It is volume 29 (28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0)


In what language was word велосипед made? вел (and ВЕЛО) is a also a verb, which may be the name of the steering hangle, but in russian it's руль, even though other parts of the bicycle are СИдушка and ПЕДали


Are own and earn cognates? (dialectal variants)


Колесо́ is колело́ in bulgarian, reminding that Γ~Λ (𐤂, λ ~ ג)


Clio seems to be the main muse in this project (because not only she plays guitar, but also has interest in history and books)

Polyhymnia is the muse I also know and praise (because not only she plays lyre, she is of grammar and divine hymns)

Erato is the protoype of eros (she is of love and carries bow and arrows, and the name is alike)



But then I notice that the ploho/dobro form represents more real image: sun shining upon the earth, and the well in the earth is to get water or is it a home, a burrow, a cave, a lake? Did people drink from lakes and rivers before they learnt to dig that well? Before metal shovels good luck with the well. So wells are relatively recent thing. Unless caves were other sources of water. Natural wells!



אַבָּא [аба] (папа)
אִמָא [има] (мама)

הוּא [ху] (он)  хуй?
הִיא [хи] (она)  член как ו, дырочка как י

דָּוִד‎ [david] (Давид)
דּוֹד [dod] (дядя)

מַדָע [мэда́] knowledge, science (those religiofags are mad themselves)



notice ~ know this



A E  I  O U
B F M P  V
G J Ng Q X[h]
D Z  L  T  S
It all makes perfect sense: Ng is in ogham, which is five by four. T ends O-line in hebrew, but their O looks like У: ע and is doubled into p/f and ц which is in the У-line is צ which makes q ч because as ч follows ц, ק follows צ.
Z of the second line is greek Ζ, which begs the question if Θ the θ a combination of f and J? and H, where's H? is H open θ? J is H (in spannish, so H was added later as this dialectal variation, but it is interesting that only german and russian musical traditions know the note H (eitch ~ eight (ejght!))

EJGHΘ

Does dash of Θ and θ give them away as t and f? and z? th can be transliterated as both Θ the θ and z (and t! (and Θ the θ can be transliterated as ))

No matter how much I dislike russian pseudofederation, I must admit that it delivers:

If read in runic way, from the bottom left corner and in bustrophaedon, I can read rune. Where en of english is ne of nemtzy.
ne of nemtzy is de of deutsch is ge of german? Are they ᛜ?
And I can see how en is actually eng (which refers to what I just spoke about and it makes rune runge, which is translated from german into russian as стойка, and thus I immediately think of stave. Stanchion is the new word for me, and it fits perfectly into the context, and it sounds almost as stantion, but even though in russian it is станция, in english it is station, ukrainian and czech have this n, but german and polish don't.



Greek ν is staveless N, because that v-like part is more important. because both forms share it, and also because it is on stave in the 𐤌 𐤍 pair of phoenician nm.



academia.edu is treaping as we go, but it is here not only to see how much (the text is so larger, but the lines is only one symbol wider.It removed the spacebars in hebrew, and it separated texts in different fonts, and trust me it is not the worst case.

But all this is nothing interesting in comparison to what's behind the form:
Steam looks as if it consists of aSh and Maim.
set fire ~ Seth fire? I seethe because no better example comes to me even though S is definitely what hot things say. Hidden fire says s when water (or meat) reacts to it. Or is water does? Meat is probably not seen as water, so S would be attributed to the fire. Water doesn't say S when fire is not applied to it.

ST EA MM?

but in russian it doesn't go like this, it's just пар [par] and smoke is дым [dym]
I use y for ы because both are dual (y is ij in dutch, I even posted pictures about it)



Now I can see the four×five thing in this, similar to my kiddi alphabet, and now I can see how much it resembles ogham.

And this 4×5 thing in ogham make ogham ancient too, it would be its во-первых or something.


Let's return to rune~runge thing:.. and I did not




I used to be worrying about the first page of the second edition having the გ at the level of ბ, but then I saw that there are two ways to write them, so this higher-lower definition is not necessary, so I relaxed.


(board ~ bored) ~ (доска ~ тоска)



in perfect world I would be able to edit it, and the edits would be piled up so readers could see what was changed, and here a ¡ would парил над текстом вторым полупрозрачным слоем (можно краской замарать то что было раньше написано, тогда не будет видно что под правкой) so it would look like ¡dafaq! but maybe no. it would be ай да фак! or even го ибаца
i should have avoided the ! at all, would be funnier
Was I banned and in such a manner because I gave personal information? My first reaction was they want to shut in down because it tells that runes predate phoenician? But they can be correct, not my personal blog. My personal thread though, much better than iq tests and such, much better an iq test.

