I was in my uni, and heard how a "teacher" told a kid "that's just your bla-bla-bla, but where's the analysis, where did you take from?" And here I realized what Pitina's "Lacks analysis" may tell:
it's meta-analysis. work with the sources. I never read about it anywhere, so "analysis" is not applicable. Why would they lack that prefix meta? Because they're ignorant or because to go through you have to lick ass so to say. Is it some satanic ritual. Maybe somewhere, but first and foremost it's a flattering.
Комплименты. Я их жоплю. Жалею. Жги ложь! Жалеешь? Жгиложь! г к как гласные?
ija

(думая как всё зло от баб, но и всё добро от баб, всё ради них, и все мы рождены какой-то бабой)
Всё из-за баб.

баба и папа не отличали? маму от папы не отличали? на каком-то доисторическом моменте, безусловно. дочеловеческом может даже. но разве мама и тятя не мой и твой? дети любят маму больше. если с братом общаются, то вполне такой диалог может происходить: ты иди с батей, а я с мамой останусь. но папа что за слово? может зафорщенное на позднем этапе? mater and pater?



Ьаьушка как дела? хуёшо (может быть что хуёво и хорошо одно слово? во the wo look like шо, and wo in what is шо in што.
ш is шо
т is то
and R~Y unity is seen in letter they literally call YR
ᛦ[(y)r](not ᛣ[q]?)ᛧᛨ
ᛉ[z, ks] not ᛘ[m]



подмышки ~ подмышцами
мышки ~ мышцами


монеты ~ мне ты
money ~ мне ~ me ~ money

are those falling out letters some auxilary words or some prefixs, presuppositions, suffixs?
god ~ g-d ~ г-дь ~ господь
gospod
g of the(сии[sií]) people d?
god of the people deus?
g of the people д
I used the method of first associations, naturally it is not good enough for a scientific publication.
But it is good enough for a



So, I met Budeyko today. And Shining North 1 notebook has some lecture (written with smaller script than usual. THat is whether level of excitement or uni years patterns switching on: there I do not .. the ths those four words were automatic, I don't know what it wanted to say)
B V E  are his initials, and that is alphabetic. Isn't this word having some высший разум:
А Б
А К were names of people helpig me with the book. SAT was of the guy coming before them, the one who helped me with the site. A Б was before him on the site. And I know A Б because of A K, and it may tell that eastern order is original. Europeans were surprised to see similar writing systems in the East: philippines must have surprised them a lot. Most of you do not even know of philippines writing system. A book of Diringer Alphabet calls it alphabet and it's closer to abugida and consonant alphabets that one symbol was written for a syllable. But then why this meta-analysis?
D G (or he is also G D is my first science editor
B V E was before him and is going to be the second in the second paper edition.
I didn't expect it to be like this, but it is B V  D G  E
BV GD EЁ ЖЗ ИЙ К ЛМН ОПР СТУ ФХЦ ЧШЩ ЪЫЬ ЭЮЯ
Was ИЙК one triad? initial-middle-final? k as final form of i?
the three meet playing the same role of family name suffix: паланик, духовный, джоли, к й and и are like в and н (v & ν) of попов и никулин (попов подобен куклачову и петросяну, и да, ян подобна ин, янц of Саакянц она же скорей всего, ибо Саакашвили имеет этот же корень, швили это сын. T.е. эти суффиксы подобны

can that play in english? abc def ghi jkl mn.. and try again.
bcd efgh ijk lmn opq(balls) rst uvw xyz

bce fgh ijk lmn OPR stv? no a? because БВ makes the double and A is not wanted. There are some other reasons to ignore A. Should I start a new file about it? A


strive ~ стараюсь

thrive~процветаю
through? like flowers. про~through? как в слове пробить.



How weird is that скорость света is c? neither s nor L, maybe because those were taken.
it makes it so russian. It should motivate russians to embrace science well.


    Eternal
 Immortal        it is natural for us to see these words as complex structures combined of simpler elements:    e ~ im, both are ã the no.    al is the same suffix (and maybe arabic article al(the))
mort is death, tern is probably term, time.
Time and Tott? Dead and Zeit?
Time ~ Zeit
Deat ~ Tot (it's as if germans more them further alont the three. But through each ring we may place..
we may draw circle among any lines three dots not layding on the saym line at once.

That there is ..whatever was the thought.

are tern the term and mort cognates? they (term and mort consist of the same consonants)
are time and death? are they both the D the T, Devil is Teufel. Death is Tomb and Turma is also bad.
is Tom in tomb turma? трюм? and b is being, vie. tomb is t om b (t of b, тупик бытия, точка of body.
It is a process similar to rhyme. Only instead of puzzling myself with rhymes I puzzle that very mind with other things. Like what are each letter. Now I came to the concept of protoletter, maybe something symilar to chinese syllables. Syllables. cough is one syllable. what does the word encode. Naturally twice as much letters do encode something additional.
c  o u g h
k a       f
ugh = ph? not always:
rough is like that, buth
through is not!
θ  r  u  (it's as if that f of raf is gh=th)
It's mind-boggling. SO let's not boggle our mind with it. Maybe that is what messed the english mind: a well provided work on erasing of the previous culture. Russian sloppy work is their pohuizm and here it comes up handy. And we're white, and not disturbed as much with the civilization, being so provinicial.


My best contributions so far is the lineal structure, the repeating oBD EFГ IML 8ПТ and the

vowels look like numerals:  A E I O U ~ 4 3 1 0 and V is tWo (W is 🤟, U is 🤘, V is What is ✌)



двойка как дьявол (из какого-то жуткого трип-репорта про клей момент с толуолом)
созвучны слова. два ~ дева. one ~ Odin? Он. не оне(они)? one же. уно.
В русской школьной системе двойка это плохая оценка, которая антоним хорошей, которая 5
2 и 5 зеркальные противоположности. левое плечо и правое плечо скорей всего. И быть может ג and ז, because they reflect each other two. And here is how it could be: vowels do not play:
sequence ו ז may tell that ב ד were their counterpart of the previous line.
And that makes both lines voiced. And the next line is sonor, and others may be voiceless, thus hebrew revealed the rudiments of that structure only preserved in russian. Let's reconstruct it on the basis of this observation:

א ב ד
 ה ו  ז
י  מ  נ
ע פ ת

those 12 emerged naturally, I didn't even have to replace anything, I just removed the other letters and it became like this. The way I did with armenian when I compared it to greek.

So let's look up the אבדהוזימנעפת
Your search - אבדהוזימנעפת - did not match any documents.

Those 12 make מ look like a combination of ו and נ.
The way ה looks like a combination of ד and י.
The way פ looks like a combination of ב and י.

אבד lost
הוז is not a word, according to g.t. but in yiddish הוט is hat.
ימנ is not a word much, but maybe it's Yemen, but ימין is right.
עפת is also not a word very much, so this hypothesis brought no fruit.

and those are not jewish months either.


How cool is that, that I was born in the glorious month of אב!
and that made me see או in אלול.
and then תשרי is the grand finale, the רשת the other way around for some reason.
but then that thing is lost, probably because only three months are dedicated to alphabet.
But let's check my madness level by seening seeing ~ seeking the alphabetness in the names of other months, and if I can see it, it's nothing, a fluke or imagination..
And it's hard not to see it in something which has initial א in 4 out of 12 months. And there's more: all except אלול go in alphabetic order.

And the other diagram shows how to count them, and isn't it lovely that jews themselves use the ancient heathen alphabet and forced the rest of us to worship some random nonsense.




And why are those shapes remind euroean letters which sound like them?!

ㄅ[b] From 勹, the ancient form and current top portion of 包 bāo, "to wrap up; package"
looks like b

ㄆ[p] From 攵, a variant form of 攴 pū, "to knock lightly".
looks like that b with storke in it, as if it is ᛔ
ㄇ[m] From 冂, the archaic character and current "cover" radical 冖 mì.
looks like П which does look like M

ㄈ[f] From the "right open box" radical 匚 fāng.
looks like C, but also has similar shapes with 𐌅 (F without lower leg?)

ㄪ[v] From 万, a simplification of 萬 wàn, "ten thousand". Not used in Mandarin anymore. (and thus unicode places it into the end of the system)
it's easy to memorize together with 万, 10 000, which is man in japanese, but wan in chinese, thus w~v
It also looks like russian Б[b] which is a from of russian В[v]

ㄉ[d, t] looks like modified ㄅ. From 𠚣, archaic form of 刀 dāo, "blade". which reminds me ᚦ.

ㄊ[t] From 𠫓 tū, an upside-down form of 子 zǐ and an ancient form of 突 tū
looks like t

ㄋ[n] From 𠄎, ancient form of 乃 nǎi, "to be" (a copula in Classical Chinese).
reminds N (and that 乃 reminds n)
ㄯ    type: syllabic consonant    general transliteration: n̩
Bopomofo letter ㄋ (nē) with a vertical line (丨 (gǔn)), which represents a syllabic consonant.
    (rare, archaic) A letter of the Zhuyin alphabet representing the sound IPA(key): /n̩/ (Pinyin: n)        alt. forms: ㄋ (nē)

ㄌ[l] surprised me by having a ל-like shape to it. But then maybe Balaban is correct on that there are so many forms that I can prove anything. But here I definitely see plenty of affinity. Other writing systems do not sparkle it as much. Like look at the next one, wtf, come on!
From 𠠲, archaic form of 力 lì, "power".

ㄍ[k, g] reminds everything along these lines: C, K, ᚲ, but not ᛃ, alas
and I wonder why they need it double, since in hiragana ku is く
From the obsolete character 巜 guì/kuài, "ditch". haha, г indeed, it seems k is always kaka (king only shits? срётся с соседями например)
and even more it looks like Г (formally it is г, not k, so first association is not always the best one. unless it thus links c to г more.

ㄎ [kʰ, k] this only reminds japanese かカ and poorly, so nah it reminds nothing. The first one!
From the archaic character, now "breath" or "sigh" component 丂 kǎo.

ㄫ [ŋ] sorta looks like ŋ
From 兀 wù, "towering". Not used in Mandarin anymore.

ㄏ [h] looks like Г, maybe it's russian Г for latin h? Hitler is Гитлер, патамуша г.
From the archaic character and current radical 厂 hǎn.
厂 (obsolete) cliff; habitable cave on a cliff
    Mandarin
        (Pinyin): hǎn (han3)
        (Zhuyin): ㄏㄢˇ
    Cantonese (Jyutping): hon3 / hon2
    Middle Chinese: xanX, xanH
    Old Chinese
    (Baxter–Sagart): /*ŋ̊ˤarʔ/, /*ŋ̊ˤar(ʔ)-s/
    (Zhengzhang): /*hŋaːnʔ/, /*hŋaːns/
those * are "reconstructed" readings, thus I would ignore them, and especially here I wonder what makes them jump so far in their assumptions.

ㄐ[tɕ, j, ch] looks exactly like Ч
From the archaic character 丩 jiū.     Alternative form of 糾 / 纠 (“to entangle; to entwine”)    to connect or graft a vine

ㄑ [tɕʰ, q, chʻ] aha, the single shape of ㄍ, and thus it is the C and that one is K
(it seems doubling making letters longer works the other way around in chinese. It seems there they consider doubling as making it firmer. This hypothesis is based upon some vague earlier observation, and from now on will be observed)   and what about the q transliteration? that's chinese ч [chʻ]
From the archaic character 𡿨 quǎn, graphic root of the character 巛 chuān, "river" (modern 川).

ㄬ [ɲ, gn, gn] and it looks like a form of Г
From the archaic character 广 yǎn, "dotted cliff". Not used in Mandarin anymore.
广 (obsolete on its own in Standard Chinese) house built to depend on a cliff
[Mandarin    (Pinyin): yǎn (yan3)    (Zhuyin): ㄧㄢˇ        Cantonese (Jyutping): jim2]

ㄒ [ɕ, x, hs] it looks like T, and only link to it I can have is that T used to look like X in some early antiquity)
From 丅, an ancient form of 下 xià, "under". (down)
compare it to 丄 (Hyōgai kanji)    Alternative form of 上 (up)
(it's as if the two are showing directions from the central line (and the additional strokes are probably to confuse the foreigners even more. Or for artistic reasons, as the 1 has those dashes too))

ㄓ [ʈʂ, zhi, zh-, ch] this one manages to look like both Ч and Ж at the same time (and also as Ш, Щ)
From /𡳿, archaic form of 之 zhī, a genitive marker in Classical Chinese.

ㄔ [ʈʂʰ, chi, ch-, chʻ] does it look like Ч? way less,
ㄕ [ʂ, shi, sh-, sh] this one also doesn't remind much.
From 𡰣, an ancient form of 尸 shī (corpse (thus once again shi the 4 is associated with death.

ㄖ [ɻ~ʐ, ri, r-, j (that r in the middle is their way to denote ж)]
Modified from the seal script form of 日 rì, "day" or "sun".
And it is a glyph cognatic to ☉ and a morpheme cognatic to day and Jah.
(was it always Jah? was it never Rah? is that R there because of chinese sources?)
(but then ⵔ is R in tifinagh, 𑀣 is Tha in brahmic, literally Θ. 𑀞 is ṭha in brahmic, ⵙ is S in tifinagh)
ㄗ [ts, zi, z-, ts (those are different readings, because they are in different transliteration systems, you should always listen to how speakers pronounce them, maybe some day I add this feature here)]
and it remins T with attached s or something.
From the archaic character and current radical 卩(military authorization seal) jié, dialectically zié ([tsjě]; tsieh² in Wade–Giles)

ㄘ [tsʰ, ci, c-, tsʻ] doesn't it look like Ц? and even more so as a ligature of t and s
From 𠀁, archaic form of 七 (seven, 7) qī, dialectically ciī ([tsʰí]; tsʻi¹ in Wade–Giles).

ㄙ [s] it sorta does look like s, the strokes are of ᛋ
From the archaic character 厶 sī (in japanese is known as I, myself, to be; in korean it is "any")
which was later replaced by its compound 私 sī. (which is I in japanese even more widely used as I, and then it may take some of chinese meanings, which are not I, but personal, self, selfish, private, (obsolete) Used by women to refer to their sister's husband, reproductive organ, genitals, to chat privately on the internet)

and those were only consonants, here come vowels, which they for whatever reason called..


ㄚ[a] From 丫 yā  and it looks exactly like Y, and the way ya is a reminds russian я which used to be аз (their name for aleph) and nobody knows why.
丫CH
    bifurcation; fork  (japanese seem to only know this meaning (but then wiki may just no know))
    forked
    (Beijing Mandarin, colloquial, derogatory) he; she (this meaning remind english article a, as if a thing)
    (Beijing Mandarin, colloquial) A derogatory appositive attached to second- and third-person pronouns. (Ithe sameO)

ㄛ [o] doesn't remind o much to me, even it's lower part is not good enough.
From the obsolete character 𠀀 hē, inhalation, the reverse of 丂 (obstruction of breath) kǎo, which is preserved as a phonetic in the compound 可 kě.
For pronunciation and definitions of 𠀀 – see 呵 (“to shout; to cry out; etc.”). (This character is an ancient form of 呵).

ㄮ     type: rime    general transliteration: e
(An early form of ㄜ, a modification of letter ㄛ with a dot above to indicate different pronunciation. )

ㄜ [ɤ, e, o/ê] it sorta does look like e
Derived from its allophone in Standard Chinese, ㄛ o

ㄝ [e, -ie/ê, eh] this one also looks like e
     From 也 yě, "also"

ㄞ [ai] this one takes some imagination to see a and i the ㄧ (see below) in it.
From 𠀅 hài, archaic form of 亥.
For pronunciation and definitions of 𠀅 – see 亥 (“grass root; twelfth of twelve earthly branches; etc.”).

ㄟ [ei] this one reminds ㄏ[h] but that's it, unless the two are wings (羽 [hane] in japanese)
(japanese once again screams to me of its importance (naturally their words are known in the region, probably some other, way more obscure, language is hidden beyond it: as some taiwanese dialect seems to be the source of their hanji readings, well, complicated)) in chinese 羽 is yu, I would never tell. Hane are way more like h and ei.
From 乁 yí, an obsolete character meaning 移 yí, "to move".

ㄠ [au, ao] it sorta looks like double somethin: two vowels different with only one stroke, and that lower part may be seen as o and u at the same time, and the upper part is some A without the rightmost stroke, or am I only stretching? From 幺 yāo (幺 can be substituted with 么, which is also Simplified from 麽 (elimination of 麻). Officially adopted as the simplified form of 麽 in the Chinese Character Simplification Scheme (《漢字簡化方案》) in 1956. ) it is cannabis, man

ㄡ [ou] From 又 yòu (and, again)
 it reminds katakana ヌ[nu] and a little less so katakana マ[ma] and check this out:

ㄢ [an] From the archaic character 𢎘 hàn "to bloom", preserved as a phonetic in the compound 犯 fàn
at this point it's clear that it's better to link them to chinese characters instead, but those who doesn't know them (well, why would they even need these characters then)

ㄣ [ən, en, ên] well, it sorta looks like the reverse N, the way it is in the previous "vowel" (now I see why they do not call them that)
From 𠃉, archaic variant of 鳦 yǐ or 乚 yà[13] (乚 is  yǐn according to other sources)
𠃉    Alternative form of 鳦 or 乙: swallow
乚    Alternative form of 隠 (to hide, conceal;    hidden, concealment;    pity, sympathize)

ㄤ [aŋ, ang] From 尢 wāng ((obsolete on its own in Standard Chinese) lame; crippled)

ㄥ [əŋ, eng, êng]  From 𠃋, archaic form of 肱 gōng ((anatomy) upper arm;     (figurative) minister of the emperor))
Doesn't it look like these phonetics are more ancient than the chuhan?

