Here's a better example:

Russia в ирландии вроде читается как руша, и в этом смысле у нас говорящая “фамилия”: рушим мы и вправду хорошо: наполеона разрушили, гитлера разрушили (про наполеона мне рассказывали, что банкиры его наняли дабы утилизировал пассионарную молодёжь, грежущую ещё одной революцией. В германии антисемитская молодёжь взбунтовалась, в россии просемитская, дабы разбить две проблемы друг о друга отвлекли дебилов на перемалывание друг друга. Сегодня похоже что красножопую молодёжь с одной стороны и коричневых, прикинь, nutsы, lead what you cannot stop they say.
Но что если разрушить не только собственную экономику и культуру (можно предположить, что основные акторы рассматривали эту культуру как субстрат (в лингвистическом смысле наверное так и было, другое дело что суперстрат двухпроцентной концентрации, newедомое но не невиданное доселе преступление.
Так, что если нарушить пассивное подчинения планам закулисы, а разрушить весь миропорядок, показав альтернативный способ управления. Макро-либертариан аппроч прочь is away, bad word, now you see why nations use different words? Because they read basics differently. BACECC (X=CC)
CC are different? one is k and the other is s, the open to palatalization is palatalized of the two.
KS? and I saw armanen G in ᛋᛋ:

Thus it has four strokes per line             
 but columns don't keep this count, being 5 and 7           
        Naturally, magic square demands another column.              

 A Г Δ
I  N M
V L W
 
but isn't it too much of a stretch? It is, but let's play along until something better comes along..
we have 8 per line, but columns are 6 7 and 11
Can I manipulate them to get it more magical?
 
A Г Δ
I  M N
W L V
 
And first I placed W for U, as double V, makes more sense then W being double U,
and then I naturally moved M where it stands today, and o miracle! 8×8 in 3×3

"Cегодня лицезрею?" - вопрос в будущем времени в форме времени настоящего.

улицезрею было бы точно в будущем, но не дополнительное ли слово [u]у ~ λ('ll, ł)



Interesting, avestan word for man reminds Masha, mother, which reminds me of icelandig word for man, also reminding mother: maður (mother is móður and móðir)
According to the Zoroastrian cosmogony, Mashya and Mashyana were the first man and woman whose procreation gave rise to the human race.
The names are from Avestan, nominally transliterated as mašyā and mašyānē, but like other Avestan words also, spellings (and hence transliterations) vary from manuscript to manuscript. Mašyā may thus also appear as maṣ̌iiā or maš́iiā or mašiiāi (and variants).
Originally and etymologically, Mašyā means "mortal being" as Old Persian martya, Persian mard and even Sanskrit martya also mean "mortal" and therefore "man". The root in Avesta and Sanskrit for death is mar, mr, "to die". The causative mâr means "to kill". Its derivatives merethyu/mrtyu means "death"; mareta and maretan means "mortal", and then "man, human being" mashya. For more on the etymology of the aša and arta variants of these terms, see Avestan phonology.
According to the creation myth as described in the Bundahishn, Ohrmuzd's sixth creation is the primeval beast Gayomart, who was neither male nor female. Ahriman, the Spirit of Evil that dwelt in the Absolute Darkness, sought to destroy all that Ohrmuzd had created, and sent the demoness Jeh to kill Gayomard. In this she was successful, but Mah, the moon, captured his seed before the animal died, from which all animal life then grew. From Gayomard's corpse grew a tree, the seeds of which were the origin of all plant life, and from the branches of which grew Mashya and Mashyana. They promised to aid Ohrmuzd in his battle with Ahriman, and gave birth to fifteen sets of twins which scattered around the Earth and became the races of mankind.
Indo-European connections to Ask and Embla have been proposed. In Norse mythology, Ask and Embla were the first man and woman, created from trees and given various gifts of life by three gods. According to Benjamin Thorpe "Grimm says the word embla, emla, signifies a busy woman, from amr, ambr, aml, ambl, assidous labour; the same relation as Meshia and Meshiane, the ancient Persian names of the first man and woman, who were also formed from trees."[1]

beasts are those who be,
as communist is who communes
(unites? usurps (is it because usurp is more advanced english than unite, retards are commies?))

but then Y could also depict what I saw as ↞, so those three still could derive from пометы of the beasts, those very . showing a dot or spot, | showing a line or road, Y showing the direction, thus vector.
(or were they possible to conceptualize dot, line and plane from something else? even though mark has two meaning, and because писа́ть~пи́сать


C: see ~ посмотри (где по приставка, а смо~само~самъ)  штрих ещё одно слово содержащее три.

And what am I doing here (isn't and collection of russian conjugations а и да? and~айда?)
иду = да
айда есть да в ответ на нет

and could easily be n (in dutch it is en (in is aan, op, bij, te, and even uit (out))) but they neeed to make people write а and дa too (now I know this is the weakest, the wickedest, some of the wildest takes in this book, but then what, why not)


weird, that tarot have the card for devil, but not for god. Is it why it's satanic? demonic? witchy

numerology was naturally intwined into tarot (and probably righteously so, because nobody seem to challenge it at large) so I can use tarot as a classboard to learn beliefs of the witches even if technically it is not that ancient, neither is ouija, but how did it get such vowel name? оуия it is. And thus it gives away another sequence of vowels. UIA, VIɅ
what is viy? вий, что это? что-то страшное. В Украине что-то значит более, надо учить украинский. Если заменить английский украинским, то изучение его займёт всего год, и по завершении курса ученики сумеют говорить (в отличие того как сейчас дело обстоит) и тогда им будет проще учить польский, немецкий, голландский, английский. Представь страну полиглотов. Европа страна полиглотов, и смотри какие они крутые.  Географически так получилось, что все языки европы рядом живут. Но венгерский наверное только эстонцы знают иногда.



Be GooD
CSee GooD
Doo      GooD

Ef Gh?                    И кто мне обещал, что past-abcd lines are read as abcd is?
I'm NL                        Nobody promised, but it would be cool. But likely it is not
Opf Que aRe SeT               or I have seen it already. So far I only saw some grammatic


Dharma (/ˈdɑːrmə/;[7] Sanskrit: धर्म, romanized: Dharma, pronounced [dʱɐrmɐ] ⓘ; Pali: Dhamma) is a key concept with multiple meanings in the Indian religions of Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism, among others.[8] Although no single-word translation exists for dharma in English (or other European languages),[9] the term is commonly understood as referring to "order and custom" that sustain life, "virtue", or "religious and moral duties".[10][11]
yes, I believe that ध र्म are D B, or rather З Б, being those BT of the greek myth, being MS of the jewish myth known from sefer yetzirah: म is literally Ma, and look how ध reminds ש and isn't र् which is that swasy above म, historically vowel? But no, the stroke below र may be, but र is not
𑀥𑀁𑀫 is dharma written in brahmi script, and here it is clear that 𑀥 is D and 𑀫 is M (and ᛘ)
From Sanskrit धर्म (dharma), from Proto-Indo-European *dʰer-mos. Cognate to Pali dhamma, Sauraseni Prakrit 𑀥𑀫𑁆𑀫 (dhamma).

Shauraseni Prakrit (Sanskrit: शौरसेनी प्राकृत, Śaurasenī Prākṛta) was a Middle Indo-Aryan language and a Dramatic Prakrit. Shauraseni was the chief language used in drama in medieval northern India. Most of the material in this language originates from the 3rd to 10th centuries, and represented a regional language variety with minor modifications to the same linguistic substratum as other Dramatic Prakrit varieties.[1] It may be based on the spoken vernacular around the 2nd century BC in the ancient state of Surasena.
Among the Prakrits, Shauraseni is said to be the one most closely related to Classical Sanskrit in that it "is derived from the Old Indian Indo-Aryan dialect of the Madhyadeśa on which Classical Sanskrit was mainly based."[2]: 3–4  Its descendants include the languages of the Hindi Belt, the Central Zone of modern Indo-Aryan or Hindi languages.[3]

Prakrit (/ˈprɑːkrɪt/; Sanskrit: प्राकृत, Sanskrit: prākṛta; Telugu: prākrutam; Kannada: pagada ; Tamil: pāgadam; Shauraseni: 𑀧𑀸𑀉𑀤, pāuda; Jain Prakrit: pāua) is a group of vernacular Middle Indo-Aryan languages that were used in the Indian subcontinent from around the 3rd century BCE to the 8th century CE.[2][3] The term Prakrit is usually applied to the middle period of Middle Indo-Aryan languages, excluding earlier inscriptions and Pali.[4]
Prākṛta literally means "natural"[dubious – discuss] as opposed to saṃskṛta, which literally means "constructed" or "refined".[4] Prakrits were considered the regional spoken (informal) languages of people, and Sanskrit was considered the standardized (formal) language used for literary, official and religious purposes across Indian kingdoms of the subcontinent. Literary registers of Prakrits were also used contemporaneously (predominantly by śramaṇa traditions) alongside Classical Sanskrit of higher social classes.[5]

    c. 1500 – 600 BCE (Vedic Sanskrit);
700 BCE – 1350 CE (Classical Sanskrit)

The most archaic of these is the Vedic Sanskrit found in the Rigveda, a collection of 1,028 hymns composed between 1500 BCE and 1200 BCE by Indo-Aryan tribes migrating east from what are today Afghanistan across northern Pakistan and into northwestern India.

The Rigveda hymns were composed and preserved by oral tradition. They were memorized and verbally transmitted with "unparalleled fidelity" across generations for many centuries.[28][82] According to Barbara West, it was probably first written down about the 3rd-century BCE.[83][84] The manuscripts were made from birch bark or palm leaves, which decompose and therefore were routinely copied over the generations to help preserve the text.
There are, for example, 30 manuscripts of Rigveda at the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, collected in the 19th century by Georg Bühler, Franz Kielhorn and others, originating from different parts of India, including Kashmir, Gujarat, the then Rajaputana, Central Provinces etc. They were transferred to Deccan College, Pune, in the late 19th century. They are in the Sharada and Devanagari scripts, written on birch bark and paper. The oldest of the Pune collection is dated to 1464. The 30 manuscripts of Rigveda preserved at the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Pune were added to UNESCO's Memory of the World Register in 2007.[85]



It's a pleasure to tell the truth. People lie when they're affraid: врёт~срёт(от сраха (прикинь, не только худо, но и страх происходят от неприличных слов))

хуй похоже инский, плохой, в русском языке
пизда хороший. давай сравним.

Язык из матриархальной культуры? Где мама - очевидно лучше чем папа.
до изобретения богов, семья и люди вокруг твой пантеон. Кого-то обзывают именем персонажа культуры, таким образом "архетипы" реализуются в людях. Древние типы? Я не читал, только слышал термин, необразованный, но получая образование я бы этой книги не получил где я живу, в общем, самообразование единственное образование имеющее значение. В остальном людей надрессировали сдавать тесты, без гарантии дать таким образом человеку понимание. Но я же понял как работает станок, когда чертёж его внутренностей рисовал. Помню, меня это не увлекло совершенно, у меня были совсем другие цели поступления. Оболваненый школой я понятия не имел для чего поступаю тупо карабкаясь по служебной лестнице. Но начал бухать даже раньше чем начал курить шмаль. Это было чудовищно, я сумасшедший в состоянии алкогольного опьянения. И кто не сумасшедший в таком состоянии? Тот кто не превышает рекомендованных дозировок. Тот, кого научили пить алкоголь.


AEIOU and EIOUA coexist in a ring with those five letters.
IEOUA being the common modern form tells me that E~I (i is dotted e (see both letters handwritten))
and looking for examples, I played big:
William Shakespeare's handwriting is known from six surviving signatures, all of which appear on legal documents. It is believed by many scholars that the three pages of the handwritten manuscript of the play Sir Thomas More are also in William Shakespeare's handwriting.[1][2][3] This is based on many studies by a number of scholars that considered handwriting, spelling, vocabulary, literary aspects, and more.[4]
how could that be that not a single play in his hand is found? Was it staged orally?
here, maybe they found something:

and that wikipage had an abecedary, but i is missing

and e is not what I had in mind:
..and it seems nobody draws i with belly under dot, as if it was ė, but I did, I took pleasure in it, as a kid.
but looking at other people's hand I can see that e to i is like Б to Г. no, like Б to Г̇ or like Б to Г̣

Wtf is the minuscule b, no wonder I couldn't read the text above it. And it recollects bc.html, I copy that image to bc.html, whatever it is, it is fascinating. Let's notice what is unusual by lines:
The first line tells that it is not english, not only by alphabete instead of alphabet (notice the unusual h)
also because




I was speaking of i looking like ė, and here Felis in older version is Feles in the newer looking edit.

And I took that e~i thing from eioua being ieoua, and because ᛂ is literally ᛁ with dot.
And because ᚠ~ᛘ and ᚵ~ᚴ~ᛚ~ᚿ and dots may tell where which letter appeared. If that table was accurate, G is from K, a voiced form of K is later, it's natural. And isn't it why G is also dʒ? Why? what's the meaning? Because C is that K, K is staved C, C is staveless K, thus ᚲ is staveless ᚦ. and it exposes ᚦ as Г more than Д, though ᚦ reminds not only D, but also Д (think of runes going from the bottom corner with ᚦ being rotated and thus looking like Д.


