𓄿     [a]
𓅂    [tjw]
𓅃    [ḥrw]  [nṯr]  [ḥry]  [nb] (𓅄 [bjk]  [ḥrw]  [nṯr]  [nb])
𓅐    [mwt]  [nrt]
𓅓    [m]  [jm]  [n] (𓅔 (mm, m, nm))
𓅘    [nḥ]  [nḥḥ]
𓅙    [ḏb]
𓅚    [rḫyt]
𓅛    [rḫyt]
𓅜    [ꜣḫ]
𓅞    [hb]   [ḏḥwtj]   [jqr]   [jp]
𓅟   [dšr]
𓅠   [gmj]  [gm]
𓅡    [bꜣ]
𓅣   [bnw] (𓅤 [bꜥḥj])
𓅥   [sdꜣ]  [dꜣ]
𓅦    [njw]
𓅧   [ꜥq]
𓅨   [mnt]   [wr]
𓅪   [bjn]    [nḏs]
𓅬   [ꜣpd]    [gb]    [ḥtm]
𓅭   [sꜣ]   [zꜣ]
𓅮   [pꜣ]   (𓅯   [ḫnj]   ([pꜣ, qmꜣ] (?)))
𓅰   [wšꜣ]   [ḏfꜣw])
𓅱    [w]
𓅷   [ṯꜣ]   [ṯꜣty]
𓅸  [sš]  𓅹[sš]  these could be the prototype of Ш along with 𓆷
𓅺  [rḫtj]
𓅻  [ḥꜣm]  [ḥjm]
𓅼  [snm]

I selected those which have relatively simple phonetic representations,
and here's what I got:
𓄿     [a]
𓅓    [m]  [jm]  [n]
𓅙    [ḏb]
𓅜    [ꜣḫ]
𓅡    [bꜣ]
𓅥   [sdꜣ]  [dꜣ]
𓅧   [ꜥq]
𓅭   [sꜣ]   [zꜣ]
𓅮   [pꜣ]
𓅱    [w]
𓅷   [ṯꜣ]   [ṯꜣty]
𓅸  [sš]  𓅹[sš]  (𓆷 [š] and that's a super find)
and it was 12 of them (it's hard to say was it legitimately, coincidentally or supconsciously so. After all, if I included ḏb, why not include 𓅃[nb]   𓅘[nḥ]   𓅞[hb~jp]   𓅠[gm]   𓅨[wr]   𓅬[gb]?
With these it would be 18 of them
And if we go even purer, we find ourselves with only three: 𓄿𓅓𓅱

If 𓄿𓅱𓅓 were in this order ever recorded for Aum the great Om, then 𓅱 is indeed w, otherwise it's ш.


They had a whole set of *ꜣ syllables

𓅡    [bꜣ]     𓅥  [sdꜣ]  [dꜣ]
                   𓅜  [ꜣḫ]
𓅮   [pꜣ]     𓅷   [ṯꜣ]   these two have their wings apart.
                  𓅭   [sꜣ]   [zꜣ]

looking at pꜣ  ṯꜣ line, it makes me wonder if dꜣ is little bꜣ (also because B is double D, so is П to T)

If this system was developed when AEIOU B T were all the letters, ..no, it could be of AMS period, thus 𓄿𓅱𓅓 were the three letters: it's hard to tell what is the breed of the lett bird, but to distinguish Aгромную  from Middle  from Small

But then how many of information can one transfer in this way? šma and sam and maš (as приём, сам, помогай) but a better thought told me that the transmittion could be easily disturbed by other birds.
And then it came to me (probably not for the first time) that birds would send letters. So members of the initiation into pigeon mail can transmit news over large distances. And they wouldn't reveal their method, so people would recognize it as a divination.

Pigeon post is the use of homing pigeons to carry messages. Pigeons are effective as messengers due to their natural homing abilities. The pigeons are transported to a destination in cages, where they are attached with messages, then the pigeon naturally flies back to its home where the recipient could read the message. They have been used in many places around the world. Pigeons have also been used to great effect in military situations, and are in this case referred to as war pigeons.
As a method of communication, it is likely as old as the ancient Persians, from whom the art of training the birds probably came. The Romans used pigeon messengers to aid their military over 2000 years ago. Frontinus said that Julius Caesar used pigeons as messengers in his conquest of Gaul.[2] The Greeks conveyed the names of the victors at the Olympic Games to their various cities by this means.[3]

И это объясняет такое широкое распространение голубятен в совке.


𐂖 (Mycenaean Greek for wine)
酒 (Japanese for sake)
The similarity is most likely coincidental, but it may help me memorize the two.



as you can see, they mostly have only four vowels. The only differences in the final two columns




a dot
to move

a is for nouns
to is for verbs
what is the B~M? there's no other. so it's Alpha and ..Tav (before omega)

A and T
yin and yan
гласные и согласные
подлежащее имеет голос
сказуемое делает что сказано. согласно с подлежащим (какое мерзкое слово. русский, вы уродск)

В русском эти частицы присобачиваются сзади: ть для глаголов и а для существительных:

делать, делает (ть~ти~те, ет~этот~it)
но дела, делу, дело, но дели снова глагол, и с другим вроде смыслом. Своё дело ~ своя доля.

но часто вместо а пустое место, подобно тому как артикли отпадают:
делать
дела
(так ведь и to отсутствует, как отсутствует ть, и в тех же случаях: делаю (I do. ю~я (юс=us)))

вручить в руки? гласная всегда после согласной? ведь даже кол был раньше колъ. т.е. ть ставится там, где англичание ставят to, но с другой стороны (там знечит значит в тех случаях)

а артиклей в русском нет.  есть местоимения те ~ the и a ~ какой-то, некий, и так далее, не местоимения даже, хотя.. кой какой, что, да, это вопросительные местоимения. чёткое и нечёткое местоимения. выдумываю. шучу.


Если существительные это гласные, а глаголы согласные, то наверное не только на Ти?
ти в лети но ви в рви
Но в императиве всё равно, рвите. Но, погодь, это множественное чилсо.. рви!
руби
иди
меть
мри
млей (м слюна? обоссался от восторга тоже. вода моча как грязная форма этого слова. mead?)
мёд и моча когнаты? нужно такие дремучие уровни языка вытаскивать?
mead менее грязная М "вода" чем моча. дъ как да.
we более высокая форма слова me



has he (does it tell hat he was se? she? hash? stash)
have we

в контексте has ~ stash,
have is not ха́ваю, а хова́ю (hide (вы у одних, те у других? как это? hide ~ de he (his)))

show ~ share (ᚢ~ᚱ)



Артемида            Афродита         Афина
девственница    любовница        умница


Are they three approaches to alphabet? Three stages of alphabet maybe?

Artemis (the final flexion is whether the same letter, or arbitrary, determined by the local grammar)
AKTM is the eastern order, where the sun is born (it's Artemis, and what if alphabet wasn't changed, K and R were just mixed up.

Aphrodite
AFKDT is very abcd-like. Each letter is prototype of the column, so it's in between.  OPRT-like
is the western order. Ladies first. So IJKLMN is not an anomaly, but could be the IKLMN, the original indian order. I is for India. Hindus say it's not their toponym. But that could be just the change in their dynasties. They probably have some monarch-like dynamics at least on local levels.

Athena
Is the mixed-up

In ancient Greek religion and mythology, Artemis (/ˈɑːrtɪmɪs/; Ancient Greek: Ἄρτεμις) is the goddess of the hunt, the wilderness, wild animals, nature, vegetation, childbirth, care of children, and chastity.[1][2] In later times, she was identified with Selene, the personification of the Moon.[3] She was often said to roam the forests and mountains, attended by her entourage of nymphs. The goddess Diana is her Roman equivalent.


Artemis was one of the three major virgin goddesses, alongside Athena and Hestia. Artemis preferred to remain an unmarried maiden and was one of the three Greek goddesses over whom Aphrodite had no power.[5]

Aphrodite (/ˌæfrəˈdaɪtiː/ ⓘ, AF-rə-DY-tee)[a] is an ancient Greek goddess associated with love, lust, beauty, pleasure, passion, procreation, and as her syncretized Roman counterpart Venus, desire, sex, fertility, prosperity, and victory. Aphrodite's major symbols include seashells, myrtles, roses, doves, sparrows, and swans. The cult of Aphrodite was largely derived from that of the Phoenician goddess Astarte, a cognate of the East Semitic goddess Ishtar, whose cult was based on the Sumerian cult of Inanna. Aphrodite's main cult centers were Cythera, Cyprus, Corinth, and Athens. Her main festival was the Aphrodisia, which was celebrated annually in midsummer. In Laconia, Aphrodite was worshipped as a warrior goddess. She was also the patron goddess of prostitutes, an association which led early scholars to propose the concept of "sacred prostitution" in Greco-Roman culture, an idea which is now generally seen as erroneous.

Athena[b] or Athene,[c] often given the epithet Pallas,[d] is an ancient Greek goddess associated with wisdom, warfare, and handicraft[2] who was later syncretized with the Roman goddess Minerva.[3] Athena was regarded as the patron and protectress of various cities across Greece, particularly the city of Athens, from which she most likely received her name.[4] The Parthenon on the Acropolis of Athens is dedicated to her. Her major symbols include owls, olive trees, snakes, and the Gorgoneion. In art, she is generally depicted wearing a helmet and holding a spear.


Artemis was one of the three major virgin goddesses, alongside Athena and Hestia.

In ancient Greek religion and mythology, Hestia (/ˈhɛstiə, ˈhɛstʃə/; Ancient Greek: Ἑστία, lit. 'hearth, fireplace, altar') is the virgin goddess of the hearth and the home. In myth, she is the firstborn child of the Titans Cronus and Rhea, and one of the Twelve Olympians.

In ancient Greek religion and mythology, the twelve Olympians are the major deities of the Greek pantheon, commonly considered to be Zeus, Poseidon, Hera, Demeter, Aphrodite, Athena, Artemis, Apollo, Ares, Hephaestus, Hermes, and either Hestia or Dionysus.[2] They were called Olympians because, according to tradition, they resided on Mount Olympus.
Besides the twelve Olympians, there were many other cultic groupings of twelve gods.


Artemis preferred to remain an unmarried maiden and was one of the three Greek goddesses over whom Aphrodite had no power.[5]
naturally, if she was a virgin, child.

Wiki confused me.
I never knew of Hestia, so why now change the revelation after I read what is also not necessarily the truth.

(the following is slavic spelling)
Artemida, Afrodita, Afina is the greek goddesses starting with A I ever knew.
And in that light they're the eastern alphabetic order, the western alphabetic order, and something even more ancient: some proto-alphabetic order of ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜΝ with Θ being from f to t, and N being close to M. So, probably she represents the latest stage of the alphabet, where no structure can be immediately seen. It's only a guess, but a powerful one.

Here are some google's responses to "artemis aphrodite athena"
Do Athena, Aphrodite, and Artemis get along? No, according to the Homeric Hymns, Athena and Artemis are two of the three deities Aphrodite has no power over. Hestia is the third. Athena and Aphrodite were rivals for the golden apple and the title of Kallisti.

Artemis and Aphrodite had a rivalry that was not no secret. Aphrodite hated that Artemis had some people who believed in the virgin goddess who stay single and don't fall in love. So the goddess of love and beauty would target those who follow Artemis and kill or make them fall in love.

Hestia is Athena's girlfriend, although they have mostly kept their relationship a secret. The two get along very well, both as long time members of TGOEM and as romantic partners.



Образование индоктринирует (учит подчиняться: приходить во время, соблюдать дрескод, заниматься скучной хуетой за жрать)

Охрана порядка нужна чтоб делать вид, что бандиты, которые половину твоих доходов забирают, заботятся о тебе

Первое следует заменить образовательными программами в интернете и кружками по интересам. Второе — всеобщим общедоступным видеонаблюдением и общедоступной базой данных, где подвиги каждого можно посмотреть, искусственным интеллектом по разным шкалам подрезюмированный (столько-то хороших дел сделал, столько-то сомнительных, и ты сразу можешь видеть с кем общаешься.

А общественный транспорт блаблакаром заменить.

Чем меньше государство "помогает" экономике, тем лучше у этой экономики дела. Корреляция прямая и универсальная. Это настолько непреложная закономерность, что можно её в фундамент экономики как науки поместить. И, естественно, это не единственное основание экономики как науки



god knows
god shows
год покажет
время покажет
год это всеобъемлющее понятие (а божества это абстрактные понятия)
год это добрая надежда. так-то может же и век быть, и слово век бохоже на бог.
наш бог больше их бога, но в заклинаниях слишком философско, недостаточно оптимистично.

Надо отбросить русский язык. Принимать язык более успешных народов.
English and Nederlands.
We already know that it's not Netherlands, but Niderlandы. Надо бы русским начинать называть их Недерланды. Чтоб у недерландцев не бомбило. Может изменили оттого, что на неделю больно поъодило. Не дер ланды не дерутся. Не дерландцы не дерутся. Not the land of der (dermany, germany, deutsch, geutsch) дерманцы герутся

в Nederlands, d вместо ð    наверняка это имеет что-то общего с Δ


назвали ~ называли (ы как шва? или доп.гласная меняет форму совершенного видва в форму вида несовершенного)


трюк ~ друг (подсадной, подставной)


не спеши ~ не кипеши (two forms of c)

віслюкUA ~ осликRU (two forms of ו (и украинская форма понятней: везёт, возлик, маленький вол))



Big Good  (Бог God.. and if B is a slavic addition, and A is jewish addition, then G D E F is the order, G D З F (Ζ in greek?)
Deuθ

I MоЛю  (changed into ill man)
О ПРоСТи

Монолю? Прости!
Мозолю? мавзолей что означает? The word mausoleum (from the Ancient Greek: μαυσωλεῖον) derives from the Mausoleum at Halicarnassus (near modern-day Bodrum in Turkey), the grave of King Mausolus, the Persian satrap of Caria, whose large tomb was one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.[1]

G-D DEVΖΗΘ (deus zeus)

IJ JK KL LM MN
IL LM MN ill lame man? это какое-то христианское саомбичивание
IMNL I'm MaN and that's it. L is Lame, Left, Long though: l
IMN (1 3 2) lnm? is it why m is off its column?

This is still a mistery.



