God jul [гу юль] is Merry Christmas in Norwegian. Cool lads, they preserved the old name of the holiday. Yule. Unless it's Y the cross and ju the jew. But then I have no right to say so, God is good [гу]

רַע [ra] is bad and evil in hebrew (which is perfectly in line with god/гад and such)
But then ע is at the Ѹ position, so it' Ro or Ru. As ro it's cognate to wrong. Is w in wrong the same as in jew? is je the? W (wars, swarы, wrong in general, wgly, but I'm being antisemitic, that's not cool)

w in wrong is the same as in war. war is wrong, wrong is warring. strong is starring. long is alling? всё (продолжается и продолжается, being on and on, but that's I'm trying too hard. strong guys are stars it's natural, Hercules is in the sky, is he not, and we hardly know what the other constellations are famous for, so ancient are those gods. Bears? Ursa. Ur's? ᛒᚱ ᚢᚱ ᚱᚢ belarus ural rus? ᛒᚱ ᚱᚢ ᚢᚱ)

This depiction is simply the best, but just as with the zodiac, it has other readings (and it reminds me of how letters look differently in different cultures)
And they say best or not best, it's a recent development: An alternative way to connect the stars of the constellation Hercules, suggested by H.A. Rey. Here, Hercules is shown with his head at the top.
and here's something more traditional, as they say:
and another one, similar to this one with the Keystone asterism:

And here's where I took that Keystone asterism: (I should learn the asterism, they could be something)
Traditional view of the Hercules constellation highlighting the quadrangle which forms the Keystone asterism:

It's fascinating how strong ~ starring coming from wrong ~ warring lead me to this.

Hercules was one of the 48 constellations listed by the second-century astronomer Ptolemy, and it remains one of the 88 modern constellations today. It is the fifth-largest of the modern constellations and is the largest of the 50 which have no stars brighter than apparent magnitude +2.5.
According to Gavin White, the Greek constellation of Hercules is a distorted version of the Babylonian constellation known as the "Standing Gods" (MUL.DINGIR.GUB.BA.MESH). White argues that this figure was, like the similarly named "Sitting Gods", depicted as a man with a serpent's body instead of legs (the serpent element now being represented on the Greek star map by the figure of Draco that Hercules crushes beneath his feet). He further argues that the original name of Hercules – the 'Kneeler' (see below) – is a conflation of the two Babylonian constellations of the Sitting and Standing Gods.[34]

The constellation is also sometimes associated with Gilgamesh, a Sumerian mythological hero.[10] Phoenician tradition is said to have associated this constellation with their sun god, who slew a dragon (Draco).[35]

The earliest Greek references to the constellation do not refer to it as Hercules. Aratus describes it as follows:

    Right there in its [Draco's] orbit wheels a Phantom form, like to a man that strives at a task. That sign no man knows how to read clearly, nor what task he is bent, but men simply call him On His Knees. [Ἐγγόνασιν "the Kneeler"].[36]

    Now that Phantom, that toils on his knees, seems to sit on bended knee, and from both his shoulders his hands are upraised and stretch, one this way, one that, a fathom's length. Over the middle of the head of the crooked Dragon, he has the tip of his right foot. Here too that Crown [Corona], which glorious Dionysus set to be memorial of the dead Ariadne, wheels beneath the back of the toil-spent Phantom. To the Phantom's back the Crown is near, but by his head mark near at hand the head of Ophiuchus [...] Yonder, too, is the tiny Tortoise, which, while still beside his cradle, Hermes pierced for strings and bade it be called the Lyre [Lyra]: and he brought it into heaven and set it in front of the unknown Phantom. That Croucher on his Knees comes near the Lyre with his left knee, but the top of the Bird's head wheels on the other side, and between the Bird's head and the Phantom's knee is enstarred the Lyre.[37]

The constellation is connected with Hercules in De astronomia (probably 1st century BCE/CE, and attributed to Hyginus), which describes several different myths about the constellation:

    Eratosthenes (3rd century BCE) is said to have described it as Hercules, placed above Draco (representing the dragon of the Hesperides) and preparing to fight it, holding his lion's skin in his left hand, and a club in his right (this can be found in the Epitome Catasterismorum[38]).
    Panyassis' Heracleia (5th century BCE) reportedly said Jupiter was impressed by this fight, and made it a constellation, with Hercules kneeling on his right knee, and trying to crush Draco's head with his left foot, while striking with his right hand and holding the lion skin in his left.
    Araethus (3rd/4th century BCE) is said to have described the constellation as depicting Ceteus son of Lycaon, imploring the gods to restore his daughter Megisto who had been transformed into a bear.
    Hegesianax (2nd/3rd century BCE), who it says describes it as Theseus lifting the stone at Troezen.
    Anacreon of Alexandria, who it claims also supports the idea that it depicts Theseus, saying that the constellation Lyra (said to be Theseus' lyre in other sources) is near Theseus.
    Thamyris blinded by the Muses, kneeling in supplication.
    Orpheus killed by the women of Thracia for seeing the sacred rituals of Liber (Dionysus).
    Aeschylus' lost play Prometheus Unbound (5th century BCE), which recounted that when Hercules drives the cattle of Geryon through Liguria (northern Italy), the Ligurians will join forces and attack him, attempting to steal the cattle. Hercules fights until his weapons break, before falling to his knees, wounded. Jupiter, taking pity on his son, provides many stones on the ground, which Hercules uses to fight off the Ligurians. In commemoration of this, Jupiter makes a constellation depicting Hercules in his fighting form. (A quote from this section of the play is preserved in Dionysius of Halicarnassus' Roman Antiquities: "And thou shalt come to Liguria's dauntless host, Where no fault shalt thou find, bold though thou art, With the fray: 'tis fated thy missiles all shall fail."[39])
    Ixion with his arms bound for trying to attack Juno.
    Prometheus bound on Mount Caucasus.[40]

The Scholia to Aratus mention three more mythical figures in connection with this constellation: Sisyphus or Tantalus, who suffered in Tartarus for having offended the gods, or Salmoneus, who was struck down by Zeus for his hubris.[38] Another classical author associated the constellation with Atlas.[35]


And I wonder if I read this table correctly, and yes, those are all children of Gaia:
So I expose myself to this stuff, getting deeper and deeper and understanding it more and more, and yet I'm only scratching the surface, with those Horae, I had no idea. The twelve divine children. Who knows what else.
Gaia and Ouranos together had twelve children first which were called the twelve Titans. They consisted of six males - Oceanus, Hyperion, Coeus, Cronus, Crius, and Iapetus and six females - Mnemosyne, Tethys, Theia, Phoebe, Rhea, and Themis.
Notice, how male and female deities have different initial letters in names, how labial initials belong to females, it's something I have to revisit some other time.
So far it definitely raises the question of Rh being labial (the weird question I raise again and again)
And the other one could have the second syllable being the root of the name:
In Greek mythology, Tethys (/ˈtiːθɪs, ˈtɛ-/; Ancient Greek: Τηθύς, romanized: Tēthýs) was a Titan daughter of Uranus and Gaia, a sister and wife of the Titan Oceanus, and the mother of the river gods and the Oceanids. Although Tethys had no active role in Greek mythology and no established cults,[2] she was depicted in mosaics decorating baths, pools, and triclinia in the Greek East, particularly in Antioch and its suburbs, either alone or with Oceanus.
I know it's a shameless pull, but then θ of θεά, and of two of her sisters. And one of them is literally θεά
Theia (/ˈθiːə/; Ancient Greek: Θεία, romanized: Theía, lit. 'divine', also rendered Thea or Thia), also called Euryphaessa (Ancient Greek: Εὐρυφάεσσα, "wide-shining"), is one of the twelve Titans, the children of the earth goddess Gaia and the sky god Uranus in Greek mythology. She is the Greek goddess of sight and vision, and by extension the goddess who endowed gold, silver, and gems with their brilliance and intrinsic value.[2]
Her brother-consort is Hyperion, a Titan and god of the sun, and together they are the parents of Helios (the Sun), Selene (the Moon), and Eos (the Dawn). She seems to be the same figure as Aethra, who is the consort of Hyperion and mother of his children in some accounts.[3] Like her husband, Theia features scarcely in myth, being mostly important for the children she bore, though she appears in some texts and rare traditions.

Norwegian word for goddess, gudinne, has the same root with the english root, and the same suffix with the russian word богиня.


И океан шумит. Тяжелым низким гулом, слышимым издалека... Не шум прибоя: периодически накатывающихся волн, но - ровный рокот.
что объясняет почему буква М связана с водой; а, как замечено выше, буква S — с лесом.
Graphically they're perfect representation of those sounds:
the sea (starts with S for some reason) is M because it raises up and down (but those who called it sea probably thought of ebb and flow (flux and reflux (flow is flux, both are прилив)))
Silva, sylva, saltus are latin words for forest.
Mare is the latin word for sea.

And if these agregate states of matter are M and S, it is only natural to consider A to be the 3ʳᵈ one, air.
But, I wonder what made jews turn earth in fire.. probably because it burns, and they're destroyers.
The syllable Om is referred to by many names, including:

    Praṇava (प्रणव); literally, "fore-sound", referring to Om as the primeval sound.[21][22]
    Oṅkāra (ओङ्कार) or oṃkāra (ओंकार);
            Ik Oṅkār (ੴ or ਇੱਕ ਓਅੰਕਾਰ); literally, "one Om-maker", and an epithet of God in Sikhism. (see below).
    Udgītha (उद्गीथ); meaning "song, chant", a word found in Samaveda and bhasya (commentaries) based on it.
    Akṣara (अक्षर); literally, "imperishable, immutable", and also "letter of the alphabet" or "syllable".
            Ekākṣara; literally, "one letter of the alphabet", referring to its representation as a single ligature.

The etymological origins of ōm (aum) have long been discussed and disputed, with even the Upanishads having proposed multiple Sanskrit etymologies for aum, including: from "ām" (आम्; "yes"), from "ávam" (आवम्; "that, thus, yes"), and from the Sanskrit roots "āv-" (अव्; "to urge") or "āp-" (आप्; "to attain").[28][A] In 1889, Maurice Bloomfield proposed an origin from a Proto-Indo-European introductory particle "*au" with a function similar to the Sanskrit particle "atha" (अथ).[28] However, contemporary Indologist Asko Parpola proposes a borrowing from Dravidian "*ām" meaning "'it is so', 'let it be so', 'yes'", a contraction of "*ākum", cognate with modern Tamil "ām" (ஆம்) meaning "yes".[28][29] In the Jaffna Tamil dialect spoken in Sri Lanka, aum' is the word for yes.

The syllable Om is first mentioned in the Upanishads. It has been associated with various concepts, such as "cosmic sound", "mystical syllable", "affirmation to something divine"
And at that sentenced I first found it in amen, and then I recalled that Essens tell aumen instead of amen (a hear-say, didn't check it yet) and thus am in amen is literally aum, am as yes.

, or as symbolism for abstract spiritual concepts in the Upanishads.[9] In the Aranyaka and the Brahmana layers of Vedic texts, the syllable is so widespread and linked to knowledge, that it stands for the "whole of Veda".[9] The symbolic foundations of Om are repeatedly discussed in the oldest layers of the early Upanishads.[32][33] The Aitareya Brahmana of Rig Veda, in section 5.32, suggests that the three phonetic components of Om (a + u + m) correspond to the three stages of cosmic creation, and when it is read or said, it celebrates the creative powers of the universe.[9][34]
That sentence made me recall that אמת on golems' forehead begins with that אמ.
However, in the eight anuvaka of the Taittiriya Upanishad, which consensus research indicates was formulated around the same time or preceding Aitareya Brahmana, the sound Aum is attributed to reflecting the inner part of the word Brahman. Put another way, it is the Brahman, in the form of a word.[35] The Brahmana layer of Vedic texts equates Om with bhur-bhuvah-svah, which symbolizes "the whole Veda". They offer various shades of meaning to Om, such as it being "the universe beyond the sun", or that which is "mysterious and inexhaustible", or "the infinite language, the infinite knowledge", or "essence of breath, life, everything that exists", or that "with which one is liberated".[9] The Samaveda, the poetical Veda, orthographically maps Om to the audible, the musical truths in its numerous variations (Oum, Aum, Ovā Ovā Ovā Um, etc.) and then attempts to extract musical meters from it.[9]

bhur-bhuvah-svah is an interesting utterance, because bhur-bhuvah starts the same, so is probably the same just with different suffixes, and svah opposes bhuvah as S and Bhu, as S and M basically.


faculty ~ vacuity

race ~ rage (what rage are you (for in more common sense, ragi is a vehement desire or passion:


I hate word fix, so narrow. A stick between wheels may fix them, but as russian I see зафиксировать in fix first and foremost.