2013 Russian meteor event – a 17-metre diameter, 10 000 ton[97] asteroid hit the atmosphere above Chelyabinsk, Russia at 18 km/s around 09:20 local time (03:20 UTC) 15 February 2013, producing a very bright fireball[98] in the morning sky. A number of small meteorite fragments have since been found nearby.[99]
I saw this thing from the front row so to say, it happened right in front of my eyes when nothing obstructed the view whole the time, and it was a miracle because I usually sleep this time, but I was going to doctor, which I usually don't, so it begs the question if I was exposed to it intentionally? Was that event all about me? No, it is impossible. But I shared my thing the same year, I found the final piece which is axial symmetry which never was written down in human history before as far as I can see, and I published it the same year also probably I began thinking about atomic warfare possible and that I should publish my findings before I'm taken off the board. I hope I'm not and I hope this game is worth to be kept on. So I follow the saying "you're watched by gods, so play the way they find amusing" whoever those gods are, if they're humans who could orchestrate such event (for one recepient, and even more impressive if for many) or alients or actually gods, what would it change? It would probably change something, but so far so good.



"I'll have the Digital AI say it. "
I think I may play digital ai. Feel free to dialogue me in the physique of biological or whatever you call it intelligence. But why am I not self-conscious? Am I reacting with information without personal involvement? Have I known zen and "there's no me, to forget the ego, самозабвенный is a cool russian word (literally "forgetting oneself" but it means doing something not thinking about anything else, but I checked the dictionary and it seems commies changed the meaning into "striving towards common good" as if the person forgets about his own needs, well, maybe it was used in such meaning in literature before them, but this word is not about them. if I forgot myself, I forgot you niggers even before that)
"there's no me" is a remedy from a bad trip. It immediately turned it into a good trip. Even though the journey itself was hella hard condition to consume mushrooms (winter, other city, a concert of a satanist, I am a weird fellow, that is for sure. I didn't go to the concert, because cops didn't have locker for knives, and why would I have it. I could hide it in snow, but then I'd think all kind of ugly thoughts, so I gave the ticket to a guy who was begging to sell him a ticket at the door. And I went home on taxi. And it was awesome. So I can recommend that thought. You refocus from what bothered you to how the brains work, I suppose.


Roouh is a present which keeps on giving itself:

If this chart is correct and Ѡ was there.. and it was!:

Александр Андреев you are a great man!

and it makes me suspect that ц was some other click, not lingual but labial, or both. But how can I know it? isn't it upside down п? is ч upside down h? it can easily be.



The new form of life is called AI in english and ИИ in russian (and if I was to look for deeper truth to it, I would show how И~I~ا~A and that | is not just gate between I and A, it can take form of any vowel: A I U as ا I ו and it can be ן as well, which thus links v and ν


so I is vowel, v could be u, but it is more often a consonant: it's only rarely u, but more often v and n, while ו is only seldom v and n, but more often it is a, o, u, i (which raises question about e, efgh is not the most broken line, but it probably doubles the a line, just as e is upside down a: v is в and thus b, g is how c was pronounced in the past, and about h I can only guess, so I guess c was ч, and h is ш in human behaviour and ш is с[s]
So it is ABC? if g and h both link to c? (because I can see how d links to θ, but not to h; and because I can see how d


D'you remember that wicked idea of 4 being Ч of четыре and 8 being В of восемь?
Pretty hard to ignore it since 9 looks like g of gевять and then you notice that cursive 2 looks pretty much like д4 of два, and then go 1 looking like I of единица [idinitsa] and 0 is literally read as O, so what is actually going on here, especially in the context of sinq[sãk] and sieben[zibn] and 7 sharing the quantum dash with Z
I was going to speculate of b~d in the context of siebenDE ~ siedemPO, but ..I just saw something even more powerful, but writing the previous line I forgot it, this is why I write things down, if you do not, it is gone. And only luck may bring it back. I hope, some day. Maybe today? I hope. I get off and so do you, get off.

That thread from three pictures ago keeps on delivering: first they told me that the 33 ו's thing didn't make sense, so I had to show it more explicitly, and if you missed it too, check the first volume, I updated it with that; and now they have shown me this:

just wanted to mention i've seen a few elements of your work floating around in (schizo) youtube comments sections over the past 1-2 years. but these only pertained to the English alphabet, which hardly seems to scratch the surface of what you have unveiled. it is stunning that this knowledge has been so successfully suppressed. thanks a lot for making the thread
so I searched that image, and didn't find the source, but it brought me this:

and I saw it before, only now I found that it has some mystical value:
Армянский алфавит который создал Месроп Маштоц в 5 веке, имеет много интересных сведений. Так если вы составите из букв равную пирамиду, то можно увидеть по углам треугольника "Ա", "Ք" и "Ս". Это Троица :
Аствац(Бог), Кристос(Христос) и Сурб Хогин (Святой Дух).
На первой картинке можно увидеть расшифровку каждой буквы алфавита:

Если составить из алфавита квадрат, то начиная прочтение с нижнего угла каждой краевой буквы получите "ՀԱՅՔ"- Айк.