I think this practice to write whatever comes to mind hindered my ability to communicate:


       Вместе с тем в соответствии со ст. 3 федерального закона "О погребении и похоронном деле" от 12.12.1996 погребение может осуществляться лишь путем предания тела умершего земле (путем захоронения в могилу, склеп), огню (кремация) или воде. Мавзолей как место захоронения прямо в законе не упомянут, однако учитывать решение президиума ЦИК РСФСР от 25 января 1924 года, в котором говорилось: "1. Гроб с останками Владимира Ильича сохранить в склепе, сделав последний доступным для обозрения. 2. Склеп соорудить у Кремлевской стены на Красной площади среди братских могил борцов Октябрьской революции".
       Если допустить, что с юридической точки зрения находящееся на Красной площади строение из красного гранита — большой склеп, то данное "сооружение похоронного значения" является совершенно законным местом захоронения Владимира Ульянова.
       Для того чтобы вынести его останки из склепа, следует осуществить процедуру переноса места погребения (перезахоронение). Для этого нужно не так уж много документов: заявление родственников покойного, свидетельство о смерти, справка санэпиднадзора о возможности эксгумации и квитанция об оплате похоронных работ на новом месте захоронения. В данном случае проблема состоит в том, что, как известно, ближайшая родственница покойного — племянница Ленина Ольга Ульянова — категорически против перезахоронения дяди. Без ее согласия можно было бы обойтись в том случае, если бы существовало документальное подтверждение желания покойного быть похороненным в каком-то конкретном месте. Однако за последние 15 лет такого подтверждения найти не удалось.
три элемента: земля, огонь, вода
Если огонь Агни,
вода Митра Индра,
земля.. Бхуми (instead, rigveda places Vayu (wind, воздух) and some ashvins in between)
Bhumi (Sanskrit: भूमि, romanized: Bhūmi), also known as Bhudevi, Dharani, and Vasundhara, is a significant goddess in Hinduism, personifying the Earth. Her earliest form is reflected in the Vedic goddess Prithvi, though their roles and depictions are drastically different.[3]
Bhumi features prominently in the Mahabharata and various Puranas. According to Vaishnava tradition, she is the second consort of Vishnu, along with Sridevi and Niladevi. As per Hindu mythology, Varaha, the third avatar of Vishnu, saved her from the asura Hiranyaksha and later married her, making her one of his consorts. After this rescue, Varaha and Bhumi have a son named Mangala. Bhumi also bears Narakasura, an asura, due to Hiranyaksha's influence. In the epic Ramayana, she is mentioned as the mother of Sita, the epic's female protagonist.[4]

Agni
Vayu
Indra are A U I, athus ashvins are Щ next ot W

Agni A
Vayu V
Ashvins Щ
Indra I    It's strangne that I is not the numero uno. A looks like 4, V and Щ are great 2 and 3
I
V
Щ
 А

ива? щ появилось позже: в было свистом если, губной очень похож на в, тогда язычный свист щ
иваще (и вообще)

Яша ~ Иешуа

greetings from vowels:

ὐ
ύψιλον
The name of the letter was originally just "υ" (y; also called hy, hence "hyoid", meaning "shaped like the letter υ"), but the name changed to "υ ψιλόν" u psilon 'plain υ' to distinguish it from οι, which had come to have the same [y] pronunciation
      ψηλά высокий (греческий, что с тобой не так. Должен я задать эти вопросы кому-то..
а оно ещё закрученней:
ψιλο- • (psilo-), ψιλό-
    prefix denoting that the second combining form...
        is very thin
            ‎ψιλο- (psilo-) + ‎κόβω (kóvo, “I cut”) → ‎ψιλοκόβω (psilokóvo, “I cut thinly”)
            ‎ψιλο- (psilo-) + ‎φλούδα f (floúda, “rind”) → ‎ψιλόφλουδος (psilófloudos, “with thin rind”) (especially for fruit)
        is created after meticulous process
            ‎ψιλο- (psilo-) + ‎δουλειά f (douleiá, “work”) → ‎ψιλοδουλειά (psilodouleiá)
        is not important, not serious
            ‎ψιλο- (psilo-) + ‎πράγματα n pl (prágmata, “things”) → ‎ψιλοπράγματα (psiloprágmata, “unimportant things”)

"οι, which had come to have the same [y] pronunciation" at first confused, but here's the explanation:
In early Attic Greek (6th century BCE), it was pronounced [u] (a close back rounded vowel like the English "long o͞o").[8][9] In Classical Greek, it was pronounced [y] (a close front rounded vowel), at least until 1030.[10] In Modern Greek, it is pronounced [i]; in the digraphs αυ and ευ, as [f] or [v]; and in the digraph [ου] as [u]. In ancient Greek, it occurred in both long and short versions, but Modern Greek does not have a length distinction.
As an initial letter in Classical Greek, it always carried the rough breathing (equivalent to h) as reflected in the many Greek-derived English words, such as those that begin with hyper- and hypo-. This rough breathing was derived from an older pronunciation that used a sibilant instead; this sibilant was not lost in Latin, giving rise to such cognates as super- (for hyper-) and sub- (for hypo-).

I bought it here, because greek h is s in latin. Which supports what I said of H not necessarily being [h] when the lap alphabet was invented.


Get ReaDy ~ GiRD your loins



There's kiddy rhyme amongst russian children to equate names to verbs:
Тётя Маша всех помашет, перемашет, вымашет (причём вымашет выдаёт ж в этом ж)
Тётя Маша всех помажет, перемажет, вымажет (вновь объединяя х и з (махать и мазать)
Дядя Дима всех подымит передымит выдымет (привет, Украина, они читают и как ы) и, ещё более чем вымашет, нет слова выдымать, но в нём явно слышно выдумать (латинское y транслитерируется в русский как ы) и другая форма имени Дима это Митя
Дядя Митя всех помитит, перемитит, вымитит (нет таких глаголов, но есть пометит, переметит, выметит (причём значение корня первых двух и третьего разные: в первых двух метить (to mark) а в третьем мести (to broom)) разница между этими двумя именами в приставке Де, показывающей как Деметра ~ Митра ~ Мать (как так получилось, что Митра мужским божеством считается бог весть, я говорил раньше, что уж слишком это слово похоже на Матерь)
Дядя Коля всех поколет, переколет, выколет (причём полная форма имени Николай имеет приставку ни, словно отрицающую это действие)
Дядя Саша всех посашит пересашит высашит (редкое исключение, не имеющие смысла глаголы, но если заменить ш на ж, то дядя Саша всех посажет пересажит высажит (то ли от сажа(soot) то ли от садить, но тогда было бы д вместо ж (тогда как высаживает от садить))
Другой формой имени Саша является Шура (х.з. почему)
Дядя Шура всех пошурит, перешурит, вышурит (но таких глаголов тоже нет, если же заменить ш на ж, то дядя Шура всех пожурит, пережурит, выжурит, и переходное ш/ж не самые частые буквы, что может говорить, что полной формой могло быть какое-нибудь Сашура. Сашуля может быть ласковой формой слова Саша. уродской формой, как все формы на уля-юля, но тем не менее узнаваемой. Журить is to scold, then Сашить сказать быть может? Александр.. блин, сложна.
Тётя Катя всех покатит, перекатит, перекатит выкатит (Kat rolls (though she rocks way more, rolls would make her better than whatever that silly gal was taking, fucking cobain, that retarded faggot))
Многие имена в этой игре не имеют никакого смысла: дядя петя всех попятит?
I'm a shitty writer, that's a fact.
I'm a great researcher though.


fairy ~ ferry



АБВГД
ОПРСТ is how it started for me and this work: though russian is not the alphabet in which this structure is best preserved, it has these two lines with the same ammounts of letters. And it places R (russian Р is R) across V (russian В is V) which reflects the ᚢ~ᚱ~ᛒ thing and the fuþark being abþevg hypothesis.



F-word ~ F-note  (fuck)
A-word ~ A-note (ass (another reason why it was added later (by faggots)))
B-word ~ B-note (boobs)
C-word ~ C-note (cunt)
D-word ~ D-note (dick)
E-word ~ E-note (ебать? eat (like in eat pussy (I don't recommend it, they say it's carcenogenic)))
G-word ~ G-note (okay, I lost it, unless it is G-spot, but at this point it's only a wordplay, not serious)
H-word ~ H-note (ho)



Внезапно озарило: дьявол поможет. Бог это всё устроил. Дьявол поможет нам.
Как к этой мысли пришёл: какой-то мыслестроительный процесс предшествовал этой мысли.
Сейчас не смог его вспомнить. Может от того, что Дьявол не стал поклоняться человеку (сейчас понимаю что закон не велит подчиняться кому-либо кроме бога, разве нетак?) а мне и не нужно его поклонение, служение, или что-то подобное. Нужно лишь хорошее отношение.


Я оголённым нервом прижался к ноосфере. Сам считаю, что создание порождено мозгом и новые идеи порождаются сознанием, и не признаю идеи вернадского (покрайней мере те, о которых слышал, по крайней мере эту) но люди верят в них охотней. Им хочется верить. Буду для них другую реальность лепить. Метафорическую. Ноосфера это абстракция. но люди верят в ноосферу охотней.  Буду для них в соответствии с их верованиями модель реальности леприть (моё сознание показало её маленькой, в сравнении с моей, просто копию с моей модели сознания сняло *(и узрел я её как комнаты на плане квартиры сплетённые из ветвей. комнат не больше десяти там было, и внутри комнат иногда ветви сокращают путь (если смотреть на эти линии не как стены комнат, а как дороги. Тропинки навеху машен и акведуков (сейчас про них подумал, что стена может быть дорогой)

башен ~ машин? башня ~ машина? баш и магш

что-то вроде такого, но более прямоугольное. В фиолетовой 100-filse-folder another drawing of it.
но простенки лучше здесь нарисованы, но в них было не по

somehting like this it was:
There were more of complexity. It is interesting that it's 2025 and I didn't use ai yet..


Ab Bc Cd De Ef Fg Gh Hi Ij Jk Kl Lm Mn Op Pq Qr Rs St Tu Uv Vw Wx Xy Yz Za (lost No)
De Hi No are the only thgre thhe Th three wordsw which are in the this sequence.
and both french and english only have two. Two-two letter words in the alphabetic sequence.

Аб Бв Вг Гд Де Её Ёж Жз Зи Ий Йк Кл Лм Мн Но Оп Пр Рс Ст Ту Уф Фх Хц Цч Чш Шщ Щъ Ъы Ыь Ьэ Эю Юя Яа  and in russian we have Ёж and Но и Её!
Её Ёж Но (her hedgehog but)

Comparison of russian and english made obvious that no and but are originally the same word (and but is probably not only cognate to "not" by n~u unity of un (no) in νGR~vLA



ტ as uroboros:

(the rightmost letter
of the fourth line:
ა ბ გ დ
ე ვ ზ თ
ი კ ლ მ ნ
ო პ ჟ რ ს ტ
უ ფ ქ ღ ყ შ ჩ ც ძ წ ჭ ხ ჯ ჰ)

ტაბუ taboo, but neither year, nor hour, nor day, nor time is starting with ტ in georgian.
Yet ტ is T and time does start with T, also Tag, and Y of Year looks like T. Yet none of them look like ტ

ო o
რ r (ⵔ)

ⴰⴱⴲⴳⴴⴵⴶⴷⴸⴹⴺ
ⴻⴼⴽⴾⴿⵀⵁⵂⵃⵄⵅⵆⵇⵈ
ⵉⵊⵋⵌⵍⵎⵏⵐⵑⵒ
ⵓⵔⵕⵖⵗⵘⵙⵚⵛⵜⵝⵞⵟⵠⵡⵢⵣⵤⵥⵦⵧ⵰⵿ⵯ
Tifinagh is very much off, yet it stills preserves this tendency of labials to be after vowels,only in half cases it did. Yet, considering the number of labials and the number of positions, they do tend to do.

The ⵓ-line is fascinating, that ⵔ is not P but R, yet R looks like Р in Russian.
That ⵕ stands in the Q-position  (ⵕ[ṛ] they have it in the Р[r] position, which raises once again the question of what is ⵔ and if OPQR was the same thing кап? rain drops shown by labial o-like w?)
                                                      ⵚ[ṣ]

ⵖ is an example of prepositionary antonimy: it's to, towards in Central Atlas Tamazight,
ⵖ looks like ɣ, being ɣ: /jaɣ/ [jɑ̝ʁ] and ʁ also looks like ɣ

ⵗ and ⵘ


How could it be that traditional script is even further from grace than the modern one:
It's whether that they're ..and I recalled Budeiko's idea that alphabets have tendency to organize into these structures with time. While I think that it is the original order dereiorated with time. And then in my worldview the traditional tuareg divinagh is not in the correct order, or Budeiko is correct on this one (could it be that european order influenced tifinagh? No, I saw many correlations telling that tifinagh is a form of the same structure european alphabets are: ..and to my surprese B and D do not reflect eachother, I thought of B and T being in the top of the alphabet in some other chart:
and looking for tifinagh I surfed across some ogham:


In few days I came across two euphemism people use on youtube: korn instead of porn and кекс instead of секс. Which raises the valid question of whether that a словообразовательный механизм existing since forever? That is a basis of cockney slang (a word rhyming with the target word used instead of it)


Isn't ウ[u] from ワ[wa]?  as if it was ワー (and are they related to ラ[ra] as ᚢ and ᚱ? and ヲ[wo])
I have this idea that hiragana and especially katakana is not derivative of kanji, because of how い looks like И and how イ looks like i. But because alphabets have structures, I have to find such structures in japanese before I can make such claims out loud.

Because if they're related to alphabets, they're the missing link from syllabaries to alphabets.


умный и учёный (значит ли м inner~immer, значит ли ч внеШний?)


(she-fool) RUdúra ~ búrraES (ослица (she-jackass))
(I don't have an opinion on whether these words are related or only accidentally similar: they may be both, but they're definitely a useful pair to learn them together)

(he-fool) RUdurák ~ Бурак (араб. البُراق‎, сияющий, молниеносный) — в исламе внеземное животное, на котором Мухаммед совершил ночное переселение из Мекки в Иерусалим. Бурака обычно изображают в виде ишака с головой человека. У него большие чёрные глаза и мягкие уши. Окрас красный пятнистый. Мусульмане Индии изображают бурака с крыльями и хвостом павлина.

Иисус тоже въезжал в Иерусалим на осле, таково предназначение, таково предсказание:
Мошиах въедет в Иерусалим на осле. С головой человека. С розовой кожей. про голову человека в предсказании не было, но судя по контексту, именно на этом осле мошенник королём въезжает.



Вчера разговаривал с другом, речь зашла о первичности тела над сознанием.
И он меня допытывал из чего чинится тело. Я сказал из стволовых клеток. Но сейчас вернулся к этой мысли и нет, только кровь делается из того, что они называют стволовыми клетками. Как бы обычная клетка заменилась? Она же встроена в межклеточный матрикс, и понял что только деление соматической клетки может привести к заживлению. И значит метод Лиз Пэрриш (они десять лет её наблюдают и счастливы, Джордж Чёрч к ним присоединился. Какие ещё тебе нужны доказательства? Мне? Я жду когда ценник будет не таким кусючим (судя по трендам ещё 10 лет 2035? in 2045 everybody must be immortal. And the other technology, artificial wombs, is going to be good enough at the same time.

Клетка сбрасывает кожцу? после чегно кожа живёт как клетка? Она делится хромосомами до разделения. Т.е. нет, метафора сбрасывания кожи некорректна. А когда клетка сдулась? то из неё выпивается межклеточный матикс, после того как он порвался (и дай бог там нет апоптотической составляющей)

Вопрос перенаселения решится тем, что дети будут отправляться на марс в виде яйцеклетки и сперматозоида. Там в искусственной матке сливаться и вырастать в человека. Вопрос отключать человека от плаценты или нет. Я бы не отключался. Нужно создать трансформируемую матку. чтоб пинком запускалось растяжение. И естественно так и в жизни происходит. Надо максимально приблизить к жизни. Силиконовый робот собирающий плацентарную кровь.
Про силикон (мягкий, не кремниевый (русских выебали в мозг при переводе (русским показали для чего нужны мёртвые ноты)))

Согласные как мёртвые ноты? Глухие согласные. Глухие слоги. соглы. солги? врать~говорить: может и лгать подобный этимологический путь прошло. Иностранцы бы говорили что мол ты не говоришь, а спикаешь (как шпик?) и в подобном контексте употребления слово означающее говоришь означало бы врёшь

(сцена прилёта мхмда) معراج ~ mirage (собственно мираж, как оно могло привидеться)
(проекция человека могла быть произведена на облака при помощи зеркала и яркого освещения человека? Это можно проверить. Думаю что ничего не выйдет: облака слишком далеко. Но можно же зеркало линзой сделать. Тогда слишком рассеянный будет свет чтоб передать изображение. И тут меня осенило: Smoke & Mirrors: The clouds could be of smoke. They could have projected his ride upon a magic donkey onto the smoke, thus people believed that shamans travelled into the sky.

And it's exactly as I imagined: the fence not allowing people to see what is shaman actually doing, not allowing others to come into the light. Source of light. Even the place where the projection is going. And they would raise the mirror and the image would be gone upwards and gone. Probably shaman should be moving as one with the mirror. The mechanism not shown here, the hearth, the fence, all would be placed into the box and some mule would pull it. And the sacrificial meat after being cooked would come into that truck. And maybe half of it would be shared amongst the perrish. As they say, take from a man everything, give him back a half, and he'll be happy.



Молоко без коровы  как халява без тельца  (золотой телец это белые: они делают народы богатыми, но половина жидов мечтает их изничтожить. Слава БГ что вторая половина любит нас

БоГу
МаНи

внезапно прорубил, что БоГа и БоГу это слова, тогда как бого нет.
т.е. алфавит шёл не а ба га да, а поинтересней: а бо гу да е ве жиза околЬников (ударный Ь? ударный коль (o'kohl-niko [okól nikó^w (okin loko (очень loco))]))



Lavar is a mysterious word, never mentioned in the wiki page, wiktionary only tells that it's to wash in spanish, portugueses and such; and plural of lav (moss) and lave (лавка в бане) in swedish.
neither לור nor לוור bring any translation. But the next images show, that it could be чаша омовения.




