(the tune was so disgustingly cheasy, that I had to remove the last U from the link to it,
and the other one died by itself. Good.)

that video is interesting in the way that it has the same refrain as another song, published in the exact same 1983, and both songs became huge hits (probably the biggest in each of bands I never even heard of.

the one I have shown on page one of this video collection, play it on your own risk, pop music is contageous, and that previous one is literally the first hit on american market made only on computer.
Which only proves how bad the public taste can be. Or, rather, it was some humiliation ritual of rubbing it into the audience's faces. Look what you like, like that.
1983. could it be some spell to play away the 1984? and was 1984 itself from some porediction
and the both videos are 3:49!
(in case youtube links die, it's IOU by Freeez and AEOU Sometimes Y by Ebn Ozn)
(well actually 3:48 or 3:49 of Ebn Ozn and 3:49 or 3:50 of Freeez)
IOU also has the line AEIOU and sometimes Y (Ebn Ozn's song doesn't sing that ang)
both song are not some regular pop music, but have their own charm, they are charming songs (I can't believe I said it, they're grotesquely gross) as if the masterful professionals wrote them as if supporting the guess of them being some psy-op
And it's very interesting, that I brought this subject exactly when russian empire has to dissolve even further.
Freeez would be much more successful if they found a girl to sing those lines as well, so it wouldn't look that gay,  but then maybe they were disrupting intentionally and funded for this by some special audience.
freeez released their single on June 17, 1983, and ebn ozn did on 3 September 1983
(ebn ozn could remind their audience of the freeez song as if he and that girl were listening to it)
both bands disbanded in 1985 (when Gorby came in power)
and because those songs are rather contagious, here's the antidote for those who were curious and allowed any of those ear-worms in. It's something in the same tonality, but of much better quality as the music, it's Orbital with Mediæval Bæbes


and we continue with the list of vowel chants:
here's one with something of the Moon:

it's also a pop-song, but much less annoying than those two.
It is not aeiou, but eoua, which could be just accidental, but who knows, could be a chant from the times when A didn't stand before B.
It's Kalimba De Luna by Boney M
(kalimba is an african idiophone, it's a rabbit hole per se)
(only now can I see that the name of the band could be "fit mama", boney as of bones)

Gente li ta los doesn't seem to mean anything, but then in spannish Gente is People and los are them. The song was written by some other guys, and it was also released in 1984 by both the Tony Esposito as the author, and by Boney M in the same year. Weird, huh? was it a weird set of coincidences or was it a coordinated attack by the magicians to collapse ussr?
Well, it is good to know that such methods to influence the world may exist, but then again it's only a hypothesis, and of a wild kind too.
Gente Li Ta Los could be encrypted Gente l'Italos, since the original songwriter is italian.
But then there's this based take from Pi.ai: "Gente l'Italos" is not quite grammatically correct in Italian, but it's close! The correct way to say "People of Italy" or "Italian People" in Italian would be "Il popolo italiano" or "Gli italiani."
The issue with "Gente l'Italos" is that "l'Italos" isn't a valid Italian phrase. "L'Italia" is the Italian word for Italy, but "Italos" doesn't have any clear meaning in Italian. Additionally, "Gente" is usually followed by a plural noun, so "Gente l'Italos" would be a grammatical mismatch.
So while "Gente l'Italos" might be an interesting idea for an encrypted phrase, it's not quite accurate in terms of Italian grammar.

also why would he ingrained loss into it? or is it their loss, that the song is in English?

And back to that hypothesis of this set of songs being a magical campaign of some sort, Abracadabra by Steve Miller was published just two years before all these songs, in 1982 and could be the beginning of the campaign. All the songs were tremendous success, which may be an indicator of magic working.
Imagine having seen those songs in one sequence, that could blow the listener's mind real good.