And here is example of lines without going no reverse boustrophedon.
But the line on the bottom of the text is upside down. And it seems to be in different set of letters from the main body of the text, and of the same set of letters as the left-most vertical line, and thern  three lines at the top of the stone act weirdly: two of them go in linew we modern people do, but the third one flips to reverse boustrophedon. And of those three lines, two and a half go in the fontface of the main part, and then it ends with plenty of ᛟ, which is only used in the counter lines, and plenty of ᛌ's not used elsewhere, and it ends with ᛇ also not seen elsewhere. It all screams "fake" into me, but then I say it to calm down, I don't know what is the reason behind those discrapancies discrepancies (my english part knew that word and it knew it right, it fits here perfectly, while russian part didn't know what it meant)



eioua, I told you, boey


(mirror)
Tabula Angelorum Bonorum 49

I brought it here to show how B is the first letter, like ultimately, like so many times, like why





Duodecim gestata Vexillis

That book starts with O IEOVA ZEBAOTH, which is obviously O Jahweh Savaof, and it shows it's not Jahweh, not JHVH, but IEOUA, as I read after or before I rationalized it myself (I know I found it after I consciously figured that order, but chances are I read it and knew it subconsciously at first)

and g.t. recognizes IEOVA as Jehovah, so it is not some obscure secret name, it seems to be regular latin.

And I can read latin now! What an impressive technology. It seems some other guys are going to deliver what I was working for. Well, my approach is thoroughly different, and thus it is of value. I keep on doing what I am doing and at some corner I will come out first.


But I brought that duodecim gestata vexillis here because of two words catching my attention:
Meridies et Septentrio, because from the context I recognize them as north and south, and on the basis of південь~south and північ~north (even though now I can see that полдень is noon and not summer, and полночь is midnight and not winter. But why do I guess if those other words are west and east or morning and evening, let's ask g.t:

Meridies et Septentrio is South and North, but they remind me March and September. And march opens hot season, september begins the winter, thus north. Interesting theory, but let's not jump to conclusions

Oriens et Occidens are East and West. And they don't remind any months to me, but then they are etymologically speak about what sun is doing, while South and North are understood by the calculation



So, interesting shapes are:
a with a stave(ᚪ?)
b like k
c like г
D and d like Ↄ and ט
e as к and e as ט and reverse e
E as C with 2 in it, as if e is the second form of C (is i third then?)
E as Cz, and E as something different
double f as П, and what is that whirl at F and G
between g and h what is it? is it G or is it H?
some weirdest forms of H, which why would I recognize?
I as J, no big surprises here, only where is the minuscule fform? it's around l in il, but what?
                        only it is dashed. Why would it be dashed?
Some forms of k show how that weird fraktur form 𝔨 appeared, and if your browser shows it as R with long stave, here, I copypasted the abecedary with form of 𝔨 I was referring to:
Some forms of M look like Ж, and is it related to ᛘ~ᛉ и Мать~Жена?
Some N also have a weird form, or is it M? M's and N's are mixed together, the couple of small ones after that, are they m or n or ŋ?
double o as ∞ is very sweet.
And then some O reminding D very much, even the dot, even the double column.
Some P's are very weird, one reminds handwritten ף, other looks like 4e,
Q's are normal (so are F's, does it tell that they're newer? look at the table above and its Q as Oſ)
R shows its direct relation to k, and one of its shapes is extremely off the wall, 
some s remind з or ξ, some s remind σ, some s remind t!!!

some W's looking very much like M make me think of woman having that very W which is M
M of имею, м of моё
W от awe and owe and own, M от my and mine (ne in mine is probably の in 私の (is 禾 m, is ム(or 厶) い? ))
厶 Radical 28​Radical 28 meaning "private" is 1 of 23 Kangxi radicals (214 radicals total) composed of two strokes.
ム is mu in katakana (not i, could be due to .. what am I talking about! I take some wild allegations, even assumptions, and I apply them to actual corpus of not one, but ALL languages? just few. Okay, just few. But what does it serve? Drawing never noticiing do d noticed axons.

In that previous typo I probably wanted to tell than not ing but ed, but my suc subconscious mind told that do is that ed.

do ~ ago (for go ~ иду (и энд а пробабли ар negating prefix un in (u ~ и (is un a form of in, which is a from af i, which is probably ã))))

X and Y look very similar, I would only recognize them from the context.
some z's are like s's with swashes and some z's are like wut


does the upper swash of a tell that it is something wider than o?


I can see how future and будущее are cognates, and in it I can see how ᚠ and ᛓ are the same, but I need more examples of english f being russian б (see how the belly of the б can be a swash)

And before I was speaking of ᚠ ~ ᛘ, so now I see ᚠ~ᛒ, the double wave up. but then the ᚴ~ᚿ thing tells that it doesn't matter if it goes up or down (one way it goes up, flipping into reverse boustrophedon it goes down, and visa versa)


is (cossack)казак косарь(scytheman)? (in hebrew a similar word חָזָק is strong)

(scythe)коса cuts and why did they call braid коса as well?
scythe and sickle share the sc part, в русском это понимается как с(off) к(to, but also k of cut and kill, somehow russians understand it when then place a finger to the temple to say kh to show the act of killing, конец is an euphemism of dead, мёртв) and кончать is an euphemism of kill, убить)

scythe is probably a cognate of коса, and scythians too. Is science of scythians?
which makes me question if scythians are cossacks


Now that is some place I should visit~! When the war is over maybe I will.

B D
P T  ?   
graphically I can justify it as having less in ammount, less in size, less as loss (of leaves for example)
B more abundant than D (two lips and one tongue)
P is less abundant than D? voiced is bigger sound than voiceless, and T is both voiceless and tongue's.
so both graphically and otherwise they make sense, especially as
BD
ПТ
(voice is bubble for it's full of life as a leaf, voiceless is dry as a stick)
is wish to make the counterpart of BD staveless variant of them placed Ζ up front in greek to be З reflecting B? is c the opposite of d? c is great final letter, and t~s thing is noticed in many contexts.


Correcting s into c, I noticed that c can be seen as the upside down e
and if a and e are rotation of the same shape, then s and φ-like handwritten ש is the same shape as s:
почему нет может быть истолковано по разному (и так что нет "почему")

Just as god is cognate of гад, so бог is cognate of bug:


 B D
 F  Г
Μ Λ
П  Т
W V


> Ain is the highest and first of the viels. It is literally translated as 'nothing', or simply 'no'; it is absolute emptiness, the opposite of existence, complete absence.
> Ain Soph is the middle of the three viels, and it proceeds from Ain by necessity. It is literally translated as 'no limit'. If there is nothing then there are no boundaries or limitations; this is the limitless foundation - the eternal in its purest sense.
> Ain Soph Aur is the lower viel, situated closest to the Tree of Life, and it proceeds from Ain Soph as a necessity. It means 'limitless or eternal light'. Without any limitations, all things happen by virtue of the fact that there is no reason why they shouldn't.
In the light of this tradition, why do jesuits promote the big bang fallacy? Were quabbalists the good guys all along?
Well, I don't know about the good part, but even broken clock shows right time from time to time, and here they're likely to be correct.
And yes, some intellect is poured into that school of thought, so probably it is correct more than once or twice.

Is kabbalah of kaaba?  (interesting, I find k more disrespectful than c (and q seems more respectable))
So C K Q are all the same in the context (as C S Ч are in the other

Наверное на веру? Верим в это? И оттого расхождение (наверное звучит как наверняка и означает может быть (но наверняка значит лишь 100% тогда как на верняка, на верняках, если несколько))
х[h] as plural suffix? точно, посмотрев все падежные окончания можно нарыбачить кучу суффиксов.


Братан наколол себе уэльского дракона с британским флагом на крыле, и я это интерпретировал как то, что дракон Георгия выжил, и наколол себе флаг хозяина на крыле.
Святой георгий на русском гербе означает, что мы за щитом Великобритании. И с кем она союзничала, с тем и мы. Русский король сотрудничал с немецким перед революцией? А великобритания захъватила нас обратно при помощи репволюции

The Church of Saint George in Lod (Lydda), Israel, contains a sarcophagus traditionally believed to contain St. George's remains.

The city also finds reference in an Islamic hadith as the location of the battlefield where the false messiah (al-Masih ad-Dajjal) will be slain before the Day of Judgment.

So does that depiction shows the future event? That st. George will be resurrected to slay the beast?



ве́тер ветра́     (и именительный и винительный)
ве́тра ветро́в
ве́тру ветра́м
ве́тром ветра́ми
о ве́тре  о ветра́х
Таким образом ударение меняет время, т.е. время изгибает ритм.
Таким образом ударение меняет число, т.е. число избегает в изменяет ритм.
измеряет~изменяет  (это можно в учебник физики в раздел квантовой физики внести)
но это лишь в этом контексте может быть, давай другие посмотрим:

сначала ритимически похожее на ветер
ко́зырь козыря́
ко́зыря козыре́й
ко́зырю козыря́м
ко́зырем козыря́ми
о ко́зыре  о козыря́х

чуть иное ритмически слово
де́рево дере́вья  (до сих пор именительный и винительный совпаадают)
де́рева дере́вьев
де́реву дере́вьям
де́ревом дере́вьями
о де́реве о дере́вьях
в этой ритмике ударение всё также сносится правее, но не на два слога, а на один.

ме́л ме́лы (но блин, это слово всегда в единственном числе
ме́ла
ме́лу

ко́л ко́лья (именительный и винительный совпадают)
ко́ла ко́льев
ко́лу ко́льям
ко́лом ко́льями
о ко́ле о ко́льях

Т.о. если в слове два слога, то при множественном числе ударение смещается с 1ого на третий,
       если в слове три слога, то при множественном числе ударение смещается с 1ого на второй.
      а если один, то на нём и остаётся? проверим. А при четырёх слогах?
полоте́нце полоте́нца     (именительный и винительный похоже что совпадают почти всегда)
полоте́нца полоте́нец
полоте́нцу полоте́нцам
полоте́нцем полоте́нцами
о полоте́нце  о полоте́нцах
если четыре то тоже не меняется ударение?

революция: при пяти не меняется? Но я уже зашёл на территорию женского рода, насколько помню, здесь другие окончания, может и система ударений другая? зацени:

блю́дце блю́дца  (но я нечаянно взялся за средний крод, но им and вин совпрадают)
блю́дца блю́дец
блю́дцу блю́дцам
блю́дцем блю́дцами
о блю́дце  о блю́дцах
исправляюсь
таре́лка таре́лки
таре́лки таре́лок
таре́лке таре́лкам
таре́лку таре́лкуи       только в единственном числе винительный падеж отличается от
таре́лкой таре́лками
о таре́лке  о таре́лках

но и в русском мужском роду то правило не всегда выполняется:

баго́р багры́ (им энд вин совп.)
багра́ багро́в
багру́ багр́м багра́м 50грамм
багро́м багра́ми
о багре́  о багра́х

т.е. ударение изначального слова значит больше?

му́сор      мусора́
му́сора    мусоро́в   
му́сору    мусора́м
му́сора    мусоро́в         а здесь винительный с родительным совпадает!
му́сором     мусора́ми
о му́соре     о мусора́х
мусор или мусора в зависимости от значения, но в одном из значений слово мусор всегда в единсвенном числе (и это пример неисчесляемого в русском языке (но, в отличие от английского, много на мач и мэни не разлагается))
при этом ударение ведёт себя так же, как в козырь и ветер, но обнаружилась аномалия, я понятия не имел, что винительный принимает форму то именительного то родительного падежа, раньше я просто (да и все остальные) лишь знали, что какие-то падежные окончания совпадают. И (даже если специалистом это всё ведомо и классифицировано, проще переоткрыть эти закономерности, чем в их некаталогизированном многословии эти классификации искать) давайте выясним что влияет на поведение ударения и окончаний винительного падежа
Предполагаю, что винительный падеж матерный, а матерят лично или родителей.
в местоимениях винительный падеж отличается от всех, давай в местоимениях посмотрим

я                  ты          вы       мы       
меня          тебя       вас       нас      
мне            тебе       вам      нам     
меня          тебя       вас       нас
мной         тобой    вами    нами
обо мне    о тебе   о вас     о нас
(a не совсем последовательно их расположил, но множественное число отличается от единсвенного, суффиксы множественного числа совпадают, но погоди..)
но родители вас звучит не по русски, значит это неверное употребление суффикса стало нормализовано, но не перестало от этого быть неверным? ведь надо мои твои ваши наши, но это отдельная песня, это фрактал или просто кроличья нора внутри кроличьей норы)
давай рассмотрим местоимения множественного числа  мои твои ваши наши их.. я забыл третье лицо, но там суффиксы совсем другие будут. множественное число распадается на рода, и тоже на три (три по три (по три? и плюс четвёртое, множественного числа (хоть я и про средний род сначала забыл, он она они только видел, но даже в английском he she it they)))

    он     она     оно    они
    его    её       его     их           see! here is no other variant other than the possessive pronouns!
    ему   ей      ему    им
    его    её       его     их    но смотри, здесь винительный падеж этими притяжательными является
     им    ею      им      ими
о нём  о ней  о нём   о них
         ею иногда обращается в ей          
(и очевидно, что средний род это выпердыш (ц and щ demanded the place of ш) мужского, т.е. мужской род, который в именительном кажется женским (полотенце, блюдце) но в остальных падежах ведёт себя как мужской)                                                   
fuck, this subject overwhelms, so no wonder I could never grock   it.


Roman numerals are real predecessor of modern decimal mal, why mal? decan? octal же decal, а, потому что кал. те, кто заведовал языком, обосрали термины нового поколения, вот же обезьяны.
Я отменяю k-stolbets, kak ya romane otmenale bukvu k, voobsche dazhe chtob zvuka takogo ne bylo. Is it ht e birth of G?
did they invent god after the predecessor of the alphabet was invented?
isn't K Kronos? in greek it definitely is.
Cronos, Qronos, even Xronos, naturally it is time itself, quite an abstract concept.
Gronos? no, this is on the opposite side of the k, h is the old g, g is the new h. And before hronos, it was just abc? a b d? bd?
                                            bd
                                            pq

So, the same form? two forms, ☯
So alphabet bust must have appeared where they had known ☯
OR, ☯ appeared where they used aбgдe (chinks recognized that symbol as "o, tai chi" and me russian never knew that name, though I knew tai chi as a gymnastic slowmove)

Large magic wand (combination of wood and crystal (I wonder if chinese recognizes it, or hexagrams))


Hexagrams, I was so close to decypher it with them.