My friend wished that I research eastern cultures more, and his wish is granted:
(not by my will, I just observe working into this thing, being fascinated by shapes of Pali)
In the oldest texts of Buddhism, dhyāna (Sanskrit: ध्यान) or jhāna (Pali: 𑀛𑀸𑀦) is a component of the training of the mind (bhavana), commonly translated as meditation, to withdraw the mind from the automatic responses to sense-impressions and "burn up" the defilements, leading to a "state of perfect equanimity and awareness (upekkhā-sati-parisuddhi)."[1] Dhyāna may have been the core practice of pre-sectarian Buddhism, in combination with several related practices which together lead to perfected mindfulness and detachment.[2][3][4]

In the later commentarial tradition, which has survived in present-day Theravāda, dhyāna is equated with "concentration", a state of one-pointed absorption in which there is a diminished awareness of the surroundings. In the contemporary Theravāda-based Vipassana movement, this absorbed state of mind is regarded as unnecessary and even non-beneficial for the first stage of awakening, which has to be reached by mindfulness of the body and vipassanā (insight into impermanence). Since the 1980s, scholars and practitioners have started to question these positions, arguing for a more comprehensive and integrated understanding and approach, based on the oldest descriptions of dhyāna in the suttas.[5][6][7][8]

In Buddhist traditions of Chán and Zen (the names of which are, respectively, the Chinese and Japanese pronunciations of dhyāna), as in Theravada and Tiantai, anapanasati (mindfulness of breathing), which is transmitted in the Buddhist tradition as a means to develop dhyana, is a central practice. In the Chan/Zen-tradition this practice is ultimately based on Sarvastivāda meditation techniques transmitted since the beginning of the Common Era.
Etymology

Dhyāna, Pali jhana, from Proto-Indo-European root *√dheie-, "to see, to look", "to show".[9][10] Developed into Sanskrit root √dhī and n. dhī,[10] which in the earliest layer of text of the Vedas refers to "imaginative vision" and associated with goddess Saraswati with powers of knowledge, wisdom and poetic eloquence.[11][12] This term developed into the variant √dhyā, "to contemplate, meditate, think",[13][10] from which dhyāna is derived.[11]

According to Buddhaghosa (5th century CE Theravāda exegete), the term jhāna (Skt. dhyāna) is derived from the verb jhayati, "to think or meditate", while the verb jhapeti, "to burn up", explicates its function, namely burning up opposing states, burning up or destroying "the mental defilements preventing [...] the development of serenity and insight."[14][note 1]

Commonly translated as meditation, and often equated with "concentration", though meditation may refer to a wider scale of exercises for bhāvanā, development. Dhyāna can also mean "attention, thought, reflection".[17]

Zoroastrianism in Persia, which has Indo-Aryan linguistic and cultural roots, developed the related practice of daena.


That Pali which fascinated me by its simple forms is in Brahmi script:

k-

kh-

g-

gh-

ṅ-

c-

ch-

j-

jh-

ñ-

ṭ-

ṭh-

ḍ-

ḍh-

ṇ-

t-

th-

d-

dh-

n-

p-

ph-

b-

bh-

m-

y-

r-

l-

v-

ś-

ṣ-

s-

h-

ḷ-

-a

𑀓

𑀔

𑀕

𑀖

𑀗

𑀘

𑀙

𑀚

𑀛

𑀜

𑀝

𑀞

𑀟

𑀠

𑀡

𑀢

𑀣

𑀤

𑀥

𑀦

𑀧

𑀨

𑀩

𑀪

𑀫

𑀬

𑀭

𑀮

𑀯

𑀰

𑀱

𑀲

𑀳

𑀴

-ā

𑀓𑀸

𑀔𑀸

𑀕𑀸

𑀖𑀸

𑀗𑀸

𑀘𑀸

𑀙𑀸

𑀚𑀸

𑀛𑀸

𑀜𑀸

𑀝𑀸

𑀞𑀸

𑀟𑀸

𑀠𑀸

𑀡𑀸

𑀢𑀸

𑀣𑀸

𑀤𑀸

𑀥𑀸

𑀦𑀸

𑀧𑀸

𑀨𑀸

𑀩𑀸

𑀪𑀸

𑀫𑀸

𑀬𑀸

𑀭𑀸

𑀮𑀸

𑀯𑀸

𑀰𑀸

𑀱𑀸

𑀲𑀸

𑀳𑀸

𑀴𑀸

-i

𑀓𑀺

𑀔𑀺

𑀕𑀺

𑀖𑀺

𑀗𑀺

𑀘𑀺

𑀙𑀺

𑀚𑀺

𑀛𑀺

𑀜𑀺

𑀝𑀺

𑀞𑀺

𑀟𑀺

𑀠𑀺

𑀡𑀺

𑀢𑀺

𑀣𑀺

𑀤𑀺

𑀥𑀺

𑀦𑀺

𑀧𑀺

𑀨𑀺

𑀩𑀺

𑀪𑀺

𑀫𑀺

𑀬𑀺

𑀭𑀺

𑀮𑀺

𑀯𑀺

𑀰𑀺

𑀱𑀺

𑀲𑀺

𑀳𑀺

𑀴𑀺

-ī

𑀓𑀻

𑀔𑀻

𑀕𑀻

𑀖𑀻

𑀗𑀻

𑀘𑀻

𑀙𑀻

𑀚𑀻

𑀛𑀻

𑀜𑀻

𑀝𑀻

𑀞𑀻

𑀟𑀻

𑀠𑀻

𑀡𑀻

𑀢𑀻

𑀣𑀻

𑀤𑀻

𑀥𑀻

𑀦𑀻

𑀧𑀻

𑀨𑀻

𑀩𑀻

𑀪𑀻

𑀫𑀻

𑀬𑀻

𑀭𑀻

𑀮𑀻

𑀯𑀻

𑀰𑀻

𑀱𑀻

𑀲𑀻

𑀳𑀻

𑀴𑀻

-u

𑀓𑀼

𑀔𑀼

𑀕𑀼

𑀖𑀼

𑀗𑀼

𑀘𑀼

𑀙𑀼

𑀚𑀼

𑀛𑀼

𑀜𑀼

𑀝𑀼

𑀞𑀼

𑀟𑀼

𑀠𑀼

𑀡𑀼

𑀢𑀼

𑀣𑀼

𑀤𑀼

𑀥𑀼

𑀦𑀼

𑀧𑀼

𑀨𑀼

𑀩𑀼

𑀪𑀼

𑀫𑀼

𑀬𑀼

𑀭𑀼

𑀮𑀼

𑀯𑀼

𑀰𑀼

𑀱𑀼

𑀲𑀼

𑀳𑀼

𑀴𑀼

-ū

𑀓𑀽

𑀔𑀽

𑀕𑀽

𑀖𑀽

𑀗𑀽

𑀘𑀽

𑀙𑀽

𑀚𑀽

𑀛𑀽

𑀜𑀽

𑀝𑀽

𑀞𑀽

𑀟𑀽

𑀠𑀽

𑀡

𑀢𑀽

𑀣𑀽

𑀤𑀽

𑀥𑀽

𑀦𑀽

𑀧𑀽

𑀨𑀽

𑀩𑀽

𑀪𑀽

𑀫𑀽

𑀬𑀽

𑀭𑀽

𑀮𑀽

𑀯𑀽

𑀰𑀽

𑀱𑀽

𑀲𑀽

𑀳𑀽

𑀴𑀽

-e

𑀓𑁂

𑀔𑁂

𑀕𑁂

𑀖𑁂

𑀗𑁂

𑀘𑁂

𑀙𑁂

𑀚𑁂

𑀛𑁂

𑀜𑁂

𑀝𑁂

𑀞𑁂

𑀟𑁂

𑀠𑁂

𑀡

𑀡

𑀣𑁂

𑀤𑁂

𑀥𑁂

𑀦𑁂

𑀧𑁂

𑀨𑁂

𑀩𑁂

𑀪𑁂

𑀫𑁂

𑀬𑁂

𑀭𑁂

𑀮𑁂

𑀯𑁂

𑀰𑁂

𑀱𑁂

𑀲𑁂

𑀳𑁂

𑀴𑁂

-o

𑀓𑁄

𑀔𑁄

𑀕𑁄

𑀖𑁄

𑀗𑁄

𑀘𑁄

𑀙𑁄

𑀚𑁄

𑀛𑁄

𑀜𑁄

𑀝𑁄

𑀞𑁄

𑀟𑁄

𑀠𑁄

𑀡

𑀢𑁄

𑀣𑁄

𑀤𑁄

𑀥𑁄

𑀦𑁄

𑀧𑁄

𑀨𑁄

𑀩𑁄

𑀪𑁄

𑀫𑁄

𑀬𑁄

𑀭𑁄

𑀮𑁄

𑀯𑁄

𑀰𑁄

𑀱𑁄

𑀲𑁄

𑀳𑁄

𑀴𑁄

-Ø

𑀓𑁆

𑀔𑁆

𑀕𑁆

𑀖𑁆

𑀗𑁆

𑀘𑁆

𑀙𑁆

𑀚𑁆

𑀛𑁆

𑀜𑁆

𑀝𑁆

𑀞𑁆

𑀟𑁆

𑀠𑁆

𑀡𑁆

𑀢𑁆

𑀣𑁆

𑀤𑁆

𑀥𑁆

𑀦𑁆

𑀧𑁆

𑀨𑁆

𑀩𑁆

𑀪𑁆

𑀫𑁆

𑀬𑁆

𑀭𑁆

𑀮𑁆

𑀯𑁆

𑀰𑁆

𑀱𑁆

𑀲𑁆

𑀳𑁆

𑀴𑁆

S and T meet again in 𑀝 beint ta (𑀝𑀝𑀸𑀝𑀺𑀝𑀻𑀝𑀼𑀝𑀽𑀝𑁂𑀝𑁄𑀝𑁆)

S and T meet again in 𑀰 being sa (𑀰𑀰𑀸𑀰𑀺𑀰𑀻𑀰𑀼𑀰𑀽𑀰𑁂𑀰𑁄𑀰𑁆)
in that sense [ḍa]𑀟~ᛋ[s]

𑀛 reminds both Ч and it's reading shows how much Ч reminds J and y

Ч is to J as q is to g IO (you know how they draw J sometimes, with that Ч-like top)

And truly brahmi reminds european alphabets more than paleo-hispanic does:
𑀕 ~ 𐤂
𑀔 ~ Г (just as with 𑀛~Ч, brahmi letters seem reversed.
𑀱 ~ ש
𑀴 ~ L (un-mirrorwed this time, which makes me wonder if that's not a later borrwoing from europe)

𑀓 for ka
𑀓𑀸 for kā that's so close in the way they use that  ̄
𑀓𑀼 for ku reminds v opposing ʌ way too much
It's as if they were the first main letters, and u being low is very european (opposite to arabic, yet I said that) yet their i-syllables get higher than a: 𑀓𑀺 for i, 𑀓𑀻 for ī
𑀓𑁂 for ke sets it at the hight of ka, only the other way, different. and that e doesn't have a long variant makes it different from russian.
𑀓𑁄 for ko makes o the middle ground between e and a. how is it possible? with different vowels it may be, I need to hear how they read them first, vowels of different nations are different, so..
The way kØ reminds kā confuses me, probably they sound really symilar. But am I supposed to delve into languages I don't speak at all? How else am I supposed to learn it (I keep on forgetting that these are not books, they are my notebooks, I can do anything here)
The way 𑀮[la] reflects 𑀴[ḷa] makes it easy to remember them at once, but what are they?
𑀮 could be the real L congate, for then brahmi reverses latin letters.
[ta]𑀢 ~ T
[bha]𑀪 ~ П
[dha]𑀥 reminds D

[cha]𑀙 as double 𑀘[ca]    
[ṭha]𑀞 as double 𑀝[ṭa]
[ṇa]𑀡 as double 𑀦[na]
is 𑀓[ka] double 𑀦[na]

