систему счисления.

A those lists of suffixes tell, ix is a female suffix, and thus matrix is the female form of the Master.
Not someone, who's the boss in this all, but this all itself.

tells me that the highest note was la, which relates to lala, a little girl.
utut is close to отец. aunt uncle дядя daddy abe back to æddy to link to отче.
е comes as de ef

bridge brings. brings земли together. до создания карт север-юг-запад-восток всем ли знакомо было или лишь мудрецам? за тридевять земель быть может рассказывает, что пространство между потоками воды называлос землёю, но тогда вопрос направления играет роль, возможно, осткрова были средствами коректирования направления, чтоб не посчитать притоки за две реки, что переосмысливает вопрос о том что называть островом, ведь логично чтобы города были естественным образом защищены реками.
Все крутые столицы на островах: париж, лондон, рим, токио

to read further: vol.9