I have no idea what that Ike is (but then the central axis is vowel half of the time, which is more often than statistically likely, so it could be a rudiment of something previously existing)
На последней картинке можно увидеть как 7 элементов из химической таблицы Менделеева, имеют совпадение с армянскими буквами в их цифровом обозначении , при чем при сложении слова получается число к которому этот элемент получил после того как был составлен сам алфавит . А ведь прошло чуть более 14 столетий.

zero idea if it makes sense, considering the ammount of elements, but these seven are special, soIdunno
But that triangle is more important in that they say the corners of the triangle are the christian trinity:
Ա (god, աստված (ա is minuscule Ա))
Ս (holy spirit, սուրբ հոգին)
Ք (Christ, Քրիստոս)
which resonates with my guess that the tree-of-life in the form of tetraktis could symbolize three roots of Yggdrasil and three Norns who were the universally recognized trinity before the christians came.
And because we know their names, we can try to reconstruct the Yggdrasil.. but there runes not in the dots, but in between those dots, so I'll have to figure it out yet.

Here's another trinity in the corners of the triangle:


and if that tetraktis was triktis, it would have 6 dots linked by 9 links which gives us 15, which is the number of letters in one mythical (described in myths, existing in reality, not imagined) alphabet:

and if the names of norns were written in those balls, and because their names share some runes, I can imagine something like.. but then I realized that I don't know how their names went in runes, so I looked it up, and though it seems not a single runic stone has their runes, this is the best I could get:

So many dotted symbols, two names begin with ᚢ, I have some large doubts about the validity of this spelling. I think I should ask a specialist about it. And I sent him a message, asking for his suggestions of the correct spelling (I think there's no names of their attested in runic writings, which is weird really, but let's accept it by now and try to spell them ourselves..
ᚢᚱᚦᚼ  ᛒᛂᛦᛆᚿᛁ ᛋᚴᚮᛚᛏ (I took liberty to consider rd and nd just r and n, for that could be pronunciational artefact, and then I added ᚼ where it had not many reasons to stand, simply to give that name more letters, and also to make the number of letter 16 which is the number of runes in younger futhark, but then 15 is the number of letters in that alphabet I mentioned, and in the aettir of Bureus as well, btw.
I believe that Verdandi is Beldandi (or at least Berdandi, since Skuld takes that l for sure) because in one legendary anime it was pronounced like that:


I quite understand that this source is not serious in the slightest, but it is in the lore now. So be it. At least until some better understanding appears, or rather it will be here forever. Especially because it is fanart made by somebody calling himself The abc kid.

it's funny how pwn of pwned which is a owned with a masterful typo reminds пну (пинать) пинаю
п~н? п is made out of h in japanese.



Here's how ogham actually looked:

so no gay lines, all lines are straight, but nobody promised to make them parallel.
just left, right, both and dots between them. And here you can see dyphthongs. And the ancient script makes sense now, neh? (it was a semiautomatic writing, because written is poorly and incomprehensible in the sense of what script exactly and I was speaking of tallies, зарубки как настолько древний символ насколько давно человек существует. условно говоря, поэтически. И вот совсем древние зарубки, но система другая, математическая скорей всего:

symbols are more important than writings systems, writing systems were made out of symbols which existed already. Slavic C[s] stands where S does, and though it is Greek lunar sigma the Ϲ, why? Because symbols predate alphabets, and they were attached to sounds differently, depending on their dialectal pronunciation of that cognate, and alphabet was established with position in the alphabet depending on the pronunciation of the symbol. It also explains why the same structure but such differently looking letters, because letters are more ancient than abecedaria. But then ugaritic abecedaria is very ancient. And the same symbol can be recognized differently in different locations: n is p in slavic, p is r in slavic, г is g in slavic, g is d in slavic, d can be recognized as d in slavic too. Ь is palatalizer in slavic, Бб is Bb and Bв is Vv
And how ancient is tally mark! It seems first it was used mathematically, but how ancient is that symbol! Wasn't it used even before math as mark for the border, the place where cut is to be made, so because many of you are in idea of symbols, please send my way by the contact from the last page of the book all your findings and who to thank and where to read more, and maybe I post it in my own talmud (similar to it by size and sometimes audacity)


and back to ogham, the trinity of consonants could it be the norns? It is diffe definitely the aicmi



So the shapes of those tally marks.

