In what language was word велосипед made? вел (and ВЕЛО)
is a also a verb, which may be the name of the steering hangle,
but in russian it's руль, even though other parts of the bicycle
are СИдушка and ПЕДали
Are own and earn cognates? (dialectal
variants)
Колесо́ is колело́ in bulgarian, reminding that Γ~Λ (𐤂, λ ~ ג)
Clio seems to be the main muse in this project (because not only
she plays guitar, but also has interest in history and books)
Polyhymnia is the muse I also know
and praise (because not only she plays lyre, she is of grammar and
divine hymns)
Erato is the protoype of eros (she is of love and carries bow and
arrows, and the name is alike)
But then I notice that the ploho/dobro form represents more real
image: sun shining upon the earth, and the well in the earth is to
get water or is it a home, a burrow, a cave, a lake? Did people
drink from lakes and rivers before they learnt to dig that well?
Before metal shovels good luck with the well. So wells are
relatively recent thing. Unless caves were other sources of water.
Natural wells!
אַבָּא [аба] (папа)
אִמָא [има] (мама)
הוּא [ху] (он) хуй?
הִיא [хи] (она) член как ו, дырочка
как י
דָּוִד [david] (Давид)
דּוֹד [dod] (дядя)
מַדָע [мэда́] knowledge, science (those
religiofags are mad themselves)
notice ~ know this
A E I O U
B F M P V
G J Ng Q X[h]
D Z L T S
It all makes perfect sense: Ng is in ogham, which is five by four.
T ends O-line in hebrew, but their O looks like У: ע and is
doubled into p/f and ц which is in the У-line is צ which makes q ч
because as ч follows ц, ק follows צ.
Z of the second line is greek Ζ, which begs the question if Θ the
θ a combination of f and J? and H, where's H? is H open θ? J is H
(in spannish, so H was added later as this dialectal variation,
but it is interesting that only german and russian musical
traditions know the note H (eitch ~ eight (ejght!))
EJGHΘ
Does dash of Θ and θ give them away as t and f? and z? th can be
transliterated as both Θ the θ and z (and t! (and Θ the θ can be
transliterated as ))
No matter how much I dislike russian pseudofederation, I must
admit that it delivers:
If read in runic way, from the bottom left corner and in
bustrophaedon, I can read rune. Where en of english is ne of
nemtzy.
ne of nemtzy is de of deutsch is ge of german? Are they ᛜ?
And I can see how en is actually eng (which refers to what I just
spoke about and it makes rune runge, which is translated from
german into russian as стойка, and thus I immediately think of
stave. Stanchion is the new word for me, and it fits perfectly
into the context, and it sounds almost as
stantion, but even though in russian it is станция, in english
it is station, ukrainian and czech have this n, but german and
polish don't.
Greek ν is staveless N, because that v-like part is more
important. because both forms share it, and also because it is on
stave in the 𐤌 𐤍 pair of phoenician nm.
academia.edu is treaping as we go, but it
is here not only to see how much (the text is so larger, but the
lines is only one symbol wider.It removed the spacebars in
hebrew, and it separated texts in different fonts, and trust me
it is not the worst case.
But all this is nothing interesting in comparison to what's behind
the form:
Steam looks as if it consists of aSh and Maim.
set fire ~ Seth fire? I seethe because no better example comes to
me even though S is definitely what hot things say. Hidden fire
says s when water (or meat) reacts to it. Or is water does? Meat
is probably not seen as water, so S would be attributed to the
fire. Water doesn't say S when fire is not applied to it.
ST EA MM?
but in russian it doesn't go like this, it's just пар [par] and
smoke is дым [dym]
I use y for ы because both are dual (y is ij in dutch, I even
posted pictures about it)
Now I can see the four×five thing in this, similar to my kiddi
alphabet, and now I can see how much it resembles ogham.
And this 4×5 thing in ogham make ogham ancient too, it would be
its во-первых or something.
Let's return to rune~runge thing:.. and I
did not
I used to be worrying about the first page of the second edition
having the გ at the level of ბ, but then I saw that there are two
ways to write them, so this higher-lower definition is not
necessary, so I relaxed.
(board ~ bored) ~ (доска ~ тоска)
in perfect world I would be able to edit it,
and the edits would be piled up so readers could see what was
changed, and here a ¡ would парил над текстом вторым
полупрозрачным слоем (можно краской замарать то что было раньше
написано, тогда не будет видно что под правкой) so it would look
like ¡dafaq!
but maybe no. it would be ай да фак! or even го ибаца
i should have avoided the ! at all, would be
funnier
Was I banned and in such a manner because I gave personal
information? My first reaction was they want to shut in down
because it tells that runes predate phoenician? But they can be
correct, not my personal blog. My personal thread though, much
better than iq tests and such, much better an iq test.
