M~Ϻ (probably, related to W~Ш)
the only similarity in articulatory part is that both are fricative, or at least not plosive, lion, and if there were only two letters and they were short and long, then b~d and M~Σ.
мама ~ мария ~ маша
ᛘ ~ ᛉ М~Ш (山 (шанCH, маунтинEN))
I II III
I N M could be the first alphabet (japanese i ni mi)
I H Ш also could be.. is III reminding both M and Ш relates to Μ~Σ hypersymilarity.
ɪ п ш
ɪдɪнɪцɪ пара шри.. три!
ɪнɪцɪаль, пере, шире.. too re? two ri?
В каком-нибудь языке можно представить слово "три" как two + some ri? Is there word for "one" similar for ri in some language?
Yes, there are actually several languages that use a similar construction for the word "three." In many Austronesian languages, such as Māori, Hawaiian, and Samoan, the word for "three" is a compound of the words for "two" and "one." For example, in Māori, "toru" means "three" and is composed of "tahi" (one) and "rua" (two). Similarly, in Samoan, "tolu" means "three" and is made up of "tasi" (one) and "lua" (two). So, these languages do indeed represent "three" as "two" plus a form of "one" that sounds similar to "ri."
m[m] ~ т[т] (it is here, because t~s (upside down f is ſ, imagine that!)
真 (true) is Ma in japanese, but Shin in chinese (could be a coincidence, but it is an important word)
𓆄 H6 U+13184
Maat (mꜣꜥt), Goddess Maat
God Shu (šw)
Maat's Shu feather
feather (šwt)
I thought such omographics say that it is their home, but.. blocks your path:
Who is the male
version of Maat?
The God Djehuty, or whom the Greeks call Thoth. Djehuty is the male counterpart or husband of Ma'at. Together they maintain the balance of the universe. Djehuty/Thoth is also the God associated with writing and philosophy.
(the response is from ai, and it's early
2024, so take it with a grain of salt, but I think it's nice)The God Djehuty, or whom the Greeks call Thoth. Djehuty is the male counterpart or husband of Ma'at. Together they maintain the balance of the universe. Djehuty/Thoth is also the God associated with writing and philosophy.
>
Maybe you know how Maat and Shu are connected? I ask
because why do they share the 𓆄 sign? Was Shu a priest of
Maat or something? I want to know also because M and S are
often confusing pair:
M~Ϻ
ᛘ ~ ᛉ
Do you see the graphic side of the letters? Do you see what I mean?
In Egyptian mythology, Maat and Shu are connected in several ways, although Shu is not explicitly described as a priest of Maat. Maat is the goddess of truth, justice, and cosmic order, while Shu is the god of air and wind. Together, they are part of the Heliopolitan Ennead, a group of nine gods in the creation myth. Shu is often depicted holding up the sky, which separates the heavens from the earth, and this separation is seen as maintaining the balance and order that Maat represents.
As for the connection between the symbols 𓆄 and the letters M and S, it's an interesting observation! While there isn't a direct connection between the Egyptian hieroglyph 𓆄 and the letters M and S, it's true that the shapes of some letters across different scripts can share similarities. This can be due to various reasons, such as the evolution of writing systems over time, cultural influences, or even coincidences.
M~Ϻ
ᛘ ~ ᛉ
Do you see the graphic side of the letters? Do you see what I mean?
In Egyptian mythology, Maat and Shu are connected in several ways, although Shu is not explicitly described as a priest of Maat. Maat is the goddess of truth, justice, and cosmic order, while Shu is the god of air and wind. Together, they are part of the Heliopolitan Ennead, a group of nine gods in the creation myth. Shu is often depicted holding up the sky, which separates the heavens from the earth, and this separation is seen as maintaining the balance and order that Maat represents.
As for the connection between the symbols 𓆄 and the letters M and S, it's an interesting observation! While there isn't a direct connection between the Egyptian hieroglyph 𓆄 and the letters M and S, it's true that the shapes of some letters across different scripts can share similarities. This can be due to various reasons, such as the evolution of writing systems over time, cultural influences, or even coincidences.
Lampung's Ma is brahmi's Ṣa
Greetings from the u~и W~Ш file:
(under that link there's more context)
M is for Moving
Σ is for Σweeping
if bird looks at the beginning of the line, and M is bird flying at us or from us, then Σ would be more egyptian way to write down Ϻ, Σ is Ϻ flying not to us, but to the left, from where we draw.
W is more advanced way to write "птичка" (✓) than V, and yet if we compare W to M, it's upside down. just as V is upside down Ʌ(A (agni, агонь (and, who knows, maybe Λ(L (пЛамя, fLame.. and isn't that fl fr of fire! some nations don't distinct between L and R, and that is something hard to lose once you have it, so they're the source (they didn't change the protolanguage in that aspect as much as others of us did (chinks read R as Ж or something, but then they have L as well)))))
Σ is for Σweeping
if bird looks at the beginning of the line, and M is bird flying at us or from us, then Σ would be more egyptian way to write down Ϻ, Σ is Ϻ flying not to us, but to the left, from where we draw.