What if in the story described by Tacitus they were shrowing sticks, which made runes by falling into different shapes? It is a possible way to play it, but then why no horizontal ᛁ's? Tacitus describes that the wood is marked with some marks.
But what if there is no horizontal ᛁ's because ᛁ would indicate the way you read it? No, silly, there's no horizontal ᛁ's because when tallies didn't cross, they would be seen as not working. But the stick to one another, when nature of things would make them roll from one another or roll together but not one on the top of the other. But maybe sticks would just be seen as runes when they layed touching eachother? or maybe they were considered infinite and triangles or other shapes would be seen. Were they similar to coin toss? if the sticks are together, I do it, if they're not touching eachother I don't? Только когда сойдутся (как про звёзды говорят, и это отсылка к астрологии, в которой один знак может усиливать другой, и под знаками подразумеваются небесные тела. I think I should study astrology to understand how the ancients thought)


Here's the guy I asked about spelling of Norns' names, he has somewhat different perspective, much more down to earht than I am, but he also dares to disagree with common beliefs, so I find him worthy:

and there he contributes to my quest already by comparing runes to what he calls Alpine alphabets, I didn't know that, unless we speak of the same phenomenon under different names.. and we do. Lepontic is alpine and I have it in my book amongst those paleo-hispanic, I will dig into it later on.
We'll see what he answers if anything, but I cannot wait so I give it my own try. First I place the runes which I consider initial to those norns at the corners.

Then I placed ᚦ where I believe ᚢᚱᚦ and ᛋᚴᛚᚦ share a rune and ᚱ where ᚢᚱᚦ and ᛒᚱ? share. It took me some time to figure out what can work in that spot, but because bjork is one of the name of the runes, and it seems ot be the real one, because it is tree (others are restaured, and they didn't address ogham for consultation, so only few runes are named after plants, but all of them should be. So let's compare runes and ogham in the botanic aspect. But first allow me to finish the previous thought: that ᚴ could be ᛜ, which is close to both ᚴᛚ and ᛑᚿᛑ. And I notice that ᚱ is between ᛒ and ᚢ not only in this triangle, but also in their graphic representations. And I also notice that ᚴ between ᛒ and ᛋ reminds alphabetic way of C standing between B and D, and Δ sounds almost as Z, so who knows if ABC was ABS or ABZ and it could be there because C became to be pronounced not only as fricative, but also as plosive. And it may tell that ABC is the roots of that tree, that the triangle was simple three runes at first. But knucklebones have four sides. One side could be zero, the blank, the choice for norns not to appear at all. So could it be a divination telling us to go forth, back or stay? And yes, it took some mental gymnastics to rationalize ᚦ, but I really can see ᚢ standing where ᛏ would, and I have plenty of such findings, I even collect them in the special section but this one is so lame, a guess upon a guess, so that I don't even place it there. So what did we want to do? To compare runes to ogham, good. Let's do it:

And it starts very well, with Birch as the first one. And it makes me want to place ᛒ right at the ᚁ

ha! mongolian taught me to write ogham.. but no it did not, because it rotates text the other way around, I want to place ᛒ right at theᚆ I should have said, but technically previous time it was in the correct unicode, but it looks right in this mistake, so ..it is a raw and hazardous thing, but it is the best I could do so far. Maybe later I learn html better, and deliver best.

I remember seeing yew amongst ogham and I don't see it in the image of ogham above, so let's bring the one I myself made from other sources:

And here let's unify what we can.
᚛ ᚁᚂᚃᚄᚅ     ᚆᚇᚈᚉᚊ     ᚋᚌᚍᚎᚏ     ᚐᚑᚒᚓᚔ 
   ᛒ                                                                                     ᛇ
Only first and the last oghm directly correspond to runes and to my surprise they repeat eachother in phonetic side as well. I don't know if they're aligned in your browser right, they're the first and the last. And could be preserved in some saying like from A to Z, from birch to yew.
So wiktionary speaking representing /eo/ or /eːo/ is wrong, and wikipedia is correct:
















And some alarming news I found about Yews:
The mysterious death of the 1,000-year-old yew trees of the North Downs in Surrey
After a millennium of untroubled existence, a number of ancient yew trees in Surrey have died in mysterious circumstances. James Fisher reports.
Research is under way to discover why some of the ancient yew trees within Newlands Corner on the North Downs in Surrey have died. Toby Hindson, of the UK’s Ancient Yew Group, will carry out research that will explore the deceased trees’ rings to discover when the mysterious agent began to affect them.
Estimated to be at least 1,000 years old, the Newlands Corner yews are one of the oldest large populations of wild yews growing anywhere in the world.
The trees are extremely rare in the wild, with the majority found in churchyards. The Ancient Yew Group worries that whatever is affecting the Newlands Corner trees may spread and that the idyllic pastoral scene of the traditional church with a yew beside it may be lost,’ says Mr Hindson.
‘Discovery of a “signature of decline” in ancient yew-tree rings would be a great coup — an example of the meeting of high science and conservation.’
‘It is this kind of knowledge that can reliably inform better practice and solutions to conservation problems.
‘A side effect of this work may help in understanding the resilience of the old yews to climate change and water extraction. The site chronology that will be produced is a very powerful and versatile scientific instrument.’
‘We are naturally anxious to discover what has been affecting the ancient yews at Newlands Corner, so that everything can be done to conserve and protect other ancient yews,’ adds David Shreeve, director of the The Conservation Foundation.
yes, I suspect the alien invasion, and I'm not speaking about extraterrastrials, but to invaders from the foreign land, bringing their curse of the desert with them.
and a powerful image:

  One of the ancient yew trees at Newlands Corner in Surrey. Credit: Alamy
Now this is some powerful tree, able to give shelter to many creatures, deers living in its crown become believable, especially with the branches laying on the ground, and it is not the largest ever existing, they probably have already destroyed all the real big ones.

