I expect this log to start lagging in these 49 days, so that I live 49 years when this book reaches full 49 volumes. Like what were the chances? What were the chances

Yet I'm panicking that I have water in my head. After bathing. Not the basing (I didn't build the base. I move too slow, because whoever tricked me gave me this theory, and it didn't promise me recognition, just that I make it, and I made it, but it's a trick, a joke. A Jock.

So I prepare to both scenarios: But I'm not prepared to death at all. I played big, and yet I forgot of the time limit I chose. Can I rechoose.
(each paragraph is a separate thought, they're not chaos, they're thoughts, good and so-so)
A is not Ace, that is the conspiracy of assholes: as, but, assist, rebuttal, analyze, заднеязычные.
(they insert such shame at different parts of languages, but in all languages they have influence at, and that's a lot (but this is the worst type of conspiracy theories: speculation))

A is one. A.

2 is beth?
3 is daleth!
4 is е
5 is z
6 is G
7 is Z!?
8 is H (𓎛)
9 is j
10 is I all over the globe. First of al;l in hebrew. In latin I is 9 nIn [nain (I is ai)]
11 eleven.. I'm trippin..     Θ is 8.. or is it nine? 9 is g
ΘgH
abcd        1234
efZΘgH   5678910?
Did drift in numerals (from octal to decimal) influence the letters too!
ABCD
EFGH  thise are octave. H~A! Did they continue to write the next octave with other letters of the alphabet. Musical Notation! I thought we were speaking of numbers.
Alphabet are three (mothers! matters! math, myth/mysl, mus) in one (a i u tell that such is the direction of the three. Math came first, we counted things in writing tens of millenia before we could discuss or even describe things in writing)

IKLMN seems to be the semi-decimal line,
OPRST then is the other one. And it seems some wanted to introduce even larger musical mode.

Probably both are pentatonica. Was it quadrophonia or what would you call it. After triad comes tetrad! Wow, pythagoras tetraktis after trikits triktis. tetraktis is before pentanotic mode (or is it scale?)

abcd
iгзч would make better would make a better 1234
iгзчs is how hindu alphabet goes, but s seems to be out of order. ч is джь? for г and з are voiced.
четыре and four are very voiceless. четы~fou? фу ~ чё ты? и слово и словосочетание могут быть взаимозаменяемы, смысл один и тот же. Удивительно, да? four is foul? фу. but in chinese it's shi.
The She? San or Mi, not Three. She is not Four. Different languages. Why though. Numerals they all know them. Why are they differently named? I think that letters may be read differently because different words are started with them in them. Could the same be the case for numbers?

Could numbers and letters be the same thing? And they were. Now we have two ways to look at them. Numerals have readings and the graphical side. Letters do too. If letter sounds.. mi and ni are syllables and numerals at the same time. But i for one is not in kana. but it's in latin and greek, dafuq!

Very raw meat in the two previous paragraphs. Yet not grey because it drives into something interesting. Numerals and letters. As the same phenomenon. Becan G Began in syllables.

Because names are memorized better than ideas of theirs, it could be the other way around too:
Names are what we have to memorize. A name tells nothing of a man. That's why we focus on it. Or maybe we focus on them because a tree isn't offended when we do not remember its name.

A   B   C   D
E    F  GH
I         JK   L M N
O    P    Q   R S T
U VW   XY Z

In the centre of it all, JK

XYZ are greek letters

A   B   C   D
E    F  GH
I         JK   L M N
O    P    Q   R S T
   V

A   B   C   D
E    F  GH
I         JK   L M N
O    P    Q   R S T V Isn't M there to give birth to W? both U and V, both vowel and labial. And we borrowed linguals from greeks. We romans, duh.

