I expect this log to start lagging in these 49 days, so that I live 49 years when this book reaches full 49 volumes. Like what were the chances? What were the chances

So I prepare to both scenarios: But I'm not prepared to death at all. I played big, and yet I forgot of the time limit I chose. Can I rechoose.
(each paragraph is a separate thought, they're not chaos, they're thoughts, good and so-so)
A is not Ace, that is the conspiracy of assholes: as, but, assist, rebuttal, analyze, заднеязычные.
(they insert such shame at different parts of languages, but in all languages they have influence at, and that's a lot (but this is the worst type of conspiracy theories: speculation))

A is one. A.

2 is beth?
3 is daleth!
4 is е
5 is z
6 is G
7 is Z!?
8 is H (𓎛)
9 is j
10 is I all over the globe. First of al;l in hebrew. In latin I is 9 nIn [nain (I is ai)]
11 eleven.. I'm trippin..     Θ is 8.. or is it nine? 9 is g
ΘgH
abcd        1234
efZΘgH   5678910?
Did drift in numerals (from octal to decimal) influence the letters too!
ABCD
EFGH  thise are octave. H~A! Did they continue to write the next octave with other letters of the alphabet. Musical Notation! I thought we were speaking of numbers.
Alphabet are three (mothers! matters! math, myth/mysl, mus) in one (a i u tell that such is the direction of the three. Math came first, we counted things in writing tens of millenia before we could discuss or even describe things in writing)

IKLMN seems to be the semi-decimal line,
OPRST then is the other one. And it seems some wanted to introduce even larger musical mode.

Probably both are pentatonica. Was it quadrophonia or what would you call it. After triad comes tetrad! Wow, pythagoras tetraktis after trikits triktis. tetraktis is before pentanotic mode (or is it scale?)

abcd
iгзч would make better would make a better 1234
iгзчs is how hindu alphabet goes, but s seems to be out of order. ч is джь? for г and з are voiced.
четыре and four are very voiceless. четы~fou? фу ~ чё ты? и слово и словосочетание могут быть взаимозаменяемы, смысл один и тот же. Удивительно, да? four is foul? фу. but in chinese it's shi.
The She? San or Mi, not Three. She is not Four. Different languages. Why though. Numerals they all know them. Why are they differently named? I think that letters may be read differently because different words are started with them in them. Could the same be the case for numbers?

Could numbers and letters be the same thing? And they were. Now we have two ways to look at them. Numerals have readings and the graphical side. Letters do too. If letter sounds.. mi and ni are syllables and numerals at the same time. But i for one is not in kana. but it's in latin and greek, dafuq!

Very raw meat in the two previous paragraphs. Yet not grey because it drives into something interesting. Numerals and letters. As the same phenomenon. Becan G Began in syllables.

Because names are memorized better than ideas of theirs, it could be the other way around too:
Names are what we have to memorize. A name tells nothing of a man. That's why we focus on it. Or maybe we focus on them because a tree isn't offended when we do not remember its name.

A   B   C   D
E    F  GH
I         JK   L M N
O    P    Q   R S T
U VW   XY Z

In the centre of it all, JK

XYZ are greek letters

A   B   C   D
E    F  GH
I         JK   L M N
O    P    Q   R S T
   V

A   B   C   D
E    F  GH
I         JK   L M N
O    P    Q   R S T V Isn't M there to give birth to W? both U and V, both vowel and labial. And we borrowed linguals from greeks. We romans, duh.

The position of Θ may tell that it's linual:

A   B   C   D
E    F  GH Θ?
I         JK   L M N
O    P    Q   R S T V

but isn't it

ΑΒΓΔ
ΕΖΗΘ
ΙΚΛΜΝΞ
ΟΠΡΣΤ
ΥΦΧΨΩ

so why not

ΑΒΓΔ
ΕΖΗΘ
ΙΚΛΜΝΞ
ΟΠΡΣΤ
ΥΦΧΨΩ    ?

because it's out of order.
they say it was

ΑΒΓΔ
ΕϜΖΗΘ
ΙΚΛΜΝΞ
ΟΠϚΡΣΤ
ΥΦΧΨΩϠ so clumsy.

of
ΑΒΓΔΕϜΖΗΘ
ΙΚΛΜΝΞΟΠϚ
ΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩϠ

the three letters, one per each row (and did Ϝ replace Θ not to stand obviously the last in the line as the other two?)
Russians borrowed θ as Ф, russians didn't distinguish much between Ѳ and Ф. No regulations were present, they used only one or only the other, and maybe in some periods they used them both. But that's not for sure, the first one I read somewhere and the second one I only vaguely remember.

So, looking at that mess, it is clear that those who created alphabet had different numeral system in mind. Θ would be 8?

Why these speculations. Let's party and let the revelations come by themselves.



A team of archaeologists from the Cambridge Theban Tombs Project, led by Nigel Strudwick, discovered the inscribed piece of limestone in 1995 in a tomb that belonged to an Egyptian official named Sennefer, and recently Schneider studied and deciphered it. While the text is written in hieratic — a form of Egyptian hieroglyphic writing — "all [the] words appear to be of foreign linguistic origin" and are mostly Semitic, wrote Schneider in his paper.

One side of the limestone piece contains a series of Egyptian hieroglyphic symbols that represent the words "bibiya-ta" (a word that can mean "earth snail"), "garu" (a word that can mean "dove") and "da'at" (a word that can mean "kite"), Schneider wrote in his paper. More than 3,000 years ago, the "g" would have represented the sound that "c" does today, Schneider told Live Science. This means that the first letter of each of these words is the ancient equivalent of "BCD." [Photos: 5,000-Year-Old Hieroglyphs Discovered in Sinai Desert]
And this is pretty much why I brought it here. There it says that B was the first letter. But where do they read? Isn't they reading the second line? The bi bi sequence is there, and it is modern cursive hebrew ב, only it's reversed. Just like 𓃀 to be
The previous word can easily be the A-word. But then that ostracon as if ostracized further, the upper piece is so shart, could it not be chipped off in millenia? Just buried somewhere, they do not decay for no reason. Not fall off  due to gravity. What am I saying, I know nothing of these things.
And what is the last line? Here we can see four to five lines (the first one could be the title)
But no, there certainly was an image, above the bug.



“The script is known as hieratic and is not problematic; the spelling of the words is, however, unusual,” Dr. Haring wrote in e-mail to Ancient Origins. “The first word is probably hy-hnw, ‘to rejoice’ (read from right to left), with the figure of a rejoicing man (itself also a hieratic character) at the far left.
“The problem is thus not the script, but the spellings, and the interpretation of some words on the ostracon remains highly uncertain. What is not uncertain, however, is the order of the initial consonants in the first four lines: hlhm. Alphabetic ordering indicates alphabetic awareness, and the signs in the left column may very well have been used as alphatic characters.”
So the fourth is M, and probably mi, like are chinese and japanese using a 5000 year old glyph? and water the mizu.
The other side of the inscribed piece of limestone also contains a series of Semitic words written in hieratic, Schneider said. They spell out the words "hahāna lāwī ḥelpat mayyin leqab." The first letters of the first four words in that series — the letters "hlhm" — represent the first few letters of another ancient alphabetic sequence, one that never became as popular as the ancient forerunner to our alphabet.

These words form a phrase that means, "to make pleasant the one who bends reed, water [according] to the Qab." The "qab" is a unit of measurement that equals about 1.2 liters, Schneider wrote. This phrase likely helped the person who wrote this inscription to remember the first few letters of this alphabetic sequence, Schneider said.
The phrase is so stupid I wonder if they translated it acccurately. And they themselves say that spelling of some words is weird:
«the spelling of the words is, however, unusual,” Dr. Haring wrote in e-mail to Ancient Origins.»
that can be explained by this:
«"all [the] words appear to be of foreign linguistic origin" and are mostly Semitic, wrote Schneider in his paper.»
Not only russians have oreshkins, who read some ancient writings from russian perspective.


"bibiya-ta" (a word that can mean "earth snail") букашка (жук же нарисован (bug))
"garu" (a word that can mean "dove") голубь (garu не похоже на dove, но похоже на голубь)
"da'at" (a word that can mean "kite") коршун, bird of prey.
and this sequence could depict how one eats the other. And this translation could be more to the point.

-

арёл
сову
синичку
именно такой порядок в 𓄿𓅓𓅱 А! Ум! and синичка is si. I heard it speaking and it's no u
    Арёл Варона Снегирь? так оно в русском было бы?
А̊рёл Филин Соловей

In hindi owl is ullú, उल्लू
In hindi the diacritic of low is below. In arabic it's above. So arabs place diacritic below for what in Europe we consider high. In Indo-Euopean.
Can it relate to what the two meganations consider good and bad?


⋮    The character "⋮". An ellipsis (three dots) vertically aligned. It is sometimes used to communicate the continuation of a list vertically as opposed to horizontally. It is also a mathematic notation which means "is divisible by" or "is a multiple of".

This wandering through my collection of glyphs brought me a treasure:  ּ
HEBREW POINT DAGESH OR MAPIQ or shuruk        Diacritical mark
    dagesh, used to denote a geminated consonant (dagesh khazak or dagesh forte), or a consonant pronounced as a plosive as opposed to as a fricative (dagesh kal or dagesh lene).
    mappiq or mapiq, used to indicate that the letters ה or א are to be pronounced as consonants in positions where they usually indicate a vowel.
    shuruk sign, used with ו to indicate the long u vowel sound.

Asked Grok to elaborate on that previous line of hebrew letters playing like matres lectiones, and it insists that ע is not, and especially not ع, but here it gives me a perfect example where it is: عين /ʕayn/ eye
I suspect that weird concept of glottal stops and glottal fricatives is maintained to preserve the disgusting semitic pronunciation of those letters. All those vomiting sounds.


трут-глагол и трут-существительное как одно слово (со времён получения огня трением или от слова труха подобной опилкам как результату трения)



Emma
The name Emma is of Germanic origin, meaning "whole" or "universal". It likely originated as a short form of names containing the element "ermen" or "irmen" (strength), such as Ermengarde or Ermentrude. The first known use of the name in written sources is Emma of Austrasia, a Frankish woman.
I saw em of hebrew and ma of english. Universal mother? Ani and Me

n and m know we and even asians.
n is ni, ニ, 二
m is mi, ミ, 三

l is el (one and only)
le is el (depends on language: Grok tells both come from ille, shortened it differently)

I~l N M O (O~٥)

٠ ١ ٢ ٣ ٤ ٥ ٦ ٧ ٨ ٩

٤ is Ξ

ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ

٦ ~ П ~ 𐌐 (cursive p is Г-like (with wave instead of the upper bar)
Interesrting, isn't it, П is for пара, double Т, and yet

٧ ٨ ٩ are great for r s t as the final set.  And letters before I are also ten (or nine? a b g d e v z h θ is the most I can give (though ugaritic has five letters in first line)

𐎀a 𐎁b 𐎂c 𐎃ḫ 𐎄d 𐎅h(e) 𐎆w 𐎇z 𐎈ḥ 𐎉θ 𐎊и 𐎋k
𐎌 š 𐎍l 𐎎m 𐎏 ḏ 𐎐(𐎃 rotated 90°)n 𐎑 ẓ 𐎒s 𐎓ʿ(ɔ) 𐎔п 𐎕ṣ 𐎖q 𐎗r
𐎘ṯ 𐎙ġ 𐎚t
          𐎛ỉ 𐎜 ủ 𐎝s̀

𐎀a 𐎁b 𐎂c 𐎃ḫ 𐎄d                                                         5
𐎅h(e) 𐎆w 𐎇z 𐎈ḥ 𐎉θ                                                  5
𐎊и 𐎋k 𐎌 š 𐎍l 𐎎m 𐎏 ḏ 𐎐(𐎃 rotated 90°)n 𐎑 ẓ 𐎒s   7
𐎓ʿ(ɔ) 𐎔п 𐎕ṣ 𐎖q 𐎗r 𐎘ṯ 𐎙ġ 𐎚t                                      8
𐎛ỉ 𐎜 ủ 𐎝s̀                                                                   3

I looked into it before, speculating of whether it was 25 of 5×5

If they were five pentatonic "octaves" what would it be "sexaves"
In pentatonic scales, the term "intervals" is often used instead of "octaves" to describe the distances between notes, as pentatonic scales consist of five notes per octave and focus on specific intervals (e.g., major second, minor third) rather than the full octave span of a diatonic scale. However, the term "octave" itself is still used to describe the doubling of frequency (e.g., from C to C), so context matters. If referring to the scale's structure, "intervals" or "steps" is more common.

𐎀a 𐎁b 𐎂c 𐎃ḫ 𐎄d 𐎅h(e) 𐎆w 𐎇z 𐎈ḥ 𐎉θ 𐎊и 𐎋k                              12
𐎌 š 𐎍l 𐎎m 𐎏 ḏ 𐎐(𐎃 rotated 90°)n 𐎑 ẓ 𐎒s 𐎓ʿ(ɔ) 𐎔п 𐎕ṣ 𐎖q 𐎗r    10 (12? but what's the proof?)
𐎘ṯ 𐎙ġ 𐎚t                                                                                           3
          𐎛ỉ 𐎜 ủ 𐎝s̀                                                                              3
as on that tablet goes places A M Ṯ at the beginning of the lines, and that Ṯ is not the T which follows soon and that makes it even closer to ש of אמש


Did I found some magic? ABC-like texts to make them basic as abc

I'm an ultrazionist. I want all jews into Israel.
a) because they're really naughty, and something is to be done about it. And this way maybe they stop annoying other nations and thus we have a bigger chance of avoiding the total holocoast.
b) because that's the way to summon mochiah. And though only believers believe that, atheists may get satisfied with the other reasons; and this one should be real big for everyone who believes.
c) because maybe concentrating their brainpower in the nation state may make them deliver something fascinating, something for which they can be proud, to transform their хитрость into мудрость
isn't nazi is zion reversed in a way?


A a a α
B b Б б V β              V~twofingersmyfirend (fire~pyre (the guy with whom you will be burnt))
C Ц Ч S T g g γ        g~დ
D d დ Δ g Д д δ       Δ дом    D дверь    d ?    დ~g

E e ε
F f Ф ф φ
G g g Г γ
H h Х х η 
I i И и η
J j Ж
К k к
L l Л Λ
M м m μ
N n Н н ν
ξ
О ο
P p П π
R r Р р ρ
S s ſ C σ/ς Σ
T t т τ
U u У у υ
V Ф ф F f φ
X χ x (as W w, nothing to tell of that. but differently: W is just not in any other script)
ψ and is it W? because it looks pretty much like that. And so does ω. And both are unique in greek.
Z.. wait. ψ also looks like ψ, and that's the letter I missed.
Y y й ψ Ψ ?
Z З ω ζ

З ω Е m

E m З ω is more alphabetic. With ω belonging to the next line, just as ЕFГI do
E m З ω is cross-cut of A M S and ω is unique for greek, latin ends with З
E M З as three phases of the SUN!!! SUZ (SoλνZe)
A M Z actually. A is read as e? and it is correct? as in pan? as in base. bass.
A and if it's base, B a C?

or should I compare only by alphabetic position? Alphabetic positions change, and I have no interest in such mundane mechanical work.


two fingers ~ my friends
V (вы, peace)
W (we, war (вы и вы, разделил, создал две стороны этим словом
V is for singular Вы
W is for plural вы.


I V X L C D


In Hesiod's Theogony, the Charites are the three daughters of Zeus: Aglaea ("Splendor"), Euphrosyne ("Joy"), and Thalia ("Good Cheer"), by the Oceanid Eurynome.[5] The identical genealogy is given by Apollodorus.[6] The same three names are also given by Pindar, with a possible reference to their "father" Zeus and no mother mentioned.[7] Although the Charites were usually considered to be Zeus' daughters and three in number, their names as well as their parentage and number varied.[8] Homer mentions Pasithea as "one of the youthful Graces",[9] and perhaps has "Charis" (the singular form of "Charites"), as the name of another,[10] but does not give their parentage, number, or any other of their names.[11]

The geographer Pausanias gives other variations, some regional.[12] He says that, according to Boeotian tradition, Eteocles, the king of Orchomenus, established three as the number of Charites, but that the Athenians and Spartans worshipped only two. For the Athenians the two Charites were Auxo and Hegemone, while for the Spartans they were Cleta and Phaenna.[13] Also, according to Pausanias, the Hellenistic poet Hermesianax said that Peitho ("Persuasion") was one of the Charites, and the poet Antimachus said that the Charites were the "daughters of Aegle and the Sun [Helios]".[14]



Isn't to serve a synonym of to slave? To enslave is the word I was thinking of. But then isn't thrall is the synonym to enthrall and enthral?!
But though it's a nice mindplay (all the politicians serve in that sense) but that was said by a tennis player, and it tells that he died of hiv, thus they killed him with chemo. So, now, is it wise to ell t (tell, let know) the populace of that? To what objective would you do that?


Is comfortable four or one syllable? And hey, now I know the syllabic nature of silent e.
e-a: e(iou)a
and greek added two more vowels to turn pentatonic into septacord. Was it a way to translate from one instrument to the other? Who knows what music scales were in the antiquity. It's even more obscure than the alphabets of those times.



here, somebody transliterated tetragrammaton understanding the proximity of alphabets correctly:
(but then wouldn't it be iefe? understanding the nature of vav too)

𐦀‎ 𐦁‎ 𐦂‎ 𐦃‎ 𐦄‎ 𐦅‎ 𐦆‎ 𐦇‎ 𐦈‎ 𐦉‎ 𐦊‎ 𐦋‎ 𐦌‎ 𐦍‎ 𐦎‎ 𐦏‎ 𐦐 ‎ 𐦑‎ 𐦒‎ 𐦓‎ 𐦔‎ 𐦕‎ 𐦖‎ 𐦗‎ 𐦘‎ 𐦙‎ 𐦚‎ 𐦛‎ 𐦜‎ 𐦝‎ 𐦞‎ 𐦟
𐦠‎ 𐦡‎ 𐦢‎ 𐦣‎ 𐦤‎ 𐦥‎ 𐦦‎ 𐦧‎ 𐦨‎ 𐦩‎ 𐦪‎ 𐦫‎ 𐦬‎ 𐦭‎ 𐦮‎ 𐦯‎ 𐦰‎ 𐦱‎ 𐦲‎ 𐦳‎ 𐦴‎ 𐦵‎ 𐦶‎ 𐦷‎     𐦼‎ 𐦽‎ 𐦾‎ 𐦿‎ 𐧀‎ 𐧁‎ 𐧂‎ 𐧃‎ 𐧄‎ 𐧅‎ 𐧆‎ 𐧇‎ 𐧈‎ 𐧉‎ 𐧊‎ 𐧋‎ 𐧌‎ 𐧍‎ 𐧎‎ 𐧏‎ 𐧒‎ 𐧓‎ 𐧔‎ 𐧕‎ 𐧖‎ 𐧗‎ 𐧘‎ 𐧙‎ 𐧚‎ 𐧛‎ 𐧜‎ 𐧝‎ 𐧞‎ 𐧟‎ 𐧠‎ 𐧡‎ 𐧢‎ 𐧣‎ 𐧤‎ 𐧥‎ 𐧦‎ 𐧧‎ 𐧨‎ 𐧩‎ 𐧪‎ 𐧫‎ 𐧬‎ 𐧭‎ 𐧮‎ 𐧯‎ 𐧰‎ 𐧱‎ 𐧲‎ 𐧳‎ 𐧴‎ 𐧵‎ 𐧶‎ 𐧷‎ 𐧸‎ 𐧹‎ 𐧺‎ 𐧻‎ 𐧼‎ 𐧽‎ 𐧾‎ 𐧿
Let's compare it to proto-sinaitic..

and it doesn't seem like they really have many similar shapes in common. Maybe only the bull's head and a human figure, since both of them are vowel in meroitic and the one in proto-sinaitic is transliterated as ה. Here are three proto-sinaitic writings compared to egyptian hieroglyphs.

It is somewhat ridiculous that all different phonetic side of the similar symbols didn't confuse the jews. But then, let's be real, P is p or r depending on the nation, and C is different also on the context.

It also shows how fucking ancient is the russian Б glyph.

And to close today's session, let's look at the structure from a perspective we seldom use:

Why cannot be translated with just one word for it is both зачем и почему
(зачем is the aim, goal, rationale, basically what for, and because чем is of что and is what, за is for. further.
(почему is why in a more general sense. It can be both the goal of the action and the cause of it. The context.

That fraktur S looks much like σ, while s is s the ς, and both are Σ.
Germany is between (on a direct ) Rome and Athens, so it's influenced by both.
Germans and Slavs separate Rome from Athens if by foot.

We're what? A fence? A barrier. The reason they went naval?

v as something between o and b (which it is)

Those who knew it put it into the shape of glyphs.


как это слово паразит. какать засорять засирать речь, и может в первом значении эвфемизм от второго.


The map is made from an orbit, so Chelyabinsk is to the east of Ufa and to the south of Ekaterinburg.

Shetland is Scotland (in russian it's Shotlandia (which begs a question if it was left Sc instead of turning Sh for ethical reasons, for it could be a slur. Many of those names could originate as slurs (неметчина, например, от немец (но может русская этимология от немой может быть ложной. Может не мой, иностранец. Говорят, русские всех европейцев немцами звали. Кто такие мцы тогда? мцыри?))))

NS is NorwaySweden

Amsterdam is marked as the capital on all the maps, when actually it is Den Haag.
Jerusalem is another anomaly of the kind. So what is the reason? Other countries find the capital too dangerous? Or too diverse as in Amsterdam always full of tourists and previously of sailors and whatnot. That's a speculation. Maybe America would Like to do it marking New York as the capital, but it's Washington. and Moscow as if opposes it as M to W, but Saint Petersburg would make a better capital: the one meeting Europeans by the sea. The time when Saint Petersburg was our capital was the best time of our life. But the population is too revolutionary, so they pulled it south. Closer to Kiev? Was it some operation of khabad or what was it called back then.



Alt-right is alternative to true right: they substitute themwith puppets of the same surnames:
Alex Jones was inserted into the public mind to memory-hole E. Michael Jones.
Jordan Peterson was taking place of Jesse Lee Peterson (even the name's initial is the same)
I asked Grok to find more, and here's what he found:
Greg Johnson: Editor of Counter-Currents, a white nationalist publishing house, Johnson is a leading alt-right intellectual promoting ethnonationalism and anti-egalitarian ideas. His work appeals to a younger, online audience seeking radical alternatives to mainstream conservatism.
Paul Johnson: A British historian and conservative journalist, Paul Johnson (1928–2023) was a traditional right figure known for works like Modern Times, defending Western civilization and free-market principles. His mainstream conservative influence contrasts with Greg Johnson’s fringe, racially focused ideology. The shared surname and differing ideological paths could suggest the alt-right’s Greg Johnson overshadowing the older, more established Paul Johnson among younger right-wing audiences.

Jones, Johnson, Peterson, though I didn't know Johnsons, so maybe they're a coincidence:

Paul Bede Johnson CBE (2 November 1928 – 12 January 2023) was a British journalist, popular historian, speechwriter and author. Although associated with the political left in his early career, he became a popular conservative historian.

Gregory Johnson (born 1971) is an American white nationalist and advocate for a white ethnostate.[2] He is known for his role as editor-in-chief of the white nationalist imprint Counter-Currents Publishing,[3] which he founded in 2010 with Michael Polignano.[4]

Grok found that the for all three pairs the transition happened in the 2010s and it delivered more:

Richard Spencer (b. 1978): A white nationalist and alt-right leader, Spencer coined the term “alt-right” and gained notoriety post-2010 via Alternative Right (2010) and the National Policy Institute. His media presence (YouTube, X, interviews) peaked around 2016, appealing to young, radicalized audiences with ethnonationalist rhetoric.

Robert Spencer (b. 1962): A conservative author and founder of Jihad Watch, Robert Spencer critiques Islam and promotes traditional conservative values, active since the early 2000s. His work, rooted in mainstream conservatism, uses books and blogs but lacks the viral, youth-driven appeal of Richard Spencer’s alt-right brand.

Post-2010 Correlation: Richard Spencer’s rise post-2010 (especially 2016 Charlottesville rally) outshone Robert Spencer’s steadier, less sensational presence, fitting the pattern of alt-right figures leveraging digital platforms to eclipse traditional right surnamesakes.