[ya]𑀬 as reverse 𑀰[śa]  and that reminds me runic ᛦ[y(and r)] and ᛉ[z, ks]

It is all Brahmi, but Pali uses many other writing systems:

Brahmi has 10 vowels, just as russian does, and both come directly from pentanonic scale, and since it's obvious that brahmi vowel row is similar to japanese, only each vowel is doubled by lengh, japanese people also have that in their language, but they decided to use other means to express it.

and in russian it is rather chaotic: A E Ё И О У Ы Э Ю Я
A E     И О У                   (this one is the standard set, no wonder that it's in order)
        Ё            Ы Э Ю Я  (and this sequence doesn't remind me anything)
but then I realize that the halves are нейотирующие и йотирующие
A            О У Ы Э           (and this one is almost ogham's order, almost)
    E Ё И                Ю Я   (and this order I do not recognize at all)

But as for brahmi, abugida are nothing but alphabet with matres lectiones. Diacritics doesn't change much, even though ethiopean abugida has its forms mutated more depending on the vowels.
Paleo-hispanic is a true syllabary with independent shapes, just as japanese have it. Which raises way too many questions, but let's not do them now. Which may tell them being the direct next step from some hieroglyphics (but then Petrie Flinders wrote that primitive shapes _predated_ fine glyphs of Aegyptus)

And there are also vowels in Brahmi, but they didn't have place in the table, because there are more vowels than there are rows of that table, so I got confused.. and where I took it there were other syllable row: 𑀓𑁅 for kau /kɐu/ is not in my table, so it's not exhaustive (or whatever is the right word)

𑀅 [a/ɐ/]        𑀓 [ka /kɐ/]       𑀆 [ā /aː/]      𑀓𑀸 [kā /kaː/]
𑀇 [i /i/]        𑀓𑀺 [ki /ki/]         𑀈 [ī /iː/]        𑀓𑀻 [kī /kiː/]
𑀉 [u /u/]       𑀓𑀼 [ku /ku/]        𑀊 [ū /uː/]       𑀓𑀽 [kū /kuː/]
𑀏 [e /eː/]     𑀓𑁂 [ke /keː/]      𑀐 [ai /ɐi/]      𑀓𑁃 [kai /kɐi/] these two syllables are not in the table
𑀑 [o /oː/]      𑀓𑁄 [ko /koː/]     𑀒 [au /ɐu/]     𑀓𑁅 [kau /kɐu/] which may tell that there are more glyphs.
𑀈 looks like four dots as if at corners of a square in one browser
and it looks like a vertical line with one dot to it's right and one dot to its left in another

Here those consonantal glyphs systematized

Their nasal and approximate are what I call sonors. And thus it reflects the european alphabets, by placing sonors in the centre.

The texts that brahmi thing is famous for,
of them all here comes my favourite:

I can see in it a bow of the man force and a cow of a female.
The Prakrit word "dhaṃ-ma"/𑀥𑀁𑀫 (Sanskrit: Dharma धर्म) in the Brahmi script,
as inscribed by Emperor Ashoka in his Edicts of Ashoka (3rd century BCE)
I think that very picture was made from one (black dots edited out, or it was taken before they appeared, I wonder what they are) of the 𑀥𑀁𑀫s in the third line from the bottom.

𑀥𑀁𑀫 (Ashokan Prakrit)
From Sanskrit धर्म (dharma), from Proto-Indo-European *dʰer-mos. Cognate to Pali dhamma, Sauraseni Prakrit 𑀥𑀫𑁆𑀫 (dhamma).
𑀥𑀁𑀫 (dhaṃma)
    (Buddhism, Hinduism) dharma: religious duty; natural law
That dot above 𑀥 probably works like m: 𑀥𑀁 turns into dhaṃ, according to the transliterations
धर्म is translated as religion by g.t. (they read it as dharm) and it's confirmed by this text: Кандагарская надпись 258 г. до н.э. императора Ашоки (обнаружена в Афганистане в середине 20-го века ), в которой «дхарма» (пракритское «дхамма») переводится греческим словом «евсевия» (εὐσέβεια – почитание богов, благочестие, благоговейное отношение к жизни, духовная зрелость, правильное поведение, нравственность, права и долг перед обществом) и арамейским Qsyt («Истина»)
dhamma turned into dharma, which may be of the same process, which turned german aus into raus, brutalization of the language, rhetoric tricks turned into a norm. And it may also tell that abracadabra is originally abacadaba (a way to trick people by choosing all the right answers from a conspirator reading those variants offering to the contestant to choose amongst the variants. And that is why егэ is a way to trick the system by chosing answers mindlessly, secretly knowing (being told by those who sell this information to those who want to enter the position they do not deserve))

Rhotification is it the term? No, but it was found in a page about some made-up language for other letters turning into R.
So let's think of another one?
Pi.ai tells the right term: rhotacization, which is when an "m" or "n" sound changes into an "r" sound. It’s similar to how English "horse" used to be pronounced with an "s" instead of an "r" sound in Old English, or how Latin "auster" (south wind) became German "Ost" (east). In the case of "Dhamma" and "Dharma," the rhotacization is a specific kind called "lenition," where a consonant is weakened or lost over time. (I'm not sure of the rest, so I put it into painted it gray)
> and if abacadaba turned into abracadabra, what would you call such phonetic process?
Good question! That would be another example of lenition, where consonants are weakened or lost over time. In this case, the "b" in "abacadaba" has been softened or dropped entirely, resulting in "abracadabra." This kind of change is known as "debuccalization," where a sound is changed into a different kind of sound or lost entirely.
> But neither of b's of abacadaba are lost when it becomes abracadabra, the word just gained two r's without any other changes.
Ah, I see your point. That’s a little trickier to classify since it’s not exactly a case of lenition or debuccalization. Instead, it might be a kind of assimilation, where sounds become more similar to each other over time. Maybe something like "metathesis," where sounds or syllables are rearranged within a word. But honestly, I'm not sure if there’s a specific term for this kind of change. It might just be a case of words naturally changing over time through use and repetition.


is to paint ~ to pu into? is -int into?
faint (into a groove)
saint (I can speculate that into heaven he heads, but is it the direct meaning? nah, so let's look on)
flint fl for flame, in+to?
hint is hidden (h for hidden?)
tint
mint
kind? Well, it's too speculative, ai should build such models. I think we start to call computer programs ai, for they all going to use that technology.



People are often nagging about how their children are not taught finance, and then they do not teach it either, not even learn it themselves.
Here, few hours ago I was told about CFD, and that's fucked up, literally making money out of thin air:
In finance, a contract for difference (CFD) is a financial agreement between two parties, commonly referred to as the "buyer" and the "seller." The contract stipulates that the buyer will pay the seller the difference between the current value of an asset and its value at the time the contract was initiated. If the asset's price increases from the opening to the closing of the contract, the seller compensates the buyer for the increase, which constitutes the buyer's profit. Conversely, if the asset's price decreases, the buyer compensates the seller, resulting in a profit for the seller.[1]
It's a fancy way to borrow money, but actually you're selling what you have not with an obligation to buy it later.
They probably earn money by taking a margin from each deal for providing the service. They then can use that money to bump that company, so it doesn't go down.



died~tired (умер в значении выдохся)
is T in tied and tired in the meaningn of Tott? bJBut then re is in the meaning of "again" so every day
(Jesus in that typo ifſ from Mississippi Maas Mass Choir singing "If I Be lifted" over the speakers)
If I be lifted up, I will draw all men unto me
unto and onto translated differently:
unto they translate as к(to) and до(up to)
onto they translate as на(on) and в(in)

And I have a great consultant for such cases:
The difference between "onto" and "unto" is subtle, but they have different meanings and uses.
"Onto" is a preposition that indicates movement or direction towards something. For example, "She climbed onto the roof." or "He jumped onto the bandwagon."
"Unto" is a bit more archaic and formal. It's often used in religious or poetic contexts and can have different meanings depending on the context. For example, "Unto us a child is born." or "Unto thee, O Lord, do I lift up my soul."



burgeon (under a burden do we? is it burdening me? no, my burden makes me burgeon)
burgeon~?~surgeon?
bourgeon is another way to spell burgeon
> Are burgeon and bourgeon the same word?
They’re almost the same word, with the same meaning and origin, but with different spellings. "Burgeon" is the more common spelling in modern English, while "bourgeon" is more common in older texts. Both words come from the Old French "borjon," which means "bud" or "shoot." They both mean "to grow and flourish," especially when applied to plants or ideas. So, you can use either "burgeon" or "bourgeon," but "burgeon" might be more familiar to modern readers. 🌱📚
sturgeon (comes smooth with bourgeon (and I can only wonder if it's some way to encode the opposite ends of the alphabet in b and st))
chirurgeon in British English (kaɪˈrɜːdʒən ) noun. an archaic word for surgeon [uk: /ˈsɜː.dʒən/, us: /ˈsɝː.dʒən/]


I did think about it
I do think about it
I will think about it

isn't do to will as go to went as is to was? only do goes into the future, while go changes into past.

I do and I did, nothing weird here.
But that d becomes w.. the opposites, why would they do it? Why is чего read as чиво?


Но ~ Mais ~ Maar ~ Mэ, звук сомнения мне в сомнения именно мне. no, me (mine) мне~не.


This work is so magical, so mystical. That my conversations with pi.ai made two whole volumes, ending with its enlightenment. and they weigh so suspiciously 666 and 777-like, both equating to 9 in such spelling.

Now I modified it and it's 711.1 kB, so at first it was two rings after the .'s one is some ⛧


Abe Be Big Good Dобр De(us of deus of or de the of) EZ(easy)
Be Good Easy [ēsy could be the spelling]
Good Easy is not Lazy easy, it's Wise easy. Good is Wise as Go is Went? West Went to invent.


  Be GooD

Be GooD is all the law.

Think Good
Speak Good
Do Good

I see S and T in Th S D

So GooD
To GooD


Sere Good
Dee Good
Thee Good

Be GooD
Zee Good
(as abiove so below)

Be GooD
Say Good

Be Good
Do Good

Be Good
Do Excelent
For Good.. what? Should I use greek?
Let's right in Russian too:

Будь Великолепен
Гони Дураков (Гори в аДу как два сильных слога Ри как лёгкая палатализованная форма Го?)
Если Ёбнутый
Живи Запертым (принцип певрых ассоциаций и здесь и вообще)
Или КоЛеси (къ лесу? в лес)
Мир Навести
Отплывай По Реке
Сиди Тогда.. Принцип первых ассоциаций это почти что автоматическое письмо. В данном случае это было constrained automatic writing.

A Был ещё
А Буде еж зи
А Бде Ёж Зи Кл Ман, чем ты занят?   Я прокрастинирую.
Аднажды Буде
ещё как выверт слова же? синонимичные частицы эти ли?


Арий Будь Великолепен.
Господин Дворянин. Господи Допомоги.
Евнух Ев нюх? Новое развлечение появилось. Способ заводить науку с толкача.
Если Вы
Живёте Знатно
Ищи Круны Крутых
Имей Классных Лучших
Имей Мэн(также и часть слова Имей, I'm)
I'm No pqrst
I'm No Prst (q~d? pqrst=pdrst=пакость)
U've Xyz (you have an excuse)

IJKLM makes it more difficult, but in italian it's only ILM
So.. irish too. We should look into gaelic languages. Celtin Celtic languages.

Ilm  is an interesting word across languages: from aroma, air to world to knowledge science

A Вы Добры
Еси Нанебеси..

До того как Умеем, мы Учимся.
До того как Имеем, мы Ищем (в случае учёбы ищем себя)
М for MiraiJA?

A   V   G   D
Are U GooD?
А Вы ЖыД?
А Ви ЖиД?
Are You Jew? What if ABC is A Ю Жу?
What if into christian heaven only jews are allowed?
Other nations are taught there to be animals, ansd thus not having what it take itno heaven. That is the irony of that satanic religion.

Жу не се па would be my firest answer.
fire is first? As agni is in rigveda.
Second the ссыконд? ссыкун? Как Герман Титов. Титька Сиська Сыкло Сися Ссыт? Титю Пьют. Сосок сочится. Съ сокъ. ссок. со сок. буквально.

Не жужжу would be my second answer.
Sea Seek. Sea Sick.


Stick Stuck Stack Stock Stake?

