M~Ϻ (probably, related to W~Ш)
the only similarity in articulatory part is that both are fricative, or at least not plosive, lion, and if there were only two letters and they were short and long, then b~d and M~Σ.
мама ~ мария ~ маша
ᛘ ~ ᛉ М~Ш (山 (шанCH, маунтинEN))
I II III
I N M could be the first alphabet (japanese i ni mi)
I H Ш also could be.. is III reminding both M and Ш relates to Μ~Σ hypersymilarity.
ɪ п ш
ɪдɪнɪцɪ пара шри.. три!
ɪнɪцɪаль, пере, шире.. too re? two ri?
В каком-нибудь языке можно представить слово "три" как two + some ri? Is there word for "one" similar for ri in some language?
Yes, there are actually several languages that use a similar construction for the word "three." In many Austronesian languages, such as Māori, Hawaiian, and Samoan, the word for "three" is a compound of the words for "two" and "one." For example, in Māori, "toru" means "three" and is composed of "tahi" (one) and "rua" (two). Similarly, in Samoan, "tolu" means "three" and is made up of "tasi" (one) and "lua" (two). So, these languages do indeed represent "three" as "two" plus a form of "one" that sounds similar to "ri."
m[m] ~ т[т] (it is here, because t~s (upside down f is ſ, imagine that!)
真 (true) is Ma in japanese, but Shin in chinese (could be a coincidence, but it is an important word)
𓆄 H6 U+13184
Maat (mꜣꜥt), Goddess Maat
God Shu (šw)
Maat's Shu feather
feather (šwt)
I thought such omographics say that it is their home, but.. blocks your path:
Who is the male
version of Maat?
The God Djehuty, or whom the Greeks call Thoth. Djehuty is the male counterpart or husband of Ma'at. Together they maintain the balance of the universe. Djehuty/Thoth is also the God associated with writing and philosophy.
(the response is from ai, and it's early
2024, so take it with a grain of salt, but I think it's nice)The God Djehuty, or whom the Greeks call Thoth. Djehuty is the male counterpart or husband of Ma'at. Together they maintain the balance of the universe. Djehuty/Thoth is also the God associated with writing and philosophy.
>
Maybe you know how Maat and Shu are connected? I ask
because why do they share the 𓆄 sign? Was Shu a priest of
Maat or something? I want to know also because M and S are
often confusing pair:
M~Ϻ
ᛘ ~ ᛉ
Do you see the graphic side of the letters? Do you see what I mean?
In Egyptian mythology, Maat and Shu are connected in several ways, although Shu is not explicitly described as a priest of Maat. Maat is the goddess of truth, justice, and cosmic order, while Shu is the god of air and wind. Together, they are part of the Heliopolitan Ennead, a group of nine gods in the creation myth. Shu is often depicted holding up the sky, which separates the heavens from the earth, and this separation is seen as maintaining the balance and order that Maat represents.
As for the connection between the symbols 𓆄 and the letters M and S, it's an interesting observation! While there isn't a direct connection between the Egyptian hieroglyph 𓆄 and the letters M and S, it's true that the shapes of some letters across different scripts can share similarities. This can be due to various reasons, such as the evolution of writing systems over time, cultural influences, or even coincidences.
M~Ϻ
ᛘ ~ ᛉ
Do you see the graphic side of the letters? Do you see what I mean?
In Egyptian mythology, Maat and Shu are connected in several ways, although Shu is not explicitly described as a priest of Maat. Maat is the goddess of truth, justice, and cosmic order, while Shu is the god of air and wind. Together, they are part of the Heliopolitan Ennead, a group of nine gods in the creation myth. Shu is often depicted holding up the sky, which separates the heavens from the earth, and this separation is seen as maintaining the balance and order that Maat represents.
As for the connection between the symbols 𓆄 and the letters M and S, it's an interesting observation! While there isn't a direct connection between the Egyptian hieroglyph 𓆄 and the letters M and S, it's true that the shapes of some letters across different scripts can share similarities. This can be due to various reasons, such as the evolution of writing systems over time, cultural influences, or even coincidences.
Lampung's Ma is brahmi's Ṣa
Greetings from the u~и W~Ш file:
(under that link there's more context)
M is for Moving
Σ is for Σweeping
if bird looks at the beginning of the line, and M is bird flying at us or from us, then Σ would be more egyptian way to write down Ϻ, Σ is Ϻ flying not to us, but to the left, from where we draw.
W is more advanced way to write "птичка" (✓) than V, and yet if we compare W to M, it's upside down. just as V is upside down Ʌ(A (agni, агонь (and, who knows, maybe Λ(L (пЛамя, fLame.. and isn't that fl fr of fire! some nations don't distinct between L and R, and that is something hard to lose once you have it, so they're the source (they didn't change the protolanguage in that aspect as much as others of us did (chinks read R as Ж or something, but then they have L as well)))))
Σ is for Σweeping
if bird looks at the beginning of the line, and M is bird flying at us or from us, then Σ would be more egyptian way to write down Ϻ, Σ is Ϻ flying not to us, but to the left, from where we draw.
W is more advanced way to write "птичка" (✓) than V, and yet if we compare W to M, it's upside down. just as V is upside down Ʌ(A (agni, агонь (and, who knows, maybe Λ(L (пЛамя, fLame.. and isn't that fl fr of fire! some nations don't distinct between L and R, and that is something hard to lose once you have it, so they're the source (they didn't change the protolanguage in that aspect as much as others of us did (chinks read R as Ж or something, but then they have L as well)))))
.