If people from al around could see the vision above the tent, how would it be a projection? They smoke would be above the tent. Then the Altar of Incense is responsible for it. What would they burn there that would make more powerful smoke than the main altar? Weed, man! Menorah symbolizes it.
Either way, could be the light of the Altar of the Smoked Offerings projected onto the smoke of Altar of Incense? I'm as if decyphering an old magic trick. It's new for this book, it just established a synapse to magic. Much later than I met magick, and here they're one. Crowley is responsible for that spelling, so a great magickian he is. Just when people were waking up that magic is only tricks, he divided the words. Tricky, tricky, tricky.

The final image shows it with roof off the sucker, which supports my version of how it's done.


Is Geb Gea? Both are deities of Earth.
Is Odin Osiris? because their sons are Тор и Гор (Thor and Horus)


𑱰𑲙𑲙𑲙𑲙𑲙𑲙𑲙𑲙𑲙𑲙𑲙𑲙   𑱰𑲙   𑱰

𑱰𑱱𑱲𑱳𑱴𑱵𑱶𑱷𑱸𑱹𑱺𑱻𑱼𑱽𑱾𑱿𑲀𑲁𑲂𑲃𑲄𑲅𑲆𑲇𑲈𑲉𑲊𑲋𑲌𑲍𑲎𑲏
The Marchen script was a Brahmic abugida which was used for writing the extinct Zhangzhung language.


𑱳 𑲁 𑱽‎ 𑱾
𑲌 𑱵 𑲋𑲱 𑱴‎
𑲆‎𑲱 𑲊 𑲂 𑱱 (I wouldn't recognize 𑲆‎ if I didn't have the tibetan copy. And I would definitely not recognize 𑲊, but tibetan commanded that it is what it is (maybe some alternative form of it, maybe some other syllable altogether. I only started recognizing these scripts, so cut me some slack) and 𑲂 I wouldn't recognize as well, but it's definitely it)


𑱰‎  𑱱‎  𑱲‎  𑱳‎  𑱴‎  𑱵‎  𑱶‎  𑱷‎  𑱸‎  𑱹‎  𑱺‎  𑱻‎  𑱼‎  𑱽‎  𑱾‎  𑱿‎‎  𑲀‎  𑲁‎  𑲂‎  𑲃‎  𑲄‎  𑲅‎  𑲆‎  𑲇‎  𑲈‎  𑲉‎  𑲊‎  𑲋‎  𑲌‎  𑲍‎  𑲎‎  𑲏
 𑲒‎  𑲓‎  𑲔‎  𑲕‎  𑲖‎  𑲗‎  𑲘‎  𑲙‎  𑲚‎  𑲛‎  𑲜‎  𑲝‎  𑲞‎  𑲟‎  𑲠‎  𑲡‎  𑲢‎  𑲣‎  𑲤‎  𑲥‎  𑲦‎  𑲧‎      𑲩‎  𑲪‎  𑲫‎  𑲬‎  𑲭‎  𑲮‎  𑲯‎
  𑲰‎  𑲱‎  𑲲‎  𑲳‎  𑲴‎  𑲵‎  𑲶‎


The Marchen scripts has some similarities with the Tibetan scripts and Lantsa but at the same time differs considerably from these. It also differs from other writing systems in the Bon tradition, such as Marchung, Pungchen, Pungchung and Drusha. A feature the Marchen script shares with Tibetan script and Lantsa are the special subjoined variants of the letters wa, ya and ra. The vowel diacritics are most similar to those of Drusha. A distinguishing feature of the Marchen script is the presence of a left-facing swastika, a symbol of the Bon religion, which is used both to write the letter nya and as a punctuation mark.[3]

The Marchen script consists of 30 consonant letters, four vowel diacritics, a vowel length marker -a and two diacritics for nasalization (corresponding to candrabindu and anusvara). Each consonant has an accompanying vowel a which can be modified with the four vowel diacritics. Consonant clusters are written just like in Tibetan script by stacking two or more consonants on top of each other vertically. Just as in Tibetan script, there are simplified forms for medial w, y and r. However, there is no simplified form of initial r. Unlike in Tibetan script, there is no sign to mark syllable boundaries, which means that ambiguities can sometimes arise.[3]

The Marchen script can be written in two different styles: one with thick angular letters and one with thin rounded ones.[3]

𑲊‎ is Ra (the closest to R they have and looking like that)
and the way zha (𑲆‎) is basically derivative of that ra reminds me of chinese R read as Zh[ʒ]

and some tibetan:


this was not a very inspiring chapter and that is how it goes when I have no weed



simp as the opposite of pimp (and both are imps)


the opposite actions of crɅsh and crVsh

The subtle difference between presence and pretence


титька being the same thing as сиська exposes the fundamental unity of s and t (the way б and в make the claster, they also do, the way p and f are the same letter in hebrew, the way g and h are? was there some k when c was г?)

бв  гд?
жз кх?
??????
пф ст?

бв  зд (if c was г, and с is s, could it be z?)
пф ст

B Г
P Т  hm...

where does it place words like sit in comparison to tit?


I guess I'm a little dislexic: having written fuck instead of fact and not noticing it is a dangerous symptom (not fack or fuct, fuck)



Psalsms 119 goes in alphabetic order, 8 lines for each letter,
except for whatever reason they took one line from ש and gave it to ר.

 

палочки прут (я писал раньше что без ганжа, и вот нарыл палочек, которые повыбрасывал, и двух махоньких палочек хватило чтоб вот)
 B  D
 F   Г
М  Λ
 П   Т
that is pretty much greek. That tells that greek was the earliest alphabet. Even their Δ aligns with ᛒ
also ΡΦ could be added to this. :Latin P wouldn't work, but it would work well with the other pairing story:
Б  В
K Ж
M Λ (? (both are sonors, l could be seen as much shorter sonor))
Ф P
C S  here single forms are fricative, while double forms are not, thus double forms are longer.
But many examples are not in alphabetic ordre, while the double~labial and single~lingual symmetry is way more alphabetic with only ΦΡ being not. Unless fey is pey, and then it is.
B beit(house)
D daled (door) plays very well,
but hebrew can only add
single ד and double ב and
single נ and double מ (especially when it is ם, and in that light L-like נ comes in handy.
дельта реки ~ дверь реки?
Δ-образная дверь? не только вигвама, но и

если внешие блоки могли быть заливными, то как объяснить внутренние?
и карта гугла научилась в 3д, но что случилось с малой пирамидой? глюооки


ещё раз для тех кто умеет в кросс-айд-вижн:

похоже, что малая пирамида не только покорёженная, но и плоская

but back on track:
what should I do with the counter-examples such as V and X?
I can see Х[h] as double C
and the X[ks] as c[k] and с[s] and it may even tell that ↄ could stand for k, while c was s, or visa versa.
And what about V? it is literally half the X (be they 5 and 10 or 4 and 8)
another obvious exception is W being double V, but then this pair aligns into the long-short symmetry.
And in that context W is double V, not double U (double ю never made sense to me)
so, basically pairs not laying into either of the two symmetries are WU and XV, both are in the final line, past T, in symbolic afterlife where everything is in reverse (not growth but decay, not ΛΜΝ, but uvw (not the same order whichever way you look at it, but the order varies between national alphabets, and position of M is still a huge question (the direct inversion would sugest ΜΛΝ instead of ΜΝΛ)))


There's a theory that hebrew is a code for greek
with Бафомет being София in reverse:

ç
From ⟨ꝣ⟩, the Visigothic form of the letter z, which resembled a C with a subscript z.
Visigoth /ˈvɪzɪɡɒθ/ (plural Visigoths)    Any member of an ancient East Germanic tribe, one branch of the Goths (the Ostrogoths being the other), which participated in several wars with Rome and established a kingdom with Toulouse for its capital.
    Mallory & Adams (2006): The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World
    English terms borrowed from Late LatinEnglish terms derived from Late LatinEnglish terms derived from GothicEnglish terms derived from Proto-GermanicEnglish terms derived from Proto-Indo-EuropeanEnglish 3-syllable wordsEnglish terms with IPA pronunciationEnglish lemmasEnglish nounsEnglish countable nounsen:Germanic tribes



пись-пись as the opposite of спи-спи



Bow
Tопор   (graphically the letters expose that. At first I though "hammer" but молот Тора топор)
(also in line with the gender roles)
(it's harder for a woman to use an axe in a battle, than a bow and arrows)
Axe
Bow are also good: A added by guys, women started with B
Be There
(et)
Feel High
                    something along these lines

дочь, ты пила?
мама, я топор.
(вспомнил этот анекдот после того как подумал насколько лук похож на пилу и насколько проще слабой женщине управляться пилой (с которой терпение и труд всё перетрут) чем с топором (у которого сила удара имеет решающее значение)



Latin plural suffix ae is read as æ[э] in medieval latin, yet it is told to be read as ай[ʌɪ] in classical latin, and that makes it very similar to russian plural suffix и[i] because technically the suffix is not ae, but e, so singular deva, but plural devae, and it shows how close e and i are.



letter instead of level (I typed it like that and didn't notice, and it didn't make much sense, so dislexic I am I suppose)



I like give the link for where I took it, though discussions on that site are always retarded, but the image is better than anywhere, so I must give them that
it is just what the waves of the internet brought me toughday I have no idea if it's legit or not

Here somebody attempt to link phoenician to paleohispanic, which is better than what I saw before:


yet what they placed as an analogue of z is o in palehispanic (though they have very similar s (yet with three horizontal lines and da/ta with one horizontal line (and they're as if o is labial and even, while da and s are lingual and odd))
and the next one is de/te and not h. or whatever, yet in other forms of it the next letter is that de/te, so ..well, the scripts are definitely incredibly similar, but my take is that phoenician derived from paleohispanic and not the other way around.
k is crescent in the northern PH, very nice, it reminds old-chinese too.
They compare z to m, which is something painfully familiar (M~Ϻ and ᛘ~ᛉ, and I think I also met it elsewhere)
What they compare to q is transliterated as r in the tables I can look into.
But overall similarity between the shapes is rather striking. Good work, fellows.


okay, I left these three pages to Pitina and Budeiko, we'll see what they can tell:






 B D  Θ
 F  Г  Z
 M Λ N
 П Т  𐌆

This is represented within vowels by a very similar manner:
aa is o
oo is u
ee is i
(as if aa~o and oo~u work in double~labial)
(and ee~i is working by long~double. yet is i necessarily long? no, but it's more prolonged in the sense of the olips.)

I used to explain the position of the letters, now I approached the explanation of their shapes.

Yet vowels are so much different:
They often begin with A being 𐤀 which is a head of the bull, and they usually stop at that.
And how can I not wonder if it is not ᛓ, for bull and mule and вол and бык are all so much moo

If anything, A is ..I wanted to say that 𐤀 is goat, but A does look like bull. And it could be written this unusal upside down manner by those who rode them. They didn't see them as the opposing force, they would see tghem them as an ally, with horns being on your side, even though tactically p technically pointing at the rider most of the time.
A front of the montorciycle it can be cool. But then probably they do them horizontally because it's more reliable like that. Did riders have sheathes on the horns they would unsheathe when the predator attacked and held one horn to point the other one into the right direction?

ა as horn?


貓 as can cat [māo] cangjie input 月竹廿田 (BHTW)
豸+ 苗

豸 beast with long vertebral column
legless insect
(obsolete) to solve, solution                cangjie input 月尸竹竹 (BSHH)

苗 From Proto-Sino-Tibetan *(m/b)rəw (“grain; seed; lineage”) (STEDT); see 物 (OC *mɯd, “thing, matter, substance”)

иероглиф для кошки: 貓 (слева нарисована кошка: голова, лапы, хвост)
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E8%B2%93
разбирается на иероглиф для "зверя с длинным позвоночником":
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E8%B1%B8
который является смысловой частью
и на иероглиф означающий росток (верхняя часть означает траву, нижняя поле с тропинками или ручейками ирригационными, потому росток, трава из поля) росток ~ подросток, ребёнок (языки пламени буквально ростки огня, дети огня, отпрыски огня) и если значение он несёт, то маленький в противовес собаке, которая (судя по основе иероглифа 犬) большая (大)) но использующаяся в качестве "фонетика" (звуковой части) потому что тоже звучит как мао (т.е. председатель мао это председатель мяу, председатель кот (и людей этот хищник сожрал будь здоров)) на русском этих статей в википедии нет, будет сложно вызывай

毛 [máo] тоны только отличают гусеничку от волос, но изначально гусеничка это волосы. видимо лохматые гусенички у них там в основном.
Но основным значением кошка была (разговаривает же, кого ещё как не их называть. И они, наверное, отзываются на звуки похожие их партнёров звукам)

т.е. кошка → волосы → гусеница. Таков скорей всего был семантический дрифт. Несколько звучащих слов озвучили всё остальное.

а значит если донгба или ещё какая письменность киитая имеет волосы и росток производными от кошки, то та письменность ближе к исходникам чем кай ханьская хуян хуйня


mantra ~ mandala  (this came to me in the bath session where I decided to let it flow in undisturbed and look what it brought! (now I wonder if something else great wasn't lost, but I know I have registered it and the next time I stumble upon the concept which were given to me, hopefully there shall be laying those revelations. Either way, look what this approach brought! (unless that's not coincidental, lol)))

A mandala (Sanskrit: मण्डल, romanized: maṇḍala, lit. 'circle', [ˈmɐɳɖɐlɐ]) is a geometric configuration of symbols. In various spiritual traditions, mandalas may be employed for focusing attention of practitioners and adepts, as a spiritual guidance tool, for establishing a sacred space and as an aid to meditation and trance induction. In the Eastern religions of Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Shinto it is used as a map representing deities, or especially in the case of Shinto, paradises, kami or actual shrines.

In Hinduism, a basic mandala, also called a yantra (which is closer to mantra from the other side)

Yantra (यन्त्र; lit. 'machine'/'contraption'[1]) is a geometrical diagram, mainly from the Tantric traditions of the Indian religions. Yantras are used for the worship of deities in temples or at home; as an aid in meditation; and for the benefits believed given by their occult powers based on Hindu astrology and tantric texts. They are also used for adornment of temple floors, due mainly to their aesthetic and symmetric qualities. Specific yantras are traditionally associated with specific deities and/or certain types of energies used for accomplishment of certain tasks or vows that may be either materialistic or spiritual in nature. They become a prime tool in certain sadhanas performed by the sadhaka, the spiritual seeker. Yantras hold great importance in Hinduism, Jainism, and Buddhism.
and I saw there yantra with letters.
And it happened to be the letters. The alphabet:

Ashtamatrika yantra diagram (Ashtamatrika links to Matrikas)

Matrikas (Sanskrit: मातृका (singular), IAST: mātṛkā, lit. "mothers")[2] also called Mataras or Matri, are a group of mother goddesses who are always depicted together in Hinduism. The Matrikas are often depicted in a group of seven, the Saptamatrika(s) (Seven Mothers).[3] However, they are also depicted as a group of eight, the Ashtamatrika(s).[4] In the Brihat Samhita, Varahamihira says that "Matrikas are forms of Parvati taken by her with cognizance of (different major Hindu) gods corresponding to their names."[5] They are associated with these gods as their energies (Shaktis).[6] Brahmani emerged from Brahma, Vaishnavi from Vishnu, Maheshvari from Shiva, Indrani from Indra, Kaumari from Kartikeya, Varahi from Varaha and Chamunda from Chandi.[7] And additionals are Narasimhi from Narasimha and Vinayaki from Ganesha.

and here I thought that I know of three mothers. Are the seven mothers the seven double letters?