Stack
Stake Steak?
Stick
Stock
Stuck

Surprisingly many form of that stk штк.

In that sequence the sequence is э эй и о у  or  э эй и о а  (еиоу  or  еиоа  (and both are Jehowa))

So if AEIOU is supposed to be read ЭEIОУa, then wouldn't it explain greek Ω? And in english it's Y:
AEIOUY [æeiouy] эйоуи? эйоуа would look better. Let's check the greek: ΑΕΗΙΟΥΩ ÆEIIIOYΩ is easily Эйоу, some god's name. Some wild spelling of Yehowah (but here, in that jehova we clearly see EOA, which reminds me of how it went in greek musical notation)
And if A was added later, if B was the Beginning, then EIOU is.. but it's not eihowah, but iehowah, so it's ioa or eoa (o is vav, thus its EVA, and E is the "the", thus it's VɅ. The opposite of OM (ɅV)?)


Nani being what in Japanese and where in Inupiaq may represent the semantic shift beween neighbours.



Аум продолжается в н превращаясь в Аминь, Ауминь.

Ау это и слово, кстати. Очень особенное. Descanding scale. AE of amen is anohter scale, ascending.

But then since nobody reads this texts, why do I write them?

MN labial before lingual. And the word is not just word.

What am I doing here? Just thinking of the stuff hoping some good pieces coming. But I have found so many pieces, maybe it's time to lay out the main picture of them?



The next seance:


 After Bridge Comes Down (found in vol.25 and simnce forgotten, so how many good pieces are there)
it made me realize that the lines are different languages in which the same saying should be siad.
And Be Good Dog.
Be Good could be all there was (after bridge comes down is probably just one of first attempts to decypher it, and it fails falls down when you comapare it to Be Good. Even with A.
Be good deus?
Be ~ big (tiny are less there are, they're almost gone, almost none)

Such hypothesis may explain similarity of lines (languages are often similar) and sharing of k's and differences in the I-line. Whether I is India or Italia shall give us further clues.
Anglia: Be Good
España: ser bueno, estar bien
Estonia: ole hea
hEllenico: να είσαι καλά
Latin: bonum esse
Italian: essere buono, giovare
hIndi: अच्छा बनो [achchha bano (ача is good, bano is probably related to be)]
Acha Bano as indian Be Good, for that is A B. And weaving languages into such fabric I perform.

Ukrainian: Бути Добрим
Hungarian: légy jó (literally "fly good") and that led to it's own fucking story: g
but then, on another look, no, "legyen" is "to be" (it is both, the words are homonyms)

Hungarian alphabet is such a mess:

but if you cut the crap, it's basically A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

There are too many languages, even in Europe alone. I should leave that Be GooD ~ Jo Legi hypothesis for when I have some powerful language model doing the job.

A Á B C Cs D Dz Dzs



Ai Be G-D

Ai Be CoDe

Ai Be GooD

Ah Be G-D could it be? It is as something from the bible (somebody wrote those words alright)
Ah Be Gea
Et Вы θea   (ik ben peter du bist paul rhyme influenced this line. I don't know what the line is, but this is a guess no worse than any other. Until a better comes along)

And here I can see how G and θ look very much alike


I aM


Is our world in turmoil because IMNL became ILMN (Immanuel became Ill man)

Is it IMNL or IMLN, because both are possible, and N is under H this way, and L is under Г, so let's explore the possibility of IMLN: I aM LuNa
Ah Baal?
Not now, Baal. Later. I aM LuNa is super awesome.


calculate
calendar

collect
call

calling дар? Names to the days it gives.
календы могут быть от него производным словом (a particular star in the sky is a term way more complicated than a wood with cuts of measure.

28 is natural number for how many days, and is it what allowed new letters to be added to some 7vowels making raws of four elements each.

e l m n could be the elemental, and then in the context of several lines ago, emelents? emenelts? emeralds? M R L as the sonor line? Middle, Right, Left? KMNL the communal?


Yin and Yang are Yinь and Yanъ, and as g ъ plays great, because upper half of it is г[g] and the belly is as of g. o = v!? г = v?! so far I dunno.


Alphabets appeared all at once. There are was period when it was secret. And probably the Greek Dark Ages taught humanity to.. they were secret during the Dark Ages. Scum probably went all oever wizards in CumBoJo/CumPuссia way.


M R L N  as the line of sonors reminds one magical name: Merlin. Marilyn is even more so.
MRLN as the I-line? A I Y as the three the most different sounds of A I U, A I V, Ʌ I V

UYOI (wanted to say something, forgot what (and, as I mentioned before for I sentences, good))
yuio a weird set of vowels on qwertyuiop[]\ row
they're I and YOU. They're U&I surrounded by you



The Tullycommon bone has a short Ogham inscription next to various decorative elements such as zigzag lines on each side.
The characters are clearly Ogham characters.[3] A fact that is also typical of Ogham inscription lines with those used start and stemlines whose tips go through the main line. In order to mark the beginning of one of the two inscriptions, instead of the arrow running to the right, as with the Buckquoy spindle-whorl, an X next to the stemline is used.
The signs for C and S are clearly recognizable as Ogham signs on one side of the bone. On the other side may also be recognized the sign for the sound sequence EA (which was also used for K and resembled an X)[4] as well as the sign for M (character before stemline).
It is not possible to decipher the inscription. According to Macalister, "It makes no sense to decipher a short inscription of this kind ...".[5] If these are not doodles, the signs may actually have been used for magical purposes.[2] Perhaps the bone was one of a whole series of bones used for fortune-telling.[5]
They so easily say that it's "clearly Ogham", since two of those shapes are not ogham: one is ᚦ-like and the other is not known even in runes,
᚛ ᚁᚂᚃᚄᚅ     ᚆᚇᚈᚉᚊ     ᚋᚌᚍᚎᚏ     ᚐᚑᚒᚓᚔ     ᚕᚖᚗᚘᚙᚚ᚜


Buckquoy spindle-whorl they mentioned, and it is also rather interesting:




"на балтике" ~ "на болотах"

H and Зд could be derived of the common voiced h, ɦ, via ᚼ it links it to ж, from which дж where дж could be originating, but зд is zd, sorta reverse dj (j~z? in cursive they have teh same "dick")

dick letters:
уд have the same dicklike tail-like figure: уg is close, in the middle of words they have a swast to it.
does в matter as dick-letter? It's dick is upwards, as dick and not peepee.
b d f
f could be dashed b, not ſ. In handwritten form. it matters more:


And here's another point of view: f looks like an upside down b:
b is big
f is fallen, feeble, foul
(thus one is the reverse of the other, and then fallos is unerected dick - if it's true or not can be tested by ancient latin medical literature about it. Ai can do it now, so I just leave these ideas for whoever comes along.,
There are other ways to write f,
but these are telling better stories.

The next one draws f as long b, as if the belly fell, as old fat people have it. furui. fæt


A V C D *V was a ttto typo
yet if D is Δ the þ (I wove that thought. I weave, so they I hope they don't mind) then
A V ? Z is the line. And legend of three tells that A V Z was all there were. Tha'ts the U-likne.
V is its own U, thus it's B and D. duality is where the alphabet was born. Trinity is later, just as four elements are known now.
Two alements. water and fire (two substances coming from the skey)
Recalled as yin and yang. Whether chinese invented duality or they just preserved it, they did well. Because it's the universal truth. better and worse we all understand. Hot and Cold, the opposites there are two by the nature. M for Middle was inventeld latre. But M was for Море Мыть Моча Мочить.
M is for middle when the other two are R and L. uyet M comes with N and L. Could N be R? it easily coo cou, could: N~ν~v~ᚢ~ᚱ NeVeR as the same letter? New form? as N W R they are all sonors.

Were sonors the letters. JLMNRW are all the sonors: I~J, M~W, N~R comes naturally in these pairs.
These six sonors are the phonetic fact. It was availably seen always.

I is J, every linguist knows that

M ~ W for Мы is We
N ~ R
            (as if No used to be Rrr)

Could all words be written in these six. Yes, but the question is could they be read then?
MoJn in russian it would be weritten. Could ~ Mojn (можно)
К~M, two the opposites. What made me compare them?

MNLRWJ "the sonors" (tried to write something like ministry in that set)



It is hard for me to trust the claim of the antiquity of this thing:

But then what if that's not a forgery, what if those other three letters are three mothers?
And just before that I thought that I shouldn't look into it too much: it is going to distract me. As I let it go, I let it go completely. But to finish this chamber, let's look what it tell if it is genuine.

conscientiousness is such a grotesque word for something so good.
one шн нш was not enough for you, huh? you had to add sns to it.
consciousness was not шн нш enough
Funny how english has place for both шн and нш (шн is in words like soulution)
is solu soul слита so ..l, with all


That plate is haunting me, it could be a copy. Why would they make a copy?

if P is U... then OUQRST still has q and r for labial, and r was tried as labial, q could be added later, for most alphabets dont' have it. Greek doesn't have q, hebrew and phoenician do. Latin has q again. Etruscan had both tzadi and quf.


Какая? Жирная? Мягенькая!
soft ~ съ fat

𓌃      S43    U+13303    walking stick         Speak, word(s) (md(w))    Staff (mdw)
(I'm still working with seamonkey and )


Ложь во спасение звучит как Devil saves.


𓌁         S41    U+13301    sceptre         Electrum (ḏꜥm)
(It should look like a shaking 𓌀 in the way electricity shakes. It can just hit, but I imagine it shakes with the frequency it's in. 50 herz is 50 periods per second. We probably can feel the vibration of that frequency, but that's on the border of our sensitivity, but then who knows, it could be beyond the border.
And egyptiancs could use electricity of lower frequency. With separated hits making doing the shaking.

What is made is ima now here ma of ima and das the des the da the does.

I shouldn't look for k in d, for it has that d in made. But d in made is reversed ed, it's maed.

made ~ mad? (made mad? довели, свели (с ума (съ мя (из себя (вывели)))))
russians seem to see lead in that mead. land, mend (these just associations leading nowhere so far)

hand me ~ land lend me

land ~ lend ((закладывали землю когда брали в долг?))

rent ~ lend  (and it makes perfect sense. Right one rents, Left one linds lengs lends.
But then it disagrees, and rightfully so: lending is for free, renting is for money.
Lend and Rent are aligned with Left and Right. in political sense.
Lend is Land, Rend is стРоенье?
Lend and let could be synonyms. But then here's how meanings are easily inverted: I let him, he is let.
is it okay to say "it is let" in the sense of "it is allowed"?
Ответ
Yes, it is perfectly okay to say "it is let" in the sense of "it is allowed," though it's not a commonly used construction in modern English. Here's why:

    Historical Usage: "Let" in its original sense meant "allow" or "permit." This usage is still seen in phrases like "Let him go" or "Let it be." The phrase "it is let" follows this older pattern where "let" functions as a verb meaning to allow or permit.
    Modern Usage: While "let" is more commonly used in imperative or present tense forms (e.g., "Let me see," "Let's go"), saying "it is let" can be understood in the sense of "it is allowed" or "it is permitted." However, for clarity and because of contemporary language trends, you're more likely to hear:

        "It is allowed."
        "It's permitted."
        "It's okay."
    Contextual Clarity: If you use "it is let" in this context, you might want to ensure that your audience understands you're using "let" in an older or more formal sense. Context will help, for example:

        "In this case, it is let for members only to enter after 8 PM." - Here, "let" clearly means "allowed" or "permitted."
    Formal or Literary Tone: Using "it is let" might give your speech or writing a slightly archaic or formal tone, which could be appropriate in certain contexts like legal documents, historical narratives, or when trying to evoke an older style of English.
    Ambiguity: Be aware that "let" can also mean "leased" in modern English, particularly in British English, when talking about property or goods (e.g., "The house is let"). So in some contexts, "it is let" could be misunderstood unless clarified by further context.


In summary, while "it is let" can be understood to mean "it is allowed," it's not the most common or immediately clear way to express this idea in contemporary English. However, in the right context or for stylistic reasons, it's perfectly acceptable.


If I let him, he is let?
Ответ
In terms of English grammar and semantics:

    If I let him - This phrase means "If I allow him" or "If I permit him."
    He is let - This would mean "He is allowed" or "He is permitted." However, this construction sounds somewhat archaic or formal in modern English.