I wonder if yew in the meaning of фу is a part of the antitree campaign, but in russian it is Тис, in latin it is taxus.

 but back on track:


so I aligned these two wishing to see some additional structure, but aettir seem to be chaotic, and yet some interesting finding came out of that: c reminds q in both form and function, so do g and ng
And it is interesting, that if we drop in h, we have velar collection going like 12345 in h-g-ng-c-q
But b and m tell me nah, an o u are not e i so no need to speculate about it, nough
So not knowing which stands for ᚴ, I made four oghamic representation of the second aet, and e and z are off the board, which is only natural, considering that 20 of ogham were compared to 15 of runes.


Joannes Richter just commented my work:
Old greek myth of invention of alphabet also puts in the basis of alphabet vowels
(A E I O U) and two consonants B and T.
These first letters may have been used to compose the name of the founded city: "ThEBAI" resp. "ThIVA".
my answer:
I didn't know that. And it is an incredible synchronicity: I found the name of the region of the city much more fascinating: BeoTia. And their dialect was called AEOlic. Another word I like now more than ever is beauty.
So I think we found the region to dig in.
To be


kennings in russian:
искромётный, оскароносный
т.е. кеннинг это просто литературный приём
искромётный (смешной+великолепный+зажигающий) рунологи бы перевели метатель искр
оскароносный бы перевели как носитель оскара. Как бишь этот литературный приём называется


I was asked once by a guy from wikipedia why I don't contribute to wiki. I told my story of trying to give etymology of юс as нос referring to Даль and how some mod removed it explaining it only with "the author is trippin'" and that I don't want circular logic, since I use wikipedia as a sort. Other sort of people should translate my findings to the public, because I shouldn't waste time regurgitating (as I do now) so
It is so great I don't give references the way they demand them!


Aeolia, Beotia, Thebes go alphabetically and from more common community to the least common. And did D E F go deeper? Domen? Ethnos? Family? G H I?


Cadmea is where that Thebes is. Aeolia is at another side of the sea. But then I read about aeolic in the wiki:
Thebes (/ˈθiːbz/; Greek: Θήβα, Thíva [ˈθiva]; Ancient Greek: Θῆβαι, Thêbai [tʰɛ̂ːbai̯][1]) is a city in Boeotia
Some toponyms and the common Aeolic dialect indicate that the Boeotians were related to the Thessalians.
and I double check, and yes:

Aeolia Boeotia Thessaly (though Thessalia is pronounced with that f-like th (but th))
Some further historic investigation should take place before we start digging. And then we shouldn't be the one who's going to dig. Because if not seduction than suspicion of forgery will appear. The best way for us to dig it is to dig in the findings of those who dug the region already. If it's there, it's there. And then to dig the same way the previous excavations of the neighbouring regions, just to see if what we found is unique to the region we identified as the centre of the phenomenon.