W is more advanced way to write "птичка" (✓) than V, and yet if we compare W to M, it's upside down. just as V is upside down Ʌ(A (agni, агонь (and, who knows, maybe Λ(L (пЛамя, fLame.. and isn't that fl fr of fire! some nations don't distinct between L and R, and that is something hard to lose once you have it, so they're the source (they didn't change the protolanguage in that aspect as much as others of us did (chinks read R as Ж or something, but then they have L as well)))))
devanagari's म[m] ~ ਸ[s] of gurmukhi (ਮ[m] in gurmukhi, the staveless ਸ)
The came case is closed: M and Σ are different forms of doubling of the same L~Г:
.png)
similar as moon and sun
𒈦 [maš, sa] middle, centre (in sumerian, though when it's read as maš, it's an alternative form of 𒈧, which is neither middle nor centre, but a he-goat, sacrificial animal, interest on loans)
in akkadian 𒈦 is only sa the middle (according to wiktionary) but they also know 𒈧, which they understand as divination, not sacrifice, which makes me suspect that it is the root of the word magic.
soak ~ сок (оба слова похоже что родственны слову са́ка, которое будучи синонимом слова моча похоже что является объяснением этого парадокса, символ узначаем как 𓈖 в обоих языках, но произносимый по разному.
soak (замачивать, отмачивать)
более пристойные однокоренные: мочить и
сочиться
но ближе и по смыслу и по звучанию мочиться и сочиться
is ~ amно ближе и по смыслу и по звучанию мочиться и сочиться
sea ~ море
море ~ shore
𐤌 for M (looks like ш (or щ, or ч))
complare to 𐤔[s, ш] and yet compare that 𐤔 to 𐤉[i]
ma ~ she
нас ~ нам (both are us, so technically they're semi-synonymous)
(быть может здесь эта странность обыгрывается. А может быть Ϻ это просто нераспознанное Σ?)
Ну, в этом может быть, от него и идея
Use of san in archaic Sicyonian writing: shard incised with the dedicatory inscription ͱεροοϻ heroos (Attic spelling ἥρωος, "of the hero"), using san together with heta (Ͱ), and a characteristic Sikyonian X-shaped form of epsilon.
Но в этом уже не прокатит:
Use of san in archaic Corinthian script: incised shard with a list of names, c.700 BC. The text reads:
]........ΑΝΤΑϺ⁞ΧΑ.[
]....ΚΕΑϺ⁞ΑΝΓΑΡΙΟϺ[
]...ΑΥϜΙΟϺ⁞ϺΟΚΛΕϺ⁞[
].ΤΙΔΑϺ⁞ΑΜΥΝΤΑϺ[
]ΤΟΙ ΜΑΛΕϘΟ⁞ΚΑΙ.[
Note the use of san at the end of most names, and the difference between san and mu (with a shorter right stem, ) in the word "ΑΜΥΝΤΑϺ".
And what if both are M? But they know the language and I don't.
ichi and hito can be seen as having initial vowels (H is И in greek today) and chinese yi too.
futa and ni can be seen as having initials labials (N is not far from M: мы, но нас (us~nus~mus?))
san is obviously having initial lingual, but what about Mi? could it be the M~Ϻ thing? could japanese mi and english three be cognates? I seriously doubt it, but here it belongs.
greetings from cognates
ж
жадно (greedily) жаждет (thirsty, wishes) т.о (because thirsty is one of the main meanings) это ж от жижа, от звука похожего на звук поцелуя, изображая сёрпанье (питие), а может звук поцелуя это и был, ибо жажду женщину, и может в ней же тоже от жижа. Женщина олицетворяет стихию воды, т.е. однозначно Ж как жижа? а M в словах може море, мыть, мочить, моча, молоко, и прочие напитки. пить на губную начинается. Обсуждали в 46 или 47 томе этот феномен.
Ж как ᛉ[z, ks]
М как ᛘ[m] is the best guess so far.
Oסם of oms the three mothers? mom as bubble?
but O is not hebrew, they only have סם if of yin yang ΜΣ
and the O part of ΜΣ would be W the Ѡ. And З would be the fourth orientation. And ЗΣ would start another set of pairs, if other examples came, but there are knone. unless bp. are dq another one? is q Ч as in чinqoise the chinese (those who know some chinese may understand it)
ѠMЗΣ
Clockwise sequence would be MЗѠΣ, MЗWΣ.
And this returns us to that ᚱ~ᚢ thing. wise, rise.
and naturally (I thought you'd immediately see it as I did, I see Mothers in that MЗWΣ.
EFГI ~ ΙΛΝΜ would be more consistent. would EZГI? to my surprise it also would. Are (F~Z) ~ (ᛘ~ᛉ)
.