The position of Θ may tell that it's linual:

A   B   C   D
E    F  GH Θ?
I         JK   L M N
O    P    Q   R S T V

but isn't it

ΑΒΓΔ
ΕΖΗΘ
ΙΚΛΜΝΞ
ΟΠΡΣΤ
ΥΦΧΨΩ

so why not

ΑΒΓΔ
ΕΖΗΘ
ΙΚΛΜΝΞ
ΟΠΡΣΤ
ΥΦΧΨΩ    ?

because it's out of order.
they say it was

ΑΒΓΔ
ΕϜΖΗΘ
ΙΚΛΜΝΞ
ΟΠϚΡΣΤ
ΥΦΧΨΩϠ so clumsy.

of
ΑΒΓΔΕϜΖΗΘ
ΙΚΛΜΝΞΟΠϚ
ΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩϠ

the three letters, one per each row (and did Ϝ replace Θ not to stand obviously the last in the line as the other two?)
Russians borrowed θ as Ф, russians didn't distinguish much between Ѳ and Ф. No regulations were present, they used only one or only the other, and maybe in some periods they used them both. But that's not for sure, the first one I read somewhere and the second one I only vaguely remember.

So, looking at that mess, it is clear that those who created alphabet had different numeral system in mind. Θ would be 8?

Why these speculations. Let's party and let the revelations come by themselves.



A team of archaeologists from the Cambridge Theban Tombs Project, led by Nigel Strudwick, discovered the inscribed piece of limestone in 1995 in a tomb that belonged to an Egyptian official named Sennefer, and recently Schneider studied and deciphered it. While the text is written in hieratic — a form of Egyptian hieroglyphic writing — "all [the] words appear to be of foreign linguistic origin" and are mostly Semitic, wrote Schneider in his paper.

One side of the limestone piece contains a series of Egyptian hieroglyphic symbols that represent the words "bibiya-ta" (a word that can mean "earth snail"), "garu" (a word that can mean "dove") and "da'at" (a word that can mean "kite"), Schneider wrote in his paper. More than 3,000 years ago, the "g" would have represented the sound that "c" does today, Schneider told Live Science. This means that the first letter of each of these words is the ancient equivalent of "BCD." [Photos: 5,000-Year-Old Hieroglyphs Discovered in Sinai Desert]
And this is pretty much why I brought it here. There it says that B was the first letter. But where do they read? Isn't they reading the second line? The bi bi sequence is there, and it is modern cursive hebrew ב, only it's reversed. Just like 𓃀 to be
The previous word can easily be the A-word. But then that ostracon as if ostracized further, the upper piece is so shart, could it not be chipped off in millenia? Just buried somewhere, they do not decay for no reason. Not fall off  due to gravity. What am I saying, I know nothing of these things.
And what is the last line? Here we can see four to five lines (the first one could be the title)
But no, there certainly was an image, above the bug.



“The script is known as hieratic and is not problematic; the spelling of the words is, however, unusual,” Dr. Haring wrote in e-mail to Ancient Origins. “The first word is probably hy-hnw, ‘to rejoice’ (read from right to left), with the figure of a rejoicing man (itself also a hieratic character) at the far left.
“The problem is thus not the script, but the spellings, and the interpretation of some words on the ostracon remains highly uncertain. What is not uncertain, however, is the order of the initial consonants in the first four lines: hlhm. Alphabetic ordering indicates alphabetic awareness, and the signs in the left column may very well have been used as alphatic characters.”
So the fourth is M, and probably mi, like are chinese and japanese using a 5000 year old glyph? and water the mizu.
The other side of the inscribed piece of limestone also contains a series of Semitic words written in hieratic, Schneider said. They spell out the words "hahāna lāwī ḥelpat mayyin leqab." The first letters of the first four words in that series — the letters "hlhm" — represent the first few letters of another ancient alphabetic sequence, one that never became as popular as the ancient forerunner to our alphabet.

These words form a phrase that means, "to make pleasant the one who bends reed, water [according] to the Qab." The "qab" is a unit of measurement that equals about 1.2 liters, Schneider wrote. This phrase likely helped the person who wrote this inscription to remember the first few letters of this alphabetic sequence, Schneider said.
The phrase is so stupid I wonder if they translated it acccurately. And they themselves say that spelling of some words is weird:
«the spelling of the words is, however, unusual,” Dr. Haring wrote in e-mail to Ancient Origins.»
that can be explained by this:
«"all [the] words appear to be of foreign linguistic origin" and are mostly Semitic, wrote Schneider in his paper.»
Not only russians have oreshkins, who read some ancient writings from russian perspective.


