עולמו его мир
עולמה её мир

עולמי мировой
העולם שלי мой мир
העולם שלנו наш мир
העולם שלך твой мир, ваш мир
העולם שלהם их мир                      (של ~ of)



Highduk is a truer scientist than academic scientitsts, and he dropped his linguistic uni, just as I did.
And our conversation lead to these depths:

John S. Mbiti - African religions and philosophy (1970, Archor Books) - libgen.li.pdf
(I share the books as librarians hide scrolls of their libraries when faggots burn them. What do you want, huh? $25? $250000 for everything I downloaded? More? Charge me, faggots, I pay it when I can. You do not intimidate me for I am doing what is morally right)
(we were speaking of what I heard as a claim of this author that africans have no future, he helped me go deeper than that hearsay. Через полтора часа разговора:)

> Ну, он считает, что глаголы в будущем времени описывают только ближайшее будущее

(I post that table)

> В крайнем правом столбце

да

> Собственно, пытается обосновать тезис, что концепта "когда-нибудь" у его земляков нет
(here I learnt that empty spaces matter (without it wouldn't know who was speaking))
Может коррелировать с отсутствием понятия обслуживание, уход, чтоб когда-нибудь не сломалось. Обычно говорят про способность к планированию, и интеллект вообще. Но это не только их проблема, просто у них она более выражена. Уход ещё менее понятное слово чем обслуживание. Клиента в ресторане обслуживание? Уход куда? (это к невошедшему сюда замечанию о недостаточной усвоенности понятия maintenance в русской культуре тоже)
(речь шла о следующем видео в контексте той книги)

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by CultureTree (@culturetree)

(mirrored, in case some offended majesties dare to delete it)
«There is no African country (I've done it through Kenya, through.. I've done it all) that has an equivalent of the word maintenance»
Mama we're Africa

латинское teneo выдало equivalent слову maintenance: поддержка, поддержание, содержание,

Гайдук дядька популярный, не буду ему этот абзац присылать если не продолжит сам эту тему.




by direct borrowing ~ dirrectly borrowing



я в африке он, но мама и мню универсальны. Мы пили из одного источника? Из единой матери?
muntu~maður, но mu всего лишь приставка
kakima~cake, но ka всего лишь приставка, such cakes are not even bakima, which would be bake, but tubima. kima and bima are thing and things, thus ka is probably eat, but let's check it. eat in kituba is kutia, as кушать. Not so far from the ka indeed. k-a.
I eat ~ Mu ke diaka
You eat ~ Nge ke dia
Nge ke ~ You're   
dia ~ here                did they mess up it via russian есть?
                                or is est~ест an universal thing?
But then, here, as rather often in this work, to be fair, I use g.t. which messes up from time to time. And here i would never know. Maybe they have some luddite movement not wanting foreigners to know their language. Maybe those occasional bugs natural and unintentional.
But wait, according to that table ke is literally is.

ke ~ c ~ 's

You can eat ~ Nge lenda dia.
can is lenda, dia is translated as here, but here is translated back as awa.
eat is kudia, and that is that very dia with the prefix ku, so does кушать have that african prefix?

На угад ткнул badia, переводит see; проверил see, переводит kumona; проверил kumona, переводит find; проверил mona, переводит here. Это универсальный place holder? Did some african substituted undertranslated words as here, trying to tell that here you should work on it better.


Еврейская закрытость может привести к их погибели. Они должны распространять свою культуру среди гоев вместо того чтоб пытаться деструктивно конструировать гойскую культуру.
Почему я знаю хуцпа, но не знаю мицва? Про микву даже знал. Is лихва тоже еврейское слово?

Это ли меня беспокоит? погибель геев? блядь, почему геев, евреев же. Я знаю почему.
Так что меня беспокоит? Враждебность евреев. Как бы это противостояние не закончилось, оно вредит и может повредить ещё сильнее обоим сторонам. Или пусть оно будет вечно, тем поддерживая нашу вечность? Может это наш backbone, common enemy to work together, to blame somebody else?