The logic of your sentence works in a simple sense:

    If you let (allow) him to do something, then in that context, he is let (allowed) to do it.


However:

    Current Usage: In modern English, you're more likely to hear:

        "If I let him, he is allowed."
        "If I let him, he can [do whatever action is in question]."
    Archaic Tone: "He is let" for "he is allowed" feels quite formal or old-fashioned. It's not incorrect, but it's not how this concept is typically expressed today.
    Clarity: To avoid any potential confusion, especially since "let" can also mean "leased" in contexts like property, it's better to use more commonly understood phrases like "he is allowed" or "he is permitted."


So, while "If I let him, he is let" could be understood in the right context, it sounds unusual in modern English. A more natural way to convey the same meaning would be:

    "If I let him, he's allowed."
    "If I allow him, he's permitted."


This ensures clarity and aligns with contemporary language use.

""let" can also mean "leased" in contexts like property"


姦 (three 女's) is often believed to stand for noise, and in japanese it seems to also stand for noisy, but more common it is a word for wicked, evil (which may reflect the way modern culture sees the ancients culture to which the cult of three mothers belongs)



deuil [да́и́] горе, траур, тяжёлая утрата
> Hi, Pi! Is french deuil cognate of devil?
Hello! 😄 That's an interesting question. At first glance, "deuil" and "devil" might look similar, but they are not cognates. "Deuil" is a French word that means "mourning" or "grief", while "devil" comes from the Greek word "diabolos" which means "slanderer" or "accuser". So, even though they might look similar, they come from different roots and have different meanings.
are they homographs?
No, "deuil" and "devil" are not homographs. Homographs are words that have the same spelling but different meanings. Since "deuil" is a French word and "devil" is an English word, they are not considered homographs. They are simply two words from different languages that happen to have some visual similarities. 😊
and if deuil is written in the old orthography, in which u and v were the same letter?
Ah, that's a good point! In the old French orthography, "u" and "v" were indeed used interchangeably. In that case, "deuil" could have been written as "devil" in Old French, which could make them look even more similar. However, even in this case, they would still not be considered homographs or cognates, because they are words from different languages and have different meanings. It's just a fascinating coincidence! 😄1pp

«Greek word "diabolos" which means "slanderer" or "accuser"» slanderer from the accused


ФР [fr] is another pair of double labial and single lingual
But then somebody could read it as ФP[fp] which gave birth to doubleness denoting fricativeness of singular linguals' counterparts. C and S, Ц Щ (Ч Ш)
and Λ Ν also follow this pattern: shorter Λ is half the size of N, if you see the central stroke double. Since I saw F and Г a pair, Ν and Λ are great pair. Just a different doubling of the same Λ, thus ΛΜΝ
and it makes me wonder if EFГ such a trinity, or is it's EFГI
MNΛ of IMNΛ of Immanuel sets them the way EFГI go from big to small. And I is half the Λ, so was EFГI MNΛI? was i o? was I ו? or ا?

In the context of ФР I can only wonder if it can be seen in hebrew: כפרךף
If פ is double ר, if ר is ך and פ is ף the way כ is ך

Is it why ר is amongst doubles? And here I notice that those others are the doubles too.

Is it why ר looks like ד? for דת is the third part in the BGD~PKT

In this context ר is ר,

In this context ר is ד. So similar they look that at first I didn't even notice the previous line.

ד and ר probably were separated when another planet was noticed. Let's see who they are.


And of course ר is meRcuRy, and I was expecting it, for it is a special planet: you cannot see it on the starry sky, it was discovered the last, on a sun. passing across the sun. Are sun spots such mercuries? are there more? There are much more celestial objects between us and the sun.
I read about it somewhere, now I read some wiki, and it tells that people knew about it looong ago, yet:
and here they compare them to tarot numerically:

And here that mercury stands first. Is it like Aleph? is R A? возничий солнца? This is the pre-clinical study, if I dare to say so, pre-academic study it is. So it is speculative, I shall check those facts through and through.
In ancient China, Mercury was known as "the Hour Star" (Chen-xing 辰星). It was associated with the direction north and the phase of water in the Five Phases system of metaphysics.[156] Modern Chinese, Korean, Japanese and Vietnamese cultures refer to the planet literally as the "water star" (水星), based on the Five elements.
Well, this tradition obviously disagrees with hebraic tradition where water is M, which is as far from R as can get.

Огонь, вода и.. медные трубы (которые, наверное, представляют собой воздух, но по факту из твёрдой субстанции, земля по сути (что отражено и в восточной традиции, где метал и ветер едины))

In the context of ΡΦΨ ΦΡ reminding F Г reminds me of how much r reminds г, but in the greak alphabet the counterpart of Φ is Ψ (but in hebrew ר follows פ, and in greek r follows п and though the graphical side is different, the system persists (though I had to use latin г and and russian п, but glyphs predate alphabets, so I have the freedom here. Also check how hand-written r looks like the second half of π (which also can be seen as two ז's which may indicated that they're all the same pair. originally.

But then ז could be seen as double ו, which contradicts this idea like V and X do.
If I can use any glyph, ᛉ is the half of Ф. half of ᛄ (but am I trippin'? ᛄ is not f, but ᛃ with stav, j
And ᛉ is not only z, but also r, which makes ᛄᛉ Фᛉ even more eerily similar to ФР

ᛄ is also ᛡ, which is a, which raises the question of f and a being mistaken for one another
(that is about that wiiiildest guess that what they read as ᚠ is some form of ᚫᚭᚯ)


E M З is vowel, labial, lingual, and they sometimes look like the same letter rotated clockwise.
The nex stage would be W, and it makes me wonder if that's why they needed to add ω at the end.
 But the trinary sequence may be caused by the three visible phases of the moon, and rotating it like this could symbolize the way of looking at the moon as at a bowl, which rotates around it's axis, with new moon being seen like no moon. nu mun. numun



Look how latin mutates into english: pro reali ~ for real
yet g.t. recognizes regina pro reali as maltean "настоящая королева профессионалов", yet reverse translation is vera reġina tal-professjonisti, and for real pro queen is regina pro reali

of ~ for
от ~ до
(open or closed is the syllable mattered more than the element of the consonant)
but it is broken by in and на.. but they're different languages. of is от just as for is до, that seems that russians didn't haf f because they had д эт итс плэйс. Энд ит ис интристинг, бикос russians have f where westerners have th. But then they also have т where others have th, because only this is true: it is incorrect to compare фея to theology, because theology is теология. and th-fronting could be the ancient genuine pronunciation of θ. For фея is fairy, ф is f. It is not edited into more строгое предложение because it is my way to show how the thought process is happening. It is pretty much a self-dialogue, whether I play tennis against a wall of the thought patterns or it is a game with different sides of my own psyche.
fEN ~ тRU (of ~ от)
thEN ~ тRU (theology ~ теология (and that ))
 
θ is a word in greek:
θ’ • (th’)    Apocopic form of τε (te) (used before a rough breathing)
τε
    Alternative forms:    θ’ (th’) — apocopic before a rough breathing
                                   τ’ (t’) — apocopic before a smooth breathing
    Etymology: From Proto-Hellenic *kʷe, from Proto-Indo-European *-kʷe (“and”). Cognates include Mycenaean Greek 𐀤 (qe), Sanskrit च (ca), and Latin -que.[1]
    Pronunciation:    IPA(key): /te/ → /te/ → /te/
    Particle:    τε • (te)                (combined with καί) both
    Conjunction:    τε • (te)    and, also or untranslatable
                                          (after each item in a list) and
                                          (combined with καί (kaí), untranslatable)
Usage notes: τε (te) is usually considered to denote a weaker connection than καί (kaí). As an enclitic, it is placed after the word that it connects, or after the first word of a phrase that it connects:
    800 BCE – 600 BCE, Homer, Iliad 1.7:         [Ἀτρεΐδης τε ἄναξ ἀνδρῶν] καὶ [ δῖος Ἀχιλλεύς ]
                                                                      [Atreḯdēs te ánax andrôn] kaì [ dîos Akhilleús ]
                                                                      [the son of Atreus, lord of men,] and [noble Achilles]
Derived terms:     οἷός τέ εἰμι (hoîós té eimi, “be able”)
References:    ^ Beekes, Robert S. P. (2010) “τε”, in Etymological Dictionary of Greek (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 10), with the assistance of Lucien van Beek, Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 1457

That θ reminds me of russian proposition съ, which can play as and: я с тобой (me and you)
and here chaos гуглпоиска на monoliteral words in greek изрыгает:
το • (to) (weak personal pronoun) it (3rd person neuter singular, nominative) it (3rd person neuter singular, accusative)
что вообще капец, потому что в русском это тоже то. А э в слове это, похоже, хазарское.

овал ~ о~v & Ʌ~Λ
ellips ~ el lips?  yes, poetically it is very convincing, but if it is the etymology I doubt.
овал ~ of al the el of ellips? Or is it L-lips, because R-lips is 𓂋?
probably it is ab ovo: 𓆇 (egg in latin)

ab ~ of

a b c d  latin?
e f g h  german?

more examples like ab~of are needed.


Barbēlō (Greek: Βαρβηλώ)[1] refers to the first emanation of God in several forms of Gnostic cosmogony. Barbēlō is often depicted as a supreme female principle, the single passive antecedent of creation in its manifold. This figure is also variously referred to as 'Mother-Father' (hinting at her apparent androgyny), 'The Triple Androgynous Name', or 'Eternal Aeon'. So prominent was her place amongst some Gnostics that some schools were designated as Barbeliotae, Barbēlō worshippers or Barbēlō gnostics.
Bъ R Bъ L?


Ф is for Филин. соФа? Фа хохолки совы? Форма буквы говорит об этом, если F is 𓅓, those are eyes in Ф, so they cannoth be far from that, and yet it's very speculatory.



Babylonians are they Ionians?

Ionia, known in Old Persian as Yauna (𐎹𐎢𐎴),[1] was a region within the satrapy of Lydia, with its capital at Sardis, within the First Persian Empire. The first mention of the Yauna is at the Behistun inscription.[note 1]



goys are of god

jews are of jah

who is of бог?
rus is of бог, but why are they different words? And I see ᛒᚱᚢ sequence in it. and both г and s are c.
bro, брат, браза, бразаба бразабраза (брат за брата)
брат забирает как брат и брать
сестра тогдч точ тогда что?

ᛒᚱᚢ бру бурю́ меб бу беру. thru. вру. въ. поняв что между Б и У находится Въ, I understood.
б, у, в - all have meanings as words.  м does not. only мы, as only ты (look the same on paper, but т may have overstruck when it is т: т̅

буру
бог ~ рог
          род? yes, probably that too.


White race
Wise race
Wiss race
Weiß race
sWiss race
sWine race
Seine race.
Шайн рэйс
Шай рейс
щерясь ширятся ширяясь (вот за это я не люблю поэзию, подсовывает не самые подходяшщие слова. отход от истинности того, что хотел сказать ради звучности. Это просто значт всё, отойди, пописал, убирай. Вернёмся позже с новыми идеями сюда. в первый зелёный пол-тетрадки песенник уйдёт.
wide race (白い[ʃiroi] is white which sounds as and широ́к[ʃirok])

поразки порашки

Jutes are against anglosaxons. Russian jutes are. They want russians to fight their war.


aбge  аб де (отец где? гд в где отражает суть буквы g, которая и g и д)
e_д 69  as two ࿊'s  (ed as ebanuty dima, I suppose)
when we write 6 pen goes counter-clock, and it's because it's even, thus yin.
when we write 9 pen goes clockwise, and it reflects its being odd, thus yang.
eд are clockwise fish, but pen plays counter-clockwise in them (cursive of curse?)