ㄦ [aɚ, er, êrh] From 儿, the bottom portion of 兒 ér used as a cursive and simplified form
儿: May be used to specially write erhua (or the rhotic sound) in traditional Chinese, in contrast with 兒／儿 (ér, “child”).
it reminds arabic ا ر (arabs write the other way around, hence the order and ر are reversed)

ㄧ [y, yi, -i] is how they write 1, and it's a part of a larger story:
一, chinese and japanese one, in japan it is read as i
ニ, katakanano  ni,  which is how japanse read 二 the 2.
ミ, katakana's mi,  which is how japanese read 三 the 3.
I wonder why here they're not such (ule une ul unless ㄋ is not the doubling of the same shape and unless ㄇ are not the same three lines)

ㄨ [w, wu, -u] doesn't look like V much (though the strokes are exactly those, and here it tells that roman numerals are not always what they seem:
From 㐅, ancient form of 五 wǔ, "five". Compare the transitory form 𠄡.
𠄡 in chinese it is an ancient form of 五, in japanese it is an alternative form of 五
[~v] is literally five, just as V (but it looks like X, what's going on here? Were they first counting with fists? then stones would denote fives and sticks would denote ones.
And what are the chances that it is by accident that the symbol for five follows the symbol for one!

ㄩ [yu, -ü] and it looks exactly like U
凵 [(Pinyin): qiǎn (qian3)    (Zhuyin): ㄑㄧㄢˇ]       (obsolete on its own in Standard Chinese) to open one's mouth
(just as M and W reflect each other, so do ㄇ and ㄩ (and they keep the direction too))

ㄪ
    (unicode keeps these two here, because they're obsolete. I placed them where the table has them)
ㄫ

ㄬ

ㄭ [ɻ̩~ʐ̩, ɹ̩~z̩, -i, ih/ŭ] From the character 帀. It represents the fricative vowel of ㄓ，ㄔ，ㄕ，ㄖ，ㄗ，ㄘ，ㄙ，though it is not used after them in transcription.
帀CH Alternative form of 匝 (zā) (Originally written 帀)
(literary or dialectal) Classifier for circuits or circles.
(dialectal) Classifier for times, as in frequency.
(literary) to surround; to encircle
(literary) to spread all over; to reach
(a limit); to complete a full cycle
帀JA  to go round; to make a circuit; to make a revolution; to turn round
all I can say about this one is that it's upside down ㄓ [ʈʂ, zhi, zh-, ch]

ㄮ

ㄯ


And after those bopomofo (let's call it Zhuyin Fuhao 注音符號.. well, maybe not) Hangul follows in the unicode (they placed the chinese phonetic writing system before the korean writing system: was it because they reserved some place for chinese, which they much later took or was it because that chinese writing system is more important?

ㄱ     ㄲ     ㄴ     ㄷ     ㄸ     ㄹ     ㅁ     ㅂ     ㅃ     ㅅ     ㅆ     ㅇ     ㅈ     ㅉ     ㅊ     ㅋ     ㅌ     ㅍ     ㅎ

ㄱ [k, g] looks like Г
ㄲ for k reminds ㄍ for [k, g]  in the context ofㄑ [tɕʰ, q, chʻ] (but ㄑ sounds different from ㄱ (yet both are legitimate C's even if not necessarily Г's, but then maybe some greek dialect palatalized Г, who knows)
ㄴ[n] reminds handwritten נ[n] which is reversed, but they also write in reverse.
ㄷ[d] doesn't ring any special bell, unless that is staveless d
ㄸ[t] is double ㄷ, the doubling makes them "tense" (see the table below)
ㄹ[r] is as if it's gd, which may indicate that korean r is lingual, like in Russia.
ㅁ[m] reminds so much, and most of all this hebrew m: ם
ㅂ[b] is a weird form, somewhat similar to b though. and looks like "dirty" ㅁ.
ㅃ[p] is double ㅂ
ㅅ[s] rings no bell  (this one and the next one are both s and t. What can it be? ת.
ㅆ is double ㅅ (and it looks like Ϻ, but that's a coincidence, but then who knows, right?)
ㅇ I think I saw another o-like shape for ŋ not so long ago, but I'm not sure.
ㅈ[t~j]
ㅉ[jj (whatever it sounds like, I have to watch some korean, and maybe I'll add a video beneath]
ㅊ[t~tʃ] this one is probably modified ㅈ the way ㄛ and ㄜ in bopomofo are forms of the same.
That ㅊ is probably of 大[taCH]
ㅋ[k] another way to double ㄱ
ㅌ[t] how many t's do they need?
ㅍ[p] and probably it's a different way to double ㅂ, sideways.
ㅎ[h~t] what is it? another t? weird, very weird.

those double dots confuse me, and here's the clarification:


The Korean alphabet is the modern writing system for the Korean language. In North Korea, the alphabet is known as Chosŏn'gŭl[a] (North Korean: 조선글), and in South Korea, it is known as Hangul[b] (South Korean: 한글[c]).[3][4][5] The letters for the five basic consonants reflect the shape of the speech organs used to pronounce them. They are systematically modified to indicate phonetic features. The vowel letters are systematically modified for related sounds, making Hangul a featural writing system.[6][7][8] It has been described as a syllabic alphabet as it combines the features of alphabetic and syllabic writing systems.[9][7]

what can we say of russian-northkorean friendship when I'm russian, and I know the hangul (we call it хангыль) and never heard the iother name. Chosŏn'gŭl[a] (I heard choson somewhere, no idea what it is) Joseon officially Great Joseon was a dynastic kingdom of Korea that existed for 505 years. It was founded by Taejo of Joseon in July 1392 
so, technically northkorean name makes sense, since that was the dynasty which introduced the writing system. But southkorean name obviously refers it to chinese, since хань is for ханьцы.

How jumped they are to the modern thing. Whatever is the original of the alphabets, it probably lays in plain sight. They may not be able to suppress writing systems, but they could provide the acceptable (by them) history of that writing system. Is it structuralism or not? That word is taken by Saussure's school. Naturally my method may differ, so let's mint our own terms.

Koreans primarily wrote using Literary Chinese alongside native phonetic writing systems that predate Hangul by hundreds of years, including Idu script, Hyangchal, Gugyeol and Gakpil.[17][18][19][20] However, many lower class uneducated Koreans were illiterate due to the difficulty of learning the Korean and Chinese languages, as well as the large number of Chinese characters that are used.[21] To promote literacy among the common people, the fourth king of the Joseon dynasty, Sejong the Great, personally created and promulgated a new alphabet.[4][21][22] Although it is widely assumed that King Sejong ordered the Hall of Worthies to invent Hangul, contemporary records such as the Veritable Records of King Sejong and Chŏng Inji's preface to the Hunminjeongeum Haerye emphasize that he invented it himself.[23]

The project was completed sometime between December 1443 and January 1444, and described in a 1446 document titled Hunminjeongeum (The Proper Sounds for the Education of the People), after which the alphabet itself was originally named.


What I'm saying is that at least Hangul and Bopomofo influenced each other and that Cangjie is not too far as well. The three should be explored in connection with one another. And probably some other writing system of the region is related to them.
Writing systems inevitably influenced each other, and if it's too crazy to suppose that Hangul (or its predecessor) influenced latin, it could be the other way around. Yet only further analysis may actually tell.



russian language is so rude: just as параша is something way less sacred than in hebrew, so is чухан an offensive word if it was not by coincidence existing in some turkic or other language, but was directly borrowed from vietnamese chữ Hán (From chữ (“character”) +‎ Hán (“Han”), calque of Chinese 漢字 / 汉字 (Hán tự))
At least it's a way to memorize chu as other dialect's form of ji the character.
Here, a much better sounding name for that writing system:
Hanja (Korean: 한자; Hanja: 漢字; IPA: [ha(ː)ntɕ͈a]), alternatively spelled Hancha, are Chinese characters used to write the Korean language.
I wonder if that is the etymology of urkrainian surname Ганжа, because my granny had that name.



日 月 金 木 水 火 土 竹 戈 十 大 中 一 弓 人 心 手 口 尸 廿 山 女 田 卜 難
is another writing system i have shown earlier. And they're surprisingly latin:
A  B   C  D   E   F  G  H   I    J   K  L  M  N  O   P  Q  R   S   T  U  V  W  Y  X
A for Sun
B for Moon  these two don't look alphabetic at all.
C for coin
D for дерево
E for ..not exactly  iaoue,  eau! [ё]
F for fire
G for Gea
H for ..bamboo! (b is made by h in japanese, but hm.. not as cool as others. Use latin, russian, french all at once and shy from using japanese something for chinese? haha
I for 戈!  Like seriously, previous may be a mnemonic thing (but then maybe there's a language combining all those indo-european roots.
J is for ju (ten, 十) but what is
L!? 中! why?
一 is M, which is nice only that I and M meet again, they also meet as I = me, and in the k-symmetry:

   J   I  H G F  E D C B A
K
   L M N O P Q R S  T V

弓 reminds N of bopomofo ㄋ
O
P  for these three I do not have much to say (yes, heart, p is of h too in japanese, but it's not much.
Q
R for рот, for ⵔ, it is very cool
尸(S) agrees with bopomofo too: ㄕ [ʂ, shi, sh-, sh]
T is for Twenty (I spoke about it, did I not? But now I add the comparison to bopomofo to it)
山 would look way awesome as W, but it is U. 山 is Шан in chinese (suddenly I love chinese. What if both nations participated to the script? Is it possible? Is it not? Of course it is more than possible, some elements tell that that's what it was, maybe japanese influenced chinese math. I'm sure there are plenty of books written about it.
女 (V) for vulva, vrouwDU(frauDE)
田 (W) field ~ wield? At this point these are nothing but a mnemonic stuff.
wield is to hold and to handle, hanteren is to handle in dutch.
卜 (Y) for it looks like upside down y and even more so because of イ
難 (X) and it even has the x-like shape in its left part.
no Z? how would they know?
X as the final letter is rather archaic.
Which alphabet could they use for that?



script ~ скрип'ed? как перо по бумаге



кинет ~ опрокинет



What if literature is watered down for a reason?


In Alphabeta Meminerunt Syllabaria (alphabets remember syllabaries) I said "myths speak of labials and linguals only. But what if it is only so for those who look for labials and linguals? B T are also voiced and voiceless. So are M and S. They probably were distinguished only on that mertric, because that metric is the most comprehensible to modern humans. Plosive and Fricative is more difficult. And greek myth seems to depict both letters as plosives (if the reconstruction is correct. I still suspect the modern Greek to be the true greek. And thus Β Τ [v t] and that is long letter being female, which I think symbolisms of yin yang agrees upon. And T is literally Tverdo (harD) in russian azbuka.

and yet in hebrew legend those two consonants are explicately not plosive: מש. And did they tell ש instead of ת to show that אמת without the dot is read as ams? was it a mistake in writing down a lecture from an illiterate wizard?


AMT are Agni. Mitra. T? Chross of Jesus it is to me. I don ot know hinduims like at all.

Rigveda is mostly of Agni and Mitra (fire and water) and yet though it starts with A. Because it starts with Agni, the second chapters starts with V, which is so alphabetic, like come on.

or are they AMT Agni MiTra? Why would I descend to hinduism? Maybe it is an accend? Why would I delve into it? Let's leave it here for those who like those texts. I don't know, yet


אֶמֶשׁ is last night, according to g.t.

But duck.ai surprised me:

> Is there a way to know etymology of אֶמֶשׁ? Do you understand hebrew enough to tell me why that word means what it means?
.
GPT-4o mini

Yes, I can provide some insights into the etymology and meaning of the Hebrew word אֶמֶשׁ (emesh), which means "truth" or "reality."

The word אֶמֶשׁ is derived from the root א-מ-ש (Aleph-Mem-Shin), which is associated with concepts of firmness, stability, and reliability. In Hebrew, roots typically consist of three consonants, and they serve as the basis for various related words. The root א-מ-ש conveys a sense of something that is solid and dependable.

In the context of the word אֶמֶשׁ, it signifies truth in the sense of something that is steadfast and unchanging, reflecting a reality that can be relied upon. This aligns with the broader understanding of truth in many cultures as something that is constant and not subject to change.

Additionally, in Jewish tradition, the concept of truth is highly valued, and אֶמֶשׁ is often associated with divine attributes. For example, in the context of the Torah, truth is seen as a fundamental principle that underlies the moral and ethical teachings of the text.

Overall, the etymology of אֶמֶשׁ reflects its meaning as something that is firm, reliable, and true, which resonates with its usage in various contexts within Hebrew literature and religious texts.

But it seems to be some fluke:

> Are אמש and אמת synonyms or were you speaking of אמת instead? Why does google's translator translates אמש as "last night"?
.
GPT-4o mini

You are correct to point out the distinction between אֶמֶשׁ (emesh) and אֶמֶת (emet).

    אֶמֶת (emet) means "truth" in Hebrew and is derived from the root א-מ-ת (Aleph-Mem-Tav), which conveys the idea of firmness and reliability, similar to what I described earlier.

    אמש (amash), on the other hand, means "last night" in Hebrew. The confusion may arise from the similarity in pronunciation, but they are indeed different words with different meanings and roots.

The translation of אמש as "last night" is accurate, as it refers to the time period immediately preceding the current day.

Thank you for pointing out the distinction, and I apologize for any confusion in my previous response!

> Is אמש also truth in some dialect of hebrew. In old hebrew, for example?
.
GPT-4o mini

In Hebrew, the word אמש (amash) specifically means "last night" and does not mean "truth" in any dialect, including Old Hebrew. The word for "truth" is אֶמֶת (emet), as previously mentioned.

There is no evidence in historical or linguistic sources to suggest that אמש has ever been used to mean "truth" in any form of Hebrew. The similarity in sound between אמש and אֶמֶת is coincidental, and they belong to different roots and meanings.

In Old Hebrew, as in modern Hebrew, אֶמֶת (emet) consistently refers to truth, while אמש (amash) refers to the time period of the previous night. If you have any further questions about Hebrew or its etymology, feel free to ask!

> So back to the previous question: What makese אמש the last night. Which part of it is last and which is night?
.
GPT-4o mini

The Hebrew word אמש (amash) can be broken down into two components that help convey its meaning:

    א (Aleph): This letter does not have a specific meaning in this context but serves as a prefix in some words.

    מָשׁ (mash): This part is derived from the root מ-ש-ח (Mem-Shin-Chet), which relates to the concept of "to be" or "to exist." However, in the context of אמש, it is more about the phonetic structure rather than a direct translation of "last" or "night."

The word אמש itself does not explicitly contain separate components that mean "last" or "night." Instead, it is a compound term that has come to mean "last night" in modern usage. The understanding of "last" in this context is derived from the temporal aspect of the word, indicating the night that has just passed.

In summary, אמש is a term that has evolved to mean "last night," and while it does not break down into distinct parts that separately mean "last" and "night," it is understood in the context of time as referring to the most recent night.

> What did אמש mean in the old bibleic Hebrew?
.
GPT-4o mini

In Biblical Hebrew, the word אמש (amash) does not appear in the text of the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) as a standalone term. Instead, the word that is commonly used in the context of "last night" or "yesterday evening" is the term ערב (erev), which means "evening," often used in conjunction with other words to indicate time.

The term אמש itself is more commonly found in later Hebrew literature and is understood to mean "last night" in modern Hebrew. In the context of Biblical Hebrew, there isn't a direct equivalent or usage of אמש that conveys a specific meaning in the biblical texts.

If you are looking for specific references to time or evening in the Hebrew Bible, you would typically find terms like ערב (erev) or phrases that describe the time of day rather than the specific word אמש.

It is correct about erev, so probably the other part is not too far from truth.
And I leave it here to show that it tells that it's a modern meaning. But then it makes the same mistake, so I leave hebrew to those who speak hebrew they way I earlier left Rigveda to those who can read sanskrit.

How did אמש come to mean the last night? Was it just invented by Ben Yehuda or did it eveolve out of something?
.
GPT-4o mini

The word אמש (amash) meaning "last night" is a term that evolved in modern Hebrew, and it is not attributed to Eliezer Ben-Yehuda alone, though he played a significant role in the revival of the Hebrew language in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

The etymology of אמש is somewhat unclear, but it is believed to have developed from earlier forms of Hebrew or from colloquial usage. The word is thought to be a combination of elements that convey the idea of "the night that has just passed."

In modern Hebrew, אמש is used to refer specifically to the night before the current day, and its usage became standardized as the language was revitalized and modernized. The revival of Hebrew involved the adaptation of many words and phrases to fit contemporary contexts, and אמש became one of those terms.

While the exact historical development of אמש is not well-documented, it reflects the broader trends in the evolution of the Hebrew language, where new words and meanings were created to meet the needs of modern speakers. Thus, it is a product of linguistic evolution rather than a direct invention by any single individual.

What are related words of אמש?
.
GPT-4o mini

The word אמש (amash), meaning "last night," has a few related terms and words in Hebrew that pertain to time and evening. Here are some related words:

    ערב (erev): This word means "evening" and is often used in various contexts to refer to the time of day when the sun sets.

    מָשָׁל (mashal): While not directly related in meaning, this word means "proverb" or "parable" and shares a phonetic similarity with אמש.

    אֵמֶשׁ (emesh): This word means "truth" and is phonetically similar to אמש, but it has a different meaning and root.

    לַיְלָה (laylah): This word means "night" and is often used in conjunction with other terms to describe nighttime events or periods.

    מִשְׁמֶרֶת (mishmeret): This term means "guard" or "watch," and while it does not directly relate to "last night," it can be associated with nighttime activities, such as guarding during the night.

While אמש itself is a specific term referring to the previous night, these related words help to provide context for discussions about time, evening, and night in Hebrew.

Are all the meanings correct? Also I didn't ask for synonyms. What other words are of that root?
.
GPT-4o mini

I apologize for the misunderstanding. Let's clarify the root and related words specifically associated with אמש (amash).