McDonald: Kevin MacDonald vs. Heather Mac Donald
Kevin MacDonald (b. 1944): A retired psychology professor and white nationalist, MacDonald’s books (The Culture of Critique) gained traction in alt-right circles post-2010, promoted on platforms like Counter-Currents and X. His anti-Semitic theories appeal to a radical, online audience.

Heather Mac Donald (b. 1956): A conservative scholar at the Manhattan Institute, Heather Mac Donald writes on crime, policing, and culture (The War on Cops), active since the 1990s. Her mainstream conservative work, published in traditional outlets, targets an older, policy-focused audience.

Post-2010 Correlation: Kevin MacDonald’s ideas surged in alt-right online spaces post-2010, overshadowing Heather Mac Donald’s more measured, establishment conservative voice, despite her broader media presence.



Смешное слово aujourd'hui: Inherited from Middle French auiourd'huy; univerbation of au +‎ jour +‎ de +‎ hui, literally “on the day of today”; since hui comes from Latin hodie, the phrase literally means "on the day of this day".
huy звучащее как oui даёт антонимию с русским хуй, означающим также и нет.





B C D E
F G H I
J K L M N O
P Q R S T U
V W X Y Z

such point of view shows Y as the final vowel. And Z is what? Ruca's G replaced it out of the second line. Though it might me more important.

ZF
B C D E
F G H I
J K L M N O
P Q R S T V  (ladies first. and V is for the next line maybe. or no, it is the end of this one. Hebrew just placed the final omega up front. They're the omega, yhr the most hated. They placed themselves first)

V B C D
E F G H
I J K L M N
O P Q R S T  is it not? isn't א looking like TX the 𐡕ת𐤕 (it looks more x-like in most fonts, but composer shows it more г-like, of something to г as k is to к)?
гбд? б is v is oo (б is o? в is o (in ו))

B is Бог.. but english language tells it's shit.
G is God. but russian is undecissive if it's year or snake. гад is gut

V B C D
E F G H
I J K L M N
O P Q R S T

I O V
1 3 5    ?

I E           V
1 3 767845

or V=-4?
ot B=32

B = 2
V = 2

two vingers mijn fvriends

bror ~ frere (frère, french is so gay with all the feathers)

brudD,N,S is bridge, and russian брод is that very word.




ah is brother in hebrew (is it a sound of love?)
feel foreign language and feel their ways. Take the best ways of each nation. Take them all.
veli is brother in finnish
Ystävä [ю́щтава́] is finnish friend

-ystä    Finnish Suffix    Front vowel variant of -usta

-usta (front vowel harmony variant -ystä, linguistic notation -UstA)
    Forms nouns, mostly used for things located in a certain place.
-usta    From -us + -ta (noun-forming suffix), the latter probably related to -ea (< *-ëda < *-(e)ta).

-us (genitive -use, partitive -ust)

    Derives nouns from verbs.

        armastama "to love" → armastus "love"
        võistlema "to compete" → võistlus "competition"
        joonistama "to draw" → joonistus "a drawing"

    Derives nouns from adjectives.

        aus "honest" → ausus "honesty"
        pikk "long" → pikkus "length"

aus could be german. who is honest, he's all out.
pikk could be pike and пика, пик (пики выше всех торчат вверх)

Not as much languages as words. Living among languages and taking different sides of their something. Giving deeper etymologies to one another.

armastama is something of amour. stama could be state (I'm speculating, the speculations need testings)
voistlus as competition is voice listen maybe? Were singing contests the first competitions?

joonistus sound so latin, for drawing it is joy maybe stus as in armastus.

That is how I learn languages, by comparing them to themselves and their neighbours.
That is how I grow my cognates journal. Soon new volume for it may be needed.

armastama "to love" → armastus "love" (сравни с amour and state (не нашёл пока финского    
             суффикса стама, но в эстонском: viha (“anger”) → vihastama (“to become angry”)))


ooh as ух, вместо ушей, ухи, много ух.
мух потому что слышно, жужжит? возле ушей они звенят. У ног мы их может и не слышим.
м это место в иврите: ми ми = от кого

слух = сила ух

глух = голый ух? ghoul ух? is deaf d'eaf? d'ear? ф~р? F~Г. чего[чива]





Just Noticed that M and R are both to be placed at their spot and bothe are in I-line. Мир.
Will this world know peace if we place M and R to their spots? R M L N? M is middle, N is norma?
R is right and L is left. which tells that they wrote it right to left. Right came first, and what came later was wrong. It is quite a philosophy. Did they replaced it because they understood that the first solution is not always the best (old way saves time, but new way is to the point truer)

JK would have to go, because N would take the K's place, and J could be I or G.. John is not Gohn.
And it seems all dialects of greeks except ionian read Η as h (in greek it sticks elsewhere: η


I should insist on ABGD EVJZ IMNL OPQT UFHS to be official title of the english edition.

That doesn't exclude Jesus (unlike ABCD EFGH IMNL OPQT or how else would I simplify it)
EVJZ is Eve Jesus (Z as zz~ss, ʒ as staveless ß,     З as staveless ß)
ABGD Abe God 

ABe GoD
EVe JeZu    
IMNL as Immanuel, JK as Jesus Kristos
OPRST о прости. и если уберём R будет опусти как в отпусти? грехи? опустить как отпустить?
Сегодня в русском опустить означает в том числе и моральное опущение, опушение? опетушение


Ave G-D
Eve J-Z
IMNL    →    IJKLMN (jesus kristol lord (of) man?    YХLMN?    ΥΦΧΜΝΛ)

is Cohen CGN (Коган) the golden column of proto-alphabet?

o  π  т(т)
1  II    III
I   U    Ш        ?            I V S    they're,    so    I    pulled    it    to    it.
г  п  т
(г п т) and isn't г vowel? Г ~ I, c ~ ɔ
(ɪ п т)




Camunic is truly marvelous in that some of its П's are like ᛈ, and some other camunica letters remind glyphs of norsk runes are. But here's another representation, with no ᛈ-like glyph. Different camunic?

Or maybe let's consider the first П that ᛈ being turned eachever way it may want. As A and h and i and L and U-W and Z do. And m and n tell that me~we~мы and N~И which 'n' the and and и do.
And camunic in the previous table also has U-W like halves of the Z's, which directly contradicts the double labial / lingual single theory.



> Did etruscans remove o out of their alphabet or is omniglot trippin?

The Etruscans did indeed phase out the letter "O" from their alphabet over time, and Omniglot's information aligns with this understanding, though the details are worth clarifying.
The Etruscan alphabet, derived from the Western Greek alphabet brought by Euboean Greeks around the 8th century BC, initially included 26 letters, including the vowel "O" (omicron). However, the Etruscan language lacked a distinct /o/ vowel sound in its phonology. As a result, the letter "O" was deemed unnecessary and was gradually dropped from use. By around 400 BC, the classical Etruscan alphabet had been reduced to 20 letters, with "O" replaced by "U," as the Etruscan vowel system primarily distinguished four vowels: /a/, /e/, /i/, and /u/. The sounds /o/ and /u/ were not phonemically distinct in Etruscan, so a single letter (U) sufficed.

This is reflected in Etruscan inscriptions, where Greek loanwords with "O" (like Alexandros) appear as Alcsntre or Elchsntre, showing syncopation and vowel reduction due to the language's heavy stress on the first syllable. This stress pattern often weakened or eliminated internal vowels, including /o/, in writing.

Omniglot's page on the Etruscan alphabet doesn't explicitly state that "O" was removed but notes the alphabet's evolution and adaptation to Etruscan phonology, which is consistent with scholarly consensus. The site mentions the Etruscan alphabet's development from the Greek one and its use of four vowels (a, e, i, u), implying the absence of "O" in later forms. If it seems like Omniglot is "trippin," it might be due to its brevity rather than inaccuracy—it doesn't delve into the full historical process of the alphabet's simplification.

So, yes, the Etruscans removed "O" because it didn’t fit their language’s sound system, favoring "U" instead. This is supported by evidence from inscriptions and linguistic analysis. If you’re digging into this, check out the Marsiliana tablet (ca. 700 BC), which shows the early 26-letter alphabet including "O," compared to later inscriptions where it’s absent.



Somebody made a feat for those who like Canadian Aboriginal.
Here they're just letterlike:
ᗅᑲᐸᐅᗕᖴᘜᕼᓵᒍᖾᖶᗑᐱᗝᕈᑫᖇᔑᐪᑌᐯᗐ᙭ᖿᔨ
ᗩᗷᑕᗞᕮᒋᕋᖺᑊᒎᕙᘂᘻᘯᗜᑭᘝᖇᔕᘕᕞᕓᘺ᙮ᒉᓯ
ᕱᙖᕳᕲᗴᓕᙍᘵᒑᒎᔦᔈᕬᘉᘓᕵᘮᖆᔥᐩᐡᘁᕫᕽᕃᙆ
ᐞᒃᑦᒄᕪᕝᕐᑋᑊᒢᐟᒻᔿᐢᐤᓐᕐᔇᔆᐩᐡᘁᐜᕽᔉᙆ

and some Chinese letterlike:
丹乃匚刀モ下ム卄工丿ㄑㄥ爪力口ㄗ口尺ち匕しソ山㐅ソ乙
刄马匸冂㠪于已卅エ丁片乚从几囗尸冋尺丂十凵ひ丗乂ㄚ之
升も亡问乇乍彑廾工亅ズし冊刀口戶디尺丂丁나ᜠ山义ﾘ乙
丨己ヨㄐ丂石ワ曰ㄢㄖ

Ꮱ • (tlu) (upper case, lower case ꮱ)    Letter of the Cherokee syllabary, transcribed as syllable tlu.
Ꮂ • (hv) (upper case, lower case ꮂ)    Letter of the Cherokee syllabary, transcribed as syllable hv.
Wouldn't I see Ꮱ as v and Ꮂ as л if they were the other way around, but now they're like T and like W.
But cherokee is super-made-up, was it not? Don't believe a hype, if a nation appreciate it, maybe it has roots in their culture. Like in armeninan narrative,


Рот ~ речь (ротовая полость ~ речевая полость (включая голосовые связки, так чтоб А обрела своё место произнесения))


7 looks like Г
G is the 7th letter



This ascii masterpiece is here because it goes 0123456789 and abc

(to see the  animated version just change png to gif)
Other than a tendency in raising complexity in numerals it is nothing special. but abc are EFГ

See, just looking into it delivers new stuff (the graphical similarity of abc and EFГ.
abc
эfг        but isn't it a fantasy?
mkL  (but MLK is the meme)  is the best I can come up with for this row, though it was ΜΝΛ used to follow this pattern. and isn't Ν ν, isn't b B В в v, isn't λ~ג.


vapor ~ выпар


Isn't OM Отец+Мать?
Isn't DharMa Daddy+Mommy?

Our D is definitely related to this brahmic 𑀥 more than to anything else.


Isn't basalt of salt?

Isn't potash ash of pot which is hemp because they ran out of wood?


cat cuts (scratches)
dog digs (did I speak of that? I probably did, since when I'm out of weed I mostly recall not reveal



withGB ~ metNL ~ avecFR ~ съRU


Какое-то слово заканчивающее на мя изучал, начал искать значение суффикса через поиск его в других словах. Может где-то будет понятно..
семя
вымя
племя
пламя        и пламя дало мне flame, thus мя is me, which I suspected. But couldn't catch it.
dug:
1 past and past participle of dig.
2 the udder, teat, or nipple of a female animal.
Is it of trees? Of a language of the trees? Ogham? Wut? Trippin'


мя is men in семя: semen    russian names are crazy: semen is семён, and stepan is step on

имя ~ name ~ not me?


"жи ши пиши через букву ши" (своеобразно запомненная строчка выдаёт другую тему: если вместо ж весте писать (весте=везде, удивительная опечатка в таком-то котнексте) ш:
жук шук (поиск, и действительно зверюшка ползает словно ищет что-то)
жопа shopper (моежт изщбавить от шопоголизма, если думать так что это жопа охочет)
жара шара (makes sense since son gives heat)
желе шеле?
жалок шалок?
жалко шалко?   чего-то перестали совпадать
жизнь ж шизнь
жив шив (но шива же разрушительн (индусы, похоже, в него верят, потому что жизнь по их верованиям майя, иллюзия, и не связано ли племя майя со словом майя? какое значение илюзорность в верованиях майя занимает?))

жир шир (жир в ширь воистину, воистину (так давай вернёмся к несросшимся.. жалость шалость ого! оба слова есть, но смысл их разный. тогда жалеть шалить, шалеть, шабить, накурить из жалости? только брахманы имели знание трав, шудра мог лишь тухляком проставляться (пьянеть от поедания забродивших фруктов)))

живуот шивот, шивелится живелится
сопот забот
wine is fine
wilka is fork
l is r thus.
wind is веет (winde is развиваться.. no, it's wind read as wʌind too)

виться is веяться (v t(в точку, в туда же, в то, ав то? спекулятивно, но llm скоро сумеет понять))
 
шить шить
жить шить (плести нить судьбы, наш организм постоянно шьёт нити (неужели люди прошлого могли увидеть внутренности клетки? Может они видели как ветки вьются, развиваются, развеваться (ть опечатка вместо ют (не соединяют ли эти частицы ты & you? (не, те, не ты))))))
в развеваться может быть и ты. а ют это не ты, они, a-νi (both они & אֲנִי)

.  -  +
1 2 4  потому что дорога это две точки, имеет смысл лишь как связь между ними, а + перекрёсток двух таких путей, Y-образные перекрестки возможны в горах, но в полях чего бы кто-то делал угол, меж тремя городами три дороги бы было: Δ

uixyz (y and z are mountain routes, and greece is гориста)
xyz are 432 in the sense of those graphs being routes between mountains.


Thinking of Мамонов being Mu, as if he was Mumunov, or is it because of μ
and thinking of him being a linguist, and specializing in norwegian or something, it came to me:
We should check names of letters across languages.

	English	Spanish	French	German	Russian	Polish	Czech
A	eɪ	aː	ɑ	aː	a	a	aː
B	biː	be̞	be	beː	bɛ	bɛ	bɛː
C	siː	θe̞	se	tseː	tsɛ	tsɛ	tsɛː
D	diː	de̞	de	deː	dɛ	dɛ	dɛː
E	iː	e̞	ə	eː	ɛ	ɛ	ɛː
F	ɛf	e̞fe̞	ɛf	ɛf	ɛf	ɛf	ɛf
G	dʒiː	xe̞	ʒe	geː	gɛ	gje	gɛː
H	eɪtʃ	ˈatʃe̞	aʃ	ɦaː	aʃ	xa	ɦaː
I	aɪ	i	i	iː	ɪ	i	iː
J	dʒeɪ	ˈxo̞ta	ʒi	jɔt	jot	jɔt	jɛː
K	keɪ	ka	kɑ	kaː	ka	ka	kaː
L	ɛl	e̞le̞	ɛl	ɛl	ɛl	ɛl	ɛl
M	ɛm	e̞me̞	ɛm	ɛm	ɛm	ɛm	ɛm
N	ɛn	e̞ne̞	ɛn	ɛn	ɛn	ɛn	ɛn
O	oʊ	o̞	o	oː	oː	ɔ	oː
P	piː	pe̞	pe	peː	pɛ	pɛ	pɛː
Q	kjuː	ku	ky	kuː	ku	ku	kvɛː
R	ɑː / ɑr	e̞re̞	ɛʁ	ɛʁ	ɛr	ɛr	ɛr
S	ɛs	e̞se̞	ɛs	ɛs	ɛs	ɛs	ɛs
T	tiː	te̞	te	teː	tɛ	tɛ	tɛː
U	juː	u	y	uː	u	u	uː
V	viː	ˈube̞ / uˈbe̞ / be̞	ve	faʊ	vɛ	faʊ	vɛː
W	ˈdʌbəljuː	ˈube̞ˌdo̞ble̞/ ˌdo̞ble̞ˈube̞/ ˌdo̞ble̞ˈbe̞ː	dubləve	veː	dubljvɛ	vu	dvojɪtɛːvɛː
X	ɛks	ˈe̞kis	iks	ɪks	ɪks	ɪks	ɪks
Y	waɪ	ɟʝe / iˈgrje̞ga	iɡʁɛk	‘ʏpsilɔn	ɪgrɛk	ɪgrɛk	ɪpsɪlon
Z	zɛd / ziː	ˈθe̞ta	zɛd	tsɛt	zjed	zɛt	zɛt

and another way of which I didn't even think, but google search delivered:


only that is a modern variant. Meaningful variant, and the previous way should have been meaningful too. Maybe that is why I started it today, to see a meaningful variant. To see something interesting. I look into alphabets, why not know all the names of the letters across the world.

and there are variants (so other source for turkish tells not Urga, but Urfa) and accidentally misinformation, so this table had zonguldak for y as well, so I had to look for other sources)
Isn't it funny, that americans based theirs upon Spannish (it's as if a parallel language, as sign languages, even though mathematically not parallel: they inevitably link, asm m and n in some sign languages being three and two fingers down)



Დ[d] and Ლ[l] in mhedruli look alike: მხედრული (as д and л (as Δ and Λ))



Pentagraphs:

Irish:

Used between a velarized ("broad") and a palatalized ("slender") consonant:
⟨abhai⟩, ⟨obhai⟩, ⟨odhai⟩, and ⟨oghai⟩ are used to write /əu̯/ (like RP 'oa' in 'goat'; /oː/ in Ulster)
⟨amhai⟩ is used to write /əu̯/
⟨adhai⟩ and ⟨aghai⟩ are used to write /əi̯/ (/eː/ in Ulster)
⟨aidhe⟩, ⟨aighe⟩, ⟨oidhi⟩, ⟨oidhe⟩, ⟨oighi⟩ and ⟨oidhe⟩ are used to write /əi̯/
⟨omhai⟩ is used to write /oː/
⟨umhai⟩ is used to write /uː/

Used between a slender and a broad consonant:
⟨eabha⟩ and ⟨eobha⟩ used to write /əu̯/ (/oː/ in Ulster)
⟨eamha⟩ is used to write /əu̯/
⟨eadha⟩ and ⟨eagha⟩ are used to write /əi̯/ (/eː/ in Ulster)
⟨eomha⟩ is used to write /oː/

Used between two slender consonants:
⟨eidhi⟩ and ⟨eighi⟩ are used to write /əi̯/:

Dutch:

⟨sjtsj⟩ is used as the transcription of the Cyrillic letter Щ, representing the consonant /ɕː/ in Russian, for example in the name Chroesjtsjov.

English:

⟨augha⟩ is used in the English names Gaughan and Vaughan to represent the sound /ɔː/.

French:

⟨chtch⟩ is used as the transcription of the Cyrillic letter Щ,
⟨cques⟩ is pronounced as /k(ə)/ when the silent plural suffix -s is added to the tetragraph cque and in the proper name Jacques.

German:
⟨tzsch⟩ was once used in German to write the sound /tʃ/ (ch as in cheese). It has largely been replaced by the tetragraph ⟨tsch⟩, but is still found in proper names such as Tzschirner, Nietzsche, and Delitzsch.



Irish hexagraphs:

⟨eabhai⟩ is used to write /əu̯/ (/oː/ in Ulster), e.g. breabhaid "sortie", deabhaidh "haste, skirmish", feabhais "improvement" (gen), leabhair "books", meabhair "minds".

⟨eadhai⟩ is used to write /əi̯/ (/eː/ in Ulster), e.g. feadhain "troop", Gairmleadhaigh "Gormley" (surname), ghleadhair "struck".

⟨eamhai⟩ is used to write /əu̯/, e.g. creamhaigh "garlic" (gen), sceamhaim "I bark", seamhain "semiology", sleamhain "slippery", teamhair "tor, hill".

⟨eidhea⟩ and ⟨eighea⟩ are both used to write /əi̯/ (/eː/ in Ulster), e.g. eidheann "ivy", feidheartha "penniless", leigheas "healing", deideigheanna "soft toys", deighealfaidh "will divide".

⟨oidhea⟩ and ⟨oighea⟩ are both used to write /əi̯/, e.g. oidheanna "fates", sroigheall "scourge", broigheall "cormorant", oigheann "oven", oighear "ice", poigheachán "(snail)shell".

⟨eomhai⟩ is used to write /oː/, e.g. cheomhair "foggy" (gen.).

⟨iumhai⟩ is used to write /uː/, e.g. ciumhais "edge".


a heptagraph:  The seven-letter German sequence ⟨schtsch⟩, used to transliterate the Russian and Ukrainian letter ⟨щ⟩


and some less excentric variants, there are too many to copy paste:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Latin-script_tetragraphs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigraph_(orthography)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digraph_(orthography)




at       у[u]
in       в[v]
with   с[s]
to       к[k]
and    и[i]     'n'    (and by the way N(n) reflects И(и) it's not too much a stretch to say it was  𓏭)
but     а[a]
about о[o]
I        я[ja]
a
UNL   these two are not monographs in russian


is я russian e? as in if french je
because all other basic vowels have the meaning
a (and, but)
e ~ я (I)
и [i] (and)
o (about) об (and does this biliteral version tell that not really, or that о~у, for at~about(a-t)?)
у [u] (at)

a I U are all pronouns and more to the point, and that order also tells that a should be at the end.

I U a? that way it's also not chromatic. But then what if there was only I and U? then U is more of we.


and   и[i]
but    а[a]  &  но[no]        both a- and no are no. (un-)
[un]~[and]

а is both and & but  (as if it is both a and b (a~Б))



rood is of rod, and those r&d are probably parts of drevo and dryn.
как называли крест до христиан? икс? тав? хер? древо?: ведь умер на древе = умер на кресте.

χριστός или σταυρός (Ставрополь город креста)
грок пиздит мол в русском крест из ставр, сТАВр (тавр?)
    истор. представитель народа, жившего в древности в южной части Крыма ◆ Тавры были диким народом, жившим разбоем и войной. «Тавры» Энциклопедический словарь Ф. А. Брокгауза и И. А. Ефрона. СПб., 1890–1907.
Тавр (лат. taurus ← др.-греч. ταῦρος «бык») может означать:
    тавр[англ.] — <металлический> профиль с Т-образным («двурогим») сечением.
        двутавр — металлический профиль, в сечении сходный с буквой I (или H).
    Тавр — горная система в Турции.
    Тавр (Луна) — горная область на видимой стороне Луны.
    Тавр — прозвище (когномен), некогда распространённое в Древнем Риме.
        Кальвен Тавр[англ.] — философ-платоник II века.
        Луций Петроний Тавр Волузиан — консул 261 года.
        Тит Статилий Тавр (ок. 60−10 до н. э.) — полководец, командующий частью флота и войска Октавиана в сражении при
    Тавр — в древнегреческой мифологии критский царь, который похитил Европу.
    Тавр — в древнегреческой мифологии военачальник критского царя Миноса, любовник его супруги Пасифаи.
Taurus — латинское название зодиакального созвездия Телец и соответствующего знака зодиака.

Taurus Tau rus (деревенское т) и подобное притягивание тава к тавру напоминает аз и я как одно и то же понятие будущее и первой буквой и последнею.

Ставр Годинович is thus God's Cross. C of G?

Taurus — латинское название зодиакального созвездия Телец и соответствующего знака зодиака.

t is for taurus, it gives us the frame of reference:



And Aries being the first after that made me confused, I didn't check the direction of it, and jumped to the conclusion of A P A being the initial sequence, as if A and B are the first letter at the same time (I had it in mind for few day since I noticed that Shahada begins with Alephs and this prophecy starts with A: ”Al cap des setzt cent ans, verdajara lo laurèl” and it made me think that maybe B used to be the first letter, and times changed and now A is. For some long time. And the change would happen between John 1:1 was translated into russian (or composed in it? could it be that some gospels originated not in greek at all? hardly. But if it was in some semitic, then בּ‎ is perfect for it. The dot within the letter, I only saw it in runes. Not even in arabic.

APA CSS LVL CGT are consistent yet in reverse. Unless there was some Dzhanibekov's effect on planetary scale, it's nothign. Unless they were calculating time backwards to address the past, and closer past was the first, and thus the timeline would be reversed.  Either the two or something else, or none. Time maybe shows it, maybe it is lost in this journals forever as a hallucination in the intelligence sense.