Grok доставляет:
"ещё и" = добавка + усиление    Он богат, ещё и умён.    He’s rich, and even smart.
"ещё" = still    Он ещё спит.    He’s still sleeping.
"ещё" = again/more    Возьми ещё кусок.    Take another piece.
"ещё не" = not yet    Он ещё не пришёл.    He hasn’t come yet.
потрясающе удобный инструмент



романское двойное L меж гласных превращающееся в Й перекликается с русским словом делать, раньше звучащим как деяти. Из чего следует вопрос: а не является ли й тем, как л изначально звучало? Не было ли lmn abc-образной строкой IMN? Amen (اMeN)
боль ~ бой?


Аппий Клавдий Цек (fl. c. 312–279 BC) Аппию принадлежит идея модернизации латинского языка, в частности, некоторые изменения в орфографии. В правописании некоторых слов он заменил букву S между гласными буквой R, приведя таким образом нормы письменного языка в соответствие с живой речью, в которой вследствие ротацизма звук [s] в интервокальной позиции заменился на [r][130]. В результате Фузии стали Фуриями, Валезии — Валериями, Папизии — Папириями[135]. Кроме того, он исключил из латинского алфавита букву Z (которая была вновь восстановлена лишь в I веке н.э., переместившись при этом с седьмой позиции в алфавите на последнюю).
Appius wrote several books over his life. He wrote a book called Sententiae, which was based upon a verse of Greek model. It was "the first Roman book of literary character".[20] Appius also wrote treatise, De Usurpationibus ("Concerning Usurpations"), which is lost and the content is unknown. In addition Appius was one of the earliest known Roman prose and verse authors whose name is still known today. He was also concerned with literature and rhetoric, and instituted reforms in Latin orthography, allegedly ending the use of the letter Z

Spurius Carvilius Rūga (Latin pronunciation: [s̠purius̠ käru̯ilʲius̠ ruːɡä], fl. 230 BCE) was the freedman of Spurius Carvilius Maximus Ruga. He is often credited with inventing the Latin letter G. His invention would have been quickly adopted in the Roman Republic, because the letter C was used for both the /k/ and /g/ sounds.

Grok:
No surviving abecedary (alphabet list) exists from the narrow window between:~250 BCE: Appius Claudius Caecus (as censor) reportedly removed Z from the official Roman alphabet (because it was unused in Latin and sounded like /s/), reducing it to 20 letters (A B C D E F Z → A B C D E F H I K L M N O P Q R S T V X).
~230 BCE: Spurius Carvilius Rūga (a freedman and schoolmaster) introduced G (a modified C) to distinguish /ɡ/ from /k/, inserting it in Z’s former 7th position:
A B C G D E F H I K L M N O P Q R S T V X
(21 letters, the direct ancestor of our 26-letter alphabet).

That ~20-year gap is too brief and too early for any physical abecedary (inscribed alphabet sequence) to have survived.

The oldest Latin abecedaries are from ~100 BCE or later (e.g., the Forma Urbis-style lists or school exercises on ostraca). All postdate Carvilius and include G.

Z was not erased from existing texts — it simply wasn’t taught or used in new writing. No one carved “ABCDEFGH…” without Z and without G on durable material during this micro-window.

Formal alphabet teaching (via abecedaries) only became common after Carvilius opened the first known fee-based school (~234 BCE). His own students would have learned the new 21-letter version with G.

I took some liberties with russian alphabet there to keep left and right in place, once Л came to that end, yet I shouldn't have lacked labial after O, because in russian it's Лево Право:

Now let's check the lineal symmetry of such:

A Б Г Д
Е В Ж З
И М Н Л
О Пр С Т
У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ
ъ Ы ь Э Ю Я 
(ё is just е with trema)

Here it looks like georgian by entending the symmetry beyond T and making the post-T line extra long; not as long as in georgian though. Yet it adds a whole line of vowels and such. If all the post-T letters are counted, russian has 13 of them, georgina has 14 of them, arabic has 13 of them. Could it be that georgians add a letter afterwords? Could it be that everybody did, yet georgians added one more?