But let's get on a more serious note:

AI Overview:  The term "Iao formula" refers to the magical formula IAO, which symbolizes the cycle of life, death, and rebirth, with "I" representing Isis, "A" representing Apophis the Destroyer, and "O" representing Osiris the Redeemer. While this is its primary meaning in Thelema and Hermetic traditions, the letters IAO have also been used as a form of the divine name Yahweh in ancient texts and are also known by other applications, such as Incident Action Objectives in emergency services.

According to various Indian schools of philosophy, tattvas (Sanskrit: तत्त्व) are the elements or aspects of reality that constitute human experience.[1] In some traditions, they are conceived as an aspect of the Indian deities. Although the number of tattvas varies depending on the philosophical school, together they are thought to form the basis of all our experience. The Samkhya philosophy uses a system of 25 tattvas, while Shaivism uses a system of 36 tattvas. In Buddhism, the equivalent is the list of Abhidharma which constitute reality, as in Namarupa.
And it this light A Ka Sa Ta Na could be all the hiragana
But then maybe they had two 55 syllables.
Somebody could add the other half
using the luxury of the next page.
Ha Ma Ya Ra Wa are exactly the other half.
Thus gojuon. Literally 50 symbols.
50 signs.
50 glyphs
or something along these lines.

Notice how the speaker pronounces theory [ви́ори]
and who knows if it's some local dialect or if they know θ as в.
And also ax insted of asked.
And then speaks of that formula being used in lunar ritual.
And that makes this trinity the trinity of the three phases.
IAO as ☽︎◯☾
weird, huh.
And because O is best as ◯,
☾☽︎◯ would make a better IAO:
☾ as i,
☽︎ as ɔ ~ a
◯ as Ω
But if IAO are Isis Apophis Osiris are Life Death Rebirth (notice L tor R bath of that)
(especially interesting if Death is Смерть and thus C is for Centre. Death as the middle point)
(for the believers it is literally what it is)
Then he speaks something which demands the direct text:

I the father and O the mother. That is more to the point.
What he calls the higher matter unsuited for this elementary handbook is along that line, and child which is the field for the operation is each of us.
IAO as magick formula or elementary mysticism in all its branches.
That is the descending scale, which is archaic. And triad is even more archaic than pentatonic scale.
 And it makes me wonder if AUM is not another scale, similar to bass key.
And both are IAOUM. But because google doesn't know it, probably they were not to use at the same time, or else they would be pentatonic. Could it be how it started? Moon has to return at its place. Rebirth, not return. I*AOI*AOI*AO?
Perplexity: The term "IAO" does not correspond to any recognized ancient musical scale in the context of musical theory or historical musicology based on available sources. However, the "Ionian" mode (which could be loosely related to "IAO" if mistaken) is indeed an ancient concept in music theory. The Ionian mode is the basis for the modern major scale and was first formally named in the 16th century but is rooted in ancient Greek musical traditions. It consists of the sequence of intervals that corresponds exactly to the major scale used widely today in Western music.
The "AUM" is not recognized as an ancient musical scale either. In Indian tradition, "AUM" or "OM" is a sacred sound and spiritual icon but not a named scale in a musical sense. Indian classical music has its own distinct system of ragas (melodic frameworks) and scales, but "AUM" is a syllable rather than a scale designation.
Therefore, neither IAO nor AUM are ancient musical scales as per historical or theoretical music sources. Ionian mode may be the closest well-known ancient scale reflected in Western music history comparable to the major scale.
If further details or specific cultural musical traditions are of interest, a deeper look could be done, but based on current standard sources, IAO and AUM are not ancient musical scales.
The syllable "IAO" is historically found in ancient Jewish and Greco-Roman magical and religious contexts. It is closely related to the Hebrew name for God (Tetragrammaton YHWH) and appears in Greek transliteration as "IAO." This syllable was used in mystical and magical rites and is linked to divine names within Jewish, Gnostic, and Chaldean mystery traditions. It appears in the Dead Sea Scrolls written in paleo-Hebrew script and is thought to represent the sacred name of God, invoked during rituals for protection and spiritual power.
The syllable "AUM" (or "OM") is a sacred sound and seed syllable fundamental to Hinduism and other Indian religions. It symbolizes the primordial sound of the universe and God's trinity in Hindu thought (Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva). In ancient rituals, it is chanted at the beginning and end of prayers, meditation, and spiritual ceremonies to purify the mind and body, enhance concentration, and invoke cosmic harmony. It is deeply embedded in meditation practices and is considered the essence of ultimate reality or Brahman. The recitation of AUM is believed to have transformative and protective effects within spiritual rituals.
In summary:
    IAO is used in ancient Jewish and Greco-Roman mystical rituals as a divine name or word of power.
    AUM is a sacred mantra in ancient Indian rituals representing creation, cosmic cycles, and spiritual unity.
Both syllables serve as powerful invocations in their respective religious and spiritual ritual traditions.