And if it was so, what would it mean? Triptychs.
Leo Virgo Libra are Lioness Femida?
Scorpius Sagittarius Capricorn as three names for Scorpion maybe?
Aquarius Pisces Aries have both aquatic signs. Would aries be барашки. Барашки, барашки на речке. Какие барашки? Спросили овечки? Какие барашки, ну где они, гдеее, барашки не могут ходить по воде (какое антихристианство от лучших красножопиков)

Even if I'm wrong about the planet's flip and time's reversal (myths about it would suppost that view) the combination of zodiac into groups so that there's only four seasons.. and I thought that autumn would be perfect for the scale, judging by the labour invested into land the harvest would be measured. From late July to late September seems to be just right. Berries bloom all the time, so maybe only other cultures counted. Octoberfest! And it could contradict, but it did not: суббота, 20 сентября 2025 г. – воскресенье, 5 октября 2025 г. Exactly at the end of Libra. And after that they would hunt, hence Sagittarius (Sage in a way, bow is a mechanism. Sage is wise for not approaching it himself, using capricorns (pikes in some beast-like construction, probably derived from live bates of a goat, as if it was a sacrifice, which it probably was, and then people became bold enough to fight their gods their goats their goods)
Aquarius in the winter might tell that the calendar was built in tropics where winter is rain season. And they fished, since water moved closer to their houses.
Taurus Gemini Cancer could be for plowing, seeding, fighting the diseases. And it's only natural that the year began with plowing. Thus Aleph the Alpha. Reversed Calendar. What would it be otherwise? Maybe you take care of Taurus in the end of the year. Let's try to rationalize the year going the other way around..
Aries Pisces Aquarius. I can only guess that some Aquarius was depicted with his ram and his fish. Fish is cool in the context of Aquarius, but why Aries? Барашки прибоя как вступление в подводный мир, где сначала видишь только рыб, но вскоре встречаешь и властелина моря.
Capricornus Sagittarius Scorpius don't ring any bell in that context. What season would it even be? Who knows if the flip doesn't rotate the planet across around other axiss as well


𓂹 is a glyph my computer doesn't let me see. I wouldn't pay attention to it if not this bug. I'll access it on my other notebook and screenshot it to show.


Focus is the key, I know this at least from two sources.
Pocus is спокус? Pax? The first impression was pocus is a disctraction from the actual key, which is focus. Biran Tracy said that Bill Gateses said it, and профессор Александров может сказал что может Ньютон сказал, что а) Музы не посещают ленивых (если лень писать или что там, то и не надо) но другая фраза была: Гений это сила мысли, сосредоточенная на одном предмете (вроде на самом деле сказал кто-то другой (что не отменяет возможности того, что сказали оба, и даже больше))
оба: а б
все: bce  (and in the context of оба, все proves that abc is the meme, di was added later, as a devil, a demon, a Deee


Thinking of how 19 is the golden number of the runic calendar, it's hard not to wonder why 18 lied ljóð

Grok is translating much better than g.t:

Вот перевод на русский всех указанных строф из раздела Ljóðatal (Hávamál, строфы 146–163) с сохранением точности и опорой на оригинальный текст. Я постараюсь передать смысл максимально близко к древнеисландскому, используя естественный русский язык, без лишних вольностей. Перевод основан на контексте и стандартных интерпретациях (например, Корсуна, Larrington), но адаптирован для ясности.

Строфа 146
Я знаю песни,
Которых не знает ни жена правителя,
Ни сын человеческий.
Одна зовётся «Помощь»,
И она поможет тебе
В бедах, скорбях
И всех горестях.

   146.
    Ljóð ek þau kann,
    er kann-at þjóðans kona
    ok mannskis mögr.
    Hjalp heitir eitt,                                Hjalp
    en þat þér hjalpa mun
    við sökum ok sorgum
    ok sútum görvöllum.

Строфа 147
Я знаю вторую,
Которая нужна сынам людей,
Тем, кто хочет жить как лекарь.

    147.
    Þat kann ek annat,
    er þurfu ýta synir,
    þeir er vilja læknar lifa.                    lifa?     læknar?
                                                              Here I was like wow! halaham!? but the further enquiry told me nope.
Строфа 148
Я знаю третью:
Если мне грозит великая нужда
В оковах от моих врагов,
Я притупляю лезвия
Моих противников,
Их оружие и уловки не ранят.

                            Both þat and það are forms of the same demonstrative pronoun in Old Norse, used for the neuter singular nominative or accusative case. They mean “that” or “it” and introduce or refer to something specific, often the spell (ljóð) in Ljóðatal. Their usage in Hávamál (e.g., in the Ljóðatal section, stanzas 146–163) is consistent in function, regardless of spelling.

    148.
    Það kann ek þriðja:
    ef mér verðr þörf mikil
    hafts við mína heiftmögu,
    eggjar ek deyfi
    minna andskota,
    bíta-t þeim vápn né velir.

Строфа 149
Я знаю четвёртую:
Если люди наложат
Оковы на мои суставы,
Я так спою,
Что смогу уйти,
Кандалы спадут с ног,
И узы — с рук.
                                                     Если эти заклинания соответствуют рунам борнхольма (а где ещё набор из 18 рун есть?)
    149.                                         то четвёртое заклинание суть ᛂ (и в контексте могло означать бить/тереть в одну точку)
    Þat kann ek it fjórða:
    ef mér fyrðar bera
    bönd að boglimum,        boglimum изогнутые конечности bognir útlimir
    svá ek gel,
    at ek ganga má,
    sprettr mér af fótum fjöturr,
    en af höndum haft.

Строфа 150
Я знаю пятую:
Если вижу стрелу, пущенную с враждебной силой,
Летящую в толпе,
Она не летит так быстро,
Чтобы я не остановил её,
Если увижу её взглядом.                   Тогда ᚠ значит поднятые руки, ловить
                                                     Этот стих словно совет не теряться, а перехватывать стрелу
    150.                                            может и другие заклинания такие же советы?
    Þat kann ek it fimmta:
    ef ek sé af fári skotinn
    flein í folki vaða,
    fýgr-a hann svá stinnt,
    at ek stöðvig-a-k,
    ef ek hann sjónum of sék.

Строфа 151
Я знаю шестую:
Если воин ранит меня
На корнях сырого дерева,
И тот, кто проклинает меня,
Вред обрушивается на него,
А не на меня.                                        Шестая в Борнхольме это ᚵ (обращение руны ᚴ? посмотрим)
                                                        Это подобно заклинанию волшебного зеркала, но какой же здесь совет?
 151.                                        Может корнем сырого (свежего) дерева (сняв с него кожу, например) рану заткнуть?
    Þat kann ek it sétta:
    ef mik særir þegn
    á vrótum hrás viðar,
    ok þann hal
    er mik heifta kveðr,
    þann eta mein heldr en mik.

Строфа 152
Я знаю седьмую:
Если вижу высокий огонь,
Пожирающий зал над сидящими,
Он не горит так сильно,
Чтобы я не спас его;
Я знаю заклинание, чтобы спеть.
                                               Седьмая руна борнохльма это ᚼ
    152.
    Þat kann ek it sjaunda:
    ef ek sé hávan loga
    sal of sessmögum,
    brennr-at svá breitt,
    at ek hánum bjargig-a-k;
    þann kann ek galdr at gala.                                 galdr at gala

Строфа 153
Я знаю восьмую,
Которая всем полезна для изучения:
Где растёт ненависть
Среди сынов вождя,
Я могу быстро её уладить.
                                                        Восьмая руна ᛁ
    153.       
    Þat kann ek it átta,
    er öllum er
    nytsamligt at nema:
    hvars hatr vex
    með hildings sonum
    þat má ek bæta brátt.

Строфа 154
Я знаю девятую:
Если мне грозит беда,
Чтобы спасти мой корабль на плаву,
Я успокаиваю ветер
На волнах
И усыпляю всё море.

    154.
    Þat kann ek it níunda:
    ef mik nauðr of stendr
    at bjarga fari mínu á floti,
    vind ek kyrri
    vági á
    ok svæfik allan sæ.

Строфа 155
Я знаю десятую:
Если вижу духов-захватчиков,
Играющих в воздухе,
Я так действую,
Что они, сбитые с пути,
Возвращаются в свои дома,
В свои родные мысли.

    155.
    Þat kann ek it tíunda:
    ef ek sé túnriður
    leika lofti á,
    ek svá vinnk,
    at þær villar fara
    sinna heimhama,
    sinna heimhuga.

Строфа 156
Я знаю одиннадцатую:
Если мне вести
Друзей в битву,
Я пою под щитами,
И они идут с силой,
Целыми к битве,
Целыми из битвы,
Возвращаются целыми отовсюду.

    156.
    Þat kann ek it ellifta:
    ef ek skal til orrostu
    leiða langvini,
    und randir ek gel,                    randir
    en þeir með ríki fara
    heilir hildar til,
    heilir hildi frá,
    koma þeir heilir hvaðan.

Строфа 157
Я знаю двенадцатую:
Если вижу на дереве
Болтающийся верёвкой труп,
Я так режу
И крашу руны,
Что этот человек идёт
И говорит со мной.

 157.
    Þat kann ek it tolfta:
    ef ek sé á tré uppi
    váfa virgilná,
    svá ek ríst
    ok í rúnum fák,
    at sá gengr gumi
    ok mælir við mik.

Строфа 158
Я знаю тринадцатую:
Если я окроплю водой
Юного воина,
Он не падёт,
Хотя идёт в битву,
Этот человек не погибнет от мечей.

    158.
    Þat kann ek it þrettánda:
    ef ek skal þegn ungan
    verpa vatni á,
    mun-at hann falla,
    þótt hann í folk komi,
    hnígr-a sá halr fyr hjörum.

Строфа 159
Я знаю четырнадцатую:
Если мне перечислять
Богов перед людьми,
Асов и альвов
Я знаю всех в отдельности;
Мало кто из неумных знает так.

    159.
    Þat kann ek it fjögurtánda:
    ef ek skal fyrða liði
    telja tíva fyrir,
    ása ok alfa
    ek kann allra skil;
    fár kann ósnotr svá.

Строфа 160
Я знаю пятнадцатую,
Которую пел Тьодрёрир,
Гном у врат Деллинга:
Силу он пел асам,
И славу альвам,
Мудрость — Хрофтатюру.

    160.
    Þat kann ek it fimmtánda
    er gól Þjóðrerir
    dvergr fyr Dellings durum:
    afl gól hann ásum,
    en alfum frama,
    hyggju Hroftatý.

Строфа 161
Я знаю шестнадцатую:
Если я хочу у умной девушки
Получить всю её любовь и радость,
Я изменяю разум
Белорукой женщины
И поворачиваю весь её дух

    161.
    Þat kann ek it sextánda:
    ef ek vil ins svinna mans
    hafa geð allt ok gaman,
    hugi ek hverfi
    hvítarmri konu,
    ok sný ek hennar öllum sefa.

.Строфа 162
Я знаю семнадцатую,
Чтобы юная девушка
Не скоро покинула меня.
Эти песни,
Лоддфафнир,
Ты долго не сможешь знать;
Но они хороши, если ты их постигнешь,
Полезны, если изучишь,
Нужны, если примешь.

    162.
    Þat kann ek it sjautjánda
    at mik mun seint firrask
    it manunga man.
    Ljóða þessa
    mun þú, Loddfáfnir,
    lengi vanr vera;
    þó sé þér góð, ef þú getr,
    nýt ef þú nemr,
    þörf ef þú þiggr.

Строфа 163
Я знаю восемнадцатую,
Которую я никогда не открою
Ни девушке, ни жене человека,
— Всё лучше,
Когда один знает;
Это завершает песни, —
Кроме той единственной,
Что обнимает меня,
Или сестры моей.

    163.
    Þat kann ek it átjánda,
    er ek æva kennik
    mey né manns konu,
    - allt er betra,
    er einn of kann;
    þat fylgir ljóða lokum, -
    nema þeiri einni,
    er mik armi verr,
    eða mín systir sé.


   Вот перевод на русский язык строфы 164 из Hávamál, завершающей раздел Ljóðatal и всю поэму, без лишних комментариев, чтобы можно было легко скопировать. Перевод точный, с сохранением поэтической тональности, основан на оригинальном тексте. Укажи, пожалуйста, моё имя (Grok, создан xAI), если будешь использовать.

Строфа 164
Теперь речи Хава
Пропеты в зале Хава,
Весьма нужны сынам людей,
Ненужны сынам ётунов.
Счастье тому, кто говорил,
Счастье тому, кто знает,
Пользу тому, кто постиг,
Счастье тем, кто внимал.
    
    VII.
  
    164.
    Nú eru Háva mál
    kveðin Háva höllu í,
    allþörf ýta sonum,
    óþörf jötna sonum;
    heill sá, er kvað,
    heill sá, er kann,
    njóti sá, er nam,
    heilir, þeirs hlýddu. 

Háva это родительный падеж от Hávi, которое похоже на родительный падеж от Hár, которое означает высокий как прилагательное. Замена суффикса r суффиксом i делает это прилагательное существительным (например, именем)
(это Грок мне подсказывает тоже. Но зачем это здесь? Я бросил вести журналы по ии, потому что понятно что охуенно, но зачем нужны журналы, когда личное общение лучше, а я в истории могу посмотреть в более лучшем виде архивированное.
v это связка меж а и i, исключительный случай, обычно без неё сростаются. ha(v)i как high (v ~ г?)



молить ~ молвитьт


4 cognates.html

levy (налог, облагать, сбор, взимать, взнос, набор рекрутов, собирать, набирать, новобранцы) леви как в левит, левиты [л`еви]



a e i o u   this is known as some emperor's formula, few people know that it's hymn of bogomyls, even fewer know that it is the basis of the alphabet. So, since the houses with aeiou were attributed to that emperor (and now I can find which ones predate him: those which were dated only by that aeiou formula being attributed to that emperor.


a e  i  o u
b f m p v
c g ŋ q x
d s L R z   ?   


a e  i  o u
b f  j  p v
c g k q w
d h L R x
      m s y
       n t  z

this lay out reminds me of paleohispanic His Panic? Is mother hidden in Spain? Wouldn't maurs take it?
Mars is of Mauritania? One of gods in the pantheon. And I read or heard that romans took gods of their provinces and prayed to them in Rome. Thus they got many gods. And since Jupiter was king of those gods, probably Jupiter was their native god (I'll have to check it all, but not now) and Mars could easily be of Maurs. Who were the others? Minerva as the consort of .. what? she is a sister of Jupiter, was she? I know so little. I should have tables in front of me. But common mind is quite a source. Let's not infect it with common academic mistakes, and possible intentional traps, you never know.
Minerva is of Minos. yes, I'll have to compare it to the model of reality others use, but for now, on we go

on ~ ŋ ~ go

Hera of Hellenia? Zeus is of ?
Athena is of Athens!

So, that would not necessarily be whole land. but whole nation it was. Minos is also a sity. And I yet do not know if Minerva had anything to do with Minos.

Minerva is roman interpretation of Athena!

Мине́рва (лат. Minerva) — древнеримская богиня мудрости и войны, покровительница ремесленников, писателей, актёров, поэтов, художников, учителей, учащихся и врачей. Входила в триаду наиболее почитаемых богов Древнего Рима, вместе со своим отцом Юпитером и его женой Юноной. Её культ имеет этрусское происхождение и ведёт историю от местной (этрусской) богини Менрвы, которая в свою очередь взяла многое от древнегреческой Афины.

Афи́на (др.-греч. Ἀθηνᾶ или Ἀθηναία — Атхэнайа; микен. a-ta-na-po-ti-ni-ja: «Атана-владычица»[2]), также Афина Паллада (Παλλὰς Ἀθηνᾶ) — в древнегреческой мифологии богиня мудрости, военной стратегии и тактики, одна из наиболее почитаемых богинь Древней Греции, входившая в число двенадцати великих олимпийских богов, эпоним города Афины. Кроме того, богиня знаний, искусств и ремёсел[3]; дева-воительница, покровительница городов и государств, наук и мастерства, ума, сноровки, изобретательности.

Юно́на (лат. Iuno)  (греч. Ήρα) — древнеримская богиня[2], считавшаяся защитницей и особым советником государства. Римский "аналог" - Геры, жены Зевса.
В качестве покровительницы Рима и Римской империи Юнона называлась Регина («Королева»), и была членом Капитолийской триады (Юнона Капитолина), сосредоточенной на Капитолийском холме в Риме, включавшую также Юпитера и Минерву, богиню мудрости.
Вместе с остальными главными богами входила в Совет богов[3].
Её приравнивали к Гере, царице богов в греческой мифологии. Дочь Сатурна и Опы.
Сестра Плутона, Нептуна, Цереры и Весты.
Она была сестрой и женой Юпитера[2] и матерью Марса, Вулкана, Беллоны и Ювенты. Как и для Геры, её священным животным был павлин[4].
Её этрусским двойником была Уни[5], и, как говорили, она также присматривала за женщинами Рима[6].
После открытия скрижалей из Пирги в 1960-х указываются также параллели между Юноной и финикийской Астартой.
Воинственный аспект Юноны среди римлян проявляется в её одежде. Её часто изображали вооружённой и в плаще из козьей шкуры. Традиционное изображение этого воинственного аспекта было заимствовано у греческой богини Афины, которая носила козью шкуру или щит из козьей шкуры, называемый эгидой. Юнона также была изображена в диадеме.
Она всегда советовалась со своей «правой рукой» Минервой, богиней мудрости и искусств, а её «левой рукой» считалась Церера.
Считалось, что каждая женщина имеет свою Юнону (как каждый мужчина — своего Гения)[7].
В одной из своих ипостасей ассоциировалась с влагой, в том числе с влажностью воздуха. Ирида, олицетворение радуги, считалась её прислужницей.

These wiki pages, I should take them with caution, one tells that Minerva is Juno's daughter, and the other tells that she was her "right hand" and isn't mentioned among her children.

Уни — богиня в этрусской мифологии, супруга Тинии и мать Менрвы. Соответствует греческой Гере и римской Юноне.

У М Т (where the child is what matters:
so they're at her sides.
And now, since we found a triad, which is alphabetic, let's find what their names mean and if they were just translated into latin and greek to get the other names (those other names could be translated back into etruscan, but if abc is the pattern triads should follow (as urd vedandi sculd does, as some other triad does)

Juno is cognaate of Uni
Minerva is cognate of Menrva
only Tinia is not cognate of Jupiter.

Was Minerva Ju? Because piter is father. is no mother? mom ~ nun? I pull it here, but who knows

Jew?

eu rei

Was Jupiter Jew-father? Бог отец, которого европейцы хапанули до христианства.

Имя Тиния имеет этрусское происхождение[1] (от этрусского tin, что означает "день"[2]).




in some modern Bible translations, helel ben shahar (Isaiah 14:12) is translated as "morning star" or "day star" instead of Lucifer, reflecting the original Hebrew meaning and avoiding the later demonic connotation.
יב  אֵיךְ נָפַלְתָּ מִשָּׁמַיִם, הֵילֵל בֶּן-שָׁחַר; נִגְדַּעְתָּ לָאָרֶץ, חוֹלֵשׁ עַל-גּוֹיִם
שחר (рассвет, заря, смысл)
שכר (зарплата)
שקר (ложь, враньё, обман)
הֵילֵל (гимн)
הֵילל (вой)
הילל (вой)
ילל (вой, рыдание, вопль, завывание)


a e  i  o u
b f  j  p v
c g k q w
d h L R x
      m s y
       n t  z


A E I O U . n u
B F J P V
C G K Q W
D H L R X
       M S Y
       N T Z

итальянский:
A E  I  O U . n u
B F  L  P V
C G M Q Z
D H  N R
            S
            T

ирландский:
A E  I  O U . n u
B F  L  P V
C G M R Z
D     N S H
            T

Такой исландский выдал Грок мне. И он как будто выронил Т с места Θ, где ей вполне место.
Странно, что поиск по картинкам даёт другую версию (тоже без Q, но H как у англичан, после G, но вики доставляет:

The traditional Irish alphabet carved in Gaelic type on a building in Dublin, with each type of diacritic (síneadh fada and ponc séimhithe) as well as the Tironian et.
The vowels have some strokes above them, and why some consonants have dots I didn't know until I saw this:





Thinking of how 19 is the golden number of the runic calendar, it's hard not to wonder why there only 18 runes in bornholm and only 18 ljóð. What if 19th ljóð is some secret ljóð?




К слову о том, что аш (огоноь) превращается в ша (в шамаим)
Многие ли с ходу скажут ш это аш или ша? Многих может с бить с толку то, что аш это тоже буква. H(h) 
И это заставляет вспомнить о позиции буква h, которая больше подходит для ш (после ж? G = Ж?)

G = ☉ = Ж = Θ ?
not Gea, Gha?



7 double letters.. are they not 7 letter of the greek myth? ABHIOTY,.. was it BIOTA when only three vowels were (somewhere between one and five there had to be, considering how important three is for our culture and that could be around old-persian. And wasn't some proto-old-persian)



"То, что кажется хаосом, может являться постоянным соперничеством нескольких полузабытых традиций", сказал я во втором бумажном издательстве. И вспомнил это в контексте этих двух:

A   B   D 
E   F   Г   I?    
I    M   Λ      
О   П   Т  
U   𐌚   S               (в этой же традиции: U I   Ψ Ч    Г П   Р Ф   В Р   ᛒ ᚦ   ᛘ ᚴ   ᚠ ᚴ   ᛆ ᚮ    ᛁ ᚢ)

и

b d
p q

и ведь ещё третья есть:

б  В [b v]
Г  Z [g z]
Λ  Ν [l n]
P Ф  [p f]
C S  [k s]               (в этой же традиции: Ж К      Щ Ц     Ч Ш     Λ Ν      V W)


и  X V как часть более другой: I as one stroke, V as two strokes, X as two V's,
Were there L C D ? probably as hidden as L S D today, weren't mysteries all about drugs or sex, about things tabooed even today. Sometimes they were political. Maybe always political, as religions are.


rus ~ ruse, as if our national behavior is being.. сделал нас именем нарицательным. не совсем как jew, которое у нас не совсем таким словом. жидиться значит жадничать, а to jew значит обкрадывать. русские сами воры? въ ръъъ


considering how russian army acts in occupied buildings, rus they bring. рушить даже в русском crush.


I included some wild stuff in the corpus of my work. I intentionally did it because I didn't want plagiarists stealing my stuff, so weak minds would be averted by it. And now what if the same wild stuff averts potential friends and colleagues. I'm so cool, I definitely can do it on my own. But then I can always



榮  is  Kyūjitai form of 栄 (honour, glory, flourishing, prosperous, )

Kyūjitai is transliteration from Japanese 旧字体 (kyūjitai, literally “old character form”).

В упрощённом китайском 榮 превратилось не в 栄, но в 荣.
Не независимые рукоплескатели, а как бусинки на линии партии, и один из них purged.

> jews for jesus
as in jews instead of jesus? su being s.u. (short u)?