࿅࿆
࿆
tibetan symbol padma gdan

࿅  tibetan symbol rdo rje (U+0FC5)
rdo rje    རྡོ་རྗེ    (In Sanskrit - vajra). Pronounced by Tibetans 'benzra' or 'benza'. Frequently one may hear the prayer:

    Vajra. (GD)    adamantine, vajra, supreme, indestructible, great tibetan mountain range, 1 of 27 coincidences in astrology, See also: sbyor ba nyer bdun, 1 of 28 astrological terms for harmony of influence in the destiny of a person, prince of stones, infallible, indestructible, unchangeable, holy, venerable, indra's thunderbolt, scepter, indestructible reality, indestructible state [JV]

vajra, thunderbolt, the prince of stones [diamond]. vajra-scepter. 2) indestructible, adamantine; vajra, diamond-like. (RY)

    Indestructible Reality. (GD)

Vajra. 'Diamond,' 'king of stones.' As an adjective it means indestructible, invincible, firm etc. The ultimate vajra is emptiness, the conventional vajra is the ritual implement of material substance. (RY)

<ba dzra> 1) mi phyed pa dang, indestructible; 2) Indian weapon signifying upaya; 3) 1 of the sbyor ba nyer bdun; 4) rdo rje pha lam, precious, stone, jewel, thunderbolt, the prince of stones [diamond] vajra see also under indestructible reality - vajra-scepter, indestructible, adamantine. (IW)

vajra; isc. immutable. (RB)

vajra; indestructible/ immutable/ adamantine. (RB)

(med) For the tibetan notice of the mineral Diamond see rdo rje pha lam.


Om Āḥ Hūṁ Vajra Guru Padma Siddhi Hūṁ
- the Vajra Guru Mantra in Lanydza and Tibetan script.  
(benza and vajra share the place as Б[b] and В[v] do)

Because I noticed alphabetness in Om, that makes that sequence very alphabetic, withy hūṁs as phonetic links between vowels and labials, yet it's merely a speculation, I can only guess so far.


࿇ TIBETAN SYMBOL RDO RJE RGYA GRAM
The double vajra (Skt. vishva-vajra; Tib. རྡོ་རྗེ་རྒྱ་གྲམ་, dorje gyadram, Wyl. rdo rje rgya gram) or crossed vajra is formed from four lotus-mounted vajra-heads that emanate from a central hub towards the four cardinal directions, and symbolizes the principle of absolute stability.

In the cosmographic description of Mount Meru a vast crossed vajra supports and underlies the entire physical universe. Similarly in the representation of the mandala, a vast crossed vajra serves as the immoveable support or foundation of the mandala palace and here the central hub of the vajra is considered to be dark blue in colour with the four heads coloured to represent the four directions-white (East), yellow (South), red (West) and green (North). These also correspond to the five elements and the buddhas of the five families with blue Akshobhya in the centre.

It’s also an emblem of the green buddha of the north, Amoghasiddhi, and represents his all-accomplishing wisdom as lord of the karma family of activity.

The raised throne upon which masters are seated when teaching is traditionally decorated on the front by a hanging square of brocade displaying the image of a crossed vajra in the centre, often with four small swastikas in the corners. This emblem represents the unshakeable ground or reality of the Buddha’s enlightenment.[Robert Beer, The Handbook of Tibetan Buddhist Symbols]






  Double vajra on throne brocade
  from a tangka of Buddha Shakyamuni











I can guess what it may look like to a christcuck, but horn is associated with divine in different cultures: бог~рог рассуждал я недавно () и Моисей рогат, но их бог сатана, с точки зрения гоев, но не помню чтоб образы гойских богов образ дьявола в иудаизме рисовали. Кто дьявол в иудаизме? Падший ангел. Рога Гекаты, Корова (но там безрогая вроде, но в индии одна корова, в норманизме другая. А если нет? Тридеви are Тринорны. р разворачивает букву? н~д, а рн~в
н меж м и д (меж mommy and daddy оНъ оНа оНи, наше (наш is singular, so e and s meet again))
the four directions-white (East), yellow (South), red (West) and green (North). These also correspond to the five elements and the buddhas of the five families with blue Akshobhya in the centre.
I see blue balls where I'd expect to see white with such text, but blue Akshobhya in the centre I see.


So many fields are never studied yet:

they could have some cryptic messages encoded into these girly patterns, and I'd never know
when they were looking for books they would probably ignore the clothes.
For retards burning a book is nothing special, but to burt an article of good clothes is absurd.
And here's a medium easily destroyed. But if any of them symbolize something is hard to tell.
Flowers are flowers, they're nothing special, but the double cross is more mathematical, the red and browl lepels have six crosse each, which is 12 stitches. Easily destroyed the emptied eggshells could be to crush them with one hand thus unweaving the embroidery, if it was something secret/sacred on them.

but then it is rather speculative.
But then there are ways to encode symbols more explicitly

but most of the time I would never know:

(that's chinese silk for 4th century BC (and it reminds norman woodwork))
and here is something else:

Hardanger embroidery or "Hardangersøm" is a form of embroidery traditionally worked with white thread on white even-weave linen or cloth, using counted thread and drawn thread work techniques. It is sometimes called whitework embroidery.
Hardanger embroidery gets its name from the district of Hardanger in western Norway, where it was known simply as hvitsøm (whitework). Traditionally, this geometric embroidery and cutwork technique was worked in white linen thread on handwoven white linen fabric and used only as trim on garments.
and then there are more obvious texts on embroided parts:

it tells that it's from Uzbekistan, but I wonder what are the letters. I recognize some hebrew shapes, but some of them puzzles me, just as why would hebrew was on a robe from Uzbekistan of all places. So it's something else, either way that 𓈖-like shape is a mystery to me, which makes them all mystery to me and then the other symbols are yet to be decyphered. I can see Ψ, but if it is or 𐌸 or ᛘ and ᛦ,
and there are some texts I can read:

And nyushu script is preserved by embroiderettes.
        Nüshu
It has been suggested that Nüshu characters derived from be italic variant forms of regular script Chinese characters, as can be seen in the name of the script, though some have been substantially modified to better fit embroidery patterns.[citation needed] The strokes of the characters are in the form of dots, horizontals, virgules, and arcs.[citation needed] The script is traditionally written in vertical columns running from right to left, but in modern contexts it may be written in horizontal lines from left to right, just like modern-day Chinese. Unlike in standard Chinese, writing Nüshu script with very fine, almost threadlike, lines is seen as a mark of fine penmanship.

Nüshu is phonetic, with each of its approximately 600–700 characters representing a syllable.
About half of Nüshu are modified Chinese characters used logographically.[dubious – discuss] In about 100, the entire character is adopted with little change apart from skewing the frame from square to rhomboid, sometimes reversing them (mirror image), and often reducing the number of strokes. Another 100 have been modified in their strokes, but are still easily recognisable, as is nü (女; 'woman') above. About 200 have been greatly modified, but traces of the original Chinese character are still discernible. The rest of the characters are phonetic. They are either modified characters, as above, or elements extracted from characters. They are used for 130 phonetic values, each used to write on average ten homophonous or nearly homophonous words, though there are allographs as well; women differed on which Chinese character they preferred for a particular phonetic value.[7]

Origins of NüshuThe exact origins of Nüshu remain uncertain, as no written records document the genesis of this script. Gong Zhebing, a pioneer researcher of Nüshu, collected oral traditions and stories passed down through generations in Jiangyong County.[9] These accounts reveal that the genesis of Nüshu is deeply rooted in local folklore and cultural traditions, blending myth and history.
basically those stories tell that Nüshu was invented to pass cryptic messages, which was the idea here.

A blanket, woven in Jiangyong and gifted to the writer by Yang Huanyi, bears nüshu writing:
Аракуль
ара күл is middle lake in bashkortan and bee ash in kyrgyzan (был ил тем эшем вековым?)
[ara kul]
ara is friend in some related languages, like bees are our friends, and middle in the name of the place between mountains is ништяк, озеро ништяк


lyrical ~ miracle


нашъ м.р. и.п.
наша ж.р. и.п.
наше ср.р. и.п.
наши мн.ч. и.п.
нашу ж.р. в.п.
нашо диалектное неше наше (наверное) ничьё? значит моё (было ничьё)
наша
наше нашей(шайки, коммуны, семьи)
наши (нашли)
нашу (наш~ношу)
нашо нашёл ничьё
нашу (наша~ношу)

спекулятивно? так происходит поиск. когда найду, будет декларативно.



Причём, в эфиопском порядок уже европейский: АБГД, тогда как на востоке он А ГДБ или ГДБ А


It's so obviously hand-made. It is lingam in yoni, or, rather it is a depiction of how the life is born.
Lingam in yoni tradition is what fucks the asians up. That is some deification of female masturbation, and even what was shown to young and impressive impressible me in 愛のコリーダ (L'Empire des sens)

impressive and impressible as for active and passive forms remind Ь and Ы as one is palatalizing, as инг, and othe is not as эд (ind and ed (but english e is not front row, not palatalizing))

Looking for why did french translate love as empire in both consequent movies (the second one is way worse, btw, and has nothing to do to the previous one, or maybe it does, I don't know) I found that no, there's no ai for empire, so no word play, but amongst all the cool and definitely related ai's like together(相) and yes is also ai, some wondrous ai I found: 曖 (Kangxi radical 72, 日+13, 17 strokes, cangjie input 日月月水 (ABBE), four-corner 62047, composition ⿰日愛)    obscure, dim, ambiguous, vague

That ABBE was a revelation. I didn't understand why abbe, as the word have a secret reading like that.
but the system beneath it is wut.. it lays characters alphabetically. If there's anything, it's this. If they know what I discover, they spilled it somewhere. And sometimes maybe also intentionally. What could be the intention though is even more speculative.

日 月 金 木   月 looks more like A, and 日 looks more like B, but they have their own order.
水 火 土 竹   f for fire is very cool. Somehow I know this order: 金 for kin, 木 for derevo
戈 十 大 中 一 弓     口 for R is very educated: it's in line with 𓂋 and ⵔ.
人 心 手 口 尸 廿 the sequence repeats english alphabet  (and 一 for m (not i!) is of 𓈖[n])
山 女 田 卜 難                and does that twist in the end. also no z (what did they know)
u   v   w   y   x            and thus aligns into the axial symmetry if y is consonant.
v is voor vulva, 田 as double 山 is super cool. graphically they are. and maybe fields were between mountains (water from both sides, but then military would fuck such farmers up by their marches)

難 for x is the most difficult of them all, and indeed its name is troublesome, difficulty, trouble, etc.. but it's [nan] like nani(what) is probably of that x.
難しい [muzukashi]

戈 for I is spear. And that spear looks so much like 我 and no shit, that 我 is a complex stuff. The other part is 𠂌, which doesn't seem to have any meaning.. weird, huh. just a radical, which also gave birth to
乎, in, at, to do and some other important meanings in both chinese, japanese and korean)
手, hand (from this one very many other characters originate)
And yet 𠂌 is not 千, which is a thousand. Is it about the stars? for it's the reverse of the next one. or 士
土 for G is great, for 土 is Gea. I thought it was sun? I am what? I am weird. I wander.

竹 looks like H, but it's bamboo, which is read as take, chiku, yet bamboo sword 竹刀 is shinai

I'm sorry if these parts are mundane, it so happened that I also use this journal to study languages, it happened so by accident, but was never corrected, because often it leads to some related thoughts. The journals are to be seeked through anyway, they're unreadable and frankly mostly pride makes me lay it out. Well, and responsibility too, let's be honest: if it's online while I'm alive there're more chances it's not lost eventually without much impact.

埃[ai] is both one ten-billionth and Egypt (which is short for 埃及 [エジプト])
合い[ai] is демисезонная одежда. 合looking so much like Ao
合[ごう] 1. gō; traditional unit of volume, approx. 180 ml​
2. gō; traditional unit of area, approx 0.33 square meters​
.....5. sum; total
...... there are seven more, but you better look how much 合 reminds Го too. Гio. or isn't it Гō !
合い[ai] is also together, condition,situation,state, -ish. (Other forms: 合【あい】)
合う[au] is to come together, to merge, to unite (as a and u) to meet, to fit, to match, to suit, to agree with, to be correct, to be profitable, to be equitable, to do to each other, to do together.

it's shocking, that in all these years I still don't know five out of those 25, and I'm not sure about other 2.
(but knew (弓 I knew even better than g.t. did: it translated it into russian as поклон, which is also bow, but that is completely different kind of bow as there are at least two meanings for лук in russian))

日sun 月moon 金gold 木tree
水water 火fire 土earth 竹bamboo
戈spear 十ten 大big 中middle 一one 弓bow for arrows
人man 心heart 手hand 口mouth 尸corpse 廿twenty        S for corpse, which is shi, yet it's weird
山mountain 女woman 田field 卜divination 難difficult

it mostly doesn't make any sense.