The word אמש is generally understood to be derived from the root א-מ-ש (Aleph-Mem-Shin), which is not a common root in Hebrew. However, it is important to note that the exact etymology and root connections of אמש are not as clearly defined as those of other Hebrew words.

In terms of words that share the same root (if we consider א-מ-ש as a root), there are not many commonly used words in modern Hebrew that derive from it. The root itself does not have a wide range of derivatives in the way that more common roots do.

If we consider the root א-מ-ש, it is not widely recognized in Hebrew lexicons as having a significant number of derivatives. Therefore, there may not be other established words that are directly related to אמש in the same way that other roots in Hebrew have multiple derivatives.

If you are looking for specific derivatives or related terms from a different root or context, please let me know, and I would be happy to assist further!

You once again said that אמש stands for truth. Please, clarify. is ש a suffix?
.
GPT-4o mini

I apologize for any confusion in my previous responses. To clarify:

    אמש (amash) means "last night" in modern Hebrew and does not mean "truth." It is not related to the word for "truth," which is אמת (emet).

    The letter ש (Shin) in אמש is not a suffix; it is part of the root or the structure of the word itself. In this case, אמש does not have a widely recognized root structure that includes a suffix.

The confusion may have arisen from the phonetic similarity between אמש and other Hebrew words, but they are distinct in meaning and usage.

Thank you for your patience, and I appreciate your understanding as we clarify these points! If you have any further questions or need more information, feel free to ask.

I have to use the ai, somewhat inferior to Grok, and I cannot even compare the two, because russian government blocks x.com, those faggots whould be overthrown.
Was altman supposed to substitute Elon? Because these names sound similar, but seriously, judies, you are pathetic subhumans, I hope you yourself at least realize that you're not as smart as you pretend to be




Рассказ Повесть Роман
isn't it lovely that all three are different size of ПРоза

ShortStory (Novel Tale Narrative Novelette) Novel
so that was just a fluke of russian terminology

Story: рассказ, повесть, сказка
Tale: сказка, рассказ, повесть    (so повесть is something typically russian, english has novelette though, and basically that is what повесть is. But then do russians know between


Повесть (by the form of the word I can say it is archaic: the root весть is archaic, we use it only when we need to give fleur of antiquity to it. And флёр is a cognate of fleur, but they would not necessarily undwerstand it. So my translation is what? I explore a foreign language and I contaminate it with mine.




I tagged Alphabeta Meminerunt Tyllabaries as
alphabet, syllabary, greek, latin, hebrew, arabic, georgian, ugaritic


Мороженое и Масло могут быть когнатами (оба хранят в морозильнике, молокопродукты оба. О! another o!
another m!

ם (the same shape in a local (mediterranean) culture
what is o for europe, but m for jews?
око and 目




but then wouldn't hebrews have m-word for an eye?












The left model is used in typography. The right model is used in television and such.

CMYK refers to the four ink plates used in some color printing: cyan, magenta, yellow, and key (black).

RGB (red, green and blue) refers to a system representing the colors used on a digital display screen. Red, green and blue can be combined in various proportions to obtain any color in the visible spectrum. (some other source tells "almost any color"

Notice, that Cyan Magneta Yellow are products of mixing Red Green Blue.

Rise sounds pretty much as wise.
I'm speaking of ᚱ being a form of ᚢ here.
And I can only wonder why is it ᚱ graphically closer to ᛒ than ᚢ is.
MЗWΣ
other clockwise sequences are ЗWΣM WΣMЗ ΣMЗW (зосим, wemz, smzow, in general there is none)

maður is man in icelanding. so that those mothers are three types of men are also possible.
If the alphabet was created by a woman, mothers are men, the humen, hymen, men as plural form of m.

If we compare MЗWΣ to AMS, then W is the only candidate for A, and thus it's not W, but Ѡ

MЗѠΣ

AMS ~ EMЗ (з the z the final letter.
(phonetically it would better be EMΣ.. wait.. it's ѠMΣ the cloclwise direction, because it's a jewish book: they write the other way around. And yet that is cursive, most strokes of which are counter-clockwise
ѠMΣ is not good, because ѠM is two large a swap. Unless they were the two.
ѠM as vowel and consonant. then EЗ are the other part. ѠM are labial pair, EЗ are lingual pair.


Is Moзes another reading of MЗѠΣ? It would be MѠЗΣ insteasd.
ЗEWΣ? ЗWΣ? E~Σ?
student ~ etudent tell that yes.
ЗWΣ for Zeus makes MЗWΣ of Mothers M-Deus.
Z ~ D (the lines are the same, are they not? They are

J at the M's place is Jesus or Jews. Evri they call themselves, but they are Jews and were called something else centuries ago, and so they keep on changing their ethnonym, and евреи of europe is like rome romale, egypt in gypsies. People of ancient nations are they? Or are they only larping? Jews often came from europe, just as they pretended to be russians in the 20th century, the same way they pretended to be germans and whatnot in the 19th.

This MЗѠΣ thing must be compared to ƆUCП, which I saw as <Ʌ>V, but then meditating on it some minutes ago I saw it as CɅVS the cows CƆUÇ, it is fine to rethink it, because I came to it from a different perspective: I saw them as CɅV ковы, as of k, and there arte three ko-вы: коза, корова и конь.
И конь (лошадь, ќляча) ассоциирован со смертью. Это помогает понять, что корова видимо связана с рождению (молоко) и это оставляет козе центральное место, и видимо это козёл.

cow
goat
horse.. english seems to entertain the velars here.

коᚱᚢ (корова (R&W meet again))
koZa
koNь (well, I definitely didn't see these Z and N coming. They're one rotatated into other whichever way you rotate. So were they the only to cows? cow of ZhiZn & cow of Not.
конь от go? come ~ конь (I meditated such a lot, it takes much more time to write it down. This go thing came with come being конь after I sugested that n~m, and why did I thought so?
cow ~ корова R V are the first two letters, probably Я and V the first and the second (or W was the only one, and it was B and that was the only first letter, without A, before any A (vᚲʌ [vkl] would be the three consonant groups, but what did I see? коза as z, конь as m, but why? probably I saw cow as ko, and I wanted me three mothers as endings, but since the memory is fading, I cannot be sure even less than an hour ago))

MЗWΣ CƆU ~ Mother Cow
But chinese may disagree, since they have a Ma for Horse. Ma, not Shi: ᛘ not ᛉ

MEШ or ШЕМ
EMШ are a good trinity similar to AMS the אמש
and thus they have the (hidden?) fourth mother (the new moon? the З)
ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש
wow, these three have seven letters between every two.

But let's play with the alphabet having those three forms:
Е Ё Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш
and there are also 7 letters between Е and М, but Ш stands too far away, Ф is at the desired place of seven letters from M, and here I see that it would be nice if it was W after U the У. But it's not, unless Ф is russian W. both V and W it is. Because Х is after it. And Ц Ч are like Z Y.. and where I saw it..
nah, in Cangjie was YX, they grouped Y to the UVW, where it belongs, Y is their fourth mvther.

Mother as M-deus links Thor to God. And something between the two words may be sacred.
ᚦ & г are positionally the same letter. R and D are veeery close by articulation, Russian R starts as D in phonetics, but latin R starts as D in graphics. I wonder if that latin graphic depicts that unity (that lingual R is known not only from russian, so it probably some more mediterranean language it was born into)



Mendeleev's work was published in few months after its first draft, and it surprised me and the comparison made me suspect that Russia was so much better back then in that account, but the answer was found almost immediately: his father was a head of all education in his oblast.
And Mendeleev's son had no connections and thus his project of a tank was never even looked at. That alone could be the reason why russia had no advantage on the battle field and eventually lost and had revolution which destroyed the country, almost destroyed the nation and it definitely destroyed the blood line of Mendeleev, even though he made some effort and had many children. All their lines died off: В начале XXI века из потомков Менделеева был жив лишь Александр Каменский, внук его дочери Марии[27]; он умер от последствий алкоголизма, не оставив потомков[28][29].
That son of his died soon of брюшной тиф


To what you what
To what I      said
                       did
                       had
                            the t is the d. it is id.

so d is a swashed t?
so all lines are the same line. the same amt is in the divferent vowel.
amn
efг

and the shape of the pairs may tell that they are syllables:
mi ni (me, no (to me, of me (mi is si then, M~Ϻ, M~Σ (they are like A which is a))))
fe ге
Bа Dа
по то
фу ру   (and фу qy (was fq fuck you? was it why bibleic alphabet stops at t? taboo (alphabet closed as t a b (and a probably was the french a, but then it was locked there for that. speculative? maybe. but still maybe nevertheless. t-b such sequence of the ring told that uvwxyz (666 excusez) was excluded out of the alphabetic prayer)))
Then we get only 10 symbols in the system, and what could they be?
1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10=55
55 can be split in 27 and 28 who are letters in the alphabet to be numeral and the day in four weeks.

B D
F Г
M Л
П Т
Ψ Ч

 (and were 12 coined by adding another vowel to the aeiou?

Ψ Ч is a new view, and could it be coexisting with фq and thus being the sixs sixth pair? the tabooed pair? english and other european do not have Ψ Ч, even though both ᛘ and ᚴ they knew. and because both Ψ and ᛘ are labial, and because those Ч and ᚴ are both c, let's declare Ψ Ч the runic pair. And let's speak of rudiments of runic in russian. The same way goths had alphabets always. So the book tells, the book of the 1799. And it also tells that pre-Ulfilla's alphabet was way more gothic. So what those cruxifiers do is a reform of the alphabet. And probably that's how JK appeared. Was it Il Mn? ΛΜ

Ж is immediately the runic connection (moon runes, lune rune)

Д could be seen as ᚦ felled at the side. or, rather it's ᚦ felled Д, the stave is the cut, and ᚦ is axe, while Д is derevo (tree) with those two strokes probably symbolizing the roots, and at the top it's cut only because it's our of frame.

ВІКТХ have identic runes, but then they are common amongst alphabets

З is mostlye unique russian and it is similar to runic ᛊ, which is even more so Σ. ЗΣ are probably a different symmetry: doubling change lengthes or labializes the letter, reversing changes its voicing.
EFГI ~ ΙΛΝΜ would be more consistent. would EZГI? to my surprise it also would. Are (F~Z) ~ (ᛘ~ᛉ)


si ~ see
oui ~ vi(di)
да ~ ? japanese form of japanese desu?
yes ~ ? then yes is "is" in that very same link.


So, back on track of that "reversing changes its voicing" thing.
Is h voiceless y[j]?
I think it's better we collect the voiced-voiceless pairs and look into the other reflections (so that maybe we can see some other reason of reversal, the way doubling is not only about making it labial)

sz are a great pair, and it totally reflects Σ3 thing.
pb
hy
and I think it is something I explored in the first notebooks, where I suspected T to be upside down Д

But most of reversal pairs are not about voicedness at all:
a) the aбgдe line has no voiceless elements to it.
b) dq are not reflecting into each other directly. of all the bdpq only b and p are the voice-pair.
c) tf are both voiceless and not the same otherwise
d) Бg are both voiced and not the same otherwise either
e) MW are both voiced
f) ИN also do not play this game

So, so far, that hypothesis fell flat.



бузотёр бузу трёт
(слово чьё значение ещё немного и я бы не понял. буза международное слово)
трёт треплет  (бузотёр тот кто крамолоу говорит


Angles Yutes Saxons?


жертвы го-венной машины.
как государство-то на говно похоже!
венной ~ военной?


очутился ~ ощутил себя
(видимо, от слова суть)
осуществил себя?
существо ~ съ чувство (способность ощущать мир вокруг - отличие живого от неживого)
вещество ~ въ чувство (материя, данное нам в ощущениях (материя от мять? (мять ~ имать?)))



Локи. low key?
Удивительно, что впервые я услышал это имя от еврея, в фильме Маска. Это они своего бога выбрали в этом северном пантеоне? Божество олицетворяющее их национальную природу? Волос чёрен как смоль в последующих голливудских его представлениях.
Боги олицетворяют народы?



редкая ~ как redhead


if it is in
 F T S N


Для чего слову "государственный" ст перед в? чтоб алфавитно от R в В перейти?
Сначала думал про русское В[v] но сейчас вижу такой кластер: RSTV
ה сударь (c d - RSTV (суд и РосТВ? (сударь тот кто судит, судья, judge, jude)))


верю ~ принимаю ~ беру
             прими ~ бери me

принимай ~ прин имай? приём имая?
подъём is not подън (полдень? по дън? по дню? понедельник?)
заём ~ займ (но заёмщик) зан? как в слове занимай. поднимай. т.е. не прин имай, а при нимай.
сравни эту гипотетическую форму нимай и снимай.
с как предлог отлично от с как приставки
с- is off, c is with.
one word from two different languages?
I use ? the way PIE theorist use * (but my grammar is more russian than theirs (compare быть & to be))

to be ~ do be
быть ~ бы деять (быть чтобы деять? (быть для деять? бы в быть то же самое отдельное бы?!))
! indicates a strong hypothesis. but then not necessarily always, like it probably is, but also maybe not.

Some unexpected АВГД in an american desert. Was it a present from their part of this world for writing down that it would be cool to sing ERIKA as AMERICA?

or is it АБГ and the fourth element is the sun, and the thing below is water. And thus AБГ is the third element, three states of the matter is it?


The first and the last letters in the line seem to have tendency to remind each other:
a~d
e~θ (I found it in E~ה~Θ, and e~θ are even closer)
i~l (in the ImMaNueL universe)
o~σ (ס: shin is samekh?)
υ~y?
(and then there's also И & N, and E & З too)

a~d compared to B/D rings so loud with B looking like Ⱁ and aa being o



å B D
a is vowel d
o is vowel b
u is vowel v (and just as o and u are b and v so: u is more o than o, v is more b than b. longer, deeper)
v is въ, in. inn! just as бить and быть are cognates.

бы = будучи. окончания иные грамматически лишь гкрутят
бо = и бо, потому что
ба = ух ты! ба!
бе = бе-бе-бе
би = би-би
бю, бё, бя are not semantically meaningful. free words. I wonder why.
бэ is the name of the letter.
бу is a frightening sound. бу, close to boo, or identical to it. boo(𐎁𐎛) which is фу is close to бе (𐎁𐎅)

бы = будучи, проверим: я бы сделал (я будучи там сделал (в общем, какое-то слабое предположение, давай повторим опыт))

бы = частица of subjunctive/conjunction, mood can be added to translate сослагательное наклонение. sub and con becaust under and with: под

это черновик, извините за сбивчивый почерк.

ба (ба!)
бе (козявка)
бё (?)
би (бисексуал, бип, beep)
бо (bec åuse)
бу (boo)
бы ~ if
бэ (Б)
бю
бя

это не про алфавит, это про русский язык, совершенно беспорядочный.
в японском окончания более стройную грамматическую функцию несут.
погоди, в русском тоже, вроде

бегала
бегалъ?
бегали        endings a and o for female and male verb endings is accompanied by plural long ee
бегало                                                                    (that ee is also "more" in russian, plural suffix)
бегалъ?

бегаэт  (учи украинский сука, бэларуски, всё остальное вокруг, ai помогаi)
бегаю
бегая

бегаем (me, I am)
бегаете (эти (эт?))
бегают (тут? ют?)
бегая (but that's of the previous group)

бегае (-m, -t)
бегаю (io)
бегая (+ing? я=ing? ink? ik?)

э ю я.. откуда эта последовательность?

бегаем
бегают
бегая как будто вовсе не из этого набора грамматических форм.

бегаем
бегаешь
бегаете (шь(S?) and те(T) are both applicable to the same person from the same point of view (S~T)

те as plural form of s is counter intuitive, but may indicate that plural form is later. but that letter is used in делает.


русский язык такое месиво. никакого отношения к алфавиту? алфавит не для русского придумали? логично, тогда его не было. ё не окончание, а часть слова её. всё гораздо проще, алфавитная молитва.

Алфавитная молитва:
Абе Б-Г G-D DEus (u after E as vav)
S is in that line in russian alphabet (ЄЖЅЗ (e tell that there's no И in that line, that И opposes N ИIMlN? ИJMLN!))

ЗMIЙ? isn't it a stretch? too much a stretch, an eroneus reading, a heresy (er as in better? does it tell to better it?)

ƆПС? ɔpqc? p of o as d of c? B~Ⱁ!



Ɔ and С also meet as ο and σ
e and θ also return as Є and З, and doesn't it make θ З? как the is зы. зея? змея?
чтож меня к змеянм тянет? второе событие может быть связнао с первым. А может потому что это то что з и есть: 𓆓 (and why does it look like ל? Could 𓆓 stand for l?)


goddess? θ

Yet why would ḥfꜣw be used for f, r, ḏ?
if ḥ was ה the the, then maybe f because of fꜣw (изображает бросок змеи с таким звуком, отличный звук) but if ḥ the the and h the the, then halaḥam is the L the M. And is that order changed because of them?


Grok delivers beyond belief:
Benzaitennyo (Saraswati), Kisshoutennyo (Lakshmi), and Daikokutennyo (Parvati)
One couldn't go more BCD if he wanted.
Japan is one of the main centres of uninterrupted civilization.

and again:
Theban Triad: Amun (king of gods), Mut (mother goddess), and Khonsu (moon god). Mut’s nurturing role resembles Lakshmi, while Khonsu’s lunar association ties to your moon-phase hypothesis, potentially linking to Parvati’s cyclical transformation.
This one is closer to ABC
And the alignment to Lakshmi and Parvati is the same.



English messes up with newbies brains:
if you though awsome and owful were confusing,
compare auspicious and ...did I confuse it with ominous or was there another word?
was it because it reminds опасный? odious?