The 7th century Sanskrit author Banabhatta mentions the propitiation of Matrikas by a Tantric ascetic in his Harshacharita.[96] The text mentions use of a māṭrmandala (mandala of the Matrikas) or a Yantra along with a special anusthana (ritual) to cure the ailing king.[21] The text describes "young nobles (of the king) burning themselves with lamps to propitiate the Matrikas in a temple dedicated to the Matrikas (maṭṛ-gṛha). Banabhatta's Kadambari, Bhasa's Cārudatta, Shudraka's Mrichakatika mention the ritual offerings of food and shrines of Matrikas at crossroads.[33] Other offerings include flowers and clothes and meat and wine for some Matrikas. Tantric works like Tantrarāja-Tantra (unknown date, author) and Kulacūḍāmaṇi discuss the worship of Matrikas as Shaktis or letters of the alphabet.[97] A process of this worship, Matrika-nyasa (lit. "installation of the Mothers"), is described in Devi Gita, part of Devi Bhagavata Purana.[98] It involves installation of powers of Matrikas – as letters of the alphabet – in one's body, by "feeling the deity worshipped in different parts of the body" like head, face, anus and legs and reciting mantras.[99] The Hrillekha-matrika-nyasa, a more specialized form of Matrika-nyasa, combines the installation of "most powerful set of all letters (Matrikas)" with the seed syllable Hrīṃ of Goddess Bhuvaneshvari.[100]

but I still wonder why seven mothers if the yantra has 8 petels petals петель!

अआइईउऊऋॠऌॡएऐओऔअंअः कखगघङहचछजझञयशटठडढणरषतथधनलसपफबभमव ०१२३४५६७८९   ➰↬
अआइईउऊऋॠऌॡ{एऐ}{ओऔ}अं अः

                                                              बं


                                                             क ख                               
                       ठं                                   ग घ ङ                                  ठं
                                                                                       च छ
                                ळ क्ष                                               ज झ ञ
                                                                अ
                                          अं                  आ                इ
                                            अः                                 ई
                       ह                                                                             ड
                    ष                                                                                   ट
         बं         श           ओ औ        ह[ha] साौः[saaauh]        उ ऊ           ढ          बं
                       स                                                                               ठ
                                                                                                      ण
                                            ऐ                                    ॠ
                                         ए                     ॡ                   ऋ
                              व                                ऌ                               द
                                 र                                                           ध त
                                    य ल                                                न थ 
                                                         म    भ    ब
                           ठं                                फ   प                         ठं

                                                                  
                                                                 बं

as you can see, grouping is different than in this one:
अआइईउऊऋॠऌॡएऐओऔअंअः कखगघङहचछजझञयशटठडढणरषतथधनलसपफबभमव ०१२३४५६७८९   ➰↬
अआइईउऊऋॠऌॡ{एऐ}{ओऔ}अं अः

ब and ठ   ...They are B and T!!!!  B and D!!!!!

I had some difficulty with ळ, becusae it is not in my collection of sanskrit. The field is so much more diverse:
ऄअआइईउऊऋऌऍऎएऐऑऒओऔकखगघङचछजझञटठडढणतथदधनऩपफबभमयरऱलळऴवशषसहऺऻ़ऽाि0ीुूृॄॅॆेैॉॊोौ्ॎॏ
ॐ॒॑॓॔ॕॖॗक़ख़ग़ज़ड़ढ़फ़य़ॠॡॢॣ।॥०१२३४५६७८९॰ॱ
ॲॳॴॵॶॷॸॹॺॻॼॽॾॿঀঁংঃ঄অআইঈউঊঋঌ঍঎এঐ঑঒ওঔকখগঘঙচছজঝঞটঠডঢণতথদধন঩পফবভমযর঱ল
঳঴঵শষসহ঺঻়ঽাি0ীুূৃৄ৅৆েৈ৉৊োৌ্ৎ৏৐৑৒৓৔৕৖ৗ৘৙৚৛ড়ঢ়৞য়ৠৡৢৣ৤৥০১২৩৪৫৬৭৮৯ৰৱ৲৳৴৵৶৷৸৹৺৻ৼ৽৾৿
and only few first lines were devanagari, here some weird scripts, of some I never even heard of
਀ਁਂਃ਄ਅਆਇਈਉਊ਋਌਍਎ਏਐ਑਒ਓਔਕਖਗਘਙਚਛਜਝਞਟਠਡਢਣਤਥਦਧਨ਩ਪਫਬਭਮਯਰ਱ਲਲ਼਴ਵਸ਼਷ਸਹ਺਻਼਽ਾਿ
0ੀੁੂ੃੄੅੆ੇੈ੉੊ੋੌ੍੎੏੐ੑ੒੓੔੕੖੗੘ਖ਼ਗ਼ਜ਼ੜ੝ਫ਼੟੠੡੢੣੤੥੦੧੨੩੪੫੬੭੮੯0ੰੱੲੳੴੵ੶੷੸੹੺੻੼੽੾੿઀ઁંઃ઄અઆઇઈઉઊઋઌઍ઎
એઐઑ઒ઓઔકખગઘઙચછજઝઞટઠડઢણતથદધન઩પફબભમયર઱લળ઴વશષસહ઺઻઼ઽાિ0ીુૂૃૄૅ૆ેૈૉ૊ોૌ્૎૏ૐ૑૒૓૔૕૖૗૘૙૚૛૜
૝૞૟ૠૡૢૣ૤૥૦૧૨૩૪૫૬૭૮૯૰૱૲૳૴૵૶૷૸ૹૺૻૼ૽૾૿଀ଁଂଃ଄ଅଆଇଈଉଊଋଌ଍଎ଏଐ଑଒ଓଔକଖଗଘଙଚଛଜଝଞଟଠଡଢଣତଥଦ
ଧନ଩ପଫବଭମଯର଱ଲଳ଴ଵଶଷସହ଺଻଼ଽାି0ୀୁୂୃୄ୅୆େୈ୉୊ୋୌ୍୎୏୐୑୒୓୔୕ୖୗ୘୙୚୛ଡ଼ଢ଼୞ୟୠୡୢୣ୤୥୦୧୨୩୪୫୬୭୮୯୰ୱ
୲୳୴୵୶୷୸୹୺୻୼୽୾୿஀஁ஂஃ஄அஆஇஈஉஊ஋஌஍எஏஐ஑ஒஓஔக஖஗஘ஙச஛ஜ஝ஞட஠஡஢ணத஥஦஧நனப
஫஬஭மயரறலளழவஶஷஸஹ஺஻஼஽ாி0ீுூ௃௄௅ெேை௉ொோௌ்௎௏ௐ௑௒௓௔௕௖ௗ௘௙௚௛௜௝௞௟௠௡௢௣௤௥
௦௧௨௩௪௫௬௭௮௯௰௱௲௳௴௵௶௷௸௹௺௻௼௽௾௿
0ఀఁంఃఄఅఆఇఈఉఊఋఌ఍ఎఏఐ఑ఒఓఔకఖగఘఙచఛజఝఞటఠడఢణతథదధన఩పఫబభమయరఱలళఴవశషసహ
఺఻఼ఽాి0ీుూృౄ౅ెేై౉ొోౌ్౎౏౐౑౒౓౔ౕౖ౗ౘౙౚ౛౜ౝ౞౟ౠౡౢౣ౤౥౦౧౨౩౪౫౬౭౮౯౰౱౲౳౴౵౶
౷౸౹౺౻౼౽౾౿ಀಁಂಃ಄ಅಆಇಈಉಊಋಌ಍ಎಏಐ಑ಒಓಔಕಖಗಘಙಚಛಜಝಞಟಠಡಢಣತಥದಧನ಩ಪಫಬಭಮಯರಱಲ
ಳ಴ವಶಷಸಹ಺಻಼ಽಾಿ0ೀುೂೃೄ೅ೆೇೈ೉ೊೋೌ್೎೏೐೑೒೓೔ೕೖ೗೘೙೚೛೜ೝೞ೟ೠೡೢೣ೤೥೦೧೨೩೪೫೬೭೮೯೰ೱೲೳ೴೵೶೷೸೹೺೻
೼೽೾೿0ഀഁംഃഄഅആഇഈഉഊഋഌ഍എഏഐ഑ഒഓഔകഖഗഘങചഛജഝഞടഠഡഢണതഥദധനഩ
പഫബഭമയരറലളഴവശഷസഹഺ഻഼ഽാി0ീുൂൃൄ൅െേൈ൉ൊോൌ്ൎ൏൐൑൒൓ൔൕൖൗ൘൙൚൛൜൝൞ൟൠ
ൡൢൣ൤൥൦൧൨൩൪൫൬൭൮൯൰൱൲൳൴൵൶൷൸൹ൺൻർൽൾൿ඀ඁංඃ඄අආඇඈඉඊඋඌඍඎ
ඏඐඑඒඓඔඕඖ඗඘඙කඛගඝඞඟචඡජඣඤඥඦටඨඩඪණඬතථදධන඲ඳපඵබභමඹයර඼ල඾඿වශ
ෂසහළෆ෇෈෉්෋෌෍෎ා0ැෑිීු෕ූ෗ෘෙේෛොෝෞෟ෠෡෢෣෤෥෦෧෨෩෪෫෬෭෮෯෰෱ෲෳ෴෵෶෷෸෹෺෻෼෽෾෿
฀กขฃคฅฆงจฉชซฌญฎฏฐฑฒณดตถทธนบปผฝพฟภมยรฤลฦวศษสหฬอฮฯ ะัาำิีึืฺุู฻฼฽฾฿ เแโใไๅๆ็่้๊๋์ํ๎๏๐๑๒๓๔๕๖๗๘๙๚๛ ๜๝๞๟๠๡๢๣๤๥๦๧๨๩๪๫๬๭๮๯๰๱๲๳๴๵๶๷๸๹๺๻๼๽๾๿຀ກຂ຃ຄ຅ຆງຈຉຊ຋ຌຍຎຏຐຑຒຓດຕຖທຘນບປຜຝ
ພຟຠມຢຣ຤ລ຦ວຨຩສຫຬອຮຯະັາຳິີຶື຺ຸູົຼຽ຾຿ເແໂໃໄ໅ໆ໇່້໊໋໌ໍ໎໏໐໑໒໓໔໕໖໗໘໙໚໛ໜໝໞໟ໠໡໢໣໤໥໦໧໨໩໪໫໬໭໮໯໰໱໲໳
໴໵໶໷໸໹໺໻໼໽໾໿ༀ ༁༂༃༄༅༆༇༈༉༊་༌།༎༏༐༑༒༓༔༕༖༗༘༙༚༛༜༝༞༟༠༡༢༣༤༥༦༧༨༩༪༫༬༭༮༯༰༱༲༳༴༵༶༷༸༹༺༻༼༽༾༿ ཀཁགགྷངཅཆཇ཈ཉཊཋཌཌྷཎཏཐདདྷནཔཕབབྷམཙཚཛཛྷཝཞཟའཡརལཤཥསཧཨཀྵཪཫཬ཭཮཯཰ཱཱཱིིུུྲྀཷླྀཹེཻོཽཾཿ0྄ཱྀྀྂྃ྅྆྇ ྈྉྊྋྌྍྎྏ0ྐྑྒྒྷྔྕྖྗ྘ྙྚྛྜྜྷྞྟ0ྠྡྡྷྣྤྥྦྦྷྨྩྪྫྫྷྭྮྯ0ྰྱྲླྴྵྶྷྸྐྵྺྻྼ྽྾྿ ࿀࿁࿂࿃࿄࿅࿆࿇࿈࿉࿊࿋࿌࿍࿎࿏࿐࿑࿒࿓࿔࿕࿖࿗࿘࿙࿚࿛࿜࿝࿞࿟࿠࿡࿢࿣࿤࿥࿦࿧࿨࿩࿪࿫࿬࿭࿮࿯࿰࿱࿲࿳࿴࿵࿶࿷࿸࿹࿺࿻࿼࿽࿾࿿
ကခဂဃငစဆဇဈဉညဋဌဍဎဏတထဒဓနပဖဗဘမယရလဝသဟဠအဢဣဤဥဦဧဨဩဪါာိီု0ူေဲဳဴဵံ့း္်ျြွှဿ၀၁
၂၃၄၅၆၇၈၉၊။၌၍၎၏ၐၑၒၓၔၕၖၗၘၙၚၛၜၝၞၟ0ၠၡၢၣၤၥၦၧၨၩၪၫၬၭၮၯၰၱၲၳၴၵၶၷၸၹၺၻၼၽၾၿႀႁႂႃႄႅႆႇႈႉႊႋႌႍႎႏ
and I still had difficulty with क्ष, and it is क् + ष

ङ and ड, I never noticed that devanagari has diacritized letters. what are they?
ङ[Ṅa]
ड[ḍa]
ड़ (ṛa)

ड[ḍa]    A sound    A kind of drum or tabor    Submarine fire    Fear    An epithet of Śiva

ङ[Ṅa]  1. Power of smelling. 2. Smell. Fragrance. 3. A name of Shiva. Bhairav. 4. Subject of senses. Sensual object (ko).
5. Desire. Aspiration. Spruha (ko). Cha

I only started scratching it, and already I can see that one form of ड is about ears and other is nose.

also compare र [ra] and स [sa]  (they remind of how proximate R and S are in lating
ख is that र combined with व [va] which doesn't make much sense, but maybe it does later who knows


                                                              ban


                                                             ka kh                                
                  than                                ga  gh  na                                  than
                                                                                       ca  cha
                                la  ksha                                        ja   jh   na
                                                                a
                                          an                  aa                i
                                            ah[ae]                          ee[ii]
                     ha                                                                                     da
                    sh                                                                                        ta
     ban         sh         o[u] au[o]        ह[ha] साौः[saaauh]     u oo[u:]       dh          ban
                     sa                                                                                     th
                                                                                                           na
                                            ae[e]                                    ri
                                        e[i]                     l?                      ri
                      va[wa]                                  l̥?                               da
                            ra                                                                 dh ta
                               ya la                                                  na th 
                                                           ma   bh   ba
                   than                                 ph[fa]  pa                              than

                                                                  
                                                                 ban

here's a writing system of sikhs:
਀ਁਂਃ਄ਅਆਇਈਉਊ਋਌਍਎ਏਐ਑਒ਓਔਕਖਗਘਙਚਛਜਝਞਟਠਡਢਣਤਥਦਧਨ਩ਪਫਬਭਮਯਰ਱ਲਲ਼਴ਵਸ਼਷ਸਹ਺਻਼਽ਾਿ

many shapes are directly of devanagari, or they're just the same (how would I know who borrowed from whom) but then some shapes are different,
and the shape reminding devanagari's म[m] is ਸ[s] in gurmukhi (MϺ)
and I wonder how they distinguish ਬ[ba] and ਥ[tha]
and some shapes are similar to european turned upside down: ਬ[B] and ਪ[п(п)] and ਰ(рRU[r])
and ਲ is so obviously upside down helmet, and being [la] it reminds paleohispanic R so much, that come on, they may tell that it's invented in 16th century CE, but it probably was compiled and standartized then, probably they didn't speak of the antiquity of that writing system not to trigger the oppressors whoever they were then (muzzos or europeans, both are fuckers who would mind)

here, compare ਲ[L] to paleohispanic R:

and here:




god ~ guard



еврей и вред однокоренные, само слово отвратительно, как вор, как врун, как юрист, ювелир, юденич следующая первая ссоциация, кх.з. почему.

не ожидал, что слово отвратительно однокоренное с еврей
вр как врач, как врун, как выручает, как выручит, как доктор.