How even dare I play it as if we know nothing about the history of alphabet? Fuck history, I also do not know it well to advocate to it. But let us try. Let's see it in a perspective.


I knew Ц was the final letter! I knew it! I was looking for it somewhere, maybe in the context of Z
And that numeral set lays into axial symmetry:
а в г д
є ѕ з
и ѳ
ї к л м н ѯ
о п ч/ҁ р с т
ѵ ф х ѱ ѡ ц   Here vowel ѡ reminds y by its position, yet consonant ѱ reminds it by its shape. Yet vowel ѡ does remind consonant w too, so it's alright. The drop in ηθ is very greek, but is it legit? Could it be this:
а в г д
є ѕ з и ѳ
ї к л м н ѯ
о п ч/ҁ р с т
ѵ ф х ѱ ѡ ц
?

Either way,

Now is it three shapes? placed one on the top of another?
or is it a human figure?
с & х like щит и меч?
ноги со шпорами?
ѡ как what? wee?
ѵ is vulva? or is it уд?
ѡ is balls then.
boy am I trippin'

ч/ҁ is the same letter, or rather the same numeral position, it's one or the other,

чр for чресла
Did they add к and such to make shoulders bigger? Could it be a female figure they later modified ot look as if it was not a Goddess but a God (were they also infected by that as&but-phobia, which I got from Акула?

Was а added to dress the head in a helmet?



It's wondrous how the two immediately disagree right after а, only to catch up at і,
Было это, подобно тому как M is for Mile, сокращением? ты в тыща приставка? speculations.. but let's play axial symmetry with glagolythic numerals.
ⰀⰁⰂⰃⰄⰅⰆⰇⰈⰉⰊⰋⰌⰍⰎⰏⰐⰑⰒⰓⰔⰕⰖⰗⰘⰙⰚⰛⰜⰝⰞⰟⰠⰡⰢⰣⰤⰥⰦⰧⰨⰩⰪⰫⰬⰭⰮ
ⰀⰁⰂⰃⰄⰅⰆⰇⰈⰉⰊⰋⰌⰍⰎⰏⰐⰑⰒⰓⰔⰕⰖⰗⰘⰙⰚⰛⰜⰝⰞⰟⰠⰡⰢⰣⰤⰥⰦⰧⰨⰩⰪⰫⰬⰭⰮ
ⰀⰁⰂⰃⰄⰅⰆⰇⰈⰊⰋⰌⰍⰎⰏⰐⰑⰒⰓⰔⰕⰖⰗⰘⰙⰚⰛⰜⰝ

ⰀⰁⰂⰃⰄ
ⰅⰆⰇⰈ
ⰊⰋⰌⰍⰎⰏⰐ
ⰑⰒⰓⰔⰕ
ⰖⰗⰘ
ⰙⰚⰛⰜⰝ

Here's something which goes to the numeral part of this thing:

Малый и Великий счёт подобны Short и Long scales.

Сорок 40, a Ворон 10⁷ или 10⁴⁸? Wut? Why? Is it all even true?

thus here is малый счёт, which is consistent.. but then the великий счёт would be more to the point, since it's not ten, but 1000 numbers in one cycle. I wonder if such large numbers are attested in that system or is it also a reconstruction.


true ~ прав
trve ~ prav
  trv ~ prv
   т  ~  п
     ???
  to ~ по?

to rave ~ по рэйву?
(словно пришелец из будущего слабо понимающий что рэйв это недавнее заимствование)




An old friend contacted:
> Слушай, а нафига тебе бессмертие?
my answer relates to the immortality project sometimes appearing on this scroll, and it occasionally touches on some linguistic ground I felt like sharing with the audience of this thing:


не глюкодром, кайфодром


"каждый занимаясь совместно своими функциями"
не совместно, а каждый своими. Я строю своими руками прототип. Если найдёшь готовых это дело значительно ускорить наймом рабочих и оплатой небольших на самом деле мероприятий (сейчас нужно построить круглую стенку и бетоном её залить, арматуру я лично сварю или свяжу или всё вместе, то это уже 4 человека даже если рабочий один, но лучше двое. т.е. хотя бы 5 человек начинают предприятие способное заработать миллиарды. Но наверное там про команды уровня Стива Возняка и Стива Джобса: теперь они могут не нанимать штат рабочих, а делегировать это дело ии.
В строительстве автоматизация тоже происходит, значит можно и железобетонные купель-капсулы выпуская вдвоём разбогатеть, но третий человек нужен, даже если бы у нас были бабки, то при развитии бизнеса бывают ситуации, когда нужно бабло вливать для масштабирования при резком увеличении спроса.
Снимаю документалку о процессе строительства, если будешь участвовать, тоже снимай.


Why is it here? It was to demonstrate something, I should have started with the thought leaving the boring task of copy-paste for later. Well, maybe you may also find it useful. I don't hold my breath, but that's the way to do it as far as I know. No bounce no play.


Не бьёшься не добьёшься мазохистский русский трагичный way of speak.
Добился звучит так, словно смерть наша цель. Потусторонний мир.
Боже, БG, язык создавали верующие. Благую жизнь вести чтоб в лучший мир войти.

родина~Уродина (русские украинцы, отбросившие U?)
країна = страна. страна У? а россия~родина~страна? не? уросией хочешь её сделать?
see, that is how poor the quality of my work is when emotional contact with other human being is achieved has occured. Why would I even check my mail while high?

  passive         active
is/am/are      does/do
is/am/are       has/have
is/am/are      any_other_verb       The real question here is what's the different between does and has

the difference they make is deciding


Checking a Jackson Crowford's video, he recommends some books I librair in my thing. Even if it causes some repercussions, I feel like I must collect potentially interesting books here, so I mirror them:


vanguard Doublet of avant-garde and vaward.
Va as for in vaward for forward is War! for~fire? firest!!! forest is firest (that firest was a tyo typo)


Господи Боже, прости меня тоже
Господи Бо, прости мене То.
тоже ~ too
то же ~ too yo
      то ~ too (so, I want to say atht that That and Too are cognates?




Philippines is an interesting place. They have pletora of writing systems, and naturally most of them are in eastern order, while few are in western order. And what's about the name? Were they separate islands before centralized government conquered them? And named them after oneself:



A B C D
E  F G H                (here I noticed that some forms of r are similar to h)
 I  J  K L M N       
O P Q R S T          (and R looks like handwritten h)
UVW X Y Z

Seeing that the newfound group is above the very special X and why not, so are they, all are between coronal and velars:
X combines the two, ks
R can be pronounced by as both coronal and uvular
H is way more velar, but is also named as eit and a

So,
A B C D
E  F G H
 I  J  K L M N
O P Q R S T
UVW X Y Z

L belongs in the same group with R, as it is also directly above it.
Also because ll~й, which is closer to h than to a coronal.
Then we have D N S T Z in the fifth group. Those are all directly coronal.
And if L was left with N, then each were long or short for voiced, voiceless or sonors.
That sugests S to be in the second row, where it is in russian. Hm..
It would be in line with english alphabet's alternation of voiced and voiceless.

Δ may sound as ð, but it's never velar. So this is something raw, I'll cook it some more.


неумеешь практикуешься учишься умнеешь умеешь



Even single l between vowels becomes й: Quaestiones convivales [questjones convivejs]



initial w as a denial, similar to un:
(I think I had this idea in my very first notebooks)
well / ill
wrong / right (rung as in rings the bell)
what / that (the ~ ה)
will / ill



devol / loved
loveth / the wall
(people put up walls to protect something, something they love)

debil could be that wiord: demons are damned are бесы






I sugest that those who reformed it to have L at the leftmost part and R at the rightmost part of the axial symmetry (here in the picture above, the lower english latin alphabet) broke the previously existing symmetry they didn't know of, in which M followed I (as all other labials follow vowels (and W was born probably to make another line with Y, which correlates with axial symmetry (thus (according to axial symmetry broke lineal symmetry (above that lower english latin alphabet (irish and italian alphabets do not have JK and some other letters, for example))) reflecting newer state of the alphabet) )



Кроткие наследуют землю.  Потому что кто понаглей те наследуют замки и города.