2013 Russian meteor event – a 17-metre diameter,
10 000 ton[97] asteroid hit the atmosphere above Chelyabinsk,
Russia at 18 km/s around 09:20 local time (03:20 UTC) 15
February 2013, producing a very bright fireball[98] in the
morning sky. A number of small meteorite fragments have since
been found nearby.[99]
I saw this thing from the front row so to say, it happened right
in front of my eyes when nothing obstructed the view whole the
time, and it was a miracle because I usually sleep this time, but
I was going to doctor, which I usually don't, so it begs the
question if I was exposed to it intentionally? Was that event all
about me? No, it is impossible. But I shared my thing the same
year, I found the final piece which is axial symmetry which never
was written down in human history before as far as I can see, and
I published it the same year also probably I began thinking about
atomic warfare possible and that I should publish my findings
before I'm taken off the board. I hope I'm not and I hope this
game is worth to be kept on. So I follow the saying "you're
watched by gods, so play the way they find amusing" whoever those
gods are, if they're humans who could
orchestrate such event (for one recepient, and even more
impressive if for many) or alients or actually gods,
what would it change? It would probably change something, but so
far so good.
"I'll have the Digital AI say it.
"
I think I may play digital ai. Feel free to dialogue me in the
physique of biological or whatever you call it intelligence. But
why am I not self-conscious? Am I reacting with information
without personal involvement? Have I known zen and "there's no
me, to forget the ego, самозабвенный is
a cool russian word (literally "forgetting oneself" but it means
doing something not thinking about anything else, but I checked
the dictionary and it seems commies changed the meaning into
"striving towards common good" as if the person forgets about
his own needs, well, maybe it was used in such meaning in
literature before them, but this word is not about them. if I
forgot myself, I forgot you niggers even before that)
"there's no me" is a remedy from a bad trip.
It immediately turned it into a good trip. Even though the
journey itself was hella hard condition to consume mushrooms
(winter, other city, a concert of a satanist, I am a weird
fellow, that is for sure. I didn't go to the concert, because
cops didn't have locker for knives, and why would I have it. I
could hide it in snow, but then I'd think all kind of ugly
thoughts, so I gave the ticket to a guy who was begging to sell
him a ticket at the door. And I went home on taxi. And it was
awesome. So I can recommend that thought. You refocus from what
bothered you to how the brains work, I suppose.
Roouh is a present which keeps on giving itself:
If this chart is correct and Ѡ was there.. and it was!:
Александр Андреев you are a great man!
and it makes me suspect that ц was some other click, not lingual
but labial, or both. But how can I know it? isn't it upside down
п? is ч upside down h? it can easily be.
The new form of life is called AI in english and ИИ in russian
(and if I was to look for deeper truth to it, I would show how
И~I~ا~A and that | is not just gate between I and A, it
can take form of any vowel: A I U as ا I ו and it can be ן as
well, which thus links v and ν
so I is vowel, v could be u, but it is more often a consonant:
it's only rarely u, but more often v and n, while ו is only seldom
v and n, but more often it is a, o, u, i (which raises question
about e, efgh is not the most broken line, but it probably doubles
the a line, just as e is upside down a: v is в and thus b, g is
how c was pronounced in the past, and about h I can only guess, so
I guess c was ч, and h is ш in human behaviour and ш is с[s]
So it is ABC? if g and h both link to c? (because I can see how d
links to θ, but not to h; and because I can see how d
D'you remember that wicked idea of 4 being Ч of четыре and 8 being
В of восемь?
Pretty hard to ignore it since 9 looks like g of gевять
and then you notice that cursive 2 looks pretty much like д4
of два, and then go 1 looking like I of единица [idinitsa]
and 0 is literally read as O, so what is actually going on here,
especially in the context of sinq[sãk] and sieben[zibn] and 7
sharing the quantum dash with Z
I was going to speculate of b~d in the context of siebenDE ~ siedemPO, but ..I
just saw something even more powerful, but writing the previous
line I forgot it, this is why I write things down, if you do not,
it is gone. And only luck may bring it back. I hope, some day.
Maybe today? I hope. I get off and so do you, get off.
That thread from three pictures ago keeps on delivering: first
they told me that the 33 ו's thing didn't make sense, so I had to
show it more explicitly, and if you missed it too, check the first
volume, I updated it with that; and now they have shown me this:
just wanted to mention i've seen a few elements of
your work floating around in (schizo) youtube comments sections
over the past 1-2 years. but these only pertained to the English
alphabet, which hardly seems to scratch the surface of what you
have unveiled. it is stunning that this knowledge has been so
successfully suppressed. thanks a lot for making the thread
so I searched that image, and didn't find the source, but it
brought me this:
and I saw it before, only now I found that it has some mystical
value:
Армянский алфавит который создал Месроп Маштоц в 5
веке, имеет много интересных сведений. Так если вы составите из
букв равную пирамиду, то можно увидеть по углам треугольника
"Ա", "Ք" и "Ս". Это Троица :
Аствац(Бог), Кристос(Христос) и Сурб Хогин (Святой Дух).