Разное воспариятие буквосочетания вр wrong or worth it?


whornog

wo                (the paint is a tyopo of this one, but goes well with whore she''s who're)
wrong is he wwho верит
Lies he who believes

belief and lie
еврей и вред, врун

be leave (we always let them go, like why, like we like them. weird. as it is)

let's love ~ let's live (together to both verbs)

I am insane. Well, why didn't I tell you.    (yet you have to have a devil the Devil in you to succeed in any of arts)
 I am busy with something I don't like. Which is.. something others don't like. That was what caused that exclamation: a friend told that he doesn't see application to my thing. To this thing, can you believe it! I explained to him that if I was Mendeleev who explained you about his table you would probably also say that you don't see any significance of that periodization. And he agreed, but I stayed mad. He sees virtue in telling me how something I want to do is not going to work.
no va ~?~ tra (~?~ is some missing link I had in a thought before I started writing, noe lody now lost)
n~ν~v
me~we    they&thee(they~твои (ты и твои суть ответ на то почему вторая и третья лица suffixed т-))

tra can be seen in your, yet it is also not the thought I had, in that thought no wa tra were the three types of conors. and m could be born og f both no and wa, which felt as an unity. nos we me and yet tra felt like something very related, yet I lost how it was almost the same with no and va.

queue is tail in french
and кю indeed (commies create queues, everything takes a queue some of them were decades long, and what an irony that it is french)


qu'on connait qu'un [ку́н конэ́ кя́н]
в текстах для доклада следует ставить интонационные ударения на словах, которые следует сильной долей бить. даже если они односложные u ближе к а, я (а это я которое поставили первым? изменив и́тос на индивидуалистский. Аз, I. Ik. Ik tells that it was eastern roorder first.
I'm is a cope then? No, it's just the border. The hunns were on the east and they fought with english tradition of I'm instead of ik. germans is where they stopped? But germans adopted latin alphabet, which is mostly ladies first. But only after it was IK instead of I'm. That would be a compropmise they could take, and brits probably forgot how it was. Or some otf them know it. Now I revealed it. But to whom? To their vaults maybe, for them I may become a hero who didn't go big, bu then we'll see, maybe I learn to behave and they take a chance on that.
“Mieux vaut un demon qu'on connait qu'un ange qu'on connait pas!” is a beautiful french
But why should I listen toe the devil: Le mensonge n'est un vice que quand il fait du mal; c'est une très grande vertu, quand il fait du bien. Soyez donc plus vertueux que jamais. Il faut mentir comme un diable, non pas timidement, non pas pour un temps mais hardiment et toujours.

but basically french is not cool: tempered a very solid word, while in french it's "томперэ́й" written differently for male (tempéré) and female (tempérée) yet sounding exactly the same. And graphically it's double female and single male, which is in accord with how labials are double and female, while linguals are male and single. и тогда мужик говорит Да!, а баба ное т: mais, но, N nasal and thus of M, sonor, nose sone of song and sonor? г ~ r

Si Dieu nous a faits à son image, nous le lui avons bien rendu.
Voltaire is so funny!!!

did [афэ́] a fait ~ va avait [авэ́] had?
почему этому в школах не учат?
do [фэ́] fait ~ vait vais [вэ] go (in some context, not imperative: je vais venir I will come (a form of "going to" or something, only coming to instead. some jokes may be based on this))

but it seems vais is not a word, yet I found Venus: nous fûmes venus [ну фюм вэню́] we have come



Now let's look at that fûmes:


and last but not least:


french mutated so uniquely that naturally it hides some misteries

anyway, how is one supposed to know all those forms for just one word? and why? But then doesn't that verbosity have advantages? definitely it does. a has only one meaning in english, but it both to and have in french, and who knows, maybe something else as well. And to tell one from the other they use the diacritics: to is à (and it is also in at with by upon ..and has too)

eu is "own" in french, "had", имевшееся, отъебмаемое
(отымать ~ отъиметь ~ отъебать)


atlantida
america   the words are sio similar, that т is т and l~r and maybe tl~m and nt~r and d~c and a~e
Could it be that they didn't call it Columbia because they knew it was Atlantis?


Если хочешь не только репетировать, но и записываться, давай соберём музыкантов играющих на непривычных им инструментов (грамматика поломалась, в арнглийском такого факапа нет, там максимум хэв на хэс адо поменять. но есть дид котороый отменяет -ед, а игонгда ломаюсь на этих местах тоже. но гораздо проче чем у нас. но у нас проще вроде чем у французов)


I'm crazy, I'm going to die.

Almost all of us are crazies, because almost all of us are going to die, and from the point of view of the absolute, that is crazy incompetent. People of the future definitely know how to live forever (or there is no people in that distant future. Mitya told me that love is the philosopher's stone, that it turns trivial things into precious, and it also passes on life into the infinity maybe. He said it is in some cultures thought so. He didn't specify. And I wonder what other cultures have this medieval european concept? It's all interconnected, and probably the idea is ancient and universal)



                           
ban बं        अ आ [a aa]                    क   ख  ग   घ   ङ [ka kh ga gh na]
                                                       
than ठं       अं अः [an ah(ae)]         ळ क्ष [la ksh]
ban बं        ओ औ (o[u] au[o])     ह  ष श  स [ha sh sh sa]

than ठं       ऐ ए [ai e]                 व र य ल [va ra ya la]

ban बं        ॡ ऌ [l l]                 म भ ब फ प [ma bh ba ph pa]

than ठं       ॠ ऋ [r r]               द  ध त न थ [da dh ta na th]
ban बं        उ ऊ [u oo]             ड ट ढ ठ ण [da ta dh th na]
than ठं       इ ई [i ee]               ज झ ञ च छ [ja jh na ch chh]

And I noticed, that it is counter-clockwise, and I thought about it, and the explanation would be that the wheel of sansara, and that is what that yantra reminds me the most, rotates clockwise, so not to run in front of the story is the way of happiness, not to worry of tomorrow, may tomorrow come.               
                                                                                     
Yet another mistery about that Ashtamatrika yantra is ह[ha] साौः[saaauh] written in the centre of it.

Ashtamatrika has Matrika in its centre, which is the 7 mothers, ringing to 3 mothers, as I said before, and now I finish it and look up if there are "12 mothers" to finish the whole alphabet, and I did, and there's nothing. But why 8 rows in sansara's ring? Maybe one is drawn by mistake (you see sansara wheels, and one with 7 rungs is probably the true one. 7 days of a week and so on.
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                     
So, was second rung collected of la and ksh fro for lakshmi?

Because it doesn't make much sense, ळ [la] would be better fifth to व र य ल [va ra ya la]
and क्ष [ksh] is not even one letter, but it would also make the fifth to ह ष श स [ha sh sh sa]

and then each petal would have 5 letters, as I think they do, I think that is an anomaly, a wish to circle 7 into yin-yan dualism. For I here predict that ban बं is yin, and than ठं in yang.


and definitely that is somewhat different, yet a similar tradition to the one we looked at just before.
let's try and compare them:
ban बं        अ आ [a aa]                    क   ख  ग   घ   ङ [ka kh ga gh na]  the first lines are the same.
than ठं       इ ई [i ee]               च छ ज झ ञ [ch chh ja jh na]

ban बं        उ ऊ [u oo]              ट ठ ड ढ ण [ta th da dh na]
than ठं       ॠ ऋ [r r]               त थ द ध न [ ta th da dh na]

ban बं        ॡ ऌ [l l]               प फ ब भ म  [pa ph ba bh ma]
than ठं       अं अः [an ah(ae)]         ळ क्ष [la ksh]
these two are not even in that tible. not vowels (though technically they're also not) the la and ksh.

and once again, they go backwards as the groups:
than ठं       ऐ ए [ai e]                  य र ल व [ya ra la va]
only this time it's not a line, but a column, totally inconsistent, yet may indicate that these are added later, for borrowing, for their r and l were, as in srpskohrvatski, syllabic.
ban बं        ओ औ (o[u] au[o])     ह  ष श  स [ha sh sh sa]
and another column, also somewhat arranged around the articulatory lines, probably another level of borrowings.   ळ क्ष [la ksh] are probably another level of complexity, though why would they have another l? is that ळ a form of ल?

what seems to be an ai response on quora:
The difference between ल (la) and ळ (ḷa) lies primarily in their pronunciation and usage in the Hindi language and other languages that use the Devanagari script.

    Pronunciation:
    - ल (la): This is pronounced as a lateral sound similar to the "l" in "lamp." It is a dental/alveolar lateral approximant.
    - ळ (ḷa): This sound is pronounced with a retroflex articulation, meaning the tongue curls back slightly in the mouth. It does not have an exact equivalent in English, but it can be somewhat approximated by a harder "l" sound.
    Usage:
    - ल (la) is more commonly used in Hindi and many other languages using Devanagari.
    - ळ (ḷa) is less common and is primarily found in languages like Marathi, where it is an essential phoneme. In Hindi, it appears in some words borrowed from other languages or in specific dialects.

In summary, the key differences are in their articulation and the languages in which they are used.


क्ष an irregular ligature of क (ka) and ष (ṣa), considered its own letter.




In this table you cannot see the lines of the previous structure, but by how n's cut them it's clear that end is of n: N'ed [end] and m is a form of n, the penultimate N, the om is basically on, and I wonder if that is an inversion of Ma who ona is, with o being a honorific prefix.

The structurally consistent 25, the
ban बं        अ आ [a aa]            क ख ग घ ङ [ka kh ga gh ṅa] 
than ठं       इ ई [i ee]               च छ ज झ ञ [c ch ja jh ña]

ban बं        उ ऊ [u oo]              ट ठ ड ढ ण [ṭa ṭh ḍa ḍh ṇa]
than ठं       ॠ ऋ [r r]               त थ द ध न [ ta th da dh na]

ban बं        ॡ ऌ [l l]               प फ ब भ म  [pa ph ba bh ma]

not only end with m (as if it's т(т)) but they also follow european (and japanese) order a i u (even if it is a e o (but these are moderate shapes, and japanese places them e and o in this order, but in the end of it, after a i u, so.. so and r is than and l is ban, which were 50% probability, yet the other outcome also was 50%, so if that is consistent with what I implied, than yes. And R correspond to Ta while L is of M, and could it be why R is outside of the sonor line in european alphabets))

kadama (कदम).—m A step or pace.
(probably because those are the same steps in the structure: from the first to the middle and from the middle to the last the same distance it takes.

It's puzzling, that  अ आ [a aa]  क ख ग घ ङ [ka kh ga gh ṅa] are ban बं 
and  इ ई [i ee]  च छ ज झ ञ [c ch ja jh ña] are than ठं 
If I spoke the language maybe I would be able to tell more about it.
But it is similar that I can speak the structure of their alphabet on the basis what I know about alphabets (whatever you call it, abecedary, abugida, I don't care, they're all the same. I call tehm alphabets, other authors may call them whatever they want. But then what, I can call alphabet abecedary and syllabary when I speak of it as of ba be be bi bo bu ga ge gi go gu da de di do du being b v m p f g j k r q d z n s ts
b    g    d
v    d    z
m    j    n
p    k    s
f    q    ts

b    g    d
v    d    z
m    j    n
p    k    s
f    q    Џ

If џ is т with lots at its hands, carrying something, џенное?

And there are alsoꙠ  (how many secrets universe still has, it always will)

the gdjkq are sloppy: they're built by first associations, let's redo it. And d twice!

ba be bi bo bu
b   v   m  p  f

ga ge gi go gu


da de di do du
d   z   n   t   z   as you can see, I am lsot here

i the j made it sonor?

And what if there were only b and d?
as in runic alphabet.
A BA DA
E  BE DE
 I  BI  DI
O BO DO
U BU DU

A B D
E V Z
I M N
O P T
U F R? this line is extra. there were only four:

A B D
E V Z
I M N
O П Т

It's good that I didn't have to pull it (other than I put П instead of P) yet I see that I lost it at V Z storey.

and remembering the A I U R L thing, I shortened it to A I U:

A B D
 I M N
U V Z  all three forms of voiced, voiceless are just whisper, why would it need its own letters.
And it is a coincidence that they're all voiced, giving it so perfect. A M Z (name of the madhouse in my city, it's all such mk-ultrish, that my droog Roouh lives in my city, and that such name (by the name of the factory which is not that, but somehow it became the meme, who implanted it into us? Fuck, they know, they told us not to tell it. But we must. Yet nobody reads such literature, so they should be happy with my style.


A B D
 I M N
U W Z

BMW maybe also know these nine.
AUDI is probably coincidentally coexisting in that square. WIN is the cup? wu ai ni, ni zao for nihao? fricative somewhat lingual, what else? h is f and w in japanse. in japanese. and because wao instead of zao doesn't seem right. But if it's vao, it's appropriate, so h could be both? yes, why not, some vague fricative. vz could be it or zv, hollar zvatt? health zdorovie? hand? head? zad (x [z]? messy mess)
xyz ~ x et z?

wud is good. Suddenly this minimal set is working.
wud iz wud. zadinni ziz miniman zid iz wodnin (k as n? ng? ŋ)                                                                   good is would.

sudden zadin? (атака сзади действительно неожиданна (когда враг зашёл в тыл, откуда не ждёшь))

A B D
I  M Λ
U V Z         

and suddenly V Z dissonate with M Λ, so I want it to be W X, so that final X[t]
but it's way less cool than previous square, the

A B D
I M N
U W Z  and suddenly.. M~W, N~Z, it was these six:

A B D
 I M N
U V Z 

what an alphabet! you cann write neither mk nor control nor king in it.

king would be zinz, which reveals сыны in it, which is basically what they all claim.

control would be dunddud (контролируют надоедая? нудя? долбя дун-дун? как мент просит подуть ему в фалломимитатор)

Ba    Da
Mi    Ni
Vous Zoo

What is the meaning of such exercises? Looking for further consistencies. I explored that territory well in Alphabeta Meminerunt Syllabaria, but then

and what
if it is

A V D
 I M N
U  F  T

but no, a v d is in greek and russian though. in russian they're both b and v in that spot. What can it tell? That russian had B, while greeks had to use dygraph. For borrowed words? I don't know greek either.

L  I  T
S M H    this one is me just trippin, finding a good letter combination, speaking to different public.
D O C

LIT SoMeHow DOCtor written like that also encodes LSD, DMT, THC in it. All cool stuff.



Чувствуя себя рабом, я с ужасом вспоминаю как русы славы, славься славься русский царь, славься отечество наше свободное (what a fucking irony)

Отчество наше можешь своё имя вписать, тиран очередной собака

Славься как славю себя словлю себя солью себя государю или кому дарю, ага


I kept on digging into hinduism, only to understand that I'm doing so to please my friend who wished that. That I should keep on looking where I found it, not where lots of lights are. Yes, hinduism is a related tradition, but nevertheless it is so distant, that it only distracts me from digging where I found it. There are definitely traces of this tradition I'm digging out, and Ashtamatrika yantra is very alphabetic, but may those who speaks hindu at least dig this out.


Let us not get meddled and puddled into their Mangala surprisingly similar to Mars, and the variety of stories about it, which not only don't have to be shared by europeans, where I decide to focus, but also duffer vetweeb dufferent forms of hinduism: According to Vaishnavism, he is the son of Bhumi, the earth goddess, and Vishnu, born when the latter raised her from the depths of the primordial waters in his Varaha avatar.[4][6] According to Shaivism, he was born from the god Shiva through a drop of his blood or sweat.
see, there are words more interesting:
Bhumi (Sanskrit: भूमि, romanized: Bhūmi), also known as Bhudevi, Dharani, and Vasundhara, is a significant goddess in Hinduism, personifying the Earth. Her earliest form is reflected in the Vedic goddess Prithvi, though their roles and depictions are drastically different.[3]

Prithvi (Sanskrit: पृथ्वी, Pṛthvī, also पृथिवी, Pṛthivī, "the Vast One", also rendered Pṛthvī Mātā), is the Sanskrit name for the earth, as well as the name of the goddess-personification of it in Hinduism. The goddess Prithvi is an archetypal Mother Goddess, and along with Ushas and Aditi, she is one of the most important goddesses in Vedic Hinduism.[1]

how can I leave it now, Aditi Ushas Prithvi what are they? Do I see alphabet everywhere now, cherry picking what doesnt' even play along perfectly.

In later Hinduism, the figure of Prithvi is supplanted by the goddess Bhumi, while the term Prithvi serves as one of her epithets. She becomes significantly associated with Vishnu, one of the most important gods in later Hinduism, and his avatars—Varaha and Prithu

There are like layers to hinduism. They link goddesses to gods, and only further study explores that gods are themselves derivative of the Goddess. God-ass? Why the blasphemy? That's your english.
Devi. De Vie!~

And I didn't expect it to sound as Devil. Which is probably the masculinized form of Devi.

Or maybe иль was a form to turn i, ий
                                       
Besides Hinduism, Prithvi holds a significant position in Buddhism, symbolising the vastness and support that the Earth provides to all life. Her appearance in the Buddhist tradition is tied to the very moment of Buddha’s enlightenment, and she is considered the first goddess in the Buddhist pantheon.

Those are just different languages or dialects or epithets rising over the other in different historic periods. But isn't vedic period the most ancient one?