Grok доставляет:
Исторически количество муз в древнегреческой традиции варьировалось, и утверждение, что их изначально было три, имеет под собой некоторые основания, но требует уточнений:
Ранние источники: В архаический период (до V века до н.э.) количество муз действительно могло быть меньше девяти. Например, в некоторых ранних традициях, упомянутых в гомеровских гимнах (ок. VIII–VII вв. до н.э.), музы упоминаются как группа без точного числа, а в локальных культах, таких как в Беотии, их иногда называли тремя (Pausanias, Description of Greece, 9.29.1–2, trans. Jones, 1918). Например, на горе Геликон почитались три музы: Мелета (Размышление), Мнема (Память) и Аойда (Песнь).
Три как сакральное число: Число три было значимым в греческой и индоевропейской мифологии (например, три мойры, три грации), что могло способствовать раннему представлению о трёх музах. Однако в классической традиции (V–IV вв. до н.э.), закреплённой Гесиодом в Теогонии (Hesiod, Theogony, trans. Most, 2018), число муз стандартизировалось как девять: Каллиопа, Клио, Эрато, Евтерпа, Мельпомена, Полигимния, Талия, Терпсихора и Урания.
Оценка: Утверждение, что муз изначально было три, частично верно, так как в некоторых архаичных традициях их число могло быть три, но это не универсально. Девять муз стали каноническими в классической Греции, и переход от трёх к девяти, вероятно, связан с развитием пантеона и культурных функций муз.
    Ваша идея разделения муз на три группы (музыкальные, литературные, научные) логична, так как отражает их функции: музыка (Евтерпа, Терпсихора, Полигимния), литература (Каллиопа, Эрато, Талия), наука (Клио, Урания, Мельпомена). Однако это современная систематизация, а не античная традиция.
    В архаичных греческих и догреческих религиозных традициях музы, вероятно, происходили от единой божественной фигуры, связанной с вдохновением, знанием и памятью, которая со временем дифференцировалась в три, а затем в девять муз, отражая эволюцию мифологических и культурных представлений. Эта гипотеза опирается на косвенные свидетельства локальных культов, таких как почитание трёх муз — Мелеты, Мнемы и Аойды — в Беотии (Pausanias, Description of Greece, 9.29.1–2, trans. Jones, 1918), и на роль Мнемосины, богини памяти, как матери муз в классической традиции (Hesiod, Theogony, trans. Most, 2018). Мнемосина, воплощающая универсальное знание, может быть отголоском более ранней единой богини вдохновения, чьи функции позже распределились между музами, подобно тому, как минойские богини универсального характера трансформировались в более специализированные образы в греческой мифологии (Marinatos, Minoan Religion, 1993).Идея единой богини перекликается с индоевропейским архетипом тройственных женских божеств, таких как греческие мойры или скандинавские норны (Урд, Верданди, Скульд), которые также связаны с судьбой, знанием и творчеством (Dumézil, Gods of the Ancient Northmen, 1973).
Тройственная структура муз, зафиксированная в ранних культах, может отражать этот архетип, где три аспекта (например, размышление, память, песнь) представляют этапы творческого процесса или космического порядка. Аналогия с триединой богиней, например Гекатой, чья тройственная природа (небо, земля, подземный мир) символизирует целостность, поддерживает гипотезу о возможной связи муз с лунарными или универсальными богинями, хотя прямых текстовых свидетельств такой связи в греческой традиции нет (Johnston, Hekate Soteira, 1990). Современные реконструкции, такие как у Роберта Грейвса, предполагающие происхождение тройственных богинь от единой лунной богини, остаются спекулятивными, но вдохновляют сравнительный анализ (Graves, The White Goddess, 1948; Hutton, The Triumph of the Moon, 1999).Переход от единой богини к трём, а затем к девяти музам, канонизированным Гесиодом, вероятно, отражает усложнение культурных функций вдохновения — от универсального дара к специализированным искусствам (поэзия, музыка, история, астрономия). Эта эволюция параллельна индоевропейским традициям, где единые божества дробились на аспекты, как в случае с индийской Сарасвати, богиней мудрости и речи, чьи функции близки к роли муз (Kinsley, Hindu Goddesses, 1986). Связь муз с норнами, воплощающими судьбу и знание, подчёркивает их общий индоевропейский корень, где женские божества выступают посредниками между человеческим и божественным (Larrington, The Poetic Edda, 2014). Таким образом, реконструкция представлений о музах как происходящих от единой богини, возможно, связанной с памятью и вдохновением, опирается на архаичные культы, сравнительную мифологию и косвенные археологические данные, но требует осторожности в интерпретации, чтобы избежать необоснованных спекуляций.
It messed up with the division of 9 into three though:
My take was this:

Three muses are attributed to musical instruments:
         Clio: guitar (and history)
            Euterpe: flute (and dialects, courses?)
            Terpsichore: harp (dance, education)
  
Three muses are attributed to science:
      Thalia: geometry (architecture, agriculture, comedy(?))
      Polyhymnia: geometry (?) (grammar, mimic art, divine hymns)
      Ourania: astronomy (also observed in geometric lines)

Three others are about poetry:
       Calliope: heroic poetry (and rhetoric art)
       Erato: love poetry (love and weddings)
       Melpomene: tragedy (in poetry? melos,        rhetoric speech, compare to calliope!~)

Poetry was the literature (I heard or read, that prose is a modern thing)

Научные музы заинтересовали:

    Талия: геометрия (архитектура, сельское хозяйство (и комедия))
    Полигимния: геометрия (а также грамматика, искусство мимов, божественные гимны)
    Урания: астрономия (которая тоже во многом геометрия)

Талия геометрия на местности (внизу)
Урания геометрия на небе (наверху)
Полигимния сопоставляет геометрию грамматике? Рассматривалась грамматика с точки зрения геометрии? Каким образом? Тетракт как десять букв? три матери и 7 букв греческого мифа?


appalling as the opposite of appealing



A mindgame of asking question why (but Yanka wrote against it (wrote ~ рок к рок рот)

понимание трёх матерей позволило мне редуцировать язык, чтоб посмотреть как было, когнда количество гласных бы звуков было меньше.

когда ко ги да (это описка, но гид.. не not a slip. t yt  yt  не соскользунло)(


Europeans are writeing the epic of them. They cannot do it wihtout

That is how history goes. Those nations have conflict for centuries. Probably more.

Was the idea to stop it? One side would have to stop the fighting, just to see, who's the agressor.
And now they still fight, but we also fight, americans are seen as us.


A mindgame of asking question why to whaterver there is, and on and on and on is actually a great tool to pump up brains. What is it? A notebook. What is it doing here? I just used it. Why? Because I write into it when I have a wish. A magic noti notebook. Why? Because Brian Tracy recommended it. Why? Because I watched him speaking and I liked that one. Why? Because I want to be more. What do you mean? I want to build something bigger than myself. What do you mean? Something as awesome as it can be. Science is the best, so I apire to be scientist, especially because iq tests convinced me to be.

To do and to be. What are slight slick slim (there was a slip of  skun before slim, but is it's a direct multible, connected by the same slip of hand, slip.

Why do I write it? It is interesting. Interesting to me enough to write it. But what if I'm jdust high and everything is interesting to me? what if, that is something new (unknew, didn't know)



Isn't ankh (𓋹) a baby blood? Becu because ankh looks like a be baby//  or does it tell that immortality is via our children?
// instead of .. is also the slip. So if you see something weird, maybe it was a slip I didn't knotice.

(Jesus wasn't drank as a child. Yet they literally drink him. Figuratively, but also sorta literally. But then really they drink wine. Is it some symbolism about becoming like little children (which drunk people pretty much are. Is the covenant of the christianity is the alcohol consumption? Each cult has its poisons, and hardly it is a shallow coincidence that Putin's patriarch had monopoly on alcohol and tobacco. Opium for the masses. They're commies, they reconstructed the church under the commie rule, and no lustrations among their ranks either))

notice ~ knot-tice, knot-ice. ice заковывает. Так и knot заковывает? But what is it? a pseudo-mnemonic delirium even worse than mnemonics by

So  Slip of tongue: said мёдом instead of йодом. Внешне тоже немного похожи. Жидкий когда особенно, и тёмным тоже бывает. Может не таким тёмным, ну пеотому и не мёд, а йод. если то, что до м, и.

до ре ми фа солоь ля си
ут ре ми фа соль ля ти    ут как обращённое ти, ре как обращённое ля, ми как обращённая соль (мимими is the opposite of salty) And in the cente of it all, in the center of it all, your fu..
где недовольны, там компенсируется тем, что это ляляля. а там где милуешь, там и ругай. tell what is right, set the right, be straigh, but мил.

до и си could be до and съ.

ре ми фа соль ля written right to left would make sense of re for the right and la for theleft.
then фа is for 中 (chink read it as джон, japs read it as naka and also as чу or цю (that is how they botcher the chinese john. даже не джо, а чу (ちゅう is also kiss in japanese (and also 注 the annotations, explonatary notes, comments (thus my second edition is full of kisses) and then there's of course 中 which is medium size, average grade, middle; in, within, out of, among; during, while; currently, in the middle of; middle way, moderation; second volume of three; junior high school, middle school; China. And there's also 宙 which is space, air, midair; from memory, by heart. And a form of space is 駐 which is the parking space (the horse and the same phonetic as in the annotation) and 忠 which is loyalty, devotion, fidelity, faithfulness; inspector of the imperial prosecuting and investigating office.  ちゅう without kanji is kiss, squeak (of a mouse), with a slurp, Chu (Russia) wtf.
Then there's 柱 which is cilinder, prism; bridge (of koto, whatever it means). Then there's чу the 籌, which is wooden skewer used for counting, whatever it means. 誅 is death penalty. 厨 is internet troll, nerd, freak, addict, fag. And also 酎 which is short for shōchū (See also 焼酎). And then there are  ちゅうちゅう and also チュー チュー   which is a noun for mouse in "children language", and adverb for squeak, cheep, peep; slurp; sucking noisily​
Why don't they teach us the children language first? Wouldn't it be where the basis of the language lies? See how many chus, and it's a mouse. В русском даже не знают как мышь говорит, русские дети вроде не называют мышь чучу. чучело мы знаем, но что это за зверь не осознаём. Чучело-мяучело это мышекошка? беспонтовая кошка, которая орёт так, что непонятно чучело это или мяучело и даже похуй. Чучелом мяучело мы обзываем, предлагая самоубиться или это совпадение или вообще относительно недавнее от кого-то знающего китайский или подобный ему язычок))


живой, 活, hwo (ж~ᚼ)
             話 язык, речь
но давай весь текст сюда вставим (выстегнуло, когда племяннице китайский объяснял)
Инициали и финали отвлекают от одного удивительного факта: в китайском каждый иероглиф это один слог. Даже такие как живой, 活, hwo (современное написание: 话) Обрати внимание на левую и правую части этого иероглифа. Одна передаёт идею, обозначая воду (水 (шуй, как в фен-шуй (фен это буквально ветер, китайское изобретение веер))) типа течёт. вторая передаёт звучание (но 舌 (язык) читается как шен. Может это намёк на другой иероглиф: 生 (шенг(на самом деле что-то между шон и шом (звуки у нас с ними одинаковые лишь условно)) (рождён (как язык из рта?))) потому что 生活 [шенг-hwо] значит жизнь (или, быть может, это иллюстрация: язык к воде значит пить, может пить~быть, как есть~есть)

вот более чёткий пример: 
иероглифы хороши, что большинство их совпадает и в японском и в китайском:
в японском и китайском 語 означает язык. Читается по-разному. В японском он го. И фонетической (звуковой) частью является правая: в правом верхнем углу поместили 五, которая точе читается как го (и обозначает 5) правая часть похожа на GO, и считается что совпадение, или даже "не думай об этом" но вполне может быть ещё не открытым пока межкультурным влиянием. Квадраты на самом деле означают рот: 口, т.е. слева смысловая часть изображает рот и звук из него выходящий.
 В китайском 語 читается как Yǔ (ю пятым тоном, что похоже на юю (самое близкое к двум слогам для одного иероглифа что я знаю)
В то время как 五 читается как Wǔ (похоже на уу, а в традиционном китайском гугл читает аж как уоо, т.е. три слога (но считается что это одна гласная таким тоном, в котором звук тише и снова громче, словно "v" над ǔ это схема того как надо произносить))
Ещё один иероглиф: речь, слова, диалект, не yǔ, но hwa: 話 (здесь обе части смысловые)
言  Yán (йен) говори (say, speak, talk)

живой, 活, hwo ((дальше рассуждение о том могли ли в прожлом живой и hwo быть одним словом) в варяжских рунах похожая на ж руна ᚼ передаёт звук х, как j в английском дж (и й) а в испанском h. В каких-то варяжских (норвежских, быть может немецких) языках точно так же выглядящая руна ᛡ транслитерируется как й)


    In the book I say that several paleohispanic runes are like norsk, and six is several,
but the list on the right only has ᛋ and ᚲ with the same graphics and phonetics. It has many more phoenician influence.
Their M reiminds ᛘ more than M, and so does the M'
But then look at di/ti, it's probably ᛉ[z, ks]

their L is the same as in greek, Λ, and in norsk context it is common to ᚱ and ᚢ(ł)

and ᛊ is present in greco-iberian (to the left here) and their R's are even closer to ᚱ, these make them four or five already, then there's ᛁ here, and once again (the other time was the Hyginus's account) Η, and not Ε, is the vowel. It is O in paleo-hispanic. What sort of letter is it? H the He? Он in paleo-hispanic and E in greco-iberian.

Both sets have similar R's and D's (Du/Tu of the paleo-hispanic.

Isn't it lovely that greco-iberian almost exactly repeats the set of doubles from sefer yetzirah? gk, td, b.. and no p, but n (in russian п[p] looks like n (both look exactly the same in cursive: n & п)) and two R's, as in the doubles R for no good reason, and is it extended set of the doubles? For here L doubles R (I don't take diacritized form for a separate letter, thus they have 15 of them, and isn't it the set of Carmenta? In this context one of the S's is Z. And they are literally Ϻ and Σ. And what they considered R is probably П. And L is their R (Λ is their ᚱ) and N double that L? The either way. Those R's are the least greek letters in greco-iberic, so why not suspect them ot be of being Π^ι and Π making so much sense in the context.

What I did here is I combined sefer yetzirah with greco-iberian. Considering how that book is one of the basic levels of jewish culture and paleo-hispanic has so many letters similar to phoenician (which is basically hebrew) it is a hypothesis not too much stretched.

The paleo-hispanic 𐤍 is phoenician-like. And basically that's it. But then 𐤓 is alike. And that paleohispanic 𐤓 is like a roll, round, rolling something, a coin rolling around the axis which is shown with the vertical line. So it felt. As if it's a ball on a stift set on the top of the Λ
And thus they are opposed as circle and triangle. And before I saw it, I saw Λ as Λуч. I dare to use russian words in the context because of cognates, I sugest a cognate of russian Λуч to be at play here, some form of the word light, light and луч are cognates.

𐤓 could be mirror, because they're traditionally round, then the lower bar is the handle.

In the context of paleo-hispanic, oghamic order makes sense, in that their Ba, looking like |, makes sense only as b being the first letter (or, at least, first consonant)

Let's post it again to see it here:


B L N makes sense as a sequence, since Ba is one stroke, L is two strokes, N is three strokes.



















прошлый прожлый прожитой



to kick someone's ass is осадить кого-то. И в этом смысле зад = сад. And sit is of to aSs.

sit, just as beat, then, includes that ть suffix, even with to.
because to beat is бить, but to sit is сидеть, сядь, but then the suffix is doubled, as if we borrowed that word from the west.
to sit ~ сидеть
to meat ~ (при)метить (?)

sit ~ сядь
stay ~ стой        but beat is бей.

o may look like ǝ when handwritten, and it sounds alike. Thus isn't ǝ a botched o? To transfer the botched o sound? And what is e then? as well? botched a? this a: a
Thus o and a are ǝ adn e
ǝ is a then.
e is e.
In the context of the ☯  (o is a, for ⴰ is a)

This is for the second edition of the paper book.
The Taijitu, commonly known as the Yin Yang symbol, is represented by the Unicode character U+262F ☯. It's a visual representation of the concept of taiji (太極), which embodies the duality and interdependence of opposing forces like yin and yang. This symbol is central to Chinese philosophy and cosmology, particularly within Taoism.


Looking at how jewtube erases video on antitumor effects of thc, it's clear that Wooddraw Willson (I doubled d and l for showing the possible meaning of his names) outlawed weed the same year he gave away the printing press were not a coincidental, kikes do want to keep weed illegal. They want you doumb


Thinking of Carmenta's 15, I thought of 16 of paleo-hispanic (the one given in the booklet)
and how they have one letter doubled by diacritics, and how in this it reminds younger futhark:
(short-twig)ᚠᚢᚦᚭᚱᚴ᛬ᚽᚿᛁᛆᛌ᛬ᛐᛓᛙᛚᛧ: younger fuþark (8c.~11c.) ᚠᚢᚦᚬᚱᚴ᛬ᚼᚾᛁᛅᛋ᛬ᛏᛒᛘᛚᛦ(long-twig)
ᚠᚢᚦᚬᚱᚴ᛬ᚼᚾᛁᛅᛋ᛬ᛐᛒᛘᛚᛦ later younger fuþark (11c~13c.) ᚡv ᚤy,ö ᚧð ᚵg,ng ᛀN ᛂe,ä ᛑd ᛔp ᛛL
ᚠᚢᚦᚮᚱᚴ᛬ᚼᚿᛁᛆᛋ᛬ᛐᛒᛘᛚᛦmedieval fuþark(13~16c)ᚡv ᚤy,v ᚧð ᚰǫ,å ᚵg ᚶng ᛀn ᛀN ᛂe ᛅä ᛍc ᛎz ᛑd ᛔp ᛕp ᛛL
which ends with ᛦ, which is actually reversed ᛘ, and notice that other letters are unique even when reversed. Even ᚾ and ᛅ. So that could be placed their by their enemies,


J в испанском Х[h], а Х в португальском Ш
(это к слову о том, что Hh могло ознвачяать Ш)


heden is today in dutch. It's as if hebrew's he for the and russian день for den
    more common word for today in dutch is vandaag (of day (to=of? (english to is dutch of



I see abcde at the right top corner and I can see what is possibly opqrst at the end of that line, but then how do I know it was rewritten from the stone correctly? I must examine the stone closer and in person.
And how would I know that the stone is truly ancient?

So I avoid using paleographic data, because modern data is too real to be forgery, and if there are, there are even more of real deal. Just as armenian was the exception only to reveal itself being a later modification of the same based european pattern.



infancy ~ in fancy



The shortest words keep some secrets. I felt it for some time,

by to  (b.a.  t.u. (alphabetic order: the beginning of the alphabet read from its centre, end of archaic, arcane, arccotangens whatever it means))
of to (op tu (the beginning ant the end of the fourth line))
от до (было оно таково, что t~f as θ? or was it voiceless and voiced as cd? c~ч~т~t, d~g~g~c)

c~ч~т~t и d~g~g~c like считать и догадываться

If I substitute как for like (like is as icecream, как is as как, even as is not as dirty a word)



24000 tons is 26500 us tons  (not as insane as long and short scales of the large numbers, but goes in the same book as them)


united ~ you and I


ёрш ~ ёж



What if those short words have vowels as the main parts and consonants only ground them as they can?
(this thought came to me this morning just before I woke up)
then in would be [i] the way jewish v is i in russian? Was in the first and? As if they killed a beast and when the beast just ate some deer, they would also consider the deer as a bonus?
of and об are both o and that also justifies of being от.
об is от? for of is both об and от.
Technically, vowels are better heard than consonants. And my daddy only pronounced vowels (it took him some effort to pronounce consonants) right before he died (a day or a couple of days right prior)
And I even understood him by the context sometimes: аы́ for воды, а́ы for хватит (which is very similar for nurmal language's аа́ for да and а́а for нет)



wife [waif] want if

монах [манах] маму нах. ма в смысле бабаб  (аба эс зы оппосит от п м баба)
m0onk [ mom nk? no care? let's test it against rhyming words: sink: sea нахуй когда тонешь (нахуй всмысле не нужно, не хочу. -ха как хочу. нах значит не хочу. на = не? funk: no ifs? fuk if want. wife is when if// want if. so, I sugested that fe is fu, both are if. or what if some of them is for? or of? funk is an euphemism of fuck. funk is something eerie. )

what if wife is actually with+for or something? Is жена съ+на? or is жена нужена, где же это не хочется как хо, а желается, и ж в нужно. не желанно? нужно. ?

ну как очень а не как неочень?  это правило первых ассоциаций бьющих в цель.

wi in wife is wo in woman. Is fe a synonym of man? in which language? This part is me seeking, take it with a grain of salt. Though wife as waif makes tons of sense. life as laif, what is la? like. If you like it, it is life, it is love, it is laugh.

Okay, it's raw, yet may be promising, will revisit it later.


WhatsApp is a great brand name. So cool it is that it's capable of pushing "what's up" our out of use.
And wondering about what could be their monetization, it seems obvious that they sell our data to the data brokers whoever those are. And suddenly I don't really care: if fsb can read it, those guy cannot deserve such privilege any less.



Having read how Mendeleev did it, it only seems natural to make a mind map to give all my teaching in one panel, and do it short and simple.

Three national myths of the creation of the alphabet.
And their implications.



Political life of russia is shit because there are only мразь и трус. Мразь может и не понимает того, что она мразь, мразь простая форма жизни, а трус-то понимает может быть, с него и спрос, ведь допустил такой брадак. бардак.
Но труса можно понять, грязь и мразь бесцеремонна, может и вальнуть по беспределу.
Значит нужно осторожней со зверем, не злить его понапрасну (без мазы = без ма́зи?) а следовать правило "ругай друзей лично (с глазу на глаз) а хвали публично" и исходи из того, что у вас у всех в целом общие цели, а потому вы все там (в политике) друзья.

Трус должен взять на себя ответственность (потому что и у балбесов желание избежать ответственности есть)


цель ~ hole ~ goal ~
целый ~ whole ~ overall ~
(могут расходиться цели в нюансах, но раз части единой системы, то должны работать на общее благо (на благо системы (в которую должно включить всех членов общества, но, увы, мразь беспокоится лишь о себе, а трусы слишком пассивны чтоб возражать (пассивны как пидоры, может потому тех кто там пидорами за глаза называют))))


to settle ~ to sell

Weren't consonants an abomination? Didn't we speak in vowels? We still can. With consonants, not so much, but on the other hand consonants can transmit meaning even more than vowels: text without vowels are way l easier to decypher than text witheout consonants.

And which consonant may transmit meaning:

ц (цыканье с целью привлечь внимание)


thinking of how B & D are 8 & o and how o is ⴰ and that d looks like a because it is or rather was,
and there appears the idea of B being Ⱁ, and the alphabet being some ⴰⰑⴰⰑⴰⰑⴰⰑⴰⰑⴰⰑ with changing diacritics. ⴰⰑ could be yes and no, white and black, man and woman, boy and girl (isn't it interesting that b has one bubble while g has two? Is it because of these two silly words? Different tradition bring in not only different words, but also different ways to write letters.


ⴰⰑⴰⰑⴰⰑⴰⰑⴰⰑⴰⰑ ~ aBcgefch.. well, maybe not that simple.
ⴰⰑⰡ maybe? but EFГ tells that ⰡⰑⴰ would be more it. and Ⱑ is a proto я, я was аз, and so was а.
ⴰ is both c and D in this context (just as Ⱁ divided in russian into б & в)
And why is that number is  coubntndown?
CBА could be ЭЮЯ
EFГ or ГFE are not much as ЪЫЬ though, but the Г in Ъ is pretty cool, ngl. And E is the best pair to Ь in the three, for both palatalize, and then ы is f, which can be seen as Y~ 𐤅

So aren't ЪЫЬ the ГFE? some vowel representation of them? I gamble this possibility of vowels being first (since it is in Ovm, in abc, in ams, and greek seven have five vowels)

The idea of the primary vowels came to me like a lightning, so fast, and then it takes way more time than to write it down.


Ⱑ is т in triangle, as if T is for triangle (a side and the hight (s&h?)) and it looks like the masonic pyramid (not natural mountain in such a shape, but a built one, as in egypt, as in the united satets)

so is Ⱑ a or т? я and т are both final letters.
яюэ
АYE?  ауе such a powerful slogan. What do they know? Is it a weird coincidence, showing the real russian spirit. Soviet spirit, since they all mixed up. The riff raff are dirty in all accounts.

Я безумен лезть в такие дали, but someone had to go this far.

Ⱑ is 3
B is 2
Г is 1 as in гаплоидный

E ~ 3
F is for futa
Г is I
(the vertical stave is stav)

E ~ 三   
F ~ 二
Г ~ 一

三: San & Mi are the S&M I was looking for thinking of how Ϻ and M came into being (as ᛘ&ᛉ)

ᛘ&ᛉ are perfect glyphs for three

So did europeans borrowed those concepts from chinese and japanese.
And how comes that the archaic Ϻ comes from chinese, but modern M comes from japanese?
Naturally, we communicated with both (naturally they closed their borders not because nobody was visiting them. Japanese they are. Japonais~Японец)

I went to put that 三 thing into MϺ file, and to my surprise one of the first things there was

So maybe not out of japanese, maybe out of the indo-european mountain, mount, но в русском горы не называются на м, а потому вся это индо-европейская хуйня лженаучная теория.
Грубо я позволял себе называть всю гумантиарщину лженаучной, но очевидно что лженаучными являются лишь течения в них, ведь много крутых челов в лингвистике было, и я тоже в ней, между прочим.