Pythagoreans were ghost writers of Pythagoras
(were they his ghost writers after his death? They probably were, that is what culd does: not many people know who wrote bible, it is as if attributed to god himself. But then scholars know the actual authors of bible (but then they argue that Moses couldn't write the Exodus. Naturally he did not, unless he predicted the events written in that book. They walked 40 years, because he thought he will see the transcendent vision of the "promised land")

земля обетованная звучит как земля обитаемая (и тогда бы в предыдущем контексте она была обжитая духами, чтоб люди строили там, где духи град воздвигли. Зачем бы?
Но обещанная в этом контексте значит реально предсказанная (и тем типа доказывающая, что и всё остальное было не пиздёж)


Do words феи и музы (фея[feja]~[muza]муза) show how far the same protosound can deviate?
Because technically fairies are muses are fairies.


Очевидным вдруг сделалось мне, что сынки всех тех жёстких типов, что у власти, затюканы своими же жёсткими батьками (а те, кто сохранили стержень, не сломались, не прогнулись, (став не стержнем а скобой (скрепой?) в коленно-локтевой, как сынки что при батьках остались) либо съебали из этой копро-тусы, на запад конечно, не к корейским же братушкам) и неспособны быть такими жёсткими, всё проебут, причём очень повезёт если не самым бездарным способом. Надежда на принцев, что уехали и их вся корруптомолодь знает, и они умудрились сохранить хорошие отношения с ключевыми фигурами этого аристотостада. Но это какая-то сильно дикая фантазия, крутые если съебались, то явно у них другие планы нежели царствовать над этим всем.


Наверное придётся иучать изв изучать ритуальный каннибализм, ибо колдуны знали какие железы кушать чтоб пёрло. Может быть у животных съедали самые вкусные части. В той стране, где куру-куру зафиксировали, там точно сохранились верования каннибалов, наверняка и антропология про этой теме следовательно проведена.
(следовательно там было для красного словца, от слова исследование типа, но грамматически не следует, хоть и более чем вероятно)

I think I should издать три (хотел сказать две) версии книги:
в том виде как написано, экстатический текст со всей глоссолалией
в отредактированном варианте (как буклет (буклет слово плигодное дла детского изика, блосула не отень (т, а не с, потому что нефрикативная, хоть и транслитерируется как тщ, если тянуть, то очеслышно переход чщ, ч почти щелчок, как и ц, и быть может ч и ц когнатные морфонемы к африканским щелчкам, но это лишь educated guess, sorta educated, I know about clicks only that they exist)))
и в третьих упрощённый текст, для иностранных читателей: где "более чем" заменяют на "очень"

потенциально и четвёртый вариант мерещится, в детском изике


15 runes of Bureus (he took it them from somebody, as an anthropologist. Because some villages used runes up to 19th century, and vicious revival of the norsk culture in the 20th century was по горячим следам от осознания того, что их культура не используется больше)

15 runes of Bureus reflect 15 runes of Carmenta, so (unless he fabricated them after her image, leaving one behind intentionally, which is an incredibly audacious supposition, and it doesn't change much: 16 runes are closer to the 15 than to 26, and that could be the butthurt of rome, christian and otherwise, that germans have kept a more basic script (by preventing masses to know about it, probably, otherwise why wouldn't they write books with it) and thus campaigns against it are caused by semitic rascality) those are probably the same system, and because

So, some structure could there be. We know of 3 aettir, and 15 can be divided only in 3 and 5, so 3 by 5, which reminds ogham.

I read into my own work, written maybe 4 years ago, in 2019, it's late november of 2023, and I do not recognize what I knew then
And I compared ᛆᛒᚦ with ᛄᛓᚦ of fbthark, those ᛄᛓ are forem of ᛆᛒ but if ᚦ is third in both.
but I checked and indeed,
ᛄ    A letter of the Runic alphabet, present in the Elder Fuþark (ᛃ), the Anglo-Saxon Fuþorc (ᛄ, called ġēr), and the Younger Fuþark (ᛅ, called ár in Old Norse), representing /j/ in the Anglo-Saxon Fuþorc, and associated with the year or the harvest.
but I took it from wiki, anybody could write it, it is not wikipedia, it's wiktionary, so no links to sources, but I think they are also moderated better, I don't know why, but I have the feeling, that trolls attack those laconic pages less, and them being laconic may keep them under more thorough check, but it's mostly an assumption.
> associated with the year or the harvest..
> called ġēr
> called ár
isn't it year. isn't ᛃ год? gg? gд? half of the year is closer to the sun than the other. Doesn't ᛃ show tilted yearth? Does word year links the change of seasons to earth and not sun? Sun is the same s-n, samenNL

samen ~ совместно (yes, probably cognates, maybe constructed in russian of russian elements by dutch specialists to sound home, intentionally or accidentally, or the mis similarity of those words is accidental per se)



What is the easiest way to draw a tree? ϒ but no, this is grass, tree is T (it has storeys, you can seet on it
T is for Tree)
Other way to draw a tree is ᛘ or ᛉ, but san (both three and mountain in japanese-chinese (japanese still use old chinese readings of hieroglyphs, and which form of chinese (which chinese language) brought chinese to Japan))
M is for Mountain ᛘ is probably mountain road. two mountains are at its side, and such form is closer to chinese shape: 山

Chinese roots of runes tell that runes are older than other alphabets. But what if M (alphabetic shape, not runic shape) was egyptian way to draw mountain: 𓈋

𓈋
Representing two hills framing a wadi. Compare the Chinese character 丘. The hieroglyph was generally colored yellow or pink with dark spots to represent desert and rock, and sometimes its base was colored black or green to represent cultivated land. Archaic forms (and occasionally Old Kingdom and later forms) show the outer sides sloping instead of vertical. The phonogrammatic value of ḏw is derived by the rebus principle from its use as a logogram for ḏw (“mountain”).
Dw (ḏw)
    Biliteral phonogram for ḏw.
    Logogram for ḏw (“mountain”).
    Determinative in mntj (“the two mountain ranges”).
    Determinative for names of foreign countries, by confusion with    (𓈉).
𓈌
Representing the sun rising or setting between two mountains. This sign first appeared during the 5th Dynasty.
    Logogram for ꜣḫt (“place of sunrise or sunset”).

btw, wadi (plural wadis or wadies)
    A valley, gully or stream bed in northern Africa and southwest Asia that remains dry except during the rainy season.
    Synonyms: nahal, wash



G-D Gospod-Deus? God-Devil? It would be rother chonese, but oi thot of jewish
Gnostically? Yes. I am insane. It is intense.


Did jews brought culture to europe from japan? Mere phonetic similarity is not accepted to be a proof of anything. Modern consensus is such, but then isn't breaking the consensus what a researcher should be doing?

Sometimes I recognize that I am a fool. Which rises question: how do I know that my science is good?



керований is transliterated as [keˈrɔʋɐnei̯] thus russian ы (украинское и) can be transliterated as e

ъеьэюя.. are they all forms of some omega? emega? юсы.
юс большой, юс малый и их йотированные форм? и действительно ётированы лишь два из четырёх, and both stand in the end. What are ъ and ь? Probably some reduced vowels, I need to check ancient russian manuscripts to tell. Bolgarian manuscripts, the words which cognates contain ъ and ь today, no matter in which language, in all forms and shapes. The only way to really know.

Friday fry! Saturday сатурналия. Sunday is about sun. And again we go more sophisticated, to Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, and this disparity I think I researched before, but i'll leave it to historians of astronomy. In this draft I raise question much more than I give answers to them, because everything new and unverified by further research is more of a question than of an answer.

Saturday.. english preserved the planet. The planet of Saturn. This is the god of the Jews. But how did they know? How long have they seen?

They say we saw it first only in the 1980s:

So is it some queer coincidence that jews selebrate saturday and that they have hexagram associated with them and hexagon is on saturn? Or do they secretly have astronomic technology not known to others? Or did they preserve some cult based upon some concepts of previous civilization?




these tables are rather fascinating, I wonder if they're true or not, I'm clueless and just guess yes



Is Bad general term uniting Mad and Dead?



if this image is true, 16 played some important role in Pythagorean school of thought.
And in this light runes of youngef futhark could be connected to that tradition



and once again, some roman cursive

you've got it right this is another random collection,

J . Bücking, Anweisung zur geheimen Correspondenz systematisch entworfen c. 1804. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Libraries, Institute Archives and Special Collections



Original author unknown, cited in Abraham Rees, Cyclopædia (1778) David Loberg Code




This music cipher was supposedly proposed by Michael Haydn (brother of Franz Josef Haydn). It appears in an appendix to a biography about Haydn by Werigand Rettensteiner published in 1808. David Loberg Code

A e O e U I? and I could only find that aoeui is how dvorak goes
but then I understand, that
A͡E = Ä
O͡E = Ö
U͡ I = Ü
and I also learned that this symbol of legato is called in english slur


швидко ~ ф (fast?_)_ ~ swift
swift ~ quick:  K asn s and S are two different ways rt to read C
ш is another way to read the same с

So if k~ш~s are the same thing, read with different accents, I guess.. I can find the protoshape?
K is staved C
q is staved C too
S is what? C with swash, Çç literally tells that S is C with that ,

ABC is thus all other lines. Aeiou are all arbitrary, you can sing vowels as high or low as you wish and you can depict them with any mof many.
В is read as V in russian
V is read as F in german
F is vow voiced in hebrew
F is read as W in hebrew

e f just opened as "et vow" get high! (I'm already high for the sackoned time today, it's 22:12 and I translate from my mind, which probably works on this stuff overtime, and as you may see, gives some fruit)

abe dius deus     was opened as the first line
e f has no sense to be "et vow" in this case. abe deus et.. feir feya

faRie~феЯ (naturally ie is уменьшительно-ласкательный суффикс, ласкательный меня в детстве всегад выносило что wut)

et fag? fagh? fgh
ab gd eve gh? goddess~gh? dess~c~г~ч~h? dess~ц принц? принцец? принцесса, ss is female, puSSies is a derogatory term in military.

LMN was opened as LioN (io~me)
i and o are vowels around LMN (especially in italian and irish)

not Lemon, lion, LIMN? ILMNO? el Muno? lal lune
llune ~ юн? was lune only used for young moon? hardly so, but as raw and naked guess, let it be grey
see, so far I only guess, but recognize it as sophisticated poetry, the ultimate pangram, pangram having letters in alphabetic order (pangrams allow to repeat letters, as both initial letter and letter in use with others.

ABe G-D (was that - why many abrahamists write like that?)
EVe ..exactly, I must use kikk d kiddi alfabet

(what iuf abe was how it went. literally.. as in saom e  paleohis.. alpine
Но я должен добиться признания,
чтоб все её жертвы ради меня не были зря
Вернее, они уже по факту не зря, но хочется чтоб и она это знала.
Для того, чтоб окружающие признали мои заслуги, эти заслуги должны получить признание.
(но к чему я это говорю? для возможноно читателя, чтоб в стол совсем уж тоже не писал)

but the meanings 2 and 4 don't seem to be correct. Why would it mean bold? To censor getting high. Why would it be translated as to mourn, if they got high? Definitely some misconceptions in egyptology I came to figure out, and naturally I will have to use ai knowing those writings systems.


I don't know if this may tell that dice indeed was used in ancient times for something other than recreation, because even though Lincoln sounds american, it is from an old english church:
The main difference between jewish and christian faiths is that jewish faith allows sin, it just invents way to circumvent the sequences, even if originally they invened way to get rid of them.

In sefer habahir there's answer to the question I asked:

Why am I bringing it here? because they answered one question I had, and thought they didn't give the answer I suspected and still do, they're an interesting piece to the puzzle, yet to be researched not by me or not tonight.



LMN is Loves Me Not (I was looking for jисус кристос loves me, but N was right there)
Only Pater Que Rests Sitting in the Tree? Were they having trees so tall that clowds clous clouds rested in their crones ск krones thrones crowns

Were diamonds in crowns used to fool people that sun itself lives in that thing?


Were tree so high it produced clouds? By breathing? By evaporating what it drank from earth.

We have to model world with much larger trees.
Only if today clouds are formed above forests. It's hard for me to imagine desert with clouds.
Clouds are natural habitat of forests. Of green in general. But forests are mythier. mightier, multilevel.
(clouds and forests are symbiont, one is the natural habitat of the other)



Be is blessing.
Abe is father, and literally anti-be (instead of be, and a as a negating prefix)

B is the first letter, because it is blessing.

is K the way to say bless you in hindi? आशीर्वाद [aasheervaad] blessing benediction felicity benison
अभिमंत्रित करना [abhimantrit karana] bless invoke
प्रदान करना [pradaan karana] provide endow bestow confer supply bless
गौरवान्वित करना [gauravaanvit karana] ​glorify dignify crown bless
वरदान देना [varadaan dena] bless
only now have I finally learnt that [] are both typed by pinky (in qwerty) before this moment I didn't know it either consciously or subconsciously, so I always had trouple with them
and I like that karana thing, it fits my needs as a candidate to compare it with the writing system (and I especially like na syllable, because of -n being final in japanese, but then I know some writing systems in the region, and I assure you it is a reformed take, originally it is wu, but they began pronouncing final syllable as n, so they don't teach wu anymore, but they still teach ha, but it is because it is still ha most of the time, but once that changes, somre reform of interpretation of the writings system will take place, until they deviate to alphabetic set. So I saw by my imagination.