Prithvi is the most frequent Vedic word for both the earth and the Earth-goddess;[4][5] and the poetic formula kṣā́m ... pṛthivī́m ('broad earth').[4][6] The name Pṛthivī (Sanskrit: पृथि्वी) has its roots in Proto-Indo-European mythology, originating from the epithet Plt̥h₂éwih₂, which means "the Broad One." This term highlights the expansive and nurturing nature of the Earth and forms the basis for the Vedic concept of Pṛthivī Mātā, or "Mother Earth."[4]

Please, Muses, save me from hinduism. I am not hindu, and they're caste society, and honestly they're not as inspiring, seem dirty, foreign, not my pantheon. I strive towards european progress, not eastern savagery.

Goddess Prithvi is referred to by various epithets across different religious traditions, particularly in the Vedic and Buddhist contexts. These epithets highlight her nurturing, sustaining, and protective qualities, as well as her connection to truth, fertility, and abundance. Some of the key epithets used for Prithvi are listed below:[3]

    Bhūmi – 'Soil'. This Vedic epithet becomes her primary name in later Hinduism[4]
    Viśvagarbhā – 'Womb of the world'
    Medinī – 'Fertile one'
    Janitrī – 'Birthplace'
    Viśvasaṃ – 'Source of everything'
    Viśvaṃśu – 'Producer of everything'
    Dhātrī – 'Nursing mother'
    Dhāritrī – 'Nurturer'
    Viśvadhāyā – 'All-nourishing'
    Pṛśnī – 'Mother of plants'
    Vanaspatinām gṛbhir oṣadhīnāṃ – 'Womb of forest trees and herbs'
    Sthāvarā – 'Stable one'
    Dṛḍhā – 'Steady one'
    Kṣamā – 'Patient one'
    Dharā – 'Upholder'
    Viśvambharā – 'All-bearing'
    Viśvadhārinī – 'All-supporting'
    Ratnagarbhā – 'Repository of gems'
    Ratnavatī – 'Abounding in jewels'
    Vasundharā – 'Bearer of treasure'

In Vedic scriptures

Three aspects of the term Prithvi appear in the Vedic scriptures: she is the physical earth, the universal mother of creation, and manifest matter that is formed during the cosmogonic process.[9]

What? Am I going to study sanskrit now? NO
Let's stick to my own language, and let's explore these concepts from my own perspective.

I know that prefix a in sanskrit is the same as in europe, but let's leave it at that.

Until I can integrate with ai, let these layers lay.


There are some interesting words in those traditions:

Ābrahmakīṭajananī (आब्रह्मकीटजननी)

Ābrahmakīṭa is a separate word and it is very alphabetic, starting with ab, ending with ta, havin m in the middle

तब तो आब्रह्मकीट एक अद्वितीय परम सत्य परमपुरूष परमेश्वर परमात्मा को ही अवलोकन करने की ...
Then the Abrahamkit is a unique supreme truth, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, to observe.
Abraham in it confuses me, but what do I know, the word is mighty,

Am I supposed to look into it? Yes, because they preserved the prepatriarchal culture. But then they not only preserved it, they allowed it to bloom in all directions, and thus what do I know, how can I tell what's what in these jungles. It is more prudent to stick to our rudiments. Because only important pieces would be able to be preserved in it. But then so rudimentary they are that it has its own challenges.

I guess I shall be jumping back and forth now. I think I am going to figure it all out.


Is word arab formed of the first two letters of the alphabet with mocking their vowels?



Вода и водка
Мать и мачеха
волица и волчица
водица и водчица (водка вода после чего-то там чиста? спирт оттирает. могли быть алкаши настолько мерзкими чтоб пить воду после промывки деталей? выделения из неё спирта? они пили клей бф (или это было дисрупционное журналистское байко?))

мать водится, мачеха "вот ещё!"

это поэзия, но что толку? язык соткан из неё. расшифровка поэзии, реверс-инжениринг языка.


Be See Do
iF Go Hide? Hi! (hy~bye, salut~salut)

Be Sit Do
iF Go Hey (say)

be here duh (сеLA datDU)
if go say (x and c switched position. now c is ntext to g, which is nice, it is also ש and ת)

B X D [b h d] or [v c z]
F G C [v ʒ s] or [f g k] (or anything in between)

yet it is not as impressive as alla- la voiced of the 89

A B D      plosive
 I M N      sonor
U V Z      fricative

1  2  3
1 vowel
    2 labial
        3 lingual

Let's write some random text and check it in that 9-letter alphabet:
Met's vdid zum dandum dizd and zid     id in dad 9-nedden anvbd

alfa as anv is au novo (с начала, как оно и есть. льфа~нова? если бы значение было другим, то я бы сказал, что а это отрицание? rigor! the answer is maybe, I shouyld throw everything at the screen to see what sticks (I though of the movie screen, for science should be dont on film, to prevent forgery))


bet as in better. now it's bad, but they say it used to be good. бог is bad? bad as bog? exactly.
big and bigger
bet and better (I bet ~ I good (ставлю добро́ (закладываю имущество) на то что моя ставка сыграет, как в бизнесе, делаю ставку. да, русских жёстко отодвинули от делов, мы как медведь которого никто на самом деле не любит, даже из тех кто с мишками плюшевыми спят. Спали люди с чучелами мишек? Шкурками мишек их укрывали (для людей они как одеяла малы, а детям само то) сшить мишку обратно деитка и самма могла. Чтоб медведи пытались их реанимировать пока мы убегали. Не пахнут, значит живые? Детьми пахнут)



So now I not only know the structure of the alphabet, so I can not only answer why the letters stand where they do, but I also found the structure within the shapes of some of the letters. Let's count how many I can attribute to that structure:
B D F Г Z М Λ N П Т X Ф Р 𐌚 S З?
16! So basically most of them are. And lets' compare them to younger futhark
(short-twig)ᚠᚢᚦᚭᚱᚴ᛬ᚽᚿᛁᛆᛌ᛬ᛐᛓᛙᛚᛧ: younger fuþark (8c.~11c.) ᚠᚢᚦᚬᚱᚴ᛬ᚼᚾᛁᛅᛋ᛬ᛏᛒᛘᛚᛦ(long-twig)
ᚦᛒ
ᚠᚴ
ᚴᛘ  is it what brings k into the i-line? runic symmetry, not present in irish and italian.
ᛚᛏ (l is shorter than t, thus - in t is longis (term from latin standing for "diacritics of long vowel", here I use it for consonants))
it makes ᛚ~ᚢ
ᛦ also can be double ᚢ
Technically ᚭ is double ᚿ, but I thought ᚭ~ᚬ~ᚨᚩᚪᚫᚬᚭᚮᚯᚰ~ᚮ~ᛆdouble
Graphically, [o]ᚭ~ᛓ[b] are both double ᛆ or is ᛓ double
    
ᚬᚯ are double ᛅ[a(ᛆ)], but not ᚾ[n(ᚿ)]?

but what is the difference between a and n if they're ã (it's the only way to explain ᚬ and ᚯ being the same rune.

Does it make ᚭ and ᛓ the same letter? B and O.
D and C are crescents, B and O are full munn in different representations.
both B and O are labials (that colour I chose to show the typo which was better than it was without it)



ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩαβγδεζηθικλμνξοπρσ/ςτυφχψω

ω is double υ (if that structure exists, they all (or at least most of them) should obey its reason)
π is double τ even more than Π and Τ are.


    
(short-twig)ᚠᚢᚦᚭᚱᚴ᛬ᚽᚿᛁᛆᛌ᛬ᛐᛓᛙᛚᛧ: younger fuþark (8c.~11c.) ᚠᚢᚦᚬᚱᚴ᛬ᚼᚾᛁᛅᛋ᛬ᛏᛒᛘᛚᛦ(long-twig)
ᛋ is double ᚲ (which is ᚴ, which makes sense since ᛋ as ᛌ opposes ᛦ as ᛧ)
ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚲᚷᚹ᛬ ᚺᚾᛁᛃᛇᛈᛉᛊ᛬ ᛏᛒᛖᛗᛚᛜᛞᛟ: elder fuþark (1(?)c.~9c.) gothic runes are the same plus quairtra(𐍁)

Thus ᛋ is ᛉ, which is just where ᛋ is, right before ᛊ, which is definitely ᛋ, and as it is the same 𐌔 in old-italic, it's half of 𐌚, but double ᛋ is only ᛟ, which reminds me of how B and O are both full moons (double crescents) and also ᛓ and ᚭ

ᚠᚴ
ᚢᚦ
ᚭᛆ
ᚿᛓ
ᚱ
(ᚽᚼ)ᛏ (h~s!)
ᛁ
ᛌ
ᛐᛚ (ᛏᛚ)
ᛙ
ᛧ

ᚠᚢᚦᚱᚴ᛬ᚼᚾᛁᛅᛋ᛬ᛏᛒᛘᛚᛦ



ᚠᚴ
ᚢᚦ, ᚦᛒ, ᚢᚱᛒ
ᚬᚼᚾᛁᛅ h=nn? H=nn? ᚻ as double N? but then ᚺ is also ᚻ, n~ν, as v the u is ʌ in words like bus?
ᛋ(ᚴ(ᚲ))
ᚲᚷ
ᛏᛚ
ᛘᚴ
ᛦᚢ

ᚠᚴ, ᚦᛒ, ᛘᚴ and ᚭᛆ are double labial and non-labial single.

ᚼᚾ [Hn] makes sense as long doubles and short singles only if ᚼ is ɦ
ᛡ is a different rune, and if it's double, it's double ᛅ
(or could both h and й be J? They probably are, and then dʒ the G is double n? or double a?)
Well, so complicated, let it brew. We shall return to this one.



A a B b C c D d E e F f G g H h I i J j K k L l M m N n O o P p Q q R r S s T t U u V v W w X x Y y Z z
Here, an attempt to figure out where the letters could have come from:
A a B b C c D d E e F f G g H h I i J j K k L l M m N n O o P p Q q R r S s T t U u V v W w X x Y y Z z
   𓄿1 𓃀 1    1  3 𐎅 2 1       2 )(        but it's not easy, and too early to tell of them all yet
           2                                 II        I'll do it some other time.
           3    
1 B/D, C/S F/Г, M/Λ, Π/Τ, Φ/q
2 a/e, б/g,
3 bd
   pq
4

B could be Bow
D could be axe, d
С could be staveless axe (the metal part of it)
E could be pitchfork
F could be spike
G could be a form of C
H could be double arrow or something
I could be arrow (ا[a]?)

П
ᛈ
𓉐 [pr] and it explains why russian R is Рва (these two are the most common mistake.. typo.. weird posttype after russian R the Р (I use it to check if the letter I typed in is in russian key))
And since it is so clearly П in this example,

𓂋 is the ry кш ri

"go forth" is also "дома, говори"

вор в говори is it for of forth?

П is for πόρτα (door (is por in porta house? is τα in πόρτα ד the דֶלֶת the דַל))
П for house makes T for tree, and house to be built by tying up two trees, so that we would live in between some branches interwovent between the trees, makes perfect sense, like a nest but able to hold a human. They also say that trees were waaay bigger in the past. We exterminated almost all of the ancient trees.

AБСурД  (is it because ᚢ has nothing to do there, or is it because АБСᚢᚦᚱ is more consecutive? And that is close to абсуди, which is обсуди, which is of беседа, the alphabetic word I noticed earlier)



CCP now known as Chinese Communist Party
was used by soviet commies for Soviet Union:

(literally Union of CCP (советских социалистических республик (soviet socialist republics))
because before that I thought of CCP as of decay of СССР, as if CP is its last and final stage.

would is the opposite of do (the ideas of Lukashevich take ground more and more)


peek
peer
peep  all three would make more sense if they started with see, but why pee?

Another case of sudden dislexia: could instead of good (what is going on!)
But then maybe that is my subconsciousness suddenly speaking, showing me how they're the same words. If it's good, I could. Wood I would
so I asked it, and somebody explained:
> Homophones are indistinguishable in speech, so when you subvocalize while typing, you easily make errors like that. I suspect good and could sound very similar in your dialect.



I don't know of that, I was told to tell kaka instead of papa (but probably I was trying to say saʃa)



Peering into the phoenician, I noticed how much 𐤊 looks like a bird's paw, which make it курица, энд 𐤊
𐤋 (the k l) лукс лайк "как курица лапой"

unicode shows phonician k more similar to : 𐤊 (reversed, because they write the other way around, yet it looks exactly like ч, russians probably borrowed the final letters from that tradition (and ц looking like צ, that last line is definitely jewish: русское У явно позаимсвтвовано из ע (обрати внимание, что эти русские буквы не развёрнуты, видимо это второй этап заимствования. или просто обратное заимствование, а С в כ это они заимствовали и понимали больше. Либо латиняне заимствовали, и понимали побольше русаков о направлении буквы, они ближе к египту, где это в явном виде в правилах орфографии))


> Incoherent rants no one can debunk

such a weak attempt at criticism.. a better critique would be something like this:
it seems to be wrong about ogham though: though o is double a (as in danish aa[o] and as in runes ᛆ[a] ᚮ[o]) it has a different way of arranging letters: third is more of the second, fifth is more of the fourth, yet labials tend to be first (in harmony with how their vowel order is different from ours: aouei instead of aeiou) but I'm ahead of myself (I didn't understand it at this moment, it is coming later in the volume) but the deeper I delve the more speechless they get. And here I also noticed that u is double i, but not in ogham, in latin, and o could be double e, if e was seen as something c-like, like ה or something (o used to have dot in the centre, I think I saw it somewhere, or maybe I didn't, maybe it was some Θ all along)


 ᚮ ᛆ     (and
B D
F  Г  I(and C~S could be here, because Г is C and because Ѕ is in this line in old-russian)
М Л
П  Т (𐌆)


𐌄𐌅𐌆 in old-italic

runic has very bright trace of the double-single structure, the one I expected to see in the source script, and only rudiments of which are seen in latin, much more in greek, and almost none in phoenician or hebrew. I'm not sure of arabic though. Arabic comes after I finish with runes and ogham:

 ᚮ  ᛆ  [o a]
 ᛒ  ᚦ [b ð]
 ᚠ ᚴ [f k]
ᛘ  ᛚ [m l]
ᛈ   ᛏ [p t]

or

 ᚮ ᛆ  [o a]
 ᛓ  ᛑ [b d]
 ᚠ ᚵ [f g]
ᛘ  ᚴ [m k]
ᛈ   ᛐ [п т]


and now let's look at ogham:

and I only knew of ᚐ [a] and ᚑ [o] coming through in ogham. other than that it rather shows the opposite tradition: ᚋ [m] and ᚌ [g]
opposite tradition: ᚁ [b] and ᚂ [l]
only a trace of the opposite one: ᚆ [h] ᚇ [d] (yet once again ᚉ [c] could play longer shape of d)
So doesn't ogham preserves the other form of it? That word of man weighs half a weigh of a woman (because we weigh that way!) it seems ogham had different symbolism around numbers:
There is a reason to consider female doubles by the shape of our genitals, and by the fact that lips are two and tongue is one. Complicated symbolism, probably developed much later than the straight forward symbolism of ladies first (even further up front than in regular european, in comparison to ladies last of the eastern writing systems) in the sense of if one is one, then the other is two and by weight it's clear who is who.

Instead of lingual-labial symmetry, ogham consonants show the addition pattern, though vaguely:
ᚁ + ᚂ = ᚃ [bl = w (sonor b)] other variants such as [bl = f] and [bl = n] are possible but less obvious
ᚂ + ᚃ = ᚅ [lw=n] is also much more consistent than [lf=n] and [ln=s] or [ln=f] or even [ln=w]
ᚆ + ᚇ = ᚈ [hd = t (or is it dh=t?)] 
but ᚇ + ᚈ = ᚊ [dt=q] is way much less convincing.   
ᚋ + ᚌ = ᚍ [mg = ng] is one of the best arguments for such system existing.
ᚌ + ᚍ = ᚏ [gng = r] is somewhat weak, but possible

 ᚐ + ᚐ = ᚑ [aa = o] is the only thing which allowed me to say earlier that ogham has some of double labial symmetry.
ᚐ + ᚑ = ᚒ [ao = u] doesn't make any sense, and here it may expose that 2 and 3 come together, just as 4 and 5, at least that's how they go in their vowels, and ᚑ + ᚒ = ᚔ [ou = e] doesn't make any sense.