金 in chinese reminds ring of a coin "chin" (in japanese it's kin, both are C)
木 is mu in chinese, and ki in japanese. similarity of ki and kin reminds me that they're both 土
土 is [thǔ] in chinese and do in japanese. and in that system it's G. was it some Ju before?

It begins as the ancient order or elements, the 7 of day of the week, they're literally named in that order, which resembles 7 notes, and without the sun and the moon there would be the 5 chinese elements.
from the most rare, which is gold, to good wood, to water, which is more valuable than fire. And even fire one may sometime look for. Earth can be found everywhere. Even in the sea it is not too far, below.

Then it goes more mundane, but some peculiarities about it are:
中 is middle, but it's not the middle letter, 一 is. M for the middle, not L. why L? Who knows.
Maybe there were some reforms, maybe M used to be 中? for it looks somewhat like ᛘ. So maybe they even archived some texts from the times of before early literacy of the west?

十 is the tenth letter, J
廿 is the twenties letter, T

EI line begins with spear(戈 (which somewhat looks like E, but it's i, and it has some い-ness about it)) and ends with bow(弓 for N (and though I can see N when I tilt my head, nah, it's more of ל or isn't N double L? Λl))


Армения is Вірменія in Ukrainian mova.
Was that name supposed to have the first letter of the alphabet as its initial, and was it В[v] before?
(too many guesses, but that is to the collection of such B numero uno)


dork is задрот. Так тупые школьники называют умных.
в смысле бо́тан. Wotan!
              наботан (ботает по фене? балтун! ботать = болтать, говорить, когнаты! феня это от офени, видимо промышленников артели вне закона настолько шустрили, что на воровской жаргон повлиял их говор чудной. Очень жаль, что через эту призму их придётся рассматривать, а потому не сильно хочется. пусть ии разберётся, ей вроде бы всё равно)
мне до фени значит мне до пизды (похуй)

но ботаник это может не феня, может школьный слэнг отдельно? ботанику изучать? зачем?

When we take can be shortened into with (enema is necessary when you take antihelmintics, you are not supposed to mix them, so I put antihelmintics into a singular form) in that example with is just a shorter version of the same. When Iou Take _ה... het is in hebrew the, which is even closer to
Jutes are also them. The nation known under many names. Richter said they're different nations, I think he knows the language, so he couldda know better

WITH ~ When Iou Take Het (when you take that)
  ..but it wouldn't be as cool as that one, which came by itself.

When I Take Him (как в русском в мужском роде препарат. I как я? у англичан ya is ты, вы.
Это точно два народа. Язык рождался в межкультурной коммуникации.
Обтёсывался? прилаживался! русские немного украинцы, украинские немного полльские, польские немного чешские, чешские немного немецкие, немецкие немного голландские, голландские немного английские. Соседние языки более похожи между собой. Русский с японским с той стороны похож на удивление порою очень сильно. Удивительно что за языковое безумие происходит между нами. Смысл изучать языки сибири - найти промежуточные звенья между японским и русским. С каждой нацией свои отношения, в каждой своё посольство. С каждой индивидуальный (а не общий с соседями) обмен коммуникацией, и языком. языком.

За счёт этого сходство или за счёт того, что из одной группы народы? Русские с японцами грамматические конструкции общие имеют, т.е. разошлись давно, но были вместе. Почему разошлись давно? Потому что грамматические конструкции это базис языка. Но они же меняются! Но не все: прилагательный суффикс ий как давно имеют? а родительный падеж суффиксом но обозначается как давно? А I N M как 1 2 3 не имеющее смысла в нигде кроме японского. Нигде о ком я знаю. 1 i и в китайском, но 2 и 3.. Where did chinese take Ni? It's not chinese, in chinese two is aR.
Thus that boundary which didn't allow to put
     –       k        s        t       n       h       m      y       r       w
a あア かカ さサ たタ なナ はハ まマ やヤ らラ わワ
i  いイ きキ しシ ちチ にニ ひヒ みミ   ※   りリ ゐヰ
u うウ くク すス つツ ぬヌ ふフ むム ゆユ るル   ※            んン (n)                  ゛ ゜
e えエ けケ せセ てテ ねネ へヘ めメ   ※    れレ ゑヱ
o おオ こコ そソ とト のノ ほホ もモ よヨ ろロ をヲ  、，  ・。
 
but then another boundary (I guess I'm using the wrong word) is that there are i of ichi and itsu (there are also mitsu

I wonder what is Sino about that ni.. wait, the same source has it:
Middle Chinese (Zhengzhang)   
0 leŋ 
1 ʔiɪt̚  
2 ȵiɪH (二)  lɨɐŋX (兩)
3 sɑm
4 siɪH
5 ŋuoX
6 lɨuk̚
7 t͡sʰiɪt̚ 
8 pˠɛt̚
9 kɨuX
10 d͡ʑiɪp̚

and some modern dialect
speaks like that:

Hakka (Meixian)       
1 it¹
2 ŋi⁵³  liɔŋ³¹
3 sam⁴⁴
4 si⁵³
5 ŋ³¹
6 liuk¹
7 tsʰit¹
8 pat²
9 kiu³¹
10 sep⁵

The Meixian dialect (Chinese: 梅縣話; Pha̍k-fa-sṳ: Mòi-yan-fa; IPA: [moi˩ jan˥ fa˥˧]), also known as Moiyan dialect, as well as Meizhou dialect (梅州話), or Jiaying dialect and Gayin dialect, Kayin dialect[1] is the prestige dialect of Hakka Chinese. It is named after Meixian District, Meizhou, Guangdong. Sixian dialect (in Taiwan) is very similar to Meixian dialect.

Due to its primary usage in isolated regions where communication is limited to the local area, Hakka has developed numerous varieties or dialects, spoken in different provinces, such as Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan, Fujian, Sichuan, Hunan, Jiangxi, Guizhou, as well as in Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia. Hakka is not mutually intelligible with Yue, Wu, Min, Mandarin or other branches of Chinese, and itself contains a few mutually unintelligible varieties. It is most closely related to Gan and is sometimes classified as a variety of Gan, with a few northern Hakka varieties[which?] even being partially mutually intelligible with southern Gan. There is also a possibility that the similarities are just a result of shared areal features.[8]

Taiwan designates Hakka as one of its national languages, thus regarding the language as a subject for its study and preservation. Pronunciation differences exist between the Taiwanese Hakka dialects and mainland China's Hakka dialects; even in Taiwan, two major local varieties of Hakka exist.

that explains where japanese got that ni, from Taiwan, not mainland China?

But it still deems my I Ni Mi thing dubious. but all three are in katakana: イニミ

ー is taken by longis, which makes me wonder how did they know longis before one, and so instead of something 一-like they used the second best, something very similar to 1.


They say that イ is short for 伊, which sounds as yi and stands for he, she, it. thus literally one. 一.
So how many of their characters are variants of the same character?

 is definitely of 二, and they agree, but also sugest 仁 to be the origin of not only に, but also of ニ, which is bollocks, but then 仁 is benevolence and both 二 and 仁 sound as ni. I wonder if a story can be read if 伊仁三 are in one line like that. But then though ミis of 三, み is of 美. Beautiful. mi-mi-mi.


A B C D
A E  I  O    the graphic similarity is striking. And the fifth vowel, U, resembles V the most, and V is the fifth consonant in the first line in russian, but it stands after Б[b] which tells that nah
A Be Vi Co Du could it be? (a? another reason to consider it to be a later letter Be See Go Do)

Could Japanese know numerals from europeans? I N M? Could europeans know them from japanese?


Крупная ~ крутая.


Ж and Ш have that three-ness around them. They're lingual, and that depicts their third position, after vowel and labial. after I and V comes X, which is Ш. But wait, X is aklso two sticks. Was X Ж?

V and B (and both F and M, and W too, so do П (but not P, and not b)) have that doubleness about them
isn't P half Ф? Isn't C half S? It probably was a later tradition, when fricatives and plosives separated: hebrew demonstrate state at which f and b are the same letter, so are b and v, k and h, s and sh.

What if ᚠ was v? It stands in the position of vav, next to zaiyn, both are voiced, H is И,



亿 is 万², 兆 is 万³ (a easy way to imagine a trillion, when you can imagine ten thousand)




Here, the labials are not grouped together, but are in the basis of each line, which lines are aranged according to their articulatory features. Voiced plosives in the first line, Voiceless plosives in the second line, and the third line probably depicts letters even softer than that, and the four line is rudimentary, or, rather, underdeveloped, with the even more tender forms.

The way that even starting with b, it follows it with D, not G, makes me sugest that BD was the original order, the order documented by the Bornholm's alphabetic stonelet.

more of bopomofo you can ctrlF in this log



Идеи как абстрактные понятия похожи на деи (борги (gea of the бог бор?!

Но идея зверей внутри человека (паразиты самого разного вида и рода) чудовищна и отвлекает.


erect~arised (rectum is straight, so maybe it's of this word, either way my etymologies are speculative)

> How true is the following:  erect~arised (rectum is straight, so maybe it's of this word, either way my etymologies are speculative) ?
Ответ
The term "erect" does not etymologically connect to "rectum" in the way you've speculated. Here's a quick breakdown:

    Erect: This word comes from Latin erectus, the past participle of erigere, which means "to raise up" or "to set upright." It's composed of e- (out) + regere (to direct, keep straight). So, "erect" relates to being straight or upright in a different context from anatomical structures.
    Rectum: This term comes from Latin rectus, meaning "straight," because the rectum is the relatively straight, final section of the large intestine. It's from the same root as regere (to direct, to keep straight), but it has a distinct anatomical application.

Your speculative etymology linking "erect" directly to "rectum" due to the shared concept of "straightness" is creative but not supported by historical linguistic development. Both words share a common root in Latin regere, but they evolved separately to describe different concepts:

    "Erect" deals more with positioning or posture (standing straight or making something stand up).
    "Rectum" specifically names an anatomical part noted for its relatively straight path.

So while your speculation has a logical charm, the actual etymological paths of these words are more complex and nuanced.
> not from that word, but both are from the samer root? you're correct, my wording should be worked upon
Ответ
Exactly, you've got the core idea right! Both "erect" and "rectum" do indeed share the same Latin root regere, which means "to direct" or "to keep straight." This common origin explains why both words carry connotations of straightness or alignment, even though they refer to very different things:

    Erect focuses on the action or state of being upright or raised.
    Rectum describes a part of the anatomy noted for its relatively straight course.

Your understanding of the linkage through this root is spot on, and your curiosity about language is commendable!

I don't need academic community anymore. This Grok is as smart of any of them. The community has its connection, but since those connection lead nowhere, fuck the fuckers.
connection instead of connections both times were typos, but basically they show how weak my language skill is. I got my language not from the uni, and it shows.


Today I saw that they discover that our microbiome might be making us smarter (some microbiome, of some animals, they showed in their always flawed (look who's talking!) well not so good papers) but it's still not a good reason to take some random shit.

Did those who felt "presence" felt their own gut? Is god gut? god гад gut ..and goat would be associated with god on the other side of the spectre. And that could be not mono-dimensional, there could be more than just two sides: гад, goat,


беснование без-сознания
снование сознание? сон это наже сознание. свн свине свиден но думал про свайн. в сознании то, что знаем, в сновидении ве.. видения.
знание видение
сознание сновидение
сно со? вместе с нами там другая жизнь в другом мире?

сновидение совидение как сова? что? спит сопит сновидит? созвучия поэтичные. спит сопит сипит сыпет сыплет съпъльёт. сыпет одновременно с тем как пьёт? проливает!

И для этого требуется новый тип словаря.
но первая попытка слишком сложная вышла:

пьёт пей значит ртом. делает ртом. не ёст значит пьёст. пей это рот.. в еврейском! в русском по есть и па (папа по попе (после попе идёт пипи. pa the back? baq))

съ совместно; от, прочь; будущее время, как все предлоги, создаёт.
сыпет съ пьёт

позже буду достаточно хорош юдл для такого словаря

поёт тоже ртом. Я потому с еврейским пей срезонировал, потому что и у нас так.


ест зубами!
ес збу*? зуб?
я знаю только эс которая без зубов.

drinks  совсем другое слово dring (то что докторо прописал)
eats
ест
ем явно даёт понять что корень е. Е E at S? S Shin? 𓈖, 𐤎
𓈖 is told to be for n, but what if it is for s?