AВД
ЕЖЗ
ИMN
ƆПС
VXY


Benzaitennyo (Saraswati), Kisshoutennyo (Lakshmi), and Daikokutennyo (Parvati)
compared to
Amun (king of gods), Mut (mother goddess), and Khonsu (moon god)

And I thought it would deliver the idea of K group being for A group. Because if BCD triad is AMC triad, then k ~ 𐤀
א is x in colloquial hebrew

and ל looks like diacriticized ר
       ל looks like ר with י above it.

:and this reading is probably a joke on russian transliteration of х[h] as kh (which is read as k by others)
(because I didn't see such spelling at the wiki page for Elohim)


remove keys:

maybe in ck it is also not needed. Maybe kill is ill? Maybe king is ink. Maybe k is kaput and king is ink when his kaput(head) is kapot. cup от. cut off.


Åmun Mut Khosu may be reflected in the order of OMKS (KS are X and two shapes of C, X as כC)


Here's a script looking way more intimidating at the first look:

but then you see how much പം looks like п م ا (with corresponding sounds (so though ه looks way more like the final letter of പം (which is one glyph! so that goyim do not know) but that is more of പഃ (which reminds me of herv letter, some old-russian h looking like 𓎛 (yet how sick would it be if those m and h were the other way around (in the context of double labial single lingual (I wonder if malayam has the opposite tendency or any tendency at all))))))

Also that ا is directly ा (which shows how much a is 1)
(arabic aleph ~ ा(ā). The Devanagari diacritic for the vowel आ (ā) and that diacritic makes that a longer, but didn't अ have that very ा added to the first letter of om? Is E that iom?)
Æ? ॐ  ओम्  ओ३म्  ௐ 
The syllable Om is referred to by many names, including:
Praṇava (प्रणव); literally, "fore-sound", referring to Om as the primeval sound.[21][22]
Oṅkāra (ओङ्कार) or oṃkāra (ओंकार); literally, "Om-maker", denoting the first source of the sound Om and connoting the act of creation.[23][24][25][26]
Ik Oṅkār (ੴ or ਇੱਕ ਓਅੰਕਾਰ); literally, "one Om-maker", and an epithet of God in Sikhism. (see below).
Udgītha (उद्गीथ); meaning "song, chant", a word found in Samaveda and bhasya (commentaries) based on it. It is also used as a name of the syllable Om in Chandogya Upanishad.[27]
Akṣara (अक्षर); literally, "imperishable, immutable", and also "letter of the alphabet" or "syllable".
Ekākṣara; literally, "one letter of the alphabet", referring to its representation as a single ligature. (see below)

Nagari or Devanagari representations are found epigraphically on sculpture dating from Medieval India and on ancient coins in regional scripts throughout South Asia. Om is represented in Devanagari as ओम्, composed of four elements: the vowel letter अ (a), the vowel diacritic ो (o), the consonant letter म (m), and the virama stroke ् which indicates the absence of an implied final vowel. Historically, the combination ओ represented a diphthong, often transcribed as au, but it now represents a long vowel, ō. (See above.) The syllable is sometimes written ओ३म्, where ३ (i.e., the digit "3") explicitly indicates pluta ('three times as long') which is otherwise only implied. For this same reason Om may also be written ओऽम् in languages such as Hindi, with the avagraha (ऽ) being used to indicate prolonging the vowel sound. (However, this differs from the usage of the avagraha in Sanskrit, where it would instead indicate the prodelision of the initial vowel.) Om may also be written ओं, with an anusvāra reflecting the pronunciation of [õː] in languages such as Hindi. In languages such as Urdu and Sindhi Om may be written اوم‎ in Arabic script, although speakers of these languages may also use Devanagari representations.

The commonly seen representation of the syllable Om, ॐ, is a cursive ligature in Devanagari, combining अ (a) with उ (u) and the chandrabindu (ँ, ṃ). In Unicode, the symbol is encoded at U+0950 ॐ devanagari om and at U+1F549 🕉 om symbol as a "generic symbol independent of Devanagari font".

In some South Asian writing systems, the Om symbol has been simplified further. In Bengali and Assamese Om is written simply as ওঁ without an additional curl. In languages such as Bengali differences in pronunciation compared to Sanskrit have made the addition of a curl for u redundant. Although the spelling is simpler, the pronunciation remains [õː]. Similarly, in Odia Om is written as ଓଁ without an additional diacritic.

In Tamil, Om is written as ௐ, a ligature of ஓ (ō) and ம் (m), while in Kannada, Telugu, and Malayalam, Om is written simply as the letter for ō followed by anusvāra (ಓಂ, ఓం, and ഓം, respectively).

There have been proposals that the Om syllable may already have had written representations in Brahmi script, dating to before the Common Era. A proposal by Deb (1921) held that the swastika is a monogrammatic representation of the syllable Om, wherein two Brahmi /o/ characters (U+11011 𑀑 brahmi letter o) were superposed crosswise and the 'm' was represented by dot.[43] A commentary in Nature (1922) considers this theory questionable and unproven.[44] A. B. Walawalkar (1951) proposed that Om was represented using the Brahmi symbols for "A", "U", and "M" (𑀅𑀉𑀫), and that this may have influenced the unusual epigraphical features of the symbol ॐ for Om.[45][46] Parker (1909) wrote that an "Aum monogram", distinct from the swastika, is found among Tamil-Brahmi inscriptions in Sri Lanka,[47] including Anuradhapura era coins, dated from the 1st to 4th centuries CE, which are embossed with Om along with other symbols.[48]

ओ३म् reminds יהוה but's that's apophenic)
३ is literally 3 (it's from the text above это из вики-справки выше)


Akṣara (अक्षर); literally, "imperishable, immutable", and also "letter of the alphabet" or "syllable".
it reminds the order of their alphabet. And A is the first letter. Is it their tradition? It seems universal. Is that A Om? Ă?


chandrabindu (ँ, ṃ
That ( is there by accident, but it makes it so much ᛘ (which it reminds (the upper part)))
(mut but it would remind m way more if it was upside down. now it's more of w. we~мы)


Compare russian and english pronouns:
these pairs:
Mы противопоставлено Wы (кириллица это затуманивает)
Me protivopostavleno къ We (when brits speak, they include ruppsians in we, but russians don't include themselves into вы[vi] and when brits say me, they don't include anybody else into it. And russians think that they're included into that мы. Maybe hence the

בא[va] is used for go in that silly movie which made me see how v and г are the same (thus г is read as v in чего) because so are a&d)
A Ve Da Fe Ga He Θa? Ee Ma Nee La Kee (low key is lucky)
O Pe Ra Se Ta? та~she (and isn't it unity of th & s)

A V D F G H Θ
 I M N L K O P R S     and it's nothing. G~K is nice, but Ho and RS are wtf

Google tells "let's go" is בואו נלך [bo neleh]
and then it translated בא as coming, and in reverse it told בִּיאָה [beja]
But that va is translated as לָלֶכֶת
vas [va] is this word on my mind?
But they never read it as va, it's bo. How could I mess it up so much?
[bo, robo]
as you can see, they do not use the dots, so as in chinese you have to know how to read it. you can guess though. so you can guess what chinese words sound like by their phonetic components if you know them.
So do french read the same words differently?
This word for one:
בָּא • (ba) (pa'al construction, future יָבוֹא)    To come.
(colloquial) To want (Used in expressing an unintentional or spontaneous desire) [with לְ־]
בא לך לטייל קצת?
ba l'khá/lakh l'tayél ktzat?
Do you feel like going for a walk?
(literally, “[Does it] come to you to tour a bit?”)
לא בא לי ללכת לים.
lo ba li lalékhet la-yám.
I don't feel like going to the beach.
(literally, “[It] doesn't come to me to go to the sea.”)
(only in imperative mood) let us/let's; used with the first-person-plural future-tense form of a verb to produce its cohortative.
בוא נדבר על זה מחר.
bo n'dabér al ze makhár.
Let's talk about this tomorrow.
(literally, “Come we'll talk about this tomorrow.”)
To enter, to go in.
Conjugation
Conjugation of בָּא (see also Appendix:Hebrew verbs)
Derived terms
בָּא בַּיָּמִים (ba bayamím)
בּוֹא הֵנָּה (bó héna)
בָּא לְ־ (ba l-)
בָּא עַל הֶחָתוּם (ba al hechatúm)
בָּרוּךְ הַבָּא (barúkh habá)
הֶמְשֵׁךְ יָבוֹא (hemshékh yavó)
Adjective
בָּא • (ba) (feminine בָּאָה, masculine plural בָּאִים, feminine plural בָּאוֹת)    Coming, next, upcoming.
Antonyms
קוֹדֵם (kodém)
Derived terms
הָעוֹלָם הַבָּא (ha'olám habá)
Compare Phoenician 𐤁𐤀 (bʾ), Arabic بَاءَ (bāʔa, “to return, come back”), Ge'ez ቦአ (boʾä, “to enter”).


In Bengali and Assamese Om is written simply as ওঁ without an additional curl. In languages such as Bengali differences in pronunciation compared to Sanskrit have made the addition of a curl for u redundant. Although the spelling is simpler, the pronunciation remains [õː]. Similarly, in Odia Om is written as ଓଁ without an additional diacritic.

curl for u
that curl in ॐ is for u, so Aum, read as Om

ௐ, a ligature of ஓ (ō) and ம் (m)
that m does look like Б, and with the dot above it. It's naturally   ँ • (m̐)
and that spelling supports the ওঁ form, and ஓ (ō) looks like Ⱁ with those two balls (that Ⱁ is of square glagolitic, in round glagolitic that Ⱁ is even more ஓ-like, and I wonder what that horn is. And if that o is some cow-bell.


ॐ  ओम् 
ओ३म् with ३ referring to the three-fold length of ओ (aou)
In ओम्  top-swash is that u-curl, but maybe not: ो    The diacritic for the vowel o
and the final swash is..
्    The virama or halant: a diacritic to suppress the default vowel after a consonant in Devanagari

ओ३म् with ३ referring to the three-fold length of ओ (aou) could refer to three moon phases:



Abhidharma is such an alphabetic word, and it seems to be an interesting thing to peer into.
(though that word is probably only accidentally looks alphabetic, yet the teaching is described in some exhalted tones, so maybe some day I can get into it. When Ai is allowed to quote human texts directly)




Vi (V) for water
Ra (Λ) for fire is fascinating really.


Buddha
Bija these are all alphbaetic words. Or should I say Baetic? BeauTy

люBeauлу (Тya)
l is instead of t?
LBL (a ring of some girl of a poet said люб inside, so it was read люблю)
label?
I label? Wasn't it whay A appeared? Hebrew does'nt need it, it's there by defaulty. It ways a syllabary.

Egypt's triliteral hyeroglyphs


 nj
т
n
токи соки говорят о единстве n ьт vm то и со, то и симе? или это м добавляет семантическйой близости? е t b и ыs

здесь я понял, что опечатки бывают двух типов: опечатки технические и опечатки подсознательные. И если первая группа является наблюдаемым фактом (неправильная раскдал раскладка, смещение рук относитаельно клавиатуры,) тно вторая группа является предположением: куто сказал что та у, те дал и а и т
порождены глубинами поздсознания, а гне технической природы, просто на уровне рук, мыясные опечатки? Но давай посмотрим на них на основе этого куска текста и поймём, несут они в себе сообщение или нет. Прошло какое-то время, когда я саказал себе что таким образом тоже можно гооворить, и если оно интересно им, нейронам, то окей, а если нет, надо прекратить себя бумучать и удалять опечатки, выделяя может лишь интересные типа бучаить а и стереть.

Кто гооворит потерял понимание, потому что его голова заняита говорением

дал а т у
г яы а о бу

если это что-то значат, то это какая-то хуйня которую может мозг тоже производит, но разумно отсеивает. Буду и я отныне неинтерсные опечатки стирать (удалил г в нгеинтересные)

и далее и о и говорит, что я предпочитаю гласные (надо это проверить по ранним абзацам)
и если это так, то может это чаще всего страсть к силлабической структуре текста?
(може (т была не нажата, какого типа это опечатка?) этот день ознаменован     отказом от сохранения опечаток. Столько томов, достаточно материала для какого угодно исследования.
Подсознания способно непосредственно подсовывать мысли, накхрена ему такое хуёвое средстов преедачи. Или просто хуй на них забивать? слво ху гораздо хуже чем средстов акое -нибудь.

Всё равно же через ии все проводить, они поймут даже где все а где всё.



ВСУ some typos are too funny to lose though (from now on let's only safve funny typos& ? all of them)
(eiwithougt even without editing? important pieces I will edit)
ВСЕ tell of such order being more based. bce is base, basis if you wish, based is in that sequence.
All (I II)

such are conceptual cognates (not phonetic ones)

BCE is an abbreviation used for Before Christ Era and also as Before Current Epoch.
AD is an abbreviation for Anno Domini,

BCE.. in that order E is double C, and B is the closed form of E in a way,
FᛌI? (ᛌ=ᛋ=ᛊ)
MnO?
MΛᛟ? (𐲓-like ᛟ)
Mᛋᛟ (𐲝-like ᛋ) can I link anything to whatever or is it all reall? ᛋ for samekh, but then some young jew told me that some old jew told him that "there are so many symbols, that you can prove anything", well, am I proving? I am observing. And the really fascinating structures like BD FГ MΛ ПТ and the axial symmetry, and the russian's voiced and voiceless even though this one I wouldn't remember if
P


In second chapter of Sefer Yetzirah letters are divided into five groups. And they misplaced ח and י for whatever reason. Is it because Η became vowel? Was it translated from greek?
And you should only read the Short Version. Because Long version messes them up hard when it tells how they're read. And probably all Ari Versions have taken that from the long version, yet I should compare them to really tell. Short Version just groups them without labels. And thus it is closer to the truth. Probably, it disqualifies all the other versions. And yet I have to compare 1562 an 1806 to know the difference. Yet it's progress that I know



א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
The way it should have been if the firsty group is vowels:
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת

Lets apply the linear edit:
א ב ג ד
ה ו ז ח ט
י כ ל מ נ ס
ע פ צ ק ר ש ת

naturally א ב ג ד do not have the black (the final group) because there are only four of them, but all other lines do have letters of each group, and here it synapses to Richter's pentagrams.




Short version rings true, the long version doesn't even tell what three mothers are. Maybe because it is told in other chapters.

Somehow the long version has two paragraphs less than the short one. But what was missing?
 But I compared the first chapters, and it was even more confusing: they are the same, yet rather different. Short version doesn't call him creator of the universe, only inhabitant of the universe and king of the universe. Shaddai is given only in the long verseion, which calls him creator of the universe and so my semi-educated guess is that the long version is censored version for the masses. And short version would be held hidden in the plain sight. It's worse than speculation, it's even more so just a fantasy.

This book is not about it, but I looked into it and it is exclusively on letters. Their connection with other concepts and the long version starts paragraphs with the same few words (thus being its title, are they not)

Let's arrange them the way Sefer Yetzirah commands:
I'm sorry for my scanner, that quality is not very good. Or should I ask it to take it slow via software, but I'm so lame at all that!
Crave for knowledge made me compare the two:


and these:


And once again, the long version has less of paragraphs. But short version ends at 6:4, while long version goes to 6:7
Yet we shouldn't go this far today. Let's eat this fish one piece at a time, let's compare these few chapters first.

Let's do it better:

Belimah is whether obstacle to stop the reader from understanding, or ten spheres of emptiness. Celestial spheres I suppose them to be, but that's mostly my ignorance speaking.
In Sefer Yetzirah the 10 Sefirot are always referred to as Sefirot of Nothingness בלימה (blimah).  Unlike the 22 Letters which can be expressed in speech, the10 Sefirot are conceptual, perceived in the mind.  And so are numbers. This image depicts the 10 Sefirot  as a Tree of Life Diagram with 3 vertical columns.  It representsthe human form as a reflection of the Divine.



Here long version messes in 2:3 with 241 instead of 231 (22*21)/2 (we multiply the number of hebrew letters onto all the letters except the letter, and then we divide it by 2 because before that we calculated the same links back and forth, and those are the same links. But then gates are also walked back and forth being the same gates.
This makes me think of the antonymy of for and of, от и до, были f, t, д the same letter? Such as Θ
but actually I thought of ב being the single meaningful letter, not paired. But it is seen as prefix. Okay, let's check it. But let's do it after these pages. ב made me think of во antonymous to of, weird, huh.





According to that book, roots of hebrew words are based upon two letters, thus monoliteral words are treated as prefixes.
But in other languages they can be a separate words alright:
(the data is heavily copy-pasted, yet in normal size for convenience)

(in mozarabic)    א    and
(in yiddish)         אַ[a]  a, an
(in yiddish)         אָ[o]  oh; exactly!
(in hebrew)       אַ־[ʾa-]   on, upon    over    about, concerning    Babylonian Aramaic form of עַל (ʿal)    


ב־ • (b-)    in    at    with    (in is like in russian: в)


ג־  (no such prefix)


(in mozarabic)     ד       of, from
(in aramaic)       דְּ־     (d-)    of,    that,    who, which, that, what   (like in french!)
(in hebrew)        ד׳[d]    G-d    (also four, fourth, Wednesday, as all other letters are also numerals)

חָ • (khá)    ha: a representation of laughter    Derived terms: חחח

here I suddenly lost interest, because ai can do it better, but that's a goldmine, I should have continued.

שֶׁ־ • (ʃe-)    That (both conjunction and pronoun), which, who(m), What
(here I'm confused, they gave (she-) up there, and it's how it's read with the three dots below and one on that horn, yet the next letter has sof a tof in those brackets, and then that is it's name, because hardly it is read that way, I seriously doubt it's such a syllabic glyph. I know it's not.
подобно русскому шо (что, what. w=ш, because positionally also is:
        UVWXYZ
УФХЦЧШЩ
is it? I knew UV~УФ,
(ultraviolet is ультрафиолет)
but W~Ш only if U~Ц, and to my surprise they're graphically alike, and Ч~Ц the way V~U
А а     Б б     В в     Г г     Д д    
Е е     Ж ж     З з   
И и     К к     Л л     М м     Н н    
О о     П п     Р р    С с     Т т    
У у     Ф ф     Х х     Ц ц     Ч ч     Ш ш

and just as russian, serbian doesn't lay down into the axial symmetry, even without Ё

makedonian can be arranged into axial, but that is by coincidence of 50% or something, it's not elegant, У sticks uncovered, poor, the same way russians do. poorly.