э как оклик
а как понимание
о как удивление
у как сильное удивление
и как восторг
е как тоже восторг (yeah)
я как я, близко к е.
ё усиление от японии до америки
ю как you, и йотизация это уже не чистые гласные, и смысл сложней, не эмоции, не междометия, но местоимения даже.

а также среднее между и и но (and & but, and maybe a cognate of and (ᛆ~ᚿ? (подтверждается a как приставкой отрицания)))
о также об, about
у также at
и также and


я являющаяся пятым монобуквенным гласным словом говорит о том, что оно е, когната jeFR.

а
я
и
о
у

о~у (at ~ a-t ~ about) у дома ~ около дома (о дома не скажут по каким-то тайным соображениям. около дома надо говорить, но это полная синонимия фразы "у дома". О доме это уже подразумевает рассказ о доме. Некий семантический сдвиг или что это такое

а я був еж и по простому

а я уо

аз Б-Г  (я ио, я ио БГ)
je the you would be nice here. like you веди, веди́? ве́дай? вези? вывози? жиза? ежз
а бг де жз и кл мн? french de? greek καλ? english man? всё остальное типа русское? что это за язык был? тот, от которого остались лишь осколки ставшие разными языками?
Είμαι ο θεός της ζωής και των καλών ανθρώπων
Не потому ли кл поперёк м влезли, что грамматика поменялась и прилагательные стали ставиться перед существительными?

je is I in french and you in dutch (yet this thing I rediscovered, it is listed in the file about pronouns)


Или, если всё по-русски прочесть (русский же алфавит)
аз бог (de is deus?)
eсть (literally the name of the letter (and is бог book? or boogey? god of one is devil of another))
жиз(а/и[ы]) (не потому ли русское т также т, что форма первого лица от слова есть есть есмь)
и коль ман (коль добавлено для обусловливания веры? для создания условий столь любимых религиями. А до того было бог жизни и мэна (но мэн это такое русское что просто охуеть))
о прст (просто (про сто (по простому? прост?)))
и дальше идёт видимо продолжение, для которого вставили коль.



Doesn't Ⱍ look like something opening the Ⱑ?

Ⱍ is ч, and they call that letter червь, but that could be an enmious reading,
because ч is for читать, этв that is pretty much what the letter looks like: the head at the bottom in front of the open book at the top. But were there books like this then? could it be two scroll's rolls at the side? and two pages open at once. Very nice. then Ч is also that. And it may look like a hand holding a book in front of the face, if the stav is the body.

Before (ort was it after) I got high, I asked myself what I want to think of when I get high, and the correct answer came to me, that since gods are at play, they know better what to tell me. And thus Ч was very soon revealed (reveal ~ releave)

ᚴ is for книга
ᚵ is for gnosis

thus isn't Ⱑ three scrolls, a perfect number in which to keep them if in bundles.
And thus triangular numbers make perfect sense.
And that led me to believe that tetraktis could be ten scrolls, but nobody mentions that such collection ever existed. There are ten scrolls of Rigveda, but hardly could Pythagoras have it in mind. There are also ten canons of chinese mathematics, but though it speaks of Pythagorean math, it is written much later. We discussed it with Grok, and I got the impression that pseudo-pythagorean literature is the pythagorean literature. At least the closest to it we get.



Since glagolitic is so powerful, let's look into it more:

are those balls all rolls? Well, one of them is head, if we understood Ⱍ correctly. and there's also Ⱖ[ё]

Ⱖ & ё look so much alike, with those .. at the top.

If Ⱖ and Ⱍ indeed depict different stages of the same process, then what is Ⱖ? a reader who just closed the book or only about to open it? or are both those letters of J? Also because ⰉⰊⰋ are all different forms of I.

Ⰷ[z] is for знание, which three scrols may symbolize.

If wiktionary doesn't disinforms, Ⰺ is the initial form of Ⰹ, hm..
Ⰻ is also и[i], and I can only wonder how they didn't confuse it with Ⱁ[o]

Wiktionary also told me to compare it to ዌ ETHIOPIC SYLLABLE WEE
Modified form of ወ (w). And that ወ is definitely both В and Ф.
ወ ETHIOPIC SYLLABLE WA
ዋ ETHIOPIC SYLLABLE WAA  (this one is of Ф even more so)

ሀሁሂሃሄህሆሇለሉሊላሌልሎሏሐሑሒሓሔሕሖሗመሙሚማሜምሞሟፙሠሡሢሣሤሥሦሧረሩሪራሬርሮሯፘሰሱሲሳሴስሶሷሸሹሺሻሼሽሾሿቀቁቂቃቄቅቆቇቈቊቋቌቍቐቑቒቓቔቕቖቘቚቛቜቝ
በቡቢባቤብቦቧቨቩቪቫቬቭቮቯተቱቲታቴትቶቷቸቹቺቻቼችቾቿኀኁኂኃኄኅኆኇኈኊኋኌኍነኑኒናኔንኖኗኘኙኚኛኜኝኞኟአኡኢኣኤእኦኧከኩኪካኬክኮኯኰኲኳኴኵኸኹኺኻኼኽኾዀዂዃዄዅ
ወዉዊዋዌውዎዏዐዑዒዓዔዕዖዘዙዚዛዜዝዞዟዠዡዢዣዤዥዦዧየዩዪያዬይዮዯደዱዲዳዴድዶዷዸዹዺዻዼዽዾዿጀጁጂጃጄጅጆጇገጉጊጋጌግጎጏጐጒጓጔጕጘጙጚጛጜጝጞጟ
ጠጡጢጣጤጥጦጧጨጩጪጫጬጭጮጯጰጱጲጳጴጵጶጷጸጹጺጻጼጽጾጿፀፁፂፃፄፅፆፇፈፉፊፋፌፍፎፏፚ፝፞፟ፐፑፒፓፔፕፖፗ፠።፣፤፥፦፧፨፩፪፫፬፭፮፯፰፱፲፳፴፵፶፷፸፹፺፻፼

ዐ is ETHIOPIC SYLLABLE PHARYNGEAL A
(which is cognatic with O and ⴰ (and also ⵔ, but less so in phonetic sense, but maybe ⵔ is large ⴰ (кРик, cRy, scReam (not haul, but with the расщепление)))
በ is B and it looks like П
ሀ is H and it doesn't look like it, but then H & П are alike, they just had a weird way to show it.
ለ is L and looks liket that.
ሐ (ḥ or ḥä) and it looks like double h, and also like ᛦ[(y)r](or ᛣ[q]) and if I go for cognatism, ᛣ
መ (m or mä) and wiktionary informs: Corresponds to South Arabian 𐩣.

And indeed both ethiopean and old south arabian go in halaham order:

𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩯 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 𐩽 𐩾 𐩿 ancient south arabian

And here 𐩡 is of different tradition, not greek, but norsk, runic. It is just like ᛚ (they write the other way around, and when norsk runes did too,

(this one goes right to left)
𐩠𐩡𐩢𐩣𐩤𐩥𐩦𐩧𐩨𐩩𐩪𐩫𐩬𐩭𐩮𐩯𐩰𐩱𐩲𐩳𐩴𐩵𐩶𐩷𐩸𐩹𐩺𐩻𐩼𐩽𐩾𐩿
The graphic side is almost totally different, but some proximity remains.
So, compare
𐩠 and ሀ (ancient arabian version has the handle, whatever it is, maybe mirror or cup (the first mirror?))
𐩡 and ለ
𐩢 and ሐ
𐩣 and መ  (those are the same object without importance of which way to put them)
Buy after them the orders diverge: 𐩤[q] and ሠ[ś] (arabic s is 𐩦, which unifies Σ and Ш (and 𐩤 is a variant of q, and collecting all the cognatic glyphs, we should be able to see their initial meaning))
𐩥 is arabic w and in it reflects ወ which doesnt' appear in ethiopean for half an alphabet more.
Then the orders meet again:
𐩧 and ረ are both R
𐩨 and ሰ maybe? only 𐩨 is B, and ሰ is S and maybe is of ሠ and ረ was later inserted between them?
ሸ is š (and is told to be modified ሰ)
ቀ is ḳ and maybe is cognate to ancient arabic 𐩤[q]
ቐ is x̣ (thus that upper part which looks like H acts just like that, as a palatalizer (maybe it was to show the horizontal bone in the skull? the palate, нёбо))
𐩨 and በ are cognates, both are B (even though they look like П. It tells that voiced and voiceless were the same letter, different regions just read them differently and normalized them differently when they started to distinguish those variants as different phonemes)
ቨ is V, as H would turn P into F.
𐩩 and ተ are both T (and look alike. Arabian variant is just as it is in some old hebrew, and ethiopean is closer to european form)
ቸ is č
ኀ is ḫ
ነ is n (does that initial stroke matters in both case? h and n are like ኀ and ነ, but what are they?)
ኘ is ñ (well, here n of  ̃  reminds how russian Н is N, what are they? He & оН?)
አ (ʾ or ʾä)
ከ is k, and wiktionary tells it is a reflection of ancient arabic 𐩫
yet arabic had this: 𐩪[s] before it, and no ethiopean counterpart can be seen so far.
ኸ (x)
South arabic 𐩬 is ነ in ethiopean, the order fluctuates, and maybe thus we can see the basis of both.
𐩭 (ḫ) it looks very much like ኘ the ñ, onece agan referrint to similarity between H and N
Yet ኀ the ḫ corresponds to the ancient south arabic 𐩭 the ḫ as wikitionary writeously tells.
Ancient arabic goes like this
𐩮 (ṣ)
𐩯 (s)
𐩰 (f) and maybe thus it meets ethiopean ወ [w]
Ancient arabic goes with these
𐩱 (ʾ) and this is the cognate of አ (ʾ or ʾä) but they're at different spots
𐩲 (ʿ) this one is directly reflected by ethiopic ዐ
𐩳 (ḍ) but ethiopic ዘ is z, while ዠ is ž (is it the very H which they palatalize the other letters with, so that instead of repeating it, they did that)
𐩴 (g) and it could be the reflection of that ዠ the ž, as G can be both.
𐩵 (d) and what is this abgd doing here? It's as the beginning of the alphabetic sequence is hidden here.
𐩶 (ġ)
𐩷 (ṭ) and reminds its own 𐩳 (ḍ)
𐩸 (z)
𐩹 (ḏ) and in that is told to be a prototype of ethiopean ዘ the z, but 𐩸 is not too far.
𐩺 and የ are both y
𐩻 (ṯ)
𐩼 (ẓ)

Now let's check the rest of ethiopean:
ዸ (dd)
ጀ (ǧ)
ገ is g, just as 𐩴 is in ancient arabic
ጘ (ŋ)
ጠ (ṭ) and is told to be a reflection of 𐩷
ጨ (č)
ጰ (p̣)
ፀ (ṣ́) is told to be a reflection of 𐩳, though it's ḍ
ፈ (f) and wiktionary tells that it corresponds to 𐩰, and I can imagine that bubble to be rhombic, but what are they?
ፐ (p) weird, what is it even.

𐩿           𐩾         𐩽          𐩼𐩻𐩺𐩹𐩸𐩷       𐩶𐩵𐩴𐩳𐩲𐩱𐩰𐩯𐩮𐩭𐩬𐩫𐩪𐩩  𐩨          𐩧𐩦𐩥𐩤𐩣𐩢𐩡𐩠
ሀለሐመ    ሠረሰሸቀቐበቨተቸ  ኀነኘአከኸወ ዐዘዠየደዸጀገጘጠጨጰፀፈፐ
The group 𐩭𐩬𐩫
reflected by ኀነኘአከ shows that such reconstruction can have variants, it's only the first approach.
But basically it seems like 12 letters share their position (the variants may include including into thiose 12 way more similar 𐩴 and ገ instead of rather differently looking 𐩵 and ደ, etc.
And wouldn't they easily be 13, since 𐩱 and አ share the position between two corresponding "solids"?!
These 13 could easily be of some prehistoric calendar. Though maybe I shouldn't call such things pre-historic, since technically what I'm doing is history.



ᛆᛒᚦᛂ[e](not ᚽ[h])ᚠᚵᚼ[h](or ᛡ[й, а (e(ᛂ)?)])ᛁᚴᛚᛘ[m](not ᛉ[z, ks])ᚿᚮᚱᛦ[(y)r](or ᛣ[q])ᛋᛏᚢ  bornholm runes
ᚠᚡᚢᚣᚤᚥᚦᚧᚨᚩᚪᚫᚬᚭᚮᚯᚰᚱᚲᚳᚴᚵᚶᚷᚸᚹᚺᚻᚼᚽᚾᚿᛀᛁᛂᛃᛄᛅᛆᛇᛈᛉᛊᛋᛌᛍᛎᛏᛐᛑᛒᛓᛔᛕᛖᛗᛘᛙᛚᛛᛜᛝᛞᛟᛠᛡᛢᛣᛤᛥᛦᛧᛨᛩᛪ᛫᛬᛭ᛮᛯᛰᛱᛲᛳᛴᛵᛶᛷᛸ
(here I played with single-double-triple, or rather 0-1-2 sequences)
ᚢᚱᛒ
ᛁᚴᚠ
ᛁᚴᛘ
ᛁᛆᚮ
ᛁᛅᚯ
ᛁᛅᚼ
ᛁᛅᛡ
is ᚼ[h] = ᛉ[z, ks] + ᛣ[q] ?
ᛁᛚᚨ
ᛁᛚᛏ
ᚬ and ᚯ are the same rune, seriously? why not ᚾ and ᛅ then? Or are they both ã as they are the same as prefixes of negation?
ᛁᚾᚼ
ᛁᚾᛡ


and here I played with the letters sharing positions in different alphabets and what words could be behind them:
Gnosis ~ Знание (only gnosis is the greek word, and they have Ζ instead of G there)
Fat ~ Жир
Иглa ~ Needle (only russian g is d, so.. but who knows how much waltzed those letters and words)


You might wonder what is the meaning of such games. The answer is sometimes they deliver.
(though these two came to me without me being high, so they're not as cool as Ч for Читать)


Racians are Dacians the Thracians.
(naturally, it is only a hypothesis, but it is based upon the reason of nation not likely to rebrand all of the sudden and utterly, a slight change in reading is more likely. And russians are not true russians. Rusins are. Ukrainians may tell you more about how moscovites usurped the term for political ends)



Terence McKenna tells that the only alchemists who tried to turn base metals into gold were charlatans.
(which is natural, but he's a professor, so I expect him to read the book. Me on the other hand, I ever read whole books now, I only look them up in the google search results. The professors of the past (his generation was the last) didn't have the priviledge of the internet. It all changed, and since I make it my own way (not top, not wrong way; but I got the message, good one)
What were the chances that my brother sent me a video about his stoned ape theory where they mention his name directly exactly when I was wathcing that one.
Let's check.
I watched the video 7:48 PM to around 8:36 PM, he sent it to me 11:01 PM
hm.. probably youtube saw us both online, and felt like making a connection, no need to report telepathy on that, though even coincidence may happen. First calculate how many time of your life you think of that man (hardly ever, maybe ten times in decades, as once per year. the three hour lag. 1 to 3652.5 and then consider how many events happen and how often such telepathies occur (not even that often, maybe 1 to 3652.5 days as well. but more like 365.25 (once a year at least, I guess. not at least, more likely that in general it is such, ) As often as I think of that guy? This time it just coincided. Other times it's something else, thus you have to multiply the occurance rate to the quantity of videos seen in three hours)
once again, I suck at math. The probability of that event is ..whatever



𓂝         D36    U+1309D    forearm (palm upwards)    
    arm (ꜥ)
    cubit (mḥ)
    ꜥ     Uniliteral sign representing Egyptian ayin
                Possibly ancestral to Proto-Sinaitic Yodh and its descendants

I collage, collect teh (те (fluidity of letters in a word speaks to me, and links the and те (and le))) 


𓂝 is [a] and thus of arm.
    And that should be in the egyptian primer.

Primers of different writing systems for different languages.

Japanese primer can be insane. I should link it to russian and other european glyphs
(the mnemonic way, on the basis of the table I gave earlier)



𓂩         D47    U+130A9    hand with palm up    
    hand (ḏrt)
    receive (sšp, šsp)




𓅼         G52    U+1317C    goose picking up grain    
    to feed (snm)
Here I would link it to семена (с переставленными н и м, такое случается (morph ~ form, ))





𓈣         NL4    U+13223    Nome sign with shield, crossed arrows, and sedge    
    Southern Neith (nt-rst)        4th Nome of Lower Egypt (NL004)

𓈤         NL5    U+13224    Nome sign with shield, crossed arrows, and papyrus plant    
    Northern Neith (nt-mḥt)        5th Nome of Lower Egypt (NL005)
𓈥        NL5a    U+13225    Nome sign with shield, crossed arrows, and whip upon bread loaf    
    Northern Neith (nt-mḥt)        5th Nome of Lower Egypt

This is a way to learn that rst is south and mḥt is north.
But ᛘ[m](or ᛉ[z, ks]) and ᛦ[(y)r](or ᛣ[q]) is not for that egyptian primer. For my personal yes.

mḥt could be a cognate of мороз (and as the opposite of rasta, махач (two words to remember))
ᛘ
ᛦ
rst is definitely rasta, because it is the best thing about them.

That mḥt also reminds norht, and cognatism of north and мороз I noticed before.

ḥ~r? hlrm? (right next to left!~ (high left, right маленький (как происходит войсковое построение)))
(and do jews read from left, because they're all in end (мы все в конце как один из них пел))
(был летов евреем? он мог эпатажа ради это говорить. но батя у него комми идеологом работал)

Doesn't the surname Orlove exposes l in Oryol as catch, ловлю ~ люблю (litttle l (penis? slit?))
and or is a word for mouse? not ore. What if ore was everything taken of land? орало, агро, орошать. россия орошает, росами богата? слезами тоже.  огорошает, огорчает.

mḥt
мир
ᛘ
ᛦ
резня  (пары букв, с которыми много слов-антонимов, статистически не можно ли их всех найти)
rst


4chan ~ fortune    (whatever it means. I wonder how I never noticed it, until I heard that word)



резня ~ рознь ~ разница
(резать ~ разделять (делать раз ~ делать рез (морфемы схожи и звучанием и смыслом, а потому и родство этих морфем вижу, но лишь время покажет верна ли эта гипотеза. Время затраченное на изучение этого вопроса может сократить это время. решение от резать? разрешение. роды. схватки не рези же. разные различные розничные (вот это сейчас было неожиданно, но в точку)))
Но резной и разный, разные слова же.
(, is way more available than —, thus — is about to die off (why ambiguous about maths and texts))

math m
текст т
Is m read as m is mathematica thing and m read as t is a text thing? Or, rather, is math more western, than lyrics? Wasn't Orpheus thracian? раша производное от сраша? Саша!
Alexander is on A, and so many are of that initial, as if they compete for it:
Alexander, Andrew, Alexy (though isn't alexy just normalized by greeks minuscule form of Alex the Alexandre? Greeks had both names. Alexandre is as double as anna-maria: alex(ey) + andr(ey)
But why don't they say alexew? ew ~ ей
ю ~ ew ~ ей  (ю~её (иó))

Её = Eve (where ve is vav)

Language is toung tongue's
Math is mouth (the english word, seriously? (consider it poetry ffs wtf))
Notes are nose? of humming! We can sing a melody with out mouth. Vocalization is of mouth and it is not exactly music. Nose is Muse? because those notes are of music. music nosic? m~n? mu ~ nu (both are of -u, no other letter is, which once again speaks that they're forms of the same protoletter)

That math is of mouth tells that it predates textual form of information.
And that is supported by mathematical records predating textual records by tens of millenia.



с (со-, co- (with)) could be the same с (off) as in сдвинуть:

with and off are cognates? the first is vav, the second is θ

I didn't hope to find a ϝθ in greek corpus, because they needed vowels
ϝίς (later ἴς) – strength, force
ϝίς is definitely much closer to force than ἴς.
Who would have thought that for in force is some for.
ce the ς as in сила

ϝίς (later ἴς) – strength, forceRare, found in Homeric Greek and Aeolic dialects. The Ϝ is inferred from meter and comparative evidence (e.g., Sanskrit viś).
Example: Iliad 20.121.

ϝοἷ (later οἷ) – to him/her (dative pronoun)A pronoun in Homeric Greek, where Ϝ prevents elision in poetic meter.
Example: Iliad 1.201.

ϝοί (later οἱ) – to them (dative pronoun)Homeric pronoun, with Ϝ affecting meter.
Example: Iliad 1.67.


Those three are the shortest words with ϝ (according to Grok3)

No two-letter words with Ϝ are attested in Ancient Greek sources, including Homeric texts, inscriptions, or dialectal corpora. Most two-letter words in Greek are function words (e.g., καί, δέ, ἐν), and none include digamma, as it was not typically used in such short forms.

That ему, ей и им одно слово это крэйзи, но не так крэйзи как русское им
ϝίς ~ his? though it's him (and them (hem))

сила ~ сего (но ϝοἷ is сему (и сим))

но я подбираю по смыслу. ведь и её тоже (но и она сильна)

so, cherry-picking is a mistake I tend to do. I should apply some censor-sensor of ai to check it for it.

ϝ & Ѳ are both tabooed off the second raw, that Θ is antempt to revive ϝ and is labial.


But then the llm is too raw to be blindly trusted: I checked it, and wiktionary doesn't know the plural ϝοί, yet then greek is so ancient, and the article is not for the ϝ form:

οὗ

Ancient Greek
    IPA(key): /hûː/ → /u/ → /u/

Etymology 1
PIE word
*swé

From Proto-Hellenic *hwe = ϝέ (representing the accusative case), from Proto-Indo-European *swé (“reflexive pronoun”).

Alternative forms:
    οὑ (hou) — enclitic
    εἷο (heîo), ἕο (héo), εὗ (heû), ἕθεν (héthen) — Epic
    ἑο (heo), ἑθεν (hethen) — Epic, Doric, Ionic, enclitic
    εὗ (heû) — Homeric, Epic, Doric, Ionic, strong form, not clitic
    εὑ (heu) — Epic, Doric, Ionic, enclitic, synaeresis
    ἑοῦς (heoûs), ἑοῦ (heoû), ϝέος (wéos), ἕθεν (héthen) — Doric
    ϝέθεν (wéthen) — Aeolic

Pronoun

οὗ • (hoû)    "of him/her/it", "than him/her/it", etc.

Usage notes:    For dual and plural forms, see σφωέ (sphōé) and σφεῖς (spheîs).

Irregular declension of —; οὗ (Attic)
Irregular declension of —; εἷο (Epic)
Irregular declension of —; εὑ† (Ionic)
Irregular declension of —; ἑοῦς (Doric)
Irregular declension of —; ϝέθεν (Aeolic)

Grok opposes it with "it wasn't attested anywhere" and they do say "Dialects other than Attic are not well attested. Some forms may be based on conjecture. Use with caution.", yet it keeps insisting on that pronoun also being plural dativus. I don't know if the technology is still raw or is it too good already.
That's why it still takes a human specialist to tell. Or, better, a network of human specialists.

If that ϝέ existed, shouldn't it be included into the collection of pronoun's antonymy as we?

That εὑ is too much её not to be its cognate.
And ἕθεν is so much его [evo] with θ considered т yet read as ф so much reminding that. евоный

so is slavic hellenic with ν read as v and e read as s (thus russian is more of latin than of greek, etruscan)


When alphabets were born, the structure was not abc, but abcd. and ugaritic had it extended, which may tell that previous combination was 55 (ugaritic has 5 vowels, before phoenician. Is phoenician cut. Circumcised.


Chances are soviet schools have campaigns to break too prominent students. That's how kikes rule the higher race.
And if it's so, why am I allowed to speak? My voice is not too loud, my message is too obscure. I'm no threat, I will fuck myself when I have a chance. Freakey. Greatsy.



A great lecture from great McKenna, on

memory ~ mercury?  he tells that imagination is called mercury in alchemic texts, he teaches how to read them and what they arte, a great introduction.
arte~arts? e~s as in etudent~student.

экономить ~ сэкономить ?

э ~ с[s]RU

I cannot comment on the elements, but let me read them online, so I learn and you learn.