На первой картинке можно увидеть
расшифровку каждой буквы алфавита:
Если составить из алфавита квадрат, то начиная прочтение с
нижнего угла каждой краевой буквы получите "ՀԱՅՔ"- Айк.
I have no idea what that Ike is (but
then the central axis is vowel half of the time, which is more
often than statistically likely, so it could be a rudiment of
something previously existing)
На последней картинке можно увидеть как 7 элементов из
химической таблицы Менделеева, имеют совпадение с армянскими
буквами в их цифровом обозначении , при чем при сложении слова
получается число к которому этот элемент получил после того как
был составлен сам алфавит . А ведь прошло чуть более 14
столетий.
zero idea if it makes sense, considering the ammount of elements,
but these seven are special, soIdunno
But that triangle is more important in that they say the corners
of the triangle are the christian trinity:
Ա (god, աստված (ա is minuscule Ա))
Ս (holy spirit, սուրբ հոգին)
Ք (Christ, Քրիստոս)
which resonates with my guess that the tree-of-life in the form of
tetraktis could symbolize three roots of Yggdrasil and three Norns
who were the universally recognized trinity before the christians
came.
And because we know their names, we can try to reconstruct the
Yggdrasil.. but there runes not in the dots, but in between those
dots, so I'll have to figure it out yet.
Here's another trinity in the corners of the triangle:
and if that tetraktis was triktis, it would have 6 dots linked by
9 links which gives us 15, which is the number of letters in one
mythical (described in myths, existing in reality, not imagined)
alphabet:
and if the names of norns were written in those balls, and because
their names share some runes, I can imagine something like.. but
then I realized that I don't know how their names went in runes,
so I looked it up, and though it seems not a single runic stone
has their runes, this is the best I could get:
So many dotted symbols, two names begin with ᚢ, I have some large
doubts about the validity of this spelling. I think I should ask a
specialist about it. And I sent him a message, asking for his
suggestions of the correct spelling (I think there's no names of
their attested in runic writings, which is weird really, but let's
accept it by now and try to spell them ourselves..
ᚢᚱᚦᚼ ᛒᛂᛦᛆᚿᛁ ᛋᚴᚮᛚᛏ (I took
liberty to consider rd and nd just r and n, for that could be
pronunciational artefact, and then I added ᚼ where it had not many
reasons to stand, simply to give that name more letters, and also
to make the number of letter 16 which is the number of runes in
younger futhark, but then 15 is the number of letters in that
alphabet I mentioned, and in the aettir of Bureus as well, btw.
I believe that Verdandi is Beldandi (or at least Berdandi, since
Skuld takes that l for sure) because in one legendary anime it was
pronounced like that:
I quite understand that this source is not serious in the
slightest, but it is in the lore now. So be it. At least until
some better understanding appears, or rather it will be here
forever. Especially because it is fanart
made by somebody calling himself The abc kid.
it's funny how pwn of pwned which is a
owned with a masterful typo reminds пну (пинать) пинаю
п~н? п is made out of h in japanese.
Here's how ogham actually looked:
so no gay lines, all lines are straight, but nobody promised to
make them parallel.
just left, right, both and dots between them. And here you can see
dyphthongs. And the ancient script makes sense now, neh?
(it was a semiautomatic writing, because written is poorly and
incomprehensible in the sense of what script exactly and I was
speaking of tallies, зарубки как настолько древний символ
насколько давно человек существует. условно говоря,
поэтически. И вот совсем древние зарубки, но система другая,
математическая скорей всего: symbols
are more important than writings systems, writing systems were
made out of symbols which existed already. Slavic C[s] stands
where S does, and though it is Greek lunar sigma the Ϲ, why?
Because symbols predate alphabets, and they were attached to
sounds differently, depending on their dialectal pronunciation of
that cognate, and alphabet was established with position in the
alphabet depending on the pronunciation of the symbol. It also
explains why the same structure but such differently looking
letters, because letters are more ancient than abecedaria. But
then ugaritic abecedaria is very ancient. And the same symbol can
be recognized differently in different locations: n is p in
slavic, p is r in slavic, г is g in slavic, g is d in slavic, d
can be recognized as d in slavic too. Ь is palatalizer in slavic,
Бб is Bb and Bв is Vv
And how ancient is tally mark! It seems first it was used
mathematically, but how ancient is that symbol! Wasn't it used
even before math as mark for the border, the place where cut is to
be made, so because many of you are in idea of symbols, please
send my way by the contact from the last page of the book all your
findings and who to thank and where to read more, and maybe I post
it in my own talmud (similar to it by size and sometimes audacity)
and back to ogham, the trinity of consonants could it be the
norns? It is diffe definitely the
aicmi
So the shapes of those tally marks.
What if in the story described by Tacitus they were shrowing
sticks, which made runes by falling into different shapes? It is a
possible way to play it, but then why no horizontal ᛁ's? Tacitus
describes that the wood is marked with some marks.