Benison is a cool word. And together with Benediction it tells that Bene is what Basically is B
And GooD is in there by the will of angles? Runic culture gave birth to alphabet, imagine their shock.
But first it was roman. Truly? Are all roman abecedaria fraudulent? I should research the unusual abecedaries. I bet the unusual ones keep some keys, unless they're mere mistakes. Some abeceday beginning with B can not be a mistake. But then will it be preserved, if later generations will tend to add A up front. See, front is also convenient for adding the letters. So is AIEFGH of venetic the actually a primal order?
So I didn't guess right, but I found that B is also prevalent in words for blessing: in sanskrit it's

保佑[Bǎoyòu] is bless in chinese. And probably thus bopomofo is the way they start their abc, the way they name their abc, and regardless of the graphemes, the order can have a deep history (history instead of story is probably a jewish way to say istoria, so all russians use that ה, which is (if we trust phoenician order) e, not и, thus eсторее [estoree (ещё старее (когда кто-то обвиняет, а другой защищается, рассказывая предысторию))]

They say, maps of the continent used to be upside down. Probably because people of the south were drawing them? Or because son is there. Orf course Sun is there, it's natural to place it up there. Thus mup would show South (Sun is Solntse in russian, and they don't pronounce l, so it could be ł)
I will not be much surprised is if Thot is originally Sun. But here I feel physical discomfort around my shoulders and navel,  because Jah is Sun. Rah!
But then I think orphics taught that all gods are incarnation of the same force, so they taught what later socrates taught? monotheism? But can I trust GRSMead? I read his book, but only because it is small and I must keep on reading, but why? Internet is much better medium of new information than books you have to read for hours to find something useful, even if, some books are empty, just movies, or worse.
All words are the same ABC in different forms? But then ABC is three letters, and I think

Suddenly it came to me that gangstwer mentality of russians is fed by their media products: when good guys were shown weak, and their songs sucked, but bad guys were always shown cool. I think the same shit is transmitted into american heads,


But then suyat sequence supports that karna sequence, but what does it matter, if karna is do and not bless? karna~karma (incarnate has that very karna as its root? see, if the languages are similar stories of one reveal stories in the other more often than russian and japanese or english and japanese, and those distant languages do deliver, so imagine the flow of revelation even wider, my fingers can type in only this much)


They say it existed in philippines before christians came, but is the sequence genuine or influenced by europeans.  If we see that R is not existant, and we take L as that r in carna, we recognize L~r just as in camunic ᛚ rotated wherever the way, while it stayed vertical. But technically no sideway ᛚ can be seen in their set of letters, so technically you could twist too, as we naturally do, but it was not shown in that table several pages ago, so I guess they didn't have it, as we twist our letters, but we don't lay them on back, but upside down.. russian g and д are both d. Yes, we still do that. And d~D too
Dg is interesting letter.. isn't it that arrow-like ᛚ? like ᛚ~ᛐ~t~d, so abt oпт is almost all. Если всё заберёшь скидку сделаю! Technically опт is not all, but lot, but then ..what? It could be a synonym of all in the past. But it is only a speculation. Yes, it is.

That baybayin in abakada order,

Either way, that kaganga is the first time I know how this sequence is called. I wonder if kana is from it, I guess it is.

I think in the case of kaganga I don't image that I imagine the sequence makingh the name, because I do not imagine the sequences, I am good at noticing them. And though naturally some chaotically born sequence of the kind were possible, maybe some knowers kept the knowledge and monitored cultures to avoid those blasphemous ocasions. As to take blasphemy as order could be taken for plasphemy, but then isn't it what it was? no galshemy would be the world.

A Kankanaey burial cave in Sagada with coffins stacked-up to form a sky burial within a cave.


And some other opinion on both order and some glyphs:


They have only three vowels, and with that they immediately stroke me with its resemblance in this account to old-persian syllabary. And they got some more on these writings systems since I last checked them, and this one explains that minority report:

Surat Bikol not having B makes me think of how much thus order reminds the kaganga order, but that is all abacadabra. And that is how it goes in dutch:

But then those R's can be explained by hebrew:
Several folk etymologies are associated with the word:[2] from phrases in Hebrew that mean "I will create as I speak",[3] or Aramaic "I create like the word" (אברא כדברא)
but then there's this:
The religion of Thelema spells the word 'Abrahadabra', and considers it the magical formula of the current Aeon. The religion's founder, Aleister Crowley, explains in his essay Gematria that he discovered the word (and his spelling) by qabalistic methods. The word 'Abrahadabra' also appears repeatedly in the 1904 invocation of Horus that led to the founding of Thelema. (The Equinox I, no. 7. 1912)


Musical theory taking notes with high frequency as high and notes with low frequency as low fucks up human minds.
When I was a child, when I first met that concept, I thought: how? why? it should be the other way around: high is about amplitude, as high in the hight: elephant is tall and thus high, and it sounds what they call low, but why low, big animal sounds big, big and high are synonyms in the main context.
Low makes the same pair with short, and short statured mice indeed sound what they call high, but they do it in the sense of frequency, so the cognitive dissonance is sown deeper: in the physics. high number of frew que que frew frequency. So it happent with no malintent, naturally, so other homonymic antonyms have the same reasons. But I am here to say about two other cases of the cognitive dissonance: ball bouncing the flour bounces with higher frequency the lower he gets, so probably I judt s just confused frequency and amplitude, though in the case of strink it is phase, the larger the phase is, the lower is the frequency. But no, wrong again. The larger the period is the lower is the frequency.
Should I tie low to large?  The same volume spread at large territory is low. The same volume stacked on small territory is inevitably high. So high and large is not a synonymic pair. Though What is the synonym of high? big. But big is a larger concept, combining high and large and maybe many too. a lot


1234   5678
 \ \ \ \ / / / /
        9              (1+8=9  2+7=9  3+6=9  4+5=9)

Sum of first 36 digits equal 666..
Let's see if the first 36 digits may be distributed within in 1 5 10 50 100 500
1 = 1
2+3 = 5
4+6 = 10
5+7+8+9+10+11 = 50
12+13+14+15+16+30 = 100
everything else naturally adds up to 500
And there are plenty of ways to do it, let's look at the other one.. But why? Why do I calculate the satanic numerals, when I must be inventing the tree of life so to say. I am tricked? I'm tricked by devil, nice to meet you meat.

And why doesn't it want me to achieve immortality? I'm too annoying to keep on living. This will pass.

Once we may have the dialogue, let's figure this out (be it used as work of fiction later, may it be the psychic game (in both senses, yeah)
So let's make a deal. Soul is probably self, so no. No? Trade. I work on this work.. you already work this work. You're enchanted by this work.


Let me be! What do you want? My soul? What for? I don't know. But I ask help from someone I don't know. SO I SAY NO.

NO? Good-bye/

What a cheap melodrama. If gods or just spirits exist in the real fluctuations or whatever, we have to learn to coexist before I'm dead. To like eachother. And if they mostly live in the heads of believers, we also should keep piec pei peace
keep piss as in not to piss off (surprising is it how dirty protoancient language was?)



human's mind, humans' mind (this shape is twice wrong)
or human minds so s jumps in some other context.



So, spirits, why spirits, I don't drink alcohol. I pray to green fairy and to white goddess I saw and I salute both shoulder demon and shoulder angel. demon shouylder and angel shoulder (I read them from left to right. But maybe jews are right that they salute Angel first, and then stay with the left one..

truly 36 is an interesting number. And because christian church has demonized 666, it must have been such interesting a number that it was more important than today. Check this out:

If 36 is magical, then so is 6 (and 8? was 36 considered to be magical in the world of V being fier?)
36 is 4 times 4+4
(2+2)×2=8
(1+1)×1=..2

Numbers are fascinating thing and naturally they fascinated people of the past. So 666 is old school, the anti waht christ was brought, so they're antichrist from the point of view of christians.

And thus, digging deeper than Christ, I found what was before him. I descend here as Jesus descended into enferno to excavate out of there something good.

What story is this, that Jesus returned after he descended into hell?

Let's envoke to muses instead.

I wonder why it is so difficult to get actual photograph of the stone in open access, I think I brought it here before, it must be somewhere in previous volumes.  But today I could only find this:

which is also cool, because this is a different angle, but it's not complete, like wtf.. I don't know if I should contact that Ron Tappy. Is it a bait he layed out? Either way, I have additional scepticism to everything coming from Israel, it is a sneaky tribe and too much of geopolitics are around it.

I look at this stone, and it doesn't make much sense to me. It is not a work of art, so how was it laying around seemingly being never put in wall? The scratches seem so thin, how didn't they got messed with? Overlaying writings and strokes are a nice detail, but they don't make much sense to me either: it is just a rough stone, why not eraze what you wanted to change?


Думая о тех ду́хах, осознаю, что это неизбежно отпечатки людей (подобно тому как мефистофель отразился образом паши свиридова (цыган, но сказал бы что еврей я бы поверил (неоседлый образ жизни сохранил привязанность к хуцпе, ушлости, чертам неприличным в оседлом обществе (потому что в оседлом обществе они являются проявлением ..глупости? нет, не обязательно, но очевидно нелюбви. Кому нужно жертвовать любовью ради сиюминутной выгоды? Тому кто уедет прочь, в другой город, кочевнику. Все гады кого знаю уехали дальше на гастроль. И в этом тоже мудрость мира. Что с глаз долой из сердца вон. Иначе это для них небезопасно, люди разные и кто-то захочет отомстить кровью унижение смыс.. смыв)))

Но ту, кого я назвал белой богиней, я не узнал. Быть может, это образ собирательный. Наложение всех классных женщин? Великая матерь? Великая материя (мать это, видимо, современный, лаконизированный вариант, типа Б-г (бог, благ, бандерлог впрочем тоже, но что это за слово, не советским ли переводчиком внедрённое?)
G-d(god, good, gold, greed, gingerbread, grandparenthood)
Were God and us compared as gingerbread and bread? b-d (bad)

g is good
б is bad?

Хвостик! Это хвостик! Хвостик снизу когда хорошо, а когда вверх хвостом подняли или вниз летишь это плохо. Когда хвостик снизу, то рыбка плывёт вверх.

Оттого жизнь полосатая, что вверх-вниз, вдох-выдох? Но пусть эта полосатость становится всё светлей. На уровне того что пить хочу сейчас, и выпив воды дал светлую полосу клеткам горла и печени, в уме вертелось, тоже.
Запятая между "печени" и "в уме вертелось" нужна лишь чтоб было понятно что именно тоже.
Но если убрать вторую запятую, то смысл точно в ту же сторону переключится


бля~для - таковы все матерные слова? их надо только узнать?
ебать~опять? повторы делают вхождение еблей?
хуй~кто?     кто~que-это?     кто-это~хуета
пизда~бездна? без дна, оттуда люди выходят. пизда позади:? пиздуй~по-заду? пиздец~безdeath?

титикака такое по детски дикое, что естествнно это не в японии, а в африке.. так плохо я думаю про африку, как ни стыдно. а титикака в южной америке. титикака, ай хэв ноу бангхоул.
тити попа кака, всё глухие согласные. и даже пися! табуированность даёт глухоту?
блядь очень звонкое слово. бля на д? бля и блять~блядь одно и то же слово, так может это глаголь? глагол тоже глагол чтоли? глаголь.. глаголю, глаголим,
глаголь = glagoli, it has i, so glagolю is glagolia: a~o~u, don't palatalize consonants, and thus in syllabaric sense they are not three, but two vowels. O and I?  ו and י, now it makes sense. In both writings systems O is large and I is smaller. Just as mouth being open more or less makes sense in articulatory representation. Thus I indicates, that we rotated the original text 90 degrees, and yet we're to figure out which way. Was [i]и(and) link like — and then being separated with — shape being left to punctuation. is ? c the ךִ or something? כִ (yes, I'm speaking of qui (paradoxically half of the world will learn this french word because of that juif))

пися бесится? пися висит? хуй гу..д? хуй же худ, а если озвончить, то гуд, и столбы как божество? деревья же столбами, деревьям видимо молились как воплощению матери земли.  Особенным деревьям как её особым представителям.

зайти на беседу ~ зайти на пизду? были глухие и звонкие одним и тем же? д~т, это я с детство разумею: ть в делать определённо to~do
do go is to go? well, maybe it used to be more the same then than now, the semantic deviation is subtle even now.


I think I found the proto-I: ꟷ (I found in one of my earlier works, I need some ai to keep it all in mind, as I intended to have, before I allowed myself to write everything down, to document every thought, not only the certain revelation, but everything so the uncertain ones are not missed. We'll figure it out somewhat later. I am still acquiring the material for further research, I collect the observations. Of any kind. Some of them have already lead to some consistent narrative, which I here and therefore call booklet. That booklet, where every sentence is whether something new or a comment to that new statement in a form of well-known or less-well-known facts.
The Sideways I ꟷ is an epigraphic variant of Latin capital letter I used in early medieval Celtic inscriptions from Wales and southwest England (Cornwall and Devon). About 36 monumental inscriptions in Wales, and about 15 in Cornwall and Devon, mostly dating from the 5th-6th centuries, make use of this letter. Except for a single inscription from the Isle of Man, it is not found in monumental inscriptions elsewhere. The letter is used exclusively in a word-final position for Latin words (or Latinized Celtic names) in the second declension genitive singular.

memorial stone in Tavistock, Devon, inscribed
We can only see MACCODECHE and maybe the T is below that garbage, but why is it stands as a column, when the text is aside, and if the text continues into the ground, wasn't it placed here after that stone was written somewhere else? And that concave oval-like shape probably held a piece of wood? And its current owner used it as a part of his fascinating fence.
I can only guess if FI is digraphy, or indeed they used both I and ꟷ within the same text.

Or was that stone installed as a tombstone and later it sank into the ground made of growing biosphere shedding leaves to compost them into soil.

Compare this stone to tel zayit. It's hard to imagine that Zayit stone was used as a grammar artefact and it wasn't drawn deeper into it. So inconsistent, so fake, and imagine how obvious that monkey business become to

If we look at hebrew pair of ו and י, then we can notice that they're the thinnest of them all, which may tell of their emptiness in the context of consonantness, they're pure vowels, and thus I is originally o, but then it is also u, and their neighbours consider ا a.



