(the tune was so disgustingly cheasy,
that I had to remove the last U from the link to it,
and the other one died by itself. Good.)
that video is interesting in the way that it has the same
refrain as another song, published in the exact same 1983, and
both songs became huge hits (probably the biggest in each of
bands I never even heard of.
the one I have shown on page one of this video collection, play
it on your own risk, pop music is contageous, and that previous
one is literally the first hit on american market made only on
computer.
Which only proves how bad the public taste can be. Or, rather,
it was some humiliation ritual of rubbing it into the audience's
faces. Look what you like, like that.
1983. could it be some spell to play away the 1984? and was 1984
itself from some porediction
and the both videos are 3:49!
(in case youtube links die, it's IOU by Freeez and AEOU
Sometimes Y by Ebn Ozn)
(well actually 3:48 or 3:49 of Ebn Ozn and 3:49 or 3:50 of
Freeez)
IOU also has the line AEIOU and sometimes Y (Ebn Ozn's song
doesn't sing that ang)
both song are not some regular pop music, but have their own
charm, they are charming songs (I can't believe I said it,
they're grotesquely gross) as if the masterful professionals
wrote them as if supporting the guess of them being some psy-op
And it's very interesting, that I brought this subject exactly
when russian empire has to dissolve even further.
Freeez would be much more successful if they found a girl to
sing those lines as well, so it wouldn't look that gay,
but then maybe they were disrupting intentionally and funded for
this by some special audience.
freeez released their single on June 17, 1983, and ebn ozn did
on 3 September 1983
(ebn ozn could remind their audience of the freeez song as if he
and that girl were listening to it)
both bands disbanded in 1985 (when Gorby came in power)
and because those songs are rather contagious, here's the
antidote for those who were curious and allowed any of
those ear-worms in. It's something in the
same tonality, but of much better quality as the music, it's
Orbital with Mediæval Bæbes
and we continue with the list of vowel chants:
here's one with something of the Moon:
it's also a pop-song, but much less annoying than those two.
It is not aeiou, but eoua, which could be just accidental, but who
knows, could be a chant from the times when A didn't stand before
B.
It's Kalimba De Luna by Boney M
(kalimba is an african idiophone, it's a rabbit hole per se)
(only now can I see that the name of the band could be "fit
mama", boney as of bones)
Gente li ta los doesn't seem to mean anything, but then in
spannish Gente is People and los are them. The song was written by
some other guys, and it was also released in 1984 by both the Tony
Esposito as the author, and by Boney M in the same year. Weird,
huh? was it a weird set of coincidences or was it a coordinated
attack by the magicians to collapse ussr?
Well, it is good to know that such methods to influence the world
may exist, but then again it's only a hypothesis, and of a wild
kind too.
Gente Li Ta Los could be encrypted Gente l'Italos, since the
original songwriter is italian.
But then there's this based take from Pi.ai: "Gente
l'Italos" is not quite grammatically correct in Italian, but
it's close! The correct way to say "People of Italy" or "Italian
People" in Italian would be "Il popolo italiano" or "Gli
italiani."
The issue with "Gente l'Italos" is that "l'Italos" isn't a valid
Italian phrase. "L'Italia" is the Italian word for Italy, but
"Italos" doesn't have any clear meaning in Italian.
Additionally, "Gente" is usually followed by a plural noun, so
"Gente l'Italos" would be a grammatical mismatch.
So while "Gente l'Italos" might be an interesting idea for an
encrypted phrase, it's not quite accurate in terms of Italian
grammar.
also why would he ingrained loss into it? or is it their loss,
that the song is in English?
And back to that hypothesis of this set of songs being a magical
campaign of some sort, Abracadabra by Steve Miller was published
just two years before all these songs, in 1982 and could be the
beginning of the campaign. All the songs were tremendous success,
which may be an indicator of magic working.
Imagine having seen those songs in one sequence, that could blow
the listener's mind real good.
But let's get on a more serious note:
AI Overview: The term "Iao formula" refers
to the magical formula IAO, which symbolizes the cycle of
life, death, and rebirth, with "I" representing Isis, "A"
representing Apophis the Destroyer, and "O" representing
Osiris the Redeemer. While this is its primary meaning in
Thelema and Hermetic traditions, the letters IAO have also
been used as a form of the divine name Yahweh in ancient texts
and are also known by other applications, such as Incident
Action Objectives in emergency services.
According to various Indian schools of
philosophy, tattvas (Sanskrit: तत्त्व) are the elements or
aspects of reality that constitute human experience.[1] In
some traditions, they are conceived as an aspect of the Indian
deities. Although the number of tattvas varies depending on
the philosophical school, together they are thought to form
the basis of all our experience. The Samkhya philosophy uses a
system of 25 tattvas, while Shaivism uses a system of 36
tattvas. In Buddhism, the equivalent is the list of Abhidharma
which constitute reality, as in Namarupa.
And it this light A Ka Sa Ta Na could be all the hiragana
But then maybe they had two 55 syllables.
Somebody could add the other half
using the luxury of the next page.
Ha Ma Ya Ra Wa are exactly the other half.
Thus gojuon. Literally 50 symbols.
50 signs.
50 glyphs
or something along these lines.
Notice how the speaker pronounces theory [ви́ори]
and who knows if it's some local dialect or if they know θ as в.
And also ax insted of asked.
And then speaks of that formula being used in lunar ritual.
And that makes this trinity the trinity of the three phases.
IAO as ☽︎◯☾
weird, huh.
And because O is best as ◯,
☾☽︎◯ would make a better IAO:
☾ as i,
☽︎ as ɔ ~ a
◯ as Ω
But if IAO are Isis Apophis Osiris are Life Death Rebirth
(notice L tor R bath of that)
(especially interesting if Death is Смерть and thus C is for
Centre. Death as the middle point)
(for the believers it is literally what it is)
Then he speaks something which demands the direct text:
I the father and O the mother. That is more to the point.
What he calls the higher matter unsuited for this elementary
handbook is along that line, and child which is the field for the
operation is each of us.
IAO as magick formula or elementary mysticism
in all its branches.
That is the descending scale, which is archaic. And triad is
even more archaic than pentatonic scale.
And it makes me wonder if AUM is not another scale,
similar to bass key.
And both are IAOUM. But because google doesn't know it, probably
they were not to use at the same time, or else they would be
pentatonic. Could it be how it started? Moon has to return at
its place. Rebirth, not return. I*AOI*AOI*AO?
Perplexity: The term "IAO" does not correspond
to any recognized ancient musical scale in the context of
musical theory or historical musicology based on available
sources. However, the "Ionian" mode (which could be loosely
related to "IAO" if mistaken) is indeed an ancient concept in
music theory. The Ionian mode is the basis for the modern
major scale and was first formally named in the 16th century
but is rooted in ancient Greek musical traditions. It consists
of the sequence of intervals that corresponds exactly to the
major scale used widely today in Western music.
The "AUM" is not recognized as an ancient musical scale
either. In Indian tradition, "AUM" or "OM" is a sacred sound
and spiritual icon but not a named scale in a musical sense.
Indian classical music has its own distinct system of ragas
(melodic frameworks) and scales, but "AUM" is a syllable
rather than a scale designation.
Therefore, neither IAO nor AUM are ancient musical scales as
per historical or theoretical music sources. Ionian mode may
be the closest well-known ancient scale reflected in Western
music history comparable to the major scale.
If further details or specific cultural musical traditions are
of interest, a deeper look could be done, but based on current
standard sources, IAO and AUM are not ancient musical scales.
The syllable "IAO" is historically found in ancient Jewish and
Greco-Roman magical and religious contexts. It is closely
related to the Hebrew name for God (Tetragrammaton YHWH) and
appears in Greek transliteration as "IAO." This syllable was
used in mystical and magical rites and is linked to divine
names within Jewish, Gnostic, and Chaldean mystery traditions.
It appears in the Dead Sea Scrolls written in paleo-Hebrew
script and is thought to represent the sacred name of God,
invoked during rituals for protection and spiritual power.
The syllable "AUM" (or "OM") is a sacred sound and seed
syllable fundamental to Hinduism and other Indian religions.