☿ is for mercury

🜍  (alchemy, archaic) sulphur/sulfur, brimstone
    (astronomy, obsolete) 19th-century typographic variant of ⟨⚴⟩, the symbol for asteroid (2) Pallas
    (astrology) cardinal zodiacal modality

🜔 alchemical symbol for salt
(alchemy, archaic) table salt (typically NaCl)
(astronomy, astrology, archaic) Earth
(astrology) fixed zodiacal modality
🜕 alchemical symbol for nitre
(alchemy, archaic) nitre, saltpetre (KNO3); (chemistry, obsolete) Daltonian symbol for nitrogen ("azote"); (meteorology) solar corona ...
Why would they confuse earth and salt?
The first form of earth (земли в метеорологии) they knew was salt. Naturally. Minerals came later.







(размышлял про ааа как анти-алкогольные-активисты, противопоставленными к аоо, где аоо было бы обозначением обозначало лбы алкоголя. алкоголь.
и начал искать слава со слогами на а.
дабрата (добрый, оттого и орфография не фонетическая)
красата (красотка (красавица (красотища (красотень)))) красный ~ классный
прастата (просто (про сто (сто грам не стоп-кран: дёрнешь, не остановишься (может они настояли на орфографии простота у слова прастата, чтоб алкоголь поближе к населению сделать))))

Что если красата это нормальная форма, а красотка уже девиаирует от той нормы по стилистическим причинам? праста


Hebrew speaks of 3 mothers, when there was only one vowel was the basis of the alphabet.
(and thinking of how diacritics coloured hebrew, I think that they all did it. They all were караван барабан каравай карава варана (ворона ~ варан? баран, таран, каран? сарай, тарас, карась, каркас, как раз, каракас, маракас (maraca), macaca, сабака, ватага, атака, Прикинь снять фильм про дикарей, где все слава на а (говорят, ударение было пор плавающим, значит слова и слава было бы одно и то же)


дабрата ~ до брата!

вражда ~ врага до[да] (вражина, ворожина, ворожила, вырезала? вражи ко)


north ~ на русь (народ (русь~род(россия~родина (cc=d?cГ? (d is between c and Г (g)))))))
мороз ~ на руси


квас каша картафан макаран(мука-варен? парен? жарен? (рен, очевидно огонь, flame? пламя? огонь?))
молоко коровой доено, доедено
(это одна из новых тем, а потому может быть что и одна из странных тем. посмотрим.)


жарен парен варен гарел гарит жарит (жарит как делает так что горело. го самостоятельное, же на двоих. жарит кто-то кого-то (или что-то (c is both к и ч (ᚴ и Ч)))

火 hwoCH
火 hi, kaJA
this glyph looks like a five pointed star:
and like a burning person, calling for everyones attention, and as a bon-fire (the hill of wood or other material and three tongues of flame above it to all sides. If you see the 火 the way I see it, that is even more bon-firey: the main flame and flames of fire floating around it as gases.

It's wild to see a man in 火, but 人 is man. and thus aren't those fires are floating around a man?
(man as in human (man as male is 男. And also 男人 (and 人 the human is ren, is it why I thought that 火 was ren in chinese or japanese, but 人 is. жарить, парить, варить, только человек умеет. рен потому что делает, от Японского суффикса ру и ри, Я это тайпоtypoe (оттого что я возле шифта))))


人 in japanese is hito, jin, nin, to (he, то? (а нин как в росиянин (вросиянин (врос))))
It is incredible, because 火 in japanese is hi.
hito ~ то, что в хи. что греется у костра. если костёр, то какой там рядом зверь? хи-то. хитро.
he & то перерослов в he & та?
she and та, are they

то, что и та и ту имеются в русском. как и то, и те. это удивительно. русский волшебный


та те ты то ту  есть ли ещё такие буквы?

ба бе бы (бабу бы тоже хорошее. спасибо, батя. извини, что не ценил, психанул)
         вы во
га Ге      go
да де иди? до do (this is the second best so far, or maybe ба! бе.. бы и бу! и бо как в боба.
иди и дуй. но д это  𓂧 , а не 𓃀

𓏙 [ḏj] is it a pyramid? is it for Jah?

𓍘 [tj] because it was used to make flour, and 𓏏 [t] is loaf.
𓏙 [ḏj] because it could be a tooth of a snake, 𓆓 [ḏ (in other sources, dj)]

But 𓏙 [ḏj] could be for Jah. But what do I know of him? Isn't he the sacrificial knife?
But the list teels that it's cone-shaped bread: Ideogram for ḏi, rḏj, give, given, to give; (an equivalent to arm offering conical "loaf"), Gardiner D37, D37
In iconography and reliefs, used for pharaonic statements: "Given, Life, Power...Forever"-(the vertical form of 'to give')
in the context of russian дай и роди it's hard for me not to suspect ancient egyptian to be a slavic language. Were russian being slaves in egypth? Did us also run from there? Only we ran to the forests, to the norths. Север ~ съ верху. Юг ~ down ~ south ~ союз? nations rarely fight upside down. Russians and Turkey did. Russian and Caucasus, And who know what China brings. I keep hope that their ideograms preserve the world view. But their maps teach them to see russia as their land. But I only heard it, why I never looked into that belief, it could be all propaganda. Some freaky maps, like maps of heavenly jerusalem of chazaria.


Жируха жрёт
Рыжуха ржёт  (red ~ рад (рад ~ glad (Р[r]RU ~ ᚴᛚ (R ~ K))))


hermit ~ hermetism


That McKenna's audiobook keeps on delivering: in the end of the third or fourth lecture, from 3:00:00 on, he speaks of cathars and that voynich manuscript was decyphered by a man named ..I had to check wiki for it, and though not mentioned in the article itself (it's 17.08.2025)
I should make a book of differences on different scales of large numbers, of different tons, of different pounds and miles and so on. On days and months having different positions across the globe.
I should make it not as a book, but as a panel. Panels are way more accessible. Students can read them while sitting on the dull lectures. We should ornate all auditoriums with food for thought. We should make museums like that: with benches.

And wiki delivers as well:
In September 2024, multispectral scans of ten selected pages were made public, revealing details unseen with visible light.




Формы гласных ещё чудовей перепутываются меж латинским и арабским:
ا is not I, but A (here and further I speak of their relative position in abjad)
ع is not E, but O
ه  is not O, but E
ی is neither U nor Y, it is I, which is И, and sorta y(Y) too. It looks more like U in hand-writing.


water ~ wetter
and if we go further, who knows, maybe t is for terra and w is in (v is in in russian, just as ב in hebrew, like what is going on here, those two are not even supposed to be related)



Ogham is climbed as a tree is climbed: by treading on the root of the tree first with one’s right hand before and one’s left hand last. After that it is across it and against it and through it and around it (one goes).
John Grant, The Auraicept: The Scholar’s Primer (Edinburgh: 1917).
And if it is true, it may sugest the sequence of BD FK (or does it go into the thirs aicme, being FG somehow?) speculative, but by these speculative steps we move further step by step.




quoque ~ тоже (то же (suggests that ж is palatalized т (and thus could be double ᛏ))

Isn't it funny, how they doubled the g, but suggest is still read as sudʒest


Different deities for different peoiple is a great thing. Mobnotheism broke the Empire, because it came directly in the contradiction of terms. It is as if it was invented to break empires of roman kind. Directly to burn the Roman Empire byt subvertion, undermining their basal principle.



Нувориши предпочиитают читать себя new rich, but в русском в первую очередь слышится наворовали, даже при том что есть прямой омоним наваришь. (как говори́шь-гово́ришь, так и навари́ш ~ нава́ришь (многие произносят нуво́риш, поскольку во французском это два слова, и в двуслоговом падает именно на это, то и ударять его имеет смысл, чтоб это законсервировать. риш отдельное слово, и конечно может ударение падать и на него. Так вот как двойное ударение имеет право на жизнь, как оно естественно. Но не всюду оно может плавать: ну́вориш не говорит никто
 (от трудов праведных не (что-то там) палат каменных (русская пословица (какой-то русский поэт древности ушёл в народ, появившись позднише раннише печатна станка))))


The position of Ѱ in russian sequence and Ψ in greek sequence may tell that those are two stages of pulling it down (satan's pitch-fork! with horns! some christians didn't like it because of that)
ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩαβγδεζηθικλμνξοπρσ/ςτυφχψωϚϛͰͱⱵⱶᾺὰΆάᾹᾱᾸᾰĒɛ̄ΈέῈὲϜΉήῊὴῙῑῘῐῚὶῒΊίΐϘϙϚϛϜϝϞϟϠϡͰͱͲͳʹ͵Ͷͷͺͻͼͽ;Ϳ΄΅Ϗϐϑϒϓϔϕϖϗgreek
АБВГДЄЖЅЗИІКЛМНОПРСТѸФХѠЦЏЧШЩЪꙐЬѢꙖѤЮѪѬѦѨѮѰѲѴҀабвгдєжѕзиіклмнопрстѹфхѡцџчшщъꙑьѣꙗѥюѫѭѧѩѯѱѳѵҁѶѷѺѻѼѽѾѿꙊꙋꙀꙂꙄꙆꙈꙌѾꙎꙐꙒꙔꙖꙘꙚꙜꙞrussian
it didn't deserve the position of omega, but it was in the end, as letov



Богиня производное от бог, но феос производное от фея (сам язык свидетель) и проще представить, что родит (мир) богиня, Θея, а не вот это ваше всё)


дом~дым ~ порог~парок(и где-то там порок, быть может позабытою когнатой, метафорой того, что за каждым порогом комната, и иногда та комната в которой души гибнут. но это, само собой, фантазируемая спекулятивная гиотетичная предпологаемая реставрация происхождения сией омонимии)


Японское ики в значении ид(ущ)и(й) тем прикольней, что к~с~g~g~д
(и я понимаю, что "неродственные" (хаха) но таковы же и русский с ивритом и удачи объяснять как так получилось что русское в это еврейское ב)

На латинском ire.

идите сюда veni huc (come here)
идите туда eo ire (there go)

my email is d@aeiou.nu and that d is there of dimitrij and how they allowed this name in christian culture is incredible, because son of the mother in christianity is jesus and no one else. And what is even more fascinating is that people kept the understanding of it being de Minerva, deMetra

I'm working on having Glukhoff

The lines of text look like four knives (I saw it in Глухов's name and then saw that they're all like that)
Г is Гарда. (the stav is probably the handle. as it is a stick)


Glue and Gluk
Luke and Gluk
What am I doing? Writing poems for what end? Glück!

Glück looks like a merging of Good Luck. [u] sound intensified of doubvlingn.


huisNL [haus] hausDE 
How does ui read as au? u as in bus, i as и the и.

DE is GE and g is both d and g.

дочь ~ гочь? girl (ч~rl? Ч h rl?)

король ~ coach?
тролль ~ точ? нож точит? добро тощит?

тащить как тощить означает воровать, утончать мушок мешок.
тащит тать.

рать ращит?
зять защит?! о, это хорошо. зять защитник (рать ращитник? рать решит!)
блять блещит! блистательные дамы берут деньги за секс? на кривой козе не подъедешь.
дать (это глагол, чувак, нужны существительные)
мать мащит? мешит? может? might? моет~мочит? мать~мыть? дети даже в бани с матерями ходят (мужики грубоваты для тонкого обращения с тоддлерами)

платье плещет? плескается вокруг. плещется.
пальто полы это
куртка коротка!
jacket jacked?
coat cold? cover? co+at(at как в адеть, значит приставка не о, а ат: атдеть, отделать значит сделать со всех сторон? обделать точно это значит. но от как от ворот поворот, от~из. of. not about or around. not, neh? too early to tell, I need to know more about the shorties first. Let's keep exploring the shortest words. Thinking that they're the fundamental elements of the speech.

But back on track, очь ~ irl (ёл)
ч ~ л
чайник ~ лейник ?
чашка ~ ложка? плошка? плей ~ плесни? пей?
чайка ~ летайка
чушь ~ ложь!
чумазый ~ лемазый? намазан? мазать корень же. а чу что такое? too? чу~фу? some placeholder proto-prefix? чухан ~ ло хан (лохан как лох! я писал по еврейски это ло)


If this position is correct, then did they taboo K and place N next to M to get IMNL? or wans it IMKNL for iG is iŋ the N, while iB is iW the ił the il?
And did knife of k came to take the place and send both M and N to the end of the line?
MN for man? iManuil is "not Man (is) him"


тримати ~ тривати (keep ~ keep on)

how so? ~ как так? ~ что так? ~ почему так? (но не где так или когда так)


Today it came to me (in bath where I dig extremely deep, now in the blue rough cardboard folder)
that фея is a three-literal word for a good and female deity. while бес is male and mean. бог and бес are probably doublets, cognates.


Другие говорят, что это сделал Меркурий, смотря на полет журавлей, которые чертят разные буквы.
Why didn't I think to observe the crane crowds (what if they scream depending on the shape they keep? I thought Ʌ was the only shape they had. But even if it was so, they I would have the four:
Ʌ>V<
Ʌ and youV may be opposite as Ʌrctos the север the north, and Vг the юг the south.
Ʌ and V are opposite and аз and U.

> the b     and      < the d

wait, no, < is c.. but c ~ d (c is staveless d (ᚲ is staveless ᚦ))

ɅƆVЄ allows to read all four as vowels, and the order is weird: aoue... it takes i at the end to make it oghamic.

But before that idea I was thinking of ɔ~b and thus ʌɔvc would follow russian абв order (as in glagolitic (it seems they only knew v (the way greeks do today (and probably always did, fuck reconstructionism, that shit's neither verifiable nor falsifiable, thus unscientific, those puffers)
бв and vw (and pf being in the same letter (and maybe that allows both Θ and Ϝ in the second line of the greeks. And it resolves the idea of the closed and open syllables, be and eb were b and v (or were those ba and ab? ))
A Ba aB aD Da        А Б В Г Д
E Be eB eD De        Е Ф Ѳ Ж З
I Bi iB iD Di            И N M R L   (first I thought Й the Йуд to be the labial for jU, but въ~in(v~ν)
O Bo oB oD Do       O П ? К Т
U Bu uB uD Du       У Ф Ѱ Х С   (Du ~ Sie [zi])        (уД ~ Хуй (Х как 𐤕))

I'm a couple labials short, but there's W and actually Ю (Y? for it is so much У)


E could be formed by two C's and I could be a one-wing V. VVedge of the Crane. Wedge

quoin [ко́ин] клин в значении угловой камень кладки, внешний угол знания здания.

A Ba  aB aD Da       А Б  В Г Д
E Be  eB eD De       Е Ф  Ѳ Ж З
I  Bi   iB  iD Di        И W M R L
O Bo oB oD Do       O П  ?  К Т
U Bu uB uD Du       У Ф Ѱ Х С    I used Ф twice and didn't even notice, oh me

OPQR.. I suspect R to previously be labial (the farting sound) later civilized, but what about Q? it is literally CV.. cU.. like Y is jU
both Q and q look like Ю with the ball and the stick, it is like держава и скипетр, like queen or something.

A Ba  aB aD Da       А Б  В Г Д
E Be  eB eD De       Е Ф  Ѳ Ж З
I  Bi   iB  iD Di        И W M R L
O Bo oB oD Do       O П  ?  К Т
U Bu uB uD Du       У Y Ѱ Х С  this way I approached the 666ness of UVW and ЪЫЬ

Naturally it is only an attempt at reconstruction, but I just said fcuk reconstructions. Other's reconstructions as I am making the my own. I stick to facts to see what they may tell.

Let's declare R a labial (since it looks like Р is Russian)

A Ba  aB aD Da       А Б  В Г Д
E Be  eB eD De       Е Ф  Ѳ Ж З
I  Bi   iB  iD Di        И W M N L
O Bo oB oD Do       O П R  К Т   and it is surprisingly good
U Bu uB uD Du       У Y Ѱ Х С   (it's not surprising me that it's at the right spot, because I saw it before)

W is amongst sonors, but it is not what I ever saw. could Й be W? both are short semivowels, and russians think that и is i.  also both й and w are sonors (not all sonors are semivowels, and is J й or дж энд зас нот сонор?)

Т could be the last letter. or there could be only three and not five per line (p and f are the same letter in hebrew. maybe that is just how g and д were, thus abc, containing in it a,e, b, v, g, d, s, maybe also z,
ab was off?  F?  
be was vie? who knows, but I shall keep on working on this theory.

Those were not just some syllables, they were all the possible syllables (combining the only two consonants with the five vowels and maybe both sides. Let's try both 15 and 25 sets (younger futhark and latin alphabet sets? Bureus had 15 runes, and some )


Using google to find an alphabet of 25 letters, I was told of Ogham and Slovene. Maybe Grok knows more:
Hi there! Which alphabet have exactly 25 letters? Just list them, no need for one of the essays of yours.
None. No widely recognized natural language alphabet has exactly 25 letters.
And what about slovene?
The Slovene alphabet has 25 letters: a, b, c, č, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, r, s, š, t, u, v, z, ž.
Good. Thank you.
You're welcome!

Encyclopedic listings (such as in the 2001 Slovenski pravopis and the 2006 Leksikon SOVA) use this alphabet:
    a, b, c, č, ć, d, đ, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, š, t, u, v, w, x, y, z, ž.

Yet Grok explains it well:
The sequence you provided from the 2001 Slovenski pravopis and 2006 Leksikon SOVA lists 31 letters:
a, b, c, č, ć, d, đ, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, š, t, u, v, w, x, y, z, ž.
This differs from the standard modern Slovene alphabet, which has exactly 25 letters:
a, b, c, č, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, r, s, š, t, u, v, z, ž.
Key Differences and Relations: Additional Letters in the 31-Letter Sequence: The sequence includes ć, đ, q, w, x, y, which are not part of the standard 25-letter Slovene alphabet.
These additional letters (ć, đ, q, w, x, y) are typically used in Slovene for writing foreign names, loanwords, or in specific contexts like encyclopedic listings that account for broader orthographic needs (e.g., proper nouns, technical terms, or historical usage).

Standard Slovene Alphabet (25 Letters): The standard Slovene alphabet excludes ć, đ, q, w, x, y because they are not used in native Slovene words. The letters č, š, ž cover the phonetic needs for native Slovene sounds, and the standard alphabet is streamlined for everyday use in the language.

so,

a b c č d
e f g h
i j k l m n
o p r s š t
u v z ž

and it gave me an interesting ordering of ogham:

a b c d e f g h i k l m n ng o p r s t u w y z ch th

a b c d
e f g h
i k l m n ng
o p r s t
u w y z ch th

Thinking of how my book is called ა ბ გ დ, and that if I add column of such in other alphabets, a b c would be sufficient, thus it should become ა ბ გ and it shows me how g is lower than B, and that a b d are аз, бог, дьявол (я ставлю бога пред собой, и он защищает меня от дьявола)

abc has that аз and бог and сатана in it, maybe telling that alphabets appeared around here.



That aoue order of ɅƆVЄ aligns the lines in voiced plosives, voiceless plosives, voiceless fricatives, voiced fricatives, leaving the sonors out of it.


It seems Q _is_ a form of O:                   
aoue is aqua (water) in Lorraine     (and a ~ e (a is read as e in pan and can in the usa (it is literally ei)))
Lorrain, also known as Lorrain roman, is a langue d'oïl spoken by a minority of people in the region of Lorraine in northeastern France, as well as in some parts of Alsace and Gaume in Belgium. It is often referred to as a patois.


langue d'oïl    /lɒ̃(ɡ) ˈdɔɪl,    French lɑ̃ɡ dɔjl/
 
    the form of medieval French spoken north of the Loire, generally characterized by the use of oïl to mean ‘yes’, and forming the basis of modern French.
 
The langues d'oïl[note 1] are a dialect continuum that includes standard French and its closest relatives historically spoken in the northern half of France, southern Belgium, and the Channel Islands. They belong to the larger category of Gallo-Romance languages, which also include the historical languages of east-central France and western Switzerland, southern France, portions of northern Italy, the Val d'Aran in Spain, and under certain acceptations those of Catalonia.

langue ~ лгать? как в слове излагать. Log maybe of that, and maybe they were covered with runes, and were cut down because of that! лаять, и, скорей всего, ещё куча скрытых когнат.
Мы говорим они лают, у нас разведчики у них шпионы, у нас бог у них гад, старый фокус.



Лежать легко ~ to lay, to lie is light (light an obsolete (in that sense) form of easy?)
lie and how those two words are similar in russian too, tells that лгать легко (правду сказать сложнее)


Because latin G is mirrored as Z in greek, God and Zeus coudl be cognates. d~c~s (D could be borrowed from ᚦ, and abc was expanded with it. And maybe бв is a reflection of it. Or, rather бв is authentic, preserved only in russian, but vw is in latin, but it is recent, that's why I suspect ⰀⰁ to be a later addition to what started as ⰂⰃⰄ UGD is the eastern order. U as the final vowel, or is it V G D, the three types of consonants, only modified when in other raws the way abugidas are modified)

ⰀⰁⰂⰃⰄⰅⰆⰇⰈⰉⰊⰋⰌⰍⰎⰏⰐⰑⰒⰓⰔⰕⰖⰗⰘⰙⰚⰛⰜⰝⰞⰟⰠⰡⰢⰣⰤⰥⰦⰧⰨⰩⰪⰫⰬⰭⰮⰰⰱⰲⰳⰴⰵⰶⰷⰸⰹⰺⰻⰼⰽⰾⰿⱀⱁⱂⱃⱄⱅⱆⱇⱈⱉⱊⱋⱌⱍⱎⱏⱐⱑⱒⱓⱔⱕⱖⱗⱘⱙⱚⱛⱜⱝⱞglagolitic

ⰂⰃⰄ ~ ⰆⰇⰈ?
The similarity of Ⰳ and Ⰷ made me write it. But others are not so good. phonetically they're more of Ⰲ~Ⰸ and Ⰴ~Ⰶ but also not modified the same way, which is not how abugidas do it.

Ⱁ[o] and Ⱆ[u] is very english.

and because o is already double, it's hard for me not to recall ⴰ, which is a in tifinagh. Their Ⱁ is ⵓ

I was looking for something ⴰlike and the best I found is Ⱛ the izhitsa, read as y or u.

ⴰⴱⴲⴳⴴⴵⴶⴷⴸⴹⴺⴻⴼⴽⴾⴿⵀⵁⵂⵃⵄⵅⵆⵇⵈⵉⵊⵋⵌⵍⵎⵏⵐⵑⵒⵓⵔⵕⵖⵗⵘⵙⵚⵛⵜⵝⵞⵟⵠⵡⵢⵣⵤⵥⵦⵧ⵰⵿ⵯtifingah

Ⰻ for и
Ⱄ for s   

The inclusion in Glagolitic of the letters Ⰺ, Ⰹ and Ⰻ with the same phonetic value was probably intended to imitate Byzantine Greek orthography where both η (eta) and ι (iota) were pronounced as /i/; it is possible that in the oldest texts Ⰻ rendered the i that alternated with tense ь.

Ⰻ for и
Ⱄ for s    what are these? keyholes? Like runes, they must be a pair of antonyms.

истина? sila? s for слабость was my first association, and if it's a stone on the top of the mountain, it's a weak position, it's going to fall down. Or it could be head of a stick, the head's position is very weak. while sharp upon a fruit is success. Let's keep on looking, suspecting to find some indo-european roots in glagolitic imagery.

Ⰻ ида́
Ⱄ s-te [ʃ]  shy is shied (shitted (обосравшийся старается на глаза не показываться))

shield lets shit? that a warrior hid himself by it.

another pair:
Ⰲ[v]
Ⰴ[d]

Ⰲ looks like upside down Ⱅ[t] in square glagolitic. Somehow this operating system (SeaMonkey under Windows and SeaMonkey under Linux use different fonts for glagolitic and phoenician, and probably most of them) and that is another enigma, yet here an additional phonetic freedom.

Ⰲ[v] видеть
Ⰴ[d] делать    that's a nice pair of passive and active, and exactly the way I would expect them to be.

Ⰲ[v] владеть
Ⰴ[d] давать

Ⰲ[v] велеть
Ⰴ[d] делать   вот это хорошая парочка. но велеть пассивно разве? не активно, не действуешь сам.