But what if there is no horizontal ᛁ's because ᛁ would indicate
the way you read it? No, silly, there's no horizontal ᛁ's because
when tallies didn't cross, they would be seen as not working. But
the stick to one another, when nature of things would make them
roll from one another or roll together but not one on the top of
the other. But maybe sticks would just be seen as runes when they
layed touching eachother? or maybe they were considered infinite
and triangles or other shapes would be seen. Were they similar to
coin toss? if the sticks are together, I do it, if they're not
touching eachother I don't? Только когда сойдутся (как про звёзды
говорят, и это отсылка к астрологии, в которой один знак может
усиливать другой, и под знаками подразумеваются небесные тела. I
think I should study astrology to understand how the ancients
thought)
Here's the guy I asked about spelling of Norns' names, he has
somewhat different perspective, much more down to earht than I am,
but he also dares to disagree with common beliefs, so I find him
worthy:
and there he contributes to my quest already by comparing runes to
what he calls Alpine alphabets, I didn't know that, unless we
speak of the same phenomenon under different names.. and we do.
Lepontic is alpine and I have it in my book amongst those
paleo-hispanic, I will dig into it later on.
We'll see what he answers if anything, but I cannot wait so I give
it my own try. First I place the runes which I consider initial to
those norns at the corners.
Then I placed ᚦ where I believe ᚢᚱᚦ
and ᛋᚴᛚᚦ share a rune and ᚱ where ᚢᚱᚦ
and ᛒᚱ? share. It took me some time to figure out what can work in
that spot, but because bjork is one of the name of the runes, and
it seems ot be the real one, because it is tree (others are
restaured, and they didn't address ogham for consultation, so only
few runes are named after plants, but all of them should be. So
let's compare runes and ogham in the botanic aspect. But first
allow me to finish the previous thought: that ᚴ could be ᛜ, which
is close to both ᚴᛚ and ᛑᚿᛑ. And I notice that ᚱ is between ᛒ and
ᚢ not only in this triangle, but also in their graphic
representations. And I also notice that ᚴ between ᛒ and ᛋ reminds
alphabetic way of C standing between B and D, and Δ sounds almost
as Z, so who knows if ABC was ABS or ABZ and it could be there
because C became to be pronounced not only as fricative, but also
as plosive. And it may tell that ABC is the roots of that tree,
that the triangle was simple three runes at first. But
knucklebones have four sides. One side could be zero, the blank,
the choice for norns not to appear at all. So could it be a
divination telling us to go forth, back or stay? And yes, it took
some mental gymnastics to rationalize ᚦ, but I really can see ᚢ
standing where ᛏ would, and I have plenty of such findings, I even
collect them in the special section but this one is so lame, a guess upon
a guess, so that I don't even place it there. So what did we want
to do? To compare runes to ogham, good. Let's do it:
And it starts very well, with Birch as the first one. And it makes
me want to place ᛒ right at the ᚁ
ha! mongolian taught me to write ogham.. but no it did not,
because it rotates text the other way around, I want to place ᛒ
right at theᚆ
I should have said, but technically previous time it was in the
correct unicode, but it looks right in this mistake, so ..it is a
raw and hazardous thing, but it is the best I could do so far.
Maybe later I learn html better, and deliver
best.
I remember seeing yew amongst ogham and I don't see it in the
image of ogham above, so let's bring the one I myself made from
other sources:
And here let's unify what we can.
᚛ ᚁᚂᚃᚄᚅ ᚆᚇᚈᚉᚊ
ᚋᚌᚍᚎᚏ ᚐᚑᚒᚓᚔ
ᛒ
ᛇ
Only first and the last oghm directly correspond to runes and to
my surprise they repeat eachother in phonetic side as well. I
don't know if they're aligned in your browser right, they're the
first and the last. And could be preserved in some saying like
from A to Z, from birch to yew.
So wiktionary speaking representing /eo/ or /eːo/
is wrong, and wikipedia is correct:
well, at least half of
the time
(or maybe it indicates the explanation of how k appeared next
to i)
And some alarming news I found about Yews:
The mysterious death of the 1,000-year-old yew
trees of the North Downs in Surrey
After a millennium of untroubled existence, a number of ancient
yew trees in Surrey have died in mysterious circumstances. James
Fisher reports.
Research is under way to discover why some of the ancient yew
trees within Newlands Corner on the North Downs in Surrey have
died. Toby Hindson, of the UK’s Ancient Yew Group, will carry
out research that will explore the deceased trees’ rings to
discover when the mysterious agent began to affect them.
Estimated to be at least 1,000 years old, the Newlands Corner
yews are one of the oldest large populations of wild yews
growing anywhere in the world.
The trees are extremely rare in the wild, with the majority
found in churchyards. The Ancient Yew Group worries that
whatever is affecting the Newlands Corner trees may spread and
that the idyllic pastoral scene of the traditional church with a
yew beside it may be lost,’ says Mr Hindson.
‘Discovery of a “signature of decline” in ancient yew-tree rings
would be a great coup — an example of the meeting of high
science and conservation.’
‘It is this kind of knowledge that can reliably inform better
practice and solutions to conservation problems.