                                                        А а    
                                         Б б     В в     Г г     Д д    
                                               Ѓ ѓ    Е е    Ж ж    
                                      З з     Ѕ ѕ    И и     Ј ј     К к    
Л л    Љ љ     М м     Н н     Њ њ    О о     П п     Р р    С с     Т т     Ќ ќ   
                                                        У у    
                            Ф ф     Х х     Ц ц    Ч ч     Џ џ     Ш ш   
it's also as all of them:
А а     Б б     В в     Г г     Д д     Ѓ ѓ    
Е е    Ж ж     З з     Ѕ ѕ    
И и     Ј ј     К к     Л л    Љ љ     М м     Н н     Њ њ    
О о     П п     Р р    С с     Т т     Ќ ќ    
У у     Ф ф     Х х     Ц ц    Ч ч     Џ џ     Ш ш    

They slavs definitely tried to rearrange it to remind hebrew, in which ב is both б and в.


ת • (sof)    the twenty-sixth and final letter of the Yiddish alefbet (never found at the beginning of a word)
yet תַּלְמוּד is translated from hebrew into yiddish as תלמוד yet maybe that ת is not sof, but tof:


in russian it's way less complicated:
(but then I didn't include other slavic words (and wiktionary can help with that too))

a    but
б    would
в    in
ж   yo, do, усиливающая частица
и    and
к    to
о    about
с    with. off
у    at
я    I

а б вжик косу я?   nah, probably not.


in english it's even more simple: all they have are a and I, aI they have.
but if we include all other languages, using latin alphabet, it will complicat it maybe even more.
And what if we ignore writing systems and look at languages directly? That only ai can tell.

And I asked it to work on it. See the https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1922396518931165682


С З double when voiced in russian
V W double when voiced in german
P B double when voiced in english
K Ж double when voiced in russian
C S double when voiced in german
wait, what?

They may tell that S [s] but g.t. reads it as z in their very Samuel, Siegfried, Cäsar,
yet it's [s] in Gustav and even [ʃ] in Straße; ß[s] though, which is also weird
Z is voiced ts, thus it reflects the

aren't they arfavedic too?
aюрведа ~ alphabet

pairs such as CЗ and ГZ remind each other (but not ГF, unless both Z and F are forms of Θ or [j]ᛄ)

ᛄ[j] could be of ᛡ, being both j and h(ᚼ (and that rune is ctrlF'ed in the wiki page of the previous doppelganger, and as you can see, according to those tables the shape appeared around 5th century as й and then from 8th to 12th centuries it was both й([j]) and [h] to become exclusively h in the 12th))



What about ᛦ[(y)r](or ᛣ[q])? (you may click that image and ctrlF these glyphs there)
ᛦ appeared in 8th as r, became both y and r to 11th, and exclusively y to 13th to become ö in 16th to be the only reading in 18th (according to that table)
ᛣ is k (I transliteralize it as q due to its position in that Alphabet Stonelet from Bornholm) only in Later Anglo-Saxon Futhorc (ca. 8th c. to 12th c.)   

What about ᛘ[m](not ᛉ[z, ks])?
ᛘ is told to always exist, firs as ᛗ, it's even highlighted when you ctrlF ᛘ. Then in the 8th century it sometimes written as ᛘ, and to 11th century ᛗ is out of use, substituted by ᛘ completely.
ᛉ existed from the beginning until 12th century. They tell it was z & r until 9th century, and also was x from 5th to 12th. Does it raise question of correctness of the early transliteration? The question is always there, trust but verify, or rather never truly trust, always have in mind the зыбкость знания.

ᛘ and ᛉ coexisted 8th to 12th centuries, but in different nations, the way P and Р coexist today.
What is named by a word with initial x, z or r in english and by a word with initial m in norse?
Grok helped me out with Old Norse "men" which is necklace, especially with a pendant; and "ring".
And another of his or her guess was Raven and Munin(memory) and it also told me of the meaning of the two ravens of Odin: Muninn is for memory, Huginn is for thought. O M Х? М О Х?
Were original words kept in translations to teach foreigners the language of the fairy-tale?
It only works for those who analyzes their narratives the way I do, but not many do. Even arabic words are taken mostly mindlessly, most of people don't even know that allah is simply translated as god.
Even though we know what haram is, we misinterpret it as "something bad" not knowing that it's translated as запрет. Thus we get confused when we learn that kaaba district is called haram.
And it also offered zone~mark and ridge~mark, when I asked it to compare all forms of english and all skandinavian languages. What a miracle helper we've got. That's as if the world adjusted to my needs.



I read break as bleak. And I think I misread one for the other just before that somewhere.


Игла ~ Жало (иг ~ жа (огонь ~ жара))
игла ~ Агни because жалит ~ жжёт. сжалится ~ ужалить себя (совестью в сердце уколоть)

жа ~ за ~ из?
(разлечаются лишь направлением


Grok delivers oh so plenty:
>  If אב is father, can גד be god?

The question of whether גד (Gad, pronounced "Gad" or "Gud") can mean "god" requires examining its linguistic and cultural roles in Hebrew and related contexts:
Primary Meanings of גד:
Tribe and Name: In Hebrew, Gad is primarily known as the name of one of the Twelve Tribes of Israel, named after Jacob’s son Gad (Genesis 30:11). It derives from the root meaning "fortune" or "luck."

Luck or Fortune: The root גד (gad) in Hebrew relates to luck or success. In Genesis 30:11, Leah says, "בגד" (ba-gad, "with luck" or "fortune has come"), naming her son Gad.

No Direct "God" Meaning: Unlike אב (father), which has a clear semantic role, גד does not directly mean "god" in Hebrew. Hebrew words for "god" include אל (El), אלוהים (Elohim), or יהוה (YHWH, the Tetragrammaton).

Gad as a Deity:
Mesopotamian Context: In ancient Near Eastern cultures, Gad appears as the name of a deity of fortune. In Isaiah 65:11, the Hebrew Bible references Gad alongside Meni (another deity of fate), where Israelites are criticized for worshipping "Gad" (translated as "Fortune" in some texts). This suggests Gad as a Canaanite or Mesopotamian god of luck, distinct from the Israelite God (YHWH).

Semitic Roots: In Akkadian or Ugaritic, related Semitic languages, gad or similar roots can connote fortune or divine favor, but not "god" in the supreme sense. The deity Gad was a minor figure, not equivalent to El or Baal.

Comparison to אב:
אב’s metaphorical use (e.g., father as leader or source) allows it to stretch to divine or authoritative roles (e.g., God as "Father" in later traditions). גד, however, is narrower, tied to luck or a specific deity, not a generic term for "god."

In Kabbalistic or gematria contexts:
אב (aleph=1, bet=2) sums to 3, symbolizing foundational stability or creation.

גד (gimel=3, dalet=4) sums to 7, a number of completeness or spirituality, but this is speculative and not a standard interpretation linking גד to "god."

גד could be stretched to evoke a divine concept (fortune as a divine gift), but it lacks the direct semantic weight of אב for authority or divinity.

Conclusion on גד as "God":
גד does not mean "god" in the way אב means "father." It refers to luck, a tribe, or a minor deity of fortune in specific contexts. To use גד as "god" would be a creative or non-standard interpretation, possibly inspired by its divine association in Isaiah 65:11 but not supported by mainstream Hebrew usage.

If you’re exploring a poetic or mystical analogy (e.g., אב as father, גד as god), it’s plausible in a symbolic sense, but linguistically, גד doesn’t carry the weight of "god" without significant contextual stretching.

And this thing is alright, you may call it a search engine whatever you like, it is even better.
Here's wiki:
Gad was the name of the pan-Semitic god of fortune, usually depicted as a male but sometimes as a female,[2] and is attested in ancient records of Aram and Arabia. Gad is also mentioned in the Bible as a deity in the Book of Isaiah (Isaiah 65:11 – some translations simply call him (the god of) Fortune), as having been worshipped by a number of Hebrews during the Babylonian captivity.[3] Gad apparently differed from the god of destiny, who was known as Meni. The root verb in Gad means cut or divide, and from this comes the idea of fate being meted out.[4]

But then it didn't verify the sequence. But what if it wouldn't know גד if I didn't ask about it directly?
Father Luck is very jewish (and irish)
Г~L? because ck~c~g~d (and yes, it is more convenient to me to see those words as cognates, so I have less words. But then if I expanse the tolerance of my instrument, will it not make it less precise? I started taking r for l, is it a tendency? Well, even if it was, I'd take my chances to see the world from a different point of view (from times when there were way less letters. What if there were more? if it was somewhere in the past, there was a moment before that, when there were less, because I don't believe that it fell onto us all at once, we developed it one by one, glyph by glyph. And even if it came from somewhere, there they inevitably invented it one by one.. yes, some pre-writing symbols are the roots. Symbols appeared maybe even before what we now would consider language: language is many symbols, few symbols arre what? a simple code? Or maybe many of them appeared without our will? Were there more symbols in the accesory of an ancient beast only inventing language? Is expression of the face a form of language? Because there are few: sadness, happiness, anger, fear, love and shame maybe too, pride, intoxication, disease, pain, surprise, boredom; these are twelve, and I wonder what else is there. Intoxication can be different (as e and ё maybe) excited, extasy, yEah, I wonder when I can see the meaning of the letters or morphemes in all the words)
dis is "не c"? "без"? б&d are both two: bilingua, diploid. Could they both be for no? de-FR and buCH
Dog trainers also use one bark for yes, and two barks for no.

a~d because they're both of да
n~o are they alphabetic no?
дано = да + no? (вводные данные)

  no
nwo

  no
nato   not exactly my position, I think military should be unified. It didn't stop roman generals, though

n
o  (n at o)

That was somewhat funny, yet astray. Now I smoked again, let's see what the third bong brings us.



bathtab
tab as t & b, твёрдое и водное. твёрдое ~ т-водное? т от нет? или от от? от водное, из воды, в соответствии с тем как земля как элемент (всё твёрдое) is 🜃, and water is 🜄

Grok by xAi delivers:

אב (father, Av) – “Father” (Genesis 2:24). 

אד (mist, Ed) – “Mist” (Genesis 2:6). 

אה (ah, Ah) – “Ah!” (Job 39:25). 

או (or, O) – “Or” (Genesis 24:55). 

אז (then, Az) – “Then” (Genesis 4:26). 

אי (where, Ay) – “Where” (Genesis 4:9). 

אל (God, El) – “God” or “to” (Genesis 14:18). 

אם (if, Im) – “If” or “mother” (Genesis 4:7). 

אן (where, An) – “Where” (rare, cf. Exodus 2:20). 

אס (gather, As) – “Gather!” (rare, cf. Isaiah 43:9). 

אף (anger, Af) – “Anger” or “also” (Genesis 27:44). 

אץ (hasten, Etz) – “Hasten!” (rare, cf. Psalm 119:60). 

אק (cry out, Ak) – “Cry out!” (rare, cf. Isaiah 15:5). 

אר (light, Or) – “Light” (rare, cf. Isaiah 5:20). 

אש (fire, Esh) – “Fire” (Genesis 22:6). 

את (with, Et) – “With” or direct object marker (Genesis 1:1). 

בא (he came, Ba) – “He came” (Genesis 12:5). 

בד (linen, Bad) – “Linen” or “alone” (Exodus 26:1). 

בה (in her, Bah) – “In her” (Genesis 16:6). 

בו (in him, Bo) – “In him” (Genesis 7:1). 

בי (in me, Bi) – “In me” (Genesis 4:14). 

בל (not, Bal) – “Not” or “without” (rare, cf. Isaiah 14:6). 

בם (in them, Bam) – “In them” (Genesis 6:4). 

בן (son, Ben) – “Son” (Genesis 5:3). 

בס (tread, Bas) – “Tread!” (rare, cf. Psalm 7:6). 

בף (anger, Baf) – “Anger” (variant of אף, rare, cf. Proverbs 22:24). 

בץ (plunder, Betz) – “Plunder!” (rare, cf. Isaiah 42:22). 

בק (seek, Bak) – “Seek!” (rare, cf. Isaiah 34:16). 

בר (grain, Bar) – “Grain” or “pure” (Psalm 65:14). 

בש (shame, Bosh) – “Shame” (rare, cf. Hosea 10:6). 

בת (daughter, Bat) – “Daughter” (Genesis 5:4). 

גב (back, Gav) – “Back” or “height” (1 Samuel 17:40). 

גד (fortune, Gad) – “Fortune” or tribe name (Genesis 30:11). 

גה (shine, Gah) – “Shine!” (rare, cf. Isaiah 60:1). 

גו (nation, Go) – “Nation” (rare, cf. Genesis 10:5). 

גז (shear, Gaz) – “Shear!” (Genesis 38:13). 

גל (heap, Gal) – “Heap” or “wave” (Genesis 31:46). 

גם (also, Gam) – “Also” (Genesis 3:6). 

גן (garden, Gan) – “Garden” (Genesis 2:8). 

גר (sojourn, Ger) – “Sojourn!” (Genesis 19:9). 

דא (soar, Da) – “Soar!” (rare, cf. Isaiah 40:31). 

דב (bear, Dov) – “Bear” (rare, cf. 1 Samuel 17:34). 

דג (fish, Dag) – “Fish” (Jonah 1:17). 

דד (breast, Ded) – “Breast” or “nipple” (Isaiah 66:11). 

דף (push, Daf) – “Push!” (rare, cf. 2 Kings 4:27). 

הא (this, Ha) – “This” (Genesis 27:21). 

הב (give, Hav) – “Give!” (Job 6:22). 

הו (woe, Hoy) – “Woe!” (rare, cf. Isaiah 5:8). 

הז (this, Haz) – “This” (Genesis 24:65). 

הי (be, Hi) – “Be!” (rare, cf. Isaiah 16:4). 

הך (strike, Hach) – “Strike!” (Isaiah 32:9). 

הם (they, Hem) – “They” (Genesis 6:4). 

הס (be silent, Has) – “Be silent!” (Amos 6:10). 

הר (mountain, Har) – “Mountain” (Genesis 22:2). 

וא (and he, Va) – “And he” (Genesis 4:4). 

וב (and in, Uv) – “And in” (Genesis 1:30). 

וג (and nation, Vag) – “And nation” (rare, cf. Genesis 10:5). 

וה (and this, Vah) – “And this” (rare, cf. Genesis 28:17). 

זא (roar, Za) – “Roar!” (rare, cf. Psalm 104:21). 

זה (this, Zeh) – “This” (Genesis 5:1). 

זר (strange, Zar) – “Strange” or “foreign” (Isaiah 28:21). 

חי (live, Chai) – “Live!” (Genesis 43:8). 

חל (profane, Chal) – “Profane!” (Ezekiel 22:26). 

חם (hot, Cham) – “Hot” (1 Samuel 21:7). 

חן (grace, Chen) – “Grace” (Proverbs 22:11). 

חס (take refuge, Chas) – “Take refuge!” (Psalm 2:12). 

חף (innocent, Chaf) – “Innocent” (rare, cf. Job 9:23). 

חש (be silent, Chash) – “Be silent!” (Ecclesiastes 3:7). 

טה (pure, Tah) – “Pure!” (rare, cf. Psalm 51:9). 

יא (he will, Ya) – “He will” (rare, cf. Genesis 16:12). 

יב (he will bring, Yav) – “He will bring” (rare, cf. Genesis 43:14). 

יח (hope, Yach) – “Hope” (rare, cf. Job 11:18). 

כי (for, Ki) – “For” or “that” (Genesis 1:4). 

יכ (he will establish, Yach) – “He will establish” (rare, cf. Isaiah 26:12). 

ךה (your, Kah) – “Your” (rare, cf. Deuteronomy 4:3). 

לא (not, Lo) – “Not” (Genesis 2:17). 

לב (heart, Lev) – “Heart” (Genesis 6:5). 

לג (mock, Lag) – “Mock!” (rare, cf. 2 Kings 19:21). 

לך (go, Lech) – “Go!” (Genesis 12:1). 

מא (from, Mi) – “From” (Genesis 2:6). 

מב (from him, Miv) – “From him” (rare, cf. Numbers 5:13). 

מג (melt, Mag) – “Melt!” (rare, cf. Psalm 58:8). 

מה (what, Mah) – “What” (Genesis 3:13). 

מח (wipe, Mach) – “Wipe!” (Nehemiah 13:22). 

מי (who, Mi) – “Who” (Genesis 3:11). 

מק (rot, Mak) – “Rot!” (rare, cf. Isaiah 5:24). 

מש (touch, Mash) – “Touch!” (Genesis 3:3). 

נא (please, Na) – “Please” (Genesis 12:13). 

נב (prophet, Nav) – “Prophet” (rare, cf. 1 Kings 20:35). 

נג (play, Nag) – “Play!” (1 Samuel 16:17). 

נח (rest, Nach) – “Rest!” (Isaiah 11:10). 

נר (lamp, Ner) – “Lamp” (Genesis 15:17). 

סא (measure, Sa) – “Measure” (unit, Ezekiel 45:11). 

סב (surround, Sav) – “Surround!” (Psalm 32:7). 

סה (storm, Sah) – “Storm!” (rare, cf. Psalm 107:29). 

סח (sweep, Sach) – “Sweep!” (rare, cf. Isaiah 28:17). 

סר (turn, Sar) – “Turn” or “prince” (Hosea 7:5). 

פא (adorn, Pa) – “Adorn!” (rare, cf. Jeremiah 4:30). 