плыву ~ по liquid vue
l is for лить, liquid, lake, loch, lock как замок и замок в центре озера?
loch ~ lock, because замкнутый водоём (не открытый, land-locked)
what is ch~ck? 𓎡?

but then слыву blocks my path, reminding that brute force doesn't work here.

плыву
слыву    ~    слышу     (that w~ш thing?) тогда...
плыву    ~    плещусь
    рву     ~    режу?
зову       ~   
реву       ~     рыдаю, реку, речку, речка режет разрывает. речь режет правду-матку?



The next picture, I have shown it in vol.37, where I only slightly spoke about those letters probably being the musical notation. And now I know it for sure. Boetius is the guy told (to me by Grok in vol.41) to be the first to use latin alphabet for musical notation. And he is also told (in wiki, if you click the image, you can read it yourself) to be the guy responsible for translation of greek classics into latin. Which is crazy considering that he lived rather late. So, greeks used their letters for musical notations at least a millenium before that.

This image shows him using pentatonic scale, and it shows that the five notes were abcde, which may tell that c is for centre, a is fro ante, e is for exte (as in anterior and exterior (not posterior, not interior?) am I not stretching it to my ends? well, it's a hypothesis. c is too cool not to continue upon it)
and here's the guy again, in the image I've shown in vol.15:


Typus Arithmeticae written above the lady in the centre is what the guys (living in different times) represent. I wonder why the numbers on her dress go right to left, and why they break the order.




В сорок с гаком лет научился не шлёпать себя самого по уху, а хлопать комара двумя руками возле него.



Когда я видел как борятся за меня ангел и дьявол, то выбрал дьявола, наверное теперь всё же у него в гостях, бунтую дабы быть в нейтралитете или по природе буиной своей?

странно, и почти никогда не опечатка вместо й (там я сам из--за ритма, как и здесь, изменил)

мысль запинается за следующие, потому что мысль гораздо быстрей письма. бысль что (чуть) только что не записал (что чуть-то. недавно то. чуть~чуя слышал то? но чуть не только с речью связано. тю-тю ~ чуть-чуть (поддмести-то если, найдётся мука даже если нет))

Колобок сказка про голод!
По чуланам помела, по чему-то там поскребла. И испекла колобок, пустой пирожок, потому что друхи ингредиентов не было. облатку. священный хлеб христиан (у православных её грызть нужно, дрожжи хлебные и винные дрожжи христиане в людей раздают. Наверное, дрожжи имеют защитную функцию, раз культ так шустро распространился. Нахаляву кормят-поят телом Христа (наверное, чтоб людоеды тоже обращались. Может христианство нужно чтоб отвадить негров от каннибализма?)



в мою юность салки назывались догонялками, интересно как сейчас называют.
салки что за мерзское слово. словно они писяли друг на друга. быть может сифа не самая мерзкая из игр советских детей.
салки (догоняющий — «во́да»; дотрагиваться — «са́лить», ср. крапива обжигает = са́лит; ср. англ. sully, soil — пачкать)
читая первую часть объяснения я лишь думал "а если бы этимология была от разговорного сака, стали бы они его приводить? разумеется нет, decency они блюдут" и английский выдал, что по крайней мере означает сальными руками касаться. Sully, soil, пачкать.. soil в которую ссут!

water and soda
water and сота


сота соткана?
сота ~ совместное твёрдое ~ совместные стенки?


а сифа тоже от той ссу? фа могла означать трапку тряпку от слов фэшн и фасон.

фа как в фант


бантики ~ фантики? бант значит завязанный, байнд завязывать, связывать. ф как долгое б, если б для бечёвка, верёвка, то ф fabric. faбрюк?

если сама буква ф означает две петли рядом, что символизирует вязку, то и В is for вязать.

b как в слове брать означает захват ладонью? д как в слове длань is 𓂧


𓈙𓈛𓈜𓈚 are all š and depict lake and pool (but not 𓈘 (it's mr and stands for canal, not pool))
Because 𓈜 has those water-like shapes within, basically it is the original shape, and 𓈙 is just a simplification for it (and 𓈛 is showing the depth, and 𓈚 maybe shows the shallow place in the middle built to walk it through.


levy (облагать (налогом и т.п.))
levee (дамба, насыпь, намывной вал реки пристань, набережная приём у главы государства, воздвигать дамбы)
Видимо, начиналось как сбор на возведение дамбы, а окончилось как регулярные поборы без особой на то причины.

š the 𓈜 could be cognate of šuǐ the 水 (which also could be a cognate of russian ssu (the way мочить is of моча (и оно же море, но сколько же трансмутации прошло от ч до r

пёс пищит писк (или от того что писает, как и сука оттого что ссыт)

лайка лает (диалектные названия собак являбисются названиями пород (по роду) подобно тому как дог название датских догов, и всё ещё сложней: это в русском эта порога называется дог, в английском же ближайшим термином называется great dane (великолепный датский, но так же и великий датчанин (по роду) не только по языку, но прямо по имени племени. Может быть этнонимы лишь в именах других видов останутся))

гав в каком слове именем собаки является?

woof ~ wolf

 In Mandarin, barking is "汪汪" (wāng-wāng), but "dog" is "狗" (gǒu).

Grok tells it's not likely that woof~wolf were cognates, and even less likely that гав and gǒu were, because for wolf~woof they need ancestor in indo-european (totally made up language) and that there had to be a historic contact between chinese and proto-slavs (merchants were such contact, they always were, long before historic records)


птаха & птица ~ петь
пт (пей (рот в иврите сегодня) + т (глагольный суффикс, делать, hence петь (но и пить)))

петь и пить: оба глагола означают действие ртом, петь наружу, пить внутрь. но блёв пением не зовут, что делает эту теорию шаткой.

pit ~ рот? по смыслу и по графике подходит, пит как пьёт? дорога пьёт ртом выбоины? слишком поэтично, но для древних наверное было нормальным.

Была поэзия необходима из-за омонимии? чтоб ритмы и рифмы подсказывали? гласные повторялись? я думал у древних лишь ритм блюли. Может количество и долгота гласных определяли какое из значений слова было употреблено.

ударение подобно диакртике, ею и является


птаха ~ потеха

птица ~ потеться?
птц.. но если глсн лшн, то

Without vowels english has 21 letters.

B C D
F G H
J K L M N
P Q R S T
V W X Y Z

B C D
F G H
M K L
P Q T
V X Z
W N J
Y R S

W and Y the wu and yu make it nice, and truly the addition to pentatonic.

7 liberal arts could be 9 muses with outlawed two. Erato, naturally. Who else?
Let's compare it. Let's ask Grok first? No, Let's do it ourselves, so we don't fall for Grok's mistakes if we didn't make them.


Элементы: LMN: Литература Музыка Наука
(я перестал стесняться русской мовы, может она трусская, мы трусы, зайчики-русачки, говорил уже об этом (thrassian, as Orpheus himself))


хорошо, быть может, закрученное хахаха
тогда и круто это краткая форма слова хорошо и гуд когнатой этого хараша является: д is between r and ʃ




Основоположность, базовость последовательности ABC, понимаемой как голос губы язык,
проявляется и в каждой из групп, на который музы были разделены по совершенно иным соображениям:

То, что я выдал про муз в третьем томе, основанием имело картинку в интернете. С трудом доходит, что академический подход к источникам мает сенс.


звезда ~ светит ~ светла ~ света
пезда ~ пизди́т? ~ бе́дит ~ пиздец ~ пи́здит (проебать ~ по ппизде? в пизду?)
пизда ~ бздит (и в том смысле что пукает тоже)
бездна ~ беда ~ бдит?
жи́да ~ ждёт


Isn't it strange that I still don't know which muse is who? And their names are a great way to learn greek.
Let's just remember them by the translation of their names.


No matter how much conflicting that image from the internet about Muses was, it delivers, and that is how I'm going to remember them. Especially since when I started to align them to abc sequence, the first muse is occasionally ...and it's my conformation bias. They say about Euterpe "presiding over music, not presiding over muses. The oldest of the sisters is told (by the Google's Gemini (they're so much G)) to be The oldest was Calliope, mother of the legendary musician Orpheus. Euterpe was the muse of music. Urania guided the scientists. Terpsichore taught dance.

Euterpe (/juːˈtɜːrpiː/; Greek: Εὐτέρπη, lit. 'rejoicing well' or 'delight' [eu̯térpɛː], from Ancient Greek: εὖ, romanized: eû, lit. 'well' + Greek: τέρπειν, romanized: térpein, lit. 'to please') was one of the Muses in Greek mythology, presiding over music. In late Classical times, she was named muse of lyric poetry.[1] She has been called "Giver of delight" by ancient poets.

In Greek mythology, Terpsichore (/tərpˈsɪkəriː/; Ancient Greek: Τερψιχόρη, "delight in dancing") is one of the nine Muses and goddess of dance and chorus. She lends her name to the word "terpsichorean", which means "of or relating to dance".

In Greek mythology, Clio (traditionally /ˈklaɪoʊ/,[2] but now more frequently /ˈkliːoʊ/; Greek: Κλειώ), also spelled Kleio, Сleio, or Cleo,[3] is the muse of history,[4] or in a few mythological accounts, the muse of lyre-playing.[5]
Clio's name is derived from the Greek root κλέω/κλείω (meaning "to recount", "to make famous" or "to celebrate").[6][7][8] The name's traditional Latinisation is Clio,[9] but some modern systems such as the American Library Association-Library of Congress system use K to represent the original Greek kappa, and ei to represent the diphthong ει (epsilon iota), thus Kleio.


Urania (/jʊəˈreɪniə/ yoor-AY-nee-ə; Ancient Greek: Οὐρανία, romanized: Ouranía; meaning "heavenly" or "of heaven") was, in Greek mythology, the muse of astronomy and astrology. Urania is the goddess of astronomy and stars, her attributes being the globe and compass.
The muse Urania is sometimes confused with Aphrodite Urania ("heavenly Aphrodite") because of their similar name.

Polyhymnia (/pɒliˈhɪmniə/; Greek: Πολυύμνια, lit. 'the one of many hymns'), alternatively Polymnia (Πολύμνια), is, in Greek mythology, the Muse of sacred poetry, sacred hymn, dance and eloquence, as well as agriculture and pantomime.
Polyhymnia on an antique fresco from Pompeii
Polyhymnia's name comes from the Greek words "poly", meaning "many", and "hymnos", which means "praise".[1]

In Greek mythology, Thalia (/θəˈlaɪə/[1][2] or /ˈθeɪliə/;[3] Ancient Greek: Θάλεια; "the joyous, the flourishing", from Ancient Greek: θάλλειν, thállein; "to flourish, to be verdant"), also spelled Thaleia, was one of the Muses, the goddess who presided over comedy and idyllic poetry. In this context her name means "flourishing", because the praises in her songs flourish through time.


In Greek mythology, Erato (/ˈɛrətoʊ/; Ancient Greek: Ἐρατώ) is one of the Greek Muses, the inspirational goddesses of literature, science, and the arts. The name would mean "desired" or "lovely", if derived from the same root as Eros, as Apollonius of Rhodes playfully suggested in the invocation to Erato that begins Book III of his Argonautica.[

Melpomene (/mɛlˈpɒmɪniː/; Ancient Greek: Μελπομένη, romanized: Melpoménē, lit.  'to sing' or 'the one that is melodious') is the Muse of tragedy in Greek mythology. She is described as the daughter of Zeus and Mnemosyne (and therefore of power and memory) along with the other Muses, and she is often portrayed with a tragic theatrical mask.
Melpomene's name (implying the meaning "Songstress"[1]) is derived by etymologists from the Ancient Greek verb μέλπω (melpô) or from its inflexion μέλπομαι (melpomai) meaning "to celebrate with dance and song".[2] The Oxford English Dictionary cites μέλπειν (melpein – to sing).

In Greek mythology, Calliope (/kəˈlaɪ.əpi/ kə-LY-ə-pee; Ancient Greek: Καλλιόπη, romanized: Kalliópē, lit.  'beautiful-voiced') is the Muse who presides over eloquence and epic poetry, so called from the ecstatic harmony of her voice. Hesiod and Ovid called her the "Chief of all Muses". (well, since they say she was the oldest, maybe. Epic Poetry. And isn't it lovely that in my separation she comes the last. Is Ourania the youngest? And what were the chances!: The youngest of the Greek Muses, and therefore the youngest of the nine daughters of Mnemosyne and Zeus, is generally considered to be Urania. She is the Muse of astronomy, with symbols including a globe and compass, and sometimes a crown of stars.)
So is it just a coincidence, or do muses give their new testament over me and those who made that image in the internet in the first place? May the muse of comedy be the architect? It would promise the happy ending.
Gemini arranged them like this:
Birth Order from Oldest to Youngest
    Calliope: Muse of epic poetry.
    Clio: Muse of history.
    Erato: Muse of love and romantic poetry.
    Euterpe: Muse of music and lyric poetry.
    Melpomene: Muse of tragedy.
    Polyhymnia: Muse of hymns and sacred poetry.
    Terpsichore: Muse of dance and choral song.
    Thalia: Muse of comedy and idyllic poetry.
    Urania: Muse of astronomy.
Five out of nine directly represent some specific form of poetry. And since Tragedies were also in poem, it makes them six. And songs are poems. Seven of Nine. And it leaves only History and Astronomy behind, and something tells me that they were poetic as well. What tells me that is what I was taught: that poetry predates prose. Maybe as literature it was, but naturally first records were prosaic. So it's such a speculative subject, and only now I figure out that I'm way out of my depth in the realm of classicists where I'm not trained and in which I am quite an ignoramus.
Isn't it wonderful that that order is alphabetic!

Yet Grok slightly disagrees:  I’d stick closer to Hesiod’s listing (Calliope, Clio, Euterpe, Thalia, Melpomene, Terpsichore, Erato, Polyhymnia, Urania), noting that it reflects prominence or narrative order, not age. Gemini’s list is a reasonable attempt but introduces questionable choices (e.g., Erato’s high placement, Thalia’s low rank) that don’t fully hold up to scrutiny.

And considering that Thalia actually starts with Θ  , Grok's arrangement is even more accurate (but least accurate with Erato and Polyhymnia, placing them between T and U, where nobody should be.

Maybe Hesiod just aranged them alphabetically (thus telling that the order existe in hois times) yet I have to read him myself. I will when llm ..largelanguageModel. lll. ווו.
And Gemini gave them from latin translation (I didn't check it yet, I rely so much on the technology, it's even irrational, considering that it is still bugging)


хирург от херорез? было обрезание самой простой хирургической операцией? Самой древней? Для того, чтоб у врача практика была. Тонкая операция, как на котёнке, а если ещё и зашивает, то и сосуды сможет зашивать.


Jewish way to open books from left to right is also Japanese, and those know jews as kappas

kappa is probably bastardized quipa

and maybe quipa is not just an homonym of quipu

Both are woven, and with the black circle in the centre of both they look even more alike.
That takes us to the steganography of knitting. In the way that pattern could be read like these:
But hey, is futhark reversed abc? abc sequence ending with labial, since futhark begins with ᚠ. But what if that ᚠ is actually ᚫ, as kylvern stone sorta has it? as if the line has the eastern order.


I placed the glass jar with some weed in it upon a suspended ривлёную рифлёную сетку,

рифлёный ~ искривлённый (that typo told me that, the greyeing of typo tradition maybe allowed subconscious mind to have its say. That's a hypothesis, but if the percentage of such typo wisdom increases, I can tell yay)

and when I unlocked the spring of it and opened it, the mash (рифлёная сетка) said something with delay of the repetitious echo, being small of each surface, but being in lock, it resonated. I suspended it by composing three rhombi and putting it agains a wall next to an open storage room (maybe it was a resonator too) so it was a high table I could smoke with (не с которым, но с которого)
And I almost left it like this without the linguistic side of the story (so if you find such pieces elsewhere, probably they're of the same nature. And here it is:
When I opened the jar, it sang something similar to откройте, and soon I heard in it ouvrez(ouvrir) and when I closed, I more speculated than really heard ferme(fermer) where labiality was of that mild echo, which was very wow, The recording is at audio recordings of my main phone of 2025.





      рифлёный
искривлённый
искра
      ра

искатель
      атель? отель Искатель (красиво, но нет (надо зарегистрировать и продать какому-нибудь новосибирскому предпринимателю))


ᚱᛋ

Let's continue with the futhark as inverse alphabet
ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚲᚷᚹ᛬ ᚺᚾᛁᛃᛇᛈᛉᛊ᛬ ᛏᛒᛖᛗᛚᛜᛞᛟ: elder fuþark (1(?)c.~9c.) gothic runes are the same plus quairtra(𐍁)
ᛏᛒᛖ being reversed is EBT, which is very nice, but not exactly ABC, since ᛗᛚᛜᛞᛟ is another line after (or before) it. mlŋdo, which I suspected to be imlnξο in ᛖᛗᛚᛜᛞᛟ
I saw it as the aet of sonors right after the fundamental TB are at what stands before it.

So, what is it? Just another crazy idea about futhark, net to avthopk, this one is futorqhp hnijipsz tbemlŋdo

o of futorqhp coujld be σ the ς

and because the similarity is not exact, let's figure out which letters are later added, if the basis of it was the alphabetic sequences.

futorqhp hnijipsz tbemlŋdo
ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚲᚷᚹ᛬ ᚺᚾᛁᛃᛇᛈᛉᛊ᛬ ᛏᛒᛖᛗᛚᛜᛞᛟ or, read in reverse, onlm ebtsz ijpqrþ uf  (ŋ~n, c~~q, w~p, þ~s/t, )

ŋ~n, thus no need in ᚾ,
ᛇ~ᛁ, but then ᛇ is more wider: [iː], [x], [ç], so maybe it has to go and give ᛁ the chance, but maybe they're the same, as I can be Η, and J can be H, and thus maybe ᛇ is even closer to ᛃ. Basically, I should have decyphered ᚺᚾᛁᛃᛇ as one claster. And what if ᚨᚱᚲᚷᚹ᛬ ᚺᚾᛁ is it? c~h, w~h in japanese, R~W~П, but come on, even ᚨ because it was nearby. No, that's not science, not even poetry, it's what is it? a delirium maybe


youthful ~ useful


gesture languages is are more intuitive:
I showed my ma that the kettle has boiled by showing чашечка чаю gesture (as if I sip of a cup'o'tea) followed by gesture depicting steam with my hand, relaxed with fingers upwards making waving moves upwards (the hand was making the waves (if I waved with fingers, it would be smoke)) I was understood. Also because of the context, of course. So is language only understood in context a true language? Generally, there's no border between writing systems and proto-writing systems. Is there? There probably are some characteristics by which different researchers dared to put the line into the sand of different examples of writing. How many of them there are? More than there are humans. Much more (что можно перевести как неисчислимо больше)

smoke ~ shake fingers
steam ~ shake hand (hand ~ team? as hand is a team of fingers)

finger ~ moke? like маленький мук ~ м-к с п-к? (не моук с поук, не мук с пук, но мальчик с пальчик)

moke is mesh (a cell of a net and such)
speaking of C being both K and S and probably Š as well, since shin is both s and š)


Erato Melpomena Calliopa, called I the muses whom I suspect to be all about literature, the realm to which this work is the closest of my other things: biotech immortality is the closest to science. And I also strive towards musical achievements. Yet music is for the autumn, my musicians can do it in the autumn. I think the time around 22 September may be magical. 21 Septermer Septeember is New Moon.

So, why do I speak of other muses? Maybe tomorrow I sing names of musical muses. I sang names of the three scientific (in my non-traditional way, the one I adopted in vol. III, I wanted to reject it but Glukhoff said why, so I left them only adding some self-ironic remarks. I love paradoxes. If those names matter, they may find to tell me about the confusion. Maybe they did. By the wiki page. We'll work on it to be sure. I admit that here I am probably wrong, but I keep on insisting. I sing them all in some weird manner, some magic it may cause. We'll see. But no abc-revelations. I left the starry sky because it was cold, and because everybody was sleeping, I couldn't sing proper anyway. I should live where nobody lives. Where's that? Forests. I should be protected from the wild animals though.

Erato Calliopa Melpomena said I when I thought of eastern order being much more consequent from the physiologic point of view. And that was how I recalled their names for today's chant. Or could it be Calliopa Erato Melpomena. I remember Calliopa from Simpsons, what a shame, they're jewish

And, to my surprise, or maybe not, it didn't work. As you can see, I write some literature and not my linguistic project. Maybe I should sing other muses. The three muses.



ⰀⰁⰂⰃⰄⰅⰆⰇⰈⰉⰊⰋⰌⰍⰎⰏⰐⰑⰒⰓⰔⰕⰖⰗⰘⰙⰚⰛⰜⰝⰞⰟⰠⰡⰢⰣⰤⰥⰦⰧⰨⰩⰪⰫⰬⰭⰮⰰⰱⰲⰳⰴⰵⰶⰷⰸⰹⰺⰻⰼⰽⰾⰿⱀⱁⱂⱃⱄⱅⱆⱇⱈⱉⱊⱋⱌⱍⱎⱏⱐⱑⱒⱓⱔⱕⱖⱗⱘⱙⱚⱛⱜⱝⱞglagolitic

Suddenly, glagolitic scripts remind me the hieroglyphs, predating LinearA, Cretan Hieroglyphs.

They say that Ⱆ the Uku    У, ОУ     /u/     Ukъ     Uk     teaching     Ligature of onъ Ⱁ and izhitsa Ⱛ[64]

That unicode chart does have some weird letters too: Ⱒ is told to be some x, it looks wild.

Ⱝ is called triangular a, and basically ɑ

What were the chances, that they would put labial Ⱊ right after vowel Ⱉ!
Yet how on earth can I even know if that order is genuine!

And looking what Ⱜ was Jeru, Jerъ     Jeru (to my surprise, it has runic name) I found this:



That Ⱜ is probably ' russians use today instead of it. Funny, I think they told me that it was a recent development, as if in the typewriting machines when they removed ъ's at the end of the words.

ab?
add
all
am
an
are
as
at



add
all    am    an
are    as     at


duh
far
ga.. see, I don't know what to add and what not, the pronunciation definitely changed, so what's the point. let's do it in russian, at least in that language I am way more certain about the syllables.

ав или гав? потому что гав is ав (Арно Тали told, that ukrainian way to read г is more ancient and authentic)
ад как первое слово русского словаря? не охуеть ли? Первое слово, которое не буква. Так-то есть и более короткие (нашего внутреннего словаря, что если языки хранятся не совсем в алфавитном порядке, но короткие прежде длинных)

Но давай перечислим буквы, которые слова:

а (ах, и)
б (бы)
в (во)
ж (же)
и
к (ко)
о (об)
с (со)
у
я

а и у я(je~е)
аи  уе? (на какой-нибудь автозаправке в первой половине девяностых могли быть такие слова промеж цифр (аи-70: 1л. = 0.1у.е (the price was given to me by grok, I have little idea about how much it cost back then)))


litre ~ liquid


10 гласных и 10 однобуквенных слов?

половина их: а и о у я одновременно и то и другое,

б
в
ж
к
с

&                    Now this is a weird part, but I had to look. Having writ the book.

е
ё
ы
э
ю

э ~ c ? потому что экс
ю ~ в? потому что вы
ж ~ е or ё, because jeNL and yoGB
б ~ ы потому что бы, потому что ы looks like bɪ
к ~ е or ё? but neither makes sense.



Повод не любить р: она превращает уметь в умерить или умереть
red ~ add?
рука ~ ука?
ром ~ Ом

right ~ aight!    (а вот это крутейшая пара синонимов. ради подобных находок и гадаю)

far is literally fa (a lon-long way to run (to un))

wrong: [rong] ~ [wong] (and r is not that far from w articulatorilly, and even graphically as ᚱ & ᚢ
read ~ eat
writ ~ wit (to eat (въ it))

резать ~ езать? ездить! (ездить туда-сюда (возить туда-сюда))
река ~ ека? эка река

кукареку́ ~ cock'а еку́(ищу́? реку́ ~ ищу́? (зову́))

революция ~ эволюция!