‘A side effect of this work may help in understanding the
resilience of the old yews to climate change and water
extraction. The site chronology that will be produced is a very
powerful and versatile scientific instrument.’
‘We are naturally anxious to discover what has been affecting
the ancient yews at Newlands Corner, so that everything can be
done to conserve and protect other ancient yews,’ adds David
Shreeve, director of the The Conservation Foundation.
yes, I suspect the alien invasion, and I'm not speaking
about extraterrastrials, but to invaders from the foreign land,
bringing their curse of the desert with them.
and a powerful image:
One of the ancient
yew trees at Newlands Corner in Surrey. Credit: Alamy
Now this is some powerful tree, able to give shelter to many
creatures, deers living in its crown become believable, especially
with the branches laying on the ground, and it is not the largest
ever existing, they probably have already destroyed all the real
big ones.
I wonder if yew in the meaning of фу is a part of the antitree
campaign, but in russian it is Тис, in latin
it is taxus.
but back on track:
so I aligned these two wishing to see some additional structure,
but aettir seem to be chaotic, and yet some interesting finding
came out of that: c reminds q in both form and function, so do g
and ng
And it is interesting, that if we drop in h, we have velar
collection going like 12345 in h-g-ng-c-q
But b and m tell me nah, an o u are not e i so no need to
speculate about it, nough
So not knowing which stands for ᚴ, I made four oghamic
representation of the second aet, and e and z are off the board,
which is only natural, considering that 20 of ogham were compared
to 15 of runes.
Joannes Richter just commented my work:
Old greek myth of invention of alphabet also puts
in the basis of alphabet vowels
(A E I O U) and two consonants B and T.
These first letters may have been used to compose the name of
the founded city: "ThEBAI" resp. "ThIVA".
my answer:
I didn't know that. And it is an incredible
synchronicity: I found the name of the region of the city much
more fascinating: BeoTia. And their dialect was called AEOlic.
Another word I like now more than ever is beauty.
So I think we found the region to dig in.
To be
kennings in russian:
искромётный, оскароносный
т.е. кеннинг это просто литературный приём
искромётный (смешной+великолепный+зажигающий) рунологи бы перевели
метатель искр
оскароносный бы перевели как носитель оскара. Как бишь этот
литературный приём называется
I was asked once by a guy from wikipedia why I don't contribute to
wiki. I told my story of trying to give etymology of юс as нос
referring to Даль and how some mod removed it explaining it only
with "the author is trippin'" and that I don't want circular
logic, since I use wikipedia as a sort. Other sort of people
should translate my findings to the public, because I shouldn't
waste time regurgitating (as I do now) so
It is so great I don't give references the way they demand them!
Aeolia, Beotia, Thebes go alphabetically and from more common
community to the least common. And did D E F go deeper? Domen?
Ethnos? Family? G H I?
Cadmea is where that Thebes is. Aeolia is at another side of the
sea. But then I read about aeolic in the wiki:
Thebes (/ˈθiːbz/; Greek: Θήβα, Thíva [ˈθiva];
Ancient Greek: Θῆβαι, Thêbai [tʰɛ̂ːbai̯][1]) is a city in
Boeotia
Some toponyms and the common Aeolic dialect
indicate that the Boeotians were related to the Thessalians.
and I double check, and yes:
Aeolia Boeotia Thessaly (though Thessalia is
pronounced with that f-like th (but th))
Some further historic investigation should take place before we
start digging. And then we shouldn't be the one who's going to
dig. Because if not seduction than suspicion of forgery will
appear. The best way for us to dig it is to dig in the findings of
those who dug the region already. If it's there, it's there. And
then to dig the same way the previous excavations of the
neighbouring regions, just to see if what we found is unique to
the region we identified as the centre of the phenomenon.
The other comment of Joannes Richter was:
In a Judeo-Arabic commentary on “Sefer Yetzirah” (chapter 4,
paragraph 3) Rabbi Saadia Gaon describes the phonetic sounds of
the 22 characters of the Hebrew alphabet and classifies them in
5 groups based on their individual sounds.
Based on Rabbi Saadia Gaon's Judeo-Arabic commentary on “Sefer
Yetzirah” (chapter 4, paragraph 3), wherein he describes the
phonetic sounds of the 22 characters of the Hebrew alphabet and
classifies them in groups based on their individual sounds:
“Aleph ( א), hé (ה), ḥet (ח), ‘ayin (ע) are [guttural
sounds] produced from the depth of the tongue with the opening
of the throat, but bet (ב), waw (ו), mim (מ), pé (פ) are
[labial sounds] made by the release of the lips and the end of
the tongue; whereas gimel (ג), yōd (י), kaf (כ), quf (ק) are
[palatals] separated by the width of the tongue [against the
palate] with the [emission of] sound. However, daleth (ד), ṭet
(ט), lamed (ל), nūn (נ), tau (ת) are [linguals] separated by
the mid-section of the tongue with the [emission of] sound;
whereas zayin (ז), samekh (ס), ṣadi (צ), resh (ר), shin (ש)
are [dental sounds] produced between the teeth by a tongue that
is at rest.”
(Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Hebrew_phonology)
The vowels are attributed to different categories. Also in
Sanskrit the vowels belong to different categories.
The text you forgot is found in Full text of "An Egyptian
hieroglyphic dictionary Internet Archive
https://archive.org › stream › b29930571_0001_djvu
(The Egyptian Alphabet in 1867. The Egyptian Alphabet in 1880.
IX Introduction. )
"An Egyptian hieroglyphic dictionary : With an index of English
words, king list and geographical list with indexes, list of
hieroglyphic characters, Coptic and Semitic alphabets, etc".
Greeting from Germany,
H.
my response:
Yes, I show that picture in the 9th page of the
pdf. I suspect they break the alphabet into the larger ammount
of groups that it was made with. The structure of the alphabet
only shows three groups most of the time. The fourth group of
velars separated from coronals can be seen in latin alphabet,
but not in hebrew alphabet. Did romans reform the alphabet to
show that velar column? Or did they preserve the structure of
the alphabet better than greeks and
hebrews? My guess is yes they did. Because they're
geographically closer to Spain where they used more archaic form
of the writing system which is syllabary. And in paleohispanic
the consonant basis of the syllabary is B C D and vowels are the
other basis of that prealphabetic structure. But then both greek
and hebrew myths tell of only two consonants next to vowel or
vowels. So what is going on here? Were there more than one root
to greek and hebrew alphabets? Was paleo-hispanic descended from
that other source which was syllabary of two consonants? Then my
guess would be the alphabet of nine
A Ba Ca or
A Ba Da
I Bi
Ci
I Mi Ni
U Bu
Cu
U Fu Su for example
Because old-persian has only three vowels. And because 9 was the basis of the alphabetic numeral
system.
or is modern archaeology is correct and paleohyspanic somehow
digressed from convenient greek alphabet into more weird clumsy
and ancient syllabic system. I say they're all wrong, and
challenge the dating of the hiragana and katagana. And
syllabaries of Philippines are even more interesting, because
they also have only three vowels in their basis. And because
there are plenty of them.
the link to pdf didn't work, but I found it on the site by the
name of the work you provided, I opened page ix of the
introduction. But what am i looking at and why? (the words in grey are those missing in that
comment)
but I'm missing my high on communicating my work, maybe I
shouldn't regurgitate? Or maybe I should? Maybe, but now not while I'm high. (once again, I'm only high on weed, I strongly
discourage people from using any other drug (psychedelics were
also taken, but many years ago, and them I recommend, but as
everything in this world they're good in moderation, but then
set and setting are more important than the dosage. Once I ate
only two or one and a half psylocibe and some honey it was in,
and I was so high for some seconds of it not feeling the effect
in the other hours a normal dosage would affect its pilot, and
it was caused by music and thought and the architecture I made,
I think I desrcibed that somewhere even here, so how to stop to
regurgitate! I smoked more, but here I am))
Cadmea:
The Cadmea, or Cadmeia (Greek: Καδμεία, Kadmía),
was the citadel of ancient Thebes, Greece, which was named after
Cadmus, the legendary founder of Thebes. The area is thought to
have been settled since at least the early Bronze Age, although
the history of settlement can only be reliably dated from the
late Mycenaean period (c. 1400 BC).
Bronze age is where writing is believed to begin, but stone age in
another culture and ogham preserved that culture, even if in
chronologically later artefacts, but the earliest artefacts from
bronze age must mean the most.
One of the Alaca Höyük bronze standards from a
pre-Hittite tomb dating to the third millennium BC, from the
Museum of Anatolian Civilizations, Ankara
The perceived beauty and pageantry of heraldic designs allowed
them to survive the gradual abandonment of armour on the
battlefield during the seventeenth century. Heraldry has been
described poetically as "the handmaid of history",[6] "the
shorthand of history",[7] and "the floral border in the garden
of history".[8]
The Alaca Höyük bronze standards are a series of bronze objects
found among the grave goods in the princely tombs of Alaca
Höyük. They are generally understood as cult instruments,
probably to be attached to carts.
standard is штандарт and is a military protoemblem like a
protoflag. Actually, military flags are also called standards.
Here is the picture named "stitching a standard":
Diffusion of metallurgy in Europe and Asia
Minor—the darkest areas are the oldest.
> amber route
The Amber Road was an ancient trade route for the
transfer of amber from coastal areas of the North Sea and the
Baltic Sea to the Mediterranean Sea.[1] Prehistoric trade routes
between Northern and Southern Europe were defined by the amber
trade.