פב (ornament, Pav) – “Ornament” (rare, cf. Exodus 33:4). 

פה (here, Peh) – “Here” or “mouth” (Genesis 4:11). 

פח (snare, Pach) – “Snare” (Psalm 91:3). 

צא (go out, Tze) – “Go out!” (Genesis 8:16). 

צב (turtle, Tzev) – “Turtle” (turtledove, Leviticus 1:14). 

צו (command, Tzu) – “Command!” (Leviticus 6:2). 

קא (spit, Ka) – “Spit!” (rare, cf. Numbers 12:14). 

קב (measure, Kav) – “Measure” (2 Kings 7:1). 

קח (take, Kach) – “Take!” (Genesis 12:19). 

קם (arise, Kam) – “Arise!” (Genesis 19:15). 

קש (stubble, Kash) – “Stubble” (Exodus 5:12). 

רא (see, Ra) – “See!” (Genesis 27:27). 

רב (many, Rav) – “Many” or “great” (Genesis 13:6). 

רג (moment, Reg) – “Moment” (rare, cf. Jeremiah 18:7). 

רה (evil, Rah) – “Evil” (rare, cf. Jeremiah 2:19). 

רז (secret, Raz) – “Secret” (Daniel 2:18, Aramaic). 

רע (evil, Ra‘) – “Evil” (Genesis 2:9). 

רס (shatter, Ras) – “Shatter!” (rare, cf. Psalm 2:9). 

רק (only, Rak) – “Only” (Genesis 6:5). 

שב (return, Shav) – “Return!” (Isaiah 44:22). 

שא (lift, Sa) – “Lift!” (Psalm 134:2). 

שו (worthless, Sho) – “Worthless” (rare, cf. Jeremiah 2:5). 

שח (bow, Shach) – “Bow!” (Genesis 37:10). 

שק (sack, Sak) – “Sack” (Genesis 42:25). 

שם (name, Shem) – “Name” or “there” (Genesis 2:11). 

שת (foundation, Shet) – “Seth” or “two” (Genesis 5:3). 

תא (cell, Ta) – “Cell” or “chamber” (rare, cf. Genesis 6:14). 

תב (return, Tav) – “Return!” (rare, cf. Jeremiah 15:19). 

תש (weaken, Tash) – “Weaken!” (rare, cf. Isaiah 66:12).

It tells others are too rare or non-existant, you may find some of those in one of the two links above the list, or you may ask it yourself. Either way it is the best way to start learning the hebrew.
Yet here, the previous level:

Single-Letter Prefixes (Standalone Words)
These are the 12 letters previously identified with standalone meanings, all functioning as prefixes or particles:
ב (in, B) – Preposition “in,” “at,” or “by” (Genesis 1:1, b’reishit). 

ה (the, H) – Definite article “the” or “behold!” (Genesis 15:12, hinneh). 

ו (and, V) – Conjunction “and” (Genesis 1:1, u-v’et). 

ז (this, Z) – Demonstrative “this” (rare, Genesis 24:65, zeh variant). 

י (he, Y) – Pronoun “he” or divine name part (Psalm 68:5); verb prefix (e.g., יִזַּח, yizzach). 

כ (like, K) – Preposition “like” or “as” (Genesis 1:26, k’dmutenu). 

ך (your, Kh) – Possessive “your” (rare, Deuteronomy 4:3, kha). 

ל (to, L) – Preposition “to” or “for” (Genesis 12:1, l’artz’kha). 

מ (from, M) – Preposition “from” or “what” (Genesis 2:6, min-ha’aretz). 

נ (please, N) – Particle “please” (Genesis 12:13, na). 

פ (here, P) – Adverb “here” (Genesis 19:12, poh). 

ש (who, Sh) – Interrogative “who” (rare, Isaiah 6:8, mi-sh’lachani).

Two-Letter Prefixes (Standalone Words)
These are common two-letter prepositions or particles that function as standalone words, primarily from rabbinic/modern Hebrew, as biblical Hebrew rarely uses two-letter prefixes. I’ve checked for common forms and excluded non-prefix words (e.g., אב, כל).
של (of, Shel) – Preposition “of,” “belonging to,” or “for” (Mishnaic/modern Hebrew, e.g., sefer shel Moshe; rare in biblical Hebrew, cf. Song of Songs 1:6). 

מן (from, Min) – Preposition “from” (biblical, e.g., Exodus 12:4, min-ha’bayit; variant of מ). 

כש (when, Ka’asher) – Conjunction “when” or “as” (rabbinic/modern, e.g., ka’asher higati, “when I arrived”; biblical uses fuller כאשר, Deuteronomy 1:21). 

על (on, Al) – Preposition “on,” “upon,” or “about” (Genesis 1:2, ‘al-p’nei). 

עם (with, Im) – Preposition “with” (Genesis 5:22, ‘im-Elohim). 

אל (to, El) – Preposition “to” or “toward” (Genesis 14:18; also “God” as a noun). 

את (with, Et) – Preposition “with” (Genesis 4:1, et-Kayin; also direct object marker). 

עד (until, Ad) – Preposition “until” or “up to” (Genesis 3:19, ‘ad).

I challenged the
מ (from, M) – Preposition “from” or “what” (Genesis 2:6, min-ha’aretz) line,
and it agreed and delivered a better line:
Corrected Entry: מ (from, Mi) – Preposition “from” (e.g., mi-yisrael, Numbers 1:3) or interrogative “what” (rare, e.g., mah in Exodus 4:2, “what is it?”). The letter מ (mem) is vocalized as Mi when used as a prefix or standalone word.
so take it all with a grain of salt, but it is oh so close.
so I worked with it some more, and it delivered a better dictionarette:

Single-Letter Prefixes (Standalone Words)

ב (in, Be) – Preposition “in,” “at,” or “by.” 
Vocalized Forms: Be (בְּ, sheva). 
Example: בְּרֵאשִׁית (Genesis 1:1, B’reishit, “in the beginning”).

ה (the, Ha, He) – Definite article “the” or interjection “behold!” 
Vocalized Forms: Ha (הַ, patah), He (הֵ, tzere, rare for “behold”). 
Example: הַשָּׁמַיִם (Genesis 1:1, Ha-shamayim, “the heavens”).

ו (and, Ve, Va, U, O) – Conjunction “and.” 
Vocalized Forms: Ve (וְ, sheva), Va (וָ, kamatz), U (וּ, shuruk), O (וֹ, holam). 
Example: וְאֵת (Genesis 1:1, V’et, “and the”).
it still not exactly precise, that example is confusing, so I asked for clarification, and here it is:
אֵת (Et): A particle, not meaning “the” (which is ה, Ha). את is primarily a direct object marker, used to introduce definite direct objects in Hebrew sentences, but it can also mean “with” as a preposition in some contexts.

ז (this, Ze) – Demonstrative “this” (rare). 
Vocalized Forms: Ze (זֶ, segol). 
Example: זֹאת (Genesis 24:65, Zot, “this,” related to ze).

י (he, Y) – Pronoun “he” or divine name part; verb prefix. 
Vocalized Forms: Y (יְ, sheva, as prefix in יִזַּח, yizzach). 
Example: יְהוָה (Psalm 68:5, Yhwh, “YHWH,” divine name).

כ (like, Ka, Kha) – Preposition “like” or “as.” 
Vocalized Forms: Ka (כְּ, sheva), Kha (כָ, kamatz, spirantized). 
Example: כְּדְמוּתֵנוּ (Genesis 1:26, K’dmutenu, “like our image”).

ך (your, Kha) – Possessive “your” (singular, final form). 
Vocalized Forms: Kha (ךָ, kamatz). 
Example: לְךָ (Genesis 12:1, L’kha, “to you,” with ך).

ל (to, Le, La) – Preposition “to” or “for.” 
Vocalized Forms: Le (לְ, sheva), La (לָ, kamatz). 
Example: לְאַרְצְךָ (Genesis 12:1, L’artz’kha, “to your land”).

מ (from, Mi, Ma) – Preposition “from” or “what.” 
Vocalized Forms: Mi (מִ, hiriq), Ma (מָ, kamatz, for “what”). 
Example: מִיִּשְׂרָאֵל (Numbers 1:3, Mi-yisrael, “from Israel”).

נ (please, Na) – Particle “please.” 
Vocalized Forms: Na (נָא, kamatz). 
Example: נָא הַזֹּאת (Genesis 12:13, Na hazot, “please, this”).

פ (here, Po) – Adverb “here.” 
Vocalized Forms: Po (פֹּה, holam). 
Example: פֹּה (Genesis 19:12, Poh, “here”).

ש (who, Sh) – Interrogative “who” (rare). 
Vocalized Forms: Sh (שְׁ, sheva, as in mi-sh’lachani). 
Example: מִי־שְׁלָחֲךָ (Isaiah 6:8, Mi-sh’lachakha, “who will go”).


Two-Letter Prefixes (Standalone Words)

של (of, Shel) – Preposition “of,” “belonging to,” or “for.” 
Vocalized Forms: Shel (שֶׁל, segol). 
Example: סֵפֶר שֶׁל משֶׁה (Mishnaic, Sefer shel Moshe, “the book of Moses”).

מן (from, Min) – Preposition “from.” 
Vocalized Forms: Min (מִן, hiriq). 
Example: מִן־הָאָרֶץ (Genesis 2:6, Min-ha’aretz, “from the earth”).

כש (when, Ka’asher) – Conjunction “when” or “as.” 
Vocalized Forms: Ka’asher (כַּאֲשֶׁר, patah-segol). 
Example: כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוָּה (Deuteronomy 1:21, Ka’asher tzivah, “as he commanded”).

על (on, Al) – Preposition “on,” “upon,” or “about.” 
Vocalized Forms: Al (עַל, patah). 
Example: עַל־פְּנֵי (Genesis 1:2, ‘Al-p’nei, “upon the face”).

עם (with, Im) – Preposition “with.” 
Vocalized Forms: Im (עִם, hiriq). 
Example: עִם־אֱלֹהִים (Genesis 5:22, ‘Im-Elohim, “with God”).

אל (to, El) – Preposition “to” or “toward”; also “God.” 
Vocalized Forms: El (אֶל, segol). 
Example: אֶל־הָאָרֶץ (Genesis 14:18, El-ha’aretz, “to the land”).

את (with, Et) – Preposition “with”; also direct object marker. 
Vocalized Forms: Et (אֶת, segol). 
Example: אֶת־קַיִן (Genesis 4:1, Et-Kayin, “with Cain”).

עד (until, Ad) – Preposition “until” or “up to.” 
Vocalized Forms: Ad (עַד, patah). 
Example: עַד־אֲשֶׁר (Genesis 3:19, ‘Ad-asher, “until”).

so, with that inconsistency I found, I asked it to check it for mistakes by itself, it praised the prompt and gave me this:

Single-Letter: 
ב (in, Be) – בְּרֵאשִׁית (Genesis 1:1). 

ה (the, Ha) – הַשָּׁמַיִם (Genesis 1:1). 

ו (and, Ve, Va, U, O) – וַיֹּאמֶר (Genesis 1:3). 

ז (this, Ze) – זֶה סִינַי (Judges 5:5). 

י (he, Yi) – יְהוָה (Psalm 68:5). 

כ (like, Ke, Kha) – כְּדְמוּתֵנוּ (Genesis 1:26). 

ך (your, Kha) – לְךָ (Genesis 12:1). 

ל (to, Le, La) – לְאַרְצְךָ (Genesis 12:1). 

מ (from, Mi, Ma) – מִיִּשְׂרָאֵל (Numbers 1:3). 

נ (please, Na) – נָא הַזֹּאת (Genesis 12:13). 

פ (here, Po) – פֹּה (Genesis 19:12). 

ש (who, She) – מִי־שְׁלָחֲךָ (Isaiah 6:8).

Two-Letter: 
של (of, Shel) – סֵפֶר שֶׁל משֶׁה (Mishnaic). 

מן (from, Min) – מִן־הָאָרֶץ (Genesis 2:6). 

כש (when, Ka’asher) – כַּאֲשֶׁר צִוָּה (Deuteronomy 1:21). 

על (on, Al) – עַל־פְּנֵי (Genesis 1:2). 

עם (with, Im) – עִם־אֱלֹהִים (Genesis 5:22). 

אל (to, El) – אֶל־הָאָרֶץ (Genesis 14:18). 

את (direct object marker, Et, At) – אֵת הַשָּׁמַיִם (Genesis 1:1). 

עד (until, Ad) – עַד־אֲשֶׁר (Genesis 3:19).

a much deeper analysis of where it was wrong is in the log
I also asked it to check the previous list of the 127 standalone biliteral words, and here it is:

אב (father, Av) – אָבִי, “my father.”

אד (mist, Ed) – אֵד יַעֲלֶה, “mist went up.”

אה (ah, Ah) – אָהּ לָהּ, “ah, to her!”

או (or, O) – אוֹ יוֹם, “or a day.”

אז (then, Az) – אָז יָשִׁיר, “then he began.”

אי (where, Ay) – אַיֵּה הֵם, “where are they?”

אל (to, God, El) – אֶל־הָאָרֶץ, “to the land.”

אם (if, mother, Im, Em) – אִם־תַּעֲשֶׂה, “if you do.”

אן (whither, An) – אָן אֵלֵךְ, “whither shall I go?” [Rare]

אס (gather, As) – אָסְפוּ, “gather!” [Rare]

אף (anger, also, Af) – אַף תָּמִיד, “also always.”

אץ (hasten, Etz) – אֵץ לְהוֹשִׁיעַ, “hasten to save!” [Rare]

אק (cry out, Ak) – אָק צָעַקְתִּי, “I cry out!” [Rare]

אר (light, Or) – אוֹר וָחֹשֶׁךְ, “light and darkness.” [Rare]

אש (fire, Esh) – אֵשׁ לֹהֵט, “burning fire.”

את (direct object marker, with, Et, At) – אֵת הַשָּׁמַיִם, “[the object] the heavens.”
   [Note: With וְ, as וְאֵת, means “and [the object],” not “and the” (Genesis 1:1)]
here וְ looks like ן, but it's ו, which raises the same old question of ν~n

בא (he came, Ba) – בָּא אֶל־הָעִיר, “he came to the city.”

בד (linen, alone, Bad) – בַּדֵּי הַמִּזְבֵּחַ, “linen of the altar.”

בה (in her, Bah) – בָּהּ תִּשְׁתַּחֲוֶה, “in her you shall bow.”

בו (in him, Bo) – בּוֹ תִּבְטְחוּ, “in him you shall trust.”

בי (in me, Bi) – בִּי אֵין, “in me there is none.”

בל (not, Bal) – בַּל־יִרְאֶה, “not seen.” [Rare]

בם (in them, Bam) – בָּם נִשְׁבְּעוּ, “in them they swore.”

בן (son, Ben) – בֵּן לָהּ, “son to her.”

בס (tread, Bas) – בַּס דֶּרֶךְ, “tread the way!” [Rare]

בף (anger, Baf, Bef) – בֶּף, “anger.” [Rare, Mishnaic]

בץ (plunder, Betz) – בֵּץ עִיר, “plunder the city!” [Rare]

בק (seek, Bak) – בַּק אֱמֶת, “seek truth!” [Rare]

בר (grain, pure, Bar) – בַּר לֵבָב, “pure heart.”

בש (shame, Bosh) – בֹּשׁ וּכְלִמָּה, “shame and disgrace.”

בת (daughter, Bat) – בַּת־לָהּ, “daughter to her.”

גב (back, Gav) – גַּב הַכְּרֵתִי, “back of the Philistine.”

גד (fortune, Gad) – גָּד, “fortune.”

גה (shine, Gah) – גָּה אֹרְךָ, “shine, your light!” [Rare]

גו (nation, Go) – גּוֹיִם, “nations.” [Rare]

גז (shear, Gaz) – גַּז צֹאן, “shear the flock.”

גל (heap, wave, Gal) – גַּל אֶבֶן, “heap of stone.”

גם (also, Gam) – גַּם־זֹאת, “also this.”

גן (garden, Gan) – גַּן־עֵדֶן, “Garden of Eden.”

גר (sojourn, Ger) – גֵּר בָּאָרֶץ, “sojourn in the land.”

דא (soar, Da) – דָּא עַל־כְּנָפַיִם, “soar on wings!” [Rare]

דב (bear, Dov) – דֹּב שֹׁכֵן, “bear dwelling.”

דג (fish, Dag) – דָּג גָּדוֹל, “great fish.”

דד (breast, Ded) – דַּדֵּי שָׁדַיִם, “breasts of bosoms.”

דף (push, Daf) – דַּף אֶת־הַדֶּלֶת, “push the door!” [Rare]

הא (this, Ha) – הָא אִישׁ, “this man.”

הב (give, Hav) – הַב לִי, “give to me.”

הו (woe, Hoy) – הוֹי אֲרִיאֵל, “woe, Ariel!”

הז (this, Haz) – הַזֹּאת הָאָרֶץ, “this land.”

הי (be, Hi) – הִי מִשְׁפָּט, “be a judgment!” [Rare]

הך (strike, Hach) – הַךְ אֶת־הָאוֹיֵב, “strike the enemy!”

הם (they, Hem) – הֵם הָאֲנָשִׁים, “they are the men.”

הס (be silent, Has) – הַס לֵאלֹהִים, “be silent to God!”

הר (mountain, Har) – הַר הַזֹּאת, “this mountain.”

וא (and he, Va) – וָאֶרְאֶה, “and I saw.”

וב (and in, Uv) – וּבְכָל־חַיָּה, “and in every living thing.”

וג (and nation, Vag) – וָגוֹיִם, “and nations.” [Rare]

וה (and this, Vah) – וָהַזֹּאת, “and this.” [Rare]

זא (roar, Za) – זָא כְּפִירִים, “roar, young lions!” [Rare]

זה (this, Zeh) – זֶה סֵפֶר, “this is the book.”