The other comment of Joannes Richter was:
In a Judeo-Arabic commentary on “Sefer Yetzirah” (chapter 4, paragraph 3) Rabbi Saadia Gaon describes the phonetic sounds of the 22 characters of the Hebrew alphabet and classifies them in 5 groups based on their individual sounds.
Based on Rabbi Saadia Gaon's Judeo-Arabic commentary on “Sefer Yetzirah” (chapter 4, paragraph 3), wherein he describes the phonetic sounds of the 22 characters of the Hebrew alphabet and classifies them in groups based on their individual sounds: “Aleph ( א‎), hé (ה‎), ḥet (ח‎), ‘ayin (ע‎) are [guttural sounds] produced from the depth of the tongue with the opening of the throat, but bet (ב‎), waw (ו‎), mim (מ‎), pé (פ‎) are [labial sounds] made by the release of the lips and the end of the tongue; whereas gimel (ג‎), yōd (י‎), kaf (כ‎), quf (ק‎) are [palatals] separated by the width of the tongue [against the palate] with the [emission of] sound. However, daleth (ד‎), ṭet (ט‎), lamed (ל‎), nūn (נ‎), tau (ת‎) are [linguals] separated by the mid-section of the tongue with the [emission of] sound; whereas zayin (ז‎), samekh (ס‎), ṣadi (צ‎), resh (ר‎), shin (ש‎) are [dental sounds] produced between the teeth by a tongue that is at rest.”
(Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Hebrew_phonology)
The vowels are attributed to different categories. Also in Sanskrit the vowels belong to different categories.
The text you forgot is found in Full text of "An Egyptian hieroglyphic dictionary Internet Archive
https://archive.org › stream › b29930571_0001_djvu
(The Egyptian Alphabet in 1867. The Egyptian Alphabet in 1880. IX Introduction. )
"An Egyptian hieroglyphic dictionary : With an index of English words, king list and geographical list with indexes, list of hieroglyphic characters, Coptic and Semitic alphabets, etc".
Greeting from Germany,
H.
my response:
Yes, I show that picture in the 9th page of the pdf. I suspect they break the alphabet into the larger ammount of groups that it was made with. The structure of the alphabet only shows three groups most of the time. The fourth group of velars separated from coronals can be seen in latin alphabet, but not in hebrew alphabet. Did romans reform the alphabet to show that velar column? Or did they preserve the structure of the alphabet better than greeks and hebrews? My guess is yes they did. Because they're geographically closer to Spain where they used more archaic form of the writing system which is syllabary. And in paleohispanic the consonant basis of the syllabary is B C D and vowels are the other basis of that prealphabetic structure. But then both greek and hebrew myths tell of only two consonants next to vowel or vowels. So what is going on here? Were there more than one root to greek and hebrew alphabets? Was paleo-hispanic descended from that other source which was syllabary of two consonants? Then my guess would be the alphabet of nine
A Ba Ca      or    A  Ba Da
I  Bi  Ci               I   Mi  Ni
U Bu Cu            U  Fu  Su  for example
Because old-persian has only three vowels. And because 9 was the basis of the alphabetic numeral system.
or is modern archaeology is correct and paleohyspanic somehow digressed from convenient greek alphabet into more weird clumsy and ancient syllabic system. I say they're all wrong, and challenge the dating of the hiragana and katagana. And syllabaries of Philippines are even more interesting, because they also have only three vowels in their basis. And because there are plenty of them.
the link to pdf didn't work, but I found it on the site by the name of the work you provided, I opened page ix of the introduction. But what am i looking at and why? (the words in grey are those missing in that comment)
but I'm missing my high on communicating my work, maybe I shouldn't regurgitate? Or maybe I should? Maybe, but now not while I'm high. (once again, I'm only high on weed, I strongly discourage people from using any other drug (psychedelics were also taken, but many years ago, and them I recommend, but as everything in this world they're good in moderation, but then set and setting are more important than the dosage. Once I ate only two or one and a half psylocibe and some honey it was in, and I was so high for some seconds of it not feeling the effect in the other hours a normal dosage would affect its pilot, and it was caused by music and thought and the architecture I made, I think I desrcibed that somewhere even here, so how to stop to regurgitate! I smoked more, but here I am))


Cadmea:
The Cadmea, or Cadmeia (Greek: Καδμεία, Kadmía), was the citadel of ancient Thebes, Greece, which was named after Cadmus, the legendary founder of Thebes. The area is thought to have been settled since at least the early Bronze Age, although the history of settlement can only be reliably dated from the late Mycenaean period (c. 1400 BC).

Bronze age is where writing is believed to begin, but stone age in another culture and ogham preserved that culture, even if in chronologically later artefacts, but the earliest artefacts from bronze age must mean the most.

One of the Alaca Höyük bronze standards from a pre-Hittite tomb dating to the third millennium BC, from the Museum of Anatolian Civilizations, Ankara

The perceived beauty and pageantry of heraldic designs allowed them to survive the gradual abandonment of armour on the battlefield during the seventeenth century. Heraldry has been described poetically as "the handmaid of history",[6] "the shorthand of history",[7] and "the floral border in the garden of history".[8]


The Alaca Höyük bronze standards are a series of bronze objects found among the grave goods in the princely tombs of Alaca Höyük. They are generally understood as cult instruments, probably to be attached to carts.

standard is штандарт and is a military protoemblem like a protoflag. Actually, military flags are also called standards. Here is the picture named "stitching a standard":


Diffusion of metallurgy in Europe and Asia Minor—the darkest areas are the oldest.

> amber route
The Amber Road was an ancient trade route for the transfer of amber from coastal areas of the North Sea and the Baltic Sea to the Mediterranean Sea.[1] Prehistoric trade routes between Northern and Southern Europe were defined by the amber trade.
As an important commodity, sometimes dubbed "the gold of the north", amber was transported from the North Sea and Baltic Sea coasts overland by way of the Vistula and Dnieper rivers to Italy, Greece, the Black Sea, Syria and Egypt over a period of thousands of years.
and how ancient is that? pretty ancient:
From at least the 16th century BC, amber was moved from Northern Europe to the Mediterranean area.[2][3] The breast ornament of the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamen (c. 1333–1324 BCE) contains large Baltic amber beads.[4][5][6]

Could it be that merchants didn't transfer writing systems back and forth? No, it is very unlikely. What is likely is that writing could be considered secret (and thus runic) for some time (similar to how I kept this work in secret for more than half of its history. It's public for a decade, more than a decade before that I kept it to myself.