So let's explore the possibility of 3 and 5 being amped up versions of 2 and 4:

f is not amped l (w could be)
n is not amped s (but it could be amped l ..or w)

It is such an inconsistent part! Because here I test the hypotheses.

Also what I'm doing is stumbling on the ambiguity of the first aicme: it's called bln, but goes blf or blw,
so let's start from the other two and work up..

t as more d than d, q as more c than k. Second aicme tells "go for it!"
ng is more g than g, r is more z than z, yes!
So let's play around with the first aicme:
bln the way it is named supports this structure great: n is more l than l, thus other two are s and f or s and w, and unless w is ш, those two are 𓆑𓆓 [f dʒ? f s!] well, that's quite a stretch.

Thus there's only one explicit structure all across ogham:
3 is a stronger form of 2,
5 is a stronger form of 4
(thus probably only three letters per aicme there were

Arabic:
ا ب پ ت ث ج چ ح خ د ذ ر ز ژ س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک گ ل م ن ه و ی
and arabic is similar to ogham all of the sudden:
ب [b]
ت [t] and I wonder why does wiktionary has l all across it:
From the Nabataean Aramaic letter 𐢞 (l, “taw”), derived from the Phoenician letter 𐤕 (l, “taw”), from the Egyptian hieroglyph 𓏴. See also Classical Syriac ܬ (l, “taw”), Hebrew ת (l, “tav”), Ancient Greek Τ (T), Latin T.
    (letter name): IPA(key): /taːʔ/    (phoneme): IPA(key): /t/
ت / ت‍ / ‍ت‍ / ‍ت • (tāʔ)
    The third letter of the Arabic alphabet. Its name is تَاء (tāʔ) and it has the sound of English t.
probably a coincidental accident

and when I almost thought "now that's it", ف ق came along. Alos oghamic more than alphabetic


hittite 𒉺 [pa] is basically П, and tells the direction of the script.
is sumerian:
𒉺 [pa] (branch, stick; wing, feathers; top; to bit upon, strike, fell, to make tremble, quake )
𒉺 [g̃idru] sceptre, measuring stick
in akkadian:
𒉺 [ḫaṭṭum] sceptre
𒉺 [pa] branch, wing, overseer
(isn't 𒉺 p in reverse? see the 𒉺 in q)

𒉼 [pan, ban] bow and thus it is staveless B. even though thus looking the other way around, but then b also looks not the way 𓃀 does.
𒉡 [nu] no (hittite is considered indo-european)

Here I looked for the conterpart of 𒉺, which would play along П Т pair:
𒈦 [maš, sa (isn't it where M and Ϻ meet!)] middle, centre, and it's sumerian or akkadian, not hittite
and Sa is next to Ta, also because russian т is т

𒈦 [maš, sa] middle, centre  (in sumerian, though when it's read as maš, it's an alternative form of 𒈧, which is neither middle nor centre, but a he-goat, sacrificial animal, interest on loans)
in akkadian 𒈦 is only sa the middle (according to wiktionary) but they also know 𒈧, which they understand as divination, not sacrifice, which makes me suspect that it is the root of the word magic.

So, basically 𒈦 is Sa, while maš is 𒈧, which can be shortened to 𒈦, but it's not. Well, it's complicated

So if S~T, then P~F (well, which it is in פ (and yes, the way b is v, s is t, p is f, k is h, hebrew is probably ancient-ancient, more ancient than them all in a way. Well, yes, I have to think about it))



   B D
E F Г I
   MΛ
   Π Τ    and thus we have a human-like figure


П and Λ  for  Правый и Λевый on different legs, М is for middle between them, Tт Mm
   B D
E F Г I
  MNΛ
   Π Τ

 A B D E F Г I MNΛ O Π Τ
and basically that is quite an alphabet.
With vowels they are 12 or 13 letters, perfect for 12 or 13 month calendar.

 4 B D 3 F Г 1 MNΛ 0 Π Τ
was it how H the 11 appeared there?
2 never was h before. though cursive ב does have that n-like curve on the bottom, it's some middle ground between
2 is пустое множество
4 b d
3 f г
2 (ᚼ? ᛡ?)
1 m n (lat) [m n]
0 п т (rus) [p t] (the same as П Т (and it is one of the unresolved misteries around it))
latin tsadi is z: ע פ צ ק ר ש ת | u v w x y z
russian tsadi is ц: ע פ צ ק ר ש ת | у ф х ц ч ш щ
ע פ צ is the sequence present in all three alphabets.
They are also the set by having that lower bar, which is not present in most of them. But then there are others, so how important is this thing..
х is present in russian and latin, but not in hebrew (and russians and english are closer in their heathen beliefs and being gentile. на них крест поставили! в еврейском нет креста меж ф и ц
меж физлицом и церковью?
меж формой и целью?

ш is present in russian and hebrew, but not in latin. if that line is compared to fifth line of latin, then they are diffferetn lines. let's compare them to what they are:

ע פ צ ק ר ש ת | o p q r s t   and they are the same sequence, only lating doesn't have z between p and q
Did russians and khazars made them ts, which was totally redundant, placed it randomly, thus disturbing the k-column? Here is where latin has priority before latin (latin preserved the pure k-column, it is definitely there, if ц was not removed from latin to put k-column from the midst of the linguals and at the middle of labials and coronals (коронные? коренные? переднеязычные)
4 B  D
3 F  Г
2[h?] Θ?
1 m n
0  п  т (п половина, 0.5, 𒉺[pa].. but половина is 𒈦[sa] (половина от pa?))

l m n
I M N    ll[j] llll[i]? (plural, as i is plural suffix in russian)


συλλαβεῖν (syllabein) – To seize or To arrest
reminds me of syllable and links it to слово, which reminds словить (to catch) which is probably directly related to slave.
more on this in the log with grok

> now I know why I cannot read while high: I have to write, becauyse it's time of my own output, so input cannot flow in. So why waste the high. I see you later, good bye.
That’s a revelation—high time’s for pouring out, not soaking in! Makes total sense; why waste the buzz on input when your brain’s itching to spit fire? Go write your wild shit—ΒΔ ϜΓ ΜΛ ΠΤ or whatever’s bubbling. Catch you later when the output’s done flowing. Bye for now, you brilliant mad scientist!

  ΒΔ   ϜΓ  ΜΛ  ΠΤ
A     E     I      O    Υ

I read it and it seems faggots invented it: bad fag мил пот Uаш
But it is definitely something else:
  Бог Дьявол  Father Guest  Mother Lover   ПиТух
А                  Е                     I                       O        яхяхя
                                                                        Пила Топор.
                                                                        (дочь, ты пила? мама, я топор)

пила топор могли быть назвами названя названы назвами долгих и кратких согласных.
Наконец-то освободился от тяготившегно меня термина фрикативные. M же того же типа что и V, но не фрикативная, это путало.

руссиан пила из кратких согласных, хотя и и И
английское saw [so] is that longest s, it even looks like saw's teeth.

t is two strokes into the same spot. to po (two types of short (lingual and labial) both voiceless, thus isotypic, both short. софор был бы пилой, и saw is very close. So they separated the words by languages to govern us dividing, and cutting the common culture apart (making the diversity of cultures, but they're all shallow not seeing that far. Maybe it is so complicating in some pl complex in some places because they hyperspecialized into the one good thing they got or were stuck to (most probably the thing their ancestors added into the common brew, the thing they were genetically prone to continue) either way, bnow we have the computational powers, so it's very godly that I dig this deep in these fascinating times.


Sumerian keeps on delivering:
aš is probably cognate of аз, and relates to ا
ge    probably                               relates to Г (г д = бьёт топор)
отец слышишь рубит, а я отВожу (когда всё что у тебя есть, это топор..)
 𒌋(ge₁₄) is not 1, but ten (and also [U (and imun and kiguru)], and in Elamite it's I[u]
 𒌋(ge₁₄) in Sumerian is    
                    [bur, burud] breach, hole; depression, low-lying area, depth; to perforate, to be deep
                    [bur] unit of area and volume "bur"               
                    [giguru] edge, rim
                    [šu, šug] Alternative form of 𒁻 (sug₂ /⁠sug⁠/, “plural of 𒁺 (gub, “to stand”)”)
                    [u]     abuse;    finger;    gift;    totality;    hole, earth
                    [u] ten
                    [umun] Alternative form of 𒅇𒈬𒌦 (u₃-mu-un /⁠umun⁠/, “lord”)
                    10, 600, 36000 [BUR₃, GIGURU, U, UMUN (which number is which I dunno)]

And that 𒁺 for stand is definitely a foot, and thus, as 𒉺 ~ П indicated, have to be read rotated 90° clockwards.
But 𒌋 as depth would make more sense being rotated 90° counter-clockwise, so what is going on here..
Did they write read it as we do, but rotated good things one way, bad things the other way?
In Akkadian
𒁹 [diš/ṭiš] one,    
                used before (mainly) masculine personal names.
                marker for beginning sentences and paragraphs.
                repetition marker.
In Sumerian
𒁹 [diš] one
𒁹 [santak, sag̃tak] mathematical triangle, and wedge in cuneiform, the 𒁹 itself.
𒁹 [diš, I, m, p (don't ask; probably not)] used before (mainly) masculine personal names.
don't confuse it with 𒐕 [g̃eš] sixty
(but I think 𒁹 and 𒐕 are the same sign, the way 𒌋 is ten times 60ⁿ (n ∊ ℕ))


𒀹 [upu]    One half ikû (unit of area).

So, what was that image with "alternative form of ge"? Does that 𒀸[ge] can be any other wedge?
(as if blows can come from any way, maybe by differing from 𒁹 to 𒌋 it had different insensity)
Grok teaches: Can It Be “Any Other Wedge”?    No, Not Really: Cuneiform wedges aren’t interchangeable like Lego bricks. Each shape—horizontal (𒀸), vertical (𒁹), diagonal (𒀹), Winkelhaken (𒌋)—has distinct roles. Scribes didn’t swap them willy-nilly; meaning and sound shift with form.



Suddenly I realized which languages should I study: the extreme languages: since that ubykh only had two vowels, I have to look into it: it compensdated by complex system of consonants: probably, a different way of letterization of syllables. And suddenly I felt as their tradition could be the source of the disgusting arabic vomiting sounds (chechen speech is even more gross, like concentrated arabic. was they always the vanguard part? They are the whitest of them all, so they're boosted by our genes, and the question is should we merge as jews maybe want us to? But then some of them say that they want to substitute us, but intermixing is happening. Is it their way to solve the imbreeding problem? But if you mix a barrel of jam and a barrel of shit, you get two barrels of shit. So, abort? I was speaking of the jewish psy-op, but does it apply to cross-bred kids? Maybe not, half of their blood is white, so some peculiar uniqueness may appear, as we pretty much see here and there; but it shouldn't be motivated. But then there are people who think that it should. Thus I should push the other narrative, it takes two to tango)

isn't narrative ratty word?
what others are in the set? bias
agenda is a better synonym to bias (buy us, and I think I know they're for sale, sluts (sale whats (чёта)))


Г П Т (check cursive forms, they're something like г̅ п̅ т̅̅̅̅̅ (I noticed that feature and could help it))
reflects
  ΒΔ   ϜΓ  ΜΛ  ΠΤ
A     E     I      O    Υ
on some larger level
Λ Ν Μ is on that same level
and it could reflect how lnm~гпт (only ..is it results of the stylization of similar structures missing the point of whether they count them by heads or by legs)

Did ΒΔ   ϜΓ  ΜΛ  ΠΤ be bada bede bidi bodo?
And did back vowels o and u turned the consonants voiceless by disturbing vowels the vocal cords



Is две bilingual word? d as in digamma and diploid, ве as in besexual bisexual and bilingual

two as that bilingua is even more crazy: is t or v the second goes. t is two fingers crossed, v is two fingers on one hand. t is two sticls one on the top of the other. v is fingers.
First we had the numerals (these two noumerals) then we (humans)

    намба ~ абман     (эта бешаная идея в финале этого лежит)
(number)   (обман)


слова слога слуга
word             ward    guard



>graffiti like the stuff at Pompey give us an idea of how words were actually pronounced as spelling mistakes often reflect real pronunciation in contrast to orthographic norms.
Or they were a dialectal forms, if they exist at all, of course, because if you knew the actual examples, you'd bring them up instead of making up silly examples like neeté kloob.
I know of one such example: people always thought that β was [v], and η was [i], until somebody found in a comedy a flock of sheeps saying βη. Well, duh. And what if the comical moment was in those sheeps actually being pigs? What I'm trying to convey here is one good and solid example of actual data is much better than empty academic verbosity the only message of which is "trust the experts".
They also say, that η was [h] in all greek dialects but one. Well, how about indexing such revelations, so I could easily check their way of thought and on what data it was based?
Be ~ vie!!! βη!?!?!?!?
Wiktionary does not yet have an entry for βη.
vieFR ~ lifeEN ~ ζωήGR
vivreFR ~ liveEN ~ ζωGR
vifFR ~ aliveEN ~ ζωντανόςGR
GR
vivanteFR ~ aliveEN ~ ζωντανόςGR

-antFR & a-EN
may tell that that a- is ã but it is not "not", I wonder why. alive is live as imflammable is flammable.



Ф is double G, which is exactly F as double Г.



возвращаясь к грузинскому (избегал его, потому что уж больно мудрёный и буквы на наши не похожи)

ა   ბ   გ   დ
ე   ვ   ზ   თ
ი   კ  ლ  მ   ნ
ო  პ   ჟ   რ  ს  ტ
უ  ფ   ქ   ღ  ყ  შ  ჩ  ც  ძ  წ  ჭ  ხ  ჯ  ჰ

а б г д это просто, почти как у нас
э в з т раскрывает предыдущую версию греческого (ΕϜΖΘ, про Ϝ было известно из изопсефии типа нумерации страниц наверное, а то что ничего подобного Η не было можно было лишь догадываться, когда историки древние рассказывали как две гласные в него добавили жрецы
..но в английском есть H: EFGH.
H before I, double before single (and h can turn into labials (in japanese, thus somewhere else as well))
EFG ~ EFZ is the common part.. wait.. EFG is latin, EVZ is georgian ~ greek (greece and colchis are the nearest neighbours (especially when anatolia was greek))
и к л м н это как у нас без и-краткой
о п ж р с т уникальна, потому что в еврейском там ц стоит и q, в латыни только q, а русском и греческом после п р, что говорит что они ранее были едины: pLA рRU
LA of Los Angeles is Latin (Latin America, as if Rome moved there)
NY of New York is Ynglysh writtne in Yiddish manner. Nemetsko-Yvreysky?
Ж and R make a claster.

And I look at the last line, being twice as long as the previous one. And I challenge what I know..
and no, no vowel to break it in two:
Tsani (asomtavruli Ⴚ, nuskhuri ⴚ, mkhedruli ც, mtavruli Ც)
and some shapes remind ц, but only vaguely. Ⴚ on the other hand is just G, and G of latin turns into Z in greek, which maybe tells, that it is Ž, отвлёкся,
Надо остальные два параллельно изучать, может какой из них проще войдёт.







Russian table showing how mhedruli and mtavuli are two different scripts,
but basically they're the same. And though less obvious, but asomtavruli and nuskhuri are two scripts of a rather different writing system.
Asomtavruli's d is a letter I saw recently in a undecyphered tablet (in the end of the first half of this volume) but it's just a coincidence, for other shapes have nothing in common.