זר (strange, Zar) – זָר וְנוֹכְרִי, “strange and foreign.”

חי (live, Chai) – חַי אֲנִי, “I live!”

חל (profane, Chal) – חַל קֹדֶשׁ, “profane the holy!”

חם (hot, Cham) – חַם הַיּוֹם, “hot of the day.”

חן (grace, Chen) – חֵן בְּעֵינָיו, “grace in his eyes.”

חס (take refuge, Chas) – חַס בֵּאלֹהִים, “take refuge in God!”

חף (innocent, Chaf) – חַף מֵחֵטְא, “innocent from sin.” [Rare]

חש (be silent, Chash) – חַשׁ לְדַבֵּר, “be silent to speak!”

טה (pure, Tah) – טָה לֵבָבִי, “pure my heart!” [Rare]

יא (he will, Ya) – יָא יִהְיֶה, “he will be.” [Rare]

יב (he will bring, Yav) – יָב אֶת־הַזֹּאת, “he will bring this.” [Rare]

יח (hope, Yach) – יָח לְאֵל, “hope to God.” [Rare]

כי (for, Ki) – כִּי טוֹב, “for it is good.”

יכ (he will establish, Yach) – יָךְ מִשְׁפָּט, “he will establish judgment.” [Rare]

ךה (your, Kha) – לְךָה אֵל, “to your God.” [Rare]

לא (not, Lo) – לֹא תֹאכַל, “you shall not eat.”

לב (heart, Lev) – לֵב רָע, “evil heart.”

לג (mock, Lag) – לַג לָהּ, “mock her!” [Rare]

לך (go, Lech) – לֵךְ לְךָ, “go for yourself!”

מא (from, Mi) – מִאֵין, “from nothing.”

מב (from him, Miv) – מִבֵּיתוֹ, “from his house.” [Rare]

מג (melt, Mag) – מַג כְּשֶׁלֶג, “melt like snow!” [Rare]

מה (what, Mah) – מָה־זֹּאת, “what is this?”

מח (wipe, Mach) – מַח חֵטְא, “wipe sin!”

מי (who, Mi) – מִי־זֶה, “who is this?”

מק (rot, Mak) – מַק עֵץ, “rot, wood!” [Rare]

מש (touch, Mash) – מַשׁ בָּעֵץ, “touch the tree!”

נא (please, Na) – נָא אָמְרִי, “please say.”

נב (prophet, Nav) – נָבִיא, “prophet.” [Rare]

נג (play, Nag) – נַג בְּכִנּוֹר, “play the lyre!”

נח (rest, Nach) – נַח בְּצֵל, “rest in the shade!”

נר (lamp, Ner) – נֵר אֵשׁ, “lamp of fire.”

סא (measure, Sa) – סָא תָמִיד, “measure continually.” [Rare]

סב (surround, Sav) – סַב אֹתִי, “surround me!”

סה (storm, Sah) – סָה בַּיָּם, “storm in the sea.” [Rare]

סח (sweep, Sach) – סַח חֵטְא, “sweep sin!” [Rare]

סר (turn, prince, Sar) – סַר הַמַּחֲנֶה, “prince of the camp.”

פא (adorn, Pa) – פָּא בְּזָהָב, “adorn with gold!” [Rare]

פב (ornament, Pav) – פָּב עַל־צַוָּאר, “ornament on the neck.” [Rare]

פה (here, mouth, Peh) – פֶּה הָאָרֶץ, “mouth of the earth.”

פח (snare, Pach) – פַּח לְנֶפֶשׁ, “snare for the soul.”

צא (go out, Tze) – צֵא מִן־הַתֵּבָה, “go out from the ark!”

צב (turtle, Tzev, Tzav) – צֵב וְתוֹר, “turtle and dove.”

צו (command, Tzu) – צוּ אֶת־הַכֹּהֲנִים, “command the priests!”

קא (spit, Ka) – קָא בְּפָנָיו, “spit in his face!” [Rare]

קב (measure, Kav) – קַב שְׂעֹרִים, “measure of barley.”

קח (take, Kach) – קַח אֶת־אִשְׁתֶּךָ, “take your wife!”

קם (arise, Kam) – קָם מִן־הַשֵּׁנָה, “arise from sleep!”

קש (stubble, Kash) – קַשׁ לָאֵשׁ, “stubble for fire.”

רא (see, Ra) – רָא אֶת־הַזֹּאת, “see this!”

רב (many, Rav) – רַב עָשִׁיר, “many riches.”

רג (moment, Reg) – רֶגַע זֹאת, “this moment.” [Rare]

רה (evil, Rah) – רָה בְּעֵינָיו, “evil in his eyes.” [Rare]

רז (secret, Raz) – רָז דָּא, “this secret.” [Aramaic]

רע (evil, Ra‘) – רַע וְטוֹב, “evil and good.”

רס (shatter, Ras) – רַס כְּלִי, “shatter the vessel!” [Rare]

רק (only, Rak) – רַק הַדָּבָר, “only the thing.”

שב (return, Shav) – שַׁב אֶל־אֵל, “return to God!”

שא (lift, Sa) – שָׂא יָדֶיךָ, “lift your hands!”

שו (worthless, Sho) – שׁוֹא לֵאלֹהִים, “worthless to God.” [Rare]

שח (bow, Shach) – שַׁח לְאָבִיו, “bow to his father!”

שק (sack, Sak) – שַׂק תַּבְנִית, “sack of grain.”

שם (name, there, Shem) – שֵׁם הַנָּהָר, “name of the river.”

שת (Seth, Shet) – שֵׁת, “Seth.”

תא (cell, Ta) – תָּאֵי הַתֵּבָה, “cells of the ark.” [Rare]

תב (return, Tav) – תָּב אֶל־אֵל, “return to God!” [Rare]

תש (weaken, Tash) – תַּשׁ נַפְשִׁי, “weaken my soul!” [Rare]

שת (Seth, Shet) – שֵׁת, “Seth.”  is suddenly missing "foundation" and "two"
so it corrected it so-so. Trust, but verify. The technology is rather trust-worthy already.



diving ~ divine ~ deeping going deep


Isn't arabic a modern form of aramaic? b and m can mutate into one another, I think I saw it somewhere. we~мы, and wolf~волк, and


Случайно даже кубик-рубик не собрать (про то как обезьяна может войну и мир написать)
(шанс на то, что обезьяна будет такое сложное поведение проявлять нулевые, а может это разговор о бесконечно-малых)



"Do you want to kill yourself?", I ask myself. And the answer is no.
. amnd , are like m and n. n and m. like т(т) and m(m)




четвертование это про смерть. может оттого ши много мечей. 4 меча. щ?



к в слове какой
т в слове такой

к фор э куэсчн марк
т ис фор дот.


do т (time-out sign (how do you think antient is it. It's literally т))
(делай остановку, давай труп, "die, tott(труп)", "стой, тпру", дай тут, дай передохнуть, давай тут)

тут как в топос (topos, 𓏏[t])

и тогда в где г это та же к от как, кто. как is qq, doublt k.
а значит звонкие и глухие одно лицо.
двойные буквы б г д они же п к т. и р означает повтор может быть (комментарий, принятый за часть текста? я выдумываю. или вижу? или при помощи видений выдумываю? вижумываю)

𓎡 [k] is graphically opposite to 𓏏 (but in other writing systems they're not)
but in russian кем и тем это явно антонимирует. Словно русские использовали египетское письмо и эти знаки от русских слов. И это же не первый раз, когда я ловлю египетский на русских флексиях: множественное число
𓏐 which follows 𓏏 𓎡
𓏐         X2    U+133D0       
and
𓏑       X3    U+133D1
are batter in a jar (it depicts that it can rise and run)
and batter outside of jar (probably was used for plasticin with some additional hieroglyph)

𓎡         V31    U+133A1    basket-with-handle(hieroglyph)         k    (uniliteral)
𓎡 словно вопрошает (asking for donation, begging, asKing (просит как король?))



куда туда
где здесь (если г(g) есть звонкая фрома ку(q), то з есть звонкая фрома от ту)

сюда ещё есть. ту и сю пространство отделяют

ку в куда словно объединяет сю и ту. всю вообще?

кем сим тем (этим=сим (т от открытого слога, с от закрытого? отRU=сRU(one of meaning (the other is with)) сей=со Iй (в русском тысячелетней давности "и" означало "его")))

я мы все (в-се ~ вообще)

 Я/I me мы ты/thee те/they

и for he (И~H~N (ий, he, он)) pretty much links the ring:

ий~he(what about им("to them" and "by him") и их?)~I
you [ya] противопоставлено я [I]

ий и йа  (he & I)
he & ich  (he & I)
ай & йа (это другое (I&І))

io ~ они? (I & they)
ИО ~ ON (I & he)
ON ~ ИО (he & I(io))

but no, uo~on (interesting, that pairs keep the symmetry even changing their forms dramatically)
on~uo could be n o in the alphabet

but no, иo~on is more natural: 1st person goes first.
            ꙗ~ей  (она полная форма? у мужиков краткие формы, выкрики, некрасивые, грубые)

я ~ ꙗ ~ io

            ꙗ~I[ʌɪ]

могли быть суффиксы им и ой отражением слов он и она? или ой от ою? две губных, но у женщины эфемерней?



Thinking of how c is for circle, and the letter itself looks like circile.
cic//
circle = cR & cL
Ɔ & C?
the position of r and L tells that it was read from the right side. CƆ
Left оставленый порядок чтения, но мы по нему читаем.
Right is correct, and only jews and arabs write that way. Chinks also wrote from right to left.
And chinese texts are like ours, if you rotate them 90°. I had a friend writing with the left hand, he rotated notebook 90°, which surprised me, but chinese configuration perfect for left-handed.

A=F×S
In physics, A=F×S is a simplified representation of work done by a force. It means the work (A) is equal to the force (F) multiplied by the distance (S) over which the force is applied. This formula is used to calculate the work done on an object when a force acts on it and the object moves a certain distance.
How ancient are these formulas? Were they born before or after alphabets? Do such formulas exist in ancient egyptian texts?

Because that sequence is alphabetic (vowel, labial, lingual)
And the next one I thought of is also too.

E=M×c²

Для определения расхода электроэнергии используют формулу E = Pt , где P — электрическая мощность в киловаттах, а t — время в часах. 1 кВт ⋅ ч = 1000 Вт ⋅ 3600 с = 3 600000 Вт ⋅ с = 3 600 000 Дж = 3,6 МДж .


even E=(Mv²)/2 looks so миу, so maybe it's just me seeing things?
E=mgh (m is labial as f, gh are literally what goes after that labial.
even E(n is p, потенциальная=potential, that's the missing link, and then goes k (as q and h as another velar turning into coronal)

And even the most modern formulas for energy were extremely alphabetic:

EFHC as EFGH, 8mc2 as imkn 3 for ɔ because π is great after m, but n breaks the similarity, unless π is r (for р is r in russian and greek) and thus n is of the mcpn [mkrn? and I want l for lune in the crone]

and these too:

I see the second line in E=hv (E=vh)
I see E = gh  and λ on the lower line.
Did those who invented them wanted them to be the basics, the bc's, the азы. подсознательно?
Но только энергия такая, может потому что строка так начинается, может мы всегда это чувствовали, мне лишь удалось вытащить это на поверхность.


Okay, that was weird. Waht about formulas of A?
A is of arbeiten, that's how russian physics call work unit:

A=F×S and
W = F ⋅ d
W is the only ever vowel of them (in news and views)

At this level I felt like it's way off, so let's collect some random physical formulas to see if there's tendency to make them in alphabetic order. Could be a natural tendency in encyclopedists.
 
(mirror)


















Maybe I am biased, but I see some strong alphabetic tendency in these random physical formulas.
s/t alone is wow.

mc like mem and samekh and like mem shin, either sequence is alphabetic.

If I have vowel in the leftmost side of the formula already, wouldn't it be natural to have lingual and labial elements? And the way I switched hv as if it was nothing, not a meme, tells me that I'm pulling it. Am I? It is verifiable: how much is the tendency to have elements named with initial vowels? Probably not much, since the other side is also of the same set of letters. But then we may know formulas one way and not the other.

Speaking of formulas, in chemistry which formulas do I know? H₂O is ho for water is female.
Explicitly non-alphabetic. But it has something else instead. Is it why chemists and physicists do not come along? Because they are different schools of superpowers? Or are they divided, because they would be unstoppable if they united?

Well, start here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_chemical_formulae
(they go in alphabetic order, so some alphabetic order is always present, maybe it creates the alphabetic tendency I earlier speculated, but chemical formulas are all over the place.


I'll leave this chapter here to show you how wild I allow myself to be.

R=U/I
U=RI
volt amper ohm.. is amper ohm-per-volt?
I = U/R so no, the other way around. Or what if it's "per Ohm" in some other grammar?


It is some teminologic poetry. Those who made them known all over the world were some poets.

To name a force of nature.

volt is of volatile?

(no human mind can unweave this ball of yarn, so multifaceted it is)
but then there's an advice not to tell "I can't do it.", tell "How can I do it?"
I can delegate it to artificial intellect.
artual intellect (as actual intellect, but of arms, art, thus m and t are suffixes.  are (то что есть) у кого что есть то и руки. обычно руками, но можно и головой помочь, ногой мнут глину тоже может быть. Но с изобретением три-дэ принтеров, не отомрёт ли этот жанр?


БЮже писательство, отъебись. Мне надо строить саркофаг хотя бы.


Но как отъебёшься, когда тут такое:

Carmenta's alphabet:
(never found, I speculate on the basis of my previous thing)

ГFE
aбев(don't EВ reflect each other a~б~д, е~в~je(ж)   did they only know plosives and fricatives?

ΙΛΜ

Λ~Г
М~F
E~I?



(I decided to publish it academically also)
a version for a separate article:
 ☯-like elements of latin alphabet.
surprisingly many letters can be seen as one or another fish
aбgде pqьǝ    or    aбgд еpqьǝ    (pq ~ ft (ת without dot sounds as s))
s and г look like the central line of ࿊, and as such can be seen N, И, Z
N reminds Z also in that it ends the voiced half. Could Z be S? Isn't it in german?
German S is [z] like wtf.


i
e
a
o
u

by placing I at the first place we get gradually descending scale.
Shape of E makes me suspect a lost vowel between I and E, but maybe i is both 1 and 2? . & -
. & - look much more like 0 and 1
i, い and イ are all two strokes. It's simple for japanese, that's their second vowel. They also start at A.
But not in IrOhA, but those are not the O and the A, let's check the text:

いろはにほへと
ちりぬるを
わかよたれそ
つねならむ
うゐのおく やま
けふこえて
あさきゆめみし
ゑひもせす

iuoea? though I wouldn't know if it was some japanese musical format, but I think their musical notation is not of vowels, but like our do re mi fa sol ti (in russian it is si because it sounds as ri?

do re mi fa sol ti
d   r   m  f   s    t
 Dr.   Mefi_s__to

before that it was
ut re mi fa sol ti
u  R  m   f   s   t
и A  M  F  S  T

I know the official version, but facts are facts, some coincidences are tremendous
(you may argue agains R, but it is vowel in india, bharat are you kiddin me, парашно звучит.

An there's no questions about the labial natura of M&F and lingual natura of S&T
natura it is now in my english language.

Is a read? They're often swallowed, it doesn't make them legitimately(?) silent

I'm still mistaking legitimate to legitible legibility.. english is not my language, why do I even bother!

AI tells me my language's alright, and since it can make sense of it, so others should


Did the medieval musicians substituted ur-mf-slt.. I just noticed I lost la earlier, but it is also lingual.

Could it be U-MF-SLT? It could be even shorter than that in pentatonic scale: U-MF-ST(or SL, LT, LS)

Do Re Mi Fa Sol La Ti
in the modern representation it just have labial island, swallowed by the lingual ocean. C D E F G A B

i
e
a
o
u

has the ☯ claster in the centre, with heppy e standing above hurtlike a. But then maybe they wanted to place a (arba, arbeiten, aggraveiten) up front, so that the happiness comes after the hardness, not the other way around. So, let's appreciate
eye I or A (or eYe?) [ai]
ear [ia]    oh the magic of English

o is nose  (oh! what a pleasant surprise. уважительно о!)
фу зажат нос?

were these the  three vowels?

Пять гласных как пять органов чувств. v как уста? moUth~my_уста?
feel for ee the i?
Были
I    eye
E    ear
A    aщущение
O    нОс (нас ~ us)
U    taste вкУс, кУс, по Усам текло, в рот не попало, это про алкоголь говоришь тому кто видел как ты пил.

A   Aye
E    Ear           or was ear I, while e is for taste[tejst]
I     Itch? skIn
O   nOse
U  moUth

in russian:

глАзА
?
Очи
Уши

это перебор и такая хуйня.               


I    M
𐎅 
a
o        Leave it, I say. Too speculative at this point. too many assumptions
u                                  (and thus mistakes are inevitable and harder to detect)



and let's compare it not to the latin,  but to the greek
(since Η amongst vowels is a greek thing)

Α Β Γ Δ
Ε Ϝ Η Θ
Ι Μ Κ Ν
Ο Π Τ      could these be the Carmenta's 15? Could the game of 15 be that ancient?
I jumped onto the fact that greek doesn't have Q, but at the same extent it doesn't have F,
and just as I pulled out Ϝϝ, I could have pulled out Ϙϙ

г п т
ɪ n m    how are these two clasters are so similar? гпт is not claster. graphically it is. not positionally.
L m n     in case you prefer it like this
Г п т    

L for left
r for right?
L is I in that context. Is it for sword?
r is O in that context, Is it for shield? ro. ⵔ. ρ.
г for гарда, guard
по левую руку лекарь, по правую руку охрана? (вот к чему такие speculations?)