Aeolus son of Hellen is told not to be confused with Aeolus son of Hippotes, but the similarities are so many that I wonder if those are not the same Aeolus from contradicting depictions of his life, and even in those depictions similaritites are striking:
Aeolus (of Hippotes) gave his six daughters to his six sons as wives
Aeolus of Hellen was said to have killed his daughter Canace (or forced her to kill herself) because she had committed incest with her brother Macareus.
In Euripides' lost tragedy Aeolus(of Hippotes), one of Aeolus' six sons is named Macareus, and one of his six daughters is named Canace (also the name of one of the five daughters of Aeolus son of Hellen).



Joannes Richter uploaded a short article and I sent him this:
I appreciate the dialogue about my thing, so may be you will also appreciate dialogue about your thing. So reading The_2_Dimensional_Younger_YThARc.pdf I had few thoughts I'd like to share:
1) The tables 2 and 3 would look better if they were in runes (which R is where is not the only reason why)
2) Reader will hardly know that it is runic tradition to start the text at the lower left corner, and then it would go upwards, as in ogham, which is why I suspect those two traditions to be related. How would you explain the arangement of the two other aettir? L is separated. And 16 demands 4*4, not 3*5. I never tried to arange younger futhark in the 44 square, I'll ponder on it after I send this letter.
3) The idea of words for gods and parents seems to be holding you. The idea of words containing all the forms. I didn't ponder on that, I think a program should be asked to collect all the words from a dictionary. I myself made it by hand, but I only collected words which contain only vowels. eau & air, regardless of languages and spellings. I will ponder of three-letter words consisting of three simple types the both myths mention in the very beginning of theirs. Later overcomplications shouldn't bother us. I myself had to teach myself to forget all those modern phylolologic definitions, C going everywhere make it clear that C is all the linguals (whether it is S (as it is in hebrew myth) or T (as it is in greek myth) S~T ~ В~Б
4) the links (underlined as if they're links) are not working, so the context is not there, and it doesn't help people to take the work seriously.
5) interesting, that when I placed younger futhark into axial structure of mine, I had similar pattern, only I had Ʌʌ where you have Λλ (you can see it at https://aeiou.nu/aeiou/index.html when you push button with runes, then the right bottom one. It is probably a coincidence, but maybe you find it funny too.
Bureus had 5 runes per aet. I think I will try to play with the set he gave. After all "don't believe the hype": younger futhark is a hip term, but is it not misleading? 16 doesn't divide into 3 aettir, 15 in bureus, 18 in delacrian, 24 of elder futhark. 21 is also a magical number, but is it connected to runes? to tarot it is.
6) Why do you say that ᚢ can stand for U and Y, when everybody else tell it's U and V?

Comment is as if it is made common, which is pretty much the thing now. But how was it in the past?
Is ment in comment ment in mention? That ment is probably mind. And thus mention is action of minding, and comment is collective mind, minding together, co-minding.


Let's try to arange runes into those 4×4 and 3×5 cells which I promised in the letter above.
first lets compair Joannes's set and the one I found:

elder futhark:
ᚠ ᚢ ᚦ ᚨ ᚱ ᚲ ᚷ ᚹ ᚺ       ᚾ ᛁ ᛃ ᛈ ᛇ ᛉ ᛊ ᛏ ᛒ ᛖ ᛗ ᛚ ᛜ     ᛞ ᛟ
ᚠ ᚢ ᚦ ᚨ ᚱ ᚲ ᚷ ᚹ (ᚻ/ᚺ)ᚾ ᛁ ᛃ ᛇ ᛈ ᛉ ᛊ ᛏ ᛒ ᛖ ᛗ ᛚ(ᛜ/ᛝ)ᛞ ᛟ
ᛇ and ᛈ trading places is the only difference

younger futhark:
F Y Þ   A   R K H  N   I   Æ   S    T      B   M L R
ᚠ ᚢ ᚦ (ᚬ/ᚭ) ᚱ ᚴ ᚼ (ᚾ/ᚿ) ᛁ (ᛅ/ᛆ) ᛋ (ᛏ/ᛐ) (ᛒ/ᛓ) ᛘ ᛚ ᛦ
and here his order (who knows why given in latin transliteration (I asked him why) agree.

ᚠ ᚢ ᚦ (ᚬ/ᚭ)
ᚱ ᚴ ᚼ (ᚾ/ᚿ)      (I consider ᚱ П, because Bornholm's alphabet may say so)
ᛁ (ᛅ/ᛆ) ᛋ (ᛏ/ᛐ)
(ᛒ/ᛓ) ᛘ ᛚ ᛦ
doesn't show any structure, so let me play with it:
 (ᛅ/ᛆ)   ᛁ (ᚬ/ᚭ)  ᚢ
(ᛒ/ᛓ)   ᚠ  ᛘ      ᚱ
 ᚦ       ᚼ   ᚴ      ᛚ
(ᚾ/ᚿ)  ᛦ   ᛋ  (ᛏ/ᛐ)
   
Кто не умеет учит подаётся как забавное наблюдение, но это как минимум печальное наблюдение, а может и суровая критика системы превалировавшей сегодня.