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z           


Mesmerized as the opposite of memorized



Me
We (Вы в английском подразумевает и говорящего (более лидерский английский,
Мы
Wы (в английском M и W едины, в русском рассечены)

Me мужчина
Wы женщины (со мной)


Succeed could be a female word: suck seed. She's mother like earth. Earth Mother She.
  her
their    heir is her

h ~ ה ~ the
r is от(как в киллер: от (того что) хи дид кил, хи с киллер.
киллер is for some reason my first -er word. And that is what I am. Ахимса!

My second word of choice was baker. Probably because it starts with B followed by a, so it's the first
Archer would be first, but I like B more than A (променял атца на бабу)
Baba Deda

здесь я попробовал рассказать это для русских, но оно останется здесь, так не пишут:

Жили-Были
Дед-да-Баба
Ели Кашу с Молоком

эта всем русским людям знакомая присказка, возможно, сохранила тайну алфавитной письменности:

Все знают, что согласные бывают звонкие и глухие.
Кто-то знает, что они бывают взрывные, фрикативные, и ещё какие-нибудь.
Но почти никто не знает, что они на самом деле губные и язычные:

Язык нечётный как Адам odd, символизм цифр таков, что нечётные мужские
Губы чётные как Ева even, символизм цифр таков, что чётные женские

Может потому губные буквы чаще двойные: сравни В с D,  F с Г, М с Λ, П с Г, Ф с Русской Р
есть у этой закономерности и исключения: b & p, но они представители другой симметрии:
Вторым и третьим исключениями является то, что половинка W, буква V, не язычная. А двойная V, которую знаем из римских чисел как X, да.
Но это объясняется тем, что на алфавите тех времён, когда писали ветхий завет, не было букв после Т, так что эти, видимо, пришли тогда, когда об этих структурах давно позабыли, но они прямо в алфавите, неподалёку друг от друга:

A B C D
E  F  Г H
 I  J  K Λ M N
O П Q R  S T
U V W X Y Z

Если мы заглянем глубже в историю, то можем обнаружить один удивительный алфавит

в процессе написания всплыла вот такая деталь:

б, в, м, п, ф (this structure is more harmonic than latin bfmpv. And here I understand, that this order is voiced-voiceless-voiced-vocieless-voiced, exactly the order of all the latin consonants: voiced (with voiceless eye of the fish) followed by voiceless with the voiced ball, voiced with a voiceless eye in the middle. k is not in the middle! It can be only explained by the linear structure, when it's the transitionary line, sonors, special.
A B C D
E  F  G H
I   J  K  L M N  or, maybe, it indicates that the order was different! I  M  J  K  L N  for example
O P  Q  R  S  T
U V W X Y Z

MariJuana
Mojo?
The word magic is of that mojo.

Не возникло ли ё после е, чтоб при помощи её реставрировать ev of Eve?



Ankh wedja seneb (𓋹𓍑𓋴 ꜥnḫ wḏꜢ snb) is an Egyptian phrase which often appears after the names of pharaohs, in references to their household, or at the ends of letters. The formula consists of three Egyptian hieroglyphs without clarification of pronunciation, making its exact grammatical form difficult to reconstruct. It may be expressed as "life, prosperity, and health", but Alan Gardiner proposed that they represented verbs in the stative form:[citation needed] "Be alive, strong, and healthy".

Ankh Wedja Seneb, the initial letters are vowel, labial, lingual.
    Ankh means "life" and "to have life", "to live"
    Wedja means "to be whole" or "intact", with connotations of "prosperity" and "well-being"
    Seneb means "to be sound", "to be well", "to be healthy"
On the Rosetta Stone (in line 35), the gods are said to reward the Ptolemaic pharaoh Ptolemy V Epiphanes:
"...The gods and goddesses have given him victory, and power, and life, and strength, and health [A.U.S.], and every beautiful thing of every kind whatsoever..."

ΔΕΔΩΚΑΣΙΝ ΑΥΤΩΙ ΟΙ ΘΕΟΙ ΥΓΙΕΙΑΝ ΝΙΚΗΝ ΚΡΑΤΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΑ ΑΛΛ ΑΓΑΘ[Α…]


Remember, earlier in this volume, I spoke of how ר is associated with Mercury?

ABC (Spanish pronunciation: [aˈβeθe]) is a Spanish national daily newspaper. Along with El Mundo and El País, it is one of Spain's three newspapers of record.
So, B is also v in spannish, just as in russian and greek, huh! И ударение падает на неё!
f is for flower (then B is for butterfly)

Cph as short for Copenhagen
co pen hague
NL nether lands Nizhnie Luga (no, I'm not saying that it's a russian name,



толкающий толкающим
он ~ им

он ~ их (один из них. них от они говорит, что корень ни. ни по китайски вы. а у русских они?)
is that ни me? для китайцев вы, для русских они? Русские не общались с англичанами напрямую, только посредственно через соседние страны.

но русские тоже знают мы. мы вместе с теми кто me? русские тоже знают мне, русские едины с англикосами в этом.

предыдущая версия была такова, что они значит немы, не мы. т.е. русские узнают ми в ни. Но как быть с них? ним? им? их? Это суффикс множественного числа и в чистом виде?

и ~ множественное число (пиорг пирог, но пироги)
и ~ ещё (и? значит продолжай, ещё)
и ~ они, но и он тоже: им может быть и множественным числом, и единственным,
В греческом мифе три богини судьбы породили пять гласных и две согласных (Б и Т)
В еврейском мифе три матери это три буквы А, М, С.
В норманском мифе три богини судьбы это три группы рун (эттир (ир это суффикс множественного числа))
*** (на все три утверждения по несколько ссылок)
..и это очень похоже на обнаруженную нами структуру алфавита (↑мелкий шрифт в два слоя)
Гласные, губные и язычные. Но в эттах они все перемешаны. Но, поскольку положение руны в этте использовалось для шифров, а руны значит тайна, всё может быть.
Если предположить, что руны были разделены артикуляционно,
например аэт (моя личная транслитерация. эттир это форма множественного числа, что за балбесы, в английском это aet, или даже æt) Urþ собирал гласные, аэт Berdandi собирал губные, а аэт Скульд собирал язычные, то это бы могло выглядеть как  что явно требует разбиения более многочисленного губного аэта на два (и 16 делится на 4 гораздо лучше чем на 3) язычных букв вообще всегда больше чем остальных. В английском алфавите они прямо разделены на два вида, давайте же разделим их и здесь: ᚢᚮᛁᛆ᛬ᚠᚼᛒᛘ᛬ᚦᚱᚴᛋᛐᛚᚿᛦ ..но я запарился. я по запарке поместил ᚼ среди губных (забыл вырезать из второго эата) она может принадлежать любой из других двух групп, но не губным. и разве ᚢ не губная? по осевой структуре борнхольма так и есть.

но гипотеза о том, что имена Урд, Верданди, Скульд отражают суть аэтов диктует что-то типа
  But then maybe it was welder futhark?
ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚲᚷᚹ ᛬ ᚺᚾᛁᛃᛇᛈᛉᛊ ᛬ ᛏᛒᛖᛗᛚᛜᛞᛟ
could be rearranged as
ᚠ ᚹ ᛈ ᛒ ᛗ
ᚢ ᚨ ᛁ ᛇ ᛖ ᛟ
ᚦ ᚱ ᚲ ᚷ ᚺ ᚾ ᛃ ᛉ ᛊ ᛏ ᛚ ᛜ ᛞ
And such separation exposes that they also had as many linguals as vowels and labials, even more.
But then if ᚱ is labial (as my earlier ideas suppose) then it would be exact number of 6, 6, 12. And because we can separate linguals into velars and coronals, let us do it.
ᚠ ᚱ ᚹ ᛈ ᛒ ᛗ
ᚢ ᚨ ᛁ ᛇ ᛖ ᛟ
ᚦ ᚾ ᛉ ᛊ ᛏ ᛚ ᛞ
ᚲ ᚷ ᚺ ᛃ ᛜ
and it made me recall that I placed N amongst velars in kiddi alfabet, so
ᚠ ᚱ ᚹ ᛈ ᛒ ᛗ  labials
ᚢ ᚨ ᛁ ᛇ ᛖ ᛟ  vowels
ᚦ ᛉ ᛊ ᛏ ᛚ ᛞ  coronals
ᚲ ᚷ ᚺ ᚾ ᛃ ᛜ  velars
how accurate it can be, who knows. I just had that puzzle, it nice to see that it can have a solution.


То, что российская пятая линия уфхцчшщ заканчивается шщ, которые явно от s, a не от т.. может щ от т? от ц? ц и щ 2 и 3 (ч и ш тогда тоже) эта запятая для смягчения в кириллице используется:

and sometimes for other modifications: sometimes even for noised voiced variants of glyphs


а у эстонцев алфавит ещё более ебанутый в этом плане:
The official Estonian alphabet has 27 letters: A, B, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, R, S, Š, Z, Ž, T, U, V, Õ, Ä, Ö, Ü. The letters F, Š, Z, Ž are so-called "foreign letters" (võõrtähed), and occur only in loanwords and foreign proper names. Occasionally, the alphabet is recited without them, and thus has only 23 letters: A, B, D, E, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, R, S, T, U, V, Õ, Ä, Ö, Ü.
Additionally C, Q, W, X, and Y are used in writing foreign proper names. They do not occur in Estonian words, and are not officially part of the alphabet. Including all the foreign letters, the alphabet consists of the following 32 letters:
and none of them aranges into the axial symmetry.

voice ~ noice
вас ~ нас         Достаточно ли это чтоб создать v ~ ν file? greek and latin are so alike, naturally they would have misreadings of their so very similar glyphs which sounds differently. And R is labial because russian Р looks like P, thus it was one sound and PR are a claster like БВ, ГД, ЕЁ, ЖЗ, ИЙ, КЛ? МН? here we have ЛМН, the ΛΜΝ, basically that is where duality breaks and trinities are at play: UVW is another bright representative of trinities. Let's find the other. I know OP ~ QR four, but can it be O P T  Q R S? No, lines of six lines are where trinities came. roughly. But is greek ΞΟ the duality? ΞΟ remind Θ and both letters are not in latin. both have the same H-like shape in as their centres. They are unique in it.



у башкиров Ө ө [ɵ] гласный

αβγδ
εζη            nah, not likely. but what if it was εϝζη? then it would be literally efgh
θικλμνξ                θ as ө? не охуел ли я? даже θ~ѳ дохуя натяжка
οπρσ/ςτ                            но что если подобно اון (читается справа-налево)
υφχψω                                                                өѳθ (читается слева-направо) триединость?
                                                                           اון имеют подобие в I и l,
                                                                           өѳθ имеют подобие в ⴱ и таблетке. so?


выжил из ума ~ вышел из ума (как из возроста, как сошёл)
жил ~ шёл?
жить ~ шествовать? блять никогда бы не подумал, на сколько всё-таки искусство=жэись
а быть что значит? сиднем сидеть?
в сравнении с шествовать: бедствовать? ого.

так-то исходник этой мысли

West Cyberian is cool that it's as if of Cyber, but the abbreviation is not pretty, so WS it is,
Yesterday I dreamed of an international club in the waters between US and USSR
Because my capsules shall make it possible to live in deep north.
Europe is destroyed so that whites invent new ways to live, so that they fly to Mars too.



I think I should visit the spot on the map I have never heard of. Geomagnetic pole.

The north magnetic pole, also known as the magnetic north pole, is a point on the surface of Earth's Northern Hemisphere at which the planet's magnetic field points vertically downward (in other words, if a magnetic compass needle is allowed to rotate in three dimensions, it will point straight down). There is only one location where this occurs, near (but distinct from) the geographic north pole. The geomagnetic north pole is the northern antipodal pole of an ideal dipole model of the Earth's magnetic field, which is the most closely fitting model of Earth's actual magnetic field.

It is the only pole which is on the land. Could it contain some treasures? If there were some really advanced civilizations before us, then they could leave us a timecapsule at a spot we would know to look into. But then this civilization goes on for so long, that it is the spot well explored already. But then humans are not very bright and that spot is difficult to obtain, so those scientists knowing about it would keep it in secret to whether find a chance to get there themselves or to pass it on to their children. So the vault may be still not discovered. It's probably covered in ice all day long. But they could expect us to be able to look through eyes uz ice. or they could hide it before eyes ice took it

Here I understand something:

If that civilization used that place, there is a village around it.