"bibiya-ta" (a word that can mean "earth snail") букашка (жук же нарисован (bug))
"garu" (a word that can mean "dove") голубь (garu не похоже на dove, но похоже на голубь)
"da'at" (a word that can mean "kite") коршун, bird of prey.
and this sequence could depict how one eats the other. And this translation could be more to the point.

-

арёл
сову
синичку
именно такой порядок в 𓄿𓅓𓅱 А! Ум! and синичка is si. I heard it speaking and it's no u
    Арёл Варона Снегирь? так оно в русском было бы?
А̊рёл Филин Соловей

In hindi owl is ullú, उल्लू
In hindi the diacritic of low is below. In arabic it's above. So arabs place diacritic below for what in Europe we consider high. In Indo-Euopean.
Can it relate to what the two meganations consider good and bad?


⋮    The character "⋮". An ellipsis (three dots) vertically aligned. It is sometimes used to communicate the continuation of a list vertically as opposed to horizontally. It is also a mathematic notation which means "is divisible by" or "is a multiple of".

This wandering through my collection of glyphs brought me a treasure:  ּ
HEBREW POINT DAGESH OR MAPIQ or shuruk        Diacritical mark
    dagesh, used to denote a geminated consonant (dagesh khazak or dagesh forte), or a consonant pronounced as a plosive as opposed to as a fricative (dagesh kal or dagesh lene).
    mappiq or mapiq, used to indicate that the letters ה or א are to be pronounced as consonants in positions where they usually indicate a vowel.
    shuruk sign, used with ו to indicate the long u vowel sound.

Asked Grok to elaborate on that previous line of hebrew letters playing like matres lectiones, and it insists that ע is not, and especially not ع, but here it gives me a perfect example where it is: عين /ʕayn/ eye
I suspect that weird concept of glottal stops and glottal fricatives is maintained to preserve the disgusting semitic pronunciation of those letters. All those vomiting sounds.


трут-глагол и трут-существительное как одно слово (со времён получения огня трением или от слова труха подобной опилкам как результату трения)



Emma
The name Emma is of Germanic origin, meaning "whole" or "universal". It likely originated as a short form of names containing the element "ermen" or "irmen" (strength), such as Ermengarde or Ermentrude. The first known use of the name in written sources is Emma of Austrasia, a Frankish woman.
I saw em of hebrew and ma of english. Universal mother? Ani and Me

n and m know we and even asians.
n is ni, ニ, 二
m is mi, ミ, 三

l is el (one and only)
le is el (depends on language: Grok tells both come from ille, shortened it differently)

I~l N M O (O~٥)

٠ ١ ٢ ٣ ٤ ٥ ٦ ٧ ٨ ٩

٤ is Ξ

ΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ

٦ ~ П ~ 𐌐 (cursive p is Г-like (with wave instead of the upper bar)
Interesrting, isn't it, П is for пара, double Т, and yet

٧ ٨ ٩ are great for r s t as the final set.  And letters before I are also ten (or nine? a b g d e v z h θ is the most I can give (though ugaritic has five letters in first line)

𐎀a 𐎁b 𐎂c 𐎃ḫ 𐎄d 𐎅h(e) 𐎆w 𐎇z 𐎈ḥ 𐎉θ 𐎊и 𐎋k
𐎌 š 𐎍l 𐎎m 𐎏 ḏ 𐎐(𐎃 rotated 90°)n 𐎑 ẓ 𐎒s 𐎓ʿ(ɔ) 𐎔п 𐎕ṣ 𐎖q 𐎗r
𐎘ṯ 𐎙ġ 𐎚t
          𐎛ỉ 𐎜 ủ 𐎝s̀

𐎀a 𐎁b 𐎂c 𐎃ḫ 𐎄d                                                         5
𐎅h(e) 𐎆w 𐎇z 𐎈ḥ 𐎉θ                                                  5
𐎊и 𐎋k 𐎌 š 𐎍l 𐎎m 𐎏 ḏ 𐎐(𐎃 rotated 90°)n 𐎑 ẓ 𐎒s   7
𐎓ʿ(ɔ) 𐎔п 𐎕ṣ 𐎖q 𐎗r 𐎘ṯ 𐎙ġ 𐎚t                                      8
𐎛ỉ 𐎜 ủ 𐎝s̀                                                                   3

I looked into it before, speculating of whether it was 25 of 5×5

If they were five pentatonic "octaves" what would it be "sexaves"
In pentatonic scales, the term "intervals" is often used instead of "octaves" to describe the distances between notes, as pentatonic scales consist of five notes per octave and focus on specific intervals (e.g., major second, minor third) rather than the full octave span of a diatonic scale. However, the term "octave" itself is still used to describe the doubling of frequency (e.g., from C to C), so context matters. If referring to the scale's structure, "intervals" or "steps" is more common.