It symbolizes the primordial sound of the universe and God's
trinity in Hindu thought (Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva). In ancient
rituals, it is chanted at the beginning and end of prayers,
meditation, and spiritual ceremonies to purify the mind and
body, enhance concentration, and invoke cosmic harmony. It is
deeply embedded in meditation practices and is considered the
essence of ultimate reality or Brahman. The recitation of AUM
is believed to have transformative and protective effects
within spiritual rituals.
In summary:
IAO is used in ancient Jewish and
Greco-Roman mystical rituals as a divine name or word of
power.
AUM is a sacred mantra in ancient Indian
rituals representing creation, cosmic cycles, and spiritual
unity.
Both syllables serve as powerful invocations in their
respective religious and spiritual ritual traditions.
Grok: The terms IAO and AUM are not
traditionally recognized as ancient musical scales in the way
we typically define musical scales (e.g., like the Greek
modes, Indian ragas, or pentatonic scales). Instead, they are
more closely associated with spiritual, mystical, or symbolic
traditions, often carrying phonetic, vibrational, or esoteric
significance rather than being structured musical scales with
defined intervals or notes. Let's break it down:IAOOrigin and
Context: IAO is a sacred syllable or word often found in
Gnosticism, Hellenistic mysticism, and certain esoteric
traditions. It is considered a vocalization of divine names or
a mystical formula, sometimes linked to the Greek letters Ι
(Iota), Α (Alpha), and Ω (Omega), symbolizing the beginning
and end.
Musical Connection: IAO is not documented as a musical scale
in historical music theory. However, its vocalization may have
been used in ritual chants or intonations, where the sequence
of vowels (I-A-O) could create a melodic or harmonic effect in
a ritualistic context. In some esoteric traditions, such as
those influenced by the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, IAO
is chanted or intoned, potentially with specific pitches, but
this does not constitute a formal scale.
Cultural Significance: The sound of IAO is often tied to its
phonetic and vibrational qualities, believed to have spiritual
or transformative effects, rather than being part of a
structured musical system.
AUM (OM)Origin and Context: AUM (often spelled OM) is a sacred
sound and spiritual symbol in Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and
other Indian spiritual traditions. It is considered the
primordial sound of the universe, encompassing creation,
preservation, and dissolution.
Musical Connection: AUM is not a musical scale but a mantra,
typically chanted as a single syllable or drawn out into its
component sounds (A-U-M). In Indian classical music, the
chanting of AUM may serve as a tonal foundation or meditative
practice, often aligned with a drone note (like the tonic in a
raga). While it is deeply musical in its use, it does not
represent a scale with a sequence of intervals like, say, a
pentatonic or diatonic scale.
Vibrational Role: AUM is often intoned at specific pitches or
in a free-flowing melodic form during meditation or rituals.
Its three sounds (A, U, M) are sometimes associated with
different states of consciousness or cosmic principles, but
they do not form a scale in the technical sense.
Are They Scales?Neither IAO nor AUM qualifies as a musical
scale in the conventional sense (i.e., a structured sequence
of pitches or intervals used as the basis for musical
composition). Instead, they are sacred sounds or mantras used
in spiritual or ritual contexts, often with a focus on their
phonetic, vibrational, or symbolic properties.
In some cases, these sounds might be intoned with melodic
contours or specific pitches in ritual music, but they lack
the systematic organization of a scale. For comparison,
ancient musical scales like the Greek modes (e.g., Dorian,
Phrygian) or Indian ragas have defined sequences of notes and
rules for their use, which IAO and AUM do not.
ConclusionIAO and AUM are not ancient musical scales but
rather sacred syllables or mantras with spiritual
significance. Their use in chanting or ritual may involve
musical elements, such as pitch or melody, but they do not
constitute scales in the musicological sense. If you're
interested in their use in specific rituals or their potential
melodic applications, I can explore those aspects further or
search for additional context if needed! Let me know how you'd
like to proceed.
but let's check the following two pages too
And that's what I'm talking about: ע is O
And he continues, but I prefer not to read mystical literature,
not to be posessed by its constructs, for not only do they
naturally contain mistakes,
they also may have intentional decievements; and they're not
easy reading either.