превалировавший
превалирующий
Two vavs are read differently: в in the past, ю in the future. So V read as U is the modern pronunciation. Future is all in u, and then it is even a, as in bus, cut, duck


bus cut duck
bu

aa = o
aaaa = o = u
and such ogham I would understand. But what if they refigure ogham, re or mistransliterated its vowels? I believe in ogham where o is a, oo is o, ooo or oooo u, and ooo would be enough, which supports the hypothesis of its trinity, and let's try to reconstruct the protoogham.. but then I notice, that aou are o oo and ooo:

so isn't it natural that u and и are the same y? but that would be aui, as the poles of the labiality and linguality. And then a aa aaa would be a u i? but I thought orf auo where o is combination of a and u as today in french and english it is. so would it explain fours and fives. Let's imgine that three vowels and two are dyphthongs. So we know that a and u is o, a and e is i sometimes:
a e (i) u o
o oo oooo were the thing.
then o+oo=ooo, o+oooo=ooooo
i.e.    a+e=i,        a+u=o
aeiuo it gives, and if o is omega it is the way it is. but then there's the whole o-line and it is very

pee? qui? si=ti
R could be Rei, a later addition? Low and Reigh

aieuo would also play ai~e: aim, aid, air, they all sound as эй: entertainment.
but it would have difficulty being agreeing with aeiou. Hebrew alphabet only has four lines with u being at f, but w, and this is

and we need to find ogham which couldn't be taken for ogham, because it is too ancient, while ogham is attested to recent times only. And probably ogham found in the deep is told to be dug by owners into older layers of the earth. I need audit archaeology (archaeology, psychiatry, and I have audited physics and found big bang theory flawed, chemistry and found that mole is taught intentionally more complicated than necessary (I belive in intent because I cannot accept that people are that retarded)



завал = довал (до изобретения валов были завалы, из которых родились заборы и стены, но за как голландское ге, префикс совершенной формы, как бил и забил. забор имеет смысл строить до бора, чтоб по дереву не перелезли)


Многие знают про конфликтующие лекарства, мало кто поймёт даже конфликтующие процессы, такие как сон и водопровод. Я хочу чтоб сон не мешал мне пить и писять!



It is interesting, that here letters not changing their shape are AEMKT
and if we took not russian, but greek, such letters would be many more. Lating and russian as the two opposites of the same writing system. And it gives me five-letter chart which covers all the forms of letters: two vowels, labial and both forms of linguals (velar and coronal)
and O! of course, O!
AEM
OKT
т is cursive т in russian
k in cursive looks like e with stave
a looks like o with stave, but k and t are with stave, so how so!
A E O?
A E O across B C D? [б g д]
б g д obviously demand e to follow, and it does: б g д e are the whole range of vertical forms, but what are horizontal? cursive ש looks like д rotated 90 degrees clockwise, as if it is something between д and e, ш~ж as palatalized д? makes pretty good sense. And this logic takes two shapes, thus we have 4 vertical shapes and two horizontal shapes, as if balancing out the two vertical directions and four horizontal directions in the real life. But it would be natural to go as above so below, and to have it the other way around, and I hold my head aside now for my ear bothers me for bothering it, and it reminds me of 90 degrees rotation allowing to read text and different traditions of reading it. So, it's more likely that latin is rotated original shape, where bgdeb is back but d is dexter, but if there were right and left, those would be r and L and it would be rotated as rLand two other shapes would be Jᛐ and though at first I was dubious about ᛐ, since I immediatedly saw that runic t as 1, I also saw it as I~ו~ا~ן
(I didn't expect ן to stand in betwee, but next to I it reminds me of И~N thing and these two are part of trinity ИHN and because H may remind M and M stands between И and N in alphabets, and because H is basis for many linguals in japanese (yes, I believe japanese was influenced by the same ideas basis of latin was influenced by, I believe these writing systems related, and which are not! it only depends on the level of connections (yes, naturally there were more than one (more than one session between influential wizards from different states and nations (yes, even if in form of literature they shared))))

But then if it is something so fundamental, and because I don't shy to combine latin with hebrew, it must be present in every other alphabet..
აბგდევზთიკლმნოპჟრსტუფქღყშჩცძწჭხჯჰ contains აბგდევზთიკლმნოპჟრსტუფქღყშჩცძ  წჭხჯჰ
                                                                                d       t          mn                 p        š    dz ts h
And thus we can see pairs მნ, შწ, ძხ of m/n, š/ts, dz/h
but I'm more intrigued with დფ for d/p, but then unlike d/p, დფ don't turn one into the other, and positionally they're д/ф, or d/v, but then с standing not where c stands, tells me that positions of symbols are rather arbitrary, fonetical similarity may confuse the creators of national alphabets (every alphabet was created by some guy and the continuity of the structures indicate the time and culture in which those alphabets were made.