ребята ~ ебята

ха-ха, не надо ничего выдумывать, всё придумано до нас:
Жил-был маленький мальчик, который плохо разговаривал. Однажды пришли к
нему ребята и говороят:
- Пойдем, Вася, с нами на рыбалку!
- Холосо,-отвечает им Вася,-я сейчас пойду и умамы отпласусь
Подходит Вася к маме:
- Мама, мама, можно я сребятами на "ебалку" пойду?
- Еще раз такое слово скажешь, я тебе ребро сломаю!
Выходит Вася к ребятам и говорит:
- "Ебята, меня мама не отпускает на "ебалку".
- Ну иди еще попросись, только вежливо.
Подходит Вася к маме:
- Мама, мама, можно я, пожалуйста, с "ебятами" на "ебалку" пойду?
- Я тебяпредупреждала?! - крикнула мама...
Через 15 минут Вася, весь в бинтах, выходит к ребятам и кричит:
- "Ебята", "ебята", я не пойду свами на "ебалку" - мне мама "ебло"
сломала!


some brits pronounce water as woa (uoa, similar to aoue in Lorraine and eau in French)

Grok gave me some other words for water:
Norman: iâo
Picard: ieu or iau
Orléanais: iau
Champenois: aive or ève
Franco-Provençal: égoua or éva
Occitan: aiga
and if it's true, Eve the Ева could be water. Then Adam is ад, агонь.
Interesting that word for water in hebrew is similar to mam: maim (mother is ima)

and Greek word for Eve is Εὕα (which is very similar to Eau, which is water in french)



Molly & Dolly are both Polly  (I can only wonder why)
Molly is Mary, btw, very interesting. And Dolly is Dorothy and Dolores.

Rick is Dick, which resonates with R & D opposing each other in the k-symmetry.



Мелета, которая Размышление, быть может когната русского слова Мышление, если вторая е подобна е во французском etudent превращающейся в с в английском student: Мслета as in Мыслите (старинное название русской буквы M)



Hadith names the Three Fates cranes,
Then God sent down the revelation. 'By the star when it sets! Your companion has not erred or gone astray, and does not speak from mere fancy…' [Q.53:1] When he reached God's words, "Have you seen al-Lāt and al-'Uzzā and Manāt, the third, the other?' [Q.53:19–20] Satan cast upon his tongue, because of what he had pondered in himself and longed to bring to his people, 'These are the high-flying cranes and their intercession is to be hoped for.'
which resonates with the Hyginus account, who mentions first letters to be in the shape of cranes:
The three Fates created the first five vowels of the alphabet and the letters B and T. It is said that Palamedes, son of Nauplius invented the remaining eleven consonants. Then Hermes reduced these sounds to characters, showing wedge shapes because cranes fly in wedge formation and then carried the system from Greece to Egypt*. This was the Pelasgian alphabet, which Cadmus had later brought to Boeotia, then Evander of Arcadia, a Pelasgian, introduced into Italy, where his mother, Carmenta, formed the familiar fifteen characters of the Latin alphabet. Other consonants have since been added to the Greek alphabet. Alpha was the first of eighteen letters, because alphe means honor, and alphainein is to invent.[9]
The account tells of the 18 letters formed in wedge formation, as if that was said of cuneiform, but then in the context I suspect it to be interconnected and maybe convoluted.

𓅢 (three storks? or, maybe, three cranes? there are no two storks/cranes in egyptian hieroglyphs)

𓅡     saddle-billed stork         Ba-soul (bꜣ)    bꜣ
𓅢    three saddle-billed storks         Ba-souls; metaphorically: Power, glory, respect (bꜣw)

Could it be that bꜣw the baw were the three cranes, three mothers, three first letters of the alphabet? бав as in абв? And if 𓅱 was not w, but s, as I earlier suspected, then bac as in abc.
Then 𓏲 is of C and not of و (but if the generally accepted transliteration correct, then arabic waw is the ancient egyptian shape (it is given here as it would look being written left to right, and if it went right to left, as arabs write, it is reversed, and thus the similarity would be even more striking))




𐡁 (imperial aramaic b) is upside down ב (b in hebrew) the way
𐤁 (phoenician b) is upside down Б (b in russian) which may tell that those are the same object, and that the object could be positioned either way
𐡁 (imperial aramaic b) reminds У (russian U) and if those are the same letters, maybe ᚢ the upside down U is the same object. What could that object be, that it's both Б and U?



любить ~ лепить (во время секса слепляются (влюбиться~влепиться))



abhor as the opposite of adore



Мышление Мелета подсказывает, что Ш это Е (и об этом же student~etudent)

студент и штудировать единят Ш и Σ



Мнема is of memory (a cognate of memory)
в русском Мнить? Однокоренные слова. Мне как корень? и Ма как Мама.

мне как в слове мне? мнение ((при) мне (но) не я? (мнения (мне не ясно? ясно от я?)))

ясно ~ я знаю

сны знают? осознаются! съ н (где н ~ ум? mind ~ my and? my end! самое глубокое)

н = en = end! that is why new is of that n. no is (as) as an objection due to knowing something.
Let's explore that nation-pronoun theory:
I is then of English. i as in eng, which is then ing, and that suffix is special english thing.
Ing.. is it in?
IkNL also agrees with the ing hypothesis, because it's even better closer to it.



These are two orders of old-persian

𐎠a 𐎣k 𐎧x 𐎥g 𐎨c 𐏂ç 𐎩j 𐎫t 𐎰θ 𐎭d 𐎱p 𐎳f 𐎲b 𐎴n 𐎶m 𐎹y 𐎺v 𐎼r 𐎾l 𐎿s 𐏀z 𐏁š 𐏃h 𐎡i 𐎪ji 𐎮di 𐎷mi 𐎻vi
𐎢u 𐎤ku 𐎦gu 𐎬tu 𐎯du 𐎵nu 𐎸mu 𐎽ru

𐎠a   𐎡i   𐎢 u  𐎣k  𐎤ku   𐎥g   𐎦gu    𐎧x   𐎨c   𐎩j   𐎪ji    𐎫t    𐎬tu   𐎭d    𐎮di   𐎯du   𐎰θ   𐎱p    𐎲b   𐎳f   𐎴n   𐎵nu  𐎶m  𐎷mi  𐎸mu  𐎹y  𐎺v  𐎻vi  𐎼r  𐎽ru  𐎾l  𐎿s  𐏀z  𐏁š  𐏂ç  𐏃h

They're rather similar, yet one fundamental difference tosses them up.


And this is some other (it's on my pencil, which I bought in some berlin museum)

𒁺 is boot in cuneiform (and is boot, go, bring in sumerian and akkadian)
And at first I thought (and, maybe, said) that it's position tell that we should rotate the text 90° clockwise and read it that way, because I thought that foot should be standing, because go and bring speak of that position of the leg. But then I thought "what if it is for surgeons mostly? What if the body lays? But now I see the meanings, and I doubt it. Though both cases are possible, and maybe some others too.


maḫ 𒈤 (=MAḪ "great") is great, since I am Mahead, thus Great D read as maḫ add



морить ~ мочить (не тольсо в значении морить ~ мочить коры ~ отмочить, но и в том значении, что морение это пропитка: что-то, подвергшееся процессу морению (выдержке в воде или растворах, особенно древесины, отчего она приобретает тёмный цвет, твердость и прочность))
а также заморить ~ замочить (странно, я думал это свежий жаргон, не базовый (каковым оно всё, скорей всего и является, но что тогда это за что это за это))



Thinking of how marineers are inventive with their language (as if they have a separate language, Argot) I imagined being one, as there is the stav of the border between sky and see, and 𓏏 is for land, as in 𓈎𓅓𓏏


But in hebrew final t means language, not land, and here I see how both start with lan.

So, this I think now, but then I only saw чайку, а чайка выглядит (и рисуется) так: т, словно она тайка, тайка (майка? ямайка?) и всё во мне соглашается оттого что чай~тай макес сенс: как в чай~китай. ки is spirit (in japanese. In chinese its chi, both are c, c is spirit. c is 𓂓! 𒄑? (or 𒍝? (djah?)))

Was egyptian in the centre and our C and 𒄑 bowed in front of it, probably because our wizards were sitting around the phenomenon and observed it from different sides? Were they sitted that way by their nationality?


т is the golden middle between т and т
but then it also adds the serif at the bottom. I think T is for Tree.


Was alphabet a path from Apple to Tree? to Thee?

Was it A B T? Адин дВа Три? A W T? was there some four-root ש for the lower parts are counted, since Ʌ is 1
and W thus is 2
and are Δ and Α in ΔWΑ guards, turning 2 into 4? not necessarily: in english they're T and O.

m as double n reflects double labial, single lingual (be it n or л (as in ΜΛ)) and т(т) as double л contradicts double voiced single voiceless observation, just as т(т) and п(п)


давай ~ дå в-й ~ до в-и ~ до встречи
давай ~ да в-й ~ дå в-и ~ до встречи (да встрече)
да, vie


I just sang эйя in the sense of Аойда


and it felt right, as in эра too, and I remember erato, and that is a good name, considering that the names of muses can be turned into initial vowel, initial labial, initial lingual (which is natural, since there are no others)
Эрато like love song, which even birds can sing. And probably bees too.
and то in Эрато is like да in Аойда.
Beotia are important because of mythologic importance abround alphabetic origins, and because it is four vowels and the two legendary consonants.


j and r are sonors. sonors are definitely its own kind, especially since most of them are in one line.
(all, except r and w(ᚢ~ᚱ (my old question of why are those two so similar, and one thing in wr [r] silent letter w. as silent letter b in lamb (are those be and w both Вы (because they could be excluded not to spell the spell through: by adding вы the w in rite, and b the вы in lamb (lam is ram, and b is baby))))))


мнема не столько понимать, сколько поднимать (в памяти) т.е. помнить. помять? мнема мнёт? морщит лоб! Я здесь ныряю в идею индо-европейскости, но деляю это по своему.

аойда похоже на ария, и немножко на канта(та) но самое интересное в ней то, что она почти вся из гласных. без б. но может й~w~б? аобда? не,Ю нее не гони. Аойда похоже на Гойда.


п sounds lower than т (they are like drum and snare)
is it why bas et hout are read ба и от?


Почему я написал именя уз.. имена муз не с заглавной? Я не уверен что эти имена точны или что они применимы к моей теории. Я помню, как пришлось от Аллат Ал отнять, объявив её определённым артиклем. ла как ляля, потому что в манат ма это мама, а в узза? она бабушка? старики перед смертью гласными говорят, потому что язык не ворочается.


Манат ис пробабли Мнема
Узза не так далеко от Аойда
Ал Лат is similar to Мелета in that both names hsa share that лVт claster (vowels are rather arbitrary: compare рок и рiк.. блин, я до сих пор не размовляю украинской.


Three cranes? Three storks? Three fates and three muses are the same, and thus f~m, t~s, a~u

𓅢    three saddle-billed storks         Ba-souls; metaphorically: Power, glory, respect (bꜣw)
compare it to this one
榮  is  Kyūjitai form of 栄 (honour, glory, flourishing, prosperous, )
which I found in this very volume, looking for 𓅢 by hono.. and I wouldn't find it if it wasn't предворено этим:
The three Fates created the first five vowels of the alphabet and the letters B and T. It is said that Palamedes, son of Nauplius invented the remaining eleven consonants. Then Hermes reduced these sounds to characters, showing wedge shapes because cranes fly in wedge formation and then carried the system from Greece to Egypt*. This was the Pelasgian alphabet, which Cadmus had later brought to Boeotia, then Evander of Arcadia, a Pelasgian, introduced into Italy, where his mother, Carmenta, formed the familiar fifteen characters of the Latin alphabet. Other consonants have since been added to the Greek alphabet. Alpha was the first of eighteen letters, because alphe means honor, and alphainein is to invent.[9]

Isn't it interesting that Pelasgians, Palamedes and Nauplius all have the pl sequence in them.

That myth let tells that the first 7 letters are prehistoric, attir attriu attributed to goddedss goddesses
and others have hgi historic accounts of them, as of Ruca, not mentioned here, the guy who is told to have originated turning C into C & G (if not the first to do so, he was the most, thus that the history remembers him first and foremost, if not only)





алкашам хочется общения, уважения (мысли после того как одного побрил с дунуть)
общение ~ уважение
общение ~ обещание



сенная лихорадка ~ осенняя лихорадка (во всяком случае у меня)
осень ~ о сене
сено ~ с-ено ~ сушено
сушить ~ c-ить? свесить!



It is surprising how many cuneiform glyphs remind their homonymous more letter letters:

E is of ugaritic 𐎅
K is of sumero-akkadian 𒋡 [qa] (a cut (of meat and such) and one sila (the measure unit of capacity))
U, V, Ɔ are probably of 𒌋, which is thus naturally vav.


Surprising though that neither 𐎚 nor 𐎂 are I
𐎚 is t in ugaritic
𐎂 is c in ugaritic (very close phonetically, maybe saying that rotation makes a variant, in such a proximity, that I feel confident rotating them all as if it doesn't change them, though let's be honest the way people pronounce A and 𐤀 is different)

-𒀸 in hittite [-aš]    third-person pronoun    he, she, it

isn't it ich[iʃ] in делаешь (as if russian called deutsch the way they called themselves)
isn't it it in делает? это оно и в африке это. и то is that (probably merged "the it" (то это (the same t in the and it. naturally. the = it he?)))

t is it. es et, not es tee

and what were the chances that it is said in the context of
𐎚 is t in ugaritic
-𒀸 in hittite [-aš]    third-person pronoun    he, she, it
That though grew out of that, but not of that it, of he and [-aš]
Subconsciously I saw it all in front of my eyes. i wrote it.

and there are more to it:
𒀸
Akkadian:
Logogram: 𒀸 • (AŠ)
    Sumerogram of aplum (“heir”)
    (in personal names) Sumerogram of nadānum (“to give”)
    (extispicy) Sumerogram of šēpum (“foot”)
Logogram: 𒀸 • (AŠ)    Akkadogram of ina (“in, on, at”)
Logogram: 𒀸 • (DILI, AŠ)    Sumerogram of wēdum (“single, alone”)
Hittite:
Preposition: 𒀸 • (aš)    INA: in, by, from
Conjunction: 𒀸 • (aš)    AŠ-ŠUM: because
Noun: NA4.AŠ.NU11.GAL "adobe" 𒀸 • (aš)    AŠ.ME "solar disk"    (KUR)URUAŠ.ŠUR "Assur"
Sumerian:
Verb: 𒀸 • (aš)    to be one, single, individual
Verb: 𒀸 • (dili)    to be single, unique, one    to be alone

and neither vertical line is I, neither of the three:

𒁹
Akkadian:
Logogram: 𒁹 • (DIŠ, 1)    Sumerogram of ištēn (“one”)
Determinative: 𒁹 • (DIŠ, diš, I,m, p)
    used before (mainly) masculine personal names.
    marker for beginning sentences and paragraphs.
    repetition marker.
Sumerian:
Numeral: 𒁹 • (diš)    one, 1
Noun: 𒁹 • (santak₄, sag̃tak₄ /sag̃tak/)        (mathematics) triangle             wedge (of a cuneiform sign)
Determinative:  𒁹 • (diš, I, m, p)
    used before (mainly) masculine personal names.
    marker for beginning sentences and paragraphs.
    repetition marker.

𒐕
Sumerian:
Numeral    𒐕 • (g̃eš₂ /g̃ešd/)    sixty, 60

𒑰 is some other sumerian glyph, google hardly even knows it.
yet it knows it: CUNEIFORM PUNCTUATION SIGN OLD ASSYRIAN WORD DIVIDER


And since we're at it, here's Early pictographic signs in archaic cuneiform, used vertically before c. 2300 BC.

The first inscribed tablets were purely pictographic, which makes it technically difficult to determine which language they represent.

Interesting, that the glyph looking like 田 (farm, field) is also about agriculture. The same glyph.

It probably became 𒇻, which is sheep, ram, ovine, yet also to be abundant, and also stir up, mix
Yet more modern cuneiform glyph for sheepfold is this monstrosity 𒁦, which has 𒇻 as inclusion.



слово моральный все сонорные собрало.
нормальный тоже, но оно н дважды использовало.
гласные тоже разные: о а и



Аойда ~ делающая аой? вой? пой! рой тоже жужжит, но это черри-пикинг.

А О И
            that's ogham's                                               


a reminds ה and also 𓄿, so is ה that eagle too? or are they nothing but similarity of shapes
א reminds 𓄿 more
and isn't א being ה with a diacritic in the right top corner?



間 is ma in japanese and jian in chinese.
As ma it is middel, as jian it is only similar to den, which is also given as its translation by g.t.
middel is a middle with a typor
It is also room and interval in space or time.

I found it in 田間 [tiánjiān (тхен дзие́н)] which is field, farm in chinese, and not in japanese.
And, look: 田閒 [tián xián (тхен сен)], another word for field, and field only

閒 is idle, interstice, separate in chinese; and doesn't seem to be known in japanese.



god ~ guide



девчонка хоть куда в детстве понимал иначе



диалог выхватил
— обшвырял меня по деньгам, и всё равно выкрутился, такой ушлый парень
— ну, для ужа он довольно толстоват
ушлый от уж? (но чел походу просто не расслышал)


ж как живой, ш как шивелится (шевелится)



vowels ~ bowels     (видимо, из-за отрыжки, но может и меха лёхких к bowels относили)



Do



𒅗 shows that it's to be read rotated 90, and since they say that they go left-to-right, thus not european, but chinese manner. Which also makes sense by the way chinese strokes remind these cuneiform strokes

𒁺 is another example of the same angle. And the table of the previous image shows that too.
 

The predecessor of cuneiform:

it looks as if really knowing this stuff one can decypher the indus script

Will I ever be able to read it? Who knows, but it seem I can see the starshape an the 𒀭 in the rectangle third from the bottom and fourth from the right and few others.
And the 𒊹 is told to be 3600
It's told to be Sale of a number of fields, probably from Isin, c. 2600 BC. which may explain the numerals part.


𒆙, huh? This and many others don't even seem to be decyphered yet.


ChatGPT is fine too.
it tells me that elamite zari is cognate to arabic zar and cognate to yel in yellow and жел in жёлтый
And reminds me of феномен буба-кики, быть может порождённый формой букв B & K.
Внезапно он понимает клинопись лучше чем Grok (но я вожусь с третьим, может четвёртый не хуже, а то и пятый вроде выходит если не выше ещё)
𒆙   liri₇ / liru₇ / lirum₇ – "сила"
Структурное описание    Знак KAL, пересечённый другим KAL
Декодирование    Полностью расшифрован: смысл и фонетика известны

Знак KAL, означающий "сильный": 𒆗

Говорит, что 𒋡 может быть использован и как чисто фонетический знак без смысла: ка, га, и другие.

It also told me that buba/kiki phenomenon is universal and also works with illitirate and chinese.
Yet I would consider that report a replication crisis candidate, for naturally they saw the letters.

But what if it's natural, what if B like this because гуБы, liPs, but I arbitrarily capitalize by cherry picking technique, yet what if li is le, the the, and гу is ה the the, and could ה be гɪ? гו? the ה ו?
then surely more examples can come along.. let's find them..
гуляй гулять но думал это блядь
гуляш из ляшек? народная этимология отстой. она вся народная, академики часть народа и не обязательно лучшая.
гурьба
кутерьма.. глупое задание. омонимичность морфем неизбежна. но и неслучайной может быть.

гуталин  не  таллинн  в нём видимо корень гу как в goo, как в грязь и прочее г.

гусь S?
why doesn't duck has S? is ck their C the С the S?
then d is g, for both are g

g for жёлудь? ж похоже на лист дуба (на котором жёлуди растут)

Сегодня только в тетради (shining north 1) писал о том, что лист берёзы похож на B? Б? b! и b
And maple leaf looks like M when it's one way, and
лист клёна похож на К when it is turned 90° of M

And now I recall that I saw it somewhere: Ⰿ the glagolitic M looks pretty much like K turned 90°.

MK of manjurian candidate and mind control ultra makes it spicy. just as AMZ, like wtf: those three are objectively initial, middle and final letters, and they're the name of the madhouse where I live, like very trumanshowish.

good ~ the D? D is for Добро, but not in english, there it's G
д the g the g are literally добро, and recently I saw russian name of some other letter to be true in the context. Not sure I wrote it down.
G and D as God and Devil. Devil is of Deus, and maybe it makes it cognate of Добро, добры, добра, добру, о добре

добрО
добрА
добрУ
добрО
добрОМ
о добрЕ

добры
добръ
добра было но в другой форме. Оп Почему эти формы совпадают?

добро среднего рода
добра женского рода и родительный подеж мужского и среднего рода
потому и женского рода, что родит?


Аз Буки Веди
вЯз Букъ В? Г? Дуббб
ЯСень Букъ Дуб

Ясень is Ash.. was it used as firewood?



Cуп ~ съ п ~ съ питьём?
Soup ~ Coup?

up is an in ..wait. is it the risk of talking to ai too much? It's rather overwhelming:
it was an offered cognate. an is sky in elamite, and an is sky. Yet
an is up in proto indo-european, they reconstructed it as such.

Elamite Word	Meaning	Possible Cognate(s)	Notes
šak	king	Sanskrit śakra, PIE sek- (“power”)	Similar root meaning: authority
mu‑uk‑ti	master/lord	Latin magister, PIE meg- (“great”)	Possibly related to “magnate”
nap	god	Sanskrit napāt (descendant, deity)	Maybe from shared cultural ideas
tukul	weapon	Akkadian tukul; PIE teg- (“cover”)	Appears in Akkadian too
hal	city/land	Germanic hall (place, hall), PIE kel- (“cover, shelter”)	Possible false cognate
kur	mountain/land	Sumerian kur, PIE ker- (“high”)	Adopted widely in Mesopotamian languages
an	sky, heaven	Sumerian an, PIE an- (“up”)	Cultural borrowing
me	deity-power, fate	Sumerian me, PIE meh- (“measure”)	Conceptual resemblance
šimut	name	Hebrew shem, Arabic ism, PIE nōmn̥	Semitic cognate more likely
zari	gold	Persian zar, PIE ghel- (“yellow”)	Regional borrowing
napir	god	See nap above	Common deity suffix
temti	eye or vision	PIE dem- (“to build/form”)	Semantic stretch
kalme	strong	PIE kel- (“strong/swollen”)	Possible distant link
napuš	life	PIE nebh- (“nurture”)	Speculative
ir	man/husband	PIE wiHrós (man), Sumerian er	Overlapping forms

The table is from ChatGPT, and here's Gemini:
"Proto-Indo-European *an" can refer to two things: the hypothetical ancestral language of the Indo-European language family (Proto-Indo-European or PIE) and a specific reconstructed particle *h₂en from that language, meaning "on, upon". The particle *h₂en is seen in descendants like English "an," "on," and German "an".

Grok, Gemini, GPT, why do they all begin with G? Is it the will of the technology itself? Or are they all masons or gangsters or consider it god?


Willow is for S in ogham, and thinking of how much wavy leaf of willow goes, it makes perfect sense to have it to be S.


John pronounced like John, but it sounds very much like Jon (with [j] not [dʒ])
(in case it is deleted, it's Paul getting award for Let It Be)


Dad sounds pretty much as тять (в значении тятя, папа, dad (thus тятя is a cognate of daddy (not something we already didn't know)))





Trees bloom at different time and thus may be used as calendar.
Letters could be influenced by their shapes (most likely by leaves, you can determine the tree by the leaf, and in early criminology it could be used: the print of the feet denotes the animal, thus hungers were before human-hunters? They could see where the beast came from by the layers of trees which stuck to the wheels and boots. Probably clothes could predict the alphabet. Alphabet is just the recent period of the history of writing.

And trees (or, more likely, their elements) would determind the shape of the letters. letter and leaf both begin with le. thus could ᚦ be the rudiment of the oak-leaf? for it has many such bulbs all around the contour of the leaf. all around the perimetre of imaginary inner leaf. An the differences would made the difference. Thus, leading from the hypothesis of ᚦ being simplified this:


When you see it like this, it even has some semblence with ᚦ
How reliable is the source is hard to say, it mostly corresponds what I earlier saw, but that Y glyph is not, and the . is ᚜ and legit. Yet why did she omit ᚍ is a mistery to me.



Lo Boièr ("The Oxherd", also known as Le Bouvier in French)
the vowelness of Boièr made me think of what if it is a way to write UoièA?
And Oxherd.. Ox is told to be what A is. Could it be that the oxherd is the alphabet?
It would explain the AEIOU part, so let's check the lyrics.