𐎀a 𐎁b 𐎂c 𐎃ḫ 𐎄d 𐎅h(e) 𐎆w 𐎇z 𐎈ḥ 𐎉θ 𐎊и 𐎋k                              12
𐎌 š 𐎍l 𐎎m 𐎏 ḏ 𐎐(𐎃 rotated 90°)n 𐎑 ẓ 𐎒s 𐎓ʿ(ɔ) 𐎔п 𐎕ṣ 𐎖q 𐎗r    10 (12? but what's the proof?)
𐎘ṯ 𐎙ġ 𐎚t                                                                                           3
          𐎛ỉ 𐎜 ủ 𐎝s̀                                                                              3
as on that tablet goes places A M Ṯ at the beginning of the lines, and that Ṯ is not the T which follows soon and that makes it even closer to ש of אמש


Did I found some magic? ABC-like texts to make them basic as abc

I'm an ultrazionist. I want all jews into Israel.
a) because they're really naughty, and something is to be done about it. And this way maybe they stop annoying other nations and thus we have a bigger chance of avoiding the total holocoast.
b) because that's the way to summon mochiah. And though only believers believe that, atheists may get satisfied with the other reasons; and this one should be real big for everyone who believes.
c) because maybe concentrating their brainpower in the nation state may make them deliver something fascinating, something for which they can be proud, to transform their хитрость into мудрость
isn't nazi is zion reversed in a way?


A a a α
B b Б б V β              V~twofingersmyfirend (fire~pyre (the guy with whom you will be burnt))
C Ц Ч S T g g γ        g~დ
D d დ Δ g Д д δ       Δ дом    D дверь    d ?    დ~g

E e ε
F f Ф ф φ
G g g Г γ
H h Х х η 
I i И и η
J j Ж
К k к
L l Л Λ
M м m μ
N n Н н ν
ξ
О ο
P p П π
R r Р р ρ
S s ſ C σ/ς Σ
T t т τ
U u У у υ
V Ф ф F f φ
X χ x (as W w, nothing to tell of that. but differently: W is just not in any other script)
ψ and is it W? because it looks pretty much like that. And so does ω. And both are unique in greek.
Z.. wait. ψ also looks like ψ, and that's the letter I missed.
Y y й ψ Ψ ?
Z З ω ζ

З ω Е m

E m З ω is more alphabetic. With ω belonging to the next line, just as ЕFГI do
E m З ω is cross-cut of A M S and ω is unique for greek, latin ends with З
E M З as three phases of the SUN!!! SUZ (SoλνZe)
A M Z actually. A is read as e? and it is correct? as in pan? as in base. bass.
A and if it's base, B a C?

or should I compare only by alphabetic position? Alphabetic positions change, and I have no interest in such mundane mechanical work.


two fingers ~ my friends
V (вы, peace)
W (we, war (вы и вы, разделил, создал две стороны этим словом
V is for singular Вы
W is for plural вы.


I V X L C D


In Hesiod's Theogony, the Charites are the three daughters of Zeus: Aglaea ("Splendor"), Euphrosyne ("Joy"), and Thalia ("Good Cheer"), by the Oceanid Eurynome.[5] The identical genealogy is given by Apollodorus.[6] The same three names are also given by Pindar, with a possible reference to their "father" Zeus and no mother mentioned.[7] Although the Charites were usually considered to be Zeus' daughters and three in number, their names as well as their parentage and number varied.[8] Homer mentions Pasithea as "one of the youthful Graces",[9] and perhaps has "Charis" (the singular form of "Charites"), as the name of another,[10] but does not give their parentage, number, or any other of their names.[11]