Grok:  The terms IAO and AUM are not traditionally recognized as ancient musical scales in the way we typically define musical scales (e.g., like the Greek modes, Indian ragas, or pentatonic scales). Instead, they are more closely associated with spiritual, mystical, or symbolic traditions, often carrying phonetic, vibrational, or esoteric significance rather than being structured musical scales with defined intervals or notes. Let's break it down:IAOOrigin and Context: IAO is a sacred syllable or word often found in Gnosticism, Hellenistic mysticism, and certain esoteric traditions. It is considered a vocalization of divine names or a mystical formula, sometimes linked to the Greek letters Ι (Iota), Α (Alpha), and Ω (Omega), symbolizing the beginning and end.
Musical Connection: IAO is not documented as a musical scale in historical music theory. However, its vocalization may have been used in ritual chants or intonations, where the sequence of vowels (I-A-O) could create a melodic or harmonic effect in a ritualistic context. In some esoteric traditions, such as those influenced by the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, IAO is chanted or intoned, potentially with specific pitches, but this does not constitute a formal scale.
Cultural Significance: The sound of IAO is often tied to its phonetic and vibrational qualities, believed to have spiritual or transformative effects, rather than being part of a structured musical system.
AUM (OM)Origin and Context: AUM (often spelled OM) is a sacred sound and spiritual symbol in Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and other Indian spiritual traditions. It is considered the primordial sound of the universe, encompassing creation, preservation, and dissolution.
Musical Connection: AUM is not a musical scale but a mantra, typically chanted as a single syllable or drawn out into its component sounds (A-U-M). In Indian classical music, the chanting of AUM may serve as a tonal foundation or meditative practice, often aligned with a drone note (like the tonic in a raga). While it is deeply musical in its use, it does not represent a scale with a sequence of intervals like, say, a pentatonic or diatonic scale.
Vibrational Role: AUM is often intoned at specific pitches or in a free-flowing melodic form during meditation or rituals. Its three sounds (A, U, M) are sometimes associated with different states of consciousness or cosmic principles, but they do not form a scale in the technical sense.
Are They Scales?Neither IAO nor AUM qualifies as a musical scale in the conventional sense (i.e., a structured sequence of pitches or intervals used as the basis for musical composition). Instead, they are sacred sounds or mantras used in spiritual or ritual contexts, often with a focus on their phonetic, vibrational, or symbolic properties.
In some cases, these sounds might be intoned with melodic contours or specific pitches in ritual music, but they lack the systematic organization of a scale. For comparison, ancient musical scales like the Greek modes (e.g., Dorian, Phrygian) or Indian ragas have defined sequences of notes and rules for their use, which IAO and AUM do not.
ConclusionIAO and AUM are not ancient musical scales but rather sacred syllables or mantras with spiritual significance. Their use in chanting or ritual may involve musical elements, such as pitch or melody, but they do not constitute scales in the musicological sense. If you're interested in their use in specific rituals or their potential melodic applications, I can explore those aspects further or search for additional context if needed! Let me know how you'd like to proceed.

but let's check the following two pages too

And that's what I'm talking about: ע is O
And he continues, but I prefer not to read mystical literature,
not to be posessed by its constructs, for not only do they naturally contain mistakes,
they also may have intentional decievements; and they're not easy reading either.