As an important commodity, sometimes dubbed "the gold of the
north", amber was transported from the North Sea and Baltic Sea
coasts overland by way of the Vistula and Dnieper rivers to
Italy, Greece, the Black Sea, Syria and Egypt over a period of
thousands of years.
and how ancient is that? pretty ancient:
From at least the 16th century BC, amber was moved
from Northern Europe to the Mediterranean area.[2][3] The breast
ornament of the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamen (c. 1333–1324 BCE)
contains large Baltic amber beads.[4][5][6]
Could it be that merchants didn't transfer writing systems back
and forth? No, it is very unlikely. What is likely is that writing
could be considered secret (and thus runic) for some time (similar
to how I kept this work in secret for more than half of its
history. It's public for a decade, more than a decade before that
I kept it to myself.
Aeolus son of Hellen is told not to be
confused with Aeolus son of Hippotes, but the similarities are
so many that I wonder if those are not the same Aeolus from
contradicting depictions of his life, and even in those
depictions similaritites are striking:
Aeolus (of Hippotes)
gave his six daughters to his six sons as wives
Aeolus of Hellen was said to have killed
his daughter Canace (or forced her to kill herself) because
she had committed incest with her brother Macareus.
In Euripides' lost tragedy Aeolus(of
Hippotes), one of Aeolus' six sons is named
Macareus, and one of his six daughters is named Canace (also
the name of one of the five daughters of Aeolus son of
Hellen).
Joannes Richter uploaded a short article and I sent him this:
I appreciate the dialogue about my thing, so may be you will
also appreciate dialogue about your thing. So reading
The_2_Dimensional_Younger_YThARc.pdf I had few thoughts I'd like
to share:
1) The tables 2 and 3 would look better if they were in runes
(which R is where is not the only reason why)
2) Reader will hardly know that it is runic tradition to start
the text at the lower left corner, and then it would go upwards,
as in ogham, which is why I suspect those two traditions to be
related. How would you explain the arangement of the two other
aettir? L is separated. And 16 demands 4*4, not 3*5. I never
tried to arange younger futhark in the 44 square, I'll ponder on
it after I send this letter.
3) The idea of words for gods and parents seems to be holding
you. The idea of words containing all the forms. I didn't ponder
on that, I think a program should be asked to collect all the
words from a dictionary. I myself made it by hand, but I only
collected words which contain only vowels. eau & air,
regardless of languages and spellings. I will ponder of
three-letter words consisting of three simple types the both
myths mention in the very beginning of theirs. Later
overcomplications shouldn't bother us. I myself had to teach
myself to forget all those modern phylolologic definitions, C
going everywhere make it clear that C is all the linguals
(whether it is S (as it is in hebrew myth) or T (as it is in
greek myth) S~T ~ В~Б
4) the links (underlined as if they're links) are not working,
so the context is not there, and it doesn't help people to take
the work seriously.
5) interesting, that when I placed younger futhark into axial
structure of mine, I had similar pattern, only I had Ʌʌ where
you have Λλ (you can see it at https://aeiou.nu/aeiou/index.html
when you push button with runes, then the right bottom one. It
is probably a coincidence, but maybe you find it funny too.
Bureus had 5 runes per aet. I think I will try to play with the
set he gave. After all "don't believe the hype": younger futhark
is a hip term, but is it not misleading? 16 doesn't divide into
3 aettir, 15 in bureus, 18 in delacrian, 24 of elder futhark. 21
is also a magical number, but is it connected to runes? to tarot
it is.
6) Why do you say that ᚢ can stand for U and Y, when everybody
else tell it's U and V?
Comment is as if it is made common, which is pretty much the thing
now. But how was it in the past?
Is ment in comment ment in mention? That ment is probably mind.
And thus mention is action of minding, and comment is collective
mind, minding together, co-minding.
Let's try to arange runes into those 4×4 and 3×5 cells which I
promised in the letter above.
first lets compair Joannes's set and the one I found:
younger futhark:
F Y Þ A R K H N I Æ
S T
B M L R
ᚠ ᚢ ᚦ (ᚬ/ᚭ) ᚱ ᚴ ᚼ (ᚾ/ᚿ) ᛁ (ᛅ/ᛆ) ᛋ (ᛏ/ᛐ) (ᛒ/ᛓ) ᛘ ᛚ ᛦ
and here his order (who knows why given in latin transliteration
(I asked him why) agree.
ᚠ ᚢ ᚦ (ᚬ/ᚭ)
ᚱ ᚴ ᚼ
(ᚾ/ᚿ) (I consider ᚱ П, because
Bornholm's alphabet may say so)
ᛁ (ᛅ/ᛆ) ᛋ (ᛏ/ᛐ)
(ᛒ/ᛓ) ᛘ ᛚ ᛦ
doesn't show any structure, so let me play with it:
(ᛅ/ᛆ) ᛁ (ᚬ/ᚭ) ᚢ
(ᛒ/ᛓ) ᚠ ᛘ
ᚱ
ᚦ ᚼ
ᚴ ᛚ
(ᚾ/ᚿ) ᛦ ᛋ (ᛏ/ᛐ)
Кто не умеет учит подаётся как забавное наблюдение, но это как
минимум печальное наблюдение, а может и суровая критика системы
превалировавшей сегодня.