The geographer Pausanias gives other variations, some regional.[12] He says that, according to Boeotian tradition, Eteocles, the king of Orchomenus, established three as the number of Charites, but that the Athenians and Spartans worshipped only two. For the Athenians the two Charites were Auxo and Hegemone, while for the Spartans they were Cleta and Phaenna.[13] Also, according to Pausanias, the Hellenistic poet Hermesianax said that Peitho ("Persuasion") was one of the Charites, and the poet Antimachus said that the Charites were the "daughters of Aegle and the Sun [Helios]".[14]



Isn't to serve a synonym of to slave? To enslave is the word I was thinking of. But then isn't thrall is the synonym to enthrall and enthral?!
But though it's a nice mindplay (all the politicians serve in that sense) but that was said by a tennis player, and it tells that he died of hiv, thus they killed him with chemo. So, now, is it wise to ell t (tell, let know) the populace of that? To what objective would you do that?


Is comfortable four or one syllable? And hey, now I know the syllabic nature of silent e.
e-a: e(iou)a
and greek added two more vowels to turn pentatonic into septacord. Was it a way to translate from one instrument to the other? Who knows what music scales were in the antiquity. It's even more obscure than the alphabets of those times.



here, somebody transliterated tetragrammaton understanding the proximity of alphabets correctly:
(but then wouldn't it be iefe? understanding the nature of vav too)

𐦀‎ 𐦁‎ 𐦂‎ 𐦃‎ 𐦄‎ 𐦅‎ 𐦆‎ 𐦇‎ 𐦈‎ 𐦉‎ 𐦊‎ 𐦋‎ 𐦌‎ 𐦍‎ 𐦎‎ 𐦏‎ 𐦐 ‎ 𐦑‎ 𐦒‎ 𐦓‎ 𐦔‎ 𐦕‎ 𐦖‎ 𐦗‎ 𐦘‎ 𐦙‎ 𐦚‎ 𐦛‎ 𐦜‎ 𐦝‎ 𐦞‎ 𐦟
𐦠‎ 𐦡‎ 𐦢‎ 𐦣‎ 𐦤‎ 𐦥‎ 𐦦‎ 𐦧‎ 𐦨‎ 𐦩‎ 𐦪‎ 𐦫‎ 𐦬‎ 𐦭‎ 𐦮‎ 𐦯‎ 𐦰‎ 𐦱‎ 𐦲‎ 𐦳‎ 𐦴‎ 𐦵‎ 𐦶‎ 𐦷‎     𐦼‎ 𐦽‎ 𐦾‎ 𐦿‎ 𐧀‎ 𐧁‎ 𐧂‎ 𐧃‎ 𐧄‎ 𐧅‎ 𐧆‎ 𐧇‎ 𐧈‎ 𐧉‎ 𐧊‎ 𐧋‎ 𐧌‎ 𐧍‎ 𐧎‎ 𐧏‎ 𐧒‎ 𐧓‎ 𐧔‎ 𐧕‎ 𐧖‎ 𐧗‎ 𐧘‎ 𐧙‎ 𐧚‎ 𐧛‎ 𐧜‎ 𐧝‎ 𐧞‎ 𐧟‎ 𐧠‎ 𐧡‎ 𐧢‎ 𐧣‎ 𐧤‎ 𐧥‎ 𐧦‎ 𐧧‎ 𐧨‎ 𐧩‎ 𐧪‎ 𐧫‎ 𐧬‎ 𐧭‎ 𐧮‎ 𐧯‎ 𐧰‎ 𐧱‎ 𐧲‎ 𐧳‎ 𐧴‎ 𐧵‎ 𐧶‎ 𐧷‎ 𐧸‎ 𐧹‎ 𐧺‎ 𐧻‎ 𐧼‎ 𐧽‎ 𐧾‎ 𐧿
Let's compare it to proto-sinaitic..

and it doesn't seem like they really have many similar shapes in common. Maybe only the bull's head and a human figure, since both of them are vowel in meroitic and the one in proto-sinaitic is transliterated as ה. Here are three proto-sinaitic writings compared to egyptian hieroglyphs.

It also shows how fucking ancient is the russian Б glyph.

And to close today's session, let's look at the structure from a perspective we seldom use: