1 3 2 (i mi ni)JA
yawn (probably the sacred origin of the abc: deepest stretching,
которым я хочу пройти по всему телу одним движением, для этого
(не таблетка, а матка для взрослого
слово yawn было открыто при совмещении amen and even
(сравни с John так что то а может быть е even)
баня могла бы быть, но это к той гипотезе
что а появилась позже, а раньше мол было
bdeg, for example, and it is a good aligning: reflects
the alphabetic order and correlates to c being g in the past.
and to bornholm's ᛆᛒᚦ, and reflects greek mess with the e-line,
where z(which I recognize as g as z~ž and thus in russian еёжз
may link to that, unless ё is йод and йуд, which its position
dictates: hebrew never went anywhere, hazarians were supposed to
read hebrew, they say khazarians are the jews today, k as king?
k as know, k is silent not only before n, but also before h, and
n resembles h, are h and n the same letter? h is also х which
links n to t, but t is т) unless пара was 2~3, and the
word pair makes me think that it is P~R, not point on the sound
axis, but a spectre.
And pr spectre is farting sound, and it's labial, which could
explain the ᚱ~ᚢ thing.
Russian conserved that пр thing by saying not ravo, but pravo
for right, their left is levo, so the suffix tells that those r
and L are of the same period. Period when we read from top to
bottom they seem to be (not bottom to top of runes and ogham,
but top to bottom, so that the top side of r is at the right
side and bottom side of l is the left side, so that explains
those forms. But the ☯ doesn't approve of it, telling that r is
on the left. but then the counterpart is d, but not l, d is
dexter. but s of sinistre is the central line of the opposite
form. were they (images of those shapes. one is black and white
with black d, the other is the contour of the opposite one,
having s for the middle line. s is snake, s is the other reading
of the same ☯ shape)
so was ☯ adapted in latin-speaking word first? Europe spoke
lating till rather recently, christian church adapted latin as
well. So is it a good christian church did? Nothing is absolute,
so probably yeah, but then it also means that some shitty moment
to that good thing also was.