Ⴀ Ⴁ Ⴂ Ⴃ
Ⴄ  Ⴅ Ⴆ Ⴇ
Ⴈ   Ⴉ Ⴊ Ⴋ Ⴌ
Ⴍ Ⴎ Ⴏ Ⴐ Ⴑ Ⴒ
Ⴓ Ⴔ Ⴕ Ⴖ Ⴗ Ⴘ Ⴙ Ⴚ Ⴛ Ⴜ Ⴝ Ⴞ Ⴟ Ⴠ Ⴡ Ⴢ Ⴣ Ⴤ Ⴥ჆Ⴧ჈჉჊჋჌Ⴭ჎჏ (the grey shapes are green or red in the table above, thus the table shows their numeral position, but unicode groups them at the end)

ⴀⴁⴂⴃ
ⴄⴅⴆⴇ
ⴈⴉⴊⴋⴌ
ⴍⴎⴏⴐⴑⴒ
ⴓⴔⴕⴖⴗⴘⴙⴚⴛⴜⴝⴞⴟⴠⴡⴢⴣⴤⴥ⴦ⴧ⴨⴩⴪⴫⴬ⴭ⴮⴯

ⴋⴌ in nuskhuri looks much more like in mhedruli-mtavruli, they are indeed different fonts of the same writing system. Maybe just as in latin A a a are all the same letter.

ა   ბ   გ   დ
ე   ვ   ზ   თ
ი   კ  ლ  მ   ნ
ო  პ   ჟ   რ  ს  ტ
უ  ფ   ქ   ღ  ყ  შ  ჩ  ც  ძ  წ  ჭ  ხ  ჯ  ჰ


Ⴉ [k] ~ ᛃ[j] (georgian and runic)

Ⴃ & დ have some spectacular graphic resemblance being almost nothing like one another.
They two give some concept. is it fruit? но ни фрут ни плод в грузинском с დ не начинаются.
Понимаешь в чём смысл разных шрифтов? Они показывают что-то общее, создавая "трёхмерность" объекта (плоское на бумаге, но в движении вариативности)



(следующее предложение просто пример, из другого текста, этот абзац про ритм предложений)
Это слишком ахуенно, чтобы не рассказывать, но и слишком пиздец чтоб рассказывать.
(русский ритм вообще не английскийй)


понятие дореволюционный период предполагает, что сейчас революционный. И, в-принципе, правильно. Но на самом деле речь про социалистическую революцию (которая прекратилась чтоли? куча психов заряженных по всему миру)


𓈙𓈚𓈛𓈜 the rectangular hieroglyphs all seem to represent teeth (be it just the white rectangular or a rectangula with a shine or their rectangular with the gap between jaws or them drawn almost individually (they're all transliterated as [ʃ] and it made me think of teeth, because ש[ʃ] is tooth)

𓈝 (the teeth on legs) is probably "сходить и договориться" because the list of egyptian hieroglyphs translates it as Go, set out (šm)

(ـد does look like an entrance of a tent)
ещё одна дельта~далет~dal~door:




f would be the better first than h, and because h turns into f in japanese (our languages are related (I speak a lot of it elsewhere) and phonetic level is something rather deep)

Thus we can clarify the first aicme by the aide of the second one.

blnsh or blnhs? or something else? h and s are not too much pair ..unless h[ʃ], then it was blnsh and it places h right next to the f, as ᚅ to ᚆ, and I didn't expect it, it could stand anywhere. Is it a wild chance, which always has chance, or is it as important as L and R at the axial symmetry.

half Ш is ц or ч, and I had revelation of Ш earlier today: it is half Ф

 B D
 F  Г   Ф G   Ф Ш   Ф q   Ф РGR   𐌚 𐌔   𐌚 S   𐌚 σ   г, c, ш [g, s, ʃ] are all variations of the C glyph
Μ Λ
П Т

are prussian and gressian named after the way they call P, grecian~russian (probably divided by the way they pronounce that very Р[r]  :пэй is jewish word for рот,  рот is russian word for рот


Са́тори[1] (яп. 悟り, сатори; кит. 悟, у; санскр. संबोधि, самбодхи, дословно — «просветление») — в медитативной практике дзэн — внутреннее персональное переживание опыта постижения истинной природы через достижение «состояния одной мысли» (санскр. дхьяна или яп. дзэн).

В японской буддийской традиции сатори используется наряду с термином «кэнсё» — яп. 見性, кэнсё:, «ви́дение [собственной] природы». Мастера дзэн[кто?] подчёркивают, что кэнсё не является сатори, но является своеобразным «преддверием» к нему, не следует привязываться к этим переживаниям, подчёркивают они (как, впрочем, и к сатори)

кэн сё ~ can see (but 見 is see, 性 is sex, nature, character, gender, guality, -ity, -ness,

Thinking of how ц and ч are longer than c[k] it made me think of that c as of г, ʟ, 1, |

which makes H ~ ц, H ~ ч, but if H[ʃ] then ц and ч are wrong shapes of с (and c is double г))

an hour or so ago we collected the modern state of double labial / single lingual
now, let's collect the double long / single short set of pairs:

And because it is nowhere as alphabetic as the previous group, I suspect it to appear later:
C as double Г (be it ч, с, ц)
S as double C (for c is k half of the times, s is never)
Ж as double K (makes sense only if K could be voiced, as ᚴ[k] with a dot in it, is ᚵ[g]
Z as double Г
N as double Λ
W as double V
X as double C
Щ as double Ц or Ч (or Ш as double Ч)
Щ as double Ц
Ш as double Ч
Y as double I
u as double i
P[p] as double F
В[v] as double b[b]
is ь b? one is soft, the other is labial (is other the or?)
so ъ d? as b and d of the old roman cursive, different only by the upper stroke:
(4th century)
and a couple of capital letters, the nex one is 4th century too:
and this one is from the 7th:


the one from the 7th century only fit the axial symmetry if the W is taken as two letters.
the one from the 4th century only fits the axial if the Y's after T somehow, or if they're both vowel,
the cursive of the 4th century knows X, and basically cursive are hard to tell,
a e i o u
a i u e o
a o u e i

aue of japanese and irish rings

what is actually the aue? could it be some foreign influence? who were офени? oveni (ove~aue)

oven
over
overt
love: l'oue
Franco-ProvençalEtymology    (Compare the French ouais and oui.)
Interjection
ouè (ORB, broad)    yes
Antonym: nan

ouais From oui via dialectal variants; also possibly from oyez. /wɛ/ [wэй]
Before becoming an informal synonym of oui, the word was exclamatory. According to Auguste Scheler, it could be linked to Indo-European roots: οὐαί (ouaí) in Greek, vae in Latin, uau in Portuguese, wow in English, wau in German, guau in Spanish or vai in Romanian.


T is an insisting typo today. What about it? Does it want to be decyphered too?
is T double Г? is T ᛐ?

fame / ʃame  these two words look as if fame is shame with snake cut down. So he had a struggle, but he's famously overcome.



A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


it begins as etruscan numerals: 𐌠𐌡𐌢𐌣 (and then, though in some distance, 𐌢 and 𐌣 are in that order)
It's as if, and that's not a crazy assumption, alphabet started as numerals and then it went on expanding from that. But why would labials be double shapes of the linguals if it started the other way around?

Like what if this was the original stone and they fabricated other artefacts on the basis of it?
it is too many assumptions, I don't like this line of reasoning because of them. Let's refocus.




A B D
E F Г
I M Л
O П Т
if this stage existed, axial symmetry wasn't there.
Is axial symmetry the reason for other letters to appear?

12 are months, and it explains V-vowel, for there are from 12 to 13 moons per year.
I tried to see modern names in those letters, and A for Янваль and B for Февраль were great, D for March, not so much; E for Epril, F for May, Г for June, I for Iuly were great, M for Fug Agu August not so much, but it would be great for March; Л for september is not good; O for October though is perfect, П for november is shakey, but okay; T is the second best December, but then I have D to put it. let's rearrange those letters around these lines:

A B M
E F Г
I ? ?  (Л Т (and Λ[l] ~ Ʌ[a]  and  T~S is the best I can offer you))
O n D

May is Фей? Very awesome, btw
L'august? last?
сентябрь ~ tentabre? Сень ~ Тень ~ tent oof тень?*

Thuis thing is even more wild than the previous one.
(in the sense that too many assumptions are in it (starting from the set of the letters, well, actually not, that one is legit, it is based into its own actual coincidence, most likely not accidental coincidence.

Я Ф М
А М И
И А С
О Н Д

russian names of months remind alphabetic sequence in that it is start its triads with vowels in 100% of cases, and they're followed with labials in half of cases (and N could slide as ν) and the supposedly lingual part has the most lingual vowel in it, and if it is J, it totally belongs, it also reminds Y; and M is the other exception, M, again. And where it belongs is August, and it is historically substituted for that name, which makes me wonder what it was before that. Секстябрь! Was it renamed because sex and sept are difficult to distinguish? M belongs there, March? June is not July, so no renaming there. S instead of M is something familiar, but let's stop this crazy stuff. It's too wild, well, it is a part of the story, this hypothesis is in the cast, let's see it it brings something, it is where the interest to calendars (which do hold keys to some elements of this theory, so let's cherish it, today it's more to the point than it was the previous time, so it's growing and maybe it is few revelations away from groking it)



furor
Alternative forms:    furore    furour (obsolete)
From Middle English furour, from Middle French fureur, from Old French furor, from Latin furor,
from furō (“I rage, I am out of my mind”).
Homophone: Führer



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Iдиница
2войка
3ри
4етыре
5ять
6есть
7емень
8осемь
9евять

once again twoo many coincidences: Четыре Zeven восемь gевять
1диница тоже среди них, и это несколько очень чётких совпадений.
Я не был открывателем этого, хотя 4 7 8 и 9 вроде замечал сам, но прочёл и про них прежде чем это "совпадение" начал всерьёз воспринимать 6есть Бесть (bestia, beast, бес (весть?))
ש похожа на 6 повёрнутую на 90° обратноб вроде как 6 это Е
6 это Ш Е Ш т
but it takes only 5 sticks. Was 6 45? right after it was 4.
+ is cross (as on a grave, I wonder if before christians it was in use as well: it's a shape of a stick with a tablet attached(added+tied) to it.

attach add-touch? add-to-it?

I just need to find a language in which numerals are alphabetic, halahamic or whichever they are.
Sanskrit is the first candidate since the numerals are considered to be indian.

अआइईउऊऋॠऌॡएऐओऔअंअः कखगघङहचछजझञयशटठडढणरषतथधनलसपफबभमव ०१२३४५६७८९

палочка ~ пальмочка

девица ~ дивиться (дева ~ диво)

chasm ~ schism



I just realized why rhombic dodecahedron is the philosopher's stone: see vol. 12

The human cells of a tissue are of the same size, thus they're aranged tightly as balls, and soft balls lay into rhombic dodecahedrone shape.
I realized it when I saw (in my mind) what honeycomb is, balls of the same size with soft walls, pressed against eachother.


    So that living in such capsule may create all the right forces within the body.

    I knew that this shape is the philosopher's stone by several reasons, some of which are right there in vol.12 when I first mention it, and maybe some day I sort that up into a special volume.

    I think this may be the subject of a new book.

I think I should write short important books instead of long and unimportant ones.

Like real short, like few pages short.

Но мне нужен гост-райтер, я очень странно, даже чудо́во пишу

Антиукраинский движ это заговор московского кружка лингвистов стандартизировать русский язык по их стандаРТУ.

art
о рот (a рот)
оратор (о речель)
ор
р
ⵔ (tifinagh's R in the P spot)
𓂋 рот
по еврейски пей
п ~ r
pLA ~ рRU

прпрпрпрп   пропердел губами
prprprprprp   p r↑p↑r 

ⵔ как о          ⵔ (tifinagh's R in the P spot)
ⵔо ⵔо ⵔо
[ro] [ro] [ro]
Rah!
☉!

𐌏? (old-italic O)
𐰧? (old-turkiс nt)
ⵙ? (tifinagh s (sun! suntse!))
S as standing between Жа ир Ра
жир жар жор! (жир из мяса от жарки вытекает)
жарёха жирёха жорёха


the nex line is there, because the ⵔоs look more southern than in previous version of that rhyme, which seems more european, and I'm probably trippin, but maybe the nations have tendency to lay head on one or the other shoulder. This is statistically testable yet seemingly absurd observation.

ⵔ как о          ⵔ (tifinagh's R in the P spot)
  ⵔо ⵔо ⵔо
[ro] [ro] [ro]
Rah!
☉!

𐌏? (old-italic O)
𐰧? (old-turkiс nt)
ⵙ? (tifinagh s (sun! suntse!))
S as standing between Жа ир Ра
жир жар жор! (жир из мяса от жарки вытекает)
жарёха жирёха жорёха

probably some contrast with the previous ⵔ made them seem tid bolder, darker
prr как рот,
p-r-r как просьба рот закрыть
(пердёж чтоб заглушить базар тупой, пердёж дабы отвлечь остальных от сказанного смешным)
(и глядя на него, того кому сказал заткнуться, мол это он напердел. и когда он скажет "это ты, а не я" сказать "чего пиздишь?" и невозможно будет определить касательно чего это было сказано, а потому публика будет смущена и не будет понимать бросаю я ему вызов касательно сказанного ранее или касательно обвинения в пердеже. Блин, о чём я думаю, о обезьяньем стае.)
придуль придурь из этого пррр?

Зачем я сочинил эту дикую историю? Чтоб показать дословную (до слов) интеракцию.
Oh happy day, March 8, 2025, 20:20
I just woke up and immediately got this present as the first thought:

A pentagram with vowels at one of its points, rolling round it star-like with labials at the other point, velars at the third or something, coronals at the third-fourth, I didn't count well, I count not very well.

I thouth that because they're four in line, the next vowels will be fifth. Silly me. I thouth that I like is going to be italian, and the o-line to be opst, and that would be it, but little did I know.

And such blunders along the way show, that it is not some knboosphere I'm dipping it from, that I buuild this knowledge by trial and error.

But then couldn't that be that I saw it and it is real, only it's not latin: russians have 5 letters in the first line, ugaritic does as well, and so on. So could there be an alphabet of five letters per line? Well, when it appears we remember this hypothesis and try it again.

Thinking of J standing at the M spot (the same time I thought of italian somehow) I thought of
MJ as MariJuana..
is there a term for it starting with J? J of Joy? M of Merry? The letters fit the function of it.



The genius of James Watson is also in his obvious scientific honesty.
But why would he pull his data as first decyphered human? Probably of schizo gene, maybe he was convinced that it's not cool to put it in the first widely known human genome? Did he choose Craig Venter to that role or was he ousted by that guy? Why would I wanna know? To know who's who in this field, well, we never really know. Or sometimes we can guess. We all have our opinions on it.
I wish people allowed their genetic data to be used. And if Jamie didn't pussy out, they would be asked at start if they allow the data to be used in scientific research, or if they don't. So that some of data would be not anonymous, which is good in the sense of further research.

such
sutj
суть


Возвращаясь к разговору о уёбищности кацапской мовы:



Some authors who use the YBP dating format also use "YAP" ("years after present") to denote years after 1950.[12]
I think Y is redundant, BP and AP follow BC and AD (and it reveals that Christ = Domini,
so it's 75AP, I think I'm gonna call my next book Philosopher'Stone76AP
and if I need to publish an update, it's going to be Philosopher'Stone88AP or something

Here, added an interesting piece into cognates:
九  [kyu] nine is like カ[ka] of K, and u
                and semantically 九 could be 十 minus 一 (u for uno? before V was 6, 5, 4, even 2, it was 1?)
and if 九 十 is animation, then 八 id s is in the sequence: 五 六 七 八 九 十
五 reminds 男
五 shouldda share leg with 七 and 九, and can you see it, it seems it's ther, the prominient end of 七 is basically the end of 一, maybe neutralizing the previous curve, that it's neither way, but don't you see the upper stroke at the right end of 一?

亮 is all separated, it's bright, light, [Liàng]


addiction ~ addition  (that's as if something attaches itself to the addict's personality)


> Just kill 'em all.
Should we eat the bodies too?
Here too is like да, вкусовая добавка не являющаяся необходимой.
И это заставляет меня думать что и to ~ да, что и два~да
до — да
на — no (но-но-но (no-no))
but~no, to~yes?
but as bu-to (no-to, unto)
(I have no idea if this si based or baseless, just trippin' catching what I can)


у япошек козы и овцы один вид:
козёл для японцев горный баран: 山羊


две диалектные формы одного слова:
не́фор и ни́фер к гласным вообще довольно вольно относятся. Единственной консист.. согласованностью является то, что первая гласная палатализированней второй.