Я придумал новую книжку:
сборник научных гипотез

АлфаВиТ (название книги такое)
(А, В и Т)

t is how the alphabet used to end, how hebrew alphabet ends. What were the chances? 2/22 (because z would satisfy me too. 3/22 (because o would intrigue me either) or even 4/22, because n sometimes itches me as if end is eN'ed.

but russians have another word for it:
(alphabet russians know as alfavit, even though technically it is alfavita (names of the greek letters))

АЗ БУ КА  (the old russian name of it)
And aZ is reversed Ka (because both are lingual, and az is reversed in comparison to the other two)
Thus it was Bu Ka-aZ
каз как в рассказ? буказ~указ? books!

if bu and ka were exhales, az would make perfect inhaling sound. semantic side of it demands it.

разумеет ~ разум умеет, разум имеет. разум еет. разум есть (est (съедает место пустое собою?))
(занимает место)

Initial A in every alphabet is a powerful jewish psy-op: all those alphabets are under abrahamic religions. But japanese have initial A in both hiragana and katakana. Or were they invented under russian influence? Under european influence was the sentence. Rᚢssians would be a generic similar to old-russian "немцы" собирательно для европейцев. Все нэйшн-стэйтс разобрали названия, а германия была необъединена, потому немцы им и осталось в русском языке.
(South was nation-states long before north: Roman Empire, Greek Civilization, of those we know)
But was there time in which europeans only knew the jewish history?

Renaissance is of that, digging the old statues out. Was it after they expulled jews? Jews are some how still around, and mightier than ever. Did we lose? Does it mean we shouldn't fight? Surrender.

The fight now is addressing the jews calling to their senses. To their sence of righteousness, but they're jews and their culture may dicate different code of cunduct. I still do not approve of bloody fight, I wish the multinational world, where every nation has its home. So basically I advocate for sending all jews to Israel, all russians to Russia, all americans to america too? As if it was not complicated enough before. It's a wish. It's not likely to come true. But then everything is possible with good faith.


A-Fro-Di-Ta, p-ro-s-ti  (это личное)

Arte-Me-Da, I should have never left you, ever.

I loved one Marina, was loved by another Marina, Marina Marina was my thing. I should have never declined her mariage's offer. It is so cool of her. I am such a pussy faggot. But then I would probably not develop this theory.  So let's take the best of both world. Let's quickly make this theory popular. 2033 is too far away (and it seems it takes not 10, but twenty years for something to be developed: There were people who spoke about the pediodicity of elements two decades before Mendeleev.


девять и десять could have de for th, as in thumb.
Thus octal became deciMAL.. was it in mediEVAL period? Classix used IVXLCD and it was already decimal. How sure am I about it?
девять и десядь for thumbs would number fingers as 7 and 8 in indexes, 5 and 6 in middle fingers, 3 and 4 in ring fingers, 1 and 2 are pinkies.

И я ругаю себя "ты глупый человек! чем ты занимаешься? Это хуже поэзии: это вообще никто не понимает (ну, почти. да не почти)" And it feels like right hemisphere is angry: they say emotions are from there, so the consolidating voice is from the rational hemisphere, so I feel, but I am biased by what I read about it.

 ⰀⰁⰂⰃⰄⰅⰆⰇⰈⰉⰊⰋⰌⰍⰎⰏⰐⰑⰒⰓⰔⰕⰖⰗⰘⰙⰚⰛⰜⰝⰞⰟⰠⰡⰢⰣⰤⰥⰦⰧⰨⰩⰪⰫⰬⰭⰮⰰⰱⰲⰳⰴⰵⰶⰷⰸⰹⰺⰻⰼⰽⰾⰿⱀⱁⱂⱃⱄⱅⱆⱇⱈⱉⱊⱋⱌⱍⱎⱏⱐⱑⱒⱓⱔⱕⱖⱗⱘⱙⱚⱛⱜⱝⱞ
Ⰰ колесо? Ⰱ прялка рядом с ним, или над ним, если снизу вверх писали. Ⰱ is definitely ᛓ the ᚠ (батя and father unite that glyph)

ⰂⰃⰄ (see цифровые значения 3 and 5 in the following picture)
Ⰲ&Ⰴ oppose each-other as b and d do, and thus tell me that ⰀⰁ is something else. Дед и Баба.
Ⰲ&Ⰴ (all four balls should look like the small one) are also баба и деда: у бабы шарики это сиськи, а у мужика шарики это яйки.


1 – округлая (болгарская) глаголица; 2 – округлая скоропись; 3 – угловатая (хорватская) глаголица и скоропись; 4 – транскрипция; 5 – цифровые значения букв; 6 – графонимы (названия букв)
болгарская Ⰲ and хорватская Ⰳ look the same, which recall BC.html and хорватская Ⰲ reflects Ⱅ and not Ⰴ, which unicode supports, and that unicode is croatian.

Is russian чиво written as чего, because somebody mistook bulgarian Ⰲ fir croatian Ⰳ?

ⰑⰂⰃⰕ is the best I could find. And their rotation goes clockwise and alphabetic: ovgd, this way alphabetic by the groups. oritiseqyebce,

како такое како (там мужик сидит тужится в болгарской, kh)

R as Ⱃ.. R as Р didn't confuse ya? if it's to пор (пороть? порубить! т.е. и то и по это приставки?)
Р топор в работе
Ⱃ топор у стены.
Топор от слова топ? топ рубануть? Верхушки деревьев подсекали? потому что срубать дерево целиком слишком дохуя работы, а веток нарубать по приколу. Но топор, кажется, лишь оружием был. Срубали ли деревья каменными топорами?

Why would croatians borrow M from greeks? or from romans? m is latin.

p-like n reminds russina n-like p: п(п)

so were p, п, н the same letter? the same thing? прн, прение, парение?
or, which is way more likely, they are initial letters of the same thing with different words in different languages.

I asked Grok of such thing, and it gave me
Russian: рыба (ryba), /r/.
Portuguese: peixe, /p/.
Italian: nasello, /n/, or Nenets: ṅяӈгы, /n/.
and I heard that מ is for water, נ is for fish.
 (In Aramaic and Akkadian nun means fish, and in Arabic, nūn means large fish or whale). The Phoenician letter was also named nūn "fish"


This alternative table of elements reminds me Ogham way too much. But then I know it's nuts, so nah

and I was taught by some table more similar to this one:



дело от слова делюсь?
дело от слова делаюсь
дело от слова делаю
дело от слова делаемо

deed ..is it ancient form of done?
(his deeds are what he has done)
(did~done, they say irregularity of verbs is a colloquial process, but then they also tell that


люби ~ еби (l[j])
liebe ~ l'amour (b~m)

еби ~ бля be?
("бля бу" в значении "знаю" как антоним к "не ебу")

любЯщий
   ебУщий     недостаточная схожесть лю и е меня отчего-то не смущает. Я притягиваю два слова вместе для сличения, для проверки этой гипотезы. Что все слова про любовь когнаты.
love ~ liebe ~ люба 
(b~v)
g~g~д
е~ё
ж~з
и~й
к~л? поелику м~н   (поелику~поколику~поскольку)
and it breaks apart at k (RL would be a great pair though, especially in right-to-left writing system)

The Bulgarian word "непротивоконституционствувателствувайте" (neprotivokonstitutsionstvuvatelstvuvayte, meaning "do not act against the constitution") is often cited as the longest word in Bulgarian, appearing in the 1947 Dimitrov Constitution.


[a]ᚐ ~  ᛇᛈᛉᛅᛆthere was no a in second aet between ᛁ and ᛊ.
[o]ᚑ ~ ᚨᚩᚬᚮ(all [o])  ~ 𐎀[a]?

Aettir are F, H, T, which is somewhat similar to b, h, m of ᚁ, ᚆ, ᚋ (ᚠ~ᛓ; т~m)
ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚲᚷᚹ᛬ ᚺᚾᛁᛃᛇᛈᛉᛊ᛬ ᛏᛒᛖᛗᛚᛜᛞᛟ: elder fuþark (1(?)c.~9c.)
(short-twig)ᚠᚢᚦᚭᚱᚴ᛬ᚽᚿᛁᛆᛌ᛬ᛐᛓᛙᛚᛧ: younger fuþark (8c.~11c.) ᚠᚢᚦᚬᚱᚴ᛬ᚼᚾᛁᛅᛋ᛬ᛏᛒᛘᛚᛦ(long-twig)
ᚠᚢᚦᚮᚱᚴ᛬ᚼᚿᛁᛆᛋ᛬ᛐᛒᛘᛚᛦmedieval fuþark(13~16c)ᚡv ᚤy,v ᚧð ᚰǫ,å ᚵg ᚶng ᛀn ᛀN ᛂe ᛅä ᛍc ᛎz ᛑd ᛔp ᛕp ᛛL


and j which is h is hispanic (jispanic?) j[h]
and it is exactly how [h]ᚼ/ᛡ[j] ring.
ᛡ[j] is told to be in use in anglo-frisian and anglo-saxon, in which instead of ᚼ[h] they used ᚻ[h]
ᚠᚢᚦᚩᚱᚳᚷᚹ ᚻᚾᛁᛄᛇᛈᛉᛋ ᛏᛒᛖᛗᛚᛝᛞᛟ ᚪᚫᚣᛡᛠᛣᛤᚸ  'ᛢᛥ: anglo-frisian (?, the same set as in the next)
ᚠᚢᚦᚩᚱᚳᚷᚹ ᚻᚾᛁᛄᛇᛈᛉᛋ ᛏᛒᛖᛗᛚᛝᛞᛟ ᚪᚫᚣ  ᛠ   ᛡᚸᛣᛢᛥᛤ: later anglo-saxon futhorc (8c.~12c.)
And when ᚼ[h] was in use, they stopped long before that j


Is it where the mutation started? 55 square distorted at the end (a broken piece was placed aside? continued for some reason with other two?
M is just one step below it's column (as in italian and irish (but unlike those two this one is much larger set of letters, so is it like oder futhark being larger than younger futhark. Some sounds were substituted by digraphs, so less letters were needed from there on))

And it's the first time when I saw that there 27 of them here.
But then I grouped them by nine, and looked at them and it was so chaotic, and did they even have their numerals systems like greeks did?



᚛ ᚁ   ᚂᚃᚄᚅ     ᚆ  ᚇᚈᚉᚊ     ᚋ  ᚌᚍᚎᚏ     ᚐᚑᚒᚓᚔ     ᚕᚖᚗᚘᚙᚚ᚜     
    ᚠ  ᚢᚦᚮᚱᚴ           ᚼ  ᚿᛁᛆᛋ             ᛐᛒ  ᛘᛚᛦ
                                                               

    b    l  f/w  s    n        h  d   t   k   kw              m  g ng  z   r
᚛ ᚁ   ᚂ  ᚃ  ᚄ ᚅ     ᚆ  ᚇ ᚈ ᚉ ᚊ              ᚋ  ᚌᚍᚎᚏ
    ᚠ  ᚢ ᚦ   ᚮᚱᚴ            ᚼ  ᚿᛁᛆᛋ                   ᛐᛒ   ᛘ    ᛚ      ᛦ
    ᛓ 
    б   вþ    opq       
These are my working boards, I roll things around to see how they work, and how crazy is this:

Because check that image, they don't see the difference between ᛦ and ᛣ, though they're different.

Could бвз turn into бгд elsewhere? Or was it the other way around? Was it frication or plosation?


do such comparisons make any meaning? I learnt it from roouh's work I recently revisited.


m/s   these are not just two mothers, the two forms of consonants, they are also two types of vibration: space (in metres) is horizontal, where we travel; time (in seconds) is vertical, which also makes sense.

km/h  these are as if with k inserted and h having changed its reading from s to h

(that goes to that A=FS apophenia. I do not cut it out into apophenia_sometimes.html only cause I'm lazy. Or because I am going to separate all these volumes into several books when the publishers are ready. And we never know what is apophenia and what is not. It is totally possible for some of this knowledge to be preserved by some secret influence groups. Yes, it is in realm of conspiracy theories, but then some of this knowledge was discovered in some fringey publications, such as Ganesh Vidya, The Aryan Origin of the Alphabet, The Formation of the Alphabet; and it became mainstream in field of corrective medicine as a communication board invented by Yeongchi Wu, who said that he just found it by working on it instead of pre-existing chaotic board his assistant used)
In The Formation of the Alphabet Petrie Flanders refers some Lepsius, Donaldson, and Taylor and I didn't yet dig there. Those are: Isaac Taylor (a son of a different Isaac Taylor) and his book Alphabet.



Thinking of how russian alphabet shows that K and R are to be changed back to
opqst (k is that q missing in russian alphebet) and ILMRN in which LMR are left-middle-right, and it may be the explanation of M-anomaly: when alphabet went from 3×5 of Carmenta to more modern 5×5 (Ugaritic is "more modern" than the mythic period, for it's in the historic period (mythic period is probably like my life's period predating the period of me writing those things down))
Ugaritic may tell of 5×5 alphabet, so I explore this possibility:

  A B G Ḫ D  (Ḫ ia lonf G, as the graphic side of it shows too, so being a variant it's not in ABCD (though C is both K and Tj))
*E W Z Ḥ Ṭ  (that is classic the hebrew line)

  Y K M Ḏ N Ẓ S   (the N (is it 𐎐 in your browser? it should look like 𐎃 rotated 90°) is definitely 𓈖)

  𐎓ʿ(ɔ) 𐎔п 𐎕ṣ 𐎖q 𐎗r 𐎘ṯ 𐎙ġ 𐎚t   (two of this and the previous line could belong to the next line)

   𐎛ỉ 𐎜 ủ 𐎝s̀

So let's try to reconstruct latin into something 5×5 (of the 26 letters, maybe X I can do without)

A B G ? D    
E V J Z ?
I M N R L
O P Q S T
U F H C K

Y and W were the last letters I had to arrange, and I was surprised they were voiced.

A B G Y D     voiced half
E V J Z W
I M N R L    ultravoiced middle (sonors)
O P Q S T
U F H C K    voiceless half

To my surprise, the first two lines are assorted by plosive and fricative (if Y is й and J is ж)
Now let's rearrange the voiceless half so that it also plays out that way:

A B G Y D   
E V J Z W
I M N R L 
O P Q K T 
U F H C S    (у ф х цч шщ)

or was it    I L M R N    to have L and R around the Middle?


It seems (by the name) we found the cow often mentioned in the legends of alphabet:

Diospolis is City of Zeus.                                                                                        𓋏

And you probably know her like Hathor, where she's called the superwife, as male gods became divine after the celestial marriage. Similar to Trimurti becoming famous because their wives were Tridevi.



Bat is more ancient and it is

𓈼 for sistrum (Now I understand why wiki uses images for egyptian hieroglyphs: because unicode for egyptian was messed up in the way that SeaMonkey shows the glyph following the one FireFox and any other program shows. So is it messed up or is SeaMonkey meddled with? Probably by some muslim who calls this script pharaonic in a derogatory sense. Jews also hate them)


B a T (the consonants of the greek myths and vowels in one a, as only aleph is present in three mothers)
bull and бык could be related words, bull~mule, bat~maat, because see the arrow in its overhead.

ba~ma because moo



231 is triangular number:
1 dot has 0 links
2 dots have 1 link
3 dots have 3 links
4 dots have 6 links
5 dots have 10 links (the pentagram and the links between its ends)
Is it why Pythagoras said that tetraktis is key to everything?
4 → 6
5 → 10
6 → 15
7 → 21
8 → 28
9 → 36
10 → 45
11 → 55
12 → 66
13 → 78
14 → 91
15 → 105
16 → 120
17 → 136
18 → 153
19 → 171
20 → 190
21 → 210
22 → 231
23 → 253
24 → 276
25 → 300
                25 is numero uno!
is it why runes are 16? is it why 21 is so cool? twice! and of course it's cool because of 7. and 3!

little~lethal






Old South Arabic is the one interesting me, because it links the two orders here:

and it's halaḥam has not only ḥ, but also ḫ, and thus halaḥḫam or even halaḥaḫam
and that additional letter, ḫ is in the fourth position in both the orders, which may me allow to try to compare the orders in the way I compared futhark to authefg
But that would immediately tell that

So I realized that there are more than one halaham standard, and I left the comparision unfinished.

𐩽     𐩭     𐩲     𐩾     𐩣     𐩱
are old-south-arabic numeral (right to left are 1 5 10 50 100 1000 and they're ? ḫ ʕ ? m ʔ (that ʕ which looks like o is basically o, ʕ is the academic weird sign depict ayn, and ʔ is aleph, so A the final numeral.))

and those ʔʕ stand next to one another in halahaham, in ao order

and the way ge'ez, phoenician, aramaic and hebrew do not distinguish between ayn and ɦayn is so wild, that I suspect a mess-up from whoever drew that table. Needs investigation it.
And there are even wilder clasters:

and the biggest mess is...

where old-arabic (both south and north) and aramaic have four letters, ge'ez and phoenician have only two, and different two too.
𐪏 for s (like sun) is supercool. Oh wow, they have unicode for Old-north-arabic, I didn't have it yet.

Thamudic D has very similar glyphs for Ḍ and S²

The Г is sick greek. 𐪔, and it looks like c like this, and it looks like bean like this

And in safaitic a similar form is not G but M:

but then their g is also bean-like, and somewhat similar to g, which could be the bubbly c too

oh wow, look at their square ta. NHH, ta-ta-ta.

and square ya is probably that 50 (𐩾)

Too many glyphs are similar to runes, so 1st century BCE to 4th century CE of Safaitic align perfectly with the historically approved beginning of the runes.

Their dal is definitely ᚦ (Safaitic is not in unicode yet, so I use the names given)
And it is followed by ᛦ-like glyph, and r is not too far from ð
And the next one is like ᚻ, but the reading is different
And the next one, transliterated as f, could be ᛈ
And the next one, gim for g, could be ᛜ for ŋ