а в
я ж
и к
о с
у

These are simplest (one-letter) words in russian.
ж всё же же. но не являются ли в, к, с, краткими формами слов во, ко, со (но почему по до п не сокращается? б is a short form of бы, мы знаем что не просто б, но бы, словно название буквы би)
но мы знаем и что во ко со, а не вы ку си.

о это тоже буква же со смыслом. в отличие от е (же это название буквы Ж)
а б в            а   бы  во  да
      ж          её  ёж  же за
и к              и   ко  ли  мы на не~ни но ну  

вот это Н дало!  НА НЕ~НИ НО~НУ

o   c            об по Ра со ты те та то ту (ы=и!)

вот это Т дало! ТА~ТЕ~ТЫ~ТО~ТУ

сё и то.. сё~сие

И это я забыл про С! Сее Сии Сей, всё трёхзначные, значит не забыл.

у                  у уф  ха це чё ша ща
           я                эх эй  юг   я  як

ко от к чем-то семантически отличается? нет. значит двубуквенные не составные, а сами по себе морфемы независимо от состава. et[e] = [i]и?

а                я
и               у
  к           с
         о

and here I realize that I forgot about в. In russian в is similar to o and у (о is about, and у is at (at and about are not exactly in, actually they're к and с.. к~у с~о? с~u, с~о)
with ~ u c (two hands one in the other? female hand is upwards (does it tell that females were short? that young girls were married? I would easily expect that from ancient warlords, and mohammed demonstrates such behaviour.))

в looks as double о, so not just about, but in. разница меж у и в. Единый вав, но в глубже
о у в это история вхождения: о-коло, у двери, в замке



Water (море) Woman (mother)
Fire                                fother

Did people modify their language when they invented fire?

Looking at word furnace I cannot help but ask: is fur and fire cognates? fur catches flame, I guess.



I was asked by a buddy to write a song. Or did I offer it? What was it? Both?

время нам на встречу идёт
мы могли бы тоже стремиться
приближая то что грядёт
точему данОсуществиться

Нарушенная ритма (не фи не рифма но ритм)
и пример обхода, данный фонетической лигой на О открыл другой смысл (не дано, но над. н дан. Not all which o is, all~around(ll~round?) but one chance. it's given to you, please play cool.


грязный~rгрозный (картавый, каричневый, карий, от слова кар, и кап, кал)


попс is literally поситивная песня (по значит пох? positive, the opposite of negative))

попс is literally populars

pop goest to the top.
pop top could be a part of alphabetic song of such kind:
up bob cop dope
or did each line had its own rhyme? four letters per line could be four lines in a line.


abnormal even has the un-like suffix abnormal:

who would have known that absolute has an abbreviation. And the word absolute is alphabetic, in the sense that it starts as ABC and ends with T, even though it's guts, the olu are not in the alphabetic order, unless o and u are ו, or rather is o is ו and u is o. absulot would be the case, or..

is U~F? is I~Г? because U=II (u~ɪɪ)  here I reconstruct the text aroung these two sceenshots, I was foolsh enough to allow the laptop go down before I ctrlSed it.

See is C (the word see is homonymous to the name of letter C)
Видь is as more basic than Видеть as See is simpler than to see.
ВRU is as third a letter as CLA, is it the way eastern CDB and western BCD parted ways? But then english see is more eastern than russian видь, where дь is merely a verbal suffix. But в is in, which may be the key to understand the main meaning behind видение, if you saw you have it in you, you can tell what it was. If you didn't see, you can only hear about it. Isn't H just behind C? in abcefh, maybe, but what is it.
And at first I found this, and the arrogance of abkhazians apalled me, but them what if they're trying to say us something? What if their name tells a story of abc, their own alphabetic legend.

If abdominal muscle is just ab, then the points it must connect are a and b.
or is it just an abbreviation of abdomen?
The rectus abdominis muscle, (Latin: straight abdominal) also known as the "abdominal muscle" or simply the "abs", is a pair of segmented skeletal muscle on the ventral aspect of a person's abdomen (or "midriff").[1] The paired muscles are separated at the midline by a band of dense connective tissue called the linea alba, and the connective tissue defining each lateral margin of the rectus abdominus is the linea semilunaris. The muscle extends from the pubic symphysis, pubic crest and pubic tubercle inferiorly, to the xiphoid process and costal cartilages of the 5th–7th ribs superiorly.[2][3]
The rectus abdominis muscle is contained in the rectus sheath, which consists of the aponeuroses of the lateral abdominal muscles. Each rectus abdominus is traversed by bands of connective tissue called the tendinous intersections, which interrupt it into distinct muscle bellies. In people with low body fat, these muscle bellies can be viewed externally in sets from as few as two to as many as ten, although six is the most common.
I think I found my A, alba, but the other line is called semilunaris, and b would be a good crescent, but the hypothesis is not supported yet. So until I come over some ancient names of those lines, I leave it behind.


















The linea semilunaris is a vertical, curved structure that runs along the lateral edges of the rectus abdominis muscle in the anterior abdominal wall. It is the site of union where tendons of the lateral abdominal muscles meet the sheath surrounding the rectus abdominis muscle, also known as the rectus sheath. The lateral abdominal muscles are the external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis muscles.
The linea alba is a longitudinal, fibrous median raphe along the rectus sheath formed by the fusion of the anterior and posterior walls of the sheath. It may be visible as a surface marking on individuals with well-developed abdominal musculature running as a depression between the xiphoid process of the sternum and the pubic area.
It separates the two parts of the rectus abdominis muscle which lie laterally. It is traversed by the umbilicus. It may be visible as a surface marking on individuals with well-developed abdominal musculature.

raphe[раф] is definitely a terminologized cognate of rough[раф]
(but then it is only a volk etimologie, feelings based science, not very certain, but if it helps to remember the term, it's alright)

жевать от слова зубы  (да, настолько далеко разбег чтения некогда одного и того же символа)
жувать тогда, и действительно, жувать ещё лучше: жуй
так и совать видимо изначально сувать: суй
а ховать хуй нужно. хуй буквально означает ховай, прячь. И для понимания этих тонкостей русским необъходимо изучение украинского языка и украинской культуры.
суй и хуй антонимы? если сувать внутрь, то нет. синонимы быть может даже. ᚼ~h~ʃ~ʒ~ж~ᛡ[j]

буй
дуй
жуй
куй
суй
хуй

бой
вой
кой
мой
ной
пой
рой
твой
хой
цой

бай
ваяй
дай
знай
лай
май
пай
тай
хай
чай

бей
вей
гей
дей
ей
зей
лей
имей
пей
рей
сей
чей
шей

вей и рей похожи как ᚢ и ᚱ

вий
дий
кий

и не было? была только е? отчего так мало слов и все чуд чужие?

a
e
o
у

a b c
e v g
o p q    in this representation c[g] g[ʒ] h[ʃ]
u f h

twelve probably was for some time (evg~imk or imn or even iml (L~Г, λ~ג, Λ~𐤂))
so we know 12 months, and probably cuneiform 60 are related to those 12,

I read those
abc as april may june
evg  july august september
opq  october november gecember
ufk   january february march
I have three direct coincidences, how probably was that? I chose one, april came there because of a, it could be august. Let's try it with august and shift the frame of reading to see if a for april, o for coctober, f for february was an anomaly.
abc august september october
efg november december january
opq february march april
ufh may june july.
only january sorta correlate g, gevier? why do I even use english? because I know english, so I apply it here, and which else language could it be, french was for sometime, being closer to latin, but then british intellectuals probably worked with latin and calqued its marvels into their own language, so modern english is quite alrigh. Or it never was about latin, because letters appeared somewhere else, in some other language, in some germanic language, for example, amongst runes. Because alphabets don't have anything runes don't have, runic culture has many more elements. a and o don't look like ᛆ and ᚮ in latin, for example, F and Г don't meet neither in latin nor in greek, so runes just make more sense. And they're used for divinations, and magic is really ancient.

I make myself a freak by proposing weird ideas. Ideas on which nobody even thinks are weird.

SS is SuperStar

грежу и брежу
грезить и бредить
грежу и брешу?
грешу и брешу? (пакошу и вру?)

is бред 𓃀リᚦ "нога режет топор"?  или моё учение бред? не половину так точно, но я позволяю бред в этом труде, ибо из него выкристализовывается что-то более осмысленное.



А O У Е И  is how ogham hav has ti it

A E И О У is how other alphabets have it

A И У Е О is how japanese kana-tachi have it,  but I O A is how IrOhA goes, but then how does it go? It starts with pure I which is interesting and very promising, if the syllabary european alphabet came from is japanese and not paleohispanic for some reason, but then I know it came via paleohispanic because how similar runes to paleohispanic glyphs.

いろはにほへと      Iro fa nifofeto 色は匂えど Iro wa nioedo  Even the blossoming flowers [Colors are fragrant, but they]
ちりぬるを                   Tirinuru wo 散 りぬるを Chirinuru o  Will eventually scatter
わかよたれそ      Wa ka yo tare so 我が世誰ぞ Wa ga yo tare zo  Who in our world
つねならむ              Tune naramu 常ならん Tsune naran  Shall always be? (= つねなろう)
うゐのおく やま Uwi no okuyama 有為の奥山 Ui no okuyama  The deep mountains of karma—
けふこえて               Kefu koyete 今日越えて Kyō koete  We cross them today
あさきゆめみし  Asaki yume misi 浅き夢見じ Asaki yume miji  And we shall not have superficial dreams
ゑひもせす              Wefi mo sesu 酔いもせず Ei mo sezu¹   Yoi mo sezu  Nor be deluded.
(I can see a lacking syllable in the third line. is it that perfect imperfection they value)
three out of five vowels stand in the beginning of their line. And those three are no other a i u, the ones keeping their position relatively to each other (not to one another, to each other, feel the difference) in japanese and latin.
But then in hieroglyphic form it looks otherwise:
and here it has I and A as the opposites, in russian one makes syllable palatalized, other does not, and U is A in this account, as bus is bʌs. And notice that it also has o above e. And probably not a coincidence by based mathematical consequence:
I is the vowel of the first half of iroha, A is in the very middle of the second half of it, U is in the middle of it, separating I half from A half. And A is literally in the middle of the second half: it has 11 syllables after it and 11 syllables between A and U. Halves have 23 syllables each, with 47 total.
And all three numbers are prime numbers (in russina they are called simple (простые))

The first appearance of the Iroha, in Konkōmyōsaishōōkyō Ongi (金光明最勝王経音義, 'Readings of Golden Light Sutra') was in seven lines: six with seven morae each, and one with five. It was also written in man'yōgana.
Structurally, however, the poem follows the standard 7–5 pattern of Japanese poetry (with one hypometric line), and in modern times it is generally written that way, in contexts where line breaks are used.

It says, that it was written in lines, not columns. Is lines ancient traditioin in this region too?

It is said[by whom?] that the Iroha is a transformation of these verses in the Nirvana Sutra:

    諸行無常    Shogyō mujō        All acts are impermanent
    是生滅法    Zeshō meppō        That's the law of creation and destruction.
    生滅滅已    Shōmetsu metsui    When all creation and destruction are extinguished
    寂滅為楽    Jakumetsu iraku        That ultimate stillness (nirvana) is true bliss.

Iroha sequence is also interesting in a sense that I O A indeed go in this order within the poem.

It is truly the alphabetic sequence: The Iroha sequence is still used today in many areas with long traditions. Most notably, Japanese laws and regulations officially use Iroha for lower-level subsection ordering purposes, for example 第四十九条第二項第一号ロ (Article 49, Section 2, Subsection 1-ro). In official translation to English, i, ro, ha... are replaced by a, b, c... as in 49(2)(i)(b).

and musical notation I noticed before, I think I also noticed that the final note is To

The story mostly seems to be around vowels. Labials, linguals, those are purely alphabetic play. Probably that is how alphabet came into being separately of the previous writing systems.

色 [i] colour
有 [u] be, have, exist (in chinese) in japanese it is yes, but also posession, so it's have.
於 [o] in, at
衣 [e] clothes
阿 [a] flatter     (it is a hidden wisdom of wearing something colourful make other people feel good, because you vivid their day, or that you dress well to meet them)
And this sequence tells, that u is of o, and e is of a, also those pairs are two to one syllables apart.



abyss ~ abc


They say, reading bible backwards is satanic, but what kind of bible? In which book it ends? I guess I have to try all 66 or more if there is more.

And jewish bible ends with יעל, which is technically a goat with the largest horns. Though I guess in that context the meaning is defferent, because I can see nothing in the translation about the goat.
and then in my edition this line follows:
תם ונשלם תהילה לאל בורא עולם  Glory be to God, creator of the world
תם (finished, which is easy to remember, because ת is the final letter, and ם is sofit)
ונשלם (and paid)
תהילה glory
לאל no.. (but then I can see that it is two words: ל אל (to god))
בורא creator
עולם world
But to understand it, we have to delve deeper:
בורא creator (but if we dare to separate ב, it immediately separates ו, opening the underlaying רא, Rah, which can be translated from hebrew as See, which makes sense since 𓂋 is R, but I thought it was mouth, was it an eye? אני רואה [aní roé] is I see
 But then it is probably not a part of bible, but a separate spell. Because world is not as cool as goat?
Because it is written in different font:

יעל (שם מדעי: Capra) הוא סוג במשפחת הפריים. היעלים נפוצים בעיקר באזורים הרריים ברחבי העולם הישן.
תכונות
יכולת טיפוס
Го́рные козлы́, или просто козлы́ (лат. Capra), — род жвачных парнокопытных млекопитающих из подсемейства козлиных семейства полорогих. Некоторые виды этого рода называют козерогами, два вида, обитающих на Кавказе, — турами.
Домашняя коза (Capra hircus) — одомашненный представитель этого рода, который произошёл от безоарового козла, в настоящее время выделяется в самостоятельный биологический вид. Доказано, что она одомашнена более 8500 лет назад.
   הָרִים הַגְּבֹהִים לַיְּעֵלִים“     — ספר תהלים, פרק ק"ד, פסוק י"ח”
בישראל מצוי המין יעל נובי, שנפוץ בנגב, במדבר יהודה וברמת הגולן. הסוג יעל כולל גם את מיני העזים. עז הבית, תת-מין בסוג זה, בויתה מעז הבר
Capra is a genus of mammals, the goats, composed of up to nine species, including the markhor and many species known as ibexes. The domestic goat (Capra hircus) is a domesticated species derived from the wild goat (Capra aegagrus). Evidence of goat domestication dates back more than 8,500 years.
Wild goats are animals of mountain habitats. They are very agile and hardy, able to climb on bare rock and survive on sparse vegetation..
So hardly it is a coincidence, so the bible ends with the story of god  and his goat is with him, probably telling that devil is the God's goat.