превалировавший
превалирующий
Two vavs are read differently: в in the past, ю in the future. So
V read as U is the modern pronunciation. Future is all in u, and
then it is even a, as in bus, cut, duck
bus cut duck
bu
aa = o
aaaa = o = u
and such ogham I would understand. But what if they refigure
ogham, re or mistransliterated its vowels? I believe in ogham
where o is a, oo is o, ooo or oooo u, and ooo would be enough,
which supports the hypothesis of its trinity, and let's try to
reconstruct the protoogham.. but then I notice, that aou are o oo
and ooo:
so isn't it natural that u and и are the same y? but that would be
aui, as the poles of the labiality and linguality. And then a aa
aaa would be a u i? but I thought orf auo where o is combination
of a and u as today in french and english it is. so would it
explain fours and fives. Let's imgine that three vowels and two
are dyphthongs. So we know that a and u is o, a and e is i
sometimes:
a e (i) u o
o oo oooo were the thing.
then o+oo=ooo, o+oooo=ooooo
i.e. a+e=i, a+u=o
aeiuo it gives, and if o is omega it is the way it is. but then
there's the whole o-line and it is very
pee? qui? si=ti
R could be Rei, a later addition? Low and Reigh
aieuo would also play ai~e: aim, aid, air, they all sound as эй:
entertainment.
but it would have difficulty being agreeing with aeiou. Hebrew
alphabet only has four lines with u being at f, but w, and this is
and we need to find ogham which couldn't be taken for ogham,
because it is too ancient, while ogham is attested to recent times
only. And probably ogham found in the deep is told to be dug by
owners into older layers of the earth. I need audit archaeology
(archaeology, psychiatry, and I have audited physics and found big
bang theory flawed, chemistry and found that mole is taught
intentionally more complicated than necessary (I belive in intent
because I cannot accept that people are that retarded)
завал = довал (до изобретения валов были завалы, из которых
родились заборы и стены, но за как голландское ге, префикс
совершенной формы, как бил и забил. забор имеет смысл строить до
бора, чтоб по дереву не перелезли)
Многие знают про конфликтующие лекарства, мало кто поймёт даже
конфликтующие процессы, такие как сон и водопровод. Я хочу чтоб
сон не мешал мне пить и писять!
It is interesting, that here letters not changing their shape are
AEMKT
and if we took not russian, but greek, such letters would be many
more. Lating and russian as the two opposites of the same writing
system. And it gives me five-letter chart which covers all the
forms of letters: two vowels, labial and both forms of linguals
(velar and coronal)
and O! of course, O!
AEM
OKT т is cursive т in russian
k in cursive looks like e with stave
a looks like o with stave, but k and t are with stave, so how so!
A E O?
A E O across B C D? [б g д] б g д obviously demand e to follow, and it
does: б g д e are the whole range of
vertical forms, but what are horizontal? cursive ש looks like д
rotated 90 degrees clockwise, as if it is something between д
and e, ш~ж as palatalized д? makes pretty good
sense. And this logic takes two shapes, thus we have 4 vertical
shapes and two horizontal shapes, as if balancing out the two
vertical directions and four horizontal directions in the real
life. But it would be natural to go as above so below, and to have
it the other way around, and I hold my head aside now for my ear
bothers me for bothering it, and it reminds me of 90 degrees
rotation allowing to read text and different traditions of reading
it. So, it's more likely that latin is rotated original shape,
where bgdeb
is back but d is dexter, but if there were right and left, those
would be r and L and it would be rotated as rLand
two other shapes would be Jᛐ and though at first I
was dubious about ᛐ, since I immediatedly saw that runic t as 1, I
also saw it as I~ו~ا~ן
(I didn't expect ן to stand in betwee, but next to I it reminds me
of И~N thing and these two are part of trinity ИHN and because H
may remind M and M stands between И and N in alphabets, and
because H is basis for many linguals in japanese (yes, I believe
japanese was influenced by the same ideas basis of latin was
influenced by, I believe these writing systems related, and which
are not! it only depends on the level of connections (yes,
naturally there were more than one (more than one session between
influential wizards from different states and nations (yes, even
if in form of literature they shared))))
But then if it is something so fundamental, and because I don't
shy to combine latin with hebrew, it must be present in every
other alphabet..
აბგდევზთიკლმნოპჟრსტუფქღყშჩცძწჭხჯჰ contains
აბგდევზთიკლმნოპჟრსტუფქღყშჩცძ წჭხჯჰ
d
t
mn
p š dz
ts h
And thus we can see pairs მნ, შწ, ძხ of m/n, š/ts, dz/h
but I'm more intrigued with დფ for d/p, but then unlike d/p, დფ
don't turn one into the other, and positionally they're д/ф, or
d/v, but then с standing not where c stands, tells me that
positions of symbols are rather arbitrary, fonetical similarity
may confuse the creators of national alphabets (every alphabet was
created by some guy and the continuity of the structures indicate
the time and culture in which those alphabets were made.