те как японское te 手 рука: take of te, тащи.

But te is japanese, in chinese it is show (hands show where) and did Ш of that ancient shou?



Цзягувэнь: 甲骨文 jiǎgǔwén  XIV—XI векам до н. э.
Цзиньвэнь: 金文 jīnwén         XIII—IV вв. до н. э.
Сяочжуань: 小篆 xiǎozhuàn    знаки малой печати и малая чжуань  771—256 до н. э.
Лишу: Лишу трад.隸書, упр.隶书      III век до н.э. (цзошу (кит. трад. 佐書, упр. 佐书 zuǒshū))
Синшу: трад.行書, упр.行书 xíngshū; ходовое письмо. III век н.э.
Цаошу: трад.草書, упр.草书, cǎoshū письмо для набросков, травяное письмо.  III век н.э.
Кайшу: трад.楷書, упр.楷书, kǎishū, уставное письмо. III век н.э. (возникло в конце эпохи Восточной Хань (206 г. до н. э. — 220 г. н. э.) в результате смешения поздних форм лишу и цаошу письма. Уставное письмо окончательно сформировалось в эпоху империи Тан (618—907))

But I look into chinese wiki to those terms and oh mama, that is some rabbithule.





Grandam as an obsolete synonym for Grandma makes me think of three mothers as mM𝕸




🤩



M makes sense as russian Мы (We) because M is two people holding hands.




Academia.edu recommended me this article about proximity of Georgian and Armenian alphabets:

I do not see much proximity among them. They were obviously painted by the same hand, and probably that was what confused them into seing the similarity.
His take on protoarmenian is much stronger,
or at least it is much more interesting,
but it yet has to be weighed by ai:


It is not how an abugida would have them.
But then what do I know, letters mutate with time in all directions.
Do they though? Well, it's just somebody else's vision. I have my own, so as I avoided reading too much into other people's work, maybe I should keep to that. Because I have the output flow coming, though I mostly have it only when I'm high. So maybe I should read into it when I'm not.
At least now I know what I have to do when I'm not high, to also not to get distracted.
But then wouldn't it mess with the output flow? Because my stuff is mostly unique, wouldn't it become influenced by them other writers if I read them? It probably will, though I have to take on this as an experiment.
Do they though, though? Look at how far e & ه (according to their position in the alphabet, they're the same letter (isn't position of C & С differ? С is russian S. Are C & S the same letter? ))

I shall give another look to this stuff when I know armenian alphabet at least as good as hebrew.



Думая о том, как гои молятся одному еврейскому богу, тогда как сами евреи молятся богам
(элохим это множественное число)
Аллах это Ал ах?
ах как первое слово восхищения?
ха как противоположное ему. Сатана~Хахаха!
Все язычные от ha?
Все гласные от ah? Хотел сказать про губные, но в слове бог быть может G is the root.



Двуглавый орёл может показывает как голова вертится, типа нет (былинный отказ)



L as half the hundred.
C as circle. O? Q? Crug? CⵔG?



ⱀ ~ p
n ~ п



молорик ~ молотчик
              r~ч (cursive r & cursive ч look exactly the same)



שָׁלוֹם мир (peace) and you may know this word as shalom~hello
עולמ мир (world) and you may know this word for tikum olam (bettering of the world)
notice, how much עו reminds ש and if not that ו, those two words would look even more similar, reflecting the way it is in russian. But שלם is to be whole, which, surprisingly, reminds world more than peace. הושלם / הֻשְׁלַם are two spellings of to be completed. שלם [шелем] to be whole, to be complete, to follow, to agree, to obey. the last meanings are closer to peace.