I wonder if eat is reduced form of feed, which is related to food, and to питать, which is related to пить, where п is probably related to פֶּה (mouth)
IUOEA  oroha (R~U(ᚱ~ᚢ)  and E~H, which is Е and И in greek, both vowels, so iroea? iuoea!
AIUEO  japanese hiragana and katakana order, and also order of all philippines syllabaries.
AEIOU  standard latin order, not only latin, but modern latin alphabet alright, georgian too.
AOUEI  ogham's order, it doesn'a share aiu sequence of latin and japanese, it lista lists a
IVXLCD reflects IUOEA (I U could be all there was: the beginning of the first half and the beginning of the second: 23 and 24 (a prime and 2*2*2*2*3)
But then is it so across the numeral systems or is it only a fluke fo of the decimal?
Numeral systems don't change the numeral reality, was my firest response, but let's think.
In trinary ternary it would be 2*2*2*10, it would be..

1    1
2    2
3    10
4    11
5    12
6    20
7    21
8    22
9    200
10  201
11  202
12  210
13  211
14  212
15  220
16  221
17  222
18  2000
19  2001
20  2002
21  2010
22  2011
23  2012
24  2020
  
and that 2020 is 2*2*2*10? But then I don't recognize these numbers, thise 10 is 3
20 is 6, so 2020 is somehow 4 times 20, or 11 times 20. What's going on here?
11 acts as 11 in decimal, even though technically it is a strange way to write down 4 (triangle of 3 balls is their 10, and 11 is just one more ball to that 10, but can you see three as 10? then 0 is 2? welly, it as if symbolizes that. People naturally played with different numeral systems before they settled with decimal. But then hands could be playing the crucial role in the evolution of numerology.

Ternary is a whole different way to think of numerals. Let it be my sacrifice to numeral muses. To mathes. To mothers? Three muses working with numbers are mothers? The norns? Are norns even mothers?
Are norns drawing numerals?
What if they're three times three muses, three in general, but within each three passions? Probably no, they're nine sisters. And the way I attributed them to digits, letters and notes is probably not correct, they share those instruments. Do they? I guess they do, they are happy fairies, happy deities. f~d? гг~d?

Узелковое письмо (цзешэн) предположительно существовало в доисторическом Китае до изобретения иероглифической письменности. К узелковому письму в китайской традиции возводилось возникновение письменности, а изготовление ткани или сети ассоциировалось с созданием письмен и текстов[4][5].
Упоминания об узелковом письме сохранились в литературе древнего Китая, в Ицзин (Книге Перемен), Даодэцзин и Си цы чжуань[4].
Легендарному первому императору китая Бао Си (Фу-си) приписывают как изобретение узелкового письма, так и пришедших затем ему на смену триграмм:
    В древности Бао Си был правителем (ваном) Поднебесной. ... Исходя из этого, в начале создал восемь триграмм, чтобы проникнуть в добродетель просветлённого духа и распределить по родам (классифицировать) суть десяти тысяч вещей. Создал узелки на верёвках (узелковое письмо), сплёл сети и силки, чтобы охотиться и ловить рыбу. (Си цы чжуань, II, 2)
    古者包犧氏之王天下也，仰則觀象於天，俯則觀法於地，觀鳥獸之文，與地之宜，近取諸身，遠取諸物，於是始作八卦，以通神明之德，以類萬物之情。作結繩而為 罔罟，以佃以漁。
and trigrams to which this wave took me is also something to dig deeper into, because it tells to describe 万 things, more than hieroglyphs do, or about that. So naturally the two systems are connected, and binarity of trigrams make me think of binarity of knot and no-know no-knot (of knot and not)
And to my surprise, trigrams can come in different order:

I wonder what it is supposed to be, and why not the symples hieroglyphs are associated with the simplest hexagrams which are trigrams, but then hexagrams cannot encode 10000 things, only 64




and probably the root of the difference in hexagrams shown above:

Fuxi's "Earlier Heaven" (above) and King Wen's "Later Heaven" (below)

but those were all trigrams, here's how hexagrams can be obtained by combination of trigrams:

probably it can give some wisdom, about agriculture and sociology and who knows what, finance maybe, but I only touch this filed, this ䷁


Utero ~ intero (uteral~uternal  ~  internal) в сравнении с русским словом нутро (от внутри)
interno ~ inferno?  чрево зверя? вознесение лучше разложения? смерть от старости лучше кровавой? это очень древние понятия и вместе с тем очень умозрительные рассуждения
насколько корректно такое представление, интересно (uterus~interest? интерес, внутренний что-то? или inter означает между? между стен? after all, it's interior, but then in is the opposite of ex of eter exterior.. but interior shares inter with internal, in-terra? ex-terra? is in inhaling and ex exhaling sounds?)


English is also pretty fucked: how comes word rational has rat in it. May it be racionalism, but then everybody cry that it is obviously about race, which is probably even true, because what is rational is measured according to cultural norms, which are directly national in nature.


partly and hardly (one is so easy to be heard for the other, yet are they antonyms or synonyms.. or both)


A B C
A B G
A B D        because the only alphabet with three letters in the first line I saw is ᛆᛒᚦ


банда ~ b and d (бабка и дедка ~ папка и детка ~ папка и тётка (что я хочу сказать? глухота-звонкость обращают значения на каком-то базовом лексическом упровне? или что нет разделения по полам в разделении на губные и язычные (пока не знаю, наблюдаю)))

банда означет связь, как и bond, bondage, but bandaid. b on d? b an d?

может это слово только случайно алфавитно? maybe ban is the root and d is a suffix? бинт вообще говорит что глсн лшн, омонимы возможноы, но ы

если банда изначально семья, простейшая социальная связь меж bабой и dедом, то банды и сегодня семьями называются.



ABD [abd(d~g (but then T next to П makes me think it was just D[d]))]
EFГ [evʒ(ʒ~ɦ (but then is Ψ х or k? I can see Х in Ψ, the χ))]
ΙΜΛ
ΟΠΤ
ΥΦΨ (at first I thought it was ΥΦΡ, but Ψ is in the right position and graphically is also just right)

ΙΜΛ and ΟΠΤ are torizontal horizontal, while ABD EFГ and ΥΦΨ are vertical doublings



Наиболее древнее протокипу состоит из 12 свисающих нитей, некоторые из которых были с узелками, и нитей, обмотанных вокруг палочек, обнаружено при раскопках герметичной комнаты одной из крупных пирамид на археологическом объекте Караль[10] (в долине Супе) археологом Рут Марта Шейди Солис (Ruth Martha Shady Solís), датируется по стратиграфическому слою приблизительно 3000 годом до н. э.[2][11]; в связи с чем кипу может считаться одним из самых древних (после шумерской клинописи и египетских иероглифов) видов письменности у человечества[12]. До этой находки самое старое кипу радиоуглеродным анализом датировалось 779‑981 годами н. э. Столь большой промежуток между этими датами пока не нашёл объяснения у историков.
Читая вики, понял, что кипу могла быть числовой записью того, что привязывалось к главному шнурку (если лист кукурузы, то кукурузы) но это поверхностное понимание, но говорят, что единичных узлов не больше 9, более сложных узлов не больше 9, самых сложных узлов не больше 9, и мол узлы сложнее располагались ниже (если нити свисали) что очень похоже на числовую систему (если только цифры буквам не соответствовали. А могли. в европейских языках так уж точно, но без абеседарии или силлабарии говорить не о чем, удивительно что тоже девятки максимальные цифры, как у европейцев, но может с количеством пальцев напрямую связано. что десять это полностью all-in, но всё равно немного странно, что представление похоже ..на старинную европейскую запись, на ту что существовала у европейцев до позиционной. Но как древня она? у евреев видимо была в ходу с незапамятных времён, и повлияла на европейцев, отбросивших ради неё римские и им подобные этрусские цифры)





e looked much more like ה, if that table doesn't lie
and f looked like that. and if e is ii, then f is ij
and some forms of l are the opposite of f
It doesn't make sense,

In pompeian wall inscriptions lmn made l1 l3 l2 if you look to the few on the right of that.

e and n look ridiculously alike. but then desn't not not don't и and н do?

IU'm  suspicious about that table, but I think I must put it in mind too. Why? Ai can keep it in mind and I should respecialize. I should teach ai to focus on this, by teaching it on my notebooks, I should dedicate myself to reaching immortality. I was given this chance of reaching it, I should put into it some labour.



Today I sent to Johannes Richter..
So let's try to play with 3×3 some more:

and I wanted to add some more information to him, but I leave it here instead (I'm not sure he likes my contribution, he seems to ignore it, so I even asked him if he likes what I tell him or not, let's wait till he answers, so far I have to leave it here:

WTR would be english water 🜄,
FR  would be the two of the bar acroos it, that would do earth, not steam, weird, 🜃

Water and fire seem to be the only two which started alchemy. People probably boiled salts out of liquids first.

If 🜂🜄 were the first forms, two direction, meeting and giving birth to all the world? They were the world, the world we know is interconnection of different waves, so the first connection could be called a beginning of the world, but what it is is next stage of the world. Before that differences only grew, but two противонаправленные силы создают момент, вращение, и на микроуровне появляются все ммкм микротурбуленты

That 🜃 could be made by two 🜂🜂s or two 🜄🜄s or by 🜂 and 🜄, they both had that bar, which made me go away,  (was it automatic writings?)


Пиши по русски говорю я себе.

Потому что на русском думая открыл эту тему, потому что русский первый язык, потому что русский я зщна знаю лучше и только хотел сказать что опечаток таких потому менее делаю, но и могу меньше на менее исправить если именно такую опечатку я сделал.
Потому тчо кр что русский глубже у меня и потому им больше увижу. Пусть англичане английский разбирают.


Бей Дай
Вей Зей~Жуй(зев~жёв~зоб)

а в английском Buy Die
                           Wij  Zij
                           Mij  Hij
in nederlandsk it's definitely pronouns
So if you ain't dutch you ain't much (ain't is a not, something not, eine niet of soms)

Э Ю Я
is A U C?
Аз~Яz
Ю~b~Вв~V~U
Это~Сие (е is lingual vowel, u is labial vowel, я is йотированно, но а is pure, even if it's ã)

UVW may also be a rudiment of grammar within abc's, because Vi is you and We is we. Is there a language which cognates latin vi and english wi? something like this would be very weird for such antonyms would thus be very homonymous.
And when me measure, we'll find that no language combinese w for we and v for you.
English has y not too far, and I think it's the very same greek ϒ which is V in old latin.

uvwxyz
Z makes great Zie
We You Zey?
You We Zey.
U     W     Z   could easily be the last (or second) line
How is it that V and Z are in the second line of the greek alphabet, but both are only in the fifth line of the latin alphabet. Were lines existing before alphabet board? Did people use abc as a mnemonic tool before they invented alphabet of a to z or a to t kind, even if juzt a to h the z if it was αβγδεθηζ where η didn't change it's positional number, but θ was mistook for 8, when it was 6
was ζ the Ζ mistaken for 7 when tabooisation of θ began.


θ is naturally an open vulva, an image probably sacred but open for everybody to see. that this is how it all began for each of us.

a book I would like to look into:
I only wish there was a reference section. Lots of information about where the Tarot actually comes from. A good explanation of the symbols on the cards. This book covers the Major Arcana only, up to 11, Justice. Also a really cool pairing of the cards "as they must have been in the Egyptian Temple of Initiation".
Chapters are : 1 - Ancient Tarot Symbolism
2 through 12 are cards 1 - 11
13- false prophet
14- epilogue
15- the mysterious sphinx
16- the magic wand
17- symbols
18- symbolism
that they only look upon 11 cards gave me understanding that they consider other 11 to be inverted forms of the previous 11, but I still need to look into the book itself.
few pages I managed to obtain so far:


These two pages may tell how they paired arcana:
0&1 (Fool&Magus, one is the opposite of the other)
2&21 (High Priestess & The World (are these two the opposites? Magus has to choose who to serve?))
3&20 (The Empress & Resurrection)
4&19 (The Empreror & The Sun)
5&18 (The Heriophant and The Moon)    probably those are not antonyms, but I have to read it to
6&17 (The Lovers and The Star)           understand the principles on which he combined them thus.
7&16 (The Chariot and The Tower)       but chariot and tower can be see as the opposites
8&15 (Strength and The Devil)                is Devil weaknesses?
9&14 (The Hermit and Temperance)     is hermit to the extreme?  bous s both sustain.. of other extreme
10&13 (Wheel of Life and Death)
11&12 (Justice and.. The Hanged Man)    
I can see some opposition in those pairs, as upside down tarot is, read interpreted, as runes are.

What does it give us? Well a work on tarot I could make we have made by somebody else. And he also placed 0 after 21, which is not what I would know, like why? See, have to read it.



even though I have my doubts, also about great and grand being that far apart, I find it fascinating



Here I work on letter to Hans Richter, which contains some tasty bits I leave themn black
See, here is why I need a phone line: you explain it obviously thoroughly, but I get overwhelmed with questions to understand your way of thought. Even though we dig the same subject, we do so from our own unique perspectives and maybe we excavate it on different planes. I try to discover the very origin of the writing systems, thinking of marks of animals (many similar words: in russian when animal pee or poo, it метит which is also "leaves mark" even if a human does it with a chalk on a gate or pen in a notebook, that metit is relative to meaning блиен как же сложно про русский на английском писать. Пиши на руссокм когда про русский речь. И на филипинском когда смеешь что-то про филиппинский отмечать.
And edit is a good invention, I definitely can see what to cut out,



I collect some mail here, for there is a tradition of publishing the artistic and scientific correspondence and here I place quoted lines in smaller font, not of disrespect, but to show their words further in time and in a geographic perspective of second personal pronoun

::::Among the initial ideas I discovered the correlation of the Provencal word “Diéu” for sky-god and the Provencal personal pronoun of the 1st person singular “iéu”.

This one always made sense to me, because of jamaican I&I (the rastafarian personal pronoun Me as in me and god. M is definitely two people holding hands, мы (we (as wir is we(rotated)))  but I got distracted. I&I is me and god, who are one.
It also makes sense in the context of very interesting homonymous antonymy in european personal pronouns: vi is you (not we) in latin and russian, ya is I, not you, and there are plenty of such. My guess is those words were names of the tribes. And names of the tribes could easily be representing the names of their god. And names of the gods have similar homonymous antonymy: god of one tribe was devil of their adversary neighbours. Deva is god in India, but satan in Iran. God is year in russian, but gad is snake. Russian word for god is bog. And if this hypothesis makes sense, it will repeat in the larger range of languages, and if it doesn't, I guess it's just a coincidence.

:::: The Provencal word “Diéu” for the sky-god is related to the Sanskrit sky-god “Diaus” and the Latin sky-god Jupiter “Dious”.

To a layman it will sound wild, but it is an official point of view and is not surprise considering that the languages are taxonomed into the same "family" (a weak concept they teach everybody in arrogant wish to claim they know what is what (japanese has plenty of similar elements as russian, so those are not branches but clouds, abstractions, maps which is not the territory))

::::  As a next step I studied Flinders Petrie's book “The Formation of the Alphabet”, which contains a relatively simple model of the 2-dimensional table of the alphabets

Yes, it is one of few places where humanity even speaks of some planar structure of the alphabet only taught as one-dimensional structure you cannot understand, only memorize.

::::  It had long ago been noticed by Lepsius, Donaldson, and Taylor that, embedded in the Phoenician, Greek, and Italian alphabets there is a repeated sequence of letters,—vowel, labial, guttural, and dental.

I didn't know the "Lepsius, Donaldson, and Taylor" part. I place this piece of dialogue into my journal, I hope you do not mind.
The other one is Ganesh-Vidya, I attach the page from it.

And, surprisingly the one I use is also used by pedagogs who teach heavy autists and paralized people (I attach an example, alphabet board, google it and push images, there are plenty more, and this is one of the main standards)

And it is wild that a man can find Petrie never hearing of those alphabet board, which probably have their own corpus of thought which I never read and only hardly imagine how to find, which demands open access to all the information on everything, available to ai I can work wiht.

::::  This model contained vowel, labial, guttural, and dental, but had a few errors: Flinders Petrie's categories contained “vowels”

Why wouldn't it have them? Vowels are separated from consonants in sanskrit, but who said it came from sanskrit? In my view it could come from anywhere, when linguists pretend they know something about the origin of alphabet they're lying. Today I explore the possibility of Paleo-hispanic being the origin of runes, and from runes came latin, and from latin came greek, and from greek came hebrew, each in line lost some components of the structure as they borrowed them from their neighbours.

::::   the lingual and palatals categories are nissing

Every category except vowels and labials are linguals. Linguals are common area of all those guttural and coronal we imagine, when each of them is impossible without tongue, so tongue is the agent, as lips in labial and neither in vowels (even though o and u are impossible without lips, it is not self-evident, and for ancient people all this fiels was very new, so they naturally missed or ignored some elements of reality to create the classification and systematization of the glyphs, which were already in use: compare arabic vowels looking like all the wrong vowels: their A is like I, their E is like O, their I is like U, their O is like E, their U is like.. their u is vav, it is similar to p, but not as evidently as the arabic letters which I arrogantly call vowels, because of their relative position being the position of vowels in latin alphabet (greek alphabet is much more of a mess: it contains the mess of the latin, and adds its own (second line is much more messy)))

::: I was lucky to find a model with 5 categories labial, guttural, dental, lingual and palatals.

Yes, but here I disagree with how you place them. Why invent order unknown to readers, which by itself raises plenty of questions, which overwhelms and reduce comprehension?
I think you will like work of this guy, who also compares alphabetic sequence with articulatory apparatus: https://roouh.livejournal.com/133411.html


:::: The reconstructed 2-dimensional tables displayed the words DIAUS, DIEU and DIOUS. At this study I knew I had a new insight in linguistics...

Could you describe that insight in one or two sentences? Because I understood it as some words (random to a reader) are up and down in the columns you yourself placed in that order, like why would labial be placed between dental and guttural?

::::  Good night
Good night

In 1920, the first actual known AAC device, the F. Hall Roe Communication Board, was created. Co-developed by F. Hall Roe, who was suffering from Cerebral Palsy, the Communication Board contains letters and words that a person can point to and construct words or sentences. The distribution of such a device was made possible by the Ghora Kahn Grotto Benevolent Society.
but that board wasn't in the order origins of which I was searchin, and now I'm hopeful that I can trace the origin of that other one in the texts on reforms in aac devices.


aac, nurse communication board, Communication Board for Individuals With Disabilities, but why am I looking for their origin? So I hope to find the author and then I will loiik for his or her papers, where may be the history of the question further into the outside of that field.

and my idea was to look up all th e sites containing images like
because if there's the history of them, they contain such image, and I was correct:
I found somebody with that weird name on linkedin, I sent him the request about the origin of the order, if he saw it somewhere, hopefully he'll answer, probably I should dig more for another opinion of the origin of the board and other ways to connect contact the guy.

I kept on looking, and this one gave me understanding of which letters are more important than others:
So I digged some more, and I found few other leads:


I think I'll email those four individuals with the question of whether they know the origin of this order.

I sent letters to Richard Hurtig and the John M Costello.
Lisa Bardach I found is too young to be the guy.
Unfortunately David Beukelman died over 22 months ago.



death metal is weapon (and as a musical genre it is пушка (пушка пугает (пулять пылать)))


Dimentional structures of alphabet. Is the subject I'm in. It should be the title of my dissertation.
    I must make it a dissertation to do all I can for promoting this work, so it is not in vain.


 י ה ו ה
is technically trigrammaton י ה ו [его?]
и e u the descending triad it is, and ה being A in these three.



бита(битая) и бито(битое) активный и пассивный залог. Проверим это


earn and own look so differently (though, first vowel, last n) but sound so similarly,.. ERE ᚱ~ᚢ!


Thinking of runes, the same symbols in hungary norway and psyberia, oh russian culture you're insane.
Thinkin of how runes read differently in different languages, which may indicate that they are some words, different in different languages and congatic in similar ones. Thus russian and latin read most of the letters the same. And can this hypothetic азбука reveal the meanings of the letters?
Petuh Ruster Рустер
пентух от слова петь, ртом! but I don't know english enough to take some roar word from the top of my hat head and hat cognatы

rooster похоже что означает птицу садящуюся на насест (roost (хвоРОСТина? бROOS?))
Relax, (it was an automatic wiriting)


Моя жизнь могла быть лучше, но я глубже (глуп же (deep~dumb?))



Pentagrammaton is actually another name for Jesus (and indeed Jesus is five letters)
I think I brought this image before, what I didn't notice then is that it says יהשוה which is יהוה with ש inside of it, and what would jews think of that? especially since ש is tooth, but if it's fire, than also what is it? the very essence of יהוה or what? It's open for interpretation. But then is it not yeʃua, but yeʃue?
And isn't יהוה yeve the Eve, and isn't it Jovi? Is Jupiter father of the jews? Is jew je, the personal pronoun corresponding to an ancient tribe?

That יהשוה reminds יְשִׁיבָה‎, even though literally they're quite different, יהשוה is read by g as ехашо́
ישו [е́шу́] which is much closer to יְשִׁיבָה‎ [ешива́]
g.t. doesn't recognize יהשוה the way it is in this context, but translates it as will compare (but I do not know knebrew hebrew to confirm)
But then why is it here? It is chronologically very late, much later than the origin of alphabet:
The first ones to use the name of Jesus something like "Yahshuah" were Renaissance occultists. In the second half of the 16th century, when knowledge of Biblical Hebrew first began to spread among a significant number of Christians, certain esoterically minded or occultistic circles came up with the idea of deriving the Hebrew name of Jesus by adding the Hebrew letter shin ש into the middle of the Tetragrammaton divine name yod-he-waw-he יהוה to produce the form yod-he-shin-waw-he יהשוה.
This was given a basic Latin transliteration JHSVH or IHSVH or IHSUH (since there was no letter "W" or sh / [š] sound in Latin, and "I" and "J" were then not yet clearly distinguished as letters of the alphabet, nor were "U" and "V"). This could then be supplied with further vowels for pronounceability. By coincidence, the first three letters of this consonantal transcription IHSVH, etc. were identical with the old IHS/JHS monogram of the name of Jesus (from Greek iota-eta-sigma).
In Renaissance occultist works, this pentagrammaton (or five-letter divine name) was frequently arranged around a mystic pentagram, where each of the five Hebrew letters י ה ש ו ה was placed at one of the points (the letter shin ש was always placed at the upward-pointing vertex of the pentagram).[2] One of the earliest attested examples of this diagram is in the Calendarium Naturale Magicum Perpetuum or "Magical Calendar" (published 1620 but dated 1582)[3] of either Theodor de Bry (Flemish-born German, 1528–1598) or Matthäus Merian the Elder (Swiss, 1593–1650).[4] The idea of the pentagrammaton was funneled into modern occultism by 19th-century French writer Eliphas Levi and the influential late 19th-century Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. The Golden Dawn favored the consonantal transcription IHShVH or YHShVH, and the pronunciation Yeheshuah.
In Hebrew and Aramaic, the name "Jesus"/"Yeshua" appears as yod-shin-waw-`ayin יֵשׁוּעַ Yeshua and as the longer form of the same name, yod-he-waw-shin-`ayin יְהוֹשֻׁעַ‎‎ "Joshua"/"Yehoshua". The letter `ayin ע was pronounced as a voiced pharyngeal consonant sound in ancient Hebrew and Aramaic, as opposed to the pronounced [h] sound or a silent Hebrew letter he ה.
But it plays with the concepts I introduced into this research. And the concepts are deep as can be, so I collect everything of potential value, regardless if everything of the quoted text is correct or not.

A pentagram (sometimes known as a pentalpha, pentangle, or star pentagon) is a regular five-pointed star polygon, formed from the diagonal line segments of a convex (or simple, or non-self-intersecting) regular pentagon. Drawing a circle around the five points creates a similar symbol referred to as the pentacle,[1] which is used widely by Wiccans and in paganism, or as a sign of life and connections. The word "pentagram" refers only to the five-pointed star, not the surrounding circle of a pentacle.
Pentagrams were used symbolically in ancient Greece and Babylonia. Christians once commonly used the pentagram to represent the five wounds of Jesus.
The word pentagram comes from the Greek word πεντάγραμμον (pentagrammon),[2] from πέντε (pente), "five" + γραμμή (grammē), "line".[3] The word pentagram refers to just the star and the word pentacle refers to the star within a circle, although there is some overlap in usage.[4] The word pentalpha is a 17th-century revival of a post-classical Greek name of the shape.[5]

It is not some random stuff, I brought it here because the word alpha is present in pentalpha, and they say it is a greek name of that shape, and it correlates with the pentagram-like shape of A, so are there betta in some other polygram? But no, this loose end leads nowhere. Or does it?
From Ancient Greek πένταλφα (péntalpha), from πέντε (pente) and ἄλφα (alpha), five alphas. So called for its resemblance to five alphas superimposed at different rotations.


Hygieia is a goddess from Greek mythology (also referred to as: Hygiea or Hygeia; /haɪˈdʒiːə/;[1] Ancient Greek: Ὑγιεία or Ὑγεία, Latin: Hygēa or Hygīa). Hygieia is a goddess of health (Greek: ὑγίεια – hugieia[2]), cleanliness and hygiene. Her name is the source for the word "hygiene".
Hygieia is related to the Greek god of medicine, Asclepius, who is the son of the Olympian god Apollo. Hygieia is most commonly referred to as a daughter of Asclepius[3] and his wife Epione. Hygieia and her four sisters each performed a facet of Apollo's art: Hygieia (health, cleanliness, and sanitation); Panacea (universal remedy); Iaso (recuperation from illness); Aceso (the healing process); and Aegle (radiant good health).

"Hugieia" (ύγιεία: health) was used as a greeting among the Pythagoreans.
It's weird how they spell it wrong in spite of the pentagram spelling it.. ύγιεία.. it is how it spells it, the right bottom figure is not Η, but dygraph of ει.



A B C [a б g]
I Mw NΛ [i w n] as an example
U F X [u f h]

b  d
p  q


p  q
b  d

E  ж  З
И m N

but I do not see such symmetry in other lines, only that A reminds Д and O reminds Q which fits the

so pbd and pq are the EЗ- and ИN-like reflections?
bdEЗИNpq? It doesn't make sense, unless they're two different pre-alphabetic structures..

From Ancient Greek πένταλφα (péntalpha), from πέντε (pente) and ἄλφα (alpha), five alphas. So called for its resemblance to five alphas superimposed at different rotations. makes me think of western greek form of A↙︎drawn large

Oscan is fascinating particularly in it having a R-like glyph for D and D-like glyph for R. They're mirrored, but then so is B and E and C the G, and their V looks like ..well, ב, but I saw such b in a table of some more obscure writing systems, I cannot find them now. Or maybe I just poorly remembered that oscan F? But ב is just what? I found it by accident looking through my collection of fonts, I didn't link those two memories. I do now. And thus IOO recognize


That typo of IOO tells me of Io, name of god and possible reading of י ה ו ה
another reading of י ה ש ו ה  is Eve. And it is spectacular that Eve and Io are both female deities mythologic figures (before Eve was just a creature of God, it probably was the Great Mother, the ultimate goddess of the ancient people. It's later we speculated ourselves higher causes and did them all wrong, but those ancient representations are haunting my mind to this day, even though I'm mostly atheistic and materialistic, recognizing yet some thinner planes or rather spaces within the rude figures we call bodies, and those thinner wavefields create some complex life within itself. Speculating about the world I can do it the way guys who created alphabet thought. Both being smart white autists, we naturally share the culture, even though in its different periods. And because we keep on having records since those days, I suspect the good pieces to be repeated over and over in our narratives (only some powerful ai can tell after reading everything of the matter)


That typo, IOO, reminds me of Io being both italian first person personal pronoun and name of a deity
Je is I in french and reminds Jah a lot. But then was io and Io in latin at the same time? Are french Jamaican? What is Jah? Jovi! Jupiter (father of jews? how old is the subversion?)

The Lepontic from the table above is different than this:
                     

Let's add other examples of this group: Umbrian (7th century to the 1st century BC)


Faliscan (7th and 2nd centuries BC)


North Picene (North Picene was spoken in the central-eastern Italy. It is known from four inscriptions which date from the 1st millenium BC, and consist of just 60 words. It was written with a version of the Old Italic alphabet, and therefore the words can be read. However their meanings remain a mystery. One of the inscriptions is known to come from the Servici Cemetry in Novilara, a village near Pesaro in the region of Marche. The other inscriptions are thought to come from the same place, however their archaeological provenance is uncertain. It is thought that the inscriptions date from about 650 BC. (right to left in horizontal lines))

So how did they transliterated them if the meaning is a mistery? They just recognized the old italic alphabet in that, the d as Я is spectacular, the D~R link enforced by it. And look at faliscan, that symbol is A there, which enforces the hypothesis of A~D affinity.


South Picene:  (South Picene is an extinct Italic language that was spoken in east central Italy in the Marche and Abruzzo regions. The language is thought to be part of the Osco-Umbrian group of Italic languages. South Picene is also referred to as Mid-Adriatic or Paleo-Sabellic.
There are 23 known inscriptions on stone and bronze in the South Picene alphabet, which date from between the 6th and 4th centuries BC. The alphabet resembles the southern Etruscan alphabet. Most of the inscriptions are on grave stones, but some are on statues)


Remember that because they don't mention found abecedaries, the alphabetic order is unknown, here they're just arranged along the etruscan abecedary (whether that one.. Marsiliana.. is genuine or not I know not, but then what do they matter, initially I wanted to make it basing my focus solely on modern state of alphabet, because people who kept the tradition alive must have known something so they did it just right, such was an assumption, and then I was pushed into the obscurity of the antiquity by the critics who were harsh but just as they thought, but they were quick to attack, they just dissipated when I started answering their questions, but then not that time, that time got me and I have absorbed tons of ancient material, and who knows how authentic that material was.  See, I attack the world, the world attacks me back.

Notice that in the South Picene that ב-like shape is recognized not as f, but as v
their f is just :, like what was going on there? ᛙ is t, not m, which is funny, since russian т is т

So, old-italic stage is how old the runic tradition is, and just because norsk ruine runes were in use later, doesn't mean they're of some later tradition, because the tradition of runes preserved in norsk territories is deeper than alphabetic tradition we know. As I wrote in that letter, borrowers lost some elements of the borrwoed rwriting system, they didn't add heresies to it, they deemed heresies what they didn't know. By authoritarian hierarchy, not by some meritocracy.

Some more oscan:

Oscan was an Italic language spoken in southern Italy between about the 5th and 1st centuries BC. It was spoken by the Samnites, Aurunci (Ausones) and the Sidicini in the in Samnium, Campania, Lucania and Abruzzo. After the territory occupied by the Oscans was conquered by Rome in the first century AD, the Oscan language and culture disappeared.
Oscan was related to Latin and Umbrian, and is known from a number of inscriptions. It was written with the Latin and Greek alphabets, and with its own alphabet, which was adapted from the Etruscan alphabet sometime in the 7th century BC.

They say right to left in horizontal lines
but then why does that metal plane looks like it goes from right to left?

 

A terracotta marker with an Oscan inscription and stamps showing a helmeted Athena and a boar. This marker was found in a tomb near Capua in Italy and dates from 300-250 BC. The inscription reads "VIRIIUM VESULLIA[IS] DEIVIN[AIS], 'of the Virrii family for the divine festival of the Vesulias'. Such stamps appear on currency, and may devote gifts of money by the Virri family.
 
 If the images are vertical like this, doesn't it tell that oscan went in columns?

Then that other artefact could be read like this:
In the 5th century BC, Latin was just one of many Italic languages spoken in central Italy. Latin was the language of the area known as Latium (modern Lazio), and Rome was one of the towns of Latium. The earliest known inscriptions in Latin date from the 6th century BC and were written using an alphabet adapted from the Etruscan alphabet.




During the 15th century, Latin began to lose its dominant position as the main language of scholarship and religion throughout Europe. It was largely replaced by written versions of the vernacular languages of Europe, many of which are descendants of Latin or have been heavily influenced by it.
Modern Latin was used by the Roman Catholic Church until the mid 20th century and is still used to some extent, particularly in the Vatican City, where it is one of the official languages. Latin terminology is used extensively by biologists, palaeontologists and other scientists to name species and specimens, and also by doctors and lawyers.
A few schools teach Classical Latin as a spoken language, and there are currently maybe 100 or so people who speak it fluently.


(mirror)

Pelasgians (the ones from whom greeks actually took their writing, though the querstion remains if that was not the previous one, the Linear B or something) are Philistine, can you believe it! And those are Palestinians. Fucking hell!)))
but this is no laughing matter
The English term Philistine comes from Old French Philistin; from Classical Latin Philistinus; from Late Greek Philistinoi; ultimately from Hebrew Pəlištī (פְּלִשְׁתִּי; plural Pəlištīm, פְּלִשְׁתִּים), meaning 'people of Pəlešeṯ (פְּלֶשֶׁת)'; and there are cognates in Akkadian Palastu and Egyptian Palusata;[6] the term Palestine has the same derivation.[7] The native Philistine endonym is unknown.

But then what modern palestinians have to do with those palestinians? Palestine is just the roman province, what ethnicities inhabit it is not constant. Currently palestinians are arabs who invaded that place and slaughtered whoever lived there before them. Probably this is one of the most common means to "assimilate" the substrate of whatever you conquer.
Rabbinic sources state that the Philistines of Genesis were different people from the Philistines of the Deuteronomistic history (the series of books from Joshua to 2 Kings)

but that book keeps on delivering:

I didn't know Linear A was translated. What are they talking about? The work seems legit though.

:I'm confused
Linear A is a writing system that was used by the Minoans of Crete from 1800 to 1450 BC to write the hypothesized Minoan language or languages. Linear A was the primary script used in palace and religious writings of the Minoan civilization. It was succeeded by Linear B, which was used by the Mycenaeans to write an early form of Greek. It was discovered by archaeologist Sir Arthur Evans in 1900. No texts in Linear A have yet been deciphered.

The term linear refers to the fact that the script was written using a stylus to cut lines into a tablet of clay, as opposed to cuneiform, which was written by using a stylus to press wedges into the clay.

Linear alphabets are composed of lines on a surface, such as ink on paper.

Загадка русской Ѱ (она косая (бухая))

Thank you everybody.

which reminds that ц and k are c

as 子 and 手 both look and sound in chinese. ц and ш

In Chinese numerology, the number is considered to be lucky and is often displayed in shop windows and neon signs.[25][26] In China, 666 can mean "everything goes smoothly" (the number six has the same pronunciation as the character 溜, which means "smooth".[27]

but if all you have is a hammer..

If they wanted to place alphabet into it, they'd do a better job. But what if they only knew some elements, and placed them in alphabetic order, which was broken when more elements were found?
I still doubt it, and as I said, for all I have is the hammer, everything looks like a nail.

A       
BC      
DEF     
GHIMN

glory him!?
or was it a sequence of holy names?
a-be ce def(us) G Him
That HIM we get if we place M next to I, as am to I.
is him he'm? he am? he be
(aM~Be. And what about aM~iS? M and S meet in M~Ϻ, ᛘ~ᛉ, ma~she, and some more was in this voluyme)

tens~tons, tens~thousands
zehner~tausende

IV in the box, Ч-like 4 in the right side.
IIII barred as roman numerals are barred above and below.

I Bi Ti    (e v z)
A Ba Ta   (o p t)  
U Bu Tu   (u f s)  
and the last line demands a b d on top, thus o is not ⴰ anymore, but.. Ω of a kind, past T
before that line they probably were
I Bi Ti
O Bo Do
(two ways to shape your mouth)
B is lips
D is tongue
                  I  Fi  Ti? I  Fi  Гi?
   O Bo Do

                

-sis. a suffix appearing in loanwords from Greek, where it was used to form from verbs abstract nouns of
action, process, state, condition, etc.: thesis; aphesis.

This particular order is obviously relative to latin alphabet and such, but wha..
it definitely had some complicated history from the moment of separation from it:
it may tell of labiality or R, as if it was a farting sound, as if очко is маленькое око,
которое однокоренно слову около (у кола? (и у хуя и место укола))

Nor does g.t. know those hentaispellings

clatter

(see the chess figure knight, it is a horsehead)

Let's make it easier to tell by looking up more kn words.

knives have v which is in in russian, so that click tells the piercing of skin
knot has t, which could be to, whihc tells that knot adjusts ropes to trees and such
but what is kn in knot? probably of know (you have to know hte the knot)
knee (по форме кости, похожей на копыто? patella(kneecap)patella reminds horsehoof)

but maybe he just may as mwell

 indeed mutually intelligible.

see what comes out of this assumption
(letters naturally were short words, even if not assigned as such by the inventor,
seen like that by public)
So my task is to find those words, and I am optimistic about the outcome, because words that basal must be rather universal, at least amongst the indo-european canon, and yes I dare to claim that whites invent almost everything, at least almost everything in the european culture to which alphabets belong.

but that doesn't have such a pair, unless it is hat or head in some weird semantic play
those are hose? hat and hose can identify him, but I dunno, it seems way too weird.

is knight the one to whom you have to knock before entering or the one who knocks
but nah, that kn of him is most probably of конь (but and that may indicate that domestication of horses happened amongst slavs before it was adopted by the ancestors of the brits)

(also will)

правила

(лень переводить, русская филология, уай ууд ай кэр)

р is vowel in spelling of care as кэр
in english re is reaв ф read as a, for it is are
is re in care even are? c is what?
Should I compare care and bear? Does spelling metter? Not more than how it is read.

:ending with a last letter

ли?

but on is на

is khrustchev's boot our churchill's victory sign?

(кто беспокоится те и родители)

or heard

Interesting and natural that earth is B, female. And the sky is J, male, mail. female~fu_mail(без_кольчуги) ?

male ~ mail (самец~кольчуга? в принципе, мужчине кольчуба больше к лицу, но этимология ли это? едва ли, но всё может быть)

I wish I don't take these thoughsts (on от слова sought, thought~sought
thust sink seek is think, and sink is to delve into the depth of one's mind)

Then I may not paint

I don't believe it, I think so,
which is maybe, maybe not.
While belief is fo shu.
But those two can be distinguished differently:
thinking is on some basis, believing is mostly blind.

But no! t is double s! according to weisse being white.

so sofits were not used for numerals, they show how they could make bigger numbers with less letters.
four being the maximal singular numeral in hundreds (hundreds show combinatorial approach) reminds me of 4 being the V in the protoroman numeral system, of IVXLCD adding up to 365
was it taken as the year goes in spiral by 5 degrees higher each time? that would explain the leap luft

redden?

It would make it 7 per aet. or 5 in some of them, because two runes repeat.
Listen, I want to buy that poster, I want to buy that course.
Or rather I want to read it. I doubt I can buy from nazi russia in late 2023.

of his, which is G

If it is legit I have no idea, but it has some new ideas. Two aettirs of icelandic runes, some shapes unknown to me, So what I recognize as ᛍ reminds me of Ⱄ and the idea of some connection between norsk runes and glagolitic script should have come to me sooner, copnsdisdering the geographic proximity and that Ⰰ often doesn't have such long sleeves and then it looks pretty much like ᚐ the ᛆ

Whatever is the final in icelandic is doesn't seem to be in unicode yet

Well, the other part is legit, so whatever man.
Can I be suire of icelandic though?
I will place it tio the maybe deoartnebt.

It's like there is a finite ammount of humans, but
a) I will never meet them all and
b) they keep on coming

Good Morning

legendary 15

and we russians write it exactly like that in our cursive school copybooks

and that it goes from the bottom up, like runes did.
ᚲ is it?
С is russian S

oh, no, my bad, it doesn't, he doesn't list ᛦ

Argh, you got me, let's look at it unbiased (even though guys who take it seriously arre all clueless)

And what if it's the best like this,
because the end of the paragraph shows what is the next line,
 it mirrors it.

It looks weird.

Also today I found a cool ArtIst

    Udmurt (Votyak)
    Komi (Zyryan)
    Permyak (Komi-Permyak)
    Yazva (Komi-Yazva)