abacus
      
      amen
      
      имени
      
      1 3 2 (i mi ni)
JA
      
      yawn (probably the sacred origin of the abc: deepest stretching,
      глубинное 
потягивагните потягивание,
      которым я хочу пройти по всему телу одним движением, для этого
      нужна капсула. 
      
(не таблетка, а матка для взрослого
        младенца) 
        младенец~владелец?
      слово yawn было открыто при совмещении amen and even
      
      Иван
      (сравни с John так что то а может быть е even)
      
      Even
      
      Ever
      
      evil
      
      ебань
      
      
баня могла бы быть, но это к той гипотезе
        что а появилась позже, а раньше мол было
        bdeg, for example, and it is a good aligning: reflects
        the alphabetic order and correlates to c being g in the past.
        and to bornholm's ᛆᛒᚦ, and reflects greek mess with the e-line,
        where z(which I recognize as g as z~ž and thus in russian еёжз
        may link to that, unless ё is йод and йуд, which its position
        dictates: hebrew never went anywhere, hazarians were supposed to
        read hebrew, they say khazarians are the jews today, k as king?
        k as know, k is silent not only before n, but also before h, and
        n resembles h, are h and n the same letter? h is also х which
        links n to t, but t is т) unless пара was 2~3, and the
        word pair makes me think that it is P~R, not point on the sound
        axis, but a spectre.
        And pr spectre is farting sound, and it's labial, which could
        explain the ᚱ~ᚢ thing.
        
        Russian conserved that пр thing by saying not ravo, but pravo
        for right, their left is levo, so the suffix tells that those r
        and L are of the same period. Period when we read from top to
        bottom they seem to be (not bottom to top of runes and ogham,
        but top to bottom, so that the top side of r is at the right
        side and bottom side of l is the left side, so that explains
        those forms. But the ☯ doesn't approve of it, telling that r is
        on the left. but then the counterpart is d, but not l, d is
        dexter. but s of sinistre is the central line of the opposite
        form. were they (images of those shapes. one is black and white
        with black d, the other is the contour of the opposite one,
        having s for the middle line. s is snake, s is the other reading
        of the same ☯ shape)
        so was ☯ adapted in latin-speaking word first? Europe spoke
        lating till rather recently, christian church adapted latin as
        well. So is it a good christian church did? Nothing is absolute,
        so probably yeah, but then it also means that some shitty moment
        to that good thing also was.
      
      
      abyss
      
      amigo
      
      аюрведа (r is around where l is in alphabet (it also reflects ᚱ~ᚢ,
      makeing it one syllable maybe?))
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